SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.85 issue5Dermoscopic clues to distinguish trichotillomania from patchy alopecia areataCase for diagnosis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

Print version ISSN 0365-0596

An. Bras. Dermatol. vol.85 no.5 Rio de Janeiro Sept./Oct. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962010000500023 

IMAGES IN TROPICAL DERMATOLOGY

 

Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis*

 

 

Rosane Orofino Costa

PhD, Adjunct Professor of Dermatology, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Head of the Mycology Laboratory, Pedro Ernesto Teaching Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Mailing address

 

 


ABSTRACT

This report shows images of a case of subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis caused by Exophiala jeanselmei in a patient who has undergone renal transplantation. The paper comments briefly on the disease and emphasizes the need to take this mycosis into account in the differential diagnosis of other dermatoses, including non-infectious dermatoses.

Keywords: Exophiala; Kidney transplant; Mycoses


 

 

Phaeohyphomycosis was a nomenclature proposed by Ajello in 19751 and later modified by McGinnis in 19832. The term phaeohyphomycosis defines the diseases caused by fungi growing in the infected tissue as irregular septate brownish hyphae and/or toruloid hyphae, as well as fungal elements with germination (Figure 1). The term should not substitute well-established diseases such as tinea nigra, black piedra or chromomycosis.3 Cases most often present as cutaneous, subcutaneous or systemic skin abscesses and may affect immunologically competent or incompetent individuals. The most common form of presentation is the subcutaneous type, which should form part of the differential diagnosis of several dermatoses including tumoral forms. In the case presented here, the lesion resembles a mycetoma or epidermoid carcinoma (Figure 2). The most common etiological agents are the Exophiala species (Figure 3). 4 Due to the diversity of the etiological agents, hosts and forms of clinical presentation, treatment remains difficult. When the lesion is subcutaneous and well localized, complete surgical removal of the lesion is recommended (Figure 4). If necessary, broad-spectrum antifungal medication may be used, although care must be taken with immunodepressed patients in the case of possible side effects and drug interactions. 5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

1. Ajello L. Phaeohyphomycosis: definition and etiology. In: International Conference on the Mycoses. Proceedings, Washington: PAHO, Scient Publ, 1975, 304. p.126-30.         [ Links ]

2. McGinnis MR. Chromoblastomycosis and phaeohyphomycosis: new concepts, diagnosis and mycology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1983;8:1-16.         [ Links ]

3. Matsumoto T, Ajello L. Agents of Phaeohyphomycosis. In: Ajello L, Hay RJ, editors. Medical Mycology. Londres: Arnold; 1998. p. 503-24.         [ Links ]

4. Lacaz CS, Porto E, Martins JEC, Heins-Vaccari EM, Melo NT. Feo-hifomicose. In: Lacaz CS. Tratado de Micologia Médica. São Paulo: Sarvier; 2002. p. 520-61.         [ Links ]

5. Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE. Phaeohyphomycosis. In: Kwon-Chung KJ, Bennett JE. Medical Mycology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1992. p.620-77.         [ Links ]

 

 

Mailing address:
Rosane Orofino
Av. 28 de Setembro, 87 - 2º andar Vila Isabel
20551 030 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil
Phone/Fax: +55 21 2587 6622 +55 21 3325 7456
E-mail: micologia@uerj.br

Approved by the Editorial Board and accepted for publication on18.08.2010.
Conflict of interest: None
Financial funding: None

 

 

* Study conducted at Department of Dermatology, Pedro Ernesto Teaching Hospital, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.