SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue3Elastic modulus of PVDF with bentonite or LiNbO3 using deformation energyEffect of solvents on the morphology of PMMA films fabricated by spin-coating author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Polímeros

Print version ISSN 0104-1428On-line version ISSN 1678-5169

Polímeros vol.27 no.3 São Carlos July/Sept. 2017  Epub Sep 21, 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.07216 

Original Article

Sulfonation degree effect on ion-conducting SPEEK-titanium oxide membranes properties

Jacqueline Costa Marrero1  * 

Ailton de Souza Gomes1 

Wang Shu Hui2 

José Carlos Dutra Filho1 

Vivianna Silva de Oliveira3 

1Instituto de Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano – IMA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

2Departamento de Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

3Escola Técnica Rezende Rammel – ETRR, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Abstract

Polymeric membranes were developed using a SPEEK (sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)) polymer matrix, containing titanium oxide (TiO2) (incorporated by sol-gel method). SPEEK with different sulfonation degrees (SD): 63% and 50% were used. The influence of sulfonation degree on membrane properties was investigated. The thermal analysis (TGA and DTGA) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were carried out to characterize the membranes and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was carried out to evaluate the proton conductivity of the membranes. The proton conductivities in water were of 3.25 to 37.08 mS.cm-1. Experimental data of impedance spectroscopy were analyzed with equivalent circuits using the Zview software, and the results showed that, the best fitted was at 80 °C.

Keywords:  membrane; sulfonation degree; SPEEK

1. Introduction

Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are considered as the most promising fuel cell technology for a wide range of applications due to the stable operation, the high energy generation yield and the simplicity of the system[1].

The polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) has gain considerable attention due to its applications in many energy related fields such as water electrolyzers, fuel cells, battery systems, etc. The function of the membrane in PEM fuel cells is two fold: proton conduction from the anode to the cathode, and effective separation of the anode and cathode gases[2]. PEMs exhibit several advantages over liquid or solid inorganic electrolytes. The polymeric membrane should satisfy several requirements: high proton conductivity, good chemical, thermal and mechanical stability, and low permeability to reactants. Low cost and ready availability are important economical requirements. Furthermore, the membrane should work at an operative temperature around 120 °C for long time[1,3].

The poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) is one polymer with good characteristics: excellent chemical resistance, high thermo-oxidative stability and low cost[4]. Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone is obtained by sulfonation of PEEK by concentrated sulfuric acid. The SPEEK offers the advantages of lower cost, easier preparation, controllable proton conductivity and excellent chemical and thermal stability[5]. The chemical structure of PEEK and SPEEK are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Chemical structures of PEEK and SPEEK[6]

Sulfonation is a powerful method for the modification of polymers to introduce sulfonic acid functionality, which aids in the transport of protons. It makes the polymer hydrophilic and hence increases the solubility of polymers[7]. Higher sulfonation degree can enhance the density of acid sites and facilitate the proton transport. Therefore, there exists a conflict between high SD and poor mechanical strength of SPEEK membrane[8]. In order to enhance its competitive superiority in PEMFC application, varied efforts were made to modify the structure-property relationship of SPEEK. Incorporation of nanosized binary oxide materials (SiO2, TiO2, ZrO2) in SPEEK membranes has several attributes of interest, including decreased membrane swelling, reduced permeability towards methanol and improved morphological stability without compromising proton conductivity at high degree of sulfonation[9].

In this study, composite membranes using SPEEK (with different sulfonation degrees (63 and 50%)) and titanium oxide were prepared and characterized by TGA and DTGA, XRD and EIS to evaluating the influence of sulfonation degree in the structure, thermal properties and ionic conduction of the membranes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Sulfonation of PEEK

10 g of PEEK (VictrexTM USA Inc) was dissolved in 200 ml of sulfuric acid (H2SO4) (VETEC Química Fina LTDA) under nitrogen atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at 30 °C for 4 h. To follow the reaction, the mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 5 h. The sulfonation reaction was terminated by precipitating the acidic polymer solution into a large excess of ice-cold water under continuous mechanical stirring. The polymer precipitate was washed several times with deionized water until the pH was neutral. The polymer was dried under vacuum for 24 h at 70 °C. The same procedure was done with the difference that the mixture was stirred at 30 °C for 4 h and after that the mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 4 h to obtain different sulfonation degree.

2.2 Determination of the ion-exchange capacity (IEC) and SD

The IEC and SD of SPEEK was determined by titration method with NaOH solution and phenolphthalein, using the following equations:

IEC=Volume of NaOH x molar concentration of NaOHWeight of SPEEK (1)
SD=Mp x IEC1000(MSO3H x IEC) (2)

where Mp = 288 g mol-1 and MSO3H = 80 g mol-1 are the molecular weights of the monomer unit of the polymer and of a sulfonic group, respectively.

The measured IEC average value (after three measurements) for SPEEK was: 1.87 meq g−1 corresponding to an SD of 63% (SPEEK 63%) and 1.52 meq g−1 corresponding to an SD of 50% (SPEEK 50%).

2.3 Membranes preparation

Membranes were prepared using the sol-gel process. For membrane preparation, the SPEEK 63% polymer was dissolved in NMP (1-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone) (VETEC Química Fina LTDA). After complete polymer dissolution, the solution was placed to cool. After that, acetylacetone (ACAC) (Aldrich Chemical Co) and titanium oxide (4 wt%) were added to the polymer solution and was stirred for 1 h. The amount of titanium alkoxide was calculated to produced samples containing 96:4 wt% SPEEK/TiO2 rations using Titanium tetrabutoxide ((Ti(C4H9O)4) or (Ti(OBu)4)) (MERCK-Schuchardt). ACAC was used as a chelating agent to avoid precipitation of the inorganic compound. The mixtures were cast on glass plates heated to 70 °C for solvent evaporation. After casting, the membranes were stored in a vacuum oven for 72 h at 80 °C. The membranes from SPEEK 50% were prepared by the same technique described.

2.4 X-ray diffraction (XRD)

XRD patterns of dry membranes were recorded in the 2θ range 2 – 80° at a scan rate of 0.02 2θ/s with Rigaku Miniflex II X-ray diffractometer, using CuKα (λ =1.54Å) radiation.

2.5 Thermal analysis (TGA and DTGA)

Thermal gravimetric studies (TGA/DTGA) were performed in a TA TGA Q500 in the temperature range between 30 and 700 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C/min and carried out under nitrogen flow 60 mL/min.

2.6 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)

The proton conductivity of membranes was measured using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy with an Autolab PGSTAT-30 potentiostat/galvanostat instrument, in the frequency range of 1 MHz to 10 Hz and amplitude of 5 mV, using two stainless steel blocking electrodes and the contact area of 0.1 cm2. The measurements were done in the normal direction to the plane of the membranes, with samples immersed in deionized water at different temperatures (30, 50 and 80 °C).

The resistance value associated to membrane conductivity was determined from the high frequency intercept of the impedance with the real axis (Z’) and was called RS(exp.). The proton conductivity (σ) was calculated from the impedance data according to Equation 3:

σ=LRS (3)

where, σ is the proton conductivity (S.cm–1), L is the membrane thickness (cm), R is the measured membrane resistivity (Ohm) and S is the electrode area perpendicular to current flow (cm2).

Experimental data have been fitted with the Randles equivalent circuit (Figure 2) using the Zview software. In this software an equivalent circuit is assembled which generates a theoretical curve, adjusted to experimental measurements, thus, we obtain the values of the circuit elements. A Randles circuit is an equivalent electrical circuit that consists of an active electrolyte resistance RS in series with the parallel combination of the double-layer capacitance CDL and an impedance of a faradic reaction. The impedance of a faradic reaction consists of an active charge transfer resistance RCT and a specific electrochemical element of diffusion W, where ZW is the Warburg impedance (the first distributed element (DE) introduced into electrochemistry)[10].

Figure 2 The Randles equivalent circuit[10]. The Randles parameters are RS (active electrolyte resistance); CDL (double-layer capacitance); RCT (active charge transfer resistance) and ZW (Warburg impedance). 

The electrolyte resistance, the double-layer capacitance, the charge transfer resistance and the Warburg impedance were obtained by fitting the impedance spectra using the equivalent circuit and software Zview. The electrolyte resistance obtained by fitting the experimental data was called RS(sim.) and was compared with RS(exp.). When use the Circuit of Figure 2 and the software Zview to simulate the experimental impedance spectrum, appears ZW(1-R), ZW(1-T) and ZW(1-P), where 1 means the distributed element type (of 11 available) and R, T, P are free parameters which have different meanings for each DE type; in general they use the following convention: R - Usually resistance, T - A time constant or capacitance and P - an exponent[11].

3. Results and Discussions

X-ray diffraction patterns of membranes are presented in Figure 3. The membranes are fully amorphous: a broad diffraction peak at 2θ around of 20° is indicative of the lack of crystallinity. The amorphous nature of membranes indicates SPEEK with medium and high SD, in this case 63 and 50%[7]. The introduction of SO3H groups into the PEEK alters the chain conformation and packing, and thus causes loss of crystallinity. It is know that the amorphous nature of membranes imparts easier mobility of polymer chains which accounts for faster proton exchange resulting in higher proton conductivity of membranes.

Figure 3 XRD patterns of membranes: (A) SPEEK 63%-TiO2 and (B) SPEEK 50%- TiO2

The results of thermogravimetric analysis and the differential thermogravimetric analysis of prepared membranes are shown in Figure 4. The first weight loss around 100 °C can be attributed to water molecules adsorbed by hydrophilic groups and lost until the dry state of the sample is reached[9]. The second weight loss between 100 °C and 400 °C is attributed to loss of residual solvent NMP and the decomposition of the sulfonic acid groups of SPEEK. The decomposition of the polymer matrix was from 400 °C to 700 °C.

Figure 4 Thermal analysis (TGA and DTGA) of SPEEK 63%- TiO2 and SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membranes. 

The exothermic peaks, which corresponds to the water loss and the decomposition of the sulfonic groups, are more intense for SPEEK 63%- TiO2, with higher SD, because the water amount is associated to the sulfonic groups, the peak intensity increases with the increase of sulfonation degree[12].

AC impedance spectroscopy was performed to determine the conductivity of these membranes. The variation of conductivity with temperature for the different composite membranes is shown in Figure 5. The Arrhenius plots of the temperature dependency of the conductivity exhibit that the conductivity increases with temperature. Proton conductivity data for studied membranes are presented in Table 1. In the hydrated composite membranes the proton conduction is likely to happen by vehicular mechanism, rather than by Grotthuss mechanism, resulting in a long-range conductivity, with protons percolating through the sample[2].

Figure 5 Arrhenius plots for the proton conductivity of the membranes as a function of temperature. 

Table 1 Proton conductivity values of the membranes. 

Conductivity (mS.cm-1)
T (°C) SPEEK 63%-TiO2 SPEEK 50%-TiO2
30 15.55 3.25
50 23.42 4.68
80 37.08 13.14

Di Vona et al.[3] have reported the preparation of hybrid membranes based on highly sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK, SD = 0.9) where titanium oxide network was dispersed by in situ sol-gel reactions. They obtained membranes with enhanced thermal stability, reduced water uptake and good proton conductivity (σ = 58.00 mS.cm-1) up to 120 °C and concluded that the samples were suitable for application as polymeric electrolytes at intermediate temperature. Dutra et al.[13] also reported the proton-conducting of hybrid membranes consisting of SPEEK and titanium oxide, the proton conductivity in ethanol solution was of the order of 10-3 S.cm-1 when 4 or 8 wt% TiO2 were added, and generally increased with addition of TiO2. In this study, the membranes showed conductivity values in the range 3.25-37.08 mS.cm-1. A maximum conductivity of 37.08 mS.cm-1 was obtained for the SPEEK 63%- TiO2 membranes at 80 °C. For all studied temperatures, the SPEEK 63%- TiO2 membranes with SD = 63% showed higher conductivity than the SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membranes with SD = 50%, as expected. Proton transfer enhances by increasing the number of acid sites enhances the proton transfer.

The impedance characteristics of the SPEEK 63%- TiO2 and SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membranes under different operating temperatures (30, 50 and 80 °C) were also investigated. The result was plotted as a Cole-Cole plot to show the real/imaginary parts of the impedance at various frequencies.

A typical Nyquist plot of a composite membrane sandwiched stainless steel electrodes is shown in Figure 6 for SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membranes (similar result were obtained for SPEEK 63%- TiO2 membranes). The profile shows that the impedance decreases with increasing frequency. It indicates that the interfacial impedance decreases with increasing frequency, which can be attributed to double layer formation and charge transfer reaction.

Figure 6 Nyquist plots of the SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membrane for experimental impedance spectrum and simulated impedance spectrum (using the Randles equivalent circuit and the Zview software) for: (A) T = 30 °C; (B) T = 50 °C; (C) T = 80 °C. 

A simulated impedance plot for SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membranes for 30 °C, 50 °C and 80 °C is shown in Figure 6 using circuit parameters estimated from the experimental impedance plot; these circuit parameters are given in Table 2. For all membranes the electrolyte resistances decreased with increasing temperature and with SD. RS(exp.) and RS(sim.) values were too close indicating a good fit, the highest coincidence occurs for higher temperatures. The SPEEK 63%- TiO2 membrane showed lower resistivity than the SPEEK 50%- TiO2 membrane, resulting in higher conductivity.

Table 2 RS(exp.) obtained from the experimental impedance spectrum and circuit parameters used to simulated the impedance spectrum. The Randles parameters are RS(exp.) (active electrolyte resistance experimental), RS(sim.) (electrolyte resistance obtained by fitting the experimental), CDL (double-layer capacitance), RCT (active charge transfer resistance) and ZW (Warburg impedance), where ZW(1-R), ZW(1-T) and ZW(1-P) and 1 means the distributed element type (of 11 available) and R, T, P are free parameters which have different meanings for each distributed elements type; in general they use the following convention: R - Usually resistance, T - A time constant or capacitance and P - an exponent. 

SPEEK 63%-TiO2 SPEEK 50%-TiO2
T (°C) 30 50 80 30 50 80
RS(exp.) (Ω) 1.508 1.121 0.845 4.433 2.504 1.122
RS(sim.) (Ω) 1.281 1.127 0.830 4.618 2.594 1.147
CDL(µF) 1.134 2.137 8.096 1.145 4.529 5.574
RCT(Ω) 0.453 0.519 0.032 1.464 0.899 0.427
ZW(1-R) (Ω) 25.99 23.86 2.708 1770 7050 3119
ZW(1-T) (Ω) 0.061 0.063 0.075 0.416 3.598 18.28
ZW(1-P) (Ω) 0.600 0.601 0.311 0.763 0.761 0.709

The level of agreement between experiment and simulation is quite satisfactory in terms of shape and distribution of frequencies, supporting the view that circuit equivalents are a meaningful way of representing the data. The results showed the best fitted were at 80 °C (Figure 6).

4. Conclusions

Membranes based on SPEEK (with SD = 63% and 50%) and titanium oxide have been synthesized using the sol-gel process. The influence of sulfonation degree of the polymer on membrane properties was investigated. The ion exchange capacity increased with increasing of SD. The amorphous nature of composite membranes was confirmed by XRD studies. Water is coordinated to the sulfonic groups. The peak intensity which corresponds to the water loss and the loss of sulfonic groups increases with the increase of SD. For all membranes, the Rexp. and Rsim. values decreased with increasing of temperature and were too close indicating a good fit. The proton conductivity increased with increase of temperature and improves with increasing of sulfonation degree. The highest proton conductivity of 37.08 mS.cm-1 in water was obtained for the SPEEK 63%-TiO2 membrane at 80 °C. Although still not reaching very high conductivity values, the SPEEK 63%-TiO2 membranes shows the best performance in terms of thermal properties and proton conductivity, for this reason, we believe that this particular membranes have good prospects to be tested as electrolyte in PEMFC. The present investigation suggests measuring the conductivity of these composite membranes in ethanol and for higher temperatures.

5. Acknowledgements

The authors thank PNPD/CAPES for financial support granted to carry out this work.

6. References

1 Nikolic, V. M., Krkljes, A., Popovic, Z. K., Lausevic, Z. V., & Miljanic, S. S. (2007). On the use of gamma irradiation crosslinked PVA membranes in hydrogen fuel cells. Electrochemistry Communications, 11(9), 2661-2665. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2007.08.022. [ Links ]

2 Anis, A., Banthia, A. K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2008). Synthesis & characterization of PVA/STA composite polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cell application. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 17(5), 772-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11665-008-9200-1. [ Links ]

3 Di Vona, M. L., Ahmed, Z., Bellitto, S., Lenci, A., Traversa, E., & Licoccia, S. (2007). SPEEK-TiO2 nanocomposite hybrid proton conductive membranes via in situ mixed sol-gel process. Journal of Membrane Science, 296(1-2), 156-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.037. [ Links ]

4 Kawaguti, C. A., Dahmouche, K., & Gomes, A. de S. (2012). Nanostructure and properties of proton-conducting sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) and zirconia-SPEEK hybrid membranes for direct alcohol fuel cells: effect of the nature of swelling solvent and incorporation of heteropolyacid. Polymer International, 61(1), 82-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pi.3151. [ Links ]

5 Yang, T., Xu, Q., Wang, Y., Lu, B., & Zhang, P. (2008). Primary study on double-layer membranes for direct methanol fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(22), 6766-6771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.011. [ Links ]

6 Kobayashi, T., Rikukawa, M., Sanui, K., & Ogata, N. (1998). Proton Conducting Polymers Derived from Poly (ether-ether ketone) and Poly (4-phenoxybenzoyl-1,4 phenylene). Solid State Ionics, 106(3-4), 219-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(97)00512-2. [ Links ]

7 Zaidi, S. M. J. (2003). Polymer sulfonation: a versatile route to prepare proton-conducting membrane material for advanced technologies. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 28(2B), 183-194. [ Links ]

8 Hou, H., Polini, R., Di Vona, M. L., Liu, X., Sgreccia, E., Chailan, J.-F., & Knauth, P. (2013). Thermal crosslinked and nanodiamond reinforced SPEEK composite membrane for PEMFC. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38(8), 3346-3351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.019. [ Links ]

9 Di Vona, M. L., Sgreccia, E., Donnadio, A., Casciola, M., Chailan, J. F., Auer, G., & Knauth, P. (2011). Composite polymer electrolytes of sulfonated poly-ether-ether-ketone (SPEEK) with organically functionalized TiO2. Journal of Membrane Science, 369(1-2), 536-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.12.044. [ Links ]

10 Macdonald, J. R. (1987). Impedance spectroscopy-Emphasizing solid materials and systems. New York: Wiley-Interscience. [ Links ]

11 Macdonald, J. R., & Potter, L. D. Jr (1987). A flexible procedure for analyzing impedance spectroscopy results: Description and illustrations. Solid State Ionics, 23(1), 61-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2738(87)90068-3. [ Links ]

12 Carbone, A., Pedicini, R., Portale, G., Longo, A., D’Ilario, L., & Passalacqua, E. (2006). Sulphonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes for fuel cell aplication: thermal and structural characterization. Journal of Power Sources, 163(1), 18-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.066. [ Links ]

13 Dutra, J. C., Fo., Santos, T. R., & Gomes, A. S. (2014). Nanostructured Polyelectrolytes Based on SPEEK/TiO2 for Direct Ethanol Fuel Cells (DEFCs). Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia, 24, 43-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/polimeros.2014.069. [ Links ]

Received: June 06, 2016; Revised: December 01, 2016; Accepted: January 05, 2017

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.