versão impressa ISSN 0104-1169
Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem vol.20 no.2 Ribeirão Preto mar./abr. 2012
Effectiveness of an educational program in nursing in the self-care of patients with heart failure: randomized controlled trial1
María de los Ángeles Rodríguez-GázquezI; Edith Arredondo-HolguínII; Richard Herrera-CortésIII
IPhD, Associate Professor, Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
IIMSc, Associate Professor, Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
IIIUndergraduate student, Research Incubator Kairos, Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia
Unblinded randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an educational program in nursing (educational meetings, home visits, telenursing and a printed book) in the improvement of self-care behaviors in patients with heart failure was evaluated. Thirty-three people participated in the intervention group and thirty in the control group. At the beginning and at the end of the study (ninth month), Nancy Artinian's Heart Failure Self-care Behaviors Scale was applied to assess the level of self-care. 66.0% of the intervention group versus 26.6% of the control group improved the self-care score by at least 20% (p<0.001). The Number Needed to Treat was 2.5. The findings suggest that the educational intervention has beneficial effects on the self-care behaviors of people with heart failure.
Descriptors: Heart Failure; Self-Care; Education, Nursing; Randomized Controlled Trial.
Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome characterized by high mortality, frequent hospitalization, poor quality of life, multiple comorbidities and a complex therapeutic regimen, resulting in structural or functional cardiac alterations, limiting the heart's ability to fill itself with and expulse blood during the cardiac cycle(1). At the global level, HF is considered a severe public health problem because of its extremely high morbidity and mortality rates(2) and the enormous economic and social costs it generates for patients, their families, health care providers and society in general(3). The increased prevalence of HF in recent decades is due, among other reasons, to population aging and to higher survival rates, as a result of improvements in diagnosis and treatment methods(4).
The extreme fatigue these patients are victims of, due to the low perfusion of body tissues, influences the worsening of quality of life and personal and social roles and leads to a progressive loss of self-care abilities(5); as a result, one of the main challenges nursing faces in care delivery to HF patients is to improve self-care, which Orem defines as the practice of activities that individuals initiate and perform on their own behalf, consciously and continuously, in maintaining life, development, health and well being(6).
It is known that the main conduct-related risk factors for HF are susceptible to intervention through educational programs, which over time results in decreased probability of readmission and premature death(7). Educational interventions involving HF patients include different strategies: educational meetings(8-10), use of printed educational material distributed during the sessions(10), home visits(9) and telephone follow-up(8) ; which not only improve patients' knowledge about the disease(11), but also affect the self-management of their disease(8).
As for the type of professionals to deliver education, a review of 29 educational intervention studies involving HF patients(12) revealed that one of the elements that determined their success was the use of nurses with considerable knowledge, especially concerning the teaching and valuation of self-care behaviors.
This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an educational nursing program for the improvement of self-care behaviors in heart failure patients.
Unblinded randomized controlled clinical trial.
Patients ≥ 30 years of age who attended the cardiovascular health program at a hospital institution in Medellín (Colombia) in 2010, with a confirmed HF diagnosis compatible echocardiogram and clinical symptoms and NYHA functional class from I to III -, without alterations in consciousness levels and who had not reached the terminal phase. Patients were divided between the intervention and control groups, depending on whether or not they received the educational nursing intervention. All patients received the usual care (consultations: medical, nursing, psychology or nutrition) established by the health institution, according to their individual needs, which is why the educational intervention should be considered additional care.
95% confidence level, 80% power, minimum proportion of 70% of patients in the study group versus 30% in the control group, who improved their self-care behavior score by at least 20%; the minimum sample size was of 24 people in each study group.
Randomization of the intervention: Participants were assigned to the groups with the help of a table with random numbers. A document was elaborated with the randomization keys, in which the numerical codes were arranged in increasing order, preceded by the group corresponding to the previous random designation. Codes were assigned as participants were included in the study, with code 01 for the first person, 02 for the second and so on.
Intervention: The educational activities were aimed at the HF patients and their families. The following five aspects were prioritized for the educational intervention: knowledge on the disease, adherence to pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, request for help during the disease, adaptation to life with the disease and the effects of the medication, and self-concept as an element that permits patients' empowerment and motivation for their care and their management of resources to adapt to life with the disease. The duration of the educational nursing program was nine months, during which group encounters were held, as well as telenursing sessions and home visits. To support the intervention activities, the educational booklet "Developing self-care behaviors: a way to cope with heart failure" was designed for use by patients and caregivers. The researchers developed all of these activities. In Figure 1, each of the activities developed with the study groups is detailed.
Figure 2 displays the research flow chart.
Information collection instrument. A four-part instrument was designed, including: a) demographic information: age, gender, marital status, occupation and education level; b) information on social support: family, friends and health institution; c) clinical information: comorbidity, functional class, ejection fraction, hospitalizations and death; and d) Artinian's Heart Failure Self-care Behaviors Scale(13). This scale derives from Dorothea Orem's self-care deficit theory(6), validated for use in Colombia(14) with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.76 (men: 0.73 and women: 0.77). This scale comprises 28 items that measure the frequency of self-care behaviors, distributed in six dimensions (request for help, adaptation to life with the disease, adaptation to therapeutic regimen, awareness-gaining, modifying one's self-concept and self-acceptance, learning to live with heart failure and treatment effects).
A Likert format was adopted for response alternatives (0=never, 1=few times, 2=most of the time, and 3=all the time). Scores are inverse for items 16 and 24. The total score is the sum of scores for the 28 items, with higher scores corresponding to higher self-care levels.
The patient self-reported data on the self-care scale and sociodemographic and social support variables, while information on clinical variables was obtained directly from the clinical history.
SPSS software, version 19.00 (Chicago, USA) was used to analyze the collected information. The analysis plan was developed according to the proposed objectives. All ratio variables were examined for outliers and non-normal distributions; except for number of hospitalizations, which did not show this type of distribution.
The research variables were compared per study group, using the statistics indicated for independent samples, as follows: a) proportion difference: the X2 was applied for expected counts in the cells of the contingency tables ≥5, if not, Yates' correction for continuity was used; b) difference of means: Student's t-test was used; c) difference of medians: Mann-Whitney's U-test was used. In all cases, statistical significance was assumed for probability values below 0.05. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess inter and intra subject variability in self-care scale scores from baseline to the final evaluation. Mauchly's W test was used to assess the sphericity of the variance-covariance matrix. In case of compliance with the sphericity premise, the F-test was used to indicate whether the hypothesis of equality between the study groups could be accepted or rejected, concerning the self-care scale scores at both evaluation moments. The contrast used in this procedure is polynomial to the repeated measure factors, which permitted studying whether the existing relation between the factor (study group) and the dependent variable (self-care score) is linear. To assess the possible confounding and/or interaction effect of certain variables in the relation between the dependent (final self-care scale score at least 20% better than baseline) and the independent variable (study group), two strategies were used:
a) Stratified analysis. To assess the confounding effect of third variables on the relation under analysis. Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) X2 test was applied, with their respective probability value. It was considered that no confounding effect existed if the Odds Ratios, whether crude or corrected by M-H, were similar. In addition, it was examined whether the potentially confounding variable moderated the effect, i.e. it was presumed that interaction existed in case of differences in the comparison of the strata's OR.
b) Logistic regression analysis. After the stratification, as described earlier, a stepwise logistic regression model was elaborated. The dependent variable was defined as the percentage of change in the self-care scale scores between baseline and final measure, which was dichotomized with 20% set at the cut-off, previously established through a consensus among the researchers as a minimum positive change percentage (≥20%=1, ≤19%=0). The power of the association between the independent and dependent variables was estimated through the constant e (2,71828) and the estimated power of the b parameter for the exposure of interest. Statistical significance of the estimated parameter was interpreted according to a probability of less than 0.05. The final logistic regression model obtained the best goodness-of-fit after simultaneously adjusting for the confounding variables detected in the stratified analysis. The potential interaction effect of the independent variables as possible effect modifying variables was assessed through the OR per stratum, considering that the CI95% would not include 1.0.
The magnitude of the intervention effect was analyzed by comparing the proportion of patients in both study groups that obtained a self-care scale score at least 20% better, adopting the intention-to-treat analysis principles, i.e. taking into account all patients from each group in the denominator, even those lost because of death. Then, the absolute increase in the benefit and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated.
This research received Institutional Review Board approval from the School of Nursing at Universidad de Antioquia. The main ethical aspects respected were: a) signing of informed consent for participation, b) confidentiality of information collected for the research, and c) benefit for the control group: at the end of the study, control group patients received a four-hour educational session, during which the main themes addressed during the activities developed with the intervention group were presented. In addition, these patients received the educational booklet.
This research is registered under code COL321 in the Latin American Ongoing Clinical Trial Register (LATINREC) of the Iberoamerican Cochrane Network.
In this study, 33 people participated in the intervention group and 30 in the control group. Table 1 shows that both study groups have comparable characteristics, which significant differences for the variables main activity developed during the day (25.0% in the intervention group versus 56.7% in the control group develop no activities) and education level (27.3% in the intervention group versus 43.3% in the control group have no degree) only. In general terms, one may say that most of the participants were older adults, married, in socioeconomic group 2, with a primary or higher education degree and who received support mainly from family and health institutions. Concerning the clinical variables, without group distinctions, most patients were classified in NYHA functional class 2, with an ejection fraction below 50% and arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and congestive heard disease as the main comorbidities. During the study period, nine out of ten patients in the intervention group and eight out of ten patients in the control group were hospitalized, -with one as the median hospitalization number in both group -, and one out of ten patients in each group died due to causes linked to their HF.
Analysis of repeated measures
In this study, 29 patients from the intervention group and 26 patients from the control group completed both self-care scale evaluations. In the ANOVA model with repeated measures, Mauchly's W corresponded to 1.00. Therefore, sphericity was assumed and the F-test was used (F=42.78, p<0.001), which indicated a linear relation between the score and the study group. Table 2 also reveals that, although both groups got better scores over time, the difference between both assessment times corresponds to 12.2 points in the intervention group, against only 5.1 points in the control group.
Control of confounding variables
As observed in Table 3, there was practically no confounding effect in the variables that measured support from family and friends and no support; this was the case for the remaining variables: the OR was underestimated for gender and institutional support, but overestimated for the development of some activity during the day. Concerning interaction with variables in the stratification, this was strong for the variables: gender (higher in men), support from friends (higher in participants who received support), education level (higher among participants with a degree) and development of some daytime activity (higher in participants with activities).
The logistic regression model with the best goodness-of-fit (X2=15.11, p=0.004), after simultaneous adjustment for confounding variables detected among those listed in Table 3, found a statistically significant relation (p<0.001) with the variables study group and level. In the first, the probability of a better self-care level is 5.9 times higher in the intervention than in the control group (CI95%OR=1.7-20.8); and, concerning education level, for every person without a degree who improves the self-care score by at least 20%, there are 1.6 (CI95%OR=1.2-2.0) people with a primary education and 6.1 (CI95%OR=5.6-6.9) people with a secondary degree who also improved.
Effectiveness of the educational program to improve self-care
The intention-to-treat analysis showed that 66.0% (CI95%: 42.1%-76.5%) of the intervention group, versus 26.6% (CI95%:12.9%-46.1%) of the control group, improved their self-care scale score by at least 20%, with a statistically significant difference (X2=7.33, p=0.006), for an OR of 4.2 (CI95%:1.4-12.3). The absolute difference between the groups for an improvement of at least 20% in the scale score under analysis corresponded to 39.4% (CI95%: 16.8%-62.0%), while the NNT equaled 2.5 (CI95%:1.6-5.9), which means that 2.5 people have to be treated with the educational intervention for one to improve his/her self-care score by at least 20%.
In this study, in which the effectiveness of a nursing educational program was evaluated to improve the self-care of HF patients, although both groups improved their mean score on the scale used for the first and second assessment, people who received the intervention revealed a substantial change in comparison with the control group. This is in line with a study in which the quality of life of HF patients was assessed before and after an educational intervention(5), and with another in which the knowledge, behaviors, satisfaction and quality of life of HF patients who attended an educational program with nursing participation was compared with a control group(15). The better self-care score in the control group, although not to the same extent as in the intervention group, can be attributed to the fact that all patients involved in this research continued to receive the regular care the health institution offered, which included education by health professionals. Therefore, the improvement in self-care behaviors could also be due to the learning achieved in that way(16) during the follow-up time in this study. The absolute difference between the groups for the improvement of at least 20% in the self-care scale score corresponded to 39%, which can be considered high and corresponds to the effect that could be attributed to the educational intervention.
The NNT found was 2.5, which indicates an additional goodness of the intervention, as, after receiving the intervention for at least seven months, one in every 2.5 patients would improve his/her self-care scale score by at least 20%. This is very promising, even without calculating the cost-benefit of the economic resources saved in the treatment of HF complications, without mentioning the increased quality of life of patients with this condition.
Considering that educational programs not only aim to improve knowledge, but also the behaviors that influence the disease(17-18), in our study, we developed HF activities that had already been reported on as effective in other studies that involved HF patients(11). Other researchers have frequently used the following: educational meetings between patients and their caregivers(8-10), home visits(9) with the additional advantage of permitting the adaptation of education to the conditions the HF patients live in -(19) and telenursing(8). In literature, print material is evaluated as a valuable support strategy for all activities in the educational programs, helping patients to assimilate the large information volume that is being offered(9-10). In view of the results of educational interventions that included print material for patients with low reading levels, associated with improvements in self-care behaviors and the acknowledgement of signs and symptoms of worse disease conditions(20), in our study, an educational booklet was designed, for use by all stakeholders in the intervention, but mainly by patients who participated in the study and whose educational level was low. Patients and their caregivers opined that the folder was understandable, clear and pleasant to read.
In our study, we also included the family in the educational activities, as well-known literature exists that emphasizes that much of these programs' success is related with the family members' support to patients in practicing protective conducts against HF(21-22). In our data, the proportion of patients who received family support was the same in both groups, so that this variable did not produce any confusion. We did not find any difference either in the improved self-care scale score between men and women in both groups, in line with a cross-sectional study(23), but different from a research in which women showed a worse functional state, which was associated with worse self-care practices(24). This can result from the fact that, in our study, gender and functional class variables were controlled as confounding variables: the first in the stratified and multivariate analyses, and the second by using the restrictive selection criterion that participants should be classified in NYHA functional class III at most.
These study findings showed no age differences in the self-care scale score increase, in line with another study(23), but differ from a research in which age was directly associated with a greater probability of some conducts, including turning to the physician in case of health problems(13).
The logistic regression analysis showed a positive relation between educational level and the improved self-care score, in line with literature reports(13), especially concerning conducts related to adherence to the prescribed pharmacological treatment. Although some authors(7,25) showed in their studies that nursing educational interventions offer undeniable benefits to reduce the probability of readmission and death due to HF, in the present study, these differences were not found between the two groups, possibly due to the nine-month duration of follow-up, which could be considered short to assess these results.
These research results suggest that a nursing educational intervention like the one presented in this paper exerts beneficial effects on the improvement of self-care behaviors in HF patients. One limitation is that it cannot be guaranteed which of the nursing educational interventions more strongly influenced the change in self-care scale scores, which could be a theme for further research.
1. Lindenfeld J, Albert NM, Boehmer JP, Collins SP, Ezekowitz JA, Givertz MM, et al. Executive Summary: HFSA 2010 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline. J Card Fail. 2010;16(6):475-53. [ Links ]
2. Albert N. Evidence-based nursing care for patients with heart failure. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2006;17(2):170-83. [ Links ]
3. Achury D. Adherencia al tratamiento en el paciente con falla cardiaca. In: Rincón F, Díaz E, editors. Enfermería cardiovascular. Bogotá: Sociedad Colombiana de Cardiología; 2008. p. 342-68. [ Links ]
4. Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Banegas J, Guallar-Castillón P. Epidemiología de la insuficiencia cardíaca. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004;57(2):163-70. [ Links ]
5. Scott L, Setter-Kliner K, Britton A. The effects of nursing interventions to enhance mental health and quality of life among individuals with heart failure. Appl Nurs Res. 2004;17(4):248-56. [ Links ]
6. Renpenning K, Taylor S. Self-care t theory of nursing: selected papers of Dorothea Orem. New York: Springer Publisher; 2003. [ Links ]
7. Evangelista L, Doering L, Dracup K, Hamilton M. Compliance behaviors of elderly patients with advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;18(3):197-206. [ Links ]
8. Krumholz H, Amatruda J, Smith G. Randomized trial of an education and support intervention to prevent readmission of patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(1):83-9. [ Links ]
9. Jaarsma T, Huijer Abu-Saad H. Effects of education and support on self-care and resource utilization in patients with heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1999;20(9):673-82. [ Links ]
10. Harrison M, Browne G, Roberts J. Quality of life of individuals with heart failure: a randomized trial of the effectiveness of two models of hospital-to-home transition. Med Care. 2002;40(4):271-82. [ Links ]
11. Hope C, Wu J, Tu W. Association of medication adherence, knowledge, and skills with emergency department visits by adults 50 years or older with congestive heart failure. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004;61(19):2043-9. [ Links ]
12. McAlister F, S. S, Ferrua S. Multidisciplinary strategies for the management of heart failure patients at high risk for admission. A systematic review of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(4):810-9. [ Links ]
13. Artinian N, Morris M, Sloan M, Lange P. Self-care behaviors among patients with heart failure. Issues Cardiovasc Nurs Heart Lung. 2002;31(3):161-72. [ Links ]
14. Arredondo E, Rodríguez-Gázquez M. Validación de una escala de evaluación de comportamientos de autocuidado de adultos con falla cardiaca. Medellín: Facultad de Enfermería de la Universidad de Antioquia; 2009. [ Links ]
15. Baker DW, Asch SM, Keesey JW, Brown JA, Chan KS, Joyce G, et al. Differences in education, knowledge, self-management activities, and health outcomes for patients with heart failure cared for under the chronic disease model: the improving chronic illness care evaluation. J Card Fail. 2005;11(6):405-13. [ Links ]
16. Carlson B, Riegel B, Moser DK. Self-care abilities of patients with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2001;30(5):351-9. [ Links ]
17. Rankin S, Stallings K. Patient education, principles and practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001. [ Links ]
18. Pelegrino VM, Dantas RAS, Clark AM. Health-related quality of life determinants in outpatients with heart failure. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2011;19(3):451-7. [ Links ]
19. Dickson V, McMahon J. Optimal patient education and counseling. In: Moser D, Riegel B, editors. Cardiac Nursing: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 1263-82. [ Links ]
20. DeWalt D, Pignone M, Malone R. Development and pilot testing of a disease management program for low literacy patients with heart failure. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(1):78-86. [ Links ]
21. Phillips C, Wright S, Kern D, Singa R. Comprehensive discharge planning with postdischarge support for older patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;219(11):1358-67. [ Links ]
22. Doughty R, Wright S, Pearl A. Randomized, controlled trial of integrated heart failure management: the Auckland Heart Failure Management Study. Eur Heart J. 2002;23(2):139-49. [ Links ]
23. Heo S, Moser DK, Lennie TA, Riegel B, Chung ML. Gender differences in and factors related to self-care behaviors: a cross-sectional, correlational study of patients with heart failure. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(12):1807-15. [ Links ]
24. Friedman MM. Gender differences in the health related quality of life of older adults with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2003;32(5):320-7. [ Links ]
25. Rabelo ER, Aliti GB, Domingues FB, Ruschel KB, Brun AO. What to teach to patients with heart failure and why: the role of nurses in heart failure clinics. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2007;15(1):165-70. [ Links ]
María de los Ángeles Rodríguez-Gázquez
Universidad de Antioquia. Facultad de Enfermería
Calle 64, 53-09
Received: July 22th 2011
Accepted: Feb. 29th 2012
1 Supported by Facultad de Enfermería y del Comité para el Desarrollo de la Investigación (CODI), Universidad de Antioquia, Colombia.