Print version ISSN 0365-0596
An. Bras. Dermatol. vol.87 no.6 Rio de Janeiro Nov./Dec. 2012
Antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from skin and soft tissue infections of outpatients from a university hospital in Recife -PE, Brazil*
Perfil de resistência antimicrobiana de isolados de Staphylococcus aureus provenientes de infecções de pele e tecidos moles de pacientes ambulatoriais de um hospital universitário em Recife - PE, Brasil
Fabiana Beserra CaracioloI; Maria Amélia Vieira MacielII; Josemir Belo dos SantosIII; Marcelle Aquino RabeloIV; Vera MagalhãesV
IDermatologist - Master in Tropical Medicine by the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) - Recife (PE), Brazil
IIPhD in Public Health, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ). Associate Professor of the Tropical Medicine Department of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) - Recife (PE), Brazil
IIIMaster in Tropical Medicine by the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE). Professor and Head of the Dermatology Service of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) - Recife (PE), Brazil
IVBiommedical - Master in Tropical Medicine by the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) - Recife (PE), Brazil
VPhD in Infectology by the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). Full Professor at the Tropical Medicina Department of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) - Recife (PE), Brazil
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus has a notable ability to acquire resistance to antibiotics, and methicillin resistance represents a growing public health problem. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has also become important outside the hospital environment, particularly in the United States. In Brazil, since 2005, cases of community skin infections caused by MRSA have been reported, but resistance studies involving outpatients are scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To know the resistance profile of S. aureus involved in skin and soft tissue infections of patients seen at the Dermatology outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Recife, Pernambuco State, northeastern Brazil.
METHODS: Prospective study involving 30 patients with skin and soft tissue infections, seen at the Dermatology outpatient clinic from May until November 2011. To evaluate the susceptibility of S. aureus to antibiotics, the disk diffusion method and oxacillin screening agar were used.
RESULTS: From a total of 30 samples of skin lesions, 19 (63%) had positive culture for S. aureus. The following resistance patterns of S. aureus were observed: penicillin, 95%; tetracycline, 32%; erythromycin, 21%; gentamicin, 16%; cefoxitin, 11%; oxacillin, 11%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 11%; chloramphenicol, 11%; clindamycin, 5% ; and ciprofloxacin, 0%. One of the identified MRSA was obtained from a patient without risk factors for its acquisition, and was resistant, beyond to the beta-lactams, only to tetracycline.
CONCLUSIONS: With regard to the resistance patterns of S. aureus, resistances to tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamicin were the highest. It was documented, for the first time in Pernambuco, a case of skin infection caused by community-associated MRSA.
Keywords: Community-acquired infections; Drug resistance, microbial; Skin; Staphylococcus aureus
FUNDAMENTOS: O Staphylococcus aureus possui uma notável habilidade de adquirir resistência antimicrobiana, sendo a resistência à meticilina um problema de saúde pública crescente. O S. aureus resistente à meticilina (MRSA) vem se tornando importante também fora do ambiente hospitalar, particularmente nos Estados Unidos. No Brasil, desde 2005, têm sido relatados casos de infecções cutâneas comunitárias causadas por MRSA, porém estudos de resistência envolvendo pacientes ambulatoriais são escassos.
OBJETIVO: Conhecer o perfil de resistência de S. aureus envolvidos em infecções de pele e partes moles de pacientes atendidos no ambulatório de Dermatologia de um hospital universitário de Recife, Pernambuco.
MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo envolvendo 30 pacientes com infecções de pele e tecidos moles atendidos no ambulatório de Dermatologia de maio a novembro de 2011. Para avaliação da suscetibilidade dos S. aureus aos antibióticos foram utilizados teste de disco-difusão e placa de screening de oxacilina.
RESULTADOS: Das 30 amostras analisadas, 19 (63%) tiveram cultura positiva para S. aureus. Os seguintes padrões de resistência dos S. aureus foram observados: penicilina, 95%; tetraciclina, 32%; eritromicina, 21%; gentamicina, 16%; cefoxitina, 11%; oxacilina, 11%; sulfametoxazol-trimetoprima, 11%; clorafenicol, 11%; clindamicina, 5%; e ciprofloxacina, 0%. Um dos MRSA identificados foi obtido de paciente sem fatores de risco para sua aquisição, e além de aos betalactâmicos, mostrou-se resistente apenas à tetraciclina.
CONCLUSÕES: Em relação aos padrões de resistência dos S. aureus, destacaram-se as resistências à tetraciclina, eritromicina e gentamicina. Documentou-se, pela primeira vez em Pernambuco, um caso de infecção cutânea causada por MRSA associado à comunidade.
Palavras-chave: Infecções comunitárias adquiridas; Pele; Resistência microbiana a medicamentos; Staphylococcus aureus
In conditions such as the loss of integrity of the cutaneous barrier or reduction of immunity, Staphylococcus aureus stops behaving as a commensal to become the most common etiological agent of skin infections.1 This microorganism has a notable ability to acquire resistance to antibiotics. Penicillin was introduced in the clinical practice in 1941 and ten years after it was no longer effective in most staphylococcal infections.2 This resistance is mediated by betalactamases denominated penicillinases, which are enzymes that hydrolyze the beta-lactam ring of the antibiotics that together with penicillin form the betalactam group, inactivating them. 3,4 In 1959 the production of penicillinase-resistant beta-lactams was initiated.2,5,6 Methicillin and oxacillin were the first of these medications to be used.6
The first methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain was reported in England in 1961, after being isolated from a hospitalized patient.5,7 Immediately after, similar cases were reported in other European countries, and later in Japan, Australia and the United States, with dissemination of this microorganism, transforming it into the main cause of hospital-acquired infections.5 S. aureus strains denominated as MRSA are resistant to all beta-lactams (except for cephalosporins with anti-MRSA activity) and to combinations of these with beta-lactamase inhibitors.6,8
The first genuine cases of community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infection were described in 1993 in Australia.2 The isolates had been identified in the end of the 1980's in an indigenous population on the West of the country.9 Aside from the absence of risk factors, what the cases had in common was the fact that the infections had been caused by non-multiresistant MRSA. In the second half of the 1990's, MRSA infections were also reported in the United States, occurring in children of the community and without risk factors. Since then, CA-MRSA has emerged worldwide, principally in the United States, where in many metropolitan areas it is the most common identifiable cause of skin and soft tissue infections. 2,10,11
Due to the constant changes in the epidemiology and the resistant patterns of S. aureus, their vigilance in different regions is important. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial resistance profile of S. aureus isolates obtained from outpatients with skin and soft tissue infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study was prospective, observational, descriptive, case series type, involving patients with signs of skin and soft tissue infections who sought treatment at the Dermatology outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Recife, Pernambuco State, northeastern Brazil, between May and November 2011. The inclusion criteria were: presence of clinical signs of primary impetigo, secondary impetigo, ecthyma, folliculitis, furunculosis, carbuncle, acute abscess of subcutaneous cellular tissue, necrotizing fasciitis, periporitis or sycosis; and beginning of the infection in the community. Hospitalization at the time of study entry was an exclusion criterion. The research project was approved by the Ethical Committee in Research under registration number 34/2011. To participate in the study, the patients or their legal representative signed a free informed consent.
At the time of the consultation, the following data were collected from each patient participating in the study: age; gender; hospitalization, residency in a long-term care facility or dialysis in the previous 12 months; presence of permanent indwelling catheter or percutaneous medical device; domiciliary contact in the previous 12 months with individuals with some of the risk factors for acquisition of MRSA previously cited; prior positive culture for MRSA; use of antibiotics in the previous 12 months and at the time of study entry. The type of skin infection presented by patient was also noted in the data collection form.
The samples of purulent material were obtained by rubbing a sterile cotton swab in the most exuberant lesion of each patient, after previous decontamination of the margins and surface of the lesions with 70% alcohol. In the cases of furuncles or abscesses with indication of drainage, the samples were collected from the deepest part of the lesion. After collection, the swabs were immediately placed in Stuart's transport medium and transported to the Bacteriology sector of the laboratory of the hospital, where conventional methods were carried out for isolating and identifying the bacteria, as well as the susceptibility tests to the antimicrobials.
The gram-positive cocci that presented positive tests for catalase, desoxiribonuclease and mannitol fermentation were considered S. aureus.
The resistance profile of the S. aureus isolates was evaluated using the disk diffusion method, according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, using the following antimicrobial disks: penicillin (10 µg), oxacillin (1 µg), clindamycin (2 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg) and tetracycline (30 µg). 8 The isolates that appeared, in the disk diffusion method, as sensitive to clindamycin and resistant to erythromycin were submitted to the D test for detection of the MLSB phenotype (inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance), in which clindamycin resistance is only apparent after induction by erythromycin.
Oxacillin screening agar
S. aureus isolates that were identified as oxacillin-resistant and/or cefoxitin-resistant by the disk diffusion method were taken to the laboratory of the Microbiology and Immunology Department of the university, where they were submitted to the oxacillin screening agar, being made, initially, subcultures on nutrient agar plates. After the colonies grew, direct suspension of the colonies was carried out to obtain a turbidity equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard, and proceeding with the inoculum in an area at 10 to 15 mm in diameter in plates containing Mueller Hinton agar medium with NaCl (4% w/v;
0.68 mol/L) and 6 µg/ml of oxacillin. These plates were incubated at 35ºC for 24 hours, and the lineage in which plates was observed growth of more than one colony was considered oxacillin resistant.8 As quality control, standard strains for MRSA and MSSA were used: S. aureus ATCC 29213 and S. aureus ATCC 33591, respectively.12
A total of 30 patients were evaluated: 18 females (60%) and 12 males. In relation to age, 1 (3.3%) patient was younger than 2 years of age, 3 (10%) were between the ages of 2 and 17 years, 22 (73.3%) were between the ages of 18 and 59 years, and 4 (13.3%) were 60 years of age or older. From the 30 collected samples, 29 (97%) had positive cultures for bacteria; 19 (66%) of which had S. aureus isolated.
The highest resistance rates of the S. aureus found were to penicillin, tetracycline, gentamicin and erythromycin (Table 1).
From the 19 S. aureus isolates, 1 was resistant to cefoxitin and another was resistant to cefoxitin and to oxacillin in the disk diffusion method. These two S. aureus isolates were submitted to the oxacillin screening agar and both of them were resistant to oxacillin by this test, being characterized as MRSA. These isolates were then classified as resistant to all researched beta-lactams researched. One of the MRSA isolates was obtained from a patient without risk factors for its acquisition (Table 2). The patients from whom MRSA were isolated were not using antibiotics at the time of study entry.
In the present study, S. aureus was the most frequent pathogen isolated from skin and soft tissue pyogenic lesions. This result was already expected and agrees with the results of other studies.13-16
With regard to the resistance patterns of the S. aureus isolates, the resistances to tetracycline, erythromycin and to gentamicin were the highest. In 2001, Zavadinack et al. observed, in an study of antimicrobial resistance of S. aureus obtained from cutaneous abscesses of community origin in the state of Paraná, a lower level of resistance to tetracycline (9.86%), erythromycin (11.49%) and gentamicin (2.86%).1 The highest resistance rates found to these antibiotics in our study can be justified, in part, by the indiscriminate and inadequate use of these drugs along the years, favored by their low cost. The use of antimicrobials selects the lineages of resistant bacteria and it is likely the main cause of antimicrobial resistance.3
The resistance rate to gentamicin, in the present study, was also higher than that reported by Diamantis et al., who found that only 0.7% of the S. aureus strains were resistant to this antibiotic. In this American study, the resistances to erythromycin (51.7%), methicillin (27.3%) and clindamycin (23.8%) were the highest.17
Ribeiro et al., in 2005, reported the first cases of skin and soft tissue infections caused by CA-MRSA in Brazil.18 Since then, various other similar studies have been carried out, especially in the southern region of the country. In 2009, for example, two cases of skin and soft tissue infection caused by CA-MRSA were reported in the city of Porto Alegre.19,20 In the same year, Rozenbaum et al. reported the case of 10-year-old non-immunocompromised girl, who had been admitted to a hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro in 2007, presenting clinical manifestations of septic shock, and from whom MRSA was isolated. Seven days before admission, the patient had developed furunculosis involving the buttocks and cellulite in the left thigh; and she had no history of previous hospitalization or healthcare-associated procedures in the last year.21
Gelatti, in a prospective study carried out in the city of Porto Alegre, between September of 2007 and March of 2008, found that 8.6% of the S. aureus isolated from patients with skin infections attended in a Dermatology outpatient clinic or with up to 48 hours of hospital admission were CA-MRSA. Patients with recent hospital admission or surgical interventions, presence of intravenous catheter or long-term indwelling intravascular or cutaneous devices, and admission to nursing homes were excluded from this study.15
CA-MRSA infection had already been reported in northeastern Brazil by Nascimento-Carvalho et al., who studied, retrospectively, S. aureus obtained from patients younger than 20 years of age with infections caused by this microorganism and that were treated between 1995 and 2005 in a pediatric teaching hospital in Salvador, Bahia State. Out of the 122 S. aureus isolated from outpatients or within 48 hours after admission to a hospital and without the risk factors researched for MRSA, six (4.9%) were resistant to oxacillin in the disk diffusion method. This study evaluated a higher number of S. aureus isolates than the present study; however, it was a retrospective study of infections caused by S. aureus in general. Only two of the isolates characterized as CA-MRSA in the study were obtained from patients with skin infections.22
There were already reports of MRSA identified in studies of infections and colonizations by S. aureus in hospitalized patients in Pernambuco 23,24,25 standing out the Cavalcanti et al.'s study, which studied S. aureus of patients in the first 48 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission in a university hospital in Recife, and found three MRSA isolates colonizing patients considered as being of community origin (patients admitted from their residences or hospitalized for less than 48 hours before ICU admission). 25 This study, however, differently from the present study, evaluated only colonization.
The first sample of MRSA identified in our study was obtained during the drainage of a furuncle presented by a 40-year-old man. Skin and soft tissue infections represent approximately 90% of cases of CA-MRSA infection,2 and furunculosis is the most frequently observed disease.26
The patient, from whom the first MRSA isolate was obtained in the present study, had no risk factors for acquisition of MRSA, characterizing the MRSA isolate, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria, as a CA-MRSA. The CDC defines CA-MRSA as MRSA that has been isolated from patients who have no history of positive culture for MRSA from any body site obtained more than 48 hours after admission to a hospital (if hospitalized); prior MRSA infection or colonization; hospitalization, surgery, residence in health institution, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis in the last year; and presence of percutaneous devices or catheters.27 Moreover, the first MRSA isolate was resistant, beyond to the betalactams, only to tetracycline, being characterized phenotypically as a CA-MRSA. In contrast to HA-MRSA, which is characterized by resistance to various classes of antimicrobials, CA-MRSA is generally resistant only to beta-lactams and to one or two other classes of antibiotics.28
The second MRSA isolate of the study was obtained from a three-month-old girl who although was born by normal delivery, remained hospitalized for a little longer than 48 hours at the time of birth. Moreover, the MRSA isolate obtained from this patient was multiresistant, being characterized epidemiologically and phenotypically as a HA-MRSA. 27,28
The present study showed that the antimicrobial resistance patterns of S. aureus vary according to geographic region, being more evident in the study population the resistance to tetracycline, erythromycin and gentamicin. These results suggest that the beta-lactams, with the exception of penicillin, ampicillin and amoxicillin, continue to represent a good option of empirical therapy for patients with pyodermitis who seek treatment at the Dermatology outpatient clinic of this university hospital.
Until then, there was no evidence in the literature of cases of skin and soft tissue infections caused by CA-MRSA in Pernambuco State. The study then permitted to document, for the first time in the state, a case of skin infection caused by this microorganism, contributing with new information about its the epidemiology in northeastern Brazil.
1. Zavadinack Netto M, Herreiro F, Bandeira COP, Ito Y, Ciorlin E, Saqueti EE, et al. Staphylococcus aureus: incidência e resistência antimicrobiana em abscessos cutâneos de origem comunitária. Acta Scientiarum. 2001;23:709-12. [ Links ]
2. Deleo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010;375:1557-68. [ Links ]
3. Tavares W. Bactérias gram-positivas problemas: resistência do estafilococo, do enterococo e do pneumococo aos antimicrobianos. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2000;33:281-301. [ Links ]
4. Que Y, Moreillon P. Staphylococcus aureus (Including Staphylococcal Toxic Shock). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell Douglas, and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009. p. 2543-78. [ Links ]
5. Boyce JM, Cookson B, Christiansen K, Hori S, Vuopio-Varkila J, Kocagoz S, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:653-63. [ Links ]
6. Mimica MJ, Mendes CMF. Diagnóstico laboratorial da resistência à oxacilina em Staphylococcus aureus. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2007;43:399-406. [ Links ]
7. Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE. The evolution of staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2008;8:747-63. [ Links ]
8. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI document M100- S20-U. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2010. [ Links ]
9. Udo EE, Pearman JW, Grubb WB. Genetic analysis of community isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Western Australia. J Hosp Infect. 1993;25:97-108. [ Links ]
10. Miller LG, Kaplan SL. Staphylococcus aureus: A community pathogen. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009;23:35-52. [ Links ]
11. Khawcharoenporn T, Tice A. Empiric outpatient therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cephalexin, or clindamycin for cellulitis. Am J Med. 2010;123:942-50. [ Links ]
12. Perez LRR, d'azevedo PA. Evaluation of the accuracy of various phenotypic tests to detect oxacilin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Braz J Infect Dis. 2008;12:210-2. [ Links ]
13. Cohen PR, Kurzrock R. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infectious: an emerging clinical problem. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004;50:277-80. [ Links ]
14. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, et al. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666-74. [ Links ]
15. Gelatti LC. Caracterização Fenotípica e Genotípica de Staphylococcus aureus Isolados de Pacientes com Infecções Cutâneas Atendidos em Unidades de Assistência à Saúde na Cidade de Porto Alegre-RS [dissertação]. Porto Alegre (RS): Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde; 2009. 119 p. [ Links ]
16. Forcade NA, Parchman ML, Jorgensen JH, Du LC, Nyren NR, Treviño LB, et al. Prevalence, severity, and treatment of communityacquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections in 10 medical clinics in Texas: a South Texas Ambulatory Research Network (STARNet) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24:543-50. [ Links ]
17. Diamantis ML, Ortega-Loayza AG, Morrell DS. Update on the characterization of Staphylococcus aureus skin infections in a pediatric dermatology tertiary health care outpatient facility: antibiotic susceptibility patterns and decreased methicillin resistance. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;64:440-1. [ Links ]
18. Ribeiro A, Dias C, Silva-Carvalho MC, Berquó L, Ferreira FA, Santos RNS, et al. First Report of infection with Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in South America. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1985-8. [ Links ]
19. Razera F, Stefani S, Bonamigo RR, Olm GS, Dias CAG, Narvaez GA. CA-MRSA em furunculose: relato de caso do sul do Brasil. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:515-8. [ Links ]
20. Gelatti LC, Sukiennik T, Becker AP, Inoue FM, Carmo MS, Castrucci FMS, et al. Sepse por Staphylococus aureus resistente à meticilina adquirida na comunidade no sul do Brasil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42:458-60. [ Links ]
21. Rozenbaum R, Sampaio MG, Batista GS, Garibaldi AM, Terra GM, Souza MJ, et al. The first report in Brazil of severe infection caused by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CAMRSA). Braz J Med Biol Res. 2009;42:756-60. [ Links ]
22. Nascimento-Carvalho CM, Lyra TG, Alves NN, Caldas RM, Barberino MG. Resistance to methicillin and other antimicrobials among community-acquired and nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus strains in a pediatric teaching hospital in Salvador, Northeast Brazil. Microb Drug Resist. 2008;14:129-31. [ Links ]
23. de Miranda OP, Silva-Carvalho MC, Ribeiro A, Portela F, Cordeiro RP, Caetano N, et al. Emergence in Brazil of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates carrying SCCmecIV that are related genetically to the USA800 clone. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:1165-72. [ Links ]
24. Vilela MA. Padrão de resistência antimicrobiana de casos de infecções nosocomiais no Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil, 2002-2003. [dissertação]. Recife (PE): Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2004. 91p. [ Links ]
25. Cavalcanti SMM, França ER, Cabral C, Vilela MA, Montenegro F, Menezes D, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus introduced into intensive care units of a university hospital. Braz J Infect Dis. 2005;9:56-63. [ Links ]
26. Atanaskova A, Tomecki KJ. Innovative management of recurrent furunculosis. Dermatol Clin. 2010;28:479-87. [ Links ]
27. Minnesota Department of Health. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Health Disease Control Newsletter. 2004;32:61-72. [ Links ]
28. Diep BA, Chambers HF, Graber CJ, Szumowski JD, Miller LG, Han LL, et al. Emergence of multidrug-resistant, community-associated, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone USA300 in men who have sex with men. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:249-57. [ Links ]
Fabiana Beserra Caraciolo
Rua Emboabas, 456. - Brooklin Paulista
04623-011 São Paulo, SP
Tel: 11 7778 7654
Received on 04.02.2012
Approved by the Advisory Board and accepted for publication on 29.02.2012.
Conflict of Interests: None.
Financial support: None.
* Work performed at the Department of Dermatology of the Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) - Recife (PE), Brazil.