SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.86 issue6Knowledge, attitudes and practices about sun exposure and photoprotection in outpatients attending dermatology clinics at four hospitals in Lima, PeruNew aspects in the clinical course of pityriasis versicolor author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia

Print version ISSN 0365-0596

An. Bras. Dermatol. vol.86 no.6 Rio de Janeiro Nov./Dec. 2011

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0365-05962011000600010 

INVESTIGATION

 

Intense pulsed light in photoaging: a clinical, histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation*

 

 

Régia Celli Ribeiro PatriotaI; Consuelo Junqueira RodriguesII; Luiz Carlos CucéIII

IM.Sc., School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (USP). Assistant Physician, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (USP) - Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIAssociate Professor, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (USP). Biomechanics Laboratory (LIM 41) - Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIIProfessor Emeritus, Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (FMSP) - Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil.

Mailing address

 

 


ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intense pulsed light has been used in the treatment of photoaging without a full understanding of its mechanism of action.
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of intense pulsed light on photoaging and on the skin immune response by means of a clinical and histopathological study, evaluating Langerhans cells (CD1), expression of intercellular adhesion molecule, of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes and quantification of collagen and elastic fibers.
METHODS: In 2006 a total of 26 patients, aged 40 to 65 years, with phototypes II to III (Fitzpatrick scale), were treated for photoaging using intense pulsed light in five sessions with a monthly interval. All the patients were subjected to histological and immunohistochemical evaluation 6 months after treatment.
RESULTS: At the end of the treatment clinical improvement was observed in 76.92% of cases. This improvement was associated to a significant increase of collagen (51.33%) and elastic (44.13%) fibers. Intense pulsed light treatment led to a reduction of CD4 lymphocytes and did not alter the amount of CD8 lymphocytes. It also led to a significant increase of small, nonectatic blood vessels, positive intercellular adhesion molecule.
CONCLUSION: Facial treatment with intense pulsed light promoted major clinical improvement that was confirmed by histological examination of the skin. This technique is a good treatment option for skin photoaging because it is non-ablative, safe and effective.

Keywords: Collagen; Elastic tissue; Lasers; Skin aging; Rejuvenation


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Intrinsic or chronological aging is genetically determined, and extrinsic aging, also called photoaging, occurs by exposure to ultraviolet radiation. 1 With regard to the histological phenomena of aging, there are differences between intrinsic and extrinsic aging. In extrinsic aging, the epidermis shows hyperkeratosis, melanocytes are more numerous and there is flattening of the dermoepidermal junction. In the dermis, there is a wide band of eosinophilic material, called Grenz zone, an accumulation of elastic fibers, forming amorphous masses (elastotic material), fibroblasts are reduced in number and collagen fibers are thin.2

Although Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), developed by Goldberg, is not a laser, it is a non-coherent light that covers a large wavelength to be absorbed by the desired chromophore, as it directs a specific light beam to the target, through the use of cutting filters, exposure time of the light pulses and interval between them. 3

Non-ablative photorejuvenation with IPL works by causing reversible thermal damage to collagen due to light penetration into the dermis and direct heating of these structures, sparing the epidermis. Therefore, contraction of collagen fibers and fiber remodeling are achieved after the inflammatory period.

 

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study group consisted of 26 women, aged 40 to 65 years (mean age 51.7 years). The patients had skin phototypes II and III (Fitzpatrick Scale) and showed skin photoaging of the face, grade III (Glogau scale).4.5 Procedures were initiated after a detailed explanation of the research study and after the patients signed the free and informed consent. Exclusion criteria included patients previously submitted to any cosmetic procedure in the face, including treatment with IPL or Laser, tanned skin and/or phototypes V and VI (Fitzpatrick Scale), those with diseases aggravated by light, patients taking photosensitizing drugs, patients with a history of keloid or hypertrophic scarring, inability to use sun protection during treatment, active skin diseases in the face or refusal to sign the consent form. 4

In this study patients underwent facial treatment with IPL and we conducted a pre- and post-treatment histopathological evaluation. For this, the following routines were adopted: 1 - thirty days before the start of IPL therapy, all the patients prepared their facial skin with retinoic acid 0.025% combined with hydroquinone 4% at night; 2 - after the start of treatment, patients were instructed to only use SPF 30 sunscreen on the face during the day and avoid direct sunlight; 3 - patients underwent photographic documentation of their face before and 6 months after initiation of treatment in three different positions: anterior, right and left lateral; 4 - skin biopsies were performed before and after treatment; 5 - facial treatment with 5 IPL sessions; 6 - histopathological study of the biopsies.

Skin biopsies were performed in the right preauricular region in an area affected by photoaging, using disposable "punch" no 4 after infiltrative anesthesia with lidocaine 2% without vasoconstrictor. The suture was made with mononylon 6.0 and removed at day 5.

The patients were submitted to five sessions, with a monthly interval, with ILP equipment, Record 618, Israel. This equipment has broadband technolo-gy-GEM (Geometrical Energy Management), emits light at wavelengths between 420 and 1100 nm, pulse duration of 10 ms, single pulse, energy between 10 and 22 J/cm 2, program from 0 to 12 and air cooling. It has a tip of 1.5 x 5.0 cm. In this study we chose an energy of 20 J/cm2 (program 10) for all the patients, which is the most suitable for phototypes II and III (Fitzpatrick Scale). A cooled transparent gel was used, forming a thin layer on the skin for better coupling of the tip to the skin and also to protect the epidermis.

At each session, IPL was applied to the entire face. Discharges were made adjacent to each other, and three applications were done. In the nasolabial fold region, glabellar region, perioral and periorbicular regions, two subsequent discharges were made. Protective goggles were used by patients and by the researcher during the procedure. For relief of redness and burning due to the procedure, patients were instructed to use cold compresses.

The evaluation of side effects (erythema, edema, burning and crusting) was conducted immediately after the completion of each session and in every return visit.

Clinical evaluation consisted of analysis of clinical photographs before and after treatment of each patient by three specialists in dermatology. Improvement was classified as slight, moderate and great in relation to texture, skin lightning and improvement of fine wrinkles of the face.

The patients were evaluated in relation to the degree of satisfaction with scores ranging from 0 to 10.

Histopathological evaluation was performed by histomorphometry with the aid of a Kontron 300 (Zeiss) image analyzer. Skin biopsies were immersed in 10% formalin solution in a phosphate buffer for 24 hours and were then submitted to histological routine. 3µm-thick cuts were obtained from the paraffin blocks and stained with Picrosirius for collagen fibers and Weigert-oxone for elastic fibers. The cuts underwent immunohistochemical reactions for CD4 and CD8, ICAM-1 for blood vessels and CD1 for Langerhans cells. The quantification of collagen and elastic fibers and vessels was done by area fraction (%). The evaluation of Langerhans cells was obtained by the number of CD1 positive cells per area of epidermis (µm2). Positive CD4 and CD8 cells in the dermis were evaluated by a semiquantitative method.

Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics: mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum value and median. To assess whether treatment made a difference, we compared pre- and post-treatment data. The values were subjected to normality test. When the normality test was significant, we used the statistical test of analysis of variance. When values did not follow a normal distribution, we used the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric statistical test. Statistical tests were performed using the SigmaStat (JandelCientific, CA, USA) software, with significance level of p <0.05.

 

RESULTS

Clinical improvement of the skin after 6 months of treatment was moderate to great in 76.92% of the cases. (p <0.05) (Figure 1).

Histopathological evaluation revealed marked and significant increase of 51.33% (p <0.05) of collagen fibers and 44.13% of elastic fibers (p <0.05) (Figures 2 and 3). We also observed that these newly formed collagen and elastic fibers had a uniform distribution following a parallel axis to the surface of the epidermis, involving the superficial, mid and deep reticular dermis.

The quantification of CD1+ Langerhans cells at baseline was 896.440 cells/mm2 and 725.900 cells/mm2 after treatment (p = 0.083), showing no significant difference. 

Evaluation of CD8 lymphocytes showed no difference (p = 0,123) between pre-(1.0) and post-treatment (1,0), whereas in relation to CD4 lymphocytes a reduction of intensity (3.0) was observed after treatment, as compared to pre-treatment (2.5), and this difference was significant (p = 0.5). 

There was a significant increase in area fraction of small blood vessels in the dermis, nonectatic, expressed by ICAM-1 positive, 6 months after initiation of treatment, ranging from 0.527% to 0.924% (p <0.05) (Figure 4).

 

DISCUSSION

Non-ablative photorejuvenation is a method that has been extensively studied seeking the reversal of skin aging, through the use of IPL, to cause dermal damage without ablation of the epidermis. The dermis reacts to the aggression by increasing the production of collagen and reabsorbing elastotic material.6 Explanations for the synthesis of new collagen include the absorption of light by blood, which increases the temperature around the vessels, transferring thermal damage to surrounding tissue and causing the release of inflammatory mediators that induce the healing process. Energy would also directly stimulate fibroblasts to produce more collagen.7

Patients in this study showed an improvement in flaccid skin related to the increase of collagen in the deep reticular dermis, which promoted a "skin tightening" effect in these patients after treatment.

These results were also obtained in studies that used different types of laser for non-ablative photorejuvenation to treat aging skin. These studies showed collagen synthesis and improved solar elastosis at different levels on histopathological evaluation.3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

Side effects such as edema and erythema of photoaged skin, observed immediately after application of IPL, are due to inflammation of the skin, caused by the interaction of light with tissue, which releases heat. 11 These effects lasted from 24 to 72 hours and completely disappeared. In addition to edema and erythema, the possibility of blistering 24-36 hours after the session, with subsequent formation of crusts that disappear within 7 to 14 days, has been reported in the literature.11 In the present study, 22% of the subjects had crusts on the face, which appeared 24 hours after the session and lasted about a week. Since their duration was shorter than the turnover time of the epidermis (four weeks), they were probably caused by superficial burning.12

Fournier states that in all processes of remodeling or "resurfacing", it is expected that the Grenz zone thickens by increased collagen deposition, with reorganization into a parallel arrangement with compact fibrils. He argues, however, that it takes months for this process to occur after the procedure. 9

Sadick, in a study of non-ablative photorejuvenation, states that the results are delayed. Pigmentation, vascular and sebaceous changes are noted in 3 to 6 months, and reduction of wrinkles is observed after 12 to 18 months. 13

Feng and Zhao declared that the mechanism of action of IPL for rejuvenation can be explained by increased activity of fibroblasts, fibroblast hyperplasia and rearrangement of collagen and elastin within the stroma. 14

Li et al. evaluated the efficacy and safety of IPL in the treatment of facial photoaging in Asians; 89.5% of the patients rated their overall improvement as excellent or good. Adverse effects were limited to mild pain and transient erythema. 15

IPL treatment did not promote change in skin immunity in relation to CD1, CD4 and CD8. These findings have not been described in the literature. Salgado studied the ablative technique using carbon dioxide laser and found that the amount of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes was the same, before and after 15 and 90 days of treatment. 16

This study is the first to show an increase of ICAM-1 in the dermis 6 months after the start of treatment. This increase was statistically significant, showing an increase of blood capillaries in the dermis. It is known that ICAM is a membrane glycoprotein of intercellular adhesion, and is associated with leukocyte adhesion to vascular endothelium. This change may be associated with inflammation, since ICAM-glycoprotein is produced when there is invasion of the vessel wall by leukocytes, or simply be evidence of neovascularization by reperfusion of pre-existing vessels. 17,18

 

CONCLUSION

IPL is a good treatment option for cutaneous photoaging. It is a non-ablative, safe and effective technique, since the clinical improvement observed by patients is supported by histological analysis.

 

REFERENCES

1. Gilchrest BA. 5km aging and photoaging: and overview. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21:610-3.         [ Links ]

2. Odom RB. Topical tretinoin for the treatment of photo clamaged skin. In: Weelmd RG, editor. Cutaneous surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1994. p.28-9.         [ Links ]

3. Goldberg DJ, Cutler KB. Nonablative treatment of rhytids with intense pulsed light. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26:196-200.         [ Links ]

4. Fitzpatrick TB. Fitzpatrick´s reactivity of human skin to solar radiation based on skin phototypes I to V: table 138-5. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Golsmith LA, Katz SI, Fitzpatrick TB. Dermatology in general medicine. 15th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1999. p.1606.         [ Links ]

5. Glogau RG. Chemical peeling and aging skin. J Geriatr Dermatol. 1994;2:30-5.         [ Links ]

6. Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S. Histologic evaluation of a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in the nonablative treatment of wrinkles. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:744-6.         [ Links ]

7. Lee MWC. Combination 532-nm and 1064-nm lasers for noninvasive skin rejuvenation and toning. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139:1265-76.         [ Links ]

8. Menaker GM, Wrone DA, Willians RM, Moy RL. Treatment of facial rhytids with a nonablative laser: a clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:440-4.         [ Links ]

9. Fournier N, Dahan S, Barneon G, Diridollou S, Lagarde JM, Gall Y, et al. Nonablative remodeling: clinical, histologic, ultrasound imaging, and profilometric evaluation of a 1540 nm Er:Glass laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:799-806.         [ Links ]

10. Trelles MA, Allones I, Luna R. Facial rejuvenation with a nonablative 1320 nm Nd:YAG laser: a preliminary clinical and histologic evaluation. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:111-6.         [ Links ]

11. Spicer MS, Goldberg DJ. Lasers in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34:1-25.         [ Links ]

12. Kawada A, Shiraishi H, Asai M, Kameyama H, Sangen Y, Aragane Y, et al. Clinical improvement of solar lentigines and ephelides with an intense pulsed light source. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:504-8.         [ Links ]

13. Sadick NS. Update on non-ablative light therapy for rejuvenation: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32:120-8.         [ Links ]

14. Feng YJ, Zhao JY. Skin rejuvenation in Asian skin: the analysis of clinical effects and basic mechanisms of intense pulsed light. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7:273-9.         [ Links ]

15. Li YH, Wu Y, Chen JZ, Gao XH, Liu M, Shu CM, et al. Application of a new intense pulsed light device in the treatment of photoaging skin in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:1459-64.         [ Links ]

16. Salgado AGM. Estudo imuno-histoquímico da pele antes e depois do laser de CO2 ultrapulsado [dissertação]. São Paulo (SP): Universidade de São Paulo; 2001.         [ Links ]

17. Cid MC, Cebrián M, Font C, Coll-Vinent B, Hernández-Rodríguez J, Esparza J, et al. Cell adhesion molecules in the development of inflammatory infiltrates in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:184-94.         [ Links ]

18. Nowak-Sliwinska P, van Beijnum JR, van Berkel M, van den Bergh H, Griffioen AW. Vascular regrowth following photodynamic therapy in the chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Angiogenesis. 2010;13:281-92.         [ Links ]

 

 

Mailing address:
Regia Celli Ribeiro Patriota
Divisão de Dermatologia - Instituto Central - 3º andar
Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255 / sala 3070
05403-000 Cerqueira César - SP, Brazil
E-mail: regiapatriota@terra.com.br

Received on 26.08.2010.
Approved by the Advisory Board and accepted for publication on 21.12.2011.
Conflict of interest: None
Financial funding: None

 

 

* Work conducted at the Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo (HC-FMUSP) - Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil