Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Structural and magnetic properties of the half-ferromagnetic Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y alloys

Abstract

Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y intermetallic compounds have been prepared by arc melting and studied with X-ray diffraction and magnetization measurements to ascertain the effect of deviations of composition from the stoichiometry on the ferromagnetism of this system. Hysteresis loops registered at room temperature show a soft ferromagnetic behavior in excess Co. In off-stoichiometric alloys the saturation magnetization is lower than in Co2MnAl, whereas the Curie temperature T C is higher in all the studied alloys. T C varies substantially with variations in composition and increases with the Mn content. In the source of this behavior a volume effect is inferred which is expected to lead to strengthened ferromagnetic exchanges.

Heusler alloys; Cobalt; Manganese; Aluminum; Half-ferromagnetic materials


REGULAR ARTICLES

Structural and magnetic properties of the half-ferromagnetic Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y alloys

C. PaduaniI; A. MigliavaccaI; J.C. KrauseII; J.D. ArdissonIII; M.I. YoshidaIV

IDF-UFSC, Florianópolis, CEP 88040-900, SC, Brazil

IIDCET-URI, Santo Ângelo, CEP 98802-470, RS, Brazil

IIICDTN, Belo Horizonte, CEP 30123-970, MG, Brazil

IVDQ-ICEX-UFMG, Belo Horizonte, CEP 31270-901, MG, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y intermetallic compounds have been prepared by arc melting and studied with X-ray diffraction and magnetization measurements to ascertain the effect of deviations of composition from the stoichiometry on the ferromagnetism of this system. Hysteresis loops registered at room temperature show a soft ferromagnetic behavior in excess Co. In off-stoichiometric alloys the saturation magnetization is lower than in Co2MnAl, whereas the Curie temperature TC is higher in all the studied alloys. TC varies substantially with variations in composition and increases with the Mn content. In the source of this behavior a volume effect is inferred which is expected to lead to strengthened ferromagnetic exchanges.

Keywords: Heusler alloys; Cobalt; Manganese; Aluminum; Half-ferromagnetic materials

I. INTRODUCTION

The Heusler alloys[1] are of great current interest because of their theoretically predicted half metallicity[2-4]. Theoretical studies of the microscopic origin of the magnetic anisotropy energy in some Heusler alloys indicated that the magnetic coupling has an orbital character and is mainly between atoms of the same species. Experimental findings have also shown that the magnetic properties of these ordered compounds depend significantly upon degree and type of chemical order[5-8]. The stoichiometric Heusler compound X2YZ crystallizes in the L21 structure (s.g. Fm3m), which consists of four interpenetrating fcc sublattices, each one occupied by one sort of atom. The Co-based compounds particularly possess higher Curie temperature than the other potential half-metallic compounds, and in some cases, a large decrease of the resistivity with the increase of the temperature has been observed as well as a moderately enhanced specific-heat coefficient and a clear Fermi edge.

A study of the phase stability and magnetic properties of Co2Cr1-xFexAl has shown that the occurrence of two-phase separation is unavoidable for x < 0.4, thus leading to a deviation of the saturation magnetic moments from the Slater-Pauling curve[7]. Moreover, it has been reported that the L21 phase becomes stable only for x > 0.7, where no half-metallic behavior is present. In the earlier studies on the Heusler Co2MnAl alloy in order to stabilize the L21 structure was used an annealing of 72 h at 1073 K with a subsequent quenching in water[9, 10]. Reported lattice parameters of the ordered L21 phase are a = 5.754Å [13] and a = 5.749Å [9]; the Curie temperature is 693 K[9]. From electronic structure calculations magnetic moments of 0.745µB and 2.599µB have been obtained for Co and Mn atoms, respectively[4]. In the present investigation we examine the effect of variations in the Mn concentration on the structural and magnetic properties of Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y alloys. Since the Mn atoms are carrying the largest magnetic moment in this phase, the intrinsic magnetic properties are expected to be drastically affected as the Mn content is varied. Results of measurements with the experimental techniques of X-ray diffraction, calorimetry and magnetization are discussed in this context.

II. EXPERIMENT

Polycrystalline Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y alloys were prepared by weighing out the required amounts of the constituent materials and arc melting under argon atmosphere in a water-cooled copper crucible. Ingots were then vacuum sealed in quartz tubes and annealed for 3 days at 1273 K, then for more 3 days at 673 K, followed by cooling in the furnace itself. The compositions of the alloys were determined by energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). Room temperature structural analysis was carried out with conventional X-ray diffractometry using Cu-Ka radiation. The magnetic field dependence of the magnetization (M(H)) was registered at room temperature (300 K) in fields up to 850 kA/m. For the calorimetric measurements (TGA) the samples were encapsulated in evacuated quartz glass to avoid oxidation on heating above room temperature up to about 1000 K.

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

For a large variety of Heusler alloys the fully ordered L21 structure is obtained after a long term annealing in the disordered B2 phase below about 650 K, where the diffusion kinetics are expected to be slow. In some cases a quenching procedure was used to stabilize the B2 phase, whereas in other cases an appropriate annealing followed by furnace cooling (without quenching) was adopted to retain the L21 phase from the B2 phase, as for instance, to obtain the Fe2VAl alloy[,]. The X-ray diffraction patterns of the studied alloys are shown in Fig. 1. A profile analysis of the diffractograms with the Rietveld technique indicates the presence of two phases in these samples: the ordered L21 structure (as the main phase), and a minority phase with a fct structure (s.g. P4/mmm). Some Bragg reflections may be absent due to texturation of the polycrystalline sample. The determined lattice parameters are listed in Table 1, where the indicated compositions are those obtained from the EDX analysis. As it can be seen, close values are observed for the lattice parameters of the ordered L21 phase in all the studied alloys, in spite of the smaller atomic radius of the Co atom as compared to those of both Al and Mn atoms. For Co2MnAl, reported values yield a = 5.754 Å[10] and 5.749Å[9]. With the decrease of the Mn concentration down to about half of the stoichiometry the observed variation of the lattice parameter is < 0.3 %. However, the unit cell volume of these alloys is larger than that of Co2MnAl. In the fct phase, which is tetragonally compressed along the c direction, the cell volume is practically constant and composition independent, despite the variations of a and c.


In Fig. 2 are shown micrographs of the samples taken with EDX. ¿From these it can be seen clearly that these alloys are indeed composed of two phases, which corroborates the results of the X-ray studies. The black spots are voids caused by the etching during surface preparation. From Fig. 2a the formation of two well distinct phases in the Co2.31Mn0.48Al1.21 alloy can be easily identified: the gray region corresponds to the main phase with the L21 structure, while the white region is associated to the minority fct phase. In the spite of the differences in scale, from top to bottom in Fig. 2 one can see how the secondary phase develops and becomes more homogeneously distributed with the increase of the Mn concentration: the white strips tend to proliferate and are becoming shorter in length and more disconnected. One may infer that the morphologies of the two phases appear to be quite different from each other.


The ferromagnetic Curie temperature TC of the studied alloys was obtained with a magnetobalance. The registered traces are shown in Fig. 3. The measuring field was applied by means of pieces with H » 0.5 T. The corresponding TC values are collected in Table 1. For the Co2.31Mn0.48Al1.21 alloy, which has the higher Co content, TC K. This result is higher than the previously reported TC of the stoichiometric alloy (693 K)[13]. As it can be seen in Table 1, with the increase of the Mn concentration the Curie temperature of the L21 phase is sturdily affected. The unfilled d shells of the Co atoms overlap with those of their Mn neighbors, and so direct exchange thereby becomes possible, and the additional d-electrons of Co atoms causes the strengthening of the ferromagnetic exchanges (Co and Mn spin moments are parallel) which increases as the cell volume decreases and inevitably leads to higher TC values. Thus, in the source of the observed increase of TC as compared to Co2MnAl is a volume effect. As the excess Co atoms in these alloys occupy the Mn sites, stronger interactions are taking place as a result of the increase of the overlap of the d-orbitals, which in turns increases TC . On the other hand, note that TC decreases monotonically with the increase of the Mn concentration in the fct phase. The somewhat high TC values observed for this phase indicates that large spin moments can also be expected for both Co and Mn atoms. In table 1 it can be also seen that, in both phases, at higher Al contents lower TC values are observed, as one should expect by considering that the Al atoms carry a null moment. Furthermore, the fct phase in the Co0.76Mn0.16Al0.73 alloy has a lower TC as compared to the Co0.78Mn0.13Al0.88 alloy, thus indicating weaker ferromagnetic exchanges at this composition in this phase. This feature might be associated to the shrink of the lattice along the c direction at this composition.


The hysteresis M(H) loops recorded at room temperature are shown in Fig. 4, which reveal the soft ferromagnetic character of these alloys. Neither remanence nor coercive field are observed. Nevertheless, saturation is attained in applied fields up to about 7 kOe for the Co2.31Mn0.48Al1.21 and Co2.30Mn0.60Al1.10 alloys. In the Co2.29Mn0.57Al1.14 alloy, one sees in Fig. 4 that higher fields are necessary to reach the saturation magnetization, which is higher at this composition. Since any paramagnetic or antiferromagnetic contribution can be ruled out in this case this feature is then associated to the L21 phase, by considering that the relative amount of the ordered phase is overwhelming in this alloy, as indicated from the X-ray analysis. The reported saturation magnetization Ms at 300 K of Co2MnAl is 104 emu/g[9]. The obtained Ms results of the Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y alloys are below this value, which indicates that, as Co replaces for Mn, the average magnetic moment decreases steadily, as a consequence of the fact that the Co atoms have smaller moments. It is noteworthy that, according to results of first-principles calculations, as Cr is substituted for Mn in the fully ordered Co2MnAl alloy, the Co spin moment is not affected and so does its orbital moment[4]. The Co moment was found to be mostly induced by the spin-orbit coupling and is insensitive to hybridization with the neighboring sites.


Nevertheless, in the present study the observed behavior of both TC and Ms can not be explained if one considers that both Co and Mn atoms keep constant moments despite the variations in composition. With the increase of the Mn concentration from Co2.31Mn0.48Al1.21 to Co2.29Mn0.57Al1.14, TC and Ms of the L21 phase increases as a result of the larger moments carried by Mn atoms. Besides, the unit cell volume decreases. Further, from Co2.29Mn0.57Al1.14 to Co2.30Mn0.60Al1.10 the Al concentration decreases and the Mn concentration increases. However, TC is unaffected by these changes although Ms decreases. In the framework of constant magnetic moments for both Co and Mn atoms, by considering that the Mn atoms are carrying the largest moments, there would be no reason for the observed decrease of Ms. No contribution from the fct phase is expected therein, since for these alloys the significative change in composition for this phase is in the Al concentration, which increases. Actually the observed trend is indicative that the atomic moments in these alloys are ruled by a subtle mechanism which is strongly affected by changes in composition.

As a conclusion, the results above indicate that with deviations of composition from the stoichiometry, with excess Co, the ordered L21 structure still can be stabilized in the Co2+x+yMn1-xAl1-y alloys. However, traces of a secondary phase are observed, which has a fct structure. A remarkable result is the high TC observed in these alloys for both L21 and fct phases. In the L21 phase, TC is even higher as compared with Co2MnAl in all the studied alloys. The saturation magnetization at 300 K is higher in the alloy where the unit cell volume is the smallest one. Comparatively, with the variations in the composition of the L21 phase from Co2.31Mn0.48Al1.21 to Co2.29Mn0.57Al1.14 the Curie temperature increases from 706 K to 740 K, whereas the saturation magnetization increases and the cell volume decreases. Hence, with the increase of the Co concentration from the stoichiometry one might expect that the Co atoms occupy the Mn sites in the ordered L21 phase. Thereby the magnetization decreases as a consequence of the smaller Co moments, although a strengthening of the ferromagnetic exchanges takes place, as indicated by the increased TC values of these alloys.

Received on 2 October, 2007

  • [1] F. Heusler, Verhandl. d. Deutschen Physik. Gesellsch. 12, 219 (1903).
  • [2] A. Ayuela, J. Enkovaara, K. Ullakko, and R. M. Nieminen, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 11, 2017 (1999).
  • [3] J. Enkovaara, A. Ayuela, L. Nordström, and R. M. Nieminen, Phys. Rev. B 65, 134422 (2002).
  • [4] I. Galanakis, P. H. Dederichs, and N. Papanikolaou, Phys. Rev. B 66, 174429 (2002); I. Galanakis, Phys. Rev. B 71, 012413 (2005).
  • [5] S. Plogmann, et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 6428 (1999).
  • [6] H. Kubota, J. Nakata, M. Oogane, Y. Ando, H. Kato, A. Sakuma, and T. Miyazaki, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10C913 (2005).
  • [7] K. Kobayashi, R. Y. Umetsu, R. Kainuma, K. Ishida, T. Oyamada, A. Fujita, and K. Fukamichi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 4684 (2004).
  • [8] Y. Miura, K. Nagao, and M. Shirai, Phys. Rev. B 69, 144413 (2004).
  • [9] K.H.J. Buschow and P.G. van Engen, J. Magn. Magn. Mat. 25, 90 (1981).
  • [10] R.A. Dunlap and J.F. Jones, Phys. Rev. B 26, 6013 (1982).
  • [11] M. Kato, Y. Nishino, U. Mizutani, and S. Asano, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter. 12, 1769 (2000).
  • [12] S. Lue, Yang Li, J. H. Ross Jr. and G. M. Irwin, Phys. Rev. B 67, 224425 (2003).
  • [13] P.J. Webster, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 32, 1221 (1971); P. J. Webster and K. R. A. Ziebeck, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 34, 1647 (1973).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    28 Jan 2008
  • Date of issue
    Dec 2007

History

  • Received
    02 Oct 2007
Sociedade Brasileira de Física Caixa Postal 66328, 05315-970 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 3091-6922, Fax: (55 11) 3816-2063 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: sbfisica@sbfisica.org.br