Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Neomycin: sources of contact and sensitization evaluation in 1162 patients treated at a tertiary service Study conducted at the Dermatology Annex of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

Abstract

Background:

Neomycin is used in several over-the-counter pharmaceutical formulations in Brazil. In Europe and Canada, where it is not freely available, its sensitization frequency is lower than in the United States, where this does not occur.

Objective:

To present the frequency of sensitization to neomycin observed in a tertiary hospital and the pharmaceutical formulations sold in Brazil containing neomycin.

Method:

Retrospective analysis of positive results to neomycin, obtained through patch tests performed in a tertiary hospital, from 2009 to 2018 and investigation of topical drugs and vaccines containing neomycin in Brazilian databases available on the internet.

Results:

Among 1,162 patients, 71 (6%) had positive reactions to neomycin, 65% female and 35% male individuals, 46% were over 50 years old, and 24% had a personal history of atopy. The dermatitis lasted from four months to 20 years. Lesions were located in 69% of the patients on the upper limbs, in 55% they were on the lower limbs, and in 42% they were disseminated in more than 4 sites. Polysensitization was detected in 55% of cases. Of these, 28% were linked to sensitization to rubber allergens and 27% to potassium bichromate. A total of 158 topical presentations of neomycin were found: 79 ointments, 58 creams, 10 ophthalmic solutions, seven otological solutions, one oral solution, two nasal solutions, and one antiseptic powder, in addition to 11 types of vaccines.

Study limitations:

Retrospective study.

Conclusion:

Sensitization to neomycin occurred in 6% of the studied population, affecting more females aged over 50 years, with skin lesions located mainly on the upper and lower limbs, in the context of chronic contact dermatitis. Neomycin was found in 135 formulations, most of them available over the counter, as well as in 11 miscellaneous vaccines.

KEYWORDS
Allergic contact dermatitis; Drug allergy; Neomycin

Introduction

Neomycin is an antibiotic that belongs to the aminoglycoside family and blocks bacterial protein synthesis through the irreversible binding to the 30S ribosomal nuclear subunit. It is effective against anaerobic bacteria, staphylococci, and Gram-negative bacteria, except Pseudomonas aeruginosa. After prolonged use, bacterial resistance may develop. Its percutaneous absorption is minimal, and it is used in topical formulations for skin, ear, and eye treatment, in solutions for urinary instillation, solutions for peritoneal irrigation, dental and veterinary treatment, and in animal feed and fish tanks. Through the oral route, it is used to sterilize the intestine before surgery and to treat hepatic coma. Traces of this substance are present in several vaccines.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.,22 Atwater AR. Allergy to topical Medications. In: Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ, editors. Fischer’s Contact Dermatitis. 7th ed. Phoenix: BookBaby; 2019. p. 145.

In Brazil and the United States, it can be purchased without a prescription, which causes a high frequency of sensitization, unlike in European countries, where this frequency is low.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.,33 Warshaw EM, Shaver RL, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Atwater AR, Fransway AF, et al. Patch test reactions associated with nontopical medications: a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2018. Dermatitis. 2021;32:e127-9.,44 Elliott JF, Abbas M, Hull P, de Gannes G, Toussi R, Milani A. Decreasing rates of neomycin sensitization in western Canada. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20:446-52.

Methods

A total of 1,162 patients with suspected contact dermatitis underwent patch tests between October 2009 and October 2018. The Brazilian Standard Battery was used, consisting of 30 substances (FDA-allergenic, RJ, Brazil) using Finn chambers®. (Oy, Finland) applied to the back of patients with readings at 48 and 96 hours. Reactions were graded as +, ++ and +++ following the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group (ICDRG) criteria.

The data were collected in an Excel® table, with the selection of those positive for neomycin, which were analyzed regarding demographic aspects, location of lesions, time of evolution, personal history of atopy, association with other allergens and relevance based on the clinical history and exposure to the agent. An internet search was also carried out on generic and similar brand drugs, in addition to vaccines containing neomycin available in our environment. These drugs were categorized according to the active principles associated with neomycin and then redistributed according to the vehicles available on the market.

Results

Among 1162 patients, 71 (6%) had positive reactions to neomycin, 46 (65%) were female and 25 (35%) male individuals, 21 (29.5%) were Caucasians and 50 (70.5%) non-Caucasians. Age ranged from 15 to 77 years (mean 53.5), with 33 (46%) being older than 50 years (Table 1). Seventeen (24%) had a personal history of atopy. The dermatitis lasted from four months to 20 years, with 77.5% of the cases being lasting up to five years. Forty-nine (69%) had lesions on the upper limbs, 39 (55%) on the lower limbs, followed by the cervical region and dorsum of the hands, which were both affected in 28 (39%). Twelve patients (17%) had lesions on the eyelids, eight (11%) on the ears and none on the anogenital area. Thirty (42%) were disseminated, with the involvement of four or more sites (Table 2). Thirty-two (45%) were positive from one to three allergens, and 39 (55%) were positive to more than three. Current relevance was established in ten patients (14%) and considered as past relevance in 20 (28%). Twenty cases (28%) had allergic contact dermatitis to rubber as their main diagnosis, with 17 (24%) having a rubberrelated occupational nature. Nineteen patients (27%) were sensitized to potassium bichromate, of which 11 (15%) were occupational, related to cement (Table 3).

Table 1
Demographic data of 71 patients sensitized to neomycin.
Table 2
Most frequent sites of ACD to neomycin.
Table 3
Polysensitization.

Regarding the substances, neomycin was present not only in isolated formulations but also associated with other active principles, which are also frequent allergens, such as corticosteroids, other antibacterial agents, antifungals, anesthetics and steroids, as shown in Table 4. As for the commercial products, Table 5 provides a list of those that contain neomycin, in addition to the composition of each item. Fifty-eight creams, 79 ointments, ten ophthalmic solutions, seven otological solutions, one oral solution, two nasal solutions, and one antiseptic powder were found.55 consultaremedios.com [Internet]. Brasil. Consulta Remédio. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. Available from: https://consultaremedios.com.br.
https://consultaremedios.com.br....
,66 medlineup.gov [Internet]. MedlinePlus. [cited 2022 May 14]. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601098.html.
https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a6...
,77 consultas.anvisa.gov [Internet]. Brasil. Consultas Anvisa - Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. Available from: https://consultas.anvisa.gov.br/#/bulario/.
https://consultas.anvisa.gov.br/#/bulari...

Table 4
Topical medications containing neomycin.
Table 5
Topical presentations with neomycin.

As for the vaccines, Table 6 shows the 11 immunizers that contain neomycin in their composition, either in the form of traces, as an excipient, among the residues, or among the other constituents.88 bvsms.saude.gov [Internet]. Brasil. Manual de normas e procedimentos para vacinação. Ministério da saúde. [cited 2022 Apr 04]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_procedimentos_vacinacao.pdf.
https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicaco...
,99 família.sbim.org [Internet]. Brasil. SBBIM. Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia. Família. Vacina tríplice bacteriana acelular infantil - DTPa. [cited 2022 Apr 04]. Available from: https://familia.sbim.org.br/vacinas/vacinas-disponiveis/vacina-triplice-bacteriana-acelular-infantil-dtpa.
https://familia.sbim.org.br/vacinas/vaci...
,1010 butantan.gov [Internet]. Brasil. Instituto Butantan. Vacina raiva (inativada). [cited 2022 Apr 12]. Available from: https://butantan.gov.br/assets/pdf/soros_vacinas/vacinas/Bula-Vacina-Raiva-Inativada-Instituto-Butantan-Paciente-Consulta-Remedios.pdf.
https://butantan.gov.br/assets/pdf/soros...

Table 6
Vaccines containing neomycin on the composition.

Discussion

The prevalence of positive neomycin patch tests in the general population is around 1%. Neomycin sensitization is shown to be decreasing in Europe, ranging from 1.1% to 3.8%, with a mean of 2.6%.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.,22 Atwater AR. Allergy to topical Medications. In: Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ, editors. Fischer’s Contact Dermatitis. 7th ed. Phoenix: BookBaby; 2019. p. 145. It had previously reached rates of 10.2% in Croatia and 18.4% in children from Portugal. In the United States, however, sensitization varied from 7% to 13% in the last two decades, with an average of 11.4%.33 Warshaw EM, Shaver RL, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Atwater AR, Fransway AF, et al. Patch test reactions associated with nontopical medications: a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2018. Dermatitis. 2021;32:e127-9.,1111 Hjorth N, Thomsen K. Differences in the sensitizing capacity of neomycin in creams and in ointments. Br J Dermatol. 1968;80:163-9. Canada has also shown a downward trend in this rate, influenced by the reduction in its availability to the public, sold only by medical prescription.1212 Gilissen L, Goossens A. Frequency and trends of contact allergy to and iatrogenic contact dermatitis caused by topical drugs over a 25-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:290-302. In Brazil, data from 2009 showed a frequency of 5.7%, very similar to what was found between 2009 and 2018 (6%), but during this period there were no changes in the rules for obtaining this medication as an over-the-counter drug.1313 Lazzarini R, Duarte I, Braga JCT, Ligabue SL. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical drugs: a descriptive analysis. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:30-4. It should be noted that the present data were collected with final readings at 96 hours, despite the known possibility that late reactions to neomycin can occur up to the seventh day.

Overall, ointments are less sensitizing than creams and lotions, because they contain fewer preservatives, emulsifiers, and solvents. However, studies show that the sensitizing properties of neomycin are, to some extent, determined by the vehicle. Surfactants in creams and lotions could reduce drug sensitization and, on the contrary, ointments, as they promote occlusion, would increase its absorption and consequently sensitization. Therefore, these authors recommend the use of neomycin in creams, lotions, or powders to reduce sensitization risk.22 Atwater AR. Allergy to topical Medications. In: Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ, editors. Fischer’s Contact Dermatitis. 7th ed. Phoenix: BookBaby; 2019. p. 145.,1111 Hjorth N, Thomsen K. Differences in the sensitizing capacity of neomycin in creams and in ointments. Br J Dermatol. 1968;80:163-9.

A study carried out in western Canada on the prevalence of neomycin sensitization in this region showed a predominance in females of 82.1%, whereas the data in the present study showed a prevalence of 65%, confirming the trend of greater sensitization in females. The mean age of patients was 49.5 years, with most being aged between 40 and 50 years, not much different from the present study.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.,22 Atwater AR. Allergy to topical Medications. In: Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ, editors. Fischer’s Contact Dermatitis. 7th ed. Phoenix: BookBaby; 2019. p. 145. According to other studies, allergic contact dermatitis to topical medications usually becomes more common with advancing age.33 Warshaw EM, Shaver RL, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Atwater AR, Fransway AF, et al. Patch test reactions associated with nontopical medications: a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2018. Dermatitis. 2021;32:e127-9.

The evolution of eczema was chronic in all cases, ranging from four months to five years in 77.5%. A study with data related to sensitization to topical drugs in Brazil, including neomycin, showed similar results.1313 Lazzarini R, Duarte I, Braga JCT, Ligabue SL. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical drugs: a descriptive analysis. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:30-4.

Publications on allergic contact dermatitis to topical medications show the involvement of the legs mainly, highlighting the presence of stasis dermatitis and leg ulcers. The present data showed that the upper limbs were the most affected, followed by the lower limbs, which could be explained by the association with occupational allergic contact dermatitis to rubber and cement. Other mentioned risk sites related to contact dermatitis to topical drugs are the eyelids and perianal region. The authors detected 17% of lesions on the eyelids, 11% on the ears, and no involvement of the anogenital area, although formulations for these regions were found in the authors’ country. It should be noted that 42% of the patients in the present study had disseminated body lesions.1111 Hjorth N, Thomsen K. Differences in the sensitizing capacity of neomycin in creams and in ointments. Br J Dermatol. 1968;80:163-9.,1212 Gilissen L, Goossens A. Frequency and trends of contact allergy to and iatrogenic contact dermatitis caused by topical drugs over a 25-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:290-302.,1313 Lazzarini R, Duarte I, Braga JCT, Ligabue SL. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical drugs: a descriptive analysis. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:30-4.

The factors predisposing to allergy to topical medications, including neomycin, include certain locations, such as the lower extremities, skinfolds, ears, use of occlusive dressings, transdermal medications, and pre-existing dermatoses. Among these are chronic venous insufficiency, external otitis, post-surgical wounds, chronic eczematous lesions, as observed here associated with allergic contact dermatitis to rubber and cement.33 Warshaw EM, Shaver RL, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Atwater AR, Fransway AF, et al. Patch test reactions associated with nontopical medications: a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2018. Dermatitis. 2021;32:e127-9.,44 Elliott JF, Abbas M, Hull P, de Gannes G, Toussi R, Milani A. Decreasing rates of neomycin sensitization in western Canada. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20:446-52.,1212 Gilissen L, Goossens A. Frequency and trends of contact allergy to and iatrogenic contact dermatitis caused by topical drugs over a 25-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:290-302.,1313 Lazzarini R, Duarte I, Braga JCT, Ligabue SL. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical drugs: a descriptive analysis. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:30-4.,1414 Gosnell AL, Schmotzer B, Nedorost ST. Polysensitization and individual susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2015;26:133-5.,1515 Spring S, Pratt M, Chaplin A. Contact dermatitis to topical medicaments. Dermatitis. 2012;23:210-3.

Occupational dermatitis to neomycin usually affects the hands and face and occurs in healthcare professionals, pharmacists, dentists and veterinarians, which was not observed in the present series.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.

Polysensitization, defined as the presence of positive reactions to three or more unrelated haptens, was mainly described in studies carried out with topical medications in general, mainly in patients older than 70 years.1414 Gosnell AL, Schmotzer B, Nedorost ST. Polysensitization and individual susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2015;26:133-5.,1515 Spring S, Pratt M, Chaplin A. Contact dermatitis to topical medicaments. Dermatitis. 2012;23:210-3.,1616 Green CM, Holden CR, Gawkrodger DJ. Contact allergy to topical medicaments becomes more common with advancing age: an age-stratified study. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:229-31. In the present study, positivity to more than three allergens was found in 55% of the cases.

Neomycin consists of four sugar rings linked by glycosidic bonds, and one of these rings is common to almost all aminoglycosides. Therefore, it shows cross-reactions with most of them, such as amikacin, gentamicin, kanamycin, tobramycin, paromomycin, and butyrosine. Streptomycin and spectinomycin have a peculiar structure, different from the others, occurring at a lower rate. Thus, the percentage of cross-reactions to neomycin is 90% for paromomycin and butyrosine (not available in Brazil), 70% for framycetin, 60% for tobramycin and kanamycin, 50% for gentamicin, and 4% for streptomycin.1717 Nguyen HL, Yiannias JA. Contact dermatitis to medications and skin products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:41-59.

As neomycin is often associated with bacitracin in the same topical preparations, sensitization or co-reaction to both is not uncommon, suggesting that both antibiotics could act synergistically to elicit an immune response. Formulations with three antibiotics associating polymyxin B with neomycin and bacitracin are described. As polymyxin B is not part of the standard patch test batteries, its frequency of sensitization is unknown.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.,1717 Nguyen HL, Yiannias JA. Contact dermatitis to medications and skin products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:41-59. When investigating the identified formulations, the authors detected two associations with bacitracin in ointment and antiseptic powder vehicles and seven with polymyxin B. The latter is associated with corticoids and antifungals in several presentations, including creams, ointments, otological solutions, ophthalmic suspensions, and antiseptic powders.

Small amounts of neomycin absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract can trigger the dissemination of dermatitis, the onset of lesions in previous dermatitis sites, reactivation of the positive reaction to the patch test, or disseminated contact dermatitis. The administration of other aminoglycosides can also cause this condition in patients sensitized by topical exposure to neomycin. Vaccination with preparations containing neomycin could theoretically cause the appearance of systemic reactions. However, as the elicitation threshold for reactions is 100 to 1000µg of neomycin, and the concentration found in vaccines is 25µg, it is expected that it may cause a minimal, transient, and localized reaction at the injection site, and therefore is not a contraindication to vaccination.11 Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7. A history of anaphylactic reactions to neomycin would be a contraindication to its use.

The limitation of this study refers to the fact that it is a retrospective study.

Conclusion

In this study, sensitization to neomycin was present in 6% of the studied population, affecting more frequently women aged over 50 years, mainly on the upper and lower limbs, in the context of chronic contact dermatitis. Neomycin was found in 135 formulations, most of them available without a prescription, in addition to 11 different vaccines.

Reduction in the free availability of these drugs, together with careful prescriptions, will lead to a decrease in the sensitization rate to the European levels, with neomycin use being reserved for strictly indicated cases.

  • Study conducted at the Dermatology Annex of Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
  • Financial support
    None declared.

References

  • 1
    Sasseville D. Neomycin. Dermatitis. 2010;21:3-7.
  • 2
    Atwater AR. Allergy to topical Medications. In: Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ, editors. Fischer’s Contact Dermatitis. 7th ed. Phoenix: BookBaby; 2019. p. 145.
  • 3
    Warshaw EM, Shaver RL, DeKoven JG, Taylor JS, Atwater AR, Fransway AF, et al. Patch test reactions associated with nontopical medications: a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2001-2018. Dermatitis. 2021;32:e127-9.
  • 4
    Elliott JF, Abbas M, Hull P, de Gannes G, Toussi R, Milani A. Decreasing rates of neomycin sensitization in western Canada. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20:446-52.
  • 5
    consultaremedios.com [Internet]. Brasil. Consulta Remédio. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. Available from: https://consultaremedios.com.br.
    » https://consultaremedios.com.br.
  • 6
    medlineup.gov [Internet]. MedlinePlus. [cited 2022 May 14]. Available from: https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601098.html.
    » https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a601098.html.
  • 7
    consultas.anvisa.gov [Internet]. Brasil. Consultas Anvisa - Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. [cited 2022 Mar 24]. Available from: https://consultas.anvisa.gov.br/#/bulario/.
    » https://consultas.anvisa.gov.br/#/bulario/.
  • 8
    bvsms.saude.gov [Internet]. Brasil. Manual de normas e procedimentos para vacinação. Ministério da saúde. [cited 2022 Apr 04]. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_procedimentos_vacinacao.pdf.
    » https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/manual_procedimentos_vacinacao.pdf.
  • 9
    família.sbim.org [Internet]. Brasil. SBBIM. Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia. Família. Vacina tríplice bacteriana acelular infantil - DTPa. [cited 2022 Apr 04]. Available from: https://familia.sbim.org.br/vacinas/vacinas-disponiveis/vacina-triplice-bacteriana-acelular-infantil-dtpa.
    » https://familia.sbim.org.br/vacinas/vacinas-disponiveis/vacina-triplice-bacteriana-acelular-infantil-dtpa.
  • 10
    butantan.gov [Internet]. Brasil. Instituto Butantan. Vacina raiva (inativada). [cited 2022 Apr 12]. Available from: https://butantan.gov.br/assets/pdf/soros_vacinas/vacinas/Bula-Vacina-Raiva-Inativada-Instituto-Butantan-Paciente-Consulta-Remedios.pdf.
    » https://butantan.gov.br/assets/pdf/soros_vacinas/vacinas/Bula-Vacina-Raiva-Inativada-Instituto-Butantan-Paciente-Consulta-Remedios.pdf.
  • 11
    Hjorth N, Thomsen K. Differences in the sensitizing capacity of neomycin in creams and in ointments. Br J Dermatol. 1968;80:163-9.
  • 12
    Gilissen L, Goossens A. Frequency and trends of contact allergy to and iatrogenic contact dermatitis caused by topical drugs over a 25-year period. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:290-302.
  • 13
    Lazzarini R, Duarte I, Braga JCT, Ligabue SL. Allergic contact dermatitis to topical drugs: a descriptive analysis. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84:30-4.
  • 14
    Gosnell AL, Schmotzer B, Nedorost ST. Polysensitization and individual susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2015;26:133-5.
  • 15
    Spring S, Pratt M, Chaplin A. Contact dermatitis to topical medicaments. Dermatitis. 2012;23:210-3.
  • 16
    Green CM, Holden CR, Gawkrodger DJ. Contact allergy to topical medicaments becomes more common with advancing age: an age-stratified study. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:229-31.
  • 17
    Nguyen HL, Yiannias JA. Contact dermatitis to medications and skin products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:41-59.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    04 Aug 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    30 May 2022
  • Accepted
    19 July 2022
  • Published
    30 Mar 2023
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia Av. Rio Branco, 39 18. and., 20090-003 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Tel./Fax: +55 21 2253-6747 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: revista@sbd.org.br