SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número3BIrreversible processes and the accelerated-decelerated phases of the UniverseThe effective dielectric tensor for electromagnetic waves in inhomogeneous magnetized plasmas and the proper formulation in the electrostatic limit índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Brazilian Journal of Physics

versión impresa ISSN 0103-9733

Braz. J. Phys. v.34 n.3b São Paulo sep. 2004

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-97332004000600013 

Refinement of monoclinic ReO2 structure from XRD by Rietveld method

 

 

H.P.S. CorrêaI; I.P. CavalcanteII; L.G. MartinezIII; C.G.P. OrlandoI; M.T.D. OrlandoI

IDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, ES 29060-900, Brazil
IIDepartamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul
IIIInstituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares - IPEN, São Paulo, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

ReO2 presents two crystalline variants, with monoclinic and orthorhombic structures. The former is metastable and irreversibly transforms to an orthorhombic structure above 460ºC. The structure of the latter was determined from studies on monocrystalline samples, whereas for the monoclinic variant there are no single crystals available so far. It was found only one monoclinic variant and the structure associated with this variant is based on studies on polycrystals. We analyzed a monoclinic oxide powder sample by X-ray diffraction and refined its pattern by means of the Rietveld Method. We obtained that the monoclinic variant belongs to space group P21/c, with lattice parameters a = 5.615(3), b = 4.782(2), c = 5.574(2) Å, b = 120.13(1)º.


 

 

Introduction

ReO2 (configuration 5d3) is found in two crystalline variants: monoclinic (a-ReO2) and orthorhombic (b-ReO2). The former is stable only below 300ºC [1]. The crystals obtained in the usual production conditions for this monoclinic variant are not large enough for a single crystal analysis. The second variant exists at higher temperatures and shows up during an irreversible transformation of the monoclinic phase above 460ºC [2].

The two ReO2 variants present crystalline (metallic) conductivity and Pauli paramagnetism [3]. The structures of rhenium oxides were extensively studied by Magnéli [4]. He points to the existence of Re-Re bindings, that influence greatly the arrangement of ReO6 octahedrons and the physical properties of rhenium oxides. Magnéli determined the b-ReO2 structure from single crystal analysis and restated the structure for the a-ReO2 based on several papers on polycrystals [2]. This structure is the same as the one of MoO2 with slightly modified parameters, as originally proposed by Zachariasen [5], based on the great similarity between these two oxides.

There is no data on a-ReO2 in the ICSD (Inorganic Crystal Structure Database - 2000). In the PDF2-ICDD (Powder Diffraction File - International Centre for Diffraction Data - 2000) one only entry (# 17-600) is found, presenting some crystallographic information obtained by Tribalat [6] in 1964, using a Debye-Scherrer chamber. He proposed the P21/c space group, with a = 5.58, b = 4.81, c = 5.50 Å and b = 119.55º. Some objections on these results were raised by Colaïtis [7] in 1972.

 

Experimental

As initial experimental procedure, the ReO3 ( 99.9%, AlfaAesar 62109) was used as calibration compound in order to know the X-ray diffractometer set-up profile. The crystalline parameters of ReO3 was found in ICDD # 33-1096. The ReO3 X-ray diffraction pattern (CuKa) was measured in order to obtain a good ReO2 initial FWHM input parameters (U,V,W). The experimental set-up used for all measurements was a Rigaku DMAX2000 X-ray diffractometer, with Bragg-Bretano geometry, and with pyrolitic carbon monochromator in the diffracted beam. The goodness-of-fit of the ReO3 Rietveld final refinement is represented by S(Rwp/Rexp), and it has shown S = 1.33 as the best fit result. Furthermore, all ReO3 crystalline parameters were confirmed by X-ray absorption measurements, which were performed for Re in the LIII edge (10.525keV) at the XAFS station of National Braziliam Laboratory (LNLS-Campinas-Brasil) [9].

The study of ReO2 started after we had known the U,V,W initial parameters. The structure of a-ReO2 was investigated by X-ray diffraction powder pattern measurements using a 99,9% pure sample, from AlfaAesar (Johnson Matthey Company). The X-ray diffraction pattern was obtained in the Rigaku DMAX2000 X-ray diffractometer set-up described before. CuKa radiation was employed. Data acquisition time was approximately 90 h for the range of 5º to 150º, leading to good statistics, and with 0.01º step, allowing excellent definition to reflection peaks.

 

Rietveld analysis

The information on PDF2 (#17-600) was employed for this initial structure refinement. As the atomic positions of rhenium and oxygen were not known, we have used high simmetry values as initial inputs, namely Re1 (0,0,0), Re2 (1/2,0,0) for rhenium atoms and O1 (1/3,1/4,1/6), O2 (5/6,1/4,1/6) for oxygens.

The refinement was performed using the DBWS code, version # 9807 (2000) [8]. Pseudo-Voigt (pV) profile function was used for the fit of reflection peaks; h > 1 indicated that the peak shape is strongly Lorentzian. As described before, the initial FWHM parameters (U,V.W) were obtained from the ReO3 study [9]. The profile asymmetry caused by the axial divergence of the beam was corrected by means of the model by Riello, Canton and Fagherazzi, which is available in this version of the code. No effects due to surface roughness nor preferable orientation were detected during refinement process. The Fig. 1 shows a graphical representation of the final Rietveld refinement, the experimental data and the difference between them.

 

 

Results and conclusions

Our results led to the conclusion that a-ReO2 belongs to space group P21/c, with lattice parameters a = 5.615(3), b = 4.782(2), c = 5.574(2) Å, b = 120.13(1)º [10] and [11] . The goodness-of-fit, represented by S(Rwp/Rexp) was S = 1.42. The parameters, which represents the quality of the Rietveld refinement, are in the Table I.

 

 

The a-ReO2 structure may be described by an arrangement of ReO6 octahedrons forming straight chains, which are connected one another by the octahedrons having a common vertex, as in rutile. In the rutile the octahedral arrangement presents the metallic atoms equally spaced along the a-axis, whereas in a-ReO2 the rhenium atoms present a spacing modulation along the a-axis, with alternate distances. Through the refinement of the position of the Re2 site we obtained the distance between atoms in the Re-Re coupling, along the a-axis, inside the octahedron chains. Re-Re distances alternate between 2.622(6) and 2.993(6) Å along the chains, which causes the undulation suggested by Gibart in 1967 [4]. Fig. 2 shows the 2D view of the ReO2 structure along the [010] direction. We also performed the refinement of oxygen positions and extracted the relative distances between all pairs of oxygen (O1 and O2) and rhenium (Re1 and Re2) sites. Fig. 3 shows the 2D view along the [001] direction of monoclinic ReO2structure.

 

 

 

 

Table II summarizes the crystalline data description resulting from the final Rietveld refinement.

 

 

Acknowledgments

Research performed at LNLS - National Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Brazil (project # XAS 827/01). The authors would like to thank the Bazilian Agencies CNPq, CAPES and FINEP. Thanks to the Companhia Vale do Rio Doce and Companhia Siderurgica de Tubarão.

 

References

[1] P. Gibart, Bulletin de la Société Chimique de France, 2, 444 (1967).         [ Links ]

[2] D. Colaïtis, C. Lécaille, Materials Research Bulletin, 7, 369 (1972).         [ Links ]

[3] J.B. Goodenough, P. Gibart, J. Brenet, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Academie des Sciences, 261, 2331 (1965).         [ Links ]

[4] A. Magnéli, Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 11, 28 (1957).         [ Links ]

[5] W. H. Zachariasen, A. C. A. Program and Abstracts of Winter Meeting, F4 (1951).         [ Links ]

[6] S. Tribalat, M. L. Jungfleisch, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Academie des Sciences, 259, 1965 (1964).         [ Links ]

[7] D. Colaïtis, D. Lebas, C. Lécaille, Revue de Chimie Minérale, 9, 709 (1972).         [ Links ]

[8] R. A. Young, A. C. Larson, C. O. Paiva-Santos, User's guide to program dbws-9807a for Rietveld analysis of X-ray and neutron powder diffraction patterns with a PC and various other computers. School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, E.U.A. (2000).         [ Links ]

[9] C. G. P. Orlando, et al. Activity Report - LNLS - Campinas, 253 (2001).         [ Links ]

[10] H. P. S. Corrêa, Estudo da estrutura cristalina do ReO3 cúbico e do ReO2 monoclínico por método de difração de raios X de pó, MSc. Thesis, UFES, Brazil (in Portuguese) (2001).         [ Links ]

[11] Corrêa, H. P. S. et al (2001). Activity Report - LNLS - Campinas, 269.        [ Links ]

 

 

Received on 9 January, 2004. Revised version received on 30 January, 2004