SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue5Nurses' understanding of standard precautions at a public hospital in Goiania - GO, BrazilEvaluation of cleaning and disinfection performance of automatic washer disinfectors machines in programs presenting different cycle times and temperatures author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

Print version ISSN 0104-1169

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem vol.14 no.5 Ribeirão Preto Sept./Oct. 2006

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000500014 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Knowledge on diabetes mellitus in the self care process1

 

 

Ana Emilia PaceI; Kattia Ochoa-VigoII; Maria Helena Larcher CaliriI; Ana Paula Morais FernandesI

IRN, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing - WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, e-mail: aepace@eerp.usp.br, mhcaliri@eerp.usp.br, anapaula@eerp.usp.br
IIRN, PhD, Guest Professor, Faculty of Nursing, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia - UPCH, Peru, e-mail: kvope@latinmail.com

 

 


ABSTRACT

This descriptive study in the interior of São Paulo aimed to verify diabetes mellitus patients' knowledge about the disease, causes and complications, highlighting its importance in self care. Data were collected through interviews with 84 persons and analyzed through descriptive statistics. Average age was 53.3±13 years, time of disease 12.9±9 years and 58% of the participants did not finish basic education. Only 28.6% of the participants gave correct answers to "what is diabetes" and "what are its causes"; 71% were diagnosed without presenting classic symptoms and 64% had already been hospitalized due to an acute or chronic complication. We indicated aspects that turn the learning process more difficult; little knowledge about the disease, its causes and symptoms, thus affecting the prevention and early diagnosis and entailing predisposition towards complications. Furthermore, the interference of biopsychosocial factors in the self care process is highlighted.

Descriptors: nursing; diabetes mellitus; knowledge and self care


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Chronic health conditions are responsible for 60% of the global disease burden. In developing countries, treatment adherence reaches a mere 20%, generating negative health statistics and entailing high costs for families, society and governments(1).

In this group of health conditions, diabetes mellitus stands out because of high morbidity and mortality rates, as well as increasing prevalence levels. Diabetes mellitus requires clinical care and permanent education to prevent acute and chronic complications(2).

Ambiguities and uncertainties provoked by diabetes mellitus lie at the basis of patients' demands/needs, which can be immediate or long term. The demands/needs deriving from diabetes have been categorized as psychosocial, self-care and related to knowledge and skills(3).

Thus, integral care for diabetes patients should cover psychosocial and cultural aspects. Therapeutic education is fundamental to inform, motivate and strengthen patients and families to live with the chronic condition. Each care session needs to reinforce health risk perception, skills development and motivation to overcome this risk(4).

According to literature, health care that provides adequate information, support and monitoring can improve adherence, which will reduce the burden of chronic conditions and provide a better quality of life to diabetes patients(1). In this sense, it is important to be able to detect and act on the patient's signs of readiness for behavior and lifestyle changes(3).

With a view to supporting care for diabetes mellitus patients and identifying probable factors that intervene in this process, this study aimed to verify these patients' knowledge about the disease, causes and complications, highlighting its importance in self-care.

 

METHODOLOGY

We carried out a descriptive and cross-sectional study at the Endocrinology and Metabology Outpatient Clinic of the Clinical Hospital at the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing (HCFMRP-USP), Brazil, between April 2000 and April 2001. During this period, 659 male and female patients with diabetes mellitus were attended, who were older than 20. Eighty-four of these patients volunteered for the study.

Participants were selected through the outpatient care files and were invited to participate when they came to the clinic. Volunteers received and signed the free and informed consent term.

Data were collected through an interview, held in a private room. The researcher and/or her assistant applied a semi-structured instrument before or after the medical appointment. Interviews took an average of 45 minutes.

The instrument was previously submitted to face and content validation by professionals active in this area and tested during the pilot study. Modifications were made on the basis of the suggestions and difficulties/limitations that had been identified. The first part of the instrument included demographic data, about smoking and sedentariness; the second part covered data related to knowledge about the disease, such as: what is diabetes and what are its causes, laboratory tests for diagnosis and control and, in addition, acute and chronic complications.

Answers related to knowledge and causes of diabetes were classified in the following categories: correct, partially correct, wrong and does not know. For the correct category, a minimum of two correct answers was considered, against one for the partially correct category; the wrong category referred to incorrect answers and those not related to the question; does not know was used when the patient expressed this phrase.

Data were analyzed through categorization and transcription into a structured database, using Excel. Then, data were processed in EPIINFO, by means of descriptive statistics.

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the HCFMRP-USP.

 

RESULTS

The study population's average age was 53.3±13.4 years, 58.5% possessed less than eight years of education and 38.1% were widowed/single. Average disease time as indicated by patients was 12.5±8.5 years (Table 1).

 

 

Table 2 shows answer categories about what is diabetes? and what are its causes? Answers were crossed to highlight participants' knowledge.

When participants were asked about normal blood glucose levels, only 24 (8.6%) gave a correct answer, i.e. between 70 and 110 mg/dl, while 21 (25%) mentioned only one of these levels. Twenty-two participants' answers (26.2%) were considered incorrect because they did not fit into this range and 17 (20.2%) patients could not answer.

In view of the importance of recognizing signs and symptoms of the disease and early diagnosis, which can motivate people to seek professional health care, participants were asked about the main complaints that led to the diabetes diagnosis (Table 3).

 

 

We also verified whether participants knew that badly controlled diabetes can cause other health problems. Eighty-one (96.4%) gave a positive answer and indicated acute and chronic complications. Table 4 displays the 276 answers we obtained.

 

 

DISCUSSION

We found a relatively young adult population, including more women (56%), retired or housewives (73.8%), with unfinished basic education (58.3%); average disease time of more than ten years, and 85.7% were type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

A recent study(5) of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients of long duration, aimed at describing the clinical, psychological and social factors interfering in knowledge, identified unsatisfactory knowledge about the disease, strongly influenced by age, years of education, treatment time, cognitive function, gender and depression level.

Another study of diabetes patients(6), aimed at assessing knowledge and disease management, as well as the relation between this knowledge and diabetes control, showed that adequate knowledge level was not related to glucose control. The same study reported that knowledge is only one of the variables able to influence metabolic control, and that lifestyle and beliefs can also exert strong impact on people's behavior.

Low education levels can certainly limited information access, due to possible reading, writing, comprehension or even speech problems(7). This condition can reduce access to health-care related learning opportunities, especially when acknowledging that, in general, adult patients are responsible for their own daily care.

Persons with this education level also seem to attach less value to disease prevention actions and tend to seek medical care with some delay, which entails a great impact on and high demands for financial resources directed at health care(7). In addition, this delay can stimulate the worsening of the disease.

In this sense, diabetes patient education stands out as a fundamental care aspect to control the disease and, thus, prevent or delay the appearance of acute and chronic complications, helping patients to promote quality of life.

The disease's early development and natural history should be sufficiently well understood to identify disease progression measurement parameters. Even if studies demonstrate a strong relation between the incidence of diabetes, fasting hyperglycemia and glucose intolerance, other factors, independently associated with the development of the disease, such as age, family history, waist-hip ratio, body mass index, arterial pressure and lipid levels, should also be taken into account(2).

The general population needs to understand these risk factors, whether separately or jointly, with a view to the inclusion of primary prevention actions in daily behavior. Data in Table 2 reveal the fragility of this aspect, as only 24 (28.6%) patients gave correct answers about diabetes and its causes.

We could also observe lack of knowledge about the same questions in the study population's relatives(8), which represents yet another complicating factor for diabetes management, as relatives are considered to be the closest support for chronic disease patients.

Another relevant aspect is patients' knowledge of desirable standards of normality for glucose, identified in 24 (28.6%) participants. Knowledge about these levels can stimulate patients' involvement in self-care, if they are aware that their glucose level can vary within a certain range, and thus help in daily glucose monitoring.

On the one hand, we identified a lack of knowledge, associated with disease time, age and education. On the other, there is the complex process of obtaining information and knowledge about the pathogeny of diabetes, as well as their incorporation in care. This characterizes a problem in the study population, which deserves emphasis and strengthens the need for innovative strategies to promote this population's adherence to treatment and obtain greater participation in education programs.

During the long course of the disease, diabetes patients may have received some kind of information about its pathogeny. However, factors intervening in the process of obtaining this information may have limited/impeded its incorporation. In this sense, socioeconomic and cultural factors facilitate/difficult knowledge, besides personal aspects (social/family support, psychological aspects and disease perception) and health service access.

One way of addressing relevant aspects of diabetes care is the constitution of systemized orientation groups or education programs. However, it is important for these programs to take into account the characteristics of the target population, which will make them look for strategies that are useful to each group, considering age, cognitive level, skills, limitations, availability and interests.

In our study, 20 (23.8%) participants informed they had participated or were participating in an orientation group (data not included). A study at the same outpatient unit, aimed at analyzing difficulties these patients mentioned to participate in education groups, also found low participation levels. Related causes were: lack of interest, inadequate time and transport difficulties, while more than 40% were not aware that this group existed(9).

The above factors should be considered when transmitting information to patient, with a view to favoring knowledge incorporation and adequate treatment follow-up, which should be proposed in partnership between the patient and the health professional, in accordance with individual needs. Education group programs should be disseminated appropriately and continuously, making available meeting times, to obtain better reception in the target population.

When asked about what laboratory tests were used to diagnose diabetes, 41 (48.8%) participants mentioned the blood test and 28 (33.3%) blood and urine. With respect to exams to control diabetes over time, 72 (85.7%) patients indicated blood and urine tests and (8.3%) only blood tests (data not included). Other tests, such as cholesterol dosage (HDL, LDL), triglycerides and kreatinin, are important parameters to assess metabolic control but receive little emphasis in care for diabetes patients.

Another aspect that does not receive much attention is blood pressure control, considering arterial hypertension as a common comorbidity of diabetes(2). A randomized prospective clinical study(10) of about 7000 recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients showed a significant relation between the incidence of macro and microvascular complications and increased systolic blood pressure. Each 10 mmHg decrease in average systolic blood pressure corresponded to a 12% decrease in risk for any diabetes-related complication.

Data related to chronic micro and macrovascular complications of the population in this study were discussed in a previous article(11).

Classical symptoms that made people seek health care included polydipsia and polyuria, to a reduced extent (Table 3). However, in most patients, diabetes was diagnosed as a consequence of other health problems.

Between nine and 12 year passes between the start of hyperglycemia and the type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis, due to the fact that glucose concentration is not sufficiently high for the appearance of classical symptoms(12). This increases the risk of micro and macrovascular complications(2,13-14).

As to the presence of acute and chronic complications of diabetes, Table 4 shows hyperglycemia, eye problems, foot problems and hypoglycemia. These suggest that the study population has received information about the severity of the disease.

Data not included here demonstrated that 54 (64.3%) participants had already been hospitalized for one of these complications, with an average hospitalization time of 3.1 days. Considering multiple answers, the most frequent problems were hyperglycemia (63.0%), coma (14.8%), hypoglycemia (13.0%) and foot problems (11.1%). These data can be related to the duration and bad control of diabetes, indicating a population at risk for complications.

Approximately 33% of diabetes patients are hospitalized during the first years of the disease due to acute complications, which can be prevented through adequate glucose control. Hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis represent 24% of problems at emergency services(14).

In summary, these data reveal the fragility of preventive actions, due to scarce basic knowledge about the disease, causes, signs/symptoms, management and prevention of acute and chronic complications.

The contents examined here are usually included in diabetes education programs. However, participation levels are low, possibly due to access difficulties, availability and personal motivation.

Some reasons for low participation in these groups can be attributed to the fact that these patients only seek medical care in acute situations. On the other hand, the number of health professionals available for exclusive dedication to education and prevention activities is still insufficient. Another factor is professional training, which prioritizes curative actions to the detriment of prevention.

Professionals active in education/prevention should be familiar with education strategies that allow them to adapt to the needs and limitations of participating adults, understanding that, in general, this group possesses low education levels and may not be interested in this type of care. Information contents need to be transmitted in a simple way, however, guaranteeing impact in the target population, motivating people to learn about the disease and actively assume their role in treatment and care, integrating their personal structure, beliefs and psychosocial state.

Some strategies for this type of population include theories related to the health belief model, self-efficacy, control locus, cognitive dissonance, diffusion, learning stages and finally, adult theory(7).

Each of these theories requires broad knowledge and practice, in line with the health professional's and the target population's understanding. These strategies for interrelation between participants and professionals can be of help in participants' learning. This can lead to better treatment follow-up, highlighting patients as protagonists in care for their disease.

Information provided in learning should be significant to the person. If not, it will not be integrated into that person's stock of knowledge and skills. Therefore, getting to know participants' previous interests and knowledge is an important phase in the education process(6). In this context, activities need to be programmed according to the identified needs and each situation context, including risk levels for complications.

Knowledge about diabetes and its importance in the self-care process allows us to value the need to create awareness in the population about risk factors for the development of diabetes, as well as chronic complications among patients. These aspects should be included in education programs and diabetes mellitus tracking campaigns, with a view to arousing motivation and interest.

 

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated aspects that difficult the learning process, such as age (mean 53.3±13 years), disease time (mean 12.9±9 years) and low education level (58% had unfinished basic education). These conditions can limit the incorporation of information in this population and, consequently, jeopardize prevention and early diagnosis, besides predisposing to complications.

We also revealed other aspects interfering in the learning process, such as biopsychosocial factors and health service access.

With respect to knowledge about "what is diabetes?" and "what are its causes?", we found that only 24 (28.6%) participants gave correct answers, while 24 (28.6%) patients gave wrong answers or did not know the answer.

Considering multiple answers, 71% of the study population was diagnosed without presenting classical diabetes symptoms, and 64% had already been hospitalized due to acute or chronic complications, such as hyperglycemia (63.0%), coma (14,8%), hypoglycemia (13.0%) and foot problems (11.0%).

These results shows the fragility of knowledge about diabetes, causes and complications for disease management, which can be related to factors intrinsic to patients and to the health system, complicating access to basic information. This reveals the need for health professionals to redirect strategies for care to diabetes patients, in view of biopsychosocial factors and existing resources at the health unit.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This article results from the Integrated CNPq project - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, 520309/98-7, called "The nurse in the prevention and early detection of lower limb complications in diabetes mellitus patients", carried out between March 1999 and February 2001.

Thanks to Prof. Moacyr Lobo da Costa Junior, for his advice in the structuring of the data collection instrument. To nurse Andréa Mathes Faustino, for her collaboration in data collection as an undergraduate student, and to Dr. Miyeko Hayashida, laboratory specialist nurse at EERP-USP, for her statistical support.

 

REFERENCES

1. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Cuidados inovadores para condições crônicas: componentes estruturais de ação. Relatório Mundial. Brasília: OMS; 2003.        [ Links ]

2. American Diabetes Association. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2004; 27(Suppl 1):28-32.        [ Links ]

3. Armstrong N. Coping with diabetes mellitus: a full time job. Nurs Clin North Am 1987; 22(3):559-68.        [ Links ]

4. Garcia R, Suarez R. La educación en diabetes: algunas reflexiones para la práctica. Rev Asoc Am Diabetes 1999; 7(3):170-7.        [ Links ]

5. Murata GH, Shah JH, Adam KD, Wendel CS, Bokhari SU, Solvas PA, et al. Factors affecting diabetes knowledge in type 2 diabetic veterans. Diabetologia 2003; 46:1176-8.        [ Links ]

6. Coates VE. Educational issues relating to people with long-term health problems. In. Coates VE Education for patients and clients. London: Rutledge; 1999. p.135-60.        [ Links ]

7. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. The literature problem. In. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH Teaching patients with low literacy skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott;1995. p.1-9.        [ Links ]

8. Pace AE, Nunes PD, Ochoa-Vigo K. O conhecimento dos familiares acerca da problemática do portador de diabetes mellitus. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem 2003 maio-junho; 11(3):312-9.        [ Links ]

9. Cazarini RP, Zanetti ML, Ribeiro KP, Pace AE, Foss MC. Adesão a um grupo educativo de pessoas portadoras de diabetes mellitus: porcentagem e causas. Medicina 2002; 35:142-50.        [ Links ]

10. Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HAW, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, Cull CA, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321:412-9.        [ Links ]

11. Pace AE, Foss MC, Ochoa-Vigo K, Hayashida M. Fatores de risco para complicações em extremidades inferiores de pessoas com diabetes mellitus. Rev Bras Enfermagem 2002; 55(5):514-21.        [ Links ]

12. Harris MI, Klein R, Welborn TA, Knuiman MW. Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4-7 Yr. befor clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care 1992; 15(7):815-9.        [ Links ]

13. Nazimek-Siewniak B, Moczulski D, Grzeszczak W. Risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes results of longitudinal study design. J Diabetes Complications 2000; 16:271-6.        [ Links ]

14. Clement S. Diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care 1995; 18(8):1204-14.        [ Links ]

 

 

Recebido em: 2.3.2005
Aprovado em: 11.7.2006

 

 

1 Article extracted from integrated project with CNPq support 520309/98-7