SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número2Comparison between different radiographic methods for evaluating the flexibility of scoliosis curvesExtensor digitorum brevis flap on the treatment of lower limb injuries índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Acta Ortopédica Brasileira

versão impressa ISSN 1413-7852

Acta ortop. bras. vol.22 no.2 São Paulo  2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-78522014220200748 

Original Articles

Influence of exercises on patellar height in women with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Lilian Ramiro Felicio 1  

Ana Claudia Spechoto Camargo 2  

Augusto do Prado Baffa 2  

Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi 2  

1Centro Universitário Augusto Motta, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

2Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil


ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the patellar height of volunteers with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome (PPS) during maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in open kinetic chain (OKC) and closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises.

METHODS:

Twenty healthy women, and nineteen women with patellofemoral pain syndrome were evaluated and subjected to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging during rest and MVIC in OKC and CKC at 15°, 30°, and 45° knee flexion. The patellar height was assessed by the K-Pacs program,using the Insall-Salvati index. For each exercise and knee position, patellar height was measured three times and the procedure was repeated after seven days.

RESULTS:

These data did not confirm our hypothesis that OKC exercises promote increased patellar height.

CONCLUSION:

Patellar height is not associated with PPS and suggests that CKC exercises lead an increased patellar height during knee position at 15º and 45º flexion for the PPS group. Level of Evidence II, Comparative Prospective.

Key words: Patellofemoral pain syndrome; Isometric contraction; Patella

INTRODUCTION

Patellar high is a condition frequently observed in individuals with knee malfunctions, such as the patellofemoral dysfunction (PFD), a possible correlation with its development may be observed.1 , 2

Athletes can often present patellar high, particularly those who feel pain as a result of a specific knee dysfunction.2 These individuals show patellofemoral pain syndrome (PPS) as a major condition affecting the knee.3 , 4

The increase of patella height is related to an abnormal patellofemoral joint contact that leads to increased patellofemoral compressive forces, compared with lower patella and normal patellar height.5Furthermore, it is known that the patellar high is associated with a reduction of the contact area of ​the joint, possibly also contributing to increased articular stress.6

Understanding patellofemoral kinematics of individuals with PFD in open kinetic chain (OKC) and closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises in all plans, including the sagittal plan, is of great importance, since these exercises are part of the athletes' sports training, as well as PPS conservative treatment, being effective in reducing symptoms.7 , 8

Some studies that studied, through magnetic resonance imaging of the frontal and sagittal plans, patellofemoral kinematics of individuals with PPS concluded that activity in early knee flexion, especially in OKC, can lead to an increase in lateral patellar displacement,8and that lateral patellar displacement and tilt are higher in maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in OKC when compared to CKC. However, it is not established which is the influence of OKC and CKC exercises in patellar height in individuals with PPS.

Thus, the present study aimes to compare patellar height in healthy and PPS individuals during MVIC in OKC and CKC through magnetic resonance imaging

Since patellar kinematics on the front plan is influenced by the type of exercise performed, the study has hypothesized that OKC exercises could lead to an increase in patellar height in individuals with PPS higher than those observed during CKC exercises.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A functional kinetic evaluation was performed in 39 sedentary female volunteers, who were subsequently divided into two groups: control group, which consisted of clinically healthy subjects (n = 20) and PPS group, composed of individuals with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (n = 19) according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria for each group. (Table 1) Anthropometric data of PPS volunteers and control groups are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Inclusion and exclusion criteria to control and PFD groups. 

Control Group PFD Group
Inclusion criteria • Presence of at most two signals indicating misalignment of the lower limb in functional assessment (increased Q angle, excessive subtalar pronation, abnormal mobility of the patella);12
• Absence of pain recorded on the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the last month.13
• Presence of at least three signs indicating PPS observed in functional assessment;
• Presence of pain of at least three cm visual analog scale (VAS) in the last month;13
• Presence of pain in at least two functional activities (e.g. climbing and descending stairs, squatting, kneeling, running).9,12
Exclusion criteria12 • History of injury or surgery on the osteomioarticular system of the hip, knee, or ankle;
• Individuals with neurological, cardiovascular or rheumatic diseases,
• Individuals with dislocation or subluxation of the patella.

Table 2 Anthropometric data of individuals in control and PFD groups. 

Parameters Control (n=20) PFD (n=19)
Age (years) 21.5 ± 2.16 23.47 ± 3.24
Height (cm) 160.75 ± 5.23 161.63 ± 2.24
Weight (Kg) 54.44 ± 5.23 57.89 ± 6.91

Student t test for independent samples, from the SAS program was used. The application of statistical tests showed no difference in variables between the groups.

All subjects were informed about the procedures to be performed and signed a disclosure and consent form, in accordance to the standards of the Ethics Committee on Human Research of Hospital das Clínicas, FMRP, USP (Process HCRP 4250/2005).

Volunteers from both control and PPS groups performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) during rest and MVIC in OKC and CKC in three different knee flexion angles: 15º, 30º, and 45º. The evaluation of the patellofemoral kinematics was performed on the dominant member in the control group, and the injured member in the PPS group. Throughout the examination verbal command was performed, in order to encourage the volunteers to maintain maximum effort during the examination.

The images were obtained by means of magnetic resonance imaging equipment (MRI) using a Siemens Magnetom Vision 1.5 T device (Erlangen, Germany) using a 51x21 cm knee coil, with its center aligned with the center of the patella.

Images were acquired with 15 msec repetition time (RT), 6 msec echo time (ET) 512x128 matrix and 7 mm slices thickness. The image in the sagittal plan was generated from the image in the axial plan with the greatest latero-lateral diameter among the six acquired images.8

Procedures

During the MRI exam, patients remained in the supine position and knees were positioned at 15°, 30°, and 45° flexion using a goniometer (Carci(r), Brazil) on a wooden support with non-metallic hinges to avoid interference in MRI images.9 The order in knee positioning, as well as the type of contraction performed were randomized. (Figure 1)

Figure 1 Adjustable and articulated wooden stand for knee positioning during MVIC at OKC and CKC.  

Velcro(r) tapes were used around the legs to stabilize the hip, ankle and foot. The volunteers were verbally encouraged to strengthen while extending the knee (OKC) or push the support (CKC) and maintain it during six seconds of MVIC10 to perform the image in the sagittal plan. Between each activity there was two minutes resting time in order to prevent fatigue.

The images in the axial plan of the patellofemoral joint used as reference were generated during rest and MVIC, in OKC and CKC for each knee angle, with a ratio of three seconds to generate each image in this plan. The image with higher lateral-medial patellar diameter8 was later selected (Figure 2) being the sagittal plan image generated from this one. The images were stored and analyzed using the K-Pacs software, version 1.6.0, using the Insall-Salvati index, which is the ratio between the length of the patellar ligament (LL) , measured from the lower pole of the patella to its insertion into the tibial tubercle, and the longest diagonal length of the patella (PL).11 (Figure 3) In this study the LL/PL ratios larger than 1.50 and less than 0.74 indicate, respectively, high and low patella.12

Figure 2 MRI Image of patella in axial plan with higher patellar latero- -medial diameter.  

Figure 3 Sagittal view of the patellofemoral joint demonstrating the measurements of the ligament length (LL) and the longest diagonal patella length (PL) used in Insall-Salvati index.  

Statistical Analysis

Three blinded measurements of patellar height were performed, and after seven days the measurements for analysis of intra-rater reliability were once again performed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1) was used to this end. In order to compare the characteristics of the sample a student t test was used for independent measurements (p <0.05). The comparison of the average patellar height between the groups, type of exercise, and the knee angles was performed by ANOVA two way test, with a significance level of 5% (p <0.05). The program used to perform the statistical tests was the Statistical Analysis System (SAS).

RESULTS

The analyzed parameters age, height and weight did not show significant differences between groups. Among the demographic and clinical parameters analyzed in the control group and the PPS group, only the values ​​of PPS questionnaire11 (control group, 99.0±2.3; PPS group, 77.9±8.8) and Q angle measurement (control group, 17.9±1.4; PPS group, 20.1±4.2) showed significant differences between groups. (Table 3)

Table 3 Mean and standard deviation of clinical parameters for the control group and the PPS group.  

Parameters Control (n=20) PPS (n=19)
PFD questionnaire14 (0-100) 99.0 ± 2.3* 77.9 ± 8.8
Visual Analog Scale for pain during up
and down step (0-100 mm)
___ 22 ± 18
Duration of pain (months) ___ 60.6 ± 27.2
Q Angle (degrees) 17.9 ± 1.4* 20.1 ± 4.2

Student t test was used (*p<0.05).

The patellar height measurements showed excellent levels of intra-rater reliability (ICC >0.75) for all situations and knee positions in both groups.

The mean of patellar height presented by both groups, at all knee flexion angles, OKC and CKC did not show values ​​greater than 1.5, indicating that both groups showed high patella during muscle contraction. Comparing patellar height between OKC and CKC exercises and between groups with and without pain, patellar height was not significantly different. (Table 4)

Table 4 Mean and standard deviation of Insall-Salvati index for control and PFD groups.  

Control Group PPS Group
Angle Rest OKC CKC Rest OKC CKC
15º 1,08 ± 0,11 1,19 ± 0,16a 1,18 ± 0,15b 1,07 ± 0,14 1,19 ± 0,15 1,22 ± 0,15b
30º 1,07 ± 0,15 1,21 ± 0,15a 1,19 ± 0,18b 1,09 ± 0,13 1,21 ± 0,17 1,21 ± 0,17
45º 1,13 ± 0,17 1,24 ± 0,19a 1,25 ± 0,21b 1,10 ± 0,19 1,19 ± 0,14 1,19 ± 0,16b

a significant difference between rest and maximal voluntary isometric contraction in OKC

b significant difference between rest and maximal voluntary isometric contraction in CKC

For the control group, the values ​​of patellar height showed significant differences between rest and MVIC in OKC and CKC at 15° (p<0.01), and between rest and MVIC in OKC and CKC at 30° and 45° (p<0.001). However, in PPS group, only CKC exercises at 15° and 45° knee flexion, significantly increased the patellar height compared to rest (p<0:01). (Table 4)

DISCUSSION

Anthropometric data analyzed characterize a homogeneous sample. However, when analyzing clinical parameters related directly or indirectly with the PPS, such as PPS questionnaire proposed by Kujala et al.13 and Q angle, considered a risk factor for onset of pain, there is significant difference between the groups analyzed, agreeing with the data observed in other studies14 , 15.

The values of patellar height obtained by clinically healthy subjects and subjects with PPS showed no significant differences, when analyzed in different positions of the knee and in open and closed kinetic chain. These results indicate that the proximal patellar displacement during contractions in OKC and CKC did not differ between individuals with and without pain. Likewise, Felicio et al. 9 observed no difference in patellar kinematics, when analyzing other data such as patellar tilt between individuals with PPS and control individuals.

Despite possible biomechanical changes resulting from the patella may predispose to the onset of pain,5 our results are in agreement with other studies that found no significant differences in patellar height between individuals with and without knee pain,14 , 16 , 17 which suggest that the patellar high is not a predisposing factor for PPS.17

Although our study disagree with the results of Kannus,18 which associates pattelar high with development of patellofemoral dysfunction, currently the literature suggests that the predisposing factors of PPS include local factors related to the patellofemoral joint, such as increased patellar tilt and patellar height; distal factors related to changes in the ankle joint and foot and proximal factors related to changes in ankle and foot joint; and proximal factors related to hip alterations,19 and that local factors may not predispose to PPS,20 especially in individuals who show no patellar instability, as the sample studied in this work.

The fact that the control group presented patellar height increased in rest at MVIC in OKC and CKC indicates that muscle contraction causes proximal displacement of the patella, which is significant when compare to rest regardless the type of exercise performed. Thus, we note that in subjects with no pain complaints, the patella moves superiorly similarly to contractions in OKC and CKC, and that both types of exercises do not lead to high patella.

The most proximal patellar displacement found only on CKC at 15° and 45° knee flexion in individuals with PPS contradicts our hypothesis. These data show that although the lateral patellar tilt and displacement were higher in OKC in early knee flexion,9 proximal patellar displacement in the sagittal plan does not follow the same pattern, with this larger shift in CKC. Considering only the patellar height, we suggest that the two types of exercises, OKC and CKC, may be indicated in the conservative treatment of athletes or non-athletes with PPS, since these individuals do not have high patella or complaint of pain during exercise. Moreover, these exercises are widely used during sports training of athletes without pain symptoms.

CONCLUSION

It should be considered in the completion of this work that, due to methodological limitations related to MRI equipment and the impossibility to use any metallic material in order to avoid distortions in images, control of the degree of effort through cell loads or dynamometers, was not performed during the period of the maximum effort.

Thus, according to the results of this study, it is concluded that patellar height is not a factor associated with the presence of PPS and it is suggested that both exercises are indicated since they do not promote significant proximal patellar dislocation in PPS patients.

REFERENCES

1. Lankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Middelkoop M. Factors associated with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(4):193-206. [ Links ]

2. Hirano A, Fukubayashi T, Ishii T, Ochiai N. Relationship between the patellar height and the disorder of the knee extensor mechanism in immature athletes. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(4):541-4. [ Links ]

3. Ivković A, Franić M, Bojanić I, Pećina M. Overuse injuries in female athletes. Croat Med J. 2007;48(6):767-78. [ Links ]

4. Cosca DD, Navazio F. Common problems in endurance athletes. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76(2):237-44. [ Links ]

5. Luyckx T, Didden K, Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Innocenti B, Bellemans J. Is there a biomechanical explanation for anterior knee pain in patients with patella alta?: influence of patellar height on patellofemoral contact force, contact area and contact pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(3):344-50. [ Links ]

6. Ward SR, Terk MR, Powers CM. Patella alta: association with patellofemoral alignment and changes in contact area during weight-bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(8):1749-55. [ Links ]

7. Cowan SM, Bennell KL, Crossley KM, Hodges PW, McConnell J. Physical therapy alters recruitment of the vasti in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(12):1879-85. [ Links ]

8. Powers CM, Ward SR, Fredericson M, Guillet M, Shellock FG. Patellofemoral kinematics during weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing knee extension in persons with lateral subluxation of the patella: a preliminary study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):677-85. [ Links ]

9. Felicio LR, Baffa Ado P, Liporacci RF, Saad MC, De Oliveira AS, Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Analysis of patellar stabilizers muscles nd patellar kinematics in anterior knee pain subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21(1):148-53. [ Links ]

10. Felicio LR, Saad MC, Liporaci RF, Baffa Ado P, Dos Santos AC, Bevilaqua-Grossi D. Evaluating patellar kinematics through magnetic resonance imaging during open- and closed-kinetic-chain exercises. J Sport Rehabil. 2010;19(1):1-11. [ Links ]

11. Insall J, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 1971;101(1):101-4. [ Links ]

12. Shabshin N, Schweitzer ME, Morrison WB, Parker L. MRI criteria for patella alta and baja. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33(8):445-50. [ Links ]

13. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):159-63. [ Links ]

14. Haim A, Yaniv M, Dekel S, Amir H. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: validity of clinical and radiological features. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:223-8. [ Links ]

15. Emami MJ, Ghahramani MH, Abdinejad F, Namazi H. Q-angle: an invaluable parameter for evaluation of anterior knee pain. Arch Iran Med. 2007;10(1):24-6. [ Links ]

16. Metin Cubuk S, Sindel M, Karaali K, Arslan AG, Akyildiz F, Ozkan O. Tibial tubercle position and patellar height as indicators of malalignment in women with anterior knee pain. Clin Anat. 2000;13(3):199-203. [ Links ]

17. Laprade J, Culham E. Radiographic measures in subjects who are asymptomatic and subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(414):172-82. [ Links ]

18. Kannus PA. Long patellar tendon: radiographic sign of patellofemoral pain syndrome--a prospective study. Radiology. 1992;185(3):859-63. [ Links ]

19. Davis IS, Powers CM. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: proximal, distal, and local factors, an international retreat. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(3):A1-16. [ Links ]

20. Nakagawa TH, Baldon Rde M, Muniz TB, Serrão FV. Relationship among eccentric hip and knee torques, symptom severity and functional capacity in females with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Ther Sport. 2011;12(3):133-9. [ Links ]

All the authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest referring to this article. Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

Received: December 05, 2012; Accepted: October 30, 2013

Correspondence: Débora Bevilaqua-Grossi. Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor System Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo. Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. deborabg@fmrp.usp.br

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.