SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.50 issue2Effects of different concentrations of sodium azide and chloramphenicol on the preservation of raw milk samplesRice farmer’s poverty and its determinants: evidence from Dogofiri village of Office du Niger zone in Mali author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • text new page (beta)
  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Ciência Rural

Print version ISSN 0103-8478On-line version ISSN 1678-4596

Cienc. Rural vol.50 no.2 Santa Maria  2020  Epub Mar 13, 2020

https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20190093 

FOOD TECHNOLOGY

Phosphorylated protein concentrate pumpkin seed (Cucurbita moschata): optimization by response surface methodology and nutritional characterization

Concentrado proteico fosforilado de semente de abóbora (Cucurbita moschata): otimização pela metodologia de superfície resposta e caracterização nutricional

Naglezi de Menezes Lovatto1  * 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5226-6957

Bruno Bianchi Loureiro1 

Ana Betine Beutinger Bender2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6973-9127

Cristiane Bianchi Loureiro3 

Fernanda Rodrigues Goulart1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-0132

Caroline Sefrin Speroni2 

Fernanda Teixeira Macagnan2 

Mariana Piana4 

Leila Picolli da Silva1 

1Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

2Departamento de Solo, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

3Departamento de Tecnologia dos Alimentos , Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.

4Departamento Farmácia Industrial, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brasil.


ABSTRACT:

Response surface methodology was used to determine optimum conditions for extraction of protein from pumpkin seed meal. A central composite rotational design (CCRD) including independent variables such, pH and sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP) content was used. Maximum yield was obtained at a central point of CCRD, with STMP content and pH of 4% and 4.5, respectively. These conditions resulted in protein yield of 50.04 g of soluble protein from extract/100 g pumpkin seed. The optimization of pH and STMP content allowed obtaining a product with a high protein concentration (62.56 g 100 g-1), digestibility (62.03 g 100 g-1) and concentration of essential amino acids (27.26 g 100 g-1). Regarding the polyphenols concentration, phosphorylated protein concentrate from pumpkin seed and the pumpkin seed meal presented 13.11 g 100 g-1 and 23.19 g 100 g-1, respectively. The adequacy of the model was confirmed by extracting the protein under optimum values. These results help in designing the process of optimal protein extraction from pumpkin seeds.

Key words: amino acids; central composite rotational design; in vitro digestibility; new ingredient

RESUMO:

A metodologia de superfície resposta foi utilizada para determinar condições ideais para a extração de proteína da farinha de semente de abóbora. Foi utilizado um delineamento composto central rotacional (DCCR), incluindo vários níveis independentes, tais como pH e trimetafosfato de sódio (TMPS). O rendimento máximo foi obtido em um ponto central de DCCR, com conteúdo de TMPS e pH de 4% e 4,5, respectivamente. Essas condições resultaram em rendimento proteico de 50,04 g de proteína solúvel no extrato/100 g de semente de abóbora. A otimização de pH e conteúdo de TMS permitiu a obtenção de um produto com alta concentração de proteína (62,56 g 100 g-1), digestibilidade proteica (62,03 g 100 g-1) e concentração de aminoácidos essenciais (27,26 g 100 g-1). Em relação à concentração de polifenois, o concentrado proteico fosforilado de semente de abóbora e a farinha de semente de abóbora apresentaram 13,11 g 100 g-1 e 23,19 g 100 g-1, respectivamente. A adequação do modelo foi confirmada pela extração da proteína sobvalores ótimos. Estes resultados auxiliam na concepção do processo de extração ótimo da proteína de semente de abóbora.

Palavras-chave: aminoácidos; delinemamento composto central rotacional; digestibilidade in vitro; novo ingrediente

INTRODUCTION:

Food processing generates large quantities of new ingredients, which are under-used or discarded as agro-industrial waste (HELKAR et al., 2016). These wastes contain a high density of proteins, lipids and carbohydrates with potential for nutritional application (GUPTA, 2013). A strategy of bioremediation to reduce the environmental impact is to convert these materials in important food resources (EL-ADAWY, 2000).

In Brazil, agro-industrial produces a large variety of by-products and wastes, which have high nutritional potential. Pumpkins (Cucurbita moschata) are used for jam and candy preparations. Although, peels and seeds are usually discarded, the seeds are promising sources of protein. The protein content of pumpkin varies from 24.5% to 36% (WANG et al., 2001). They are also rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (oleic and linoleic) and have high fiber content (ESUOSO et al., 1998; YOUNIS et al., 2000; KIM et al., 2012).

However, the anti-nutritional factors (ANF’s) present in pumpkin seeds, as polyphenols, flavonoids and tannins limit their use in food formulations (DEL-VECHIO et al., 2005). In addition, the physical parameters, which are greatly influenced by the selection of raw materials (DRAGANOVIC et al., 2011). Current chemical treatments are driven by need to reduce ANF’s of pumpkins (C. moschata). The technique of phosphorylation with sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP) can be applied to plant food sources for protein concentration and modification of amino acid profile (ELLINGER, 1972). Whereas research to improve the protein pumpkin seed profile are scarce, it is worth studying the optimum conditions of phosphorylation with STMP to protein extraction from pumpkin seeds and obtainment of protein concentrate.

The procedure of chemical phosphorylation can be further optimized by statistical response surface methodology (RSM). Its use provides the relevant information in the shortest time with the least number of experiments (MYERS & MONTGOMERY, 2002). In addition to analyze the effects of the independent variables, this experimental methodology generates a mathematical model which describes the chemical or biochemical processes (BAS & BOYACI, 2007) using various parameters such as pH, temperature, solvent type, extraction time and solvent/meal ratio affect protein extractability (WANI et al., 2006).

In the present study, RSM was employed to optimize the protein extraction process from pumpkins seeds for maximum yield. The parameters investigated were pH and STMP concentration, aiming the nutritional characterization of the obtained product.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The pumpkin seeds (Cucurbita moschata), courtesy of the company Ritter Alimentos S.A. from Cachoeirinha, RS, Brazil, were washed in distilled water to remove excess pulp, dried by hot-air drying at 45 °C to achieve a final water content of less than 10%. After dehydration, seeds were grounded (particles<1 mm) in a cooled micro-mill (MA-630, Marconi®). The oil sample was extracted with Hexane (P.A. FMaia, Brazil) in the ratio 2:1 (hexane: sample) in three sequential washes. Finally, supernatant was discarded and precipitate resulted in pumpkin seed meal used to obtain the protein concentrates.

Extraction of protein concentrates was performed according to SMITH et al. (1946) with modifications. Phosphorylation was performed following the method of YAMADA et al. (2003). The procedure of protein concentration and phosphorylation is shown in figure 1. STMP was added to the pumpkin seed meal (PSM) according to the statistical design and the mixture was suspended in ten parts of distilled water. The solution was processed for three minutes in a blender (model LIQ789, Cadence, Brazil) and sieved in a 140 µm mesh. The fraction retained on the sieve was suspended following in distilled water at a ratio of 1:10. This procedure was repeated until a ratio of 1:30 (PSM): distilled water was obtained at the end of processing. The three aqueous fractions were combined to obtain a single sample, NaOH 1 M was added until pH 9.5 to obtain solubilized protein.

Figure 1 Organization chart of obtainment of the phosphorylated protein concentrate from pumpkin seed meal. 

The solution was allowed to stand for 30min at room temperature and the pH was adjusted with H3PO4 (extra pure, 85%) according to the statistical design. The solution was conditioned overnight at 8 °C to settle dispersed protein fraction, after the supernatant was discarded and the concentrated protein fraction was dried in an oven with air circulation at 50 °C (approximately 24 h).

The protein concentration results were analyzed using the software Statistica® 7.0 (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), with a 95% significance. The effects for sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP) concentration (1.88 - 6.12% v/w) and pH - phosphoric acid - H3PO4 (2.67 - 6.05) in yield of protein extraction and crude protein content from the phosphorylation were assessed by central composite rotational design (CCRD) with 8 runs and 3 central points.

The yield of the samples was calculated by the mass (g) of pumpkin seed meal used and the mass (g) generated after the concentration procedure and chemical modification of the protein using the formula: Y (%) = initial product weight (g) x protein concentrate weight (g) / 100, where Y represents the yield of the protein concentrate.

The crude protein was analyzed by determining total nitrogen by the micro Kjeldahl method using a conversion factor of 6.25 (N x 6.25), according to methodology n. 920.87 - AOAC (2000).

The protein concentrate obtained at pH 4.5 and 4% STMP concentration was compared to pumpkin seed meal (raw material for obtaining the protein concentrate) for nutrients contents, amino acid composition, anti-nutritional factors, functional properties and in vitro protein digestibility.

Dry matter (DM), ash and crude protein (determination of nitrogen by the micro Kjeldahl method - N x 6.25, number 920.87) were determined according to the methodologies described by AOAC (2000). Residual fat was extracted and quantified by the cold extraction method (BLIGH & DYER, 1959). The amount of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was measured according to VAN SOEST et al. (1991).

For calcium and phosphorus analysis digestion was performed with concentrated H2SO4 plus the catalytic mixture of copper sulfate and potassium sulfate (375 ºC for 4.5 h). The reading was held in atomic absorption spectrophotometry for calcium and in the area of the visible for phosphorus (colorimetric reaction of ammonium molybdate with phosphorus in the presence of reducing agent, using K2HPO4 as a standard (BAGINSKI et al., 1982).

The water holding capacity (WHC) and oil holding capacity (OHC) of the samples were determined as described by McCONELL et al. (1974). Samples were hydrated in distilled water (for WHC) or soy oil (for OHC). After equilibrium (24h) and centrifugation (1,300 x g for 20 min), excess supernatant was discarded. Results were expressed as amount of water or oil by the sample (g g-1).

Polyphenol content was measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu method described by CHANDRA & MEJIA (2004). The data were expressed accordance with the acid gallic equivalent (GAE) presents in a mass of crude extract (mg g-1). The content of flavonoids was determined by the reaction with aluminum chloride using the method described by WOISKY & SALATINO (1998). The data were calculated based on the calibration rutin curve and expressed in rutin equivalents (RE) mg g-1 of extract.

The determination of condensed tannins was performed by the MORRISSON et al. (1995) method, which used vanillin as reagent. The absorbance of 500nm was measured by spectrophotometer. Data were calculated based on the calibration catechin curve and expressed in catechin equivalents (CE) mg g-1of each one of the fractions.

In vitro digestibility of protein assay was performed as proposed by MAURON (1973), with modifications proposed by DIAS et al. (2010). The method is based on the digestion of the sample by the enzymes pepsin (1:10.000, Nuclear) and pancreatin (Sigma). The digestibility results from the relationship between the total nitrogen in the sample, the digested nitrogen, and the nitrogen produced by the auto digestion of the enzymes and the soluble nitrogen originally in the ingredient. For this reaction 10mL of HCl 0.1 N and 4 mg of pepsin (dilution in HCl 0.1 N) were added to the defatted sample (100mg) at the ratio 10:1 (w/v). Samples were kept in a water bath at 37 ºC under constant stirring for 1 h. The pH was adjusted at 7.0 (NaOH 0.4 N), 20mg of pancreatin (diluted in sodium phosphate buffer 0.1 M pH 8.5 at the ratio1: 10 (w/v) were added to each sample. Samples were kept at 37 ºC and stirred for 3h. The reaction was stopped with trichloroacetic acid (final concentration 5%). A 2 mL portion was removed for the determination of total nitrogen in the sample and the remaining fraction was centrifuged (10,000 rpm, 10 min) and digested nitrogen was analyzed. For each sample, a blank was accomplished using water instead of the enzyme, in order to verify the soluble nitrogen in the sample and for nitrogen content from enzymatic auto-digestion are considered. The nitrogen content of each fraction is determined by the Micro Kjeldahl method (AOAC, 2000). Casein was adopted as the standard (Synth, Brazil, 90% purity) to compare sample digestibility.

The amino acid profile was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with hydrolysis of samples in HCl 6M solution. The released amino acids were derivatized with phenylisothiocyanate (PITC) and separated with reverse phase column C18 (Pico-Tag - 3.9x300 mm) and UV detection at 254 nm, by the methodology proposed by WHITE et al. (1986).

For the CCRD, a second order polynomial equation was used to adjust the data in table 1, according to the model:

Table 1 Central composite rotational design (CCRD) and responses of yield and crude protein content obtained in different combinations of sodium trimetaphosphate (STMP) and pH. 

Run STMP (g 100g-1)1 pH Y(%)2 CP(%)3
1 2.50 (-1) 3.20 (-1) 44.33 60.04
2 5.50 (1) 3.20 (-1) 40.80 65.28
3 2.50 (-1) 5.60 (1) 36.66 64.59
4 5.50 (1) 5.60 (1) 42.54 59.23
5 4.00 (0) 4.50 (0) 49.34 62.08
6 4.00 (0) 4.50 (0) 50.04 62.06
7 4.00 (0) 4.50 (0) 49.68 62.56
8 1.88 (-1.41) 4.50 (0) 42.0 64.14
9 6.12 (1.41) 4.50 (0) 47.36 59.98
10 4.00 (0) 2.67 (-1.41) 45.76 62.19
11 4.00 (0) 6.05 (1.41) 37.76 64.81

1STMP - Sodium TrimetaPhosphate; 2 Yield; 3 CP - Crude protein.

Yi=a0+a1X1+a2X2+a11X12+a22X22+a12X1X2 (1)

Where Y i (i = 1-2) is the predicted response for the values of crude protein (CP%) and yield (Y%) of the protein concentrate. The term α0 is the response obtained in the design central point, α1 and α2 are the linear terms, α12 is the interaction of the effects and α11 and α22 are the quadratic effects. The experimental and predicted responses were compared. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) to validate the statistical model. Graphical and regression analysis were performed using the statistical software Statistica® 7.0 (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA) with a significance level of 95% (P<0.05).

Nutritional, ANF’s, functional analysis data and in vitro digestibility protein were subjected to one way ANOVA and F test for comparison were run at the 5% probability level by Tukey’s test. The mathematical model is described: Yij = m + ti + eij, where Yij represents observed value of variable Y in the experimental unit that received treatment i in the repetition j; m = constant ti = effect of the treatment i; eij = experimental error.

RESULTS:

The highest yield of protein extraction and the better crude protein content, considering 11 runs of the CCRD, were 50.04% and 65.28%, respectively (Table 1). Linear effects for STMP was statistically significant, but negative, with 90% of significance (P<0.1), while the linear effect for pH and the interaction effect between STMP and pH was not statistically significant (Figure 2a).

Figure 2 Pareto chart (A) and contour plot (B) expressing the effects of variables to yield of protein extraction by phosphorylation of pumpkin seed; (Q): quadratic; (L): linear. STMP: Sodium trimetaphosphate (g 100g-1) x pH (phosphoric acid used). 

The highest protein extraction yield (50.04 g 100g-1) was obtained in experiment 6, for STMP concentration of 4.00 g 100g-1 and pH 4.5, followed by the experiment 5 (49.68 g 100g-1) at level 0 of the CCRD for STMP concentration and pH. The quadratic effects for STMP concentration and pH were statistically significant (P<0.05), all of them negatives. The negative effects of quadratic terms are related to a presence of maximum point for each variable within the studied range. To identify these maximum points an empirical model was generated considering the significant terms plus the interaction of STMP concentration and pH, which is presented in the Equation below:

Y%=49.67-3.03P2-4.49 S2 +1.24P-2.15S+2.32 PS (2)

Where Y% is the yield of extraction protein (g 100g-1) obtained by the phosphorylation from pumpkin seeds, P, and S are the coded variables to pH and STMP concentration, respectively. This model was validated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the determination coefficient (R2) was 0.9242. The applicability of the second order polynomial equation is presented in figure 2, where it is seen that maximum yield of hydrolysis can be obtained around of central point of each variable.

Only linear effects of available variables were statistically significant (Figure 3). The interaction between pH and STMP concentration was statistically significant, but showed a negative effect on crude protein content. In the same way that protein extraction yield obtained from phosphorylation of pumpkin seeds, was generated an empirical model from data of table 1, but this model was not validated by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and, for this reason, it was not presented here.

Figure 3 Pareto chart expressing the effects of variables on the percentage of crude protein by phosphorylation of pumpkin seeds; (Q): quadratic; (L): linear; STMP: Sodium trimetaphosphate (g 100g-1); pH phosphoric acid use. 

The use of phosphorylation produced a new ingredient with 53.5% higher protein content than its original raw material and equivalent to the reference standard of animal-based protein sources (Table 2). The total fat content was lower (P<0.05) for the pumpkin seed meal (2.9%) when compared to PPCPS (about 9%). The fiber (NDF) content was 33.79% lower for PPCPS than its original raw material (PSM). The levels of phosphorus (P<0.05) were higher for PPCPS. The increase in the ash content (P<0.05) in PPCPS was observed.

Table 2 Composition of pumpkin seed meal (PSM) and phosphorylated protein concentrate from pumpkin seed meal (PPCPS). 

Nutrient PSM1 PPCPS2
----------------------------g/100g of the dry matter (DM)---------------------------
Crude protein 44.48±1.34b 67.48±2.75a
Lipid 3.06±0.06b 10.30±0.29a
NDF 37.17±0.91a 12.53±1.88b
Calcium 0.32±0.09c 0.67±0.08b
Phosphorus 1.00±0.13c 7.33±0.40a
Ash 9.92±1.76c 27.78±2.26a
Polyphenols 23.19±0.46a 13.11±0.26b
Flavonoids 13.55±0.25a 12.39±0.25a
WHC (g water g product-1) 1.99±0.17b 1.68±0.05c
OHC (g oil g product-1) 1.60±0.01a 0.72±0.01b
In vitro protein digestibility3 23.06±6.85b 62.03±1.74a

Mean values followed by different letters in the row were considered significantly different using the Tukey’s test (P<0.05). 1PSM - Pumpkin Seed Meal; 2PPCPS - Phosphorylated Protein Concentrate of Pumpkin Seed meal; 3Casein was used as standard protein: digestibility of 769.2g kg-1.

The high WHC (P<0.05) of PSM were attributed to their higher content of polar amino acids when compared to PPCPS. The OHC was higher for PSM than PPCPS (P<0.05), with similar behavior to the hydration capacity (Table 2).

The phosphorylation procedure is ineffective in reducing flavonoids. However, it caused a decrease (P<0.05) of 56.53% in total polyphenol content for PPCPS (13.11mg g-1) when compared to the PSM (23.19mg g-1) (Table 2). In this study, condensed tannins compounds were not detected in samples.

PSM showed low protein digestibility in vitro (Table 2). The PPCPS showed higher content of essential amino acids (P<0.05) than PSM (Table 3).

Table 3 Total amino acid composition of meal (PSM) and phosphorylated protein concentrate from pumpkin seed (PPCPS). 

Amino acids PSM1 PPCPS2
---------------------------------g/100 g of the raw matter---------------------------------
Isoleucine 1.17 2.00
Leucine 2.07 3.67
Lysine 1.72 1.72
Methionine 0.64 1.12
Cystine 0.36 0.51
Tyrosine 2.21 1.99
Phenylalanine 1.51 2.78
Threonine 0.85 1.48
Valine 1.55 2.65
Tryptophan NA NA
Histidine 0.82 1.10
Arginine 5.02 8.24
Total essential AA 17.92 27.26
Asparagine 3.97 5.22
Glutamine 5.97 9.50
Serine 1.85 2.85
Proline 1.17 2.98
Glycine 2.98 4.75
Histidine 0.82 2.10
Total 34.68 54.56

Mean values followed by different letters in the row were considered significantly different using the Tukey’s test (P<0.05). 1PSM - Pumpkin Seed Meal; 2PPCPS - Phosphorylated Protein Concentrate of Pumpkin Seed meal.

DISCUSSION:

Protein pumpkin seed was extracted following 11 combinations of two independent variables (pH and STMP content). Both pH and STMP content had a quadratic effect on protein extraction (Figure 2b). Considering all the response, it is evident that pH had a significant effect on protein yield. This statement is in accordance with the results obtained in runs 10 and 11, which the variation of pH (2.67 to 6.05) results in a decrease of protein yield of 45.76 to 37.76%, respectively MIEDZIANKA & PEKSA (2013) reported that a decrease of total protein content (96.32% to 88.87%) at pH 5.2 and 10.5, respectively, may be attributed to introduction of phosphate groups onto polypeptide chains and the solubilization under alkaline conditions.

Conversely, in our study the increase of pH resulted in a lower protein yield. In the same way, a study conducted by MIEDZIANKA & PEKSA (2013) showed that phosphorylation under alkaline condition (pH 10.5) was characterized by the lowest solubility of protein which can be attributed to polymerization of proteins. In despite of a previous study (GIEC et al., 1989) where the degree of protein phosphorylation studied range increases with increase of pH and STMP, in our study the pH of 4.5 stimulates the protein concentration and diminishes the occurrence of anti-nutritional compounds. The protein concentrates obtained demonstrate quite high contents of crude protein. It can be seen that the phosphorylation procedure increases extractability and facilities separation of protein from nucleic acids of yeast (GIEC et al., 1989).

Moreover, in our study the phosphorylation increased content of arginine, tyrosine, phenylalanine and valine, without decreasing the lysine content. This occurred because the N-P binding between lysine and the phosphate group in phosphorylation is acid labile. However, under conditions that prevailing in the stomach during the digestion process, the N-phosphorylated proteins are dephosphorylated and lysyl residues will be regenerated, without causing negative impact on the digestibility of lysine and other amino acids (DAMODARAN & PARKIN, 2019).

The amino acid composition of plant-based ingredients may vary depending on cultivars, culture treatments and industrial processing (LEDOUX et al., 1999; TAVERNARI et al., 2010). However, regardless of the variations, usually these sources are deficient in lysine and methionine (TUSCHE et al., 2011). The increase of these amino acids by phosphorylation showed that this technique is effective for concentration and increase quality of protein.

Phenolic compounds are anti-nutritional compounds that causing negative effects in color, flavor and nutritional quality of ingredients (SILVA & SILVA, 1999). The fiber reduction resulting of protein processing concentration promotes a decrease in the content of phenolic compounds, improving the nutritional and sensory characteristics of the ingredient. The low in vitro digestibility of proteins in PSM is associated with high fiber content (TORSTENSEN et al., 2008). The excess of fiber can be considered a negative point for digestibility of nutrients. However, raw vegetable ingredients, such as pumpkin seed meal, consist in great sources of fiber, protein and lipids, and can or cannot have success for animal nutrition.

The ANF’s have different characteristics related to chemical classification and conformation. This results in different forms to inactivate them, as well as synergy and / or antagonism of nutrients (NRC, 2011). In the PSM, higher levels of some antinutritional compounds, such as polyphenols, flavonoid, and fiber were observed (Table 2). However, the methodology applied for obtaining the protein concentrate showed to be efficient for reducing some of them. At the beginning, the sample is homogenized in an aqueous medium and the anti-nutritional compounds can be removed, as well as polyphenols and fiber. After the sample dispersion in water, the separation of protein (liquid medium) from the fiber portion (retained at the sieve) should be occurred, and the protein in aqueous medium is solubilized in alkaline medium (pH 9-10). In this point, the anti-nutritional compounds can be also removed, since the alkaline treatment is considered as an efficient method for reducing some of compounds (OCHANDA et al., 2010).

The reduction of fiber in pumpkin seeds by phosphorylation resulted in increased protein digestibility for PPCPS. Second MATHEIS et al. (1983), these results can be attributed to partial hydrolysis of the protein and amino acids caused by the chemical phosphorylation procedure.

The phosphorylation results showed a low water holding capacity (WHC). This behavior occurs because proteins exhibit the least hydration at their isoelectric pH, where enhanced protein-protein interactions results in minimal interaction with water (DAMODARAN & PARKIN, 2019). The study carried by DENCH et al. (1981) reported that absorption of fat depending on the number of protein hydrophobic groups exposed.

Ingredients with lower WHC require less water during the extrusion feed procedure. The lower WHC and OHC of the obtained PPCPS when compared to PSM may form pellets which require less water for extrusion, favoring energy consumption and low generation of residues (DRAGANOVIC et al., 2014).

The pumpkin seeds phosphorylation resulted in a concentrate product with low content of ANF’s and fiber, high protein digestibility and concentration of essential amino acids. The presence of ANF’s in protein concentrates may decrease the enzymatic hydrolysis of these proteins (DAMODARAN & PARKIN, 2010).

CONCLUSION:

In conclusion, response surface methodology (RSM) proved to be a useful tool establishing optimum conditions for extracting pumpkin seed protein. The second order model developed for protein yield exhibited a significant value for lack of fit and high value for the coefficient of determination. Optimum extraction of pumpkin seed proteins can be achieved by STMP concentration of 4.00% at pH 4.5. These conditions resulted in protein yield of 50.04g of soluble protein from extract 100g-1 pumpkin seed. Isolated product has a protein content of 67.48g 100g-1 DM. The optimum conditions can be used to produce protein concentrate from pumpkin seed.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The research was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brasil - Finance code 001.

REFERENCES

AOAC. Association of Analytical Chemists. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, Gaisthersburg, 17 ed., 2000, v.I e II. [ Links ]

BAGINSKI, E.S. et al. Phosphate, inorganic. In: BAGINSKI, E. S. (Ed.). Selected Methods of Clinical Chemistry. American Association of Clinical Chemistry, p.313-316, 1982. [ Links ]

BAS, D.B., BOYACI, I.H. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering, v.78, p.836-845, 2007. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024 >. Accessed: Oct. 08, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024. [ Links ]

BLIGH, E.G., DYER, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology, v.37, n.8, p.911-917, 1959. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099 >. Accessed: Jul. 20, 2016. doi: 10.1139/o59-099. [ Links ]

CHANDRA, S., MEJIA, E.G. Polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity, and quinone reductase activity of an aqueous extract of Ardisia compressa in comparison to mate (Ilex paraguariensis) and green (Camellia sinensis) teas. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, v.52, p.3583-3589, 2004. Available from: <Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15161234 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2016. doi: 10.1021/jf0352632. [ Links ]

DAMODARAN, S., PARKIN, K.L. Química de alimentos de Fennema. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2019. 1112p. [ Links ]

DEL-VECHIO, G. et al. 2005. Effect of the thermal processing on pumpkin seeds (Cucurbita spp.) on the levels of antinutritionales factors and/or toxics. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v.29, p.369-376, 2005. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000200014 >. Accessed: Nov. 05, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S1413-70542005000200014. [ Links ]

DENCH, J.E. et al. Selected functional properties of sesame (Sesame indicum L) flour and two protein isolates. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v.32, p.557-564, 1981. Available from: <Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.2740320606/full >. Accessed: Jul. 20, 2016. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740320606. [ Links ]

DIAS, D.R. et al. In vitro protein digestibility of enzymatically pre-treated bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flour using commercial protease and Bacillus sp. protease. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, v.30, p.94-99, 2010. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612010005000010 >. Accessed: Nov. 15, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612010005000010. [ Links ]

DRAGANOVIC, V. et al. Lupine and rapeseed protein concentrate in fish feed: A comparative assessment of the techno-functional properties using a shear cell device and an extruder. Journal of Food Engineering, v.126, p.178-189, 2014. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.013 >. Accessed: Jun. 03, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.013. [ Links ]

DRAGANOVIC, V. et al. Assessment of the effects of fish meal, wheat gluten, soy protein concentrate and feed moisture on extruder system parameters and the technical quality of fish feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.165, p.238-250, 2011. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.03.004 >. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.03.004. [ Links ]

ESUOSO, K. et al. Chemical composition and potential of some underutilized tropical biomass. I: fluted pumpkin (Telfairia occidentalis). Food Chemistry, v.61, p.487-492, 1998. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00096-4 >. Accessed: Sep. 14, 2016. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00096-4. [ Links ]

GIEC, A. et al. A protein isolate for food by phosphorylation of yeast homogenate. Food Chemistry, v.31, p.279-288, 1989. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(89)90069-1 >. Accessed: Jul. 20, 2016. doi: 10.1016/0308-8146(89)90069-1. [ Links ]

GUPTA, V.K., TUOHY, M.G. eds, Biofuel Technologies, Recent Developments. Ed. Springer, 2013, 534p. [ Links ]

HELKAR, B.P., SAHOO, A.K., PATIL, N.J. Review: Food Industry By-Products used as a Functional Food Ingredients. International Journal of Waste Resources, v.6, n.3, p.1-6, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://doi:10.4172/2252-5211.1000248 >. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2019. doi: 10.4172/2252-5211.1000248. [ Links ]

KIM, M.Y. et al. Comparison of the chemical compositions and nutritive values of various pumpkin (Cucurbitaceae) species and parts. Nutrition Research and Practice, v.6, n.1, p.21-27, 2012. Available from: <Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296918/ >. Accessed: Jun. 15, 2016. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2012.6.1.21. [ Links ]

LEDOUX, D.R. et al. Effects of feeding crambe meal upon intake, gain, health, and meat quality of broiler chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.76, p.227-240, 1999. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00225-9 >. Accessed: Jul. 02, 2016. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00225-9. [ Links ]

MATHEIS, G. et al. Phosphorylation of casein and lysozyme by phosphorus oxychloride. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v.31, p.379-387, 1983. Available from: <Available from: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jf00116a049 >. Accessed: Mar. 17, 2016. doi: 10.1021/jf00116a049. [ Links ]

MAURON, J. The analysis of food proteins: amino acid composition and nutritive value. In: PORTER, J.W.G. & ROLLS, B.A. eds., Proteins in human nutrition, London, Academic Press, 1973, p.139-154. [ Links ]

MCCONELL, A.A. et al. Physical characteristics of vegetable foodstuffs that could influence bowel function. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, v.25, p.1457-1464, 1974. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740251205 >. Accessed: Jun. 24, 2016. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740251205. [ Links ]

MIEDZIANKA, J., PĘKSA, A. Effect of pH on phosphorylation of potato protein isolate. Food Chemistry, v.138, p.2321-2326, 2013. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.12.028 >. Accessed: Mar. 30, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.12.028. [ Links ]

MORRISSON, I.M. et al. Determination of lignin and tannin contents of cowpea seed coats. Annals of Botany, v.76, p.287-290, 1995. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1097 >. Acessed: Aug. 24, 2016. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1097. [ Links ]

MYERS, R.H., MONTGOMERY, D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley-Interscience: 2nd Ed, 2002. [ Links ]

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL - NRC. Nutrient requirements of fish and shrimp. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2011. 360p. [ Links ]

OCHANDA S.O. et al. Effects of alkali treatment on tannins and phytates in red sorghum, white sorghum and pearl millet. Journal of Applied Biosciences, v.36, p.2409 - 2418, 2010. [ Links ]

SILVA, M.R., SILVA, M.A.A.P. Nutritional aspects of phytates and tannins. Revista de Nutrição, v.12, p.5-19, 1999. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-52731999000100002 >. Accessed: Nov. 26, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S1415-52731999000100002. [ Links ]

SMITH, A.K., JOHNSON, V.L., BECKEL, A.C. Linseed proteins alkali dispersion and acid precipitation. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, v.38, p.353-356, 1946. [ Links ]

TAVERNARI, F.C. et al. Nutritional and energetic evaluation of sunflower meal in broiler diets. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v.62, n.1, p.172-177, 2010. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000100023 >. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2017. doi: 10.1590/S0102-09352010000100023. [ Links ]

TORSTENSEN, B.E. et al. Novel production of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) protein based on combined replacement of fish meal and fish oil with plant meal and vegetable oil blends. Aquaulture, v.285, p.193-200, 2011. [ Links ]

TUSCHE, K. et al. Evaluation of feed attractants in potato protein concentrate based diets for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture, v.321, p.54-60, 2011. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.025 >. Accessed: Nov. 12, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.08.025. [ Links ]

VAN SOEST, P.J. et al. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, v.74, p.3583-3597, 1991. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 >. Accessed: Nov. 14, 2016. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2. [ Links ]

WANG, P., ZHAO, Q., WANG, R., CUI, S. The study on change of main nutrition during maturation process in seed pumpkin seed. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2001. Available from: <Available from: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YYXB200101009.htm >. Accessed: Apr. 30, 2019. [ Links ]

WANI, A.A. et al. Effect of temperature, alkali concentration, mixing time and meal/solvent ratio on the extraction of watermelon seed proteins - a response surface. Biosystems Engineering, v.94, n.1, p.67-73, 2006. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.004 >. Accessed: Oct. 23, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.02.004. [ Links ]

WHITE, J. et al. An evaluation of the Waters Pico-Tag system for the amino-acid-analysis of food materials. Journal of Automated Methods and Management in Chemistry, v.8, p.170-177, 1986. Available from: <Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2547673/ >. Accessed: Feb. 15, 2016. doi: 10.1155/S1463924686000330. [ Links ]

WOISKY, R.G., SALATINO, A. Analysis of propolis: some parameters and procedure for chemical quality control. Journal of Apicultural Research, v.37, p.99-105, 1998. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1998.11100961 >. Accessed: Jan. 28, 2016. doi: 10.1080/00218839.1998.11100961. [ Links ]

YAMADA, E.A. et al. Composição centesimal e valor proteico de levedura residual da fermentação etanólica e de seus derivados. Revista de Nutrição, v.16, p.423-432, 2003. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-52732003000400006 >. Accessed: Jun. 12, 2016. doi: 10.1590/S1415-52732003000400006. [ Links ]

YOUNIS, Y.M. et al. African Cucurbita pepo L.: properties of seed and variability in fatty acid composition of seed oil. Phytochemistry, v.54, p.71-75, 2000. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00610-X >. Accessed: Oct. 16, 2016. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(99)00610-X. [ Links ]

CR-2019-0093.R2

Received: February 06, 2019; Accepted: November 27, 2019; Revised: February 04, 2020

E-mail: naglezilovatto@hotmail.com. *Corresponding author

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors contributed equally for the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved of the final version.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License