Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

BIOCHEMICAL POLYMORPHISMS IN SHEEP AND THEIR POTENTIAL USE FOR PATERNITY TESTS

POLIMORFISMOS BIOQUIMICOS EM OVINOS E A POSSIBILIDADE DE SUA UTILIZAÇÃO EM TESTES DE PATERNIDADE

Abstracts

The genetic variability of 22 protein loci was investigated in two sheep flocks: 22 females Romney Marsh and 124 animals derived from crossbreeding between Romney Marsh and Merino Booroola, reared by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária -EMBRAPA, Bagé, RS, Brazil). Eight loci were polymorphic; the others showed no variation. The usefulness of the eight plymorphic systems (Cat, DIA I, EP-1, EsA, HbB, ME, Tf, and X Prot.) in parentage tests was analyzed. The probability to find two random identical animals in each breed was estimated as 1:1000. The efficiency of these proteins for exclusion of one of two possible sires in parentage tests was about 77% both for Romney Marsh and Romney/ Booroola flocks. Although parentage tests in sheep have not been enforced in Brazil up to now, the establishment of this technique is important for the prevention of non-paternity on the excellent rams.

Sheep; genetic potymorphisms; paternity tests


Investigou-se a variabilidade genética em 22 locos proteicos em uma amostra de 22 fêmeas Romney-Marsh e em 142 animais resultantes do cruzamento entre Romney-Marsh e Merino Booroola, criados pela Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMPRAPA, Bagé, RS, Brasil). Oito destes sistemas mostraram-se polimórficos, os demais não apresentando variação. Avaliou-se a eficiência destes oito sistemas proteicos polimórficos (Cat, DIA I, EP-1. EsA, HbB, ME, Tf e Prot. X ), no controle de filiação. A probabilidade de identidade entre dois animais retirados ao acaso da população foi estimada em 1:1000 em cada rebanho. A eficiência destes marcadores genéticos em excluir um entre dois possíveis pais foi de cerca de 77% tanto para os animais Romney Marsh como para os Romney/ Booroola. Testes de controle de paternidade, em ovinos, não têm sido realizados, até agora, no Brasil, mas o estabelecimento desta técnica seria importante para assegurar a paternidade da descendência de reprodutores zootecnicamente superiores.

Ovinos; polimorfismos genéticos; testes de paternidade


BIOCHEMICAL POLYMORPHISMS IN SHEEP AND THEIR POTENTIAL USE FOR PATERNITY TESTS.

POLIMORFISMOS BIOQUIMICOS EM OVINOS E A POSSIBILIDADE DE SUA UTILIZAÇÃO EM TESTES DE PATERNIDADE.

Luiz Ernani Henkes1 1 Veterinarian, MSc, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Caixa Postal, 15053. 91501 -970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Tania de Azevedo Weimer2 1 Veterinarian, MSc, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Caixa Postal, 15053. 91501 -970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. José Carlos Ferrugem de Moraes3 1 Veterinarian, MSc, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Caixa Postal, 15053. 91501 -970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

SUMMARY

The genetic variability of 22 protein loci was investigated in two sheep flocks: 22 females Romney Marsh and 124 animals derived from crossbreeding between Romney Marsh and Merino Booroola, reared by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária -EMBRAPA, Bagé, RS, Brazil). Eight loci were polymorphic; the others showed no variation. The usefulness of the eight plymorphic systems (Cat, DIA I, EP-1, EsA, HbB, ME, Tf, and X Prot.) in parentage tests was analyzed. The probability to find two random identical animals in each breed was estimated as 1:1000. The efficiency of these proteins for exclusion of one of two possible sires in parentage tests was about 77% both for Romney Marsh and Romney/ Booroola flocks. Although parentage tests in sheep have not been enforced in Brazil up to now, the establishment of this technique is important for the prevention of non-paternity on the excellent rams.

Key words: Sheep, genetic potymorphisms, paternity tests.

RESUMO

Investigou-se a variabilidade genética em 22 locos proteicos em uma amostra de 22 fêmeas Romney-Marsh e em 142 animais resultantes do cruzamento entre Romney-Marsh e Merino Booroola, criados pela Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (EMPRAPA, Bagé, RS, Brasil). Oito destes sistemas mostraram-se polimórficos, os demais não apresentando variação. Avaliou-se a eficiência destes oito sistemas proteicos polimórficos (Cat, DIA I, EP-1. EsA, HbB, ME, Tf e Prot. X ), no controle de filiação. A probabilidade de identidade entre dois animais retirados ao acaso da população foi estimada em 1:1000 em cada rebanho. A eficiência destes marcadores genéticos em excluir um entre dois possíveis pais foi de cerca de 77% tanto para os animais Romney Marsh como para os Romney/ Booroola. Testes de controle de paternidade, em ovinos, não têm sido realizados, até agora, no Brasil, mas o estabelecimento desta técnica seria importante para assegurar a paternidade da descendência de reprodutores zootecnicamente superiores.

Palavras-chave: Ovinos, polimorfismos genéticos, testes de paternidade.

INTRODUCTION

A correct identification of farm animals is important to assure the paternity of animais presumed to be offspring of selected sires, for artificial insemination and to identify donors in embryo transfer programs. Blood genetic polymorphisms are useful tools for this purpose, mainly due to their monogenic inheritance and the fact that they can be precise and easily identified.

Many polymorphisms have been described in sheep (TUCKER, 1971; MANWELL & BAKER, 1977); however, their utilization in pedigree identification is restricted to some foreign countries (HALL, 1975; HOJNY & STRATIL, 1978), with no references in Brazil. In the present investigation we determined the efficiency of some protein systems for parentage control in two sheep flocks from Rio Grande de Sul, Brazil.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The genetic variability at 22 loci was investigated in a sample of 22 females from a Romney Marsh flock and 124 animals derived from crossbreeding between Romney Marsh and Merino Booroola, reared by the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária -EMBRAPA, Bagé, RS, Brazil).

Blood samples were obtained by puncture of the jugular vein, placed in tubes with ACD, refrigerated shortly after collection and immediately carried to the laboratory, where the red cells were separated, washed in saline and glycerolized according to WEIMER et al. (1981). Plasma and red cells were stored at -20°C until the tests, which were mainly performed by electrophoresis.

The following proteins were typed using methods described or referenced elsewhere (HENKES et al.,1994): acid phosphatase - ACP, albumin - Alb, arylesterase - EsA, carbonic anhydrase - CA, catalase-Cat, ceruloplasmin - Cp, erythrocyte protein 1 - EP-1, esterases B and D - EsB and EsD loci, glucose phosphate isomerase - GPI. glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase - G6PD, glyoxalase I - GLO, hemoglobin - HbA and HbB loci, malic enzyme - ME, NADH diaphorase - DIA I and DIA II loci, phosphogluconate dehydrogenase - PGD, slow alpha-2 macroglobulin, superoxide dismutase - SOD, transferrin - Tf and X protein - X Prot.

Allelic designations were assumed from published descriptions except for Alb and Tf which were compared with international standards.

Gene frequencies were calculated by the gene-counting method for the codominant systems or by assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for the dominant loci.

The probability that two individuals chosen at random in a population will have the same genotype was calculated according to VAN ZEVEREN et al. (1990) and the exclusion probabilities of an incorrectly alleged parent were calculated according to OISHI & ABE (1970, 1975).

For the crossbred sheep sample we had complete genealogic information; in these cases we checked the assigned parentage to compare the expected and observed exclusion probabilities of each protein system. When exclusion was observed the protein were retested with the samples from sire, dam and lamb side by side on the same electrophoresis gel to discard laboratory errors.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Table I shows the gene frequencies observed in eight polymorphic systems in both flocks. The other proteins were all monomorphic. In general, the degree of variability was similar to those described thus far for other sheep breeds (TUCKER,1971; MANWELL & BAKER,1977).

Table II

Considering the eight polymorphic systems, the estimate of the probability that two individuais chosen at random will have similar genotypes was made and gave a value 0.001 for both flocks. This result suggests a good efficiency of these systems in identifying animals since the odds of finding at random two identical animals is highly improbable for both flocks.

According to GÜNDEL & REETZ (1981), the probability of detecting false parents depends on the number of systems investigated, on the number of alleles per system, and on the allele frequencies in the breed or population which the animals belong to. As can be seen, the efficiency observed was low in the dominant systems but increased in the others, reaching the maximum value of 35-41% in Tf due to its high variability. Similar results were also obtained by STRATIL (1974) who found values ranging from .40 to .56 for Tf and .12 to .18 for HbB, with a mean exclusion probability of 57% in Czechoslovakian sheep breeds. If we compare the results of probabilities obtained in our data with those obtained using the same proteins and the gene frequencies described by MANWELL & BAKER (1977) for Poll Dorset and Australian Merino sheep, we verify similar results. This is a reflex of the good efficiency of these systems in pedigree verifications. Notwithstanding the possibility to predict an extensive use of the polymorphic systems studied here for pedigree controls is limited because the knowledge about allele frequencies in the various sheep breeds in Brazil is sparse.

Using the genealogic information about the animals of the Romney/Booroola flock, it was possible to identify 35 groups (sire, dam and lamb). Five parentage exclusions were made among them, corresponding to 14% of the cases (Table III). As can be seen, one of these was a mother exclusion that was probably due to an error in animal identification. In the other exclusions there was not a good agreement between the estimated and observed exclusion efficiency. However, the small number of cases studied does not allow to attribute greater significancy to this discrepancy. These data are similar to those found by HALL (1975) (16% of exclusions) and HOJNY & STRATIL (1978) (8-20% of false offspring). This result is however surprisingly high if we consider that we investigated two experimental controlled flocks carefully managed. In extensive breeding it is possible to found higher values which could therefore delay the improvement programmes.

It may be concluded that the systems investigated in this study can be useful for routine pedigree verification. The inclusion of other informative systems and blood groups, will probably increase the efficiency of parentage tests to values near the maximum (100%). It is important to point out that the knowledge of genetic variability also allows to estimate, in absence of exclusion, the relative chance of patemity (paternity index) in order to avoid incorrect pedigrees in data banks of breeding organizations. Private farmers could employed also this methodology to improve animal production.

Parentage tests in sheep have not been enforced in Brazil up to now, but the establishment of this technique is important for the prevention of non-paternity on excelent flock.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are grateful to Dr. E. M. Tucker for providing standard patterns of Alb and Tf. This work was supported by CNPq, EMBRAPA, FAPERGS, FINEP and PROPESP/UFRGS.

2Geneticist. PhD., Departamento de Genética, UFRGS.

3Veterinarian, PhD., Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Centro de Pesquisa de Pecuária dos Campos Sul-Brasileiros (EMBRAPA/CPPSUL), Caixa Postal 242. 96400-970, Bagé, RS.

Received for publication: 10.03.94. Accepted: 07.06.94.

  • GÜNDEL, H., REETZ, I. Exclusion probabilities obtainable by biochemical polymorphisms in dogs. Anim Blood Grps Biochem Genet, v. 12, p. 123-132, 1981.
  • HALL, J.G. Blood groups In sheep. Vet Rec, v. 96, p. 400-401,1975.
  • HENKES, L. E., WEIMER, T.A., MORAES, J.C.F.Genetic markers and the fertility gene (FecB) in a 3/4 Romney Marsh x 1/4 Merino Booroola flock. Small Ruminam Research (in press), 1994.
  • HOJNY, J., STRATIL, A. Report on the pig and sheep blood group and polymorphic protein Workshops. Anim Blood Grps Biochem Genet, v. 9, p. 245-251, 1978.
  • MANWELL, C., BAKER, C. M. A. Genetic distance between the Australian Merino and Poll Dorset sheep. Genet ResCamb, v. 29, p. 239-253, 1977.
  • OISHI, T., ABE, T. Studies on blood groups in pigs. IV. Usefulness of blood groups and serum protein types for parentage tests. Jap J Zootech Sci, v. 41, p. 501-506, 1970.
  • OISHI, T., ABE, T. On the factors having an important effect upon the probability of solving parentage test in animals using blood groups and protein types. Jap J Zootech Sci, v. 46, p. 1-5,1975.
  • STRATIL, A. Polymorphism of transferrin and albumin in sheep and application of polymorphic proteins in the parentage control. Zivocisná Vyroba, v. 19, p. 545-554, 1974.
  • TUCKER, E. M. Genetic variation in the sheep red blood cell. Biol Rev, V. 46, p. 341-386, 1971.
  • VAN ZEVEREN, A., BOUQUET, Y, VAN DE WEGHE, A., COPPIETERS, W. A genetic blood marker study on four pig breeds. I. Estimation and comparison of within-breed variation. J Anim Breed Genet, v. 107, p. 104-112,1990.
  • WEIMER T.A., SALZANO F.M., HUTZ M.H., 1981. Erythrocyte isozymes and hemoglobin types in a southern Brazilian population. J Hum Evol, v. 10, p. 319-328, 1981.
  • 1
    Veterinarian, MSc, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Caixa Postal, 15053. 91501 -970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      25 Aug 2014
    • Date of issue
      Dec 1994

    History

    • Accepted
      07 June 1994
    • Received
      10 Mar 1994
    Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
    E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br