Services on Demand
Print version ISSN 0104-1169
Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem vol.14 no.2 Ribeirão Preto Mar./Apr. 2006
Chemical occupational risks identified by nurses in a hospital environment1
Riesgos ocupacionales químicos identificados por enfermeros que trabajan en ambiente hospitalario
Rosicler XelegatiI; Maria Lúcia do Carmo Cruz RobazziII; Maria Helena Palucci MarzialeIII; Vanderlei José HaasIV
IRN, Hospital São Francisco, PET grant holder in 2001
IIOccupational Nurse, Full Professor, Project Advisor, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
IIIOccupational Nurse, Associate Professor, Project Collaborator, e-mail: email@example.com
IVPhD, Science Professor (PRODOC/ CAPES), e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org. University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development
Hospital nursing workers are exposed to occupational chemical risks. This quantitative study aimed to identify what chemical substances nurses have contact with in their activities, what substances cause health problems and what alterations correspond to possible problems caused by the chemical products they mention. A self-administered data collection instrument was answered by 53 nurses, who mentioned exposure mainly to antibiotics and benzene (100%), iodine (98.1%) and latex-talc (88.7%); the main problem-causing substances mentioned were antineoplastic substances (86.7%), glutaraldehyde (79.2%) and ethylene oxide (75.5%); the described health alterations were: eye watering; allergic reactions; nausea and vomiting, while other health problems that can be caused by the above listed products were not mentioned. These workers need further information on occupational chemical risks, which they could have received in undergraduate or permanent education courses.
Descriptors: occupational risk; risk factors; occupational health; chemical compounds
Trabajadores de enfermería se someten a los riesgos ocupacionales químicos. La finalidad de este estudio cuantitativo fue identificar entre enfermeros con cuales sustancias químicas tienen contacto ocupacional, cuales sustancias pueden causador de problemas en su salud y qué alteraciones están de acuerdo con aquellas que pueden ser ocasionadas por los productos químicos citados. Un instrumento de recopilación de datos auto-administrado fue respondido por 53 enfermeros, que mencionaron que están expuestos principalmente a los antibióticos y benzina (100%), yodo (98,1%) y latex-talco (88,7%); las principales sustancias causadoras de problemas de salud citadas fueron antineoplásicos (86,7%), glutaraldehido (79,2%) y óxido de etileno (75,5%); las alteraciones a la salud que describieron fueron: lacrimación de los ojos; reacciones alérgicas; náuseas y vómitos, sin mencionar otros problemas de salud que pueden ser ocasionados por los productos citados. Estos trabajadores necesitan adquirir mayor conocimiento respecto a los riesgos ocupacionales químicos, que podrían haber recibido en el pregrado o en los cursos de educación continuada.
Descriptores: riesgos laborales; factores de riesgos; salud ocupacional; compuestos químicos
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES
Nursing workers in hospitals are exposed to different occupational risk agents/factors, including chemical substances, which can be inhaled, digested or come in contact with the skin, causing health damage(1). Some circumstances favor this kind of occupational exposure, such as prolonged use of latex gloves; handling of detergents and solvents; manipulation of ultimate generation antineoplastic and antibiotic drugs; inhalation of anesthetic gases; exposure to formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde vapors and sterilizing gas, among others(1-2).
This exposure does not always entail harmful effects on health, which depend on factors like: type and concentration of chemical agent, frequency and duration of exposure, work practices and habits and individual susceptibility(2). Prevention is one way of avoiding occupational health problems caused by exposure; however, for prevention to be effective, workers need to be aware of the risks posed by chemical substances.
This study aimed to identify what chemical substances/compounds hospital nurses are exposed to in daily work; what substances cause health problems and what alterations correspond to possible problems caused by chemical products.
Study type and setting
Quantitative study, carried out among nurses at the emergency care unit of a university hospital (ECUUH) in Ribeirão Preto (SP), subdivided into different sectors, such as urgency care room; hospitalization units, surgical center, recovery, material center and intensive therapy center.
Population and Sample
The institution's human resource department provided a list of 102 nursing workers. Nineteen workers were excluded because of leave of absence. Data collection instruments were handed out to the remaining 83 nurses for completion. However, even after the researchers had insisted, 30 instruments were not returned. Hence, 53 (51.9%) workers participated.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The 53 participants were professionally active nurses who agreed to participate in the study. Forty-nine workers were excluded, some of whom due to (sick or maternity) leave, others were on holiday, some refused to participate and others did not return the data collection instrument to the researchers.
The study was carried out during one month in 2001. Participants worked during morning, afternoon and night shifts and in different nursing work places. The data collection instrument was self-administered, consisted of open/closed questions and was divided in two parts: Worker Identification and Occupational Chemical Risk Data. The tool was previously assessed by three Occupational Health researchers from the University of São Paulo and considered adequate in terms of clarity and contents. Before its application at the ECUUH, it was applied to 10 nurses from another care unit at the same university hospital, who considered the instrument as clear and easy to understand. After this process, the tool was distributed to the participants and later collected.
The study was approved by the board of directors and Research Ethics Committee of the ECUUH. All participants read and signed the Free and Informed Consent Term before filling out the data collection instrument, as determined by the Brazilian National Health Council(3).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Forty-seven (88.7%) participants were women and six (11.3%) were men, which is in line with other research showing that the nursing workforce is mainly female(1,4). Table 1 shows their age range, time in the profession and time worked at the institution.
A majority of workers were between 20 and 30 years old (49%), in fertile age, which causing concern about their exposure to certain chemical agents that are capable of causing reproductive changes1-2). In terms of time worked in nursing (54.7%) and at the ECUUH (62.3%), most respondents had been working for up to five years.
Sixteen (30.2%) participants worked fixed shifts and 37 (69.8%) alternating shifts. In the second group, 10 (27%) worked mornings and afternoons, while 27 (73%) also worked night shifts. Day shifts correspond to six hours of work per day, with a minimum interval of 12 hours between them; the duration of night shifts is 12 hours, followed by 36 hours of rest.
Occupational Chemical Risk Data
Participants confirmed they came in contact with different chemical compounds in their work environment. Table 2 shows the 15 most mentioned substances/compounds.
The five most frequently mentioned chemical agents were: antibiotics and benzene (100% each), iodine (98.1%), latex/talc (88.7%) and glutaraldehyde (71.7%). These are frequently found in hospitals and are used for medication treatment (antibiotics), skin degreasing (benzene), material cleaning/disinfection (glutaraldehyde and sodium hypochlorite), skin asepsis (iodine) and hand protection (latex gloves). In spite of its frequent use in hospital practice, there was little mention of alcohol (9.4%). The few mentions of antineoplastic agents (11.3%) were probably due to the absence of a specific cancer care sector at the ECUUH, so that the participants only carry out chemotherapy procedures occasionally.
Table 3 shows which of the 15 substances mentioned by the workers they indicated as possible causes of health problems.
In spite of their reduced exposure to antineoplastic drugs, 46 participants (86.7%) identified these agents as the most harmful substances for nursing workers' health, followed by glutaraldehyde (79.2%), ethylene oxide (75.5%), antibiotics and formaldehyde (73.6% each), latex/talc (69.8%), nitrous oxide (56.6%), benzene (54.7%) and iodine (52.8%). Few workers indicated ether and alcohol (1.9% each) as possible causes of occupational health problems, possibly because they are commonly used in different nursing tasks and, thus, tend to be depreciated.
Antineoplastic agents are constantly used because of their therapeutic properties; however, these substances exert mutagenic, carcinogenic and teratogenic effects, which pose risks to the workers handling them when appropriate safety measures are not observed(1-2,5). Cytostatic agents, anesthetic gases and sterilizing agents are some of the main causes of reproductive problems, like abortions and congenital malformations, in exposed workers, which confirm the danger of handling these substances(5-7).
The study participants indicated that occupational exposure to the above mentioned substances can cause the health problems shown in Table 4.
Due to the increased use of gloves in hospitals as a result of biosafety concerns, latex has come up as one of the causes of dermatitis and occupational urticaria. Hypersensitivity can be due to latex, talc used in internal glove layers or chemical substances added during rubber processing(8). Our results in terms of latex/talc exposure are in line with literature. Immunological tests can be carried out to identify susceptible workers and, thus, minimize the appearance of these problems.
Participants identified blood alterations as the main problem produced by handling antineoplastic agents. However, these drugs are responsible for several health problems, mainly in terms of human reproduction(5,7,9-10). Occupational exposure risks involve inhalation of aerosols, direct contact with skin and mucous membranes and ingestion of food and medication contaminated with their residues. These can provoke health damage, including chromosome alterations, mutagenicity, infertility, abortion, menstrual disorders and immediate symptoms like dizziness, headache, nausea, mucous alterations and allergic reactions(9). The frequency of menstrual irregularities and amenorrhea is higher among nurses manipulating these agents(10). Spontaneous abortions can occur, mainly during the first three months of pregnancy, besides chromosome alterations and congenital malformations(1,5,11-12). Other manifestations include skin, mucous and eye irritations; hair fall and decreased immunological resistance, increased drug resistance, pharyngitis, hoarseness, herpes and cancer(13). Risks can come from the excretions of chemotherapy patients, since part of these substances continue unaltered or take the form of inactive metabolites, found in patients' feces, urine and vomit. Hence, protective equipment has to be used to handle them(1).
Nurses can inhale, digest or come in skin contact with antibiotics, causing sensitivity. Cephalosporin can cause allergies and allergic rhinitis in anyone exposed(14). Participants associated antibiotics with episodes of diarrhea and allergic reactions, which could also be related to rhinitis.
Another risk is posed by exposure to anesthetic gases (nitrous oxide, halothane), which can cause negative reproductive effects, especially in surgical center workers (nurses, anesthetists, technicians). These substances reduce fertility and increase the incidence of abortions and congenital malformations(1). Spontaneous abortion can occur as a consequence of occupational exposure, mainly in nurses, during the first term of pregnancy(15). Again, results are in line with literature, as participants indicated abortions as health problems caused by these gases. They also mentioned benzene and iodine as other causes of abortion.
Sterilizing solutions, vapors or gases also constitute occupational risk agents. Formaldehyde vapors irritate mucous nose, mouth and eye membranes; they can produce symptoms of sickness, even at low concentrations, and cause dermatitis, edema or larynx spasm, obstructive bronchitis and, occasionally, pulmonary edema(1). Glutaraldehyde can also be a cause of these symptoms; exposure to this substance at 2% among workers at an endoscopy unit revealed eye watering, rhinitis, dermatitis, respiratory difficulties, nausea and headache(16). Participants' information about symptoms like eye watering, although to a limited extent, is in accordance with literature.
Occupation exposure to ethylene oxide is a pertinent source of concern, as this substance causes serious health damage, such as increased cutaneous injuries and conjunctivitis; presence of leukemia, lymphoma, gastric and esophageal neoplasms, liver and kidney dysfunctions, respiratory diseases and decreased hemoglobin, due to the degeneration of amino acids; in case of acute intoxication, symptoms include dyspnea, alterations in level of conscience, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, lymphocytosis, peripheral neuritis and encephalopathy(17). Neoplasms indicated by the participants are in line with literature information about the association between the use of ethylene oxide and clinical symptoms in people exposed.
Although indicated as problem causers, participants did not attribute any health alterations to alcohol, oxygen water, ether and nitrogen.
Most participants were women, between 20 and 30 years old, who had been working as nurses and at the institution for up to 5 years. All nurses indicated they came in contact with chemical substances at their work place. The five most mentioned products were: antibiotics and benzene, iodine, latex/talc and glutaraldehyde.
As to what chemical substances can cause health problems, antineoplastic agents were indicated as causes, as well as formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, ethylene oxide, antibiotics and latex/talc, among others. The nurses believed the following signs and/or symptoms can be caused by chemical products: cutaneous allergic reactions caused by latex/talc; blood alterations by antineoplastic agents; diarrhea by antibiotics; eye watering, nausea and/or vomiting and spontaneous abortions by nitrous oxide and eye watering by formaldehyde and glutaraldehyde, among others.
However, participants did not indicate clinical alterations mentioned in literature, which shows that their knowledge about the chemical occupational risk factors they are exposed to is still insufficient. To minimize this situation, this theme should be included in undergraduate nursing course curricula and permanent in-service education, explaining appropriate safety measures to decrease occupational risks, particularly chemical risks, and their harmful effects on workers' health.
1. Bulhões I. Riscos do trabalho de enfermagem. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Folha Carioca; 1998. [ Links ]
2. Xelegati R, Robazzi. MLCC. Riscos químicos a que estão submetidos os trabalhadores de enfermagem: uma revisão da literatura. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem 2003 maio-junho; 11(3):350-6. [ Links ]
3. Conselho Nacional de Saúde (BR). Resolução 196/96, de 10 de outubro de 1996. Diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisa envolvendo seres humanos. Cad Ética em Pesquisa 1998; 1(1):34-42. [ Links ]
4. Conselho Federal de Enfermagem. (BR). O exercício de enfermagem nas instituições de saúde: 1982/1983. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): COFEN/ABEn; 1985. [ Links ]
5. Mc Diarmid MA, Agnew J. Efeitos do trabalho sobre a reprodução. In: Mendes R. Patologia do trabalho. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Atheneu; 1995. p. 395-406. [ Links ]
6. Figa-Talamanca I. Reproductive problems among women health care workers: epidemiologic evidence and preventive strategies. Epidemiol Rev 2000; 22(2):249-60. [ Links ]
7. Ahlborg G, Hemminki K. Reproductive effects of chemical exposures in health-professions. J Occup Environ Med 1995 aug; 37(8):957-61. [ Links ]
8. Leal CHS, Iguti AM. Urticária: uma revisão sobre os aspectos clínicos e ocupacionais. Rev Bras Saúde Ocup 1995/1996; 25(95/96):77-100. [ Links ]
9. Rocha FL, Marziale MHP, Robazzi MLCC. Perigos potenciais a que estão expostos os trabalhadores de enfermagem na manipulação de quimioterápicos antineoplásicos: conhecê-los para preveni-los. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem 2004 maio/junho; 12(3):511-7. [ Links ]
10. Shortridge LA. Assessment of menstrual vaiability in working populations. Reprod Toxicol 1988; 2:171-6. [ Links ]
11. Laffon B, Teixeira JP, Silva S, Loureiro J, Torres J, Pasaro E, Mendes J, Mayan O. Genotoxic effects in a population of nurses handling antineoplastic drugs, and relationship with genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair enzymes. Am J Industrial Med 2005 Aug; 48(2):128-36. [ Links ]
12. Milkovic-Kraus S, Horvat D. Chromosomal abnormalities among nurses occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs. Am J Ind Med 1991; 19(6):771-4. [ Links ]
13. Monteiro ABC. Biossegurança no preparo, administração e descarte de agentes antineoplásicos injetáveis pela equipe de enfermagem. [dissertação]. Ribeirão Preto (SP): Escola de enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto/USP; 2001. [ Links ]
14. Foti C, Bonamonte D, Trenti R, Venã GA, Angelini G. Occupational contact allergy to cephalosporins. Contact Dermat 1997; 36(2):104-5. [ Links ]
15. Saurel-Cubizolles MJ, Hays M, Estryn-Behar M. Work in operating rooms and pregnancy outcome nurses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1994; 66(4):235-41. [ Links ]
16. Jachuck SJ, Bound CL. Occupational hazard in hospital staff exposed to 2 per cent glutaraldehyde in on endoscopy unit. J Soc Occup Med 1989; 39(2):69-71. [ Links ]
17. Nogueira MH, Costa MGP, Sanches EL, Avelar MCQ. Estudo do nível de impregnação do ar ambiental pelo óxido de etileno. parte 1. Enfoque 1984; 12(2):32-5. [ Links ]
Recebido em: 10.2.2005
Aprovado em: 22.12.2005
1 This study was extracted from the Research Project "Verbalization of nurses in Ribeirão Preto about chemical occupational risks in the hospital environment", financed by the University of São Paulo Special Training Program (PET)