SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 número5Fontes de ferro para o desenvolvimento de porta-enxertos críticos produzidos em substrato de casca de pinus e vermiculitaCrescimento, desenvolvimento e recuperação do 15N do fertilizante em cafeeiro índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Scientia Agricola

versão impressa ISSN 0103-9016

Sci. agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) v.64 n.5 Piracicaba set./out. 2007

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162007000500011 

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

 

Comparison of carbon and nitrogen determination methods for samples of a Paleudult subjected to no-till cropping systems

 

Comparação de métodos de determinação de carbono e nitrogênio em amostras de Argissolo sob plantio direto

 

 

Jeferson DieckowI,*; João MielniczukII; Heike KnickerIII; Cimélio BayerII; Deborah Pinheiro DickIV; Ingrid Kögel-KnabnerIII

IUFPR - Depto. de Solos e Engenharia Agrícola, R. dos Funcionários 1540 - 80035-050 - Curitiba, PR - Brasil
IIUFRGS - Depto. de Solos, C.P. 15100 - 91501-970 - Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil
IIITUM - Lehrstuhl für Bodenkunde, D-85350 - Freising-Weihenstephan - Germany
IVUFRGS - Depto. de Físico-Química, 90001-970 - Porto Alegre, RS - Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Organic carbon (C) concentration evaluated by the Walkley-Black method, and total nitrogen(N)concentration determined by Kjeldahl method, were compared with corresponding results of C and N concentrations obtained through the dry combustion method (Elementar Vario EL analyzer), using samples of ten soil layers down to the depth of 107.5 cm of a kaolinitic Typic Paleudult (220-418 g clay kg-1 along the profile) subjected to no-till cropping systems [fallow bare soil, pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) plus maize, and lablab (Lablab purpureum L. Sweet) plus maize]. A close correlation (R2 > 0.96) was observed between the C results of the Walkley-Black and dry combustion methods, but a correction was suggested to be applied to C results of Walkley-Black (C = 1.05CW.Black + 0.47). A close correlation (R2 > 0.96) was also found between results of Kjeldahl-N and dry combustion-N, but no correction was necessary to be applied. The relationships between results of Walkley-Black and dry combustion and between results of Kjeldahl and dry combustion did not change among soil samples from different management systems, in disagreement to findings of a previous study where results of analytical C recovery were influenced by samples from different managements, supposedly because changes in lability or recalcitrance of organic matter might have affected the wet combustion reactions. A poor correlation (R2 = 0.42) was found between the C:N ratios based on Walkley-Black and Kjeldahl analysis and the C:N ratios based on dry combustion analysis. The methods for C and N determination did not affect the interpretation of the effects of management systems on soil C and N stocks.

Key words: Walkley-Black, Kjeldahl, wet combustion, dry combustion


RESUMO

Resultados de concentração de carbono (C), obtidos pelo método Walkley-Black, e resultados de concentração de nitrogênio (N) total, determinados pelo método Kjeldahl, foram comparados com os correspondentes resultados de C e N obtidos pelo método de combustão seca (analisador Elementar Vario EL), utilizando-se amostras de dez camadas de um Argissolo Vermelho até a profundidade de 107.5 cm (220-418 g argila kg-1 ao longo do perifl), manejado em sistemas de culturas de plantio direto [solo descoberto, guandu (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) mais milho, e lab lab (Lablab purpureum L. Sweet) mais milho]. Alta correlação (R2 > 0.96) foi observada entre os resultados de C-Walkley-Black e C-combustão seca. Uma correção foi sugerida para os resultados de C-Walkley-Black (C = 1.05CW.Black + 0.47). Elevada correlação (R2 > 0.96) também foi observada entre os resultados de N-Kjeldahl e N-combustão seca, não sendo necessária a aplicação de uma correção aos resultados de N-Kjeldahl. A relação entre os resultados de Walkley-Black e combustão seca e entre os resultados de Kjeldahl e combustão seca não mudaram entre amostras de solo de diferentes sistemas de manejo, diferindo dos resultados de um trabalho anterior onde a recuperação analítica de C foi influenciada por amostras oriundas de diferentes manejos, supostamente por alterações na labilidade ou recalcitrância da matéria orgânica terem afetado as reações de combustão úmida. Uma baixa correlação (R2 = 0.42) foi observada entre a relação C:N baseada nas análises Walkley-Black e Kjeldahl e a relação C:N baseada na combustão seca. Os métodos de determinação de C e N não afetaram as interpretações do efeito de sistemas de manejo sobre os estoques de C e N no solo.

Palavras-chave: Walkley-Black, Kjeldahl, combustão úmida, combustão seca


 

 

INTRODUCTION

The reliability of methods for carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) measurements is of fundamental concern in soil organic matter studies because C and N analyses constitute the first analytical step towards soil organic matter quantification and characterization. Automated dry combustion methods, although being of easy and simple operation, not requiring excessive amounts of reagents, presenting high accuracy and not having the problem related to chemical waste disposal, are not always feasible for small laboratories due to acquisition costs of the equipment. Thus, in many soil laboratories the conventional Walkley-Black and Kjeldahl methods for C and N analysis, respectively, are still routinely being employed.

Although the C concentration results given by the Walkley-Black rapid dichromate oxidation method are generally lower than those obtained through the reference dry combustion methods (McGeehan & Naylor, 1988; Mikhailova et al., 2003) a high correlation is commonly found between these two methods (Mikhailova et al., 2003; Pérez et al., 2001). To overcome the problem of incomplete C recovery which leads to the underestimation of C concentrations by Walkley-Black method, the analytical results of this technique are corrected by a factor, commonly reported as 1.30 when no external heat is applied (Nelson & Sommers, 1996). A correction factor of 1.63 was proposed for a Russian Chernozem (Mikhailova et al., 2003), while a factor of 1.12 was suggested for subtropical soils of the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (Tedesco et al., 1995), but with application of external heat.

The Kjeldahl method of soil N analysis is being commonly employed in laboratories not equipped with a dry combustion automated analyzer, although more personal labor and reagents are required. In organic soils or soils with high organic matter contents, the results of N concentration obtained through the Kjeldahl method are generally lower than results of dry combustion (Bremner & Shaw, 1958; Stewart et al., 1963). For mineral soils or soils with low organic matter contents, results have been comparable between these two methods (Bremner & Shaw, 1958; Stewart et al., 1963).

Regarding the influence that soil samples originated from different management systems might have on analytical results of wet combustion or digestion, Diaz-Zorita (1999) showed that C recovery by Walkley-Black method was 15% lower compared to dry combustion method in samples of a pasture land in Argentina Pampa, while for agricultural land samples, results were comparable among the two methods. This difference among samples of distinct management systems was attributed to the greater amounts of chemical stable organic compounds in pasture than in crop residues. This influence of samples from different management on C results could not be however confirmed in a study conducted in a Russian Chernozem (Mikhailova et al., 2003).

The hypothesis of this study is that different analytical methods for soil C and N determinations (dry and wet combustion) provide different C and N concentration results, and thus corrections to a standard method should be necessary. Therefore, this study compares the results of soil organic C concentration and stock obtained by Walkley-Black method and the results of total N concentration and stock determined by Kjeldahl method with the respective C and N concentrations and stocks obtained through the automated dry combustion method (Elementar Vario EL analyzer), using samples of a subtropical kaolinitic Typic Paleudult subjected to different no-till cropping systems.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Soil samples

Soil samples were collected from a long-term experiment (18 years) located in Eldorado do Sul, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (30º51' S and 51º38' W). The soil was a kaolinitic Typic Paleudult, and the climate as humid-subtropical (Cfa, Köppen). Ten soil layers were sampled down to the 107.5-cm depth, in three replicates of three no-till cropping systems: bare soil; pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) plus maize (Zea mays L.) [P+M]; and lablab (Lablab purpureum L. Sweet) plus maize [L+M]. The P+M and L+M systems were conducted under two N levels (0 and 180 kg N ha-1 applied to the maize crops). Soil samples were air dried and ground in a mortar to pass through a 0.50-mm mesh sieve.

The clay fraction of the 0-20 cm layer is constituted mainly by kaolinite (720 g kg-1), but contains also iron oxides (109 g kg-1) and other unidentified minerals (Bayer, 1996). An increment in clay content from 221 g kg-1 in the top layer to 418 g kg-1 in the deepest layer was found, due to the presence of the argillic horizon (Table 1). Soil texture analyses were performed using the hydrometer with a Bouyoucos' scale, (Gee & Bauder, 1986). More details about the experiment and sampling are given elsewhere (Diekow et al., 2005).

 

 

Carbon analyses

The Walkley-Black procedure of C analysis was based on the description of Nelson & Sommers (1996), with adaptation to the employment of external heat (Tedesco et al., 1995). The heating was provided by swirling the suspension over a Bunsen burner-flame after the addition of H2SO4 and was controlled so that the initial temperature of 120ºC could rise to 150ºC within one minute. Soil samples of about 0.50 g were used, but for some treatments with high C concentration the analysis had to be repeated using 0.25 g.

Dry combustion method (975ºC) was performed with a Vario EL II analyzer (Elementar Analysensysteme, Hanau, Germany) detecting carbon as CO2. The detection limit for carbon is 0.4 μg. Soil samples of about 30 mg were used. Since no carbonate C is present in this Paleudult (Brasil, 1973), the total C is referred as the organic C. Total C stocks were calculated for the 0-27.5 cm layer, after considering the soil bulk density of each layer (Table 2). Soil density down to the 27.5 cm depth was determined as suggested by Bayer (1996), and in no-N treatments, according to the core method (Blake & Hartage, 1986). For N-fertilized treatments, considered the same bulk density of no-N treatments was considered.

 

 

Nitrogen analyses

The Kjeldahl semimicro procedure was based on acid digestion followed by steam distillation of the NH3 formed after addition of alkali (Bremner, 1965). The dry combustion was carried out simultaneously with the C analysis, in the same Vario EL analyzer, which has a detection limit of 1 mg for N. The total N stocks in the 0-27.5 cm layer were calculated according to the same procedure for total C.

Statistical analysis

Data were submitted to analysis of variance to assess the significance of the effects of cropping systems and N fertilization levels on the C and N concentrations and stocks measured through the different analytical methods. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out according to the employed split-plot design, considering the cropping system factor as the main plot and N level as sub-plots. The soil layer factor was not considered in ANOVA. Means were compared by using the Tukey test (P = 0.05), and linear regressions were made between results of Walkley-Black and dry combustion, and between Kjeldahl and dry combustion methods. The confidence intervals of the angular and linear coefficients of these regressions were calculated at P < 0.05, across the three experimental replicates.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Comparison of methods for C determination

The results of C concentration obtained through the Walkley-Black method correlated well (R2 > 0.96) with results of C concentration obtained through dry combustion technique, for soil samples of all cropping systems (Figures 1a, 1b and 1c). The regressions found between these two methods were practically the same in the three cropping systems (Figures 1a, 1b and 1c), showing that results of C recovery by the Walkley-Black method compared to the reference dry combustion method were not influenced by samples originated from different managements. The Walkley-Black C recovery was also not affected by land use and soil management systems for a Russian Chernozem (Mikhailova et al., 2003), but was for a Typic Hapludoll in Argentina Pampa, where the chemical stable compounds of organic matter occurring after the application of some managements has supposedly reduced the Walkley-Black C recovery (Diaz-Zorita, 1999).

Since the relationship between Walkley-Black and dry combustion remains the same across samples of different management systems, a general regression was fitted considering all the treatments together (Figure 1d). In most of the samples, C concentration determined through Walkley-Black method was lower than that obtained through dry combustion (Figure 1), possibly because of incomplete oxidation of the total organic C in the Walkley-Black procedure (McGeehan & Naylor, 1988; Nelson & Sommers, 1996). By taking the inverse of the linear regression in Figure 1d, a correction equation is thus proposed to be applied on the C concentration results of Walkley-Black: C = 1.05CW.Black + 0.47.

The C concentrations of the two top layers as determined through dry combustion were affected by cropping systems and N fertilization levels, so that higher concentrations were found for soils under P+M and L+M or N fertilized, compared to the bare soil or soils without N fertilization (Table 3). The same trend was observed for C concentrations as determined by the Walkley-Black procedure, except of a lack of significance for the difference between fertilized and non-fertilized treatments in the top layer of P+M and in the second layer of L+M systems (Table 3).

The statistical trends for results of C concentration between cropping systems and between N fertilization levels were comparable for the two methods (Table 3). This was also observed for results of C stocks in the 0-27.5 cm layer, the layer which nearly corresponds to the 0-30 cm depth used in soil C inventory surveys (IPCC, 1996) (Table 4). Therefore, the methods for soil C determinations did not affect the interpretation of the effects of management systems in this kaolinitic Paleudult. This differs from the findings of Diaz-Zorita (1999) and Brye & Slaton (2003), which showed influence of the analytical methodology (Walkley-Black and dry combustion) on the interpretations of their results in different land use systems and crop rotations.

 

 

Comparison of methods for N determination

Nitrogen concentrations obtained by dry combustion were highly correlated (R2 > 0.96) to those of the Kjeldahl method (Figure 2) and the regressions between them were very similar for the three cropping systems (Figures 2a, 2b and 2c). There was, however, a tendency of the results from Kjeldahl to become closer to those obtained by dry combustion, for the L+M system (Figure 2c).

Total N concentration by the Kjeldahl method tended to be lower than those obtained via dry combustion, considering the results of all systems together (Figure 2d), but this cannot be considered significant according to the confidence interval, which showed that the angular coefficient did not differ from 1 and the linear coefficient did not differ from zero (Figure 2d). Therefore, no correction was necessary for the Kjeldahl-N results. The tendency, however, for the higher concentrations obtained by dry combustion could be related to a non quantitatively release of some refractory N, or of N in N-O structures of NO3- (McGeehan & Naylor, 1988; Bremner, 1965).

Similar to C, the N concentrations in the two top layers as assessed by dry combustion were significantly higher for the P+M and L+M systems as compared to bare soil, and for fertilized soils than non fertilized treatments (Table 5). About the same statistical trend was observed for results of the Kjeldahl method, except for the top layer of P+M and the second layer of L+M, where no differences were observed between fertilized and non-fertilized treatments (Table 5). In a general view, the statistical trends observed for the results of N concentration are relatively similar, either for dry combustion or Kjeldahl (Table 5). Similar statistical trends of the two methods were also observed for the results of total N stocks in the 0-27.5 cm layer (Table 6). This means that the interpretations of the effect of soil management on the N concentrations and stocks, as well as the conclusions drawn from these interpretations, are comparable irrespective if analysis were performed through dry combustion or Kjeldahl method.

 

 

C:N ratios

One of the basic information in soil organic matter characterization studies is the C:N ratio. There was a poor correlation (R2 = 0.42) between the C:N ratios calculated from results of C and N obtained through dry combustion and those calculated from results of Walkley-Black and Kjeldahl methods (Figure 3a). The same trend was observed when the Walkley-Black-C concentrations were corrected by the respective correction equation (C = 1.05CW.Black + 0.47) (Figure 3b) or when the Walkley-Black-C concentration was multiplied by the correction factor of 1.12, as commonly performed for soils analysis in Rio Grande do Sul (Tedesco et al., 1995) (Figure 3c). This poor correlation for the C:N ratio as compared to the high correlations for C and N may be a result from the division operation to obtain C:N values, which possibly amplifies the distortions between the two methods.

There was a tendency for the C:N ratio calculated from non-corrected Walkley-Black-C and Kjeldahl-N to underestimate the ratio calculated from dry combustion, above the value of 9.5 (Figure 3a). On the other hand, the C:N ratio calculated from the corrected Walkley-Black-C (C = 1.05CW.Black + 0.47) and Kjeldahl-N overestimated the C:N ratio from dry combustion, for values below 14.0, which are the common C:N ratios for soils. These results are indications that the absolute C:N ratio values should be interpreted with caution, since under- or overestimations can occur in relation to the real value according to the employed methodological procedure. But in spite of this, there is a clear tendency for samples with high C:N ratios analyzed according to wet methods, also show high C:N ratios analyzed according to dry combustion, and vice versa.

 

CONCLUSIONS

The C concentration determined by Walkley-Black and the N concentration determined by Kjeldahl methods obtained for this kaolinitic Paleudult profile highly correlate to the respective results of C and N concentrations determined through the automated dry combustion method (Elementar Vario EL), and, the correction equation (C = 1.05CW.Black + 0.47) is suggested to be applied on results of C obtained by Walkley-Black. The results of N obtained by Kjeldahl methods did not need correction.

The methods for C and N determination did not affect the interpretation of the effects of management systems on soil C and N stocks, indicating that both methodological approaches provide comparable conclusions in soil organic matter studies in different management systems.

The C:N ratio results obtained after Walkley-Black and Kjeldahl methods have a poor correlation to results obtained after dry combustion technique. Possibly the deviations between results of Walkley-Black C and dry combustion C and the deviations between results of Kjeldahl N and dry combustion N were magnified after the calculation of C:N ratios.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To J. A. Zanatta, for her collaboration on statistical analysis and to CNPq for providing scholarships to J. Mielniczuk, C. Bayer and D.P. Dick. CAPES and DAAD are acknowledged for supporting the Probral project, in the framework of which this study was carried out. To FAPERGS, for financial support in the framework of the project PRONEX.

 

REFERENCES

BAYER, C. Dynamics of soil organic matter in management systems. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 1996. 241p. (Thesis Ph.D.).         [ Links ]

BLAKE, G.R.; HARTAGE, K.H. Bulk density. In: KLUTE, A. (Ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison: SSSA, 1986. p.363-375.         [ Links ]

BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura. Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do Rio Grande do Sul. Recife: Convênio MA/DPP – SA/DRNR, 1973. 431p.         [ Links ]

BREMNER, J.M. Organic forms of nitrogen. In: BLACK, C.A. (Ed.). Methods of soils analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison: SSSA, 1965. p.1238-1255.         [ Links ]

BREMNER, J.M.; SHAW, K. Denitrification in soil. I. Methods of investigation. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.51, p.2239, 1958.         [ Links ]

BRYE, K.R.; SLATON, N.A. Carbon and nitrogen storage in a Typic Albaqualf as affected by assessment method. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v.34, p.1637-1655, 2003.         [ Links ]

DIAZ-ZORITA, M. Soil organic carbon recovery by the Walkley-Black method in a Typical Hapludoll. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v.30, p.739-745, 1999.         [ Links ]

DIEKOW, J.; MIELNICZUK, J.; KNICKER, H.; BAYER, C.; DICK, D.P.; KÖGEL-KNABNER, I. Soil C and N stocks as affected by cropping systems and nitrogen fertilization in a southern Brazil Acrisol managed under no-tillage for 17 years. Soil and Tillage Research, v.81, p.87-95, 2005.         [ Links ]

GEE, G.W.; BAUDER, J.W. Particle-size analysis. In: KLUTE, A. (Ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison: SSSA, 1986. p.383-411.         [ Links ]

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE IPCC. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: The workbook. Geneva: IPCC, 1996.         [ Links ]

McGEEHAN, S.L.; NAYLOR, D.V. Automated instrumental analysis of carbon and nitrogen in plant and soil samples. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v.19, p.493-505, 1988.         [ Links ]

MIKHAILOVA, E.A.; NOBLE, R.R.P.; POST, C.J. Comparison of soil organic carbon recovery by Walkley-Black and dry combustion methods in the Russian Chernozem. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v.34, p.1853-1860, 2003.         [ Links ]

NELSON, P.W.; SOMMERS, C. E. Total C, organic C and organic matter. In: PAGE, A.L. (Ed.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical methods. Madison: SSSA, 1996. p.539-579.        [ Links ]

PÉREZ, D.V.; ALCANTARA, S.; ARRUDA, R.J.; MENEGHELLI, N.A. Comparing two methods for soil carbon and nitrogen determination using selected Brazilian soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v.32, p.295-309, 2001.         [ Links ]

STEWART, B.A.; PORTER, L.K.; CLARK, F.E. The reliability of a micro-dumas procedure for determining total nitrogen in soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, v.27, p.377380, 1963.         [ Links ]

TEDESCO, M.J.; GIANELLO, C.; BISSANI, C.A.; BOHNEN, H.; VOLKWEISS, S.J. Análise de solo, plantas e outros materiais. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, 1995. 174p.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received November 30, 2005
Accepted June 22, 2007

 

 

*Corresponding author <jefersondieckow@ufpr.br>