Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Depression, emotional and social aspects in the abortion context: a comparison between two brazilian capitals

Abstracts

OBJECTIVE: To assess emotional and social aspects in the experience of abortion and the diagnosis of major depression, comparing women from two Brazilian cities (São Paulo - SP, Natal - RN). METHODS: A transversal study was carried out from January 2009 to May 2010, through semi-directed interviews with women undergoing an abortion (up to 22 weeks gestation) treated at university hospitals in São Paulo - SP (n = 166) and Natal - RN (n = 150). The Portuguese version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) instrument was applied for the diagnosis of depression. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p = 0.223) in the proportion of induced abortions when comparing the two capital cities: Natal (7.3%) and São Paulo (12.0%). The diagnosis of depression was high among women undergoing an abortion and was significantly higher in Natal than in São Paulo (50.7% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.01). Regarding emotional aspects, there was no difference in the occurrence of guilt feelings (Natal 27.7%; São Paulo 23.3%; p = 0.447). The partner's involvement was considered satisfactory by women in similar proportions in the two capitals (Natal 62.0%; São Paulo 59.0%, p = 0.576). No difference was found in the proportion of women who reported violence, related or not to the abortion (Natal 22.9%; São Paulo 16.6%; p = 0.378). CONCLUSION: Although there was no difference between the emotional and social aspects in the comparison between the two capitals, there was a high proportion of women with major depression, more frequent in the city of Natal than in São Paulo, which demonstrates the importance of psychosocial support in the women's healthcare system.

Abortion, induced; abortion, spontaneous; depression mental health


OBJETIVO: Avaliar aspectos emocionais e sociais na vivência do aborto e o diagnóstico de depressão maior comparando mulheres de duas capitais brasileiras (São Paulo e Natal). MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal realizado de janeiro de 2009 a maio de 2010, envolvendo a realização de entrevistas semidirigidas com mulheres em situação de abortamento (interrupção até a 22a semana de gestação) atendidas em hospitais universitários de São Paulo (n = 166) e Natal (n = 150). Para o diagnóstico de depressão, foi aplicada a versão em português do instrumento Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD). RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença significativa (p = 0,223) na proporção de abortamentos provocados: Natal (7,3%) e São Paulo (12,0%). O diagnóstico de depressão foi elevado nas mulheres em situação de abortamento, em proporção significativamente maior na cidade de Natal do que em São Paulo (50,7% contra 32,5%, respectivamente, p < 0,01). Quanto aos aspectos emocionais, não houve diferença na ocorrência de sentimentos de culpa (Natal 27,7%; São Paulo 23,3%; p = 0,447). A participação do companheiro foi satisfatória pelas mulheres em proporção semelhante nas capitais (Natal 62,0%; São Paulo 59,0%; p = 0,576). Não se constata diferença na proporção de mulheres que relatam ter sofrido violência, relacionada ou não ao aborto (Natal 22,9%; São Paulo 16,6%; p = 0,378). CONCLUSÃO: Embora não tenha sido constatada diferença entre os aspectos emocionais e sociais na comparação entre as duas capitais, verificou-se elevada proporção de mulheres com depressão maior, sendo mais frequente na cidade de Natal, o que denota a importância de suporte psicossocial nos serviços de atenção à saúde da mulher.

Aborto; depressão; saúde mental; aborto espontâneo; aborto induzido


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

IAssociate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil

IIPhD in Sciences; Psychologist, Division of Psychology, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

IIIPhD in Medical Sciences, Main Area: Ob/Gyn; Professor of the Department of Morphology and Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, RN, Brazil

IVPhD in Clinical Psychology; Professor of the Department of Psychology, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, UFRN, Natal, RN, Brazil

VPsychologist, Student of the Postgraduate Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

VIMSc in Psychology; Professor at the Department of Psychology, Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, UFRN, Natal, RN, Brazil

VIIPhD in Clinical Psychology; Director of the Psychology Division, Instituto Central, Hospital das Clínicas, FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

VIIIFull Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, FMUSP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence to

SUMMARY

OBJECTIVE: To assess emotional and social aspects in the experience of abortion and the diagnosis of major depression, comparing women from two Brazilian cities (São Paulo - SP, Natal - RN).

METHODS: A transversal study was carried out from January 2009 to May 2010, through semi-directed interviews with women undergoing an abortion (up to 22 weeks gestation) treated at university hospitals in São Paulo - SP (n = 166) and Natal - RN (n = 150). The Portuguese version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) instrument was applied for the diagnosis of depression.

RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p = 0.223) in the proportion of induced abortions when comparing the two capital cities: Natal (7.3%) and São Paulo (12.0%). The diagnosis of depression was high among women undergoing an abortion and was significantly higher in Natal than in São Paulo (50.7% vs. 32.5%, p < 0.01). Regarding emotional aspects, there was no difference in the occurrence of guilt feelings (Natal 27.7%; São Paulo 23.3%; p = 0.447). The partner's involvement was considered satisfactory by women in similar proportions in the two capitals (Natal 62.0%; São Paulo 59.0%, p = 0.576). No difference was found in the proportion of women who reported violence, related or not to the abortion (Natal 22.9%; São Paulo 16.6%; p = 0.378).

CONCLUSION: Although there was no difference between the emotional and social aspects in the comparison between the two capitals, there was a high proportion of women with major depression, more frequent in the city of Natal than in São Paulo, which demonstrates the importance of psychosocial support in the women's healthcare system.

Keywords: Abortion, induced; abortion, spontaneous; depression mental health.

INTRODUCTION

From the perspective of public health policies, the discussion of abortion is included in programs recommended for women's healthcare in the Brazilian Public Health System SUS. The subject focuses on the perspectives of gender, sexuality and access to reproductive rights. It is recognized as a public health problem, as in addition to being an important cause of maternal death, it is a difficult topic to be approached, with different implications for women's health, portrayed as the third leading cause of maternal death in our country1.

When talking about mental health associated with abortion, under any approach, there is a lot of divergence in literature2. Some studies indicate that after the abortion women are more likely to develop depression3-5 or post-traumatic stress disorder6,7, especially among those reporting physical or emotional violence, or sexual abuse victims8. Women whose first pregnancy ended in abortion have a 65% higher risk of depression than women whose first pregnancy resulted in birth4. In a study carried out in the United States, with a population in which the first pregnancy was unplanned, there was a high risk for depression in 27.3% of women who underwent abortion5. In women who became pregnant at least once before the age of 25, abortion was reported by 15% of them, and those who underwent abortions had higher rates of depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts and drug addiction9.

Other studies10-13 conclude that legalized abortion, performed in the first trimester of pregnancy, would have no consequences for mental health. Taking into consideration that most studies on abortion are carried out in southeastern Brazil (75%), with a concentration of data in the State of São Paulo (58% of publications), followed by the states of Bahia, Ceará, Pernambuco, Rio de Janeiro and Rio Grande do Sul10 and considering the need for data on the reality experienced by women in other states in the country, it is important to compare different regions. In addition, the study of two capital cities in different regions of Brazil (Southeast and Northeast) ultimately allows reflecting on the principle of equity, enabling the understanding of the existence or not of different situations, thus allowing specific interventions for specific needs.

The objective of the present study is to assess emotional and social aspects in the experience of abortion and the diagnosis of major depression in women by comparing two Brazilian capital cities (São Paulo - SP and Natal - RN).

METHODS

This study was carried out between January 2009 and May 2010 in two Brazilian cities: São Paulo (SP) and Natal (RN). The study protocol and the free and informed consent were approved by the Research Ethics Committees of both participating institutions.

The following inclusion criteria were adopted: women with a diagnosis of abortion, defined as termination of pregnancy up to 22 weeks of gestation, treated in the emergency care at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (São Paulo-SP) and Gennaro Cicco Maternity School, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (Natal - RN).

The choice of hospitals and the profile of the patients were considered through the principle of equity, using the following criteria: to be a university hospital in the capital city and provide healthcare services through the Public Health System to patients seeking emergency treatment and/or referred from other hospitals.

After the medical procedure for the treatment of abortion, women were invited to participate and to be informed about the interview procedures. Then, all volunteers signed an informed consent form.

Data were collected through previously prepared semi-structured interviews, in which the research subject was free to speak whatever she wanted in each question asked. The interviews lasted an average of one hour and were conducted by psychologists trained specifically for research purposes. The questionnaire consisted of closed questions that included demographics such as age (years), education (primary, secondary or higher), marital status (with partner or without partner), occupation (employed/unemployed or student) number of pregnancies, number of deliveries, number of abortions, history of induced abortion (yes or no), number of living children, gestational age at the current abortion (weeks), religion (Catholic, Protestant, others and non-religious) faith belief (present or absent), monthly family income (reais), number of persons per family and per capita income (reais).

Open or semi-structured questions were asked addressing the following aspects: feelings experienced at the time when the pregnancy was suspected and when it was confirmed, the existence of support by the family, friends or partner in the situation of abortion, previous occurrence of physical, sexual or emotional violence and possible association between the violence experienced and the abortion. Feelings of guilt or remorse related to abortion were also investigated. During the interview, the interviewer ensured the confidentiality of the interview and of information provided, and, under these circumstances, women were encouraged to clarify whether the abortion had been spontaneous or induced.

The Brazilian Portuguese validated version of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) instrument was applied for the diagnosis of major depression14. This instrument allows the investigation of mental disorders and consists of modules that can be assessed together or separately. In the present study, we used the module to assess mood disorders in the diagnosis of major depressive disorder9.

The PRIME-MD classification system was developed to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of mental disorders in primary care. The agreement between the PRIME-MD and the diagnosis made by independent professionals from the mental health area is excellent, with a sensitivity of 83%, specificity of 88%, positive predictive value of 80% and an overall accuracy of 88%15. Considering its usefulness and the fact that it is an easy-to-apply instrument, this system is considered an appropriate tool to evaluate the relevance of psychiatric disorders in obstetrics outpatients. Hence, this was the instrument chosen for the present research.

This instrument has also been indicated to evaluate mental disorders during pregnancy16. To analyze the feelings experienced during the abortion, reported in the semi-structured interview, the thematic or content analysis technique was used, which aims at describing, interpreting and understanding data. The technique was used to explain in an objective, systematic and quantitative way the content of the interviews. The focus was not to describe the content, but to verify what was disclosed after the data processing by coding the latter, transforming them into categories through a cross-sectional analysis. The interviews were cut around each theme-axis or interest significance unit. The units of meaning that comprise the communication of each patient were outlined and then the cuts were made to categorize the content. All results obtained with the categorization were analyzed using quantitative techniques.

The results were analyzed using the software Statistica for Windows (version 4.3, Statsoft, Inc., 1993). The variables were analyzed descriptively, by calculating means and standard deviations, absolute and relative frequencies. The quantitative and categorical data were evaluated by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, when indicated. Continuous variables were analyzed by Student's t test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 166 women were interviewed in São Paulo (SP) and 150 women in Natal (RN). Demographic characteristics and obstetric history are shown in Table 1. When comparing the two capitals, it was observed that the mean age of women who had a diagnosis of abortion was significantly younger in Natal (RN), as well as the gestational age at which abortion had occurred. There was no difference in the profile of previous obstetric history when comparing participants in the two cities. There was a significant difference regarding the proportion of women who were employed and this proportion was higher in São Paulo (SP). As for family income, both the total and the per capita amount, it was observed that the mean was higher among women interviewed in the city of São Paulo (SP). The distribution of women according to religion was significantly different when comparing the two cities, and faith belief was significantly lower among women interviewed in the city of São Paulo (SP).

The content analysis of the situations experienced by the women who had undergone abortion is shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in the proportion of induced abortions among the interviewed women when comparing the two cities. As for the reported experiences, when pregnancy was suspected, a greater proportion of women in Natal (RN) reported positive aspects, as well as the feelings experienced about the pregnancy were confirmed. There was no significant difference in the proportion of interviewed women who reported having feelings of guilt or remorse when comparing the two cities.

The account of support from family members or friends was similar when comparing the two cities, as well as the participation of the partner in the situation of abortion. There was no difference in the proportion of women who reported having experienced violence related or not to abortion, when comparing the two cities (Table 2).

Table 3 shows the results for major depression diagnosis by PRIME-MD. There was a significantly higher proportion of depression in women interviewed in Natal (RN), with differences in reports of symptoms: the women interviewed in Natal (RN) reported significantly higher proportion of sleep disorders, fatigue, appetite alterations, reduced concentration and psychomotor impairment, when compared to women interviewed in the city of São Paulo (SP).

DISCUSSION

The present study has shown that there is a high proportion of women with major depression after undergoing an abortion and this proportion is significantly higher among women interviewed in Natal (RN), when compared to those in São Paulo (SP). There have been no previous national studies comparing these national capitals and the occurrence of depression in women who underwent abortion. In this study, in cases of abortion, the proportion of women diagnosed with major depression was 32.5% in São Paulo and 50.7% in Natal (RN), which are relevant figures that demonstrate the urgency of establishing specialized support for women who experience abortion, whether spontaneous or induced, especially in the public healthcare sector.

Abortion itself interrupts a natural and socially expected biological course, regardless of the desire for pregnancy and the child, and causes the woman to come across the possibility of motherhood, arousing different feelings and fantasies. In this study, after pregnancy suspicion and confirmation, negative feelings stand out in both capital cities. At the moment of pregnancy interruption, a reassessment of the choices made (either by the pregnancy or its interruption) and the perspective of future is inevitable and confronts the woman with the prospect of emptiness (even if momentarily), loss and death.

The belief that the woman who does not bear healthy children escapes the imposed cultural standard, as society expects all women to have children, considering that biologically, women have a maternal 'function', which includes protecting, nourishing and sheltering the child. Deviations from these internal requirements trigger the guilt, as demonstrated in part by the women interviewed in this study.

The sociodemographic differences found in the two groups confirm the care complexity of the SUS patient as the National Health Program and reinforce the influence of the geographical dimension of Brazil. Although this study has found significant differences in age, gestational age at the abortion, work activity, family income, per capita income, religion and faith belief between the two groups of women, the data cover the ranges specified in other studies17.

In public services, the lack of beds in public hospitals and high demand for obstetric care often affect the quality of care provided to women undergoing abortion, which may contribute to the occurrence of depression. One expects that many of these women overcome, in time, their emotional adversites; and that the managers of the public health system guarantee conditions that allow full attention to women's health, both physically and mentally.

The importance of the study focusing on the comparison between two different capitals is due to the possibility of observing the phenomenon of abortion as a useful source of information to understand the quality of abortion care throughout the country, especially its variability by region.

The state of Rio Grande do Norte has 3,136 SUS admissions due to abortion and the state of São Paulo, 47,94218. Variations in the number of hospital admissions caused by abortion between states and regions, follow, in a certain way, the situation of income and access to health services19.

The psychological experience of women, in the situation of abortion, is not a uniform one, as it varies depending on personal characteristics, events that are associated with the pregnancy, the life circumstances and relationships at the time of abortion2. In the present study, the sociodemographic characteristics of the studied populations differ regarding maternal age, occupation, personal and family income and the distribution profiles of religion and faith belief, showing differences in life circumstances. These characteristics in the studied parameters might be related to differences in the abortion experience of women studied in the capitals, as well as the diagnosis of major depression.

In Natal, women who underwent abortion are younger, with lower family and per capita income, with a higher proportion of unemployed women. That shows a situation of greater social vulnerability, which culminates with a higher frequency of depressive symptoms. The context also shows lower religiosity among the women interviewed in São Paulo, which can be associated with a more pragmatic view of the aspects of life. In the city of Natal, women are more religious, which corroborates other studies that show a higher concentration of Catholic women in northeast Brazil1. Although not significantly different, the magnitude of the proportion of induced abortions is higher in São Paulo.

Additionally, in the city of São Paulo (SP), there was greater difficulty for women to express their wishes regarding the suspicion or confirmation of pregnancy, with unspecified feelings when confronted with the possibility of motherhood. These attitudes may be related to the lifestyle of society in large cities, where the woman's role has been redefined in contemporary times.

Abortion is associated with high rates of both positive and negative emotional reactions. However, in a study by Menezes et al.20, the negative reactions to abortion were associated with subsequent mental health disorders and mental disorder rates that were 1.4 to 1.8 times higher than among those who had not reported abortion. In the analysis of symptoms associated with major depression, this study revealed that symptoms of fatigue or loss of energy, and appetite alterations were less frequent in women from São Paulo (SP). This aspect can be related to the dynamics of life in this city, where body awareness is relatively less intense in the face of activities of individuals living in this big city. The same occurred in relation to the decreased concentration, agitation or psychomotor retardation, symptoms present in proportionately more women interviewed in Natal (RN).

In Brazil, the Law only permits abortion in a few exceptional cases: when there is no other way of saving the life of the mother and in pregnancies resulting from sexual violence. However, other reasons may lead the woman to intentionally interrupt the pregnancy. Usually, this option involves private and individual arguments, generally based on social, economic and emotional questions, but sometimes it is permeated by domestic or sexual violence21-23. This study found a significant proportion of women that reported having experienced a situation of violence, related or not to the abortion. There was no difference between the studied cities, which indicates the importance of active investigation of these aspects in our society, as violence permeates human relationships. Often health professionals can play an important role in identifying factors associated with mental health problems, so that full healthcare can be guaranteed to the women.

It is noteworthy that many studies of psychological disorders related to abortion have methodological difficulties in preparing the comparison groups, in the control of confounding variables, and evaluation of previous reproductive history. The comparison between studies has also shown to be difficult, due to sampling differences, the diversity of measures related to mental health assessment and the moments in which interviews are carried out in relation to the occurrence of abortion24.

Studies on abortion allows proposals for new public health policies, as they portray the recurring character of this phenomenon and allow the understanding of the problem as a matter of women's health, which requires special care and specific attention to minimize the physical, emotional and social complications arising from it. Although there was no difference between the emotional and social aspects in the comparison between the two capitals, there was a high proportion of women with major depression, more frequent in the city of Natal than in São Paulo. This demonstrates the importance of psychosocial support in the women's healthcare system.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Diniz D. Aborto e saúde pública no Brasil. Cad Saúde Publica. 2007;23:1992-3.
  • 2. Major B, Appelbaum M, Beckman L, Dutton MA, Russo NF, West C. Abortion and mental health: Evaluating the evidence. Am Psychol. 2009;64:863-90.
  • 3. Benute GR, Nomura RM, Pereira PP, Lucia MC, Zugaib M. Abortamento espontâneo e provocado: ansiedade, depressão e culpa. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2009;55:322-7.
  • 4. Cougle JR, Reardon DC, Coleman PK. Depression associated with abortion and childbirth: a long-term analysis of the NLSY cohort. Med Sci Monit. 2003;9:CR105-12.
  • 5. Reardon DC, Cougle JR. Depression and unintended pregnancy in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth: a cohort study. BMJ. 2002;324:151-2.
  • 6. Engelhard IM, van den Hout MA, Vlaeyen JW. The sense of coherence in early pregnancy and crisis support and posttraumatic stress after pregnancy loss: a prospective study. Behav Med. 2003;29:80-4.
  • 7. Bowles SV, Bernard RS, Epperly T, Woodward S, Ginzburg K, Folen R, et al. Traumatic stress disorders following first-trimester spontaneous abortion. J Fam Pract. 2006;55:969-73.
  • 8. Morland LA, Leskin GA, Block CR, Campbell JC, Friedman MJ. Intimate partner violence and miscarriage: examination of the role of physical and psychological abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder. J Interpers Violence. 2008;23:652-69.
  • 9. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Ridder EM. Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;47:16-24.
  • 10. Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. Psychological responses after abortion. Science. 1990;248:41-4.
  • 11. Major B, Cozzarelli C, Cooper ML, Zubek J, Richards C, Wilhite M, et al. Psychological responses of women after first-trimester abortion. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:777-84.
  • 12. Rees DI, Sabia JJ. The relationship between abortion and depression: new evidence from the fragile families and child wellbeing study. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13:CR430-6.
  • 13. Schmiege S, Russo NF. Depression and unwanted first pregnancy: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2005;331:1303.
  • 14. Fraguas R Jr, Henriques SG Jr, De Lucia MS, Iosifescu DV, Schwartz FH, Menezes PR, et al. The detection of depression in medical setting: a study with PRIME-MD. J Affect Disord. 2006;91:11-7.
  • 15. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Hornyak R, McMurray J. Validity and utility of the PRIME-MD patient health questionnaire in assessment of 3000 obstetric-gynecologic patients: the PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire Obstetrics-Gynecology Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:759-69.
  • 16. Andersson L, Sundstrom-Poromaa I, Wulff M, Astrom M, Bixo M. Neonatal outcome following maternal antenatal depression and anxiety: a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159: 872-81.
  • 17. Fonseca W, Misago C, Freitas P, Santos E, Fernandes L, Correia L. Características sócio-demográficas, reprodutivas e médicas de mulheres admitidas por aborto em hospital da Região Sul do Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 1998;14:279-86.
  • 18
    Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Data SUS; 2000. Banco de dados. Dispo nível em: http://www.datasus.gov.br
  • 19
    Rede Nacional Feminista de Saúde e Direitos Reprodutivos - Rede Saúde. Dossiê Aborto Inseguro. Disponível em: http://www.observatoriodegenero.gov.br/
  • 20. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Boden JM. Reactions to abortion and subsequent mental health. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195:420-6.
  • 21. Fisher WA, Singh SS, Shuper PA, Carey M, Otchet F, MacLean-Brine D, et al. Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion. CMAJ. 2005;172:637-41.
  • 22. Menezes GM, Aquino EM, Silva DO. Induced abortion during youth: social inequalities in the outcome of the first pregnancy. Cad Saúde Pública. 2006;22:1431-46.
  • 23. Silverman JG, Gupta J, Decker MR, Kapur N, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and unwanted pregnancy, miscarriage, induced abortion, and stillbirth among a national sample of Bangladeshi women. BJOG. 2007;114:1246-52.
  • 24. Menezes G, Aquino EM. Pesquisa sobre o aborto no Brasil: avanços e desafios para o campo da saúde coletiva. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25:S193-204.
  • Depression, emotional and social aspects in the abortion context: a comparison between two Brazilian capitals

    Roseli Mieko Yamamoto NomuraI; Gláucia Rosana Guerra BenuteII; George Dantas de AzevedoIII; Elza Maria do Socorro DutraIV; Cristina Gigliotti BorsariV; Melina Séfora Souza RebouçasVI; Mara Cristina Souza de LuciaVII; Marcelo ZugaibVIII
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      12 Jan 2012
    • Date of issue
      Dec 2011

    History

    • Accepted
      08 Aug 2011
    • Received
      27 Mar 2011
    Associação Médica Brasileira R. São Carlos do Pinhal, 324, 01333-903 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel: +55 11 3178-6800, Fax: +55 11 3178-6816 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: ramb@amb.org.br