Lantana flowering at an indoor active living wall in a light-restricted environment

Florescimento de Lantana em jardim vertical indoor em ambiente com restrição de luz

ABSTRACT:

The time spent by urban residents indoors has been increasing annually, thus, prioritizing the enhancement of indoor spaces into green spaces to improve the quality of life. Even with limited environmental conditions indoors, an active living wall and LED light techniques have enabled us to explore indoor green environments. In the present study, the yellow/orange-colored flowers invasive ornamental species,Lantana camara‘splendens’, was cultivated in 4.0 m² of the active living wall under a non-decorative LED lamp, adjusted to optimize performance in the coverage area. This study evaluated the development of lantana in the active living wall under different light intensities (135 watts and 90 watts) in a room with light restriction. Parameters such as plant height, flowering, SPAD chlorophyll content, and vegetative cover were analyzed. The results indicated that Lantana camara ‘splendens’ is suitable for use in active living walls and blooms at a low light intensity when the light is uniformly applied.

Key words:
flower culture; plasticity; ornamental; good health; Lantana camara L

RESUMO:

O tempo gasto pelos moradores urbanos em ambientes fechados vem aumentando anualmente, assim, priorizando a valorização dos espaços internos em espaços verdes para melhorar a qualidade de vida. Mesmo com condições ambientais limitadas em ambientes internos, o uso de jardins verticais e técnicas de luz de LED nos permitiram explorar ambientes verdes internos. No presente estudo, a espécie ornamental invasora de flores de coloração amarela/alaranjada, Lantana camara ‘splendens’, foi cultivado em 4,0 m² de jardim vertical sob luminária LED não decorativa, ajustada para otimizar a performance na área de cobertura. Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar o desenvolvimento da Lantana camara ‘splendens’, em jardim vertical, sob diferentes intensidades de luz (135 watts e 90 watts), em ambiente com restrição total de luz. Foram analisados parâmetros como altura da planta, floração, teor de clorofila SPAD e cobertura vegetativa. Os resultados indicam que Lantana camara ‘splendens’ é adequada para uso em jardim vertical e floresce em baixa intensidade de luz quando a luz é aplicada uniformemente.

Palavras-chave:
floricultura; plasticidade; ornamental; boa saúde; Lantana camara L

INTRODUCTION:

The cultivation of indoor plants using an active living wall (ALW) represents a technological advancement that can be applied in urban environments, such as malls and corporate companies. In addition to the beauty provided by natural plants, the use of indoor ALW improves the air quality (particles and VOC - volatile organic compounds - retention) and environmental conditions (temperature and humidity levels) and reduces noise pollution (GUNAWARDENA & STEEMERS, 2019; MOYA et al., 2019). Recently, the use of ALW in domestic environments has significantly increased due to extended family time at home. Home office activities, distance learning, and social restrictions due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic have greatly contributed to this change in habits; thus, ALW is the preferred option for the inclusion of green plants indoors (PÉREZ-URRESTARAZU et al., 2021). Additionally, renewing indoor esthetics has positive psychological effects on residents and workers (LOHR et al., 1996; QIN et al., 2014). However, the intensity of natural light in indoor environments is often insufficient for the complete development of ornamental plant species. Studies using artificial light, mainly LED light, have shown the different lighting options on the present market restrictions of indoor ALW plants (TAN et al., 2017; KALTSIDI et al., 2020).

Adjusting the light intensity (LI) is difficult because the position of the light source in ALW does not allow for uniform light distribution and harms the environmental esthetics (EGEA et al., 2014). Thus, plants that require a low LI are suitable for indoor ALW cultivation, making green tropical plants an ideal option (GUNAWARDENA & STEEMERS, 2019; KAZEMI et al., 2020). Plant colors can influence the behavior of indoor inhabitants. The use of green-yellow and light green colored species is recommended in relaxing and tranquil environments while dark red and green plants can improve the energy in workplaces and children’s areas (LINTON, 1999; ELSADEK & FUJII, 2014; ELSADEK et al., 2017). Most biodiversity studies on indoor ALW cultivation have been conducted on green plants while only a few studies have been conducted on species having flowers of varying colors. Lantana (Lantana camara L) has interesting characteristics for indoor ALW cultivation. Although, lantana is an invasive crop in landscape gardens, its cultivation in pots and benches is highly recommended (PASSOS et al., 2009; NEGI et al., 2019). This species has a great diversity of colors, is rustic in cultivation, and can be pruned if necessary. Furthermore, it responds well to variations in LI (MUTHAHARA et al., 2018; GOYAL & SHARMA, 2019). Thus, the present study evaluated, under a light-restrict environment, the effect of two different LIs of a non-decorative light lamp on growing Lantana camara ‘splendens’ in ALW.

The ornamental Lantana camara ‘splendens’ was selected due to its commercial value and yellow- and orange-colored flowers, which convey a feeling of well-being (LINTON, 1999). The study was performed in a room with light restriction (LR) maintained at a uniform temperature of 25 ^oC (±2 °C) and constant relative humidity of 60%. Two different LIs, 90 Watts = W90 and 135 Watts = W135, were evaluated using a non-decorative LED lamp, model Avena (ONNO^®,Piracicaba, Brazil), with characteristics and relative emission intensity spectra as shown in Figures 1A, B, and C. The LED lamp set from each treatment was arranged in the front and middle of the upper part of ALW with an adjustable metallic bar - 1.0 m from the module (Figure 1D). The angle between the bar and wall was 80°, and the angle between the LED lamp set and bar was 135^o. The adjustments were made to optimize performance in the coverage area (Figure 1E). The distributed LI was measured at 25 points of each ALW using a light meter LI-250A and quantum sensor LI-190R (Li-Cor, Nebraska, USA) to obtain the average density of photosynthetic photon flux (µmol m⁻² s^-1) (Figures 1F and G). The ALW modules were based on a commercial system (Vertigarden^®, Piracicaba, Brazil), with dimensions 1.0 m wide x 1.0 m high x 0.10 m deep. Each module structure comprised two synthetic layers, a hydrophobic layer of polypropylene alveolar anti-UV treatment (Brasken^®, São Paulo, Brazil) and overlapping layers of a non-putrescible hydrophilic felt screen (geotextile, 1.5 cm thick), forming 25 bags per m² (five rows and five columns), arranged equidistantly from the position of insertion of plants. The synthetic layers were clipped together on an aluminum layer (1.0 m wide x 1.0 m high) with press buttons (Figures 1D and E).

Figure 1
Led lamps used in the study and their characteristics- Graphs courtesy ONNO^® (A, B, and C); Layout of the experiment - Front view (D) and Elevation view (E); Light intensity - µmol m⁻² s^-1 - in different locations of ALW - W135 (F) and W90 (G).

A total of four modules were installed side by side (two for each LI) at a height of 0.8 m from the floor. Between the modules, an anti-reflective curtain (1.0 m x 0.5 m) was installed perpendicular to the wall, and a constant 12-h photoperiod was maintained. Fertigation by drippers located on top of the modules (5 drips m^-1 with a flow of 0.001 m³ h^-1) in a 15-min/4-h regimen was adjusted using a timer to an electric pump of 1.5 CV (Schneider BC-92S, flow of 0.10 m³h^-1). The liquid formulation (Vertigarden^® NPK 4-14-8 + Micronutrients) was adjusted to supply nutrients to the plants until they flowered (15 ml L^-1). The drained solution was collected via a common gutter installed at the base of the modules, and it was stored in a 0.05 m³ tank. Every two weeks, the solution used was replaced, and an EC of 1.3 and pH of 5.9 was maintained. Following this, a lantana plant with three stems (10.0 cm in height) was planted in each bag. After two weeks of the plantation, data on the plant height (from base to apex - cm), number of flowers per individual lantana, and photosynthetic activity (SPAD units, chlorofiLOGFalker^® SPAD-500, Porto Alegre, Brazil) were collected. Three measurements were taken per leaf in four leaves per plant of nine plants per module. The green cover evolution (RGB images) of each ALW module was evaluated from the same position. The fraction of the ALW area covered by the lantana plants was determined using ImageJ software (RUEDEN et al., 2017), separating the pixels corresponding to the green cover of the background. The experimental design used was completely randomized, with two LI treatments (W90 and W135) and 18 replicates each. These repetitions were evaluated at six different time intervals (I) of the plant cycle, with data being collected every 15 days for a total of 90 days. As these data did not meet the assumption of normality of the residuals, mixed generalized linear models were used. The results were analyzed using R software (version 4.0.3) and package lme4 (BATES et al., 2015). Posthoc pairwise contrasts between least square means were evaluated using the package emmeans (LENTH et al., 2022). All analyses were performed considering a confidence level of 0.05.

During the vegetative development of lantana, the plant height significantly differed from I1 to I4; conversely, there was no significant difference between I4 and I6. This was observed for the two LIs studied. When comparing LI, no significant difference was observed for any of the evaluated intervals (Table 1). LI did not cause etiolation, and from I4 onwards, the plant height stabilized. This result suggested that the LED lamp coverage area was adequate to maintain the plant height from I4 to I6. In field cultivation, Lantana camara ‘splendens’ responded to different LIs. Plants grown under 50% shade (1048 µmol m⁻²s^-1) showed twice the vegetative growth as compared to those grown under complete sunlight (2329 µmol m⁻²s^-1). Conversely, while comparing plants grown under full sun and 25% shading (1668 µmol m⁻²s^-1), no significant difference was observed in plant height (MUTHAHARA et al., 2018; GUNASEKARA & RANWALA, 2018). In the present research, the effective LIs were 146 µmol m⁻²s^-1 (W90) and 219 µmol m⁻²s^-1 (W135), with plants receiving approximately 50-70 µmol m⁻²s^-1 (W90) and 70-90 µmol m⁻²s^-1 (W135), respectively. In other words, despite the LI being approximately 25 times lower than that in the natural environment, the plants had good vegetative development. Additionally, in ALW, the plant growth was non-invasive, keeping plants in a good vegetative state without the occurrence of visual symptoms of nutritional deficiency. Possibly, the environmental conditions of LR room and the regular supply of water and nutrients provided minimal stress on the plants.

Table 1
Mean ± standard error of height (cm), number of flowers, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and green cover (%) in cultivation at lantana living wall, under LED light of 90 W and 135 W of power, after six evaluations.

Light source	-------------------------------------------------------Evaluation------------------------------------------------------				Average across evaluations
	1	2	3	4	5	6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Height--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
90 W	9.00 ± 0.37	12.50 ± 0.56	18.67 ± 0.77	22.97 ± 1.32	23.83 ± 1.17	24.72 ± 1.37	18.62 ± 0.70 a
135 W	9.61 ± 0.40	13.44 ± 0.70	18.44 ± 0.76	24.31 ± 1.13	25.67 ± 1.19	25.97 ± 1.39	19.57 ± 0.73 a
Average	9.31 ± 0.27 D	12.97 ± 0.45 C	18.56 ± 0.54 B	23.64 ± 0.86 A	24.75 ± 0.84 A	25.35 ± 0.97 A
p-values	0.3748 (light source); <0.0001 (evaluation); 0.5041 (interaction)
--------------------------------------------------------------------Number of flowers---------------------------------------------------------------------------
90 W	0.06 ± 0.06 Ca	1.44 ± 0.27 Ba	0.89 ± 0.28 Bb	3.61 ± 0.52 Aa	3.94 ± 0.55 Ab	3.72 ± 0.51 Aa	2.28 ± 0.22
135 W	0.11 ± 0.11 Ba	3.06 ± 0.48 Aa	2.72 ± 0.56 Aa	3.78 ± 0.45 Aa	4.44 ± 0.35 Aa	4.44 ± 0.35 Aa	3.10 ± 0.22
Average	0.08 ± 0.06	2.25 ± 0.30	1.81 ± 0.35	3.69 ± 0.34	4.19 ± 0.32	4.08 ± 0.31
p-values	0.0354 (light source); <0.0001 (evaluation); 0.0073 (interaction)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------Chlorophyll a----------------------------------------------------------------------------
90 W	289.47 ± 8.45	352.28 ± 9.46	376.92 ± 4.57	386.67 ± 2.38	407.08 ± 4.91	392.44 ± 4.67	367.48 ± 4.49 b
135 W	299.94 ± 8.86	377.92 ± 5.73	396.92 ± 5.43	398.33 ± 5.51	422.53 ± 4.42	407.89 ± 7.60	383;92 ± 4.63 a
Average	294.71 ± 6.10 D	365.10 ± 5.87 C	386.92 ± 3.88 B	392.50 ± 3.12 B	414.81 ± 3.51 A	400.17 ± 4.58 AB
p-values	0.0114 (light source); <0.0001 (evaluation); 0.7765 (interaction)
------------------------------------------------------------------------Chlorophyll b-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
90 W	61.47 ± 3.06	81.72 ± 3.54	97.61 ± 3.28	108.33 ± 1.88	113.83 ± 2.97	117.14 ± 3.66	96.69 ± 2.27 b
135 W	61.06 ± 2.60	89.19 ± 3.09	107.44 ± 4.31	120.61 ± 5.09	130.47 ± 5.26	140.67 ± 10.38	108.24 ± 3.45 a
Average	61.26 ± 1.98 E	85.46 ± 2.40 D	102.53 ± 2.80 C	114.47 ± 2.87 BC	122.15 ± 3.29 A	128.90 ± 5.78 AB
p-values	0.0376 (light source); <0.0001 (evaluation); 0.6213 (interaction)
----------------------------------------------------------------------Total Chlorophyll--------------------------------------------------------------------------
90 W	350.14 ± 11.61	433.94 ± 13.21	473.22 ± 7.83	494.42 ± 4.15	521.58 ± 7.56	509.67 ± 8.64	463.83 ± 6.73 b
135 W	361.42 ± 11.39	467.64 ± 8.60	503.28 ± 10.32	518.47 ± 10.80	553.72 ± 8.85	549.33 ± 17.19	492.31 ± 7.81 a
Average	355.78 ± 8.07 E	450.79 ± 8.27 D	488.25 ± 6.87 C	506.44 ± 6.05 BC	537.65 ± 6.35 A	529.50 ± 10.06 AB
p-values	0.0201 (light source); <0.0001 (evaluation); 0.9146 (interaction)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------Green Cover (%)--------------------------------------------------------------------------
90 W	34.50	61.80	76.48	87.80	90.57	93.82
135 W	40.73	71.21	84.87	92.84	93.32	98.09

• Uppercase letters compare different evaluations in time with the same light source, whereas lowercase letters compare different light sources in the same evaluation. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

At W90, no significant difference was observed between I1 and I2, and flowering remained stable between I2 and I3. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between I3 and I4 as well as I4 and I6. Conversely for W135, no significant difference was observed between I1 and I2, and no significant difference was observed in I2 until the end of the evaluation in I6. Thus, in W135, flowering was anticipated, and it resulted in a higher number of flowers as compared to W90, which was irregular. When comparing LI, a significant difference was observed between W90 and W135 in the intervals I2, I3, and I5, with a higher number of flowers in W135 than in W90 (Table 1). In addition, in the natural environment, the lantana wild cultivar produces more flowers in full sun than grown in shaded environments with low LI. It has been reported that wild cultivars showed a direct correlation between LI and flowering (MUTHAHARA et al., 2018; GOYAL & SHARMA, 2019). In the present study, the LIs studied (W90 and W135) are considered low when compared to a natural light environment, even in shade. Thus, the results indicated that Lantana camara ‘splendens’ responds to LI in ALW, even at low LIs.

In the evaluated pigments of chlorophyll a and total (SPAD index), a significant and increasing difference was observed in the SPAD index from I1 to I5, and it remained stable or with a significant and decreasing difference between I5 and I6. On the other hand, when comparing LI, a significant difference was observed at all evaluated time points, with a higher SPAD index for chlorophyll a and total in W135 than in W90. The same did not occur with the SPAD index for chlorophyll b, with no significant difference between different LIs (Table 1). In the full-sun natural environment, Lantana camara ‘splendens’ produces low levels of chlorophyll a and b when compared to shaded environments (GUNASEKARA & RANWALA, 2018). The production of high levels of chlorophyll a and b in shaded environments is the plastic response of this cultivar to optimizing light capture (VALLADARES & NIINEMETS, 2008). Additionally, in our study, the pigments chlorophyll a and total were directly proportional to the LI levels.

The green cover analyzed using ImageJ was superior in W135 at all time points. From I4 onwards, the panels had approximately 90% green cover for the two LIs evaluated (Table 1). Tests with different LED lamps on green plant species showed that the green cover was up to 80% of the LW for plants closer to the light source while in distant plants, they resulted in a green cover of 65%. In this case, the variations in the green cover rate were justified by the non-centered positioning of the light source (KALTSIDI et al., 2020).

In the present study, a non-decorative LED lamp covered a 1.0 m² panel area. This type of lamp, in the adjusted position with the panel, kept the plants growing uniformly, and the LI was sufficient for flowering in the LR environment. The favorable results justify an improvement in the engineering and esthetics of this type of LED lamp, thus, maintaining the lighting coverage area and dimming the luminous intensity. Recent studies have demonstrated reduced options for LED lamp system fixtures to meet the needs of flowering plants (KALTSIDI et al., 2020). An LED lamp system can be set up on the ceiling, and it can be activated using synchronized pneumatic mechanisms according to photoperiod and luminous intensity commanded via artificial intelligence.

The results obtained for Lantana camara ‘splendens’ in ALW confirmed the modulation capacity of this species in adapting to low LI environments. In some plant species, when they compete for essential resources for survival, especially limiting ones, they adapt to the new environment and induce changes in biomass allocation patterns for plant architecture, forming tissues to obtain the maximum benefit from available resources (VALLADARES & NIINEMETS, 2008). Thus, even at low LIs, differences were observed in flowering, chlorophyll a content, and total and green cover at the highest LI applied. This result is important because lantana showed plasticity at a minimum intensity of 50-70 µmol m⁻²s^-1. The adaptation of this species to indoor ALW cultivation at low LIs can help color the most varied indoor urban environments, thus, improving the quality of life in these environments.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS:

This research was supported by Luiz de Queiroz Foundation for Agrarian Studies (FEALQ-Vertigarden®/ONNO®) [first author grant] and was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brasil - Finance code 001. And also to João Geraldo Brancalion for figures and pictures.

REFERENCES

• BATES, D. et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015; 67(1), 1-48. Available from: <Available from: https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v067i01 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
  » https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.» https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v067i01
• EGEA, G. et al. Lighting systems evaluation for indoor living walls. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2014; v.13: p.475-483. Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866714000600 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.009.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.04.009.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866714000600
• ELSADEK, M., FUJII, E. People’s psycho-physiological responses to plantscape colors stimuli: A pilot study. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2014; v.4: p.70-78. Available from: <Available from: http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ijpbs.20140402.02.html >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.5923/j.ijpbs.20140402.02.
  » https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijpbs.20140402.02.» http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ijpbs.20140402.02.html
• ELSADEK, M. et al. Psycho-physiological responses to plant variegation as measured through eye movement, self-reported emotion and cerebral activity. Indoor and Built Environment, 2017; v.26: p.758-770. Available from: <Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1420326X16638711 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1177/1420326X16638711.
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16638711.» https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1420326X16638711
• GOYAL, N., SHARMA, G. P. It takes two to tango: variable architectural strategies boost invasive success of Lantana camara L. (sensu lato) in contrasting light environments. Biological Invasions, 2019; v.21: p.163-174. Available from: <Available from: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201900158796 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10530-018-1813-1.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1813-1.» https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201900158796
• GUNASEKARA, C. J., RANWALA, S. M. W. Growth responses of lantana (Lantana camara L.) varieties to varying water availability and light conditions. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka, 2018; v.46: p.69-79. Available from: <Available from: https://jnsfsl.sljol.info/articles/abstract/10.4038/jnsfsr.v46i1.8266/ >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.4038/jnsfsr.v46i1.8266.
  » https://doi.org/10.4038/jnsfsr.v46i1.8266.» https://jnsfsl.sljol.info/articles/abstract/10.4038/jnsfsr.v46i1.8266/
• GUNAWARDENA, K., STEEMERS, K. Living walls in indoor environments. Building and Environment, 2019; v.148: p.478-487. Available from: <Available from: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/290072 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.014.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.11.014.» https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/290072
• KALTSIDI, M. P. et al. Assessment of different LED lighting systems for indoor living walls. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020; v.272: 109522. Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423820303502 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109522.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109522.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304423820303502
• KAZEMI, F. et al. Investigating the plant and air-quality performances of an internal green wall system under hydroponic conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020; v.275: 111230. Available from: <Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32861001/ >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111230.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111230.» https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32861001/
• LENTH, R. et al. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.8.1-1, 2022. Available from: <Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023.
  » https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
• LINTON, H. Color in Architecture: Design Methods for Buildings, Interiors, and Urban Spaces. New York, 1999.
• LOHR, V. I. et al. Interior Plants May Improve Worker Productivity and Reduce Stress in a Windowless Environment. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 1996; v.14: p.97-100. Available from: <Available from: https://meridian.allenpress.com/jeh/article/14/2/97/79431/Interior-Plants-May-Improve-Worker-Productivity >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.24266/0738-2898-14.2.97.
  » https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-14.2.97.» https://meridian.allenpress.com/jeh/article/14/2/97/79431/Interior-Plants-May-Improve-Worker-Productivity
• MOYA, T. A. et al. A review of green systems within the indoor environment. Indoor and Built Environment, 2019; v.28: p.298-309. Available from: <Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1420326X18783042 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1177/1420326X18783042.
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X18783042.» https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1420326X18783042
• MUTHAHARA, E. et al. The Effect of Light Intensity and Paclobutrazol on Flowering of Lantana Plants (Lantana Camara L.). Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 2018; v.80: p.447-451. Available from: <Available from: https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183326647 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.18551/rjoas.2018-08.60.
  » https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2018-08.60.» https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20183326647
• NEGI, G. C. S. et al. Ecology and Use of Lantana camara in India. Botanical Review, 2019; v.85: p.109-130. Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12229-019-09209-8 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s12229-019-09209-8.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-019-09209-8.» https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12229-019-09209-8
• PASSOS, J. L. et al. Anatomia foliar das espécies Lantana camara e L. radula (Verbenaceae). Planta Daninha, 2009; v.27: p.689-700. Available from: <Available from: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S010083582009000400007&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582009000400007.
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582009000400007.» http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S010083582009000400007&script=sci_abstract&tlng=pt
• PÉREZ-URRESTARAZU, L. et al. Particularities of having plants at home during the confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2021; v.59: 126919. Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866720307366 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126919.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126919.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866720307366
• QIN, J. et al. The effect of indoor plants on human comfort. Indoor and Built Environment, 2014; v.23: p.709-723. Available from: <Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1420326X13481372 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1177/1420326X13481372.
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X13481372.» https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1420326X13481372
• RUEDEN, C. T. et al. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2017; v.18: p.1-26. Available from: <Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29187165/ >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z.
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z.» https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29187165/
• TAN, C. L.et al. Growth light provision for indoor greenery: A case study. Energy and Buildings, 2017; v.144: p.207-217. Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778817309519 >. Accessed: Jan. 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.044.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.044.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378778817309519
• VALLADARES, F., NIINEMETS, Ü. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 2008; v.39: p.237-257. Available from: <Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506 >. Accessed: Jan. 30, 2023. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506.
  » https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506.» https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173506

• CR-2022-0493.R1

Edited by

Editors: Alessandro Dal’Col Lúcio (0000-0003-0761-4200) Leandro Souza da Silva (0000-0002-1636-6643)

Edited by

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors contributed equally to the conception and writing of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  14 Apr 2023
• Date of issue
  2023

History

• Received
  03 Sept 2022
• Accepted
  09 Jan 2023
• Reviewed
  03 Feb 2023