SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue4Green polyurethane synthesis by emulsion technique: a magnetic composite for oil spill removalNew technologies from the bioworld: selection of biopolymer-producing microalgae author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Polímeros

Print version ISSN 0104-1428On-line version ISSN 1678-5169

Polímeros vol.27 no.4 São Carlos Oct./Dec. 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.2423 

Original Article

Thermal degradation of polymer systems having liquid crystalline oligoester segment

Renato Matroniani1  * 

Shu Hui Wang1 

1Departament of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Polytechnic School, Universidade de São Paulo – USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Abstract

Block copolymers and blends comprised by liquid crystalline oligoester and polystyrene were prepared and their thermal stability were characterized by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The samples have shown three main decomposition temperatures due to (1) lost of flexible chain and decomposition of mesogenic segment, (2) decomposition of polystyrene and (3) final decomposition of oligoester rigid segment. Both copolymers and polymer blends presented lower thermal stability compared to polystyrene and oligoester. The residual mass after heating at 600 °C in copolymers and polymer blends were lower than those found in the oligoesters. A degradative process of aromatic segments of oligoester induced by decomposition of polystyrene is suggested.

Keywords:  blends; liquid crystalline oligoester; thermal degradation; thermal stability

1. Introduction

The thermal behavior of liquid-crystalline polyesters (LCPs) has been subject of some papers due to their unique technological properties, such as low melting viscosity, self reinforcing mechanical properties, and high flame resistance[1-4], which is verified by extensive char formation. The improvement of the mechanical properties of commodity and engineering thermoplastics upon addition of a small amount of liquid-crystalline polyester has been reported, even in the absence of miscibility in most of those systems[5,6]. Increased compatibility in polymer blends has been reported when a flexible liquid-crystalline polyester was employed and interfacial adhesion was observed[7,8]. In recent years, block copolymers containing liquid-crystalline segments and isotropic segments have been suggested to represent the frontier in this kind of polymer blends in terms of modulation of stiffness and size domains[9,10].

Unlike LCPs, under thermal degradation conditions, most of thermoplastics and lightly crosslinked elastomers go through heat induced transformations that include hydrogen stripping, side group elimination, depolymerization to monomers and main chain rupture, followed by complete volatilization with no residue left. The influence of the presence of LCPs on the thermal degradative processes of thermoplastics is not well-known, especially in blends with isotropic-anisotropic segmented LCPs.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) can supply information on the nature of the degradative reactions, if competitive or independent, and occasionally should be an useful tool to cast some light on the interactions present in a sample.

The thermal degradative process of aromatic polyesters containing a flexible segment has been already described. The degradation proceeds by free radical mechanism after the primary breakage of the ester linkage of the terephthalic acid (Figure 1). This mechanism involves a cyclic transition state with the hydrogen at the β position, followed by a chain rupture process in which vinyl ester groups and carboxylic acids are formed[11-13] (Figure 1). A second stage was reported to be the thermal scission of the mesogenic group with phenylenic residues formation. The final degradation stage corresponds to the decomposition and volatilization of the rigid segments.

Figure 1 Initiation mechanism of terephthalic polyester decomposition containing a flexible segment[11-13]

In this paper, the thermal stability of a series of copolymers comprised by polystyrene and liquid-crystalline oligoester segments is studied. The copolymers present liquid crystalline properties and a nematic mesophase is observed by polarizing optical microscopy and thermal analysis and they are distinguished by the following general chemical structure (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Block copolymer polystyrene-b-polyester. 

The thermal degradative process of polystyrene is also previously described in many texbooks and a radical mechanism with random chain scission and chain terminal unzipping or depropagation is involved in the main process[14]. McNeill et al.[14] demonstrated by a series of degradation studies of polystyrene, that between 200 and 300 °C, the molecular weight of polystyrene is decreased without formation of volatile products, and above 300 °C, polystyrene degraded to products which can be separated into two main fractions: (1) volatile products comprising mainly monomer and small amounts of toluene and α-methylstyrene, and (2) volatile products under vacuum and degradation temperature, the so-called cold ring fraction (CRF), comprising dimer, trimer and other short chain fragments. The secondary PS macroradical was confirmed to be the main source of volatile and CRF products. After 25% volatilization, intramolecular radical transfer becomes the main reaction and the proportion of CRF products is higher.

In our study, block copolymers and polymer blends comprised by the corresponding homopolymers, polystyrene and liquid-crystalline oligoester, were submitted to thermal analysis in order to understand the whole thermal degradative process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1 Synthesis of block copolymers

Thermotropic block copolymers, poly(methyl-1,4-dioxiphenylene-4,4’-dicarbonyl-1,10-dibenzoyl-decane)-b-polystyrene, were prepared by a three step synthetic process[15-17]. In a first step a dihydroxy-terminated oligoester (sample 1, Table 1) was prepared from a polycondensation reaction of 1,10-dibenzoyl-decane-4,4’-dicarboxylic acid in the presence of a molar excess of methyl-hydroquinone. In a second step, the dihydroxy-terminated oligoester formed was further esterified with azo-ciano-pentanoyl chloride in order to produce a free radical macroinitiator. The block copolymers (samples 2-5, Table 1) were obtained in a third step by radical polymerization of styrene carried out in the presence of the macroinitiator.

Table 1 Homopolymers, copolymers and blends prepared in this work. 

Sample Type Oligoester Polystyrene
(%) (%)
1 homopolymer 100 0
2 copolymer 63 37
3 copolymer 39 61
4 copolymer 29 71
5 copolymer 16 84
6 homopolymer 0 100a
7 blend 70 30a
8 blend 50 50a
9 blend 30 70a

aComercial polystyrene PS1380 used in the blends.

2.2 Preparation of blends

Polymer blends (samples 7-9, Table 1) were prepared by dissolution of oligoester (sample 1) and polystyrene Enichem PS1380 in chloroform (sample 6), followed by coprecipitation into methanol. Precipitated mixtures were vacuum dried at room temperature for 12 hours.

2.3 Characterization

The chemical composition of the block copolymers (samples 2-5) was determined by 1H-NMR using a Varian Gemini 200 spectrometer.

The block copolymers (samples 2-5) were hydrolyzed to yield the correspondent polystyrene blocks (Table 2) by dispersing the copolymer (0.5 g) in methanol (70 ml) together with sodium hydroxide (7.0 g). The complete hydrolysis (3-4h) of the mixture was monitored by IR spectroscopy. The polystyrene residue was filtered, washed with methanol and dried.

Table 2 Average molar masses and compositions of block copolymers, homopolymers, and recovered polystyrene blocks. 

Sample Oligoester Block copolymer Polystyrene block
(%) Mw Mw/Mn Mw Mw/Mn
1 100 4500 1.61 - -
2 63 10000 1.72 8000 1.39
3 39 21000 2.22 17500 1.73
4 29 54500 1.52 28500 1.71
5 16 110500 1.48 69500 1.63
6a - - - 228000 1.47

aComercial polystyrene PS1380 used in the blends.

The molar masses of oligoester, polystyrene and block copolymers were determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) in THF, using an LC10 Perkin-Elmer liquid chromatograph equipped with a Jasco 830-RI refractive index detector and 103 Å and 104 Å Waters ultrastyragel columns. Monodisperse polystyrene standards were used for calibration.

2.4 Thermal analysis

Thermogravimetry was carried out with a Mettler TG50 thermoanalyser, under dynamic nitrogen atmosphere of 50 ml/min flow and heating rate of 10°C/min. Sample size was 10 to 15 mg.

DSC analysis were performed with a Mettler DSC-30 calorimeter under nitrogen atmosphere and heating and cooling cycles of 10 °C/min. Sample size was 10 to 20 mg and temperature range was -20°C to 250°C.

3. Results and Discussions

The relative composition of the two polymeric segments in the block copolymers was determined by 1H-NMR spectrometry (Table 2). The integration correspondent to the signal due to the benzene ortho-hydrogens, at 6.5 ppm, was used for polystyrene content determination, and the integration of the methylene oxide hydrogens signal, at 4.4 ppm, for the estimation of the oligoester.

Average molar masses of the polystyrene segments varied with the copolymer composition. Higher molar mass polystyrene observed in the block copolymers containing lower concentrations of oligoester, were due to the synthetical process adopted[16].

DSC analysis of these materials confirmed the existence of a stronger intersegmental interaction in the copolymers than in the polymer blends (Figure 3). A decrease of the Tg of the polystyrene phase in both polymeric systems, block copolymers and polymer blends, was observed and it is attributed to a partial miscibility of the oligoester in the polystyrene phase. In the block copolymers, the crystalline phase also changed. Broadening and shift of the melting (Tm) and isotropization (Ti) peaks were observed. The lowering of the isotropization temperature of oligoesters is atributted to the solvation of crystallites by polystyrene segments. The extension of the Ti variation has been shown to be dependent on the size of both polymeric segments[16]. Blends of oligoester with the commercial polystyrene did not present any shift on the melting or isotropization temperature.

Figure 3 Transition temperature, Tg and Ti, in block copolymers and polymer blends as a function of composition. Ti in polymer blend (■), Ti in block copolymer (◻), Tg in polymer blend (●) e Tg in block copolymer (○). 

These results clearly indicate an extensive miscibility in the polystyrene amorphous phase, in the block copolymer or polymer blend. However, a separated oligoester phase was still present as isotropization temperature was observed. Although constant in the polymer blends, and indicating essentially no significant intermolecular interactions, Ti in copolymers steadily decreased as the polystyrene segment length decreased from Mw=28500 g/mol to Mw= 8000 g/mol, suggesting again segmental interaction within this oligoester phase.

The oligoester, the block copolymers and the polymer blends under the conditions of the thermogravimetric analysis presented two main weight losses (Figure 4). The polystyrene presented only one sharp weight loss, primarily owing to the depropagation mechanism, as described in literature (Figure 4). The thermal decomposition of flexible thermotropic polyester based on a mesogenic triad unit with three aromatic rings has been described to occur in two fundamental steps in the path to a carbonaceous residue[17]. According to the authors[17], the first step is initiated by fragmentation of the flexible segment and vaporization of dienes, however immediately before the second step these fragments are no longer detected by mass spectroscopy and elimination of CO2 is observed after reaching 400 °C, with a second maximum rate around 460 °C, as observed for sample 1, oligoester (Figure 4).

Figure 4 TGA of the homopolymers, sample 1 (oligoester 1) and polystyrene Enichem PS1380, and blend of oligoester 1 and polystyrene. 

Table 3 presents the results of TGA as a function of copolymer composition.

Table 3 TGA of block copolymers prepared from oligoester 1. 

Sample % Td1 wt-loss-1 Td2 wt-loss-2 residue
oligoester °C % °C % %
1 100 353 62 426 23 15
2 63 352 81 402 23 0
3 39 336 68 412 32 0
4 29 338 77 419 23 0
5 16 361 100 - 0 0

Td1 temperature at the first onset;

Td2 temperature at the second onset;

wt-loss-1 weight loss in the first stage; and

wt-loss-2 weight loss in the second stage.

At the onset of the degradation, Td1, at very low weight loss, the degradation mechanism is still governed by intermolecular radical transfer. This temperature reflects the intermolecular interactions and is dependent on the molar mass of the sample.

A lowering in the thermal stability in both copolymers and polymer blends was observed, as the first weight loss derivative curve exposed a shoulder around 360°C (exemplified by sample 8, indicated in Figure 4) and a total weight loss in the first stage over 70%. The residue after heating to 600°C in copolymers and blends were also lower than that observed for the oligoester.

Such behavior suggests that a degradative process of the aromatic segments of the oligoester was induced by the radicals formed during the fast polystyrene decomposition.

The relative higher Td1 observed for sample 2 compared to other samples, copolymers and blends, is unexpected because of the higher miscibility observed in both crystalline and amorphous phases (Figure 3). For this sample, a thermal degradation due to intermolecular radical transfer seems to be limited, maybe because of its comparatively lower molar mass (Table 2).

Samples 3 and 4 with comparable polystyrene segment lengths and miscibility behaviors (Table 2 and Figure 3), were also similar in thermal induced decomposition and both degradation steps presented comparable onset temperatures. Accordingly to its low oligoester content, sample 5 showed the expected higher thermal stability compared to 3 and 4.

The dependence of the degradation temperature of polystyrene on its molar mass is well known, higher stability is expected for the higher molar mass samples. However, in the polymer blends, the molar masses of the components were kept constant and the decomposition behavior should be only ascribed to the composition of each blend.

Table 4 shows that the onset of degradation was dependent on the oligoester concentration when molar masses were kept constant. The increase in oligoester concentration decreased the thermal stability of those blends.

Table 4 TGA of blends of polystyrene 6 and oligoester 1. 

Sample % Td1 wt-loss-1 Td2 wt-loss-2 residue
oligoester °C % °C % %
6 0 372 100 - 0 0
7 70 335 71 417 16 13
8 50 349 86 415 12 2
9 30 361 84 413 13 3

Td1 temperature of first curve inflection;

Td2 temperature of the second deflection;

wt-loss-1 weight loss in the first stage; and

wt-loss-2 weight loss in the second stage.

A comparison between copolymer 4 and blend 9 shows that the same concentration of oligoester is present, however, the thermal stability of copolymer 4 was much lower. The lower thermal stability observed for copolymer should be attributed to the existence of stronger segmental interaction and lower molar mass, reinforcing a mutual degradative process.

4. Conclusions

Compared to the homopolymers, LC-oligoester and polystyrene, the block copolymers and the polymer blends having liquid crystalline segments presented a lower thermal stability. The lower thermal stability observed is attributed to the existence of an interaction between the two types of polymer chain, polystyrene and oligoester. It is suggested that in these polymer systems, under thermal induced degradative conditions, transport of radical species between phases favored the degradation propagation. The even higher instability of the copolymers compared to blends is believed to be a result of lower molar mass and stronger segmental interaction, as it was observed by DSC analysis, causing an intensified mutual polymer degradation process. However, the judicious incorporation of LCP to commodity polymers may be a potential procedure to achieve standard thermoplastics with incremented thermal resistance, as char formation is common in those systems.

5. Acknowledgements

The authors thank Brazilian CAPES and CNPq for financial support.

6. References

1 Jin, X., & Chung, T. S. (1999). Thermal decomposition behavior of main-chain thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers, vectra A-950, B-950, and Xydar SRT-900. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 73(11), 2195-2207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990912)73:11<2195::AID-APP17>3.0.CO;2-3. [ Links ]

2 Mandal, P. K., Siddhanta, S. K., & Chakraborty, D. (2011). Engineering properties of compatibilized polypropylene/liquid crystalline polymer blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 124(6), 5279-5285. [ Links ]

3 Wei, P., Wang, L., Wang, X. H., Chen, Y. W., Wang, Y. P., & Wang, Y. M. (2014). Nonisothermal and isothermal oxidative degradation behavior of thermotropic liquid crystal polyesters containing kinked bisphenol AF and bisphenol A units. High Performance Polymers, 26(8), 935-945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0954008314535645. [ Links ]

4 Chi, Z. G., Yao, X. D., Zhang, Y., & Xu, J. R. (2005). Thermal decomposition kinetics of thermotropic liquid crystalline polyesterimides. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 98(6), 2467-2472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.22447. [ Links ]

5 Mithal, A. K., Tayebi, A., & Lin, C. H. (1991). In situ composite fibers: Blends of liquid crystalline polymer and poly (ethylene terephthalate). Polymer Engineering and Science, 31(21), 1533-1538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760312105. [ Links ]

6 Mehta, S., & Deopura, D. L. (1993). Fibers from blends of PET and thermotropic liquid-crystalline polymer. Polymer Engineering and Science, 33(14), 931-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760331410. [ Links ]

7 Shin, B. Y., & Chung, I. J. (1990). Polymer blend containing a thermotropic polyester with long flexible spacer in the main chain. Polymer Engineering and Science, 30(1), 22-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760300105. [ Links ]

8 Shin, B. Y., Jang, S. H., Chung, I. J., & Kim, B. S. (1992). Mechanical-properties and morphology of polymer blends of poly(ethylene-terephthalate) and semiflexible thermotropic liquid-crystalline polyesters. Polymer Engineering and Science, 32(1), 73-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760320112. [ Links ]

9 Heitz, T., Rohrbach, P., & Höcker, H. (1989). Rigid rods with flexible side-chains - a route to molecular reinforcement. Macromolecular Chemistry and Physics, 190(12), 3295-3316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/macp.1989.021901226. [ Links ]

10 Kobayashi, T., Sato, M., Takeno, N., & Mukaida, K. (1992). Synthesis and liquid crystallinity of thermotropic polycarbonate-polystyrene graft-copolymers. European Polymer Journal, 28(9), 1105-1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-3057(92)90062-7. [ Links ]

11 Lum, R. M. (1979). Thermal-decomposition of poly(butylene terephthalate). Journal of Polymer Science. Part A, Polymer Chemistry, 17(1), 203-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pol.1979.170170120. [ Links ]

12 Foti, S., Giuffrida, M., Maravigna, P., & Montaudo, G. (1984). Direct mass-spectrometry of polymers. 11. Primary thermal fragmentation processes in aromatic aliphatic polyesters. Journal of Polymer Science. Part A, Polymer Chemistry, 22(6), 1217-1229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pol.1984.170220602. [ Links ]

13 Montaudo, G., Puglisi, C., Scamporrino, E., & Vitalini, D. (1986). Thermal degradation of aromatic-aliphatic polyethers. 1. Direct pyrolysis-mass spectrometry. Macromolecules, 19(3), 870-882. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma00157a067. [ Links ]

14 McNeill, I. C., Zulfiqar, M., & Kousar, T. (1990). A detailed investigation of the products of the thermal-degradation of polystyrene. Polymer Degradation & Stability, 28(2), 131-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-3910(90)90002-O. [ Links ]

15 Wang, S. H., Coutinho, F. M. B., Galli, G., & Chielllini, E. (1996). Copolímeros em bloco termotrópicos poliestireno – Poli(Metil-1,4-Dioxifenileno-4,4-Dicarbonil-1,10-Dibenzoil-Oxi-Decano): 1. Síntese e caracterização. Polímeros: Ciência e Tecnologia, 6(4), 38-44. [ Links ]

16 Wang, S. H., Coutinho, F. M. B., Galli, G., & Chiellini, E. (1995). Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene-polyester liquid-crystalline block-copolymers. Polymer Bulletin, 34(5-6), 531-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00423348. [ Links ]

17 Ellis, G., Marco, C., del Pino, J., & Goméz, M. A. J. (1998). Thermal stability and degradation mechanism for two main-chain liquid crystal polyesters - A TG-MS study. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 52(3), 683-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010185817984. [ Links ]

Received: December 23, 2015; Revised: April 18, 2016; Accepted: June 29, 2016

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.