SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 issue1Study on 15 cases of white piedra in Grande Vitória (Espírito Santo - Brazil) over a five-year periodAlopecia areata: a revision and update author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

On-line version ISSN 1806-4841

An. Bras. Dermatol. vol.80 no.1 Rio de Janeiro Jan./Feb. 2005

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962005000100008 

CASE REPORT

 

Subcutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Veronaea bothryosa: report of 2 cases*

 

 

Roberto Rheingantz da Cunha FilhoI; Joel SchwartzII; Mariane RehnIII; Gerson VettoratoIV; Maria Aparecida de ResendeV

IPreparing a Master's Degree in Health and Behavioral Sciences, UCPel (RS), Dermatologist (SC), former resident of the Dermatology Service/UFRGS, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre Hospital Complex (RS)
IIAdjunct Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Dermatology Service/UFRGS, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre Hospital Complex (RS)
IIIM.D. in residence, Dermatology Service/UFRGS, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre Hospital Complex (RS)
IVMycologist, Dermatology Service/UFRGS, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre Hospital Complex (RS)
VPh.D. in Microbiology from USP (SP), Professor, Microbiology Department, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Minas Gerais State (MG)

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Veronaea bothryosa is very rare. We report two cases. To our knowledge, these are the first and second cases to be reported on the American continent, and fourth and fifth cases in the world literature. We report one case in a kidney transplant recipient, and another case in an immunosuppressed non-transplant patient. Both patients presented with a lesion on the dorsal aspect of the foot, following trauma. One patient responded moderately well to treatment with itraconazole. The other responded well to a surgical excision.

Keywords: Surgery; Dermatomycoses; Mitosporic fungi; Immunosuppression; Opportunistic infections; Itraconazole; Male; Mycoses; Kidney transplantation.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Phaeohyphomycosis is a disease caused by dematiaceous fungi characterized by hyphae and pigmented fungal cells in the infected tissue. These fungi live like saprophytes in soil, vegetation and water.1,2 The group's main clinical importance is due to a growing incidence and severity of the infection, which may lead to death. Immunosuppression of diverse causes seems to have a strong influence on the problem's pathophysiology. Dermatology has a fundamental role to play, given that one of the most affected sites is the skin.

Two cases of phaeohyphomycosis caused by Veronaea bothryosa are reported in this study. They were both immunosuppressed under different conditions. The former occurred in a renal transplant recipient utilizing immunosuppressor drugs. The latter patient had a chronic obstructive lung disease and was under non controlled corticotherapy.

 

CASE REPORTS

Case 1
A 44-year-old white male patient from Arroio do Sal, a coastal town in Rio Grande do Sul state, had a kidney transplant carried out five years ago. He was treated with immunosuppressor drugs (cyclosporine, azathioprine and prednisone). The patient reported a trauma on the left foot from a wooden splinter, which occurred three years prior to the consultation, although the lesion developed only three months ago. The patient also referred to an attempt at removing the lesions, as he believed it to be a wart.

The dermatological examination revealed a lesion that was painful to touch. It had an erythematous-violet color and a tumoral aspect with a central cavity and slight exudation (Figure 1). The anatomic and morphologic examination showed chronic dermatitis with structures pigmented by hematoxylin-eosin. Grocott-Gomori methenamine staining demonstrated that there were fungal elements (Figure 2). The direct (KOH) examination revealed dematiaceous hyphae (Figure 3). The urease test was positive. In the Sabouraud dextrose agar culture, there was quick growth of the raised colony, which went from grey to black, was velvety and characteristic of the dematiaceous filamentous fungus (Figure 4). The microscopy was typical of Veronaea bothryosa (Figure 5).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Therapy was begun with terbinafine 250 mg daily for 28 days. There was no response during this period, and new lesions emerged in the pretibial homolateral region, which suggests increasing dissemination along the path of the lymphatic vessels (Figure 1). New therapies were introduced with itraconazole 200 mg daily. There was then a significant reduction of pain, lesion size and exudation in the 25 and 40-day follow-up sessions. On the other hand, new lesion material collection resulted in positive direct mycological examinations and cultures. The new approach involved tapering the dose of the immunosuppressor drugs as suggested by the hospital transplant center. Itraconazole was kept at the same doses for roughly 10 months. In spite of there not being a reduction of lesions with this new approach, there was no complete clinically remission. The disease activity was confirmed by positive mycologic examinations. The patient died at the end of this period due to complications arising from an accidental cerebral vascular hemorrhage. The serology for HIV I and II was negative. The fasting glycemia, hematocrit, hemoglobin and leukocytes were normal.

Case 2
A white 64-year-old patient from the mountainous region of Rio Grande do Sul state, presented with an asymptomatic lesion on the dorsal aspect of the right foot, resulting from a trauma from a corn husk. Two years ago, the patient utilized 40 mg of prednisone daily with the objective of alleviating chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), without clinical follow up. The physical examination revealed cushingoid facies and edema of the lower limbs. The dermatological examination identified a small erythematous-violet papule (Figure 6).

 

 

Direct examination of the lesion (KOH) showed dematiaceous hyphae. There was rapid growth of dark-grey colonization, with a velvety surface in the middle of the culture as well as a dematiaceous filamentous fungus (Figure 4). The microscopy was characteristic of Veronaea bothryosa (Figure 5).

The anatomopathologic examination revealed dermatitis with spongiosis foci and dematiaceous fungal structures. A large excision was performed. There was no recurrence up to the present moment (with 13 months of follow up). The patient was referred to the Pneumology Sector in order to manage his lung disease adequately. The serology for HIV I and II was negative. The fasting glycemia, hematocrit, hemoglobin and leukocyte count was normal. The chest X-ray showed significant COPD.

 

DISCUSSION

The agents responsible for phaeohyphomycosis include a large number of genera and different species. In accordance with the literature, Exophiala and Alternaria are possibly the most relevant of the opportunist pathogens.1-4 Infection by Veronaea bothryosa is extremely rare. There have been merely three cases reported in the international literature, oddly in countries as distant from one another as China, Libya and France. The first case of phaeohyphomycosis caused by this fungus was reported by Nishimura, in China, but does not feature patient data or disease presentation. 5 The second case described in the literature refers to an apparently healthy woman from Libya, who presented with cutaneous lesions and oral ulcers (letter from Ayadi, The Lancet, 1995). The latest case described involves a hepatic transplant recipient in France, from 1996.6 Recently, Polish researchers found this fungus in the water and snow in coniferous trees. 7

The present report is the first of its kind on the American continent. In it, we consider two patients, the fourth and fifth cases described in the international literature on phaeohyphomycosis caused by Veronaea bothryosa. One of the patients was a kidney transplant recipient, while the other patient was non-transplant immunocompromised.

The real prevalence of phaeohyphomycosis is not known. Apparently it is most frequent in immunosuppressed patients. Patients submitted to corticotherapy8 iatrogenic Cushing's syndrome and diabetes mellitus,9 transplants treated with immunosuppressor drugs,6 patients with severe diseases (tuberculosis in elderly patients),3 cwith pemphigus and corticoid-induced diabetes,10 in chemotherapy due to malignant diseases of the lymphohematopoietic system,11 premature infants12 and in infants receiving intralesional (intra-articular) corticotherapy at the lesion site.4 Meanwhile, cases do exist in clinically healthy persons who are not under medication.13

A diagnosis of phaeohyphomycosis is based on the mycological examination, given that the clinical presentation might be variable and the anatomopathological examination might be non-specific. In spite of this, histopathology might help to identify inflammatory alterations and dematiaceous fungal elements, thereby indicating a deep mycosis caused by a pigment-producing fungus. The round forms might be seen either in chromoblastomycosis or in the phaeohyphomycosis caused by opportunist pathogens. This is why the direct mycologic examination and culture microscopy are necessary for the diagnosis of the etiologic agent, especially in verrucous lesions. In the phaeohyphomycosis, direct mycologic examination allows dematiaceous hyphae to be visual observed, which is not possible in chromoblastomycosis, which only identifies round bodies.1,2

The culture microscopy was quite characteristic in both cases. It allowed a definitive diagnosis of infection by Veronaea bothryosa to be established. This is a dematiaceous fungus with erect conidiophores. It is seldom ramified and has smooth walls. The conids present as cylindrical, varying from 5-to-12 per 3-to-4 micra with round apexes. They virtually always have a septum (Figure 5). This set of morphological findings is distinct of the species.1,2

A background of trauma is not always present in cases of phaeohyphomycosis. There is some debate as to whether the fungi are latent in the host or whether there is lesion development only with reduced immunity. The disease course is frequently slow in immunocompetent patients. On the other hand, dissemination occurs not infrequently by the internal organs, while recurrence does occur in immunocompromised patients.

Currently there is no standard treatment for this type of infection. In turn, it poses a great therapeutic challenge. The best option is for empirical treatment by observing prior reports. Therefore, any previously utilized treatments will have to have their effectiveness studied. The present authors would like to recall that terbinafine was not effective in its first case. There was moderate response to itraconazole 200 mg daily (namely, there was a clinical reduction, but without total remission of the lesions and the mycological culture remained positive). Terbinafine has been utilized,14 but the drug to be most employed remains itraconazole in doses of 200 and 400 mg daily.4,13,15 A description does exist of amphotericin by itraconazole.11 Excision is an accepted method, whether in association with antifungal drugs or not.4,8,15

Further studies must be prompted so as to obtain more reliable epidemiologic data and more effective therapy despite all the difficulties involved in treating rare diseases. Physicians must be alert to the first signs of this type of infection, given that the transplant recipient and immunosuppressed population have significantly increased in size. Prompt diagnosis and treatment might reduce morbidity, as well as increase the probabilities of a cure and better control of the disease. q

 

REFERENCES

1. Hoog GS, Guarro J, Figueras MJ, editores. Atlas of clinical fungi. 2nd ed. Spain: CBS; 1995.         [ Links ]

2. Lacaz CS, Porto E, Hiens-Vaccari EM, Melo NT. Fungos, actinimicetos e algas de interesse médico. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1998.         [ Links ]

3. Kim HU, Kang SH, Matsumoto TM. Subcutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala jeanselmei in a patient with advanced tuberculosis. Br J Dermatol. 1998;138 :351-3.         [ Links ]

4. Woollons A, Darley CR, Pandian S, Arnstein P, Blackee J, Paul J. Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala dermatidis following intra-articular steroid injection. Br J Dermatol. 1996;135:475-7.         [ Links ]

5. Nishimura K, Miyaji M, Taguchi H, Wang DL, Li RY, Meng ZH. An ecological study on pathogenic dematiaceous fungi in China. Proceedings of the 4nd International Symposium of Research Center of Pathogenic Fungi. Tokyo; 1989. p.17-20.         [ Links ]

6. Foulet F, Duvoux C, de Bièvre C, Hézode C, Bretagne. Subcutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis caused by Veronaea bothryosa in a liver transplant recipient successfully treated with itraconazole. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29:689-90.         [ Links ]

7. Czeczuga B, Orlowska M. Hyphomycetes in the ice of water reservoirs. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 1999;44:64-75.         [ Links ]

8. Faulk CT, Lesher JL. Phaeohyphomycosis and Mycobacterium fortuitum abscesses in a patient receiving corticosteroids for sarcoidosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33: 309-11.         [ Links ]

9. Hsu MML, Lee JYY. Cutaneous and subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exserohilum rostratum. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993:28:340-4.         [ Links ]

10. Romano C, Fimiani M, Pellegrino M, Valenti L, Casini L, Miracco C, et al. Cutaneous Phaeohyphomycosis due to Alternaria Tenuissima. Mycoses. 1996;39:211-5.         [ Links ]

11. O'Quinn POR, Hoffmann JL, Boyd AS. Colletrichum species as emerging opportunistic fungal pathogens: a report of 3 cases of Phaeohyphomycosis and review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;45:56-61.         [ Links ]

12. Bryan MG, Elston DM, Hivnor C, Honl BA. Phaeohyphomycosis in premature infant. Cutis. 2000;65:137-40.         [ Links ]

13. Hirsh AH, Schiff TA. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by an unusual pathogen: Phoma species. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34: 679-80.         [ Links ]

14. Perez A. Terbinafine: broad new spectrum of indications in several subcutaneous and systemic and parasitic diseases. Mycoses. 1999;42:111-34.         [ Links ]

15. Restrepo A. Treatment of tropical mycosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;31:91S-102S.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to
Roberto Rheingantz da Cunha Filho
Rua Joinville, 255/402 Bairro Vila Nova
Blumenau SC 89035-200
Tel/Fax: (47) 340-2694
E-mail: dermatorheingantz@hotmail.com

Received on May 08,2003.
Approved by the Consultive Council and accepted for publication on November 01,2004.

 

 

* Study carried out at the Dermatology Service/UFRGS, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre Hospital Complex (RS).