Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

McCormack classification and kyphotic deformity in thoracolumbar burst fractures

Abstracts

The increasing incidence of thoracolumbar kyphosis after conservative treatment of burst fractures is a complication reported by several authors. We performed a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 33 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with cast or brace immobilization between 1992 and 2004 to check for a correlation between thoracolumbar kyphosis and Load Sharing Classification, which provides fracture severity scores according to body comminution, vertebral body fragments displacement and the amount of kyphosis correction delivered after treatment. After an average of 30 months of follow-up we found a correlation between Load Sharing Classification scores (also known as McCormack's Classification), and the sagittal kyphotic deformity on these patients (p<0.05;r=0.65). Despite of being described for assessing sagittal deformity after surgical treatment, the applicability of this Classification can be considered for patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures submitted to conservative treatment.

Spinal cord injuries; Spinal fractures; Lumbar vertebrae


O aumento da cifose toracolombar após tratamento conservador da fratura tipo explosão é complicação constatada por vários autores. Realizamos estudo retrospectivo com 33 portadores de fratura toracolombar do tipo explosão submetidos ao tratamento conservador entre 1992 a 2004 para verificar a correlação entre a cifose toracolombar e a Classificação de McCormack, que pontua a gravidade da fratura conforme a cominuição do corpo, o deslocamento dos fragmentos no corpo vertebral e a quantidade de correção da deformidade em cifose após o tratamento. Após 30 meses de seguimento médio, verificamos correlação entre a pontuação da Classificação de McCormack, conhecida na literatura como load sharing classification, e o colapso vertebral sagital nestes pacientes (p<0,05;r=0,65). A despeito de ser descrita para avaliação do colapso sagital após o tratamento cirúrgico, a aplicabilidade desta Classificação pode ser considerada para os portadores de fratura toracolombar explosão submetidos ao tratamento conservador.

Traumatismos da medula espinal; Fraturas da coluna vertebral; Vértebras lombares


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

McCormack's classification and kyphotic deformity in thoracolumbar burst fractures

Osmar AvanziI; Lin Yu ChihII; Robert MevesIII; Maria Fernanda Silber CaffaroII; Rodrigo RezendeIV; Carlos Abdalla CastroV

IAssociate Ph.D. Professor, Spine Group, DOT-FCMSCSP

IIAssistant Doctor, Spine Group, DOT-FCMSCSP

IIIAssistant Ph.D. Professor, Spine Group, DOT-FCMSCSP

IVPost-graduation Student, DOT-FCMSCSP

VTrainee Doctor, Spine Group, DOT-FCMSCSP

Correspondences to Correspondences to: Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Junior 112, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, Capital CEP:01221-020 e-mails: coluna@santacasasp.org.br; robertmeves@hotmail.com

SUMMARY

The increasing incidence of thoracolumbar kyphosis after conservative treatment of burst fractures is a complication reported by several authors. We performed a retrospective study on a consecutive series of 33 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with cast or brace immobilization between 1992 and 2004 to check for a correlation between thoracolumbar kyphosis and Load Sharing Classification, which provides fracture severity scores according to body comminution, vertebral body fragments displacement and the amount of kyphosis correction delivered after treatment. After an average of 30 months of follow-up we found a correlation between Load Sharing Classification scores (also known as McCormack's Classification), and the sagittal kyphotic deformity on these patients (p<0.05;r=0.65). Despite of being described for assessing sagittal deformity after surgical treatment, the applicability of this Classification can be considered for patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures submitted to conservative treatment.

Keywords: Spinal cord injuries; Spinal fractures/therapy; Lumbar vertebrae.

INTRODUCTION

Holdsworth et al.(1), in 1963, classified thoracolumbar fractures based on the two-spine model, divided by posterior longitudinal ligament, also describing the "burst"-type fracture as being an injury secondary to vertebral body rupture following axial load. Denis(2), in 1983, re-defined those fractures using three spines: anterior, medial and posterior spine. The burst fracture showed failure on medial and anterior spine.

There is no consensus about how to treat those fractures, particularly in patients without neurological deficit. In these cases, the risk of sagittal collapse - which is a worsening of the thoracolumbar kyphosis - is one of the complications of conservative treatment. Thus, one advantage of surgical treatment is providing better outcomes concerning post-trauma kyphosis (3,4). The possibility of anticipate a sagittal collapse may, thus, help on establishing a given treatment(5,6).

A number of classifications were developed, such as the one by Denis(2) and by Gertzbein(7,8) intending to determine the best treatment suggestion(3,6,9), but the McCormack's Classification, known on international literature as Load Sharing Classification, shows that the comminution of the vertebral body, the displacement of fracture fragments and kyphosis correction are elements that influence metal instrumentation failure by sagittal collapse on these fractures(3). Following, Aligizakis et al(4,6) show the applicability of this classification for predicting post-trauma kyphosis and the functional outcome of patients with these fractures submitted to conservative treatments.

This study intended to assess the correlation between McCormack's Classification and vertebral collapse at sagittal plane in patients with thoracolumbar "burst" fractures treated conservatively with the use of plastered casts or TLSO orthosis in hyperextension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted by assessing medical files of the Filing Service of the Department of Orthopaedics, Medical College, Santa Casa de São Paulo (SAME-SCSP) of a period comprehending 1992 and 2004 after approval by the Committee of Ethics in Research on Human Beings of our Institution. A total of 33 patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture from T10 to L2 were treated with plastered cast or TLSO orthosis in hyperextension with a minimum follow-up time of six months. X-ray images - at anteroposterior and lateral planes - and computed axial tomography (CAT) - axial and sagittal planes - were reviewed. Neurological deficit was assessed based on Frankel's scale(10). Most of the reduction was made by traction and hyperextension of the thoracolumbar region with support fulcrum on the orthopaedic traction table in cases submitted to cast immobilization. Individuals with untreated fractures for more than 10 days after trauma, pathologic bone fractures or subjects with incomplete documentation were excluded from the study.

We assessed the scoring by McCormack et al.(3). (Load Sha-ring Classification), according to X-ray and CAT findings by the time of admission in hospital, which evaluates: - the amount of vertebral comminution at sagittal plane; - the shift position of fracture fragments at tomography axial plane (Figures 1 and 2); L; the amount of deformity correction in hyperextension by Cobb's method(11) (Table 1).



The outcomes were assessed by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software, version 13.0. We applied the Pearson's Correlation in order to correlate the Load Sharing score with the kyphosis worsening (sagittal collapse) angle value. We adopted a significance level of 5% (0.050).

RESULTS

The mechanisms of trauma found in the study were the following: car accident (64%) and high falls (36%). T10 vertebra was injured in two patients (6%), T11, in two (6%), T12, in five (15%), L1, in 16 (49%) and, L2, in eight (24%). With a prevalence of male patients (22 patients), the average age was 43.6 years, ranging from 12 to 65 years. Follow-up time ranged from 6 to 168 months, in an average of 30 months. All patients were neurologically intact at the moment of hospitalization.

The average Load Sharing score value was five points, ranging from three to six points. Sagittal collapse (worsening of the Cobb's angle) ranged from one to 13 degrees, with average of five degrees (Table 2).

We found a significant correlation between Load Sharing score and vertebral collapse. As the correlation coefficient signal is positive (Table 3), we can infer that the higher the score, the higher the vertebral collapse value at the end of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

The distribution of these fractures predominantly at L1 and L2 is similar to reports found in other studies. McCormack et al.(3), in 1994, in a study with 28 individuals with thoracolumbar burst fractures, indicated that the vertebra most frequently involved was L1 (40%). In 1993, Mumford et al.(12) found this kind of fracture especially at T12 (15%), L1 (30%) and L2 (15%). Weinstein et al.(13), in 1987, assessed 42 fractures conservatively treated, where 64% were found between T12 and L2. In our study, T10 was involved in two cases (6%), T11, in two (6%), T12 in five (15%), L1 in 16 (49%) and L2 in eight cases (24%).

The prevalence of these fractures in male subjects was expected, since men are most commonly involved in accidents(3,6,12), particularly car accident, which was the major cause of fractures in our study. Mumford et al.(12), in 1993, described a men/women ratio of 2:1. The mean age in our study was 43.6 years, ranging from 12 to 65 years. For comparison purposes, Mumford et al.(12), in 1993, reported a mean age of 38.5 years, ranging from 15 to 60 years, while in the case series by Weinstein et al.(13), in 1987, the mean age was 43 years, ranging from 28 to 70 years.

In long-bones fractures osteosynthesis, load sharing between implant and host bone is a basic principle seen in any internal fixation, allowing for bone union and avoiding implant fai-lure(3,8). When treating long-bones fractures with cast apparatus, the apposition of bones, the comminution degree, and the deformity on the fracture interfere on load sharing passing through fracture site. The Load Sharing Scale uses that very principle in thoracolumbar fractures(3).

Many authors assessed the applicability of the Load Sharing scale in patients submitted to surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures aiming to determine the extension and access port of the arthrodesis area(4). In our study, we assessed the usefulness of this scale in the conservative treatment for these fractures. These data can influence the selection of a given therapy for these patients, since kyphosis is an undesirable complication after plastered cast or orthosis in hyperextension(3,4).

McCormack et al.(3), in 1994, developed the Load Sharing classification by assessing 28 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures surgically treated. For these authors, this classification system can predict failures on implant mate-rials for these fractures after posterior arthrodesis. Similarly, our study shows the correlation between the Load Sharing scale with sagittal vertebral collapse in cases submitted to conservative treatment.

Hadjipavlou et al.(6) in 2002, reported functional outcomes of 100 patients with thoracolumbar fractures conservatively treated. These authors show excellent results in cases with Load Sharing scores of three to four points. Patients with five or six points, in turn, present with pain and difficulties to return to professional activities.

Jeffrey et al.(5), in 2000, assessed the applicability of the Load Sharing classification in the selection of anterior or posterior port in 51 patients with thoracolumbar fractures surgically treated, and demonstrated that thoracolumbar fractures scored with up to 6 points were appropriately treated from a posterior port, while the cases with seven or more points evolved satisfactorily after anterior and posterior approach. That finding may be explained by a more significant instability inherent of highly scored fractures. In our study, we evidenced a positive correlation of vertebral collapse with Load Sharing scores. This finding suggest that, in highly scored cases, a greater comminution of the vertebral body and the distance between fracture fragments change the property of vertebral load transport thereby occurring a greater sagittal thoracolumbar collapse. Furthermore, the correction of kyphotic deformity in hyperextension determines failure on the anterior region of the vertebra, favoring vertebral collapse.

The lack of dynamic evaluation of images, of the posterior capsuloligamentar injury severity, and of the presence of neurological deficit are some limitations of this classification. Additionally, the correlation between post-trauma kyphosis and function in these patients is widely discussed in literature(12). However, the high reproducibility among independent investigators and the usefulness for assessing a correlation between increased thoracolumbar kyphosis and severity of skeletal injuries assessed by this classification can justify its applicability after selecting a conservative treatment for these patients(6,14).

REFERENCES

Received in: 10/06/06

approved in: 02/20/07

Study conducted at the Spine Group of the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Sciences College, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, São Paulo, SP (DOT-FCMSCSP).

  • 1. Holdsworth, FW. Fractures, dislocations and fractures-dislocations of the spine. J. Bone Joint Surgery (Br) 45:6-20,1963.
  • 2. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8(8):817831.
  • 3. McCormack T, Karaikovic E, Gaines RW. The load sharing classification of spine fractures. Spine 1994;19(15):17411744.
  • 4. Aligizakis A, Katonis P, Stergiopoulos K, Galanakis I, Karabekios S, Hadjipavlou A. Functional outcome of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine managed non-operatively, with early ambulation, evaluated using the load sharing classification. Acta Orthop Belg 2002;68(3):279287.
  • 5. Jeffrey WP, Lane JR, Karaikovic EE, Gaines RW. Successful Short-Segment Instrumentation and Fusion for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures. Spine 2000;25(9):11571169.
  • 6. Aligizakis AC, Katonis PG, Sapkas G, Papagelopoulos PJ, Galanakis I, Hadjipavlou A. Gertzbein and load sharing classifications for unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;411:7785.
  • 7. Gertzbein SD. Spine update. Classification of thoracic and lumbar fractures. Spine 1994;19(5):626628.
  • 8. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 1994;3(4):184201.
  • 9. Vaccaro AR., Kim DH, Brodke DS, Harris M, Chapman JR, Schildhauer T, Routt ML, Sasso RC. Diagnosis and management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 2003;12:85-88.
  • 10. Frankel HL, Hancock DO, Hyslop G, Melzak J, Michaelis LS, Ungar GH, Vernon JD,Walsh JJ. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries of the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. I. Paraplegia 1969;7(3):179-192.
  • 11. Cobb JR. Outline for the Study of Scoliosis. In: Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedics Surgeons 1984;5:261-275.
  • 12. Mumford J, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Goel VK. Thoracolumbar burst fractures. The clinical efficacy and outcome of nonoperative management. Spine 1993;18(8):955970.
  • 13. Winstein JN, Collalto P, Lehmann TR. Thoracolumbar "burst" fractures treated conservatively: a long-term follow-up. Spine 1988;13(1):33-38.
  • 14. Dai LY, Jin WJ. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Spine 2005;30(3):354358.
  • Correspondences to:

    Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Junior 112, Vila Buarque, São Paulo, Capital
    CEP:01221-020
    e-mails:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      29 Jan 2008
    • Date of issue
      2007

    History

    • Accepted
      20 Feb 2007
    • Received
      06 Oct 2006
    ATHA EDITORA Rua: Machado Bittencourt, 190, 4º andar - Vila Mariana - São Paulo Capital - CEP 04044-000, Telefone: 55-11-5087-9502 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br