- Citado por SciELO
- Similares en SciELO
versión impresa ISSN 0104-4230
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. vol.58 no.3 São Paulo mayo/un. 2012
Inajara RottaI; Michel Fleith OtukiII; Andréia Cristina Conegero SanchesIII; Cassyano Januário CorrerIV
IMSc in Pharmaceutical Sciences; PhD Student, Program of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil
IIPhD of Pharmacology; Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil
IIIPhD of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Professor, Universidade do Oeste do Paraná, Cascavel, PR, Brazil
IVPhD of Health Sciences; Adjunct Professor, Department of Pharmacy, UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of topical antifungal drugs applied to the treatment of each dermatomycosis.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials, published in Portuguese, Spanish and English until July 2010, which compared the use of azole and allylamine antifungal drugs among themselves and with placebo in the treatment of cutaneous candidiasis and T. versicolor, T. pedis, T. cruris and T. corporis was performed. The efficacy outcomes evaluated were mycological cure at the end of treatment and sustained cure.
RESULTS: Of the 4,424 studies initially identified, 49 met the selection criteria and were included in the meta-analyses. The grouped efficacy data evidenced the superiority of antifungal drugs compared to placebo, regardless of the dermatomycosis under evaluation, with odds ratio values ranging from 2.05 (95% CI 1.18-3.54) to 67.53 (95% CI 11.43-398.86). Allylamines were better than azoles only for the outcome sustained cure (OR 0.52 [95% CI 0.31-0.89]).
CONCLUSION: There is consistent evidence of the superiority of antifungal drugs over the use of placebo, and placebo-controlled studies are no longer justifiable. Allylamines maintain the mycological cure for longer periods compared to azole drugs. Given the significant cost difference among the classes, pharmacoeconomic analyses should be performed.
Keywords: dermatomycoses; antimycotic drugs; meta-analysis; topical administration.
Dermatomycoses are the most widespread superficial fungal infections among human beings, being an important cause for morbidity. Although they rarely present risk to the life of patients, they may result in debilitating effects, affecting their quality of life1-3.
The incidence of these diseases is increasing due to the higher number of immunocompromised patients and of recreation spaces, in which swimming pools and other fomites are shared3. The most frequent diseases are dermatophytoses or tineas (ringworms) infections resulting from fungi affecting the keratinized tissues of the skin, hair, and nails. Skin commensal yeasts, such as Malassezia furfur and Candida spp., are also important causative agents of dermatomycoses4.
The diagnosis of these diseases is based on the combination of clinical and laboratory data. Clinical diagnosis should include physical examination of lesions and epidemiological history, while mycological diagnosis is mainly based on microorganism visualization in direct microscopy and growth in culture4-6.
The treatment of these infections is different from that used in systemic infections, consisting in the primary use of antifungal topical formulations7-8, which are sold over the counter in Brazil9.
Given the shortage of systematic and quantitative review studies related to the treatment of dermatomycoses with topical antifungal drugs, and given that those already published are limited to the treatment of Tinea pedis10,11, a quantitative systematic review was performed to determine the efficacy of topical antifungal drugs in the treatment of each dermatomycosis and to establish possible differences among pharmacological classes.
SEARCH STRATEGY AND SELECTION CRITERIA
The research was conducted based on the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration for systematic reviews and meta-analyses12. A wide spectrum of strategies was used in the search for randomized clinical trials (RCT), and the descriptors were the names of azoles and allylamine antifungal drugs of interest (bifonazole, ketoconazole, clotrimazole, econazole, fenticonazole, flutrimazole, isoconazole, miconazole, naftifine, oxiconazole, sertaconazole, terbinafine, and tioconazole). The terms "vaginal", "vulvovaginal", and "oropharyngeal" were included in the search preceded by the Boolean term "NOT", and only studies that evaluated the topical use of these drugs were selected.
The search was performed in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, LILACS, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) databases, and included studies published up July 2010, in Portuguese, Spanish or English, which compared the use of topical antifungal drugs in treatment of dermatomycoses among themselves or with a placebo. Studies that did not restrict their evaluation scope to single type of dermatomycosis were excluded, including patients diagnosed with dermatophytoses or dermatomycoses in general. Furthermore, studies evaluating onychomycosis were excluded because this disease presents a very distinct pattern of treatment duration due to its chronic status.
The intervention consisted in any azole or allylamine topical antifungal drug, regardless of the dosage form, concentration, therapeutic regimen, and duration of the treatment. In each study, the clinical diagnosis for dermatomycosis should have been mycologically confirmed through the direct microscopy and/or fungal growth in culture technique.
The initial selection of studies, based on the evaluation of the title and summary, was performed by two independent proofreaders (IR and AS). Any discrepancy was resolved in a consensus meeting and, when necessary, in the presence of a third proofreader (CC).
DATA EXTRACTION AND QUALITY ASSESSMENT
The extraction of data from the selected studies was performed by the same independent proofreaders (IR and AS). The collected data consisted of patients' basic characteristics, evaluated dermatomycosis, interventions and controls, therapeutic regimen used, and efficacy data.
The efficacy results evaluated were mycological cure at the end of treatment, which included results of cure obtained at the end of the treatment, or up to seven days after its conclusion; and sustained cure, which included results of cure obtained after the treatment period, with a 14-day minimal interval without administration of the studied medications. In cases where more than one result of sustained cure was described, the one with the longest follow-up period was prioritized. For both efficacy results, the cure was confirmed through microscopy and/or culture. The clinical cure rate, due to its subjective nature, was not considered, and studies that only reported this result were excluded. Studies that only evaluated patients with T. cruris were added to those that included patients with diagnosis of T. cruris and T. corporis.
The methodological quality of each selected study was assessed through the scale of Jadad et al.13, which takes into account aspects related to the randomization, blinding, losses, and withdrawals. Only studies that presented a minimum score of 3 were included. To assess the risk of bias, a tool made available by The Cochrane Collaboration, that analyzes the study in six domains, considering the following biases: selection, performance, detection, attrition, publication bias and other sources of biases, was used12. Thus, only good quality controlled and randomized clinical trials were included in the analyses, with evidence level 1a and grade of recommendation A14.
For the efficacy results analyzed, the random effect model and inverse variance method was used to interpolate individual odds ratio (OR) results of the studies. The results were also expressed in absolute risk (AR), absolute risk reduction (ARR), and number needed to treat (NNT).
The existing heterogeneity among the selected studies was assessed through the inconsistency index (I2), provided that an amount higher than 50% is indicative of high heterogeneity. In these cases, sensitivity analyses were conducted in order to identify whether the individual characteristics of each study could have influenced the results. Therefore, each study was hypothetically removed from the meta-analysis and its influence on the global result assessed. All analyses were performed through the software Review Manager 5.V.1.
4,424 articles were retrieved, of which 4,183 were excluded after title and/or summary evaluation, and 95 after full evaluation. The main reasons that resulted in exclusion were noncompliance with the quality criteria proposed by Jadad, and the fact that many of them did not restrict their evaluation to a single type of dermatomycosis. Additionally, 97 were excluded because they were duplicated. Hence, 49 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analyses. Of these, data from 57 comparisons were extracted in a universe of 6,044 recruited patients. With respect to the basic characteristics of these patients, the weighted average age was 39.2 years, and 69.6% were male.
CRITICAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT
Only medium to high quality studies were included, pursuant to the criteria of Jadad et al.13; an average score of 3.4 was found in the studies. In most studies selected, the information available in the articles related to the method used to generate the randomization sequence and allocation concealment was insufficient. However, the basic characteristics of the patients allocated to each group were homogenous, suggesting that the attribution of moderate risk of bias for this domain did not affect the reliability of the results found.
EFFICACY RESULTS BY EVALUATED DERMATOMYCOSIS
Five studies were retrieved, which resulted in a total of 383 patients and six comparisons between topical antifungal drugs and placebo in the treatment of cutaneous candidiasis. Of these comparisons, four were established between placebo and the azoles miconazole 2%, clotrimazole 1%, econazole 1%, and bifonazole 1%, with a treatment period of 14 to 28 days. In the other two, the allylamine naftifine 1% was compared to placebo, with a 21-day treatment period.
For the outcome of mycological cure at the end of treatment, both meta-analyses results favored antifungal drugs. OR values of 10.06 (95% CI; 3.01-33.64), AR of 75%, ARR of 48%, and NNT of 2 were found in favor of the azoles and OR values of 67.53 (95% CI; 11.43-398.86), AR of 88%, ARR of 78%, and NNT of 1 favoring the allylamines when compared to placebo.
The I2 of 35% found in the comparison established between azoles and placebo indicates the existence of moderate heterogeneity among the included results, being high (I2 = 52%) between the studies selected to integrate the meta-analysis comparing allylamines and placebo. Although a high heterogeneity was found between the two included studies, they showed similar results favoring naftifine.
Only studies comparing naftifine with placebo showed results of sustained cure, and OR values of 37.14 (95% CI; 13.08-105.45), AR of 83%, ARR of 71%, and NNT of 1, favoring the use of allylamine. The heterogeneity was null among the selected studies (I2 = 0%). The follow-up period was of two weeks after the end of therapy.
Ten placebo-controlled studies, totaling 798 patients, evaluated the treatment of T. versicolor. Of these studies, data from eight comparisons established between placebo and the azoles clotrimazole 1%, bifonazole 1%, miconazole 2%, ketoconazole 2%, and econazole 1% were extracted, with a treatment period varying from two days, using the shampoo dosage form, to 28 days. Another four studies compared naftifine and terbinafibe, both at 1%, with placebo over treatment periods from seven to 28 days.
For the outcome of mycological cure at the end of treatment, the interpolation of six studies comparing azoles with placebo resulted in an OR of 20.11 (95% CI; 9.07-44.59), AR of 89%, ARR of 54%, and NNT of 2, favoring antifungal drugs. When grouping the results of three studies comparing allylamines with placebo, the OR value obtained was 2.05 (95% CI; 1.18-3.54), AR of 47%, ARR of 17%, and NNT of 6, favoring allylamines. The inconsistency index observed among the interpolated studies was null (I2 = 0%) or low (I2 = 23%).
For the outcome of sustained cure, the combined data from seven studies comparing azoles with placebo resulted in an OR of 12.61 (95% CI; 5.23-30.41), AR of 83%, ARR of 59%, and NNT of 2, favoring azoles. The value of I2 was 30% indicating moderate heterogeneity among the studies. The follow-up period was from two to six weeks after the end of the therapy. The grouping of four studies comparing allylamines with placebo showed an OR of 6.07 (95% CI; 2.19-16.86), AR of 75%, ARR of 45%, and NNT of 2, favoring allylamine drugs. High heterogeneity among the included studies was detected (I2 = 74%). However, after the hypothetical removal of the meta-analysis by Montoya35, responsible for the high heterogeneity, the amount of I2 decreased to zero and the efficacy result remained statistically favorable to allylamines. The follow-up period was from two to seven weeks after the end of the treatment.
Nineteen studies were found, in which 1,937 patients were recruited, comparing azole and allylamine antifungal drugs with placebo to treat T. pedis, being, therefore, the most evaluated dermatomycosis. Of these, seven studies compared the azoles econazole 1%, miconazole 2%, oxiconazole 1%, sertaconazole 2%, and clotrimazole 1% with placebo, with atreatment period of 28 to 42 days. The 12 remaining studies compared the allylamines naftifine 1% and terbinafine 1% and 3% with placebo, with a treatment period varying from one day, in case of film forming solution, which requires a single dose, up to 28 days.
For the outcome of mycological cure at the end of treatment, azoles and allylamines showed superiority when compared to placebo. The grouping of seven studies comparing azoles with placebo resulted in an OR of 5.54 (95% CI; 3.01-10.19), AR of 72%, ARR of 36%, and NNT of 3, with value of I2 of 71%, indicating high heterogeneity among the included studies. With the hypothetical removal of the study by Ortiz37 from the meta-analysis, the value of I2 became null and the result remained statistically favorable to azoles. When nine studies comparing allylamines with placebo were interpolated, an OR of 5.87 (95% CI; 2.46-14.01), AR of 63%, ARR of 35%, and NNT of 3 were obtained, with a value of I2 of 81%. With the hypothetical withdrawal of the studies identified as responsible for the high heterogeneity from the meta-analysis, the value of I2 decreased and the result remained favorable to allylamines.
Azoles and allylamines were also better than placebo in the outcome of sustained cure; an OR of 6.64 (95% CI; 4.65-9.48), AR of 73%, ARR of 44%, and NNT of 2 was found when four studies comparing azoles with placebo were grouped, with follow-up period of two to four weeks after the end of the therapy. When grouping 11 studies comparing allylamines with placebo, with followup period of two to 12 weeks after the end of the treatment, an OR of 14.22 (95% CI; 9.49-21.32), AR of 78%, ARR of 56%, and NNT of 2 were obtained. The inconsistency index observed among the interpolated studies was null (I2 = 0%) or low (I2 = 23%).
T. CRURIS AND T. CORPORIS
On the evaluation of the treatment of T. cruris and T. corporis, six studies were retrieved, totalling 298 patients, all comparing terbinafine 1% with placebo, with a short period of treatment, from seven to 14 days, and follow-up period from two to seven weeks after the end of the therapy.
For the outcome of mycological cure at the end of treatment, the grouping of five studies resulted in an OR of 6.40 (95% CI; 2.64-15.49), an AR of 48%, ARR of 33%, and NNT of 3. The I2 found was 6%. For the outcome sustained cure, the sum of the data from five studies resulted in an OR of 14.43 (95% CI; 7.62-27.33), AR of 85%, ARR of 58%, and NNT of 2, with a null value of I2; therefore, terbinafine was superior to placebo in both analyzed outcomes.
EFFICACY RESULTS OF AZOLES VERSUS ALLYLAMINES
Fourteen studies comparing azoles to allylamine drugs in the treatment of dermatomycoses were retreived. Of these, ten evaluated patients were diagnosed with T. pedis, two with T. versicolor, and two with T. cruris and T. corporis. Figure 1 shows the results of the meta-analyses of azoles versus allylamines for each dermatomycosis evaluated.
For the outcome of mycological cure at the end of treatment, eight studies comparing the azoles oxiconazole 1%, clotrimazole 1%, miconazole 2%, and bifonazole 1% with naftifine and terbinafine, both at 1%, in the treatment of T. pedis were grouped. The value of OR obtained was statistically favorable to the use of allylamines (0.55 [95% CI; 0.33-0.92]), with AR of 78%, ARR of 2%, and NNT of 41. The I2 value of 33% indicates moderate heterogeneity among the selected studies, validating the quality of the evidence found.
For the same outcome, when two studies comparing bifonazole and clotrimazole with terbinafine and naftifine, all at 1%, in the treatment of T. versicolor were grouped, a non-statistically significant OR value of 2.25 (95% CI; 0.09-53.79) was obtained, which was favorable to azoles, with values of AR of 93%, ARR of 19%, and NNT of 5. The value of I2 was high (68%), as the results of the studies included were contradictory. In the study by Montoya35, there was an impressive result in favor of azoles, while in the study by Aste53, no difference was detected between the classes. The sum of the results of two studies evaluating the treatment of T. cruris and T. corporis also resulted in an not statistically significant OR of 0.66 (95% CI; 0.28-1.54), however it was favorable to allylamines, with AR of 91%, ARR of 2%, NNT of 40, and I2 of 0%. The global result of the meta-analysis (0.68 [95% CI; 0.40-1.15]) did not show any difference between azoles and allylamines, not evidencing superiority of one class over the other.
For the outcome of sustained cure, the grouping of nine studies evaluating the treatment of T. pedis resulted in an OR statistically favorable to the use of allylamines (0.39 [95% CI; 0.22-0.67]), with AR of 86%, ARR of 8%, and NNT of 13, however with a high heterogeneity among the selected studies (I2 = 53%). When Ablon's study52 was hypothetically removed from the meta-analysis, the heterogeneity became moderate and the result remained favorable to allylamines.
Only one study comparing clotrimazole to naftifine in the treatment of T. versicolor was retrieved, obtaining an OR of 5.04 (95% CI; 1.46-17.37), AR of 73%, ARR of 38%, and NNT of 3, favoring the azole clotrimazole. The interpolation of two studies comparing azoles and allylamines in the treatment of T. cruris and T. corporis resulted in an OR of 0.73 (95% CI; 0.37-1.44), not showing a statistically significant difference of efficacy between the classes.
However, the result was favorable to allylamines, with AR of 86%, ARR of 4%, and NNT of 26, and I2 of 0%. The global result of the meta-analysis (0.52 [95% CI; 0.31-0.89]) presented a difference between the pharmacological classes evaluated, evidencing superiority by the allylamines compared to azoles, even with the hypothetical withdrawal of Montoya's study35, responsible for the high heterogeneity (I2 = 65%).
Dermatomycoses are the skin diseases that most commonly affect people worldwide, for which the first-line therapeutic strategy is the use of topical antifungal drugs7. While the popular use of these drugs prove their value in reducing the signs and symptoms of these infections, scientifically speaking, uncertainties with respect to the best therapy to be adopted in each case predominate, as a good part of the published clinical trials are small sized and have placebo as a comparator, and systematic review studies with meta-analysis are rare. Only two systematic reviews with meta-analyses can be found in the literature related to the treatment of dermatomycoses with topical antifungal drugs, both limited to the treatment of T. pedis10-11. In this research, all azole and allylamine antifungal drugs were compared among themselves and with placebo in the treatment of any dermatomycosis.
In this systematic review, 144 articles were fully evaluated, and 49 were selected to compose the meta-analyses. Of the 95 articles excluded, 35 failed to meet the quality criteria proposed by Jadad13, and 26 did not define a specific dermatomycosis diagnosis. In the aggregate, 6,044 patients were randomly designated to receive placebo or one of the 13 antifungal drugs, with a predominance of young males.
The meta-analyses' results demonstrate that there is consistent evidence of the superiority of topical antifungal drugs over placebo, irrespectively of the drug evaluated, pharmacological class, dosage form, concentration, therapeutic regimen adopted, duration of the treatment, diagnosed dermatomycosis, and efficacy outcome taken into consideration. These findings are consistent with those found in the systematic reviews by Crawford10 and Hart11; the superiority of all antifungal drugs compared to placebo in the treatment of T. pedis was detected.
Some meta-analyses presented high values of I2 (> 50%), indicating inconsistency in the results of the included studies. However, after some sensitivity analyses, including the hypothetical removal from the meta-analysis of the studies considered responsible for the high heterogeneity mentioned, the results remained close to the ones found prior to the removal of the studies, maintaining their statistical significance. This shows that the variation of effects in the collected data upon several primary studies did not change the final measure of effect. These findings are comparable to those found in the systematic review by Crawford10, whose meta-analyses also showed high heterogeneity among the selected studies.
Accordingly, given the strength of the evidences found, clinical trials controlled by placebo evaluating topical antifungal drugs in the treatment of dermatomycoses are no longer justifiable; only clinical trials comparing two active treatments are reccomended. Crawford et al., in 2008, published an article confirming that there is enough evidence to recommend the abandonment of trials controlled by placebo evaluating topical antifungal drugs in the treatment of T. pedis64.
With respect to the comparisons made between antifungal classes, in Crawford's study, 11 studies comparing azoles with allylamines were selected and the result found was statistically favorable to allylamines, with difference between the classes detected in the period of six weeks following the beginning of the treatment and maintained in more extensive follow-up periods10.
The same result favoring the use of allylamines was obtained in the study developed by Hart in 1999; however, a publication bias was detected. Of the 12 studies that integrated the meta-analysis, eight favored the allylamines, all published in English. The four additional studies did not show significant differences between the evaluated classes, all published in other languages11.
In this research, for the outcome of mycological cure at the end of treatment, a statistically significant difference was found between the classes, favoring allylamines only in the treatment of T. pedis, which is consistent with the findings of Hart and Crawford10-11. When the results obtained for each dermatomycosis were aggregated, no difference of efficacy between the classes was identified.
For the outcome of sustained cure, once again allylamines were better compared to azoles in the treatment of T. pedis. For the treatment of T. versicolor, the azole clotrimazole was statistically better than naftifine but this result arose from a single clinical trial. The global result of the meta-analysis was statistically favorable to allylamines, even after sensitivity analyses. This superiority of the allylamines in the general result is due to the greater emphasis on studies involving T. pedis in the total meta-analysis. With the currently available evidence, it is not possible to state the superiority of allylamines with respect to azoles for other dermatomycoses.
The impressive maintenance of the cure after the end of the therapy can be supported by the lipophilic and keratinophilic characteristics of allylamines, enabling them to remain pharmacologically active in the skin even after the suspension of the treatment. The fungicidal mechanism of action of allylamines, opposed to the fungistatic mechanism of the azole drugs, may also have contributed to better responses obtained with the usage of this class4.
Due to the difference of cost between azole and allylamine drugs, the incorporation of economic outcomes into the systematic review, such as the performance of cost-effectiveness analyses, shall define the therapeutic option that presents the best clinical results per currency unit invested, representing the most effective alternative to each clinical condition taken into consideration.
The results found show consistent evidence of the superiority of antifungal drugs with respect to placebo in the treatment of any clinical form of dermatomycosis. Through meta-analyses of direct comparisons, a difference between azoles and allylamines in the treatment of T. pedis was detected; the result was favorable to allylamines for both cure outcomes. For the outcome of sustained cure, the global result of the meta-analysis shows that allylamines are better than azoles, nevertheless, the results have a high level of evidence only for T. pedis. There are no clinical trials of good methodological quality comparing azoles and allylamines in the treatment of cutaneous candidiasis.
The authors acknowledge the support granted by the Postgraduate Program of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Paraná, PR, Brazil.
1. Borgers M, Degreef H, Cauwenbergh G. Fungal infections of the skin: infection process and antimycotic therapy. Curr Drug Targets. 2005;6(8):849 62. [ Links ]
2. Charles AJ. Superficial cutaneous fungal infections in tropical countries. Dermatol Ther. 2009;22(6):550-9. [ Links ]
3. Garber G. An overview of fungal infections. Drugs. 2001;61(Suppl 1):1-12. [ Links ]
4. Gupta AK, Einarson TR, Summerbell RC, Shear NH. An overview of topical antifungal therapy in dermatomycoses. A North American perspective. Drugs. 1998;55(5):645-74. [ Links ]
5. Hainer BL. Dermatophyte infections. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(1):101-8. [ Links ]
6. Severo LC, Londero AT. Tratado de infectologia. São Paulo: Atheneu, 2002. [ Links ]
7. Gupta AK, Cooper EA. Update in antifungal therapy of dermatophytosis. Mycopathologia. 2008;166(5-6):353-67. [ Links ]
8. Meis JF, Verweij PE. Current management of fungal infections. Drugs. 2001;61(Suppl 1):13-25. [ Links ]
9. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada (RDC) nº 138 de 29 de maio de 2003. Dispõe sobre o enquadramento na categoria de venda de medicamentos. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil. 02 jun 2003. [ Links ]
10. Crawford F, Hollis S. Topical treatments for fungal infections of the skin and nails of the foot. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007(3):1-157. [ Links ]
11. Hart R, Bell-Syer SE, Crawford F, Torgerson DJ, Young P, Russell I. Systematic review of topical treatments for fungal infections of the skin and nails of the feet. BMJ. 1999;319(7202):79-82. [ Links ]
12. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.0.2 [atualizado set. 2009]. 2011. [ Links ]
13. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17(1):1-12. [ Links ]
15. Astorga E, Cordero CN, de Espinoza ZD, Rojas RF, Zaias N, Sefton J. Naftifine cream 1% in cutaneous candidiasis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 1989;46(6):1106-1109. [ Links ]
16. Bagatell FK, Bart BJ, Cole GW, Drake LA, Ellis CN, Arbor A, et al. Naftifine gel in the treatment of tinea pedis: two double-blind, multicenter studies. Cutis. 1991;48(1):85-88. [ Links ]
17. Berman B, Ellis C, Leyden J, Lowe N, Savin R, Shupack J, et al. Efficacy of a 1-week, twice-daily regimen of terbinafine 1% cream in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis. Results of placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26(6):956-960. [ Links ]
18. Budimulja U, Bramono K, Urip KS, Basuki S, Widodo G, Rapatz G, et al. Once daily treatment with terbinafine 1% cream (Lamisil) for one week is effective in the treatment of tinea corporis and cruris. A placebo-controlled study. Mycoses. 2001;44(7-8):300-306. [ Links ]
19. Cullen SI. Cutaneous candidiasis: Treatment with miconazole nitrate. Cutis. 1977;19(1):126-129. [ Links ]
20. Cullen SI, Rex IH, Thorne EG. A comparison of a new antifungal agent, 1 percent econazole nitrate (Spectazole(registered trademark)) cream versus 1 percent clotrimazole cream in the treatment of intertriginous candidosis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 1984;35(4):606-609. [ Links ]
21. Daily AD, Kramer KJ, Rex IH, Thorne EG. Econazole nitrate (Spectazole) cream, 1 percent: a topical agent for the treatment of tinea pedis. Cutis. 1985;35(3):278-280. [ Links ]
22. Duncan WC. Tinea pedis: treatment with topical miconazole. Cutis. 1975;16(4):647-649. [ Links ]
23. Ellis CN, Gammon WR, Goldfarb MT, Griffin TB, Jegasothy BV, Kamm AR, et al. A placebo-controlled evaluation of once-daily versus twice-daily oxiconazole nitrate (1%) cream in the treatment of tinea pedis Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 1989;46(2):269-276. [ Links ]
24. Evans EGV, James IGV, Joshipura RC. Two-week treatment of tinea pedis with terbinafine (Lamisil) 1% cream: A placebo controlled study. J Dermatolog Treat. 1991;2(3):95-97. [ Links ]
25. Evans EGV, Shah JM, Joshipura RC. One-week treatment of tinea corporis and tinea cruris with terbinafine (Lamisil) 1% cream: A placebo-controlled study. J Dermatolog Treat. 1992;3(4):181-184. [ Links ]
26. Faergemann J, Hersle K, Nordin P. Pityriasis versicolor: clinical experience with Lamisil cream and Lamisil DermGel. Dermatology. 1997;194(Suppl.1):19-21. [ Links ]
27. Gentles JC, Jones GR, Roberts DT. Efficacy of miconazole in the topical treatment of tinea pedis in sportsmen. Br J Dermatol. 1975;93(1):79-84. [ Links ]
28. Greer DL, Jolly HW Jr. Treatment of tinea cruris with topical terbinafine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(4):800-804. [ Links ]
29. Hollmen KA, Kinnunen T, Kiistala U, Väänänen A, Saarelainen IO, De CC, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of terbinafine 1% emulsion gel in patients with tinea pedis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16(1):87-88. [ Links ]
30. James IG, Loria-Kanza Y, Jones TC. Short-duration topical treatment of tinea pedis using terbinafine emulsion gel: results of a dose-ranging clinical trial. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007;18(3):163-168. [ Links ]
31. Korting HC, Tietz HJ, Bräutigam M, Mayser P, Rapatz G, Paul C. One week terbinafine 1% cream (Lamisil) once daily is effective in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis: a vehicle controlled study. LAS-INT-06 Study Group. Med Mycol. 2001;39(4):335-340. [ Links ]
32. Lalosević J, Rojas R, Astorga E, Gip L. Bifonazole cream in the treatment of superficial candidosis. A double-blind comparative study. Dermatologica. 1984; 169 (sup.1): 99-106. [ Links ]
33. Lebwohl M, Elewski B, Eisen D, Savin RC. Efficacy and safety of terbinafine 1% solution in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis and tinea corporis or tinea cruris. Cutis. 2001;67(3):261-266. [ Links ]
34. Millikan LE. Efficacy and tolerability of topical terbinafine in the treatment of tinea cruris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(4):795-799. [ Links ]
35. Montoya F, Vélez H. Evaluación terapéutica de naftifine en pacientes con dermatofitosis y pitiriasis versicolor. Acta Med Colomb. 1985;10(2):79-94. [ Links ]
36. Mora RG, Greer DL. Comparative efficacy and tolerance of 1% bifonazole cream and bifonazole cream vehicle in patients with tinea versicolor. Dermatologica. 1984;169(Suppl.1):87-92. [ Links ]
37. Ortiz Lg P. Topical miconazole nitrate therapy in tinea pedis and tinea versicolor. Clin Ther. 1978;1(6):444-50. [ Links ]
38. Ortonne JP, Korting HC, Viguié-Vallanet C, Larnier C, Savaluny E. Efficacy and safety of a new single-dose terbinafine 1% formulation in patients with tinea pedis (athlete's foot): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(10):1307-1313. [ Links ]
39. Quiñones CA. Tinea versicolor: new topical treatments. Cutis. 1980;25(4):386-388. [ Links ]
40. Savin RC, Horwitz SN. Double-blind comparison of 2% ketoconazole cream and placebo in the treatment of tinea versicolor. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1986;15(3):500-503. [ Links ]
41. Savin RC. Treatment of chronic tinea pedis (athlete's foot type) with topical terbinafine. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(4):786-789. [ Links ]
42. Savin R, Eisen D, Fradin MS, Lebwohl M. Tinea versicolor treated with terbinafine 1% solution. Int J Dermatol. 1999;38(11):863-865. [ Links ]
43. Savin R, Jorizzo J. The safety and efficacy of sertaconazole nitrate cream 2% for tinea pedis. Cutis. 2006;78(4):268-274. [ Links ]
44. Segal R, Kricheli D, Zukrov B, David M. Treatment of pityriasis versicolor with bifonazole shampoo: A randomized double-blind study. J Dermatolog Treat. 1999;10(3):185-188. [ Links ]
45. Smith EB, Graham JL, Ulrich JA. Topical clotrimazole in tinea pedis. South Med J. 1977;70(1):47-48. [ Links ]
46. Smith EB, Noppakun N, Newton RC. A clinical trial of topical terbinafine (a new allylamine antifungal) in the treatment of tinea pedis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;23(4):790-794. [ Links ]
47. Syed TA, Hadi SM, Qureshi ZA, Ali SM, Ahmad SA. Butenafine 1% versus terbinafine 1% in cream for the treatment of tinea pedis. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, comparative study. Clin Drug Invest. 2000;19(6):393-397. [ Links ]
48. Van Heerden JS, Vismer HF. Tinea corporis/cruris: new treatment options. Dermatology. 1997;194(Suppl.1):14-18. [ Links ]
49. Vermeer BJ, Staats CC. The efficacy of a topical application of terbinafine 1% solution in subjects with pityriasis versicolor: a placebo-controlled study. Dermatology. 1997;194(Suppl.1):22-4. [ Links ]
50. Vicik GJ, Mendiones M, Quinones CA, Thorne EG. A new treatment for tinea versicolor using econazole nitrate 1.0 percent cream once a day. Cutis. 1984;33(6):570-571. [ Links ]
51. Zaias N, Astorga E, Cordero CN, Day RM, de Espinoza ZD, DeGryse R, et al. Naftifine cream in the treatment of cutaneous candidiasis. Cutis. 1988;42(3):238-240. [ Links ]
52. Ablon G, Rosen T, Spedale J. Comparative efficacy of naftifine, oxiconazole, and terbinafine in short-term treatment of tinea pedis. Int J Dermatol. 1996;35(8):591-3. [ Links ]
53. Aste N, Pau M, Pinna AL, Colombo MD, Biggio P. Clinical efficacy and tolerability of terbinafine in patients with pityriasis versicolor. Mycoses. 1991;34(7-8):353-7. [ Links ]
54. Bergstresser PR, Elewski B, Hanifin J, Lesher J, Savin R, Shupack J, et al. Topical terbinafine and clotrimazole in interdigital tinea pedis: a multicenter comparison of cure and relapse rates with 1- and 4-week treatment regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993;28(4):648-651. [ Links ]
55. Budimulja U. Terbinafine 1% cream vs. bifonazole 1% cream in the treatment of tinea cruris. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37(11):871-873. [ Links ]
56. Evans EG, Dodman B, Williamson DM, Brown GJ, Bowen RG. Comparison of terbinafine and clotrimazole in treating tinea pedis. BMJ. 1993;307(6905):645-7. [ Links ]
57. Irvine CA, Kenilworth NJ. Naftifine cream 1% versus clotrimazole cream 1% in the treatment of tinea pedis. Naftifine Podiatric Study Group. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1990;80(6):314-318. [ Links ]
58. Leenutaphong V, Niumpradit N, Tangwiwat S, Sritaveesuwan R, Muanprasat C. Double-blind study of the efficacy of 1 week topical terbinafine cream compared to 4 weeks miconazole cream in patients with tinea pedis. J Med Assoc Thai. 1999;82(10):1006-1010. [ Links ]
59. Millikan LE, Galen WK, Gewirtzman GB, Horwitz SN, Landow RK, Nesbitt LT Jr, et al. Naftifine cream 1% versus econazole cream 1% in the treatment of tinea cruris and tinea corporis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;18(1):52-56. [ Links ]
60. Sanchez-Carazo JL, Fuente C, Oliver V, Umbert P. A comparative study of terbinafine. Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas. 1994;85(5):388-394. [ Links ]
61. Schopf R, Hettler O, Bräutigam M, Weidinger G, Kaben U, Mayser P, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of terbinafine 1% topical solution used for 1 week compared with 4 weeks clotrimazole 1% topical solution in the treatment of interdigital tinea pedis: a randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, 8-week clinical trial. Mycoses. 1999;42(5-6):415-20. [ Links ]
62. Smith EB, Wiss K, Hanifin JM, Jordon RE, Rapini RP, Lasser AE, et al. Comparison of once and twice-daily naftifine cream regimens with twicedaily clotrimazole in the treatment of tinea pedis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1990;22(6):1116-1117. [ Links ]
63. Wahid Z, Butt J, Nishtar R. Multicentre double-blind study of efficacy and safety of terbinafine 1% cream compared with bifonazole 1% cream in patients with tinea pedis moccasin type. J Dermatolog Treat. 1997;8(4):225-227. [ Links ]
64. Crawford F, Harris R, Williams HC. Are placebo-controlled trials of creams for athletes foot still justified? Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(4):773-9. [ Links ]
Correspondence to: Submitted on: 09/22/2011
Av. Pref. Lothário Meissner, 632
80210-170 Curitiba, PR, Brazil
Approved on: 02/14/2012
Conflict of interest: None.
Submitted on: 09/22/2011