N-alkanes to estimate voluntary forage intake of cattle using controlled-release capsules

N-alcanos para estimar o consumo voluntário de forragem em bovinos usando cápsulas de liberação controlada

ANIMAL SCIENCE AND PASTURES

N-alkanes to estimate voluntary forage intake of cattle using controlled-release capsules

N-alcanos para estimar o consumo voluntário de forragem em bovinos usando cápsulas de liberação controlada

Dimas Estrasulas de Oliveira^I*; Marcelo de Queiroz Manella^II; Luis Orlindo Tedeschi^III; Sila Carneiro da Silva^IV; Dante Pazzanese Duarte Lanna^IV

^IUDESC - Centro de Educação Superior do Oeste, R. Benjamin Constant, 164-D - 89801-070 - Chapecó, SC - Brasil

^IIAlltech do Brasil, Said Mohamed El Khatib, CIC - 81170-610 - Curitiba, PR - Brasil

^IIITexas A&M University, 230 Kleberg Center, 2471 - TAMU, College Station - 77843-2471 - TX, USA

^IVUSP/ESALQ - Depto. de Zootecnia, C.P. 09 - 13418-900 - Piracicaba, SP - Brasil

ABSTRACT

N-alkanes have been used as internal markers in digestibility trials with ruminants and non-ruminants for more than 20 years. In this study, two trials were conducted under different feeding regimes to (i) evaluate the release rate of n-alkanes of controlled-release capsules in the rumen of rumen-cannulated steers either grazing or restrained in metabolic stalls and (ii) estimate voluntary forage intake of the same steers in metabolic stalls. Six rumen-cannulated Nelore steers were allocated to individual metabolic stalls and were fed diets with varying forage to concentrate ratios (80:20, 60:40, and 40:60; respectively). Corn silage was the only forage source. In the grazing trial, the same steers were evaluated under three feeding managements (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu unsupplemented or supplemented with either 0.3% or 0.6% of live weight of a concentrate). The release rate of the n-alkanes (mg d^-1) was measured by multiplying the distance (mm d^-1) the capsule plunger travelled after 3, 7, 10, 13, and 17 d of rumen infusion to the n-alkanes concentration of capsule tablets (mg mm^-1). There was an effect of day of measurement (P < 0.05) on the release rate of animals restrained in metabolic stalls and grazing. However, no effect (P > 0.05) of feeding management or feeding management x day of measurement interaction was observed. Values averaged 6.9 and 14.8%, lower than proposed by the manufacturer for the C₃₂, when animals were restrained in metabolic stalls and at grazing, respectively. Similarly, the values of C₃₆ were 15.9 and 23.1% lower for those animals in metabolic stalls and grazing, respectively. The average release rate of C₃₂ into the rumen was 372 and 341 mg d^-1 for animals restrained in metabolic stalls and grazing, respectively. There was no difference in the release rate between feeding regimes (P > 0.05). The regression of the pooled data indicated an average release rate of 345 mg d^-1. Estimated values of voluntary forage intake using the pair of C₃₃:C₃₂ n-alkanes using the animals restrained in metabolic stalls was not different from those effectively measured (P > 0.05). These findings indicated that n-alkanes capsules can be used to estimate forage intake of stall-fed animals, but concentration of n-alkanes in capsules and the release rate has to be measured before dosing animals to accurately predict intake.

Key words: bovine, fecal recovery, hydrocarbons, markers, dry matter intake

RESUMO

N-alcanos têm sido usados como marcadores internos em ensaios de digestibilidade com ruminantes e não-ruminantes por mais de 20 anos. Neste estudo dois ensaios foram conduzidos para avaliar: 1) a taxa de liberação de alcanos de cápsulas de liberação controlada inseridas no rúmen de novilhos fistulados em pastejo ou mantidos em gaiolas de metabolismo e; 2) o uso de n-alcanos para estimar o consumo voluntário de forragem dos novilhos mantidos em gaiolas de metabolismo. Seis novilhos Nelore, fistulados no rúmen foram colocados individualmente em gaiolas de metabolismo e alimentados com dietas variando a relação forragem:concentrado (80:20, 60:40 e 40:60, respectivamente). A silagem de milho foi a única fonte de forragem. No ensaio de pastejo, os animais foram avaliados sob três regimes de alimentação (Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu sem ou com suplementação com concentrado na proporção de 0,3 ou 0,6% do peso vivo, PV). A taxa de liberação de n-alcanos (mg d^-1) foi medida multiplicando-se a distância percorrida pelo êmbolo da cápsula (mm d^-1) após 3, 7, 10, 13 e 17 dias de inserção no rúmen, pela concentração de alcanos dos tabletes das cápsulas (mg mm^-1). Houve um efeito de dia (P < 0,05) sobre a taxa de liberação para os animais em gaiolas de metabolismo e em pastejo. Contudo, não houve efeito (P > 0,05) do regime de alimentação ou da interação regime da alimentação x dia da medida. Os valores foram 6,9 e 14,8% menores do que o proposto pelo fabricante para o C₃₂ quando os animais foram mantidos em gaiolas de metabolismo e pastejo, respectivamente. Os valores para o C₃₆ foram 15,9 e 23,1% menores para os animais em gaiolas de metabolismo e pastejo, respectivamente. A liberação média do C₃₂ dentro do rúmen foi 372 e 341 mg d^-1 para os animais em gaiolas de metabolismo e pastejo, respectivamente. Não houve diferença na taxa de liberação entre os animais em gaiolas de metabolismo e em pastejo e a regressão linear usando os dois conjuntos de dados resultou em uma taxa de liberação de 345 mg dia^-1 do C₃₂. Os consumos estimados de forragem usando o par C₃₃:C₃₂ de alcanos não diferiu dos consumos observados para os animais em gaiolas de metabolismo. Estes resultados indicam que as cápsulas de liberação controlada podem ser utilizadas para estimar o consumo de forragem em animais estabulados mas a taxa de liberação e a concentração de alcanos nas cápsulas devem ser medidas para gerar predições mais exatas.

Palavras-chave: bovinos, recuperação fecal, hidrocarbonetos, marcadores, consumo de matéria seca

INTRODUCTION

N-alkanes are saturated, aliphatic hydrocarbons with length varying from 21 to 37 carbon atoms. They are part of the cuticular wax of plant leaves and usually are part of the ether extract. The oral administration of n-alkanes has been used in digestibility trials with domestic and wild ruminants as well as monogastrics animals to measure feed digestibility (Mayes et al., 1984; Oliveira et al., 2000), feed intake (Mayes et al., 1986; Dove et al., 1989; Oliveira et al., 2007), and composition of the available herbage or diet (Dove, 1992; Dove & Mayes, 1991; Mayes & Dove, 2000; Dove & Moore, 1995).

N-alkanes can be supplied to animals in different forms. Mayes et al. (1986) fed pellets made of paper strip embedded with synthetic n-alkanes as external markers to estimate feed intake of sheep. Similarly, Dove et al. (1989) fed sheep with n-alkanes (C₂₈ and C₃₂) in the form of gelatin capsules of powder cellulose, previously added with a known amount of n-alkane dissolved with n-hexane or n-heptane, to estimate forage intake. Vulich et al. (1991) developed a different method that consisted of mixing n-alkanes with solvents and powder cellulose, resulting in a homogenous suspension that, after being evaporated and dried, was inserted into gelatin capsules. Marais et al. (1996) developed another technique in which particles of Pennisetum clandestinum (Hochst.) were impregnated with n-alkanes suspended in a xanthan gum (0.4%) and infused into the rumen of sheep using either dose guns or disposable syringes.

In general, estimates of intake are based on the fecal ratio of odd chain n-alkane, a natural component of feeds, to homologous form of even chain (Mayes et al, 1986). Unfortunately, these techniques require daily infusions, which may cause stress and affect normal eating behavior of animals. Additionally, the discrete infusion of markers may lead to variations on diurnal excretions resulting in erroneous estimates of intake. The use of controlled-release devices of n-alkanes may minimize the measurement errors associated with diurnal and/or daily variations on fecal concentration of markers.

Therefore, the objectives of this study were to measure the release rate of synthetic n-alkanes from controlled-release capsules (MCM Alkanes code 60421 - Captec, NZ), and to evaluate the estimated forage intake of Nelore steers restrained in metabolic stalls.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Trial 1

Experimental procedures

A trial was conducted with six rumen-cannulated Nelore steers (18 months old and average 380 kg of body live weight; LW) in metabolic stalls in Nova Odessa, SP, Brazil (22º7' S; 48º0' W; and altitude of 528 m). Two animals were randomly assigned to one of three diets that were formulated to meet energy and protein requirements in a maintenance level according to the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) model (Fox et al., 2004). Humane animal care and handling procedures were followed.

The dietary ingredients and chemical composition of each diet are presented in Table 1. Pelleted soybean hulls and corn silage were mixed with concentrate immediately before feeding. The daily dry matter intake (DMI) was adjusted to be equivalent to 100 g of DM kg^-0.75 of shrunk LW. The three diets were formulated to contain 80:20, 60:40, and 40:60 of forage to concentrate ratio on a dry matter (DM) basis.

After a week of adaptation, animals were dosed with one n-alkane controlled-release capsule via the rumen cannula with n-dotriacontane (C₃₂) and n-hexatriacontane (C₃₆) (MCM Alkanes - Captec, NZ). The capsule was made of a 16 cm long and 3.8 cm diameter plastic cylinder, and it was closed at one end with a wire spring attached to a plunger. The plunger applied pressure on five tablets containing the n-alkanes in their matrix. Once in the rumen, tablets were maintained in close contact with the rumen liquor at the open end of the plastic cylinder. Capsules were equipped with a transversal wing (18 cm length) located at the closed end of the plastic cylinder to avoid regurgitation. A long string was attached to the wing and to the ruminal cannula to provide easy recovery of capsules. The string allowed capsules to move freely in the rumen.

On days 3, 7, 10, 13 and 17 after dosing, capsules were removed and quickly washed with sprinkled warm water. The distance traveled by the plunger was measured with a caliper and capsules were then re-inserted into the rumen. Measurements were taken on four diametrically opposite points alongside the cylinder. Two capsules of the same batch were opened to measure the thickness and weight of the tablets. N-alkanes concentration was determined on two tablets and daily DMI measurements and fecal collections were performed during five consecutive days from day 8 after the administration of the capsules.

N-alkanes extraction

Samples of corn silage, concentrates, and feces were dried in a forced-draught oven at 60ºC for 48 h and then finely ground to pass a 1-mm sieve. Extraction and determination of n-alkanes in samples were made in duplicates as described by Oliveira (2004).

Gas chromatography analysis

Alkanes determinations were made using a capillary column CP-Sil 8CB (Crompack) with 30 m x 0.25 mm x 0.1 mm film thickness in a gas chromatography (ThermoQuest-Finnigam - USA) fitted with a flame ionization detector (FID). The injector temperature was 280ºC and the detector's 310ºC. Column temperature was programmed to start at 200ºC raising 6ºC min^-1 and to stop at 300ºC for 15 min. The carrier gas was Helium with a linear speed of 32 cm s^-1, and flame gases were N, H and O₂ at rates of 30, 35 and 430 mL min^-1, respectively. The injection mode was "split" with a ratio of 20:1 and 2 mL of a sample was automatically injected.

The area of each n-alkane chromatographic peak was calculated using ChromQuest version 2.53 (Thermo Electron Corporation). The identification of each n-alkane was made via correlation and linear regression analyses between the number of carbons in each chain and the logarithm of the retention time. The areas of each peak under the curve were converted into quantities of n-alkanes based on internal standard reference (n-tetratriacontane) according to McNair & Bonnelli (1968). The calculation of the response factors of each n-alkane was made as suggested by Untz & Tranchant (1982). The concentration of each n-alkane (kg kg^-1 of DM) of feed, feces, and tablets were calculated. The two tablets that were extracted for calibration purposes had an average of 1.54 g (SD = 63 mg) of C₃₂ and 1.39 g (SD = 11.9 mg) of C₃₆.

Calculations

The average thickness of alkane tablets was 10.3 mm (SD = 0.06) with an average of 149.5 and 135 mg mm^-1 of C₃₂ and C₃₆, respectively. Controlled release capsules had a mean length (distance from the closed end to the plunger) of 86.85 mm (SD = 0.05) (ID). The partial mean distance traveled (DP_3-17) was calculated as the difference between the initial capsule length (ID) and the distance traveled by the plunger at every measurement day (DISTA). These values were then divided by the number of days for each measurement event (3, 7, 10, 13 and 17 days after dosing).

The final values of fecal recovery (FRn) of n-alkanes (n) C₃₁, C₃₂, C₃₃, C₃₅ e C₃₆ were calculated based on actual intake (Int), fecal dry matter output (FP, kg), and n-alkane concentrations (mg kg^-1 of DM) in the diets (Di) and feces (Fe) according to Equation 1.

The FDMI was estimated using the pair C₃₃ (odd chained, natural in the diet) and C₃₂ (synthetic, even chained, from the controlled release capsule) according to Mayes et al. (1986), as shown in Equation 2.

where: FDMI = forage dry matter intake (kg of DM d^-1); D_e = even chain n-alkane dosed daily (mg d^-1); C_c = concentrate intake (kg of DM d^-1); C_e = even chain n-alkane naturally occurring in concentrate (mg kg^-1 of DM); C_o = odd chain n-alkane naturally occurring in concentrate (mg kg^-1 of DM); Fo_o = odd chain n-alkane naturally occurring in forage (mg kg^-1 of DM); F_o = odd chain n-alkane fecal concentration (mg kg^-1 of DM); F_e = even chain n-alkane fecal concentration (mg kg^-1 of DM); Fo_e = even chain n-alkane naturally occurring in forage (mg kg^-1 of DM).

Trial 2

Experimental procedures

Six rumen-fistulated Nelore steers (four of the six ones used in trial 1), averaging 470 kg of LW (SD = 36.8 kg) and 24 months of age, were used to evaluate the release rates of the same n-alkanes used in trial 1, but under grazing conditions. Two animals per treatment were allocated to three 1-ha paddocks of B. brizantha cv. Marandu along with other non-fistulated animals to maintain the herbage allowance. Experimental treatments investigated were: (i) only grazing with no concentrate supplementation or supplemented with either (ii) 0.3 % or (iii) 0.6 % of LW of a concentrate supplement. The composition of the supplements used is presented in Table 2. Supplements were prepared in order to feed the same amount of kg of protein kg^-1 of LW to the non-fistulated animals that were weighing 350 kg. Procedures related to dosing of controlled release capsules and n-alkanes determinations were similar to those described for Trial 1.

Statistical analysis

The effect of trials (metabolic stalls or grazing) on daily distance traveled by the capsule plunger and the release rates of n-alkanes were tested with the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (2000). Diet and its interactions with evaluation days as well as the effect of days after dosing on capsule release rate were analyzed. Release rate of n-alkanes was estimated as the slope of the linear regression between the distance traveled of the capsule plunger (DISTA) and days after dosing using the procedure PROC REG of SAS (2000). Data points outside of the range -2 to 2 of the studentized residue were considered outliers and removed from the database.

To verify if equations generated from the metabolic stall and grazing trial data could be pooled, intercept and slope values were compared according to the method described by Neter & Wasserman (1996) using a 95% confidence interval. Additionally, the comparison of feed intake estimates using n-alkanes and the actual measured values was made by fitting a linear regression between those two variables using PROC REG of SAS (2000). The mean bias associated with the technique was tested using Student-t test for paired values.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

N-alkanes release rate of steers fed under metabolic stall or grazing conditions

The data of daily distance traveled by the capsule plunger and the computed release rate of n-alkanes (Tables 3 and 4, respectively) were analyzed individually within trials. Data were collected up to 17 days after inclusion of the capsules into the rumen for both trials because adequate measurements of tablets thickness were not possible thereafter. Measurements of fecal concentrations taken before day 13 were used to estimate intake (7 days for rumen stabilization after capsule dosing and 5 consecutive days of fecal collections).

Data of one animal in trial 1 between day 10 and 13 were considered outliers and removed from the regression analysis. There was no diet effect or diet x day of measurement interaction (P > 0.05) on either the distance traveled by the plunger or the daily release rate of n-alkanes. Under grazing conditions, there was no effect of diet or diet x day of measurement interaction (P > 0.05) on the distance traveled by the plunger. N-alkanes release rates were not affected either by diet or diet x day of measurement interaction (P > 0.05).

Trial 1 (metabolic stalls) The linear regression presented in Equation 3 was highly significant (P < 0.0001) with an r² = 0.99 and MSE of 0.85. The coefficient of variation (4.2%) was similar to that reported by Dove et al. (2002) with sheep.

where DISTA is the distance traveled by the plunger, mm.

The product of the regression coefficient (2.49 mm d^-1) by the marker concentration (mg mm^-1) indicated a mean release rate of 372 mg d^-1 of C₃₂ and 336 mg day^-1 of C₃₆. These values were 7 and 16% lower than those proposed by the manufacturer (400 mg d^-1). This is in agreement with Ferreira et al. (2004), who reported values that were 14% less than the manufacturer's release rate for the same n-alkanes. The feed intake simulation with the labeled release rate of C₃₂ provided by the manufacturer indicated values 9.2% (± 1.5%) lower than those determined using the actual release rate values. Ferreira et al. (2004) also reported a difference of 12.2% for feed intake estimated using the manufacturer's release rate or the calculated release rate with C₃₂ as an external marker supplied by the same type of capsule.

Trial 2 (grazing condition): The linear regression represented by Equation 4 was highly significant (P < 0.0001) with a r² of 0.99, MSE of 0.53, and a coefficient of variation of 2.7%, indicating that days after dosage explained almost all variations in the n-alkane release rate. The quantities released were 341 and 308 mg day^-1 for C₃₂ and C_36, respectively.

where DISTA is the distance traveled by the plunger, mm.

The coefficient of variation in metabolic stalls (trial 1) was higher than that observed in the grazing trial. That could be explained by a constant feed intake in grazing conditions, even with the supplemented animals, since animals in the metabolic stall trial were fed twice daily. Other possible explanations are the physical structure, rumen motility, rumen volume, and dilution rate of liquid and solid fractions.

Since coefficients in equations for trial 1 and 2 were not different (P > 0.05), data were pooled in one single data set. The combined equation for trials 1 and 2 (DISTA = 0.76 + 2.31 x DAY; r² = 0.99, CV= 3.7%, and MSE = 0.69, P < 0.0001) estimated a release rate of 345 and 312 mg day^-1 of C₃₂ and C₃₆, respectively.

The estimate end point of capsules (release rate equals zero) was 20 and 22 days for the metabolic stall and grazing trials, respectively. These values are within the useful period of 17 to 23 days suggested by the manufacturer.

The results indicated no difference among diets (grazing and metabolic trials) on the capsule release rate. The daily release of marker was constant after dosing, indicating that n-alkanes could be used with diets of varying ratios of forage to concentrate.

Under grazing conditions, the diet chemical composition may vary due to selective grazing (leaves vs stem, live vs dead material, or immature vs mature plant tissues). This chemical modification can alter the dynamics of rumen fermentation (e.g. degradation and passage rates). Because natural n-alkanes are more associated with the solid phase and synthetic n-alkanes with the liquid phase (Mayes et al., 1988), these factors could interfere with forage intake predictions. Additionally, the physical structure of the diet could vary according to the herbage allowance and selective grazing by individual animals, which could result in changes in the leaf:stem ratio of the ingested herbage, affecting the predictions of forage intake. However, in the present study, the coefficient of variation and the error of the regression were low (2.7% and 0.53 mm, respectively), suggesting that these factors were not a problem. The range of diet types used in this experiment is similar to those used in practical conditions for both feedlot and grazing production systems, with or without supplementation, indicating that n-alkanes could be successfully used under field conditions.

Similar to our findings, Ferreira et al. (2004) reported a constant release rate of n-alkane capsules used to predict forage intake in two breeds of cattle. They determined a concentration of 141.7 mg of C₃₂ mm^-1, which is only 5.5% less than value estimated in this experiment (149.5 mg of C₃₂ mm^-1).

Dove et al. (2002) compared a controlled-release device (CRD) of C₂₈ and C₃₂ with daily administrations of paper pellets impregnated with C₃₆ in sheep and reported that CRD had better stability of release rates than the impregnated paper pellets. They also found no evidence of a curvilinear pattern of alkanes release rates using a CRD over time, which is in agreement with the findings of our experiment.

Genro (1999) determined the n-alkane release rate using fecal concentrations during days 7 and 15 after the administration of capsules (YC, Captec - NZ) into the rumen of rumen-cannulated steers fed Brachiaria hay (Brachiaria sp.) plus concentrate (0.5%BW) in metabolic stalls. The author reported a variation of the release rate of both n-alkanes (C₃₂ and C₃₆). Furthermore, fecal concentration of alkanes decreased from day 12 to 14 after administration of the capsules. However, Genro (1999) did not mention the natural occurrence of C₃₂ and/or C₃₆ in the hay, which could have influenced the alkane profile of the fecal samples.

Some factors could have influenced the release rate of n-alkanes in this study, such as: (i) the tension of the wire spring in the capsules, since it can be very difficult to maintain the initial tension as the solubilization of the tablets proceeds, (ii) the tablet material which is impregnated with markers, and (iii) interactions that may occur in the ruminal environment like pH and volatile fatty acid (VFA) production and concentration.

Prediction of dry matter intake

N-alkanes with chain length from 22 to 36 atoms of carbon were identified in the corn silage and in all three concentrates offered to animals. The most abundant alkanes in the corn silage were in a descending order: C₃₁, C₂₉, C₂₇ and C₃₃. This is in agreement with the information that odd chained alkanes are predominant in forage samples (Dove & Mayes, 1991; Oliveira et al., 2000). The N-alkanes concentration in concentrate feeds where lower than that in corn silage, and the most abundant were C₂₇, C₂₉ and C₃₁ (C₂₇ and C₂₉ are not shown). The n-alkanes with chain length of C₃₁ to C₃₆ carbons are shown in Table 5, except C₃₄ that was used as an internal standard.

A linear relation was observed (P < 0.05) between estimated (mean of 5.0 kg of DM d^-1, CV= 28.0%) and observed (mean of 4.9 kg of DM d^-1, CV= 28.5%) values of intake. The coefficient of determination (r²) was 66% and the coefficient of variation was 18.7%, resulting in the following equation: ObsIntake = 0.86 + 0.81 x EstIntC₃₃:C₃₂. The fecal concentrations of C₃₃ in two animals were 64 and 22% higher than the mean excretion by the other animals (38.3 ± 2.2%). Figure 1 depicts the relationship of these measurements. A paired t-test was performed on the estimated and observed intake values to evaluate the suitability and overall trend of the technique. The mean difference (0.1 kg) was not significant (P > 0.05).

The slope of the regression was not different from unity (P > 0.05), indicating a high reliability of the technique. This suggests that variations in the estimated values of intake were the same as those in the observed values, but the number of animals may be a limiting factor in this analysis. Future work should consider using animals to repeat measurements over longer periods of time.

Fluctuations in the absolute values of the fecal concentrations of markers may occur as a consequence of differences in intake and digestion of the diet. This last one is the best option for our case, because C₃₃ naturally occurs in the diets and the concentrations of C₃₂ were more homogeneous than the C₃₃ (means = 153 mg ± 3.3 vs. 44 mg ± 10.0, respectively). The affinity of synthetic C₃₂ n-alkane with the liquid phase of the rumen and the association of the dietary C₃₃ n-alkane with the solid phase could also contribute to these differences (Mayes et al., 1988). In our experiment corn silage and several concentrate feeds were used. This may have resulted in different passage rates of digesta, altering the kinetic relation of the marker released by the capsule and that from the feed, which in turn could have resulted in poor estimates of intake. Although the mean intake estimates were good, these limitations have to be taken into account when predicting DMI of grazing animals. There is also a possibility of an analytical bias, especially because of the low concentration of n-alkanes in the diets, including C₃₃ that was used as an internal marker in the calculations (Laredo et al., 1991; Dove & Mayes, 1991). Other important consideration that might have influenced feed intake estimates are the fecal recovery (Table 5).

The n-alkane technique works with the underlying assumption that similar fecal recoveries of homologous n-alkanes used as internal (odd chain from dietary sources) and external (dosed even chain) markers are achieved. There was a high discrepancy in the fecal recovery of both markers used in the calculations for three animals, likely causing the differences between estimated and observed intake values.

There were some values of fecal recovery higher than 100%. These values probably occurred because of the low concentrations of natural n-alkanes, as C₃₅, increasing the analytical error or even by an incomplete extraction of alkanes in feed samples. There are some reports of fecal recoveries higher than 100% (Berry et al., 2000, with C₃₂ = 117%, C₃₃ = 105% and C₃₆ = 118%; Gedir & Hudson, 2000, with C₃₆ = 113%; O'Keefe & McMeniman, 1998, with C₃₅ = 177%). O'Keefe & McMeniman (1998) suggested that the low concentrations of n-alkanes in the diet may lead to anomalous and inaccurate fecal recoveries. The daily variations of intake and fecal production may also contribute to misinterpretation. When feces are grouped, so are the "errors" associated with such variations. Therefore, it may be noticed that for one animal, for example, fecal recovery was over 100% for the pair C₃₃ and C₃₂ used in the estimates of intake. However, they were practically the same (C₃₂ = 114 and C₃₃ = 116%), indicating that even with values of recovery over 100%, the bias was common and similar to both alkanes used as markers, a key feature to estimates of intake using alkanes. In other animals there was no much difference, and the mean fecal recovery was 100 and 95% for C₃₂ and C₃₃, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

N-alkanes can be used to provide reliable estimates of herbage intake by animals fed diets with variable ratios of forage to concentrate feeds. Release rate values were constant, particularly during the first 13 days after dosing, an important feature in estimating intake. However, actual release rates and n-alkanes tablets concentration have to be checked because values provided by the manufacturer may be different. This indicates the need for a pre-experiment or an additional trial to test the release rate of capsules.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP). The first author is grateful to Dr. Hugh Dove, CSIRO, Australia, for his advices on the n-alkanes technique.

Received September 09, 2006

Accepted November 14, 2007

• BERRY, N.R.; SCHEEDER, M.R.L.; SUTTER, F.; KRÖBER, T.F.; KREUZER, M. The accuracy of intake estimation based on the use of alkane controlled-release capsules and faeces grab sampling in cows. Annales of Zootechnie, v.49, p.3-13, 2000.
• DOVE, H. Using the n-alkanes of plant cuticular wax to estimate the species composition of herbage mixtures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, v.43, p.1711-1724, 1992.
• DOVE, H.; MAYES, R.W. The use of plant wax alkanes as marker substances in studies of the nutrition of herbivores: a review. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, v.42, p.913-952, 1991.
• DOVE, H.; MOORE, A.D. Using a least-squares optimization procedure to estimate botanical composition based on the alkanes of plant cuticular wax. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, v.46, p.1535-1544, 1995.
• DOVE, H.; MAYES, R.W.; LAMB, C.S.; ELLIS, K.J. Factors influencing the release rate of alkanes from an intra-ruminal, controlled-release device, and the resultant accuracy of intake estimation in sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, v.53, p.681-696, 2002.
• DOVE, H.; MAYES, R.W.; FREER, M.; COOMBE, J.B.; FOOT, J.Z. Faecal recoveries of n-alkanes of plant cuticular waxes in penned and grazing sheep. In: INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS, 16., Nice, 1989. Proceedings Nice: The French Grassland Society, 1989. p.1093-1094.
• FERREIRA, L.M.M; OLIVÁN, M.; RODRIGUES, M.A.M.; OSORO, K; DOVE, H.; DIAS-DA-SILVA, A. Estimation of feed intake by cattle using controlled-release capsules containing n-alkanes or chromium sesquioxide. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.142, p.225-234, 2004.
• FOX, D.G.; TEDESCHI, L.O.; TYLUTKI, T.P.; RUSSELL, J.B.; AMBURGH, M.E. van; CHASE, L.E.; PELL, A.N.; OVERTON, T.R. The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology, v.112, p.29-78, 2004.
• GEDIR, J.V.; HUDSON, R.J. Estimating dry matter digestibility and intake in wapiti (Cervus elaphus canadensis) using the double n-alkane ratio technique. Small Ruminant Research, v.36, p.57-62, 2000.
• GENRO, T.C.M. Estimativas de consumo em pastejo e suas relações com os parâmetros da pastagem em gramíneas tropicais. Porto Alegre: UGRGS, 1999. 130p. Tese (Doutorado).
• LAREDO, M.A.; SIMPSON, G.D.; MINSON, D.J.; ORPIN, C.G. The potential for using n-alkanes in tropical forages as a marker for determination of dry matter by grazing ruminants. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.117, p.355-361, 1991.
• MARAIS, J.P.; FIGENSCHOU, P.L.; ESCOTT-WATSON, P.L.; WEBBER, L.N. Administration in suspension-form of n-alkane external markers for dry matter intake and diet selection studies. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.126, p.207-210, 1996.
• MAYES, R.W.; DOVE, H. Measurement of dietary nutrient intake in free-ranging mammalian herbivores. Nutrition Research Reviews, v.13, p.107-138, 2000.
• MAYES, R.W.; LAMB, C.S. The possible use of n-alkanes in herbage as indigestible faecal markers. Proceedings of the British Nutrition Society, v.43, p.39, 1984.
• MAYES, R.W.; LAMB, C.S.; COLGROVE, P.M. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.107, p.161-170, 1986.
• MAYES, R.W.; LAMB, C.S.; COLGROVE, P.M. Digestion and metabolism of dosed even-chain and odd-chain n-alkanes in sheep. In: GENERAL MEETING EUROPEAN GRASSLAND FEDERATION, 12., Dublin, 1988. Proceedings Dublin: BSAS, 1988. p.159-163.
• McNAIR, H.M.; BONNELLI, E.J. Basic chromatography Palo Alto: Varian Instrument Division Office, 1968. p.137-167.
• NETER, J.; WASSERMAN, W. Topics in regression analysis. In: NETER, J.; KUTNER, M.H.; WASSERMAN, W (Ed.) Applied linear statistical models, New York: Springer, 1996. chap.5, p.160-169.
• O'KEEFE, N.M.; McMENIMAN, N.P. The recovery of natural and dosed n-alkanes from the horse. Animal Production in Australia, v.22, p.337, 1998.
• OLIVEIRA, D.E.; PRATES, E.R.; PERALBA, M.C.R. Digestibilidade determinada pelo método indireto usando o n-alcano C35. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.29, p.848-852, 2000.
• OLIVEIRA, D.E. Determinação de alcanos: manual de extração e análise cromatográfica em forragens, concentrados e fezes. Piracicaba: FEALQ, 2004. 30p.
• OLIVEIRA, D.E.; MEDEIROS, S.R.; TEDESCHI, L.O.; AROEIRA, L.J.M.; Da Silva, S.C. Estimating forage intake of lactating dual-purpose cows using chromium oxide and n-alkanes as external markes. Scientia Agricola, v.64, p.103-110, 2007.
• SAS INSTITUTE. SAS/STAT: guide for personal computers. Cary: SAS Institute, 2000. 1v.
• UNTZ, G.; TRANCHANT, J. Manuel pratique de chromatographie en phase gazeuse: détecteur à ionization de flame. 3 ed., Paris: Masson, 1982. 72p.
• VULICH, S.A.; O'RIORDAN, E.G.; HANRAHAN, J.P. Use of n-alkanes for estimation of herbage intake in sheep: accuracy and precision of the estimates. Journal of Agricultural Science, v.116, p.319-323, 1991.

*

Corresponding author <[e-mail]>

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  07 July 2008
• Date of issue
  2008

History

• Accepted
  14 Nov 2007
• Received
  09 Sept 2006