Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The National Museum's physical anthropology archive: sources on the history of eugenics in Brazil

Abstracts

The article presents a set of documental sources that are part of the physical anthropology archive administered by the National Museum's biological anthropology sector (UFRJ). The archive holds important documentation on the first Brazilian congress of eugenics, held in Rio de Janeiro in 1929, in celebration of the National Academy of Medicine centennial. In addition to the originals of papers presented at the event (some unpublished), the archive also contains a series of documents compiled by the congress organizers, including announcements of the event, attendee registrations, correspondence, newspaper and magazine clippings of articles on eugenics, as well as motions, reports, and final minutes, all of which makes this collection invaluable in understanding the history of eugenics in Brazil.

First Brazilian Congress on Eugenics; history of eugenics; Physical Anthropology Archive (National Museum/UFRJ); Brazil


Apresenta um conjunto de fontes documentais que integram o Arquivo de Antropologia Física, de responsabilidade do Setor de Antropologia Biológica do Museu Nacional/UFRJ. O arquivo contém importante documentação sobre o Primeiro Congresso Brasileiro de Eugenia, realizado em 1929, no Rio de Janeiro, em comemoração ao centenário da Academia Nacional de Medicina. Além de originais dos trabalhos apresentados no evento - alguns inéditos -, constam também nesse arquivo documentos reunidos pela secretaria do Congresso, como convocações para a sua realização, ficha dos inscritos, correspondências, recortes de jornais e revistas com artigos sobre eugenia, bem como moções, relatórios e atas finais, constituindo acervo fundamental para a compreensão da história da eugenia no Brasil.

Primeiro Congresso Brasileiro de Eugenia (1929); história da eugenia; Arquivo de Antropologia Física do Museu Nacional; Brasil


SOURCES

The National Museum's physical anthropology archive: sources on the history of eugenics in Brazil

Vanderlei Sebastião de SouzaI; Ricardo Ventura SantosII; Mônica Costa S. CoelhoIII; Ozana HanneschIV; Claudia Rodrigues-CarvalhoV

IDoctoral candidate in the History of the Sciences and Health Graduate Program, COC/Fiocruz. Rua Cardeal Leme, 125/S402 - 20240-012 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil. vanderleidesouza@yahoo.com.brIIAssociate professor, Department of Anthropology, Museu Nacional/ UFRJ; Researcher, Ensp/Fiocruz. Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480 - 210410-210 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil. santos@ensp.fiocruz.brIIIMuseologist, Department of Anthropology, Museu Nacional/UFRJ. Quinta da Boa Vista, s/n - 20940-004 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil. monica@mn.ufrj.brIVConservator-restorer, Coordination of Documentation and Archives/ Mast. Rua General Bruce, 586 - 20921-030 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil. ozana@mast.brVAssociate professor, Department of Anthropology, Museu Nacional/UFRJ. Quinta da Boa Vista, s/n - 20940-004 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil. claudia@mn.ufrj.br

ABSTRACT

The article presents a set of documental sources that are part of the physical anthropology archive administered by the National Museum's biological anthropology sector (UFRJ). The archive holds important documentation on the First Brazilian Congress of Eugenics, held in Rio de Janeiro in 1929, in celebration of the National Academy of Medicine centennial. In addition to the originals of papers presented at the event (some unpublished), the archive also contains a series of documents compiled by the congress organizers, including announcements of the event, attendee registrations, correspondence, newspaper and magazine clippings of articles on eugenics, as well as motions, reports, and final minutes, all of which makes this collection invaluable in understanding the history of eugenics in Brazil.

Keywords: First Brazilian Congress on Eugenics; history of eugenics; Physical Anthropology Archive (National Museum/UFRJ); Brazil.

In the mid-1980s, studies on eugenics became quite common in international historiography. Until that time, eugenics had been seen as a pseudoscience and as knowledge grounded in a biased, nonobjective point of view, and some historians thought the history of eugenics had little to tell us about early twentieth century society, politics, and science. This perspective saw proponents of eugenics as no more than a group of reactionary, racist intellectuals and politicians, with strong ties to Nazi fascism and Aryanism (Adams, 1990, p.220). Yet when the field of historiography returned to studies on the meanings of eugenic ideas, it showed that eugenics was not something detached from the new rational order of civilization; to the contrary, it was the "legitimate offspring of the modern spirit, of that urge to assist and speed up the progress of mankind toward perfection that was throughout the most prominent hallmark of the modern age" (Bauman, 1999, p.33).

At the same time, although eugenics was a commonplace in Western thought, historians have pointed out that the field cannot be understood as a homogenous, unified scientific branch of knowledge, defined by shared interests and goals. Recent studies on the history of eugenics, conducted in countries like Germany, the United States, England, France, Russia, and Brazil, have identified a diversity of ideas and of implemented eugenic policies. The historian Mark Adams (1990, p.226) has brought home the fact that eugenics was a movement of ideas which reconfigured itself according to different national contexts, shaped by the cultural traditions specific to each region.

Spurred by these discussions, the history of eugenics in Brazil has become a recurrent theme in recent historiography, particularly as of the 1990s, when historian Nancy Stepan (1991) published The hour of eugenics: race, gender and nation in Latin America, an important work on the history of eugenics in Latin America, with a focus on the issues addressed by eugenicists in Brazil, Argentina, and Mexico. The book's recent translation into Portuguese (Stepan, 2005) has further fostered both the debate itself as well as historical studies on eugenics in Brazil, especially during the between-war period, when Brazil's eugenics movement gained followers and was institutionalized.

Overall, there is a relatively ample supply of documental sources pertinent to the study of eugenics in Brazil, and the researcher can locate books, newspaper articles, magazines, and periodicals on the topic, albeit these are scattered about. Some of the most valuable documents for reconstructing this chapter of Brazilian history warrant special mention: Annaes de Eugenia, published in 1919, which is a collection of papers edited by the São Paulo Eugenics Society (Sociedade Eugênica de São Paulo); Actas e trabalhos do Primeiro Congresso Brasileiro de Eugenia, a 1929 publication containing some of the papers discussed at this event; and Boletim de Eugenia, a periodical that circulated from 1929 to 1933. Despite the large number of existing documents, the material is spread across the country in different archives and libraries, and in many cases is rare and in need of conservation.

In 2006, the Biological Anthropology Sector of the Anthropology Department at the National Museum (Museu Nacional), which is attached to the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro), made available to the public the Physical Anthropology Archives (Arquivo de Antropologia Física) (Santos, Mello e Silva, 2006). The archives hold a series of documents related to eugenics in Brazil, along with material written by eugenicists from other countries. The bulk consists of documentation gathered together for the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress (Primeiro Congresso Brasileiro de Eugenia), held in Rio de Janeiro in 1929. All records produced by the Congress were entrusted to the National Museum, whose then-director, anthropologist Edgard Roquette-Pinto, presided over the event. In addition to part of the originals of papers presented at the event (some unpublished), the archives also hold a series of documents compiled by the Congress secretariat, such as announcements of the event, registration forms, names of those registered, correspondence of participants, motions, reports, and final minutes. These sources are invaluable to our understanding of the history of eugenics in Brazil, since the event was a landmark in the eugenics movement.

It must of course be said that the material on eugenics accounts for only some of the documents in the custody of the Physical Anthropology Archives, which encompasses over ten thousand records vital to our knowledge of the history of anthropology (particularly physical anthropology) in Brazil from the nineteenth century through the 1960s. The archives also include a variety of documents on related areas, like social anthropology, ethnology, and archeology. It comprises textual documents like clippings from newspapers and scientific magazines or journals, correspondence, administrative documents, and a gamut of scientific texts, as well as iconographic and cartographic documents like photographs, maps, posters, and drawings. It is all organized in series and subseries, which relies on some of the nomenclature from the archives' original folder tabs and divisions. Under a technical cooperation agreement between the Museum of Astronomy and Related Sciences (Museu de Astronomia e Ciências Afins, known by the acronym Mast) and the National Museum, staff members from both institutions are assessing each record's state of conservation, and material from the archives is then duly preserved and housed. This work is being carried out at Mast's Laboratory for the Conservation and Restoration of Paper (Laboratório de Conservação e Restauração de Papel, or Lapel), with guidance from a specialist from the National Museum's Biological Anthropology Sector. These records are available for consultation, with access restricted in the case of those in a poor state of conservation or awaiting restoration.

Although the entire archival collection at the Physical Anthropology Archives is of note, here we highlight only those holdings related to the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress, along with other records directly pertinent to the issue at hand. This material merits a more thoroughgoing description, considering the importance of the Congress both for the eugenics movement and for Brazil's intellectual history. Some of the topics on the agenda of this scientific event had significant impact throughout the 1930s; the discussions on immigration, for example, formed a reference point for a broad debate on immigration policies under the 1934 Constitution (Geraldo, 2007).

Eugenics in Brazil in the early decades of the twentieth century

Discussions of eugenics in Brazil date to the post-World War I period, a time of major changes on the national scene. The turn of the 1910s to the 1920s was marked not only by a process of urbanization and industrialization and the arrival of new immigrants but likewise by an expansion of nationalism and a feeling that Brazil's modernization would depend upon broad social reforms, particularly in public health, education, and the racial make-up of Brazilian society (Skidmore, 1976; Schwarcz, 1993; Carrara, 1996; Stepan, 2004). Nourished by these ideals, the country's intellectual and political elite sought to build a new identity for Brazilian man, transforming the figure of the lazy, sickly 'Jeca' portrayed by writer Monteiro Lobato into a valiant, hard-working 'Jeca' (Lima, Hochman, 1996; Lima, 1999). So when eugenic ideas were introduced to Brazil in the early twentieth century, their proponents quickly adopted this reformist vision, acclaiming how eugenics would contribute to the regeneration of the Brazilian population.

In the literature of the day, the term 'eugenics' always appeared as a symbol of cultural modernity and was understood as scientific knowledge that expressed much of what was most up-to-date in modern science. Speaking about eugenics was an allusion to evolution, progress, and civilization, terms that were part of the nationalist imaginary shared by a good slice of the Brazilian elites. Eugenics was often interpreted as "mankind's new religion" or as "the science of the future", which would be responsible for the physical and mental regeneration of the Brazilian population (Souza, 2006, p.19). As Nancy Stepan (1991, p.40) has argued, the very history of eugenics in Brazil should be seen as an "endorsement of science" that had become the "rallying cry for the modern, secular elite". According to this author, in the early decades of the twentieth century, Brazil's intellectuals embraced science, especially medicine and eugenics, as a progressive form of knowledge that made it possible to contemplate an alternative to Brazil's 'backwardness'.

Unlike the model of eugenics developed especially in the United States and Germany, where scientific racism had gained firm footing, Brazilian eugenics was characterized by a 'gentler' discourse, informed by neo-Lamarckian conceptions and by a belief in the heritability of acquired characters (Stepan, 2004, 2005). Although the ideas defended by some members of the eugenics movement extended to more radical measures associated with 'negative eugenics', most Brazilian eugenicists were concerned about regenerating the country's population through social reforms, be it through urban and rural sanitation, combating the country's principal diseases, expanding mother-infant care, or promoting hygiene and sex education (Marques, 1994; Stepan, 2004; Souza, 2006).

Eugenic ideas were further shaped by the country's racial reality, since the large population of African, indigenous, or mestizo origin was seen as a problem that needed to be addressed by Brazilian authorities. By and large, Brazilian eugenicists sought an alternative path that would steer clear of the negative, deterministic stereotype of alleged racial instability in Brazil, as constructed by foreign scientists and travelers. By controlling immigration policy and the process of miscegenation, Brazilian eugenicists hoped to homogenize the 'national race' through a process of 'whitening' - an option that Brazil's elites had found attractive since the nineteenth century - or by recognizing a mestizo identity, as advocated by a group of intellectuals led by Roquette-Pinto, Gilberto Freyre, and Manoel Bomfim. As historiography has made clear, rearticulations concerning the concept of race and racial classifications dominated Brazilian social thought during this period, heavily characterized by ambivalence between acceptance and rejection of scientific racism (Skidmore, 1976; Schwarcz, 1993; Maio, Santos, 1996; Cunha, 2002; Carrara, 2004).

The First Brazilian Eugenics Congress

Reaching Brazil in the late 1920s thanks to persistent propaganda by a group of physicians and eugenicists, led chiefly by Renato Kehl, eugenicist ideas managed to win over a good number of the country's intellectuals, scientists, and political authorities. Proponents and sympathizers could be found at a number of scientific institutions, where they exalted the reformative capacity of "Galton's new science", which, they contended, could not only advance the process of regenerating and shaping nationality but likewise accelerate the modernization of Brazilian science. It should be pointed out that the São Paulo Eugenics Society, Pro-Sanitation League of Brazil (Liga Pró-Saneamento do Brasil), and Brazilian Mental Hygiene League (Liga Brasileira de Higiene Mental), were not alone in promoting eugenic ideas; other associations, academies, and medical magazines also embraced these within their scientific programs. Furthermore, in January 1929, Renato Kehl founded the Boletim de Eugenia with the purpose of bringing knowledge of eugenics to the broader population (Souza, 2006, p.131-132).

In tune with this growth of the eugenics movement, the National Academy of Medicine - then headed by Miguel Couto - began announcing the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress as an integral part of the centennial celebration of the institution's founding in 1829. The fact that the Academy, as one of Brazil's top medical institutions of the day, would publicize the Congress contributed to reaffirming interest in and solidifying eugenics as one of the central themes addressed by Brazilian intellectuals and, moreover, to defining the new directions the eugenics movement was to take in the 1930s.

Held at Rio de Janeiro's School of Medicine (Faculdade de Medicina do Rio de Janeiro) in July 1929, the Congress was attended by over one hundred intellectuals, including delegates from other South American countries. Among those present were physicians, educators, jurists, anthropologists, sociologists, and historians, including key early twentieth-century intellectual leaders like Miguel Couto, Roquette-Pinto, Belisário Penna, Affonso de Taunay, Alfredo Ellis, Azevedo Amaral, Renato Kehl, and Leonídio Ribeiro, to name only a few. At various thematic sessions, attendees hotly debated topics related to "the nation's eugenic future", like immigration selection, marriage controls, sex education, mother and infant care, the eugenic sterilization of the 'mad' and the 'criminal', genetics and heritability, biometrics, racial anthropology, psychiatry and mental hygiene, and education and hygiene in general.

Over 75 papers were presented, discussed, and, in some cases, voted on, resulting in the event's main conclusions. Only a share of these were published, in what now stands as a singular, critical document for the history of eugenics: Actas e trabalhos do Primeiro Congresso Brasileiro de Eugenia (Actas e trabalhos..., 1929). In addition to the final minutes and the five conferences held during the event, the volume also offers another twenty papers on eugenics and related themes. In its closing pages, the text indicates that another two volumes of presented papers were to be published, but this never came about.

In an especially noteworthy article published in Actas e trabalhos - "Nota sobre os tipos antropológicos do Brasil" (Note on the anthropological types of Brazil) - author Edgard Roquette-Pinto broadly defends Brazilian miscegenation, arguing that none of Brazil's "racial types" display any stigma of degeneration of racial inferiority. Owing to the impact of Roquette-Pinto's arguments and to his scientific weight in the field of physical anthropology (Santos, 1998; 2002), this text became a major reference during the period; in fact, in the preface to Casa-Grande & Senzala (The masters and the slaves), Gilberto Freyre cited it as one of the works that made a crucial contribution to his understanding that Brazilian miscegenation was eugenically viable. The volume also includes important papers by Renato Kehl, Fróes da Fonseca, Azevedo Amaral, Levi Carneiro, André Dreyfus, and others as well.

The original copies of many of these papers, along with unpublished ones, belong to the repository of the National Museum's Physical Anthropology Archives. One of these, to take an example, was among those that fueled the most heated controversy during the Congress: "O problema eugênico da imigração" (The eugenic issue of immigration), by Azevedo Amaral, an intellectual who would become one of the foremost figures in Brazilian political thought during the Vargas government. The arguments espoused by this author generated a rift among congress participants, primarily over the immigration model that should be adopted by the Brazilian government. Grounded in presuppositions that reaffirmed racial inequality, Azevedo Amaral made the case that the eugenic selection of immigrants should be based on hereditary and racial qualities, measured first and foremost by the "characters of intelligence and character", and not merely on their state of health. In his view, desirable immigrants, likely to display a "sound heritage", would come from northern Europe, like Germanic Aryans. Although Azevedo Amaral found a good number of allies to support his thesis - including Renato Kehl, Miguel Couto, and Xavier de Oliveira - other attendees, like Roquette-Pinto, Belisário Penna, Fróes da Fonseca, and Fernando Magalhães, maintained that the immigrants recruited into the project to settle Brazil should not be selected according to their racial characters but rather to their state of health, physical vigor, and their interest in assimilation into Brazilian society.

The collection provides access to conferences given during the Congress as well, in the form of typed texts with handwritten corrections and notes by their authors. Renato Kehl's conference "A eugenia no Brasil" (Eugenics in Brazil) offers a historical and bibliographic outline of eugenics in Brazil, with information of value to an understanding of the Brazilian eugenics movement. It is worth noting that the original is longer than the version published in Actas e trabalhos. The latter, for example, does not include a lengthy excerpt in which Renato Kehl harshly criticized the "ineptness" and "immorality" of Brazil's political elite, who he felt would be unable to advance the idea of the population's eugenic regeneration. Kehl also believed that this same elite needed to be eugenized itself; he disagreed, for instance, with Oliveira Vianna, who thought Brazil's elites represented the best "eugenic types". There is no way we can know for certain but it is likely that these paragraphs were omitted from the published paper for two main reasons: first, because they were not to the liking of many Congress attendees, who were members of Brazil's political elite; second, because copies of Actas e trabalhos were to be distributed to the country's paramount political figures, including the Office of the President and both the lower and upper houses.

Another quite polemic conference was given by André Dreyfus. In "O estado atual do problema da hereditariedade" (The current status of the problem of heritability), Dreyfus stressed the importance of Mendelian genetics to understanding heritability and the phenomena studied by the biological sciences, while he contested neo-Lamarckian arguments about the role of the environment in heritability. This discussion also split those in attendance since many were fervent advocates of neo-Lamarckism. The best example of this schism can be found in the conference by physician Levi Carneiro, "Educação e eugenia" (Education and eugenics), in which he contended that, progress in heritability research notwithstanding, it was unthinkable that the environment, education, and other social laws not be considered essential to the racial improvement of mankind. In the eye of this author - as of many Brazilian eugenicists - social laws, hygiene, and education had much to contribute to regenerative eugenic practices, by transforming "softened" men into "tenacious, intrepid" men, "ugly" into "sturdy", "uncultured" into "wise and intelligent".

Based on the neo-Lamarckian presupposition that improving the environment would lead to the perfecting of future generations, a portion of the eugenicists who attended the Congress understood that hygienization and education in turn meant eugenization. At the same time, it should be remembered that these eugenicists were influenced by a strong tradition of medical climatology, which had been infecting Brazilian medical thought since the nineteenth century (Edler, 1999). According to Maio (2004), there were close ties between First Republic sanitarian ideas and nineteenth-century medical environmentalist thought, especially from a neo-Hippocratic and a-racialist perspective. Furthermore, in the early decades of the twentieth century, sanitary and social issues were of greatest concern to physicians, hygienists, and eugenicists. They felt that combating "dysgenic environments", encouraging the spread of hygienic habits, and employing sanitary prophylaxis measures would be the fastest, most efficient way of regenerating the population.

At least four of the original Congress texts remain unpublished. One is a manuscript entitled "Eugenia" (Eugenics), whose author could not be identified. Nor is anything known about its origin or even whether it constituted one of the documents gathered by the Congress secretariat. With references to Francis Galton and other European eugenicists, the text endeavors to define eugenics, its function, and its foundations. According to this text, "eugenics is the science of good biological inheritance, or the hygiene of hereditary tendencies", and its bases were linked to hygiene in general and to genetics. It ends by defending the association between eugenics and hygiene (especially sanitation), public health, sexual morality, body hygiene, and education as eugenic measures essential to the physical and mental regeneration of man. As mentioned earlier, this link between eugenics and hygiene, or eugenics and education, synthesized the viewpoint of many Brazilian eugenicists, although others (like Renato Kehl, Roquette-Pinto, Octávio Domingues, and André Dreyfus), refuted neo-Lamarckism, favoring Mendelian genetics instead.

The tie between eugenics and hygiene appears as well in two other unpublished papers found in the Physical Anthropology Archives. One was presented by Maria Antonieta de Castro, who was among the few women at the Congress. Her text, entitled "A influência da educação sanitária na redução da mortalidade infantil" (The influence of sanitary education on the reduction of infant mortality), focuses on initiatives taken by the São Paulo State Inspectorship of Sanitary Education (Inspetoria de Educação Sanitária do Estado de São Paulo) in the area of mother and infant health. Using graphs of statistical data, the author underscores how childcare, prenatal hygiene, and maternal education programs were essential to producing healthy offspring. Along with these graphs and other illustrations, the paper has over forty photographs related to services provided by the Inspectorship, such as the Prenatal Hygiene Service (Serviço de Hygiene Pré-natal); the Mothers Course (Curso das Mãezinhas), focused on maternal education; and contests of sound infant health and the Eugenic Baby, which selected the healthiest, most eugenically beautiful babies.

Another unpublished paper was by Mendes de Castro, assistant physician at the São Paulo Inspectorship of Sanitary Education and Health Centers (Inspetoria de Educação Sanitária e Centros de Saúde de São Paulo). Entitled "A luta contra a sífilis e moléstias venéreas em São Paulo" (The fight against syphilis and venereal diseases in São Paulo), the article talks about state-provided medical services to combat syphilis and other venereal diseases. Mendes de Castro emphasized the eugenic importance of sex education and treatment for the "sick" who had been struck by "venereal evils", which he deemed responsible for the rapid degeneration of the "race". Attachments to the paper include instructional pamphlets, photographs from the Syphilography and Venereal Diseases Service (Serviço de Sifilografia e Moléstias Venéreas), and numerous graphs and tables with information on venereal disease indicators and treatment in the state of São Paulo.

Leonídio Ribeiro's "A idade e o casamento" (Age and marriage) is another unpublished article available at the Physical Anthropology Archives. The author stresses how "early marriage" could damage the "future of the race". While allowing that the development of sexual functions may vary in accordance with race, climate, and environment, Leonídio Ribeiro maintains that in physical and biological terms - especially as far as reproductive organs - newlyweds are only "biologically ready for procreation" at the age of 18. Well received by those in attendance, the text was one of a set of papers on selection in marriage and eugenics, a widely discussed topic during the six-day event. Other texts on this theme can be found in the Physical Anthropology Archives, such as Jorge de Lima's "Tese de eugenia" (The eugenics thesis), Newton Belleza's paper on marriage and consanguinity, and the conclusions of Joaquim Moreira da Fonseca's work on marriage, chastity, and eugenics.

The following is a complete, alphabetical list of papers available at the Physical Anthropology Archives which were presented at the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress, all in the form of typed originals:

- "A eugenia no Brasil" (Eugenics in Brazil), by Renato Kehl;

- "A idade e o casamento" (Age and marriage), by Leonídio Ribeiro (not published in Actas e trabalhos);

- "A influência da educação sanitária na redução da mortalidade infantil" (The influence of sanitary education on the reduction of infant mortality), by Maria Antonieta de Castro (not published in Actas e trabalhos);

- "A luta contra a sífilis e moléstias venéreas em São Paulo" (The fight against syphilis and venereal diseases in São Paulo), by Mendes de Castro (not published in Actas e trabalhos);

- "Estatística de doenças mentais do Hospital do Juquery" (Statistics on mental diseases at the Juquery Hospital), by Pacheco e Silva;

- "Biométrica" (Biometrics), by Fernando Rodrigues da Silveira;

- "Casamento e eugenia" (Marriage and eugenics), by Joaquim Moreira da Fonseca;

- "Consanguinidade" (Consanguinity), by Newton Belleza;

- "Considerações em torno do índice rádio-pélvico de Lapicque e tíbio-pélvico de Fróes da Fonseca" (Considerations on Lapicque's radial-pelvic index and Fróes da Fonseca's tibial-pelvic index), by Ermírio Lima;

- "Contribuição ao estudo dos psychogramas (psicologia individual)" (Contribution to the study of psychograms [individual psychology]), by Ubirajara da Rocha and Arauld Bretãs;

- "Da aplasia clavicular" (On clavicular aplasia), by Benjamin Vinelli Baptista;

- "Educação e eugenia" (Education and eugenics), by Levi Carneiro;

- "Estado atual dos grupos hemáticos" (Current status of sanguineous groups), by Roberto Hinrickesen;

- "Estatística dos tarados no Brasil" (Statistics on the morally degenerate in Brazil), by Bulhões de Carvalho;

- "Fatores de degeneração observado nas praças da polícia militar" (Degeneration factors observed among military soldiers), by Motta Rezende;

- "Genética vegetal" (Plant genetics), by A.J. de Sampaio;

- "Herencia psíquica intra-uterina" (Intra-uterine psychic inheritance), by Waldemar Coutts;

- "Maternidade consciente" (Conscious maternity), by Castro Barreto;

- "O dispensário psíquico como elemento da educação eugênica" (The psychic dispensary as an element of eugenic education), by Gustavo Riedel;

- "O estado atual do problema da hereditariedade" (The current status of the problem of heritability), by André Dreyfus;

- "O problema eugênico da imigração" (The eugenic issue of immigration), by Azevedo Amaral;

- "These de eugenia" (The eugenics thesis), by Jorge de Lima.

The Physical Anthropology Archives' collection of archival sources directly related to eugenics includes the following as well:

- Documents of the secretariat of the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress, including correspondence, regulations, by-laws, congress program, list of submitted and presented papers, registration forms, list of those registered, and publicity material about the event;

- Documents with abstracts and conclusions of papers, motions, reports, and minutes on the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress, with information pertinent to an understanding of the debates between congress participants;

- Clippings from newspapers and scientific magazines, with articles by Brazilian, German, French, British, and Spanish authors on eugenics, heritability, miscegenation, and related themes;

- Other texts on eugenics, like Renato Kehl's "A eugenia prática" (Practical eugenics), published in Folha Médica in 1929;

- The first three issues of the Boletim de Eugenia, published in January, February, and March 1929.

In conclusion, despite growing production on the history of eugenics in Brazil, nothing specific has yet been written about the First Brazilian Eugenics Congress, though many authors have underscored the role played by this event in the trajectory of Brazil's eugenics movement (Marques, 1994; Cunha, 2002; Boarini, 2003; Stepan, 2004; 2005; Souza, 2006). The documentation that has recently become available through the Inventory of the Physical Anthropology Archives thus stands as an invitation to those interested in the study of the early twentieth-century history of eugenics in Brazil and related topics.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Maria Celina Soares de Mello e Silva, of Mast, and all the interns and contracted staff who helped to organize and conserve the archives. We likewise extend our gratitude to CNPq (project 400.581/03-05) for financing the technical diagnosis, cleaning, and housing of records in the custody of the Physical Anthropology Archives.

REFERENCES

  • ACTAS E TRABALHOS... Actas e trabalhos do Primeiro Congresso Brasileiro de Eugenia. Rio de Janeiro: s.n. 1929.
  • ADAMS, Mark B. Toward a comparative history of eugenics. In: Adams, Mark (Org.). The wellborn science: eugenics in Germany, France, Brazil e Russia. New York: Oxford University Press. p.217-231. 1990.
  • BAUMAN, Zigmunt. Modernidade e ambivalência Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar. 1999.
  • BOARINI, Maria Lucia (Org). Higiene e raça como projetos: higienismo e eugenismo no Brasil. Maringá: Eduem. 2003.
  • CARRARA, Sérgio. Estratégias anticoloniais: sífilis, raça e identidade nacional no Brasil do entre-guerras. In: Hochman, Gilberto; Armus, Diego (Org.). Cuidar, controlar, curar: ensaios históricos sobre saúde e doença na América Latina e Caribe. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. p.428-453. 2004.
  • CARRARA, Sérgio. Tributo a Vênus: a luta contra a sífilis no Brasil, na passagem do século aos anos 40. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. 1996.
  • CUNHA, Olívia Maria Gomes da. Intenção e gesto: pessoa, cor e a produção cotidiana da (in)diferença no Rio de Janeiro, 1927-1942. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional. 2002.
  • EDLER, Flávio. A constituição da medicina tropical no Brasil oitocentista: da climatologia à parasitologia médica. Tese (Doutorado) - Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. 1999.
  • GERALDO, Endrica. O 'perigo alienígena': política imigratória e pensamento racial no Governo Vargas (1930-1945). Tese (Doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas. 2007.
  • LIMA, Nísia Trindade. Um sertão chamado Brasil: intelectuais e representação geográfica da identidade nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Revan. 1999.
  • LIMA, Nísia Trindade; HOCHMAN, Gilberto. Condenado pela raça, absolvido pela medicina: o Brasil descoberto pelo movimento sanitarista da Primeira República. In: Maio, Marcos Chor; Santos, Ricardo Ventura (Org.). Raça, ciência e sociedade Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. p.23-40. 1996.
  • MAIO, Marcos Chor. Raça, doença e saúde pública no Brasil: um debate sobre o pensamento higienista do século XIX". In: Monteiro, Simone; Sansone, Livio (Org.). Etnicidade na América: um debate sobre raça, saúde e direitos reprodutivos. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. p.15-44. 2004.
  • MAIO, Marcos Chor; SANTOS, Ricardo Ventura (Org.). Raça, ciência e sociedade Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. 1996.
  • MARQUES, Vera Regina Beltrão. A medicalização da raça: médicos, educadores e discurso eugênico. Campinas: Unicamp. 1994.
  • SANTOS, Ricardo Ventura. Mestiçagem, degeneração e a viabilidade de uma nação: debates em antropologia física no Brasil (1870-1930). In: Penna, Sérgio D.J. (Org.). Homo brasilis: aspectos genéticos, linguísticos, históricos e socioantropológicos da formação do povo brasileiro. São Paulo: Funpec. p.113-129. 2002.
  • SANTOS, Ricardo Ventura. A obra de Euclides da Cunha e os debates sobre mestiçagem no Brasil no início do século XX: os sertões e a medicina-antropologia do Museu Nacional. História, Ciências, Saúde - Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, v.5, supl., p.237-253. 1998.
  • SANTOS, Ricardo Ventura; MELLO E SILVA, Maria Celina Soares de. Inventário analítico do Arquivo de Antropologia Física do Museu Nacional Rio de Janeiro: Museu Nacional/ UFRJ. (Série Livros, 14). 2006.
  • SCHWARCZ, Lilia Moritz. O espetáculo das raças: cientistas, instituições e questão racial no Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras. 1993.
  • SKIDMORE, Thomas. Preto no branco: raça e nacionalidade no pensamento brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra. 1976.
  • SOUZA, Vanderlei Sebastião de. A política biológica como projeto: a 'eugenia negativa' e a construção da nacionalidade na trajetória de Renato Kehl (1917-1932). Dissertação (Mestrado) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em História das Ciências e da Saúde, Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro. 2006.
  • STEPAN, Nancy. 'A hora da eugenia': raça, gênero e nação na América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. 2005.
  • STEPAN, Nancy. A eugenia no Brasil - 1917 a 1940. In: Hochman, Gilberto; Armus, Diego (Org.). Cuidar, controlar, curar: ensaios históricos sobre saúde e doença na América Latina e Caribe. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz. p.331-391. 2004.
  • STEPAN, Nancy. 'The hour of eugenics': race, gender and nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1991.
  • Arquivo de Antropologia Física do Museu Nacional: fontes para a história da eugenia no Brasil

    Vanderlei Sebastião de SouzaI; Ricardo Ventura SantosII; Mônica Costa S. CoelhoIII; Ozana HanneschIV; Claudia Rodrigues-CarvalhoV
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      05 Oct 2009
    • Date of issue
      Sept 2009
    Casa de Oswaldo Cruz, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Av. Brasil, 4365, 21040-900 , Tel: +55 (21) 3865-2208/2195/2196 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
    E-mail: hscience@fiocruz.br