Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Dermoscopy of circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis Study conducted at the Dermatology Clinic, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Dear Editor,

A 71-year-old female patient of Asian descent was referred to the Dermatology Outpatient Clinic for treatment of seborrheic keratoses. Two years later, in one of the consultations, an asymptomatic lesion on the left thenar region was observed and described, characterized at the time as possible excoriation. However, due to the persistence and increase in the size investigation of the lesion was initiated. The patient denied local trauma. The lesion remained asymptomatic, measuring 1.6 × 1.2 cm, characterized by a single, rounded area, with a depressed center and slightly erythematous, non-scaling, with well-defined and raised borders (Fig. 1).

Figure 1
(A) Clinical record of the lesion after four years of evolution. (B) Detail of the lesion at higher magnification: dermatosis on the thenar region of the left palm, characterized by a slightly erythematous area with raised borders.

Dermoscopy was performed using the Dermlite DL4® device (3 Gen, San Juan Capistrano, USA) at level 0 (10×), without immersion gel. The central region of the lesion showed white dots, red dots and whitish striae, with regular and symmetrical distribution on a light pink background. In addition, a border with peripheral desquamation similar to a ‘‘step ladder’’ was observed (Figs. 2,3,4). The proposed diagnostic hypotheses were Bowen’s disease, porokeratosis, granuloma annulare, and self-inflicted trauma.

Figure 2
Dermoscopic image, with polarized light, showing white dots (blue arrow), red dots (red arrow) and whitish striae in the central region of the lesion.

Figure 3
In greater detail, dermoscopic image showing a clear difference in relief between the border and the center of the lesion.

Figure 4
Dermoscopic image of the medial border of the lesion. At this higher magnification, it is possible to see the ‘‘step-ladder’’ pattern corresponding to the anatomopatholog-ical image in Fig. 5.

A skin biopsy was performed, and histopathology revealed a well-circumscribed area in which there was a decrease in the stratum corneum (Fig. 5). After evaluating the literature and considering the result of the anatomopathological examination, the authors considered circumscribed palmar hyperkeratosis. However, the patient was lost to follow-up as of the submission of this article.

Figure 5
Histopathology of the lesion, showing a well-circumscribed area of clear cut decrease in the stratum corneum (arrow), (Hematoxylin & eosin, ×40).

Discussion

In 2002, Perez et al. published a series of ten cases, in which they described a new entity, characterized by solitary, asymptomatic, circular, circumscribed, erythematous and depressed palmar or plantar lesions - mainly on the thenar and hypothenar eminences of the palms. At the time, the authors described it as an epidermal malformation, calling it circumscribed palmoplantar hyperkeratosis (CPH) and reported that it is more prevalent in elderly patients and women, preferentially affecting the palms.11 Pérez A, Rütten A, Gold R, Urbina F, Misad C, Izquierdo MJ, et al. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis: a distinctive epidermal malformation of the palms or soles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:21-7.

Since then, about 100 cases have been described, but their etiology remains unknown. In 2013, Rocha & Nico described the first cases in Brazil, corroborating the main findings of Perez et al., although one of the cases had more than one lesion.22 Rocha LK, Nico MM. Circumscribed palmoplantar hypokeratosis: report of two Brazilian cases. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:623-6.

The first dermoscopic description of CPH in the literature was performed by Ishiko et al.,33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91. in 2007, reporting two cases in Asian women. Since then, the reports have grown in frequency, containing descriptions similar to the case reported herein: ‘‘step-ladder-like’’ desquamation on the periphery of the lesion, well-demarcated erythema, with scattered white dots, which correspond to the acrosyringia, and small reddish dots, which could correspond to enlarged capillaries.33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91.,44 Nishimura M, Nishie W, Nakazato S, Nemoto-Hasebe I, Fujita Y , Shimizu H. Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis: correlation between histopathological patterns and dermoscopic findings. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:221-2.,55 Tanioka M, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Manabe T Toichi E, Miyachi Y , Takahashi K. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease with two subtypes. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1045-7.,66 Nazzaro G, Ponziani A, Brena M, Cavicchini S. Dermoscopy confirms diagnosis of circumscribed plantar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:S43-5.,77 Urbina F, Pérez A, Requena L, Rütten A. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis 10 years after the first description: what is known and the issues under discussion. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:574-82. Vilas Boas da Silva et al. described the presence of whitish striae in two of their three cases reported.

Several etiological hypotheses have been made since the first report by Perez et al. - which suggested the possibility of a benign clonal epidermal malformation,11 Pérez A, Rütten A, Gold R, Urbina F, Misad C, Izquierdo MJ, et al. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis: a distinctive epidermal malformation of the palms or soles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:21-7. - such as dynamic proliferative disorder, a primary disorder of keratinization located in the granular layer and stratum corneum, trauma, infection of keratinocytes by HPV, and bacterial infection such as in keratolysis plantare sulcatum.33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91.

Ishiko et al. and Kanitakis et al. did not find any specific DNA or immunohistochemical markers for HPV.33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91.,99 Kanitakis J, Lora V, Chouvet B, Zambruno G, Haftek M, Faure M. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease of desquamation? Immunohistological study of five cases and literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:296-301. However, a greater presence of Ki-67 has been described in the basal keratinocytes of the lesion than in healthy skin, as well as anti-pan keratin AE1 + AE3, except in the regions of the acrosyringium. In the suprabasal keratinocytes of the lesion, a higher expression of cytokeratin 16 was observed, with a reduction of CK-2e,33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91. CK-9 and connexin 26.55 Tanioka M, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Manabe T Toichi E, Miyachi Y , Takahashi K. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease with two subtypes. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1045-7. This abnormal expression of keratins could explain the disease as a keratinization disorder, and even suggest the existence of subtypes.33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91.,55 Tanioka M, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Manabe T Toichi E, Miyachi Y , Takahashi K. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease with two subtypes. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1045-7.,99 Kanitakis J, Lora V, Chouvet B, Zambruno G, Haftek M, Faure M. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease of desquamation? Immunohistological study of five cases and literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:296-301.

Urbina et al., in their literature review of 69 cases, demonstrated that most cases occur in females, over 40 years old, with a solitary lesion on the thenar region, and no previously reported trauma77 Urbina F, Pérez A, Requena L, Rütten A. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis 10 years after the first description: what is known and the issues under discussion. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:574-82.. The patient in this report fits all this information.

Regarding the histopathological correlation, partial and abrupt loss of the stratum corneum, basket-weave orthokeratosis, capillary ectasy, and a mild inflammatory process in the superficial dermis, consistent with the erythematous background on dermoscopy, have been described. The whitish dots on dermoscopy could correspond to the acrosyringium spared from corneal loss, although Vilas Boas da Silva suggested that hyperkeratosis would explain the fact that it was more visible. There has been no description of cornoid lamella, even after the evaluation of multiple slices.33 Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91.,44 Nishimura M, Nishie W, Nakazato S, Nemoto-Hasebe I, Fujita Y , Shimizu H. Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis: correlation between histopathological patterns and dermoscopic findings. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:221-2.,55 Tanioka M, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Manabe T Toichi E, Miyachi Y , Takahashi K. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease with two subtypes. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1045-7.,66 Nazzaro G, Ponziani A, Brena M, Cavicchini S. Dermoscopy confirms diagnosis of circumscribed plantar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:S43-5.,77 Urbina F, Pérez A, Requena L, Rütten A. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis 10 years after the first description: what is known and the issues under discussion. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:574-82.,88 Silva PTB, Rodríguez-Lomba E, Avilés-Izquierdo JA, Ciudad-Blanco C, Suárez-Fernández R. Dermoscopic Features of Circumscribed Palmar Hypokeratosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:609-11.,1010 Wechter T, Kantor R, Siamas K, Alapati U. Circumscribed palmoplantar hypokeratosis: a case report and review of the literature. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26, 13030/qt18r883m7.

Therefore, this report corroborates the diagnostic value of dermoscopic evaluation in CPH, since it accurately correlates with histopathology, and can help to sort out the main differential diagnoses (Bowen’s disease and porokeratosis).

  • Study conducted at the Dermatology Clinic, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
  • Financial support
    None declared.

References

  • 1
    Pérez A, Rütten A, Gold R, Urbina F, Misad C, Izquierdo MJ, et al. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis: a distinctive epidermal malformation of the palms or soles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:21-7.
  • 2
    Rocha LK, Nico MM. Circumscribed palmoplantar hypokeratosis: report of two Brazilian cases. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88:623-6.
  • 3
    Ishiko A, Dekio I, FujimotoA, Kameyama K, Sakamoto M, Benno Y , et al. Abnormal keratin expression in circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:285-91.
  • 4
    Nishimura M, Nishie W, Nakazato S, Nemoto-Hasebe I, Fujita Y , Shimizu H. Circumscribed palmar hypokeratosis: correlation between histopathological patterns and dermoscopic findings. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:221-2.
  • 5
    Tanioka M, Miyagawa-Hayashino A, Manabe T Toichi E, Miyachi Y , Takahashi K. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease with two subtypes. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;129:1045-7.
  • 6
    Nazzaro G, Ponziani A, Brena M, Cavicchini S. Dermoscopy confirms diagnosis of circumscribed plantar hypokeratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:S43-5.
  • 7
    Urbina F, Pérez A, Requena L, Rütten A. Circumscribed palmar or plantar hypokeratosis 10 years after the first description: what is known and the issues under discussion. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:574-82.
  • 8
    Silva PTB, Rodríguez-Lomba E, Avilés-Izquierdo JA, Ciudad-Blanco C, Suárez-Fernández R. Dermoscopic Features of Circumscribed Palmar Hypokeratosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:609-11.
  • 9
    Kanitakis J, Lora V, Chouvet B, Zambruno G, Haftek M, Faure M. Circumscribed palmo-plantar hypokeratosis: a disease of desquamation? Immunohistological study of five cases and literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011;25:296-301.
  • 10
    Wechter T, Kantor R, Siamas K, Alapati U. Circumscribed palmoplantar hypokeratosis: a case report and review of the literature. Dermatol Online J. 2020;26, 13030/qt18r883m7.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    04 Aug 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    13 Jan 2021
  • Accepted
    07 Jan 2022
  • Published
    20 Apr 2023
Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia Av. Rio Branco, 39 18. and., 20090-003 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Tel./Fax: +55 21 2253-6747 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: revista@sbd.org.br