Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES AT A TERTIARY ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA CENTER

PERFIL DE PACIENTES COM FRATURAS OSTEOPORÓTICAS NUM CENTRO TERCIÁRIO DE TRAUMA ORTOPÉDICO

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures treated at a tertiary orthopedic hospital.

Methods:

Using questionnaires, 70 patients with osteoporotic fractures (OF) were compared with 50 outpatients with multiple osteoarthritis (OA) followed through an outpatient clinic.

Results:

The OF group was older (p <0.001), less heavy (p=0.003), had lower BMI (p=0.006), was more likely to be white (p=0.011), was less likely to be married (p=0.008), and had previous falls, previous fractures, old fractures (>1 year), falls in the last 12 months, fractures due to falls, and needed more assistance (p<0.05). They also had lower Lawton & Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scores (p <0.05) and reported less lower limb disability, foot pathology, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, and vitamin D intake than patients in the OA group. White race, previous falls, and previous fractures increase the risk of osteoporotic fractures by 10.5, 11.4, and 4.1 times, respectively. The chance of fracture dropped 29% for each one-unit increase in Lawton & Brody IADL score. Married participants had fewer fractures than participants with other marital status.

Conclusion:

Together, race, marital status, previous falls, foot pathologies, previous fractures, and IADL scores define the profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures. Level of Evidence III; Case control study.

Keywords:
Osteoporotic fractures; Osteoporosis; Epidemiology; Diagnosis; Bone density; Prevalence.

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Avaliar o perfil dos pacientes com fraturas osteoporóticas atendidos em hospital de atendimento terciário ortopédico.

Métodos:

Setenta pacientes com fraturas osteoporóticas (FO) foram comparados a 50 pacientes com acompanhamento ambulatorial de osteoartrite (OA) por meio de questionários.

Resultados:

O grupo FO apresentou média de idade maior (p < 0,001), menor peso (p = 0,003), menor IMC (p = 0,006), maior frequência de pacientes brancos (p = 0,011), menor frequência de casados (p = 0,008), mais quedas prévias, fraturas prévias, fratura antiga (> 1 ano), queda nos últimos 12 meses, fratura por causa da queda e necessitam de mais auxílio (p < 0,05); menor Lawton e Brody AIVD (Atividades instrumentais da vida diária, p < 0,05), reportando menos deficiência de membros inferiores, patologia nos pés, fraqueza muscular, hipotireoidismo e consumo de vitamina D do que pacientes do grupo OA. Raça branca, quedas e fraturas prévias aumentam o risco de fraturas osteoporóticas em 10,5, 11,4 e 4,1 vezes respectivamente. A chance de fratura foi reduzida em 29% a cada aumento de uma unidade no Lawton e Brody AIVD. Casados fraturam menos que outros estados civis.

Conclusão:

Conjuntamente, a raça, estado civil, quedas prévias, patologias nos pés, fraturas prévias e AIVD definem o perfil dos pacientes com fraturas osteoporóticas deste centro. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo de caso-controle.

Descritores:
Fraturas por osteoporose; Osteoporose; Epidemiologia; Diagnóstico; Densidade óssea; Prevalência

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease characterized by progressive reduction of bone mass, leading to decreased bone strength and greater risk of fractures;11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73. it is considered a public health problem worldwide. It has been estimated that 9 million osteoporotic fractures occur each year, the equivalent of one fracture every 3.5 seconds.22 Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726-33. Although this is the most common bone disease,33 Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2004. many patients are not treated until the first fracture occurs. The Brazilian population is in the process of aging, as can be seen in the epidemiologic pyramids for the years 2017 and 2050.44 IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Projeção da população. [acesso em 2017 Jun 15]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/projecao_da_populacao/2008/piramide/piramide.shtm
http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/...
This aging is accompanied by an increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis and the incidence of falls and fractures.55 Amin S, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in fracture incidence: a population-based study over 20 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):581-9. These fractures are associated with increased mortality, decreased functional capacity and quality of life,66 Morin S, Lix LM, Azimaee M, Metge C, Caetano P, Leslie WD. Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(9):2439-48.

7 Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(10):1633-50.

8 Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2009;301(5):513-21.
-99 Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, et al. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ. 2009;181(5):265-71. and increased spending in the health system. It is estimated that approximately 50% of women and 20% of men 50 years of age or over will suffer an osteoporotic fracture during their lives.

Even though osteoporosis and osteopenia are a growing problem in older people, attempts to analyze the characteristics of osteoporotic patients in Brazil are rare.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the epidemiological profile of the population affected by osteoporotic fractures (fractures of the proximal femur, the proximal humerus, the distal radius, and the thoraco-lumbar spine) treated in a tertiary orthopedic hospital over a three-month period, with or without a previous diagnosis of osteopenia or osteoporosis, in an attempt to correlate the clinical characteristics present in patients treated for osteoarthritis during the same period.

Primary objective: To explore the epidemiological profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures treated in a tertiary orthopedic hospital, identifying factors potentially related to this fracture in relation to patients treated for osteoarthritis during the same period.

Secondary objective: To describe the types of osteoporotic fractures treated in a tertiary center, along with function and bone mineral density in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at the Osteo-Metabolic Diseases Group at the Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IOT-HC-FMUSP) with the approval of the institutional review board (number 76629217.3/0000.0068).

All participants were patients with osteoporotic fractures treated over a three-month period in 2017 and patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (of this group, only those treated in the osteometabolic disease group at a tertiary orthopedic hospital).

Inclusion criteria: Study group (osteoporotic fractures, OF): Patients above 45 years of age presenting any one or a combination of the following fractures: proximal femur, proximal humerus, distal radius, and thoraco-lumbar spine, with a mechanism of low-energy trauma. Patients with high-energy fractures were not included.

Control group (patients with osteoarthritis, OA): Patients above 45 years with clinical/radiographic diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee,1010 Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(8):1039-49. isolated or not, with and without comorbidities.

Exclusion criteria: Age below 45 years; suspicion or confirmation of pathological fractures; patient unwilling to participate.

Interventions

The participants filled out a questionnaire (Table 1) collecting data on demographic profile, fracture type, race, patient level of education, habits, personal history, previous fractures, level of physical activity, aids for locomotion, place and time of the accident which caused the fracture, use of medications and behavioral measures to treat osteoporosis, and functional assessment [Katz and Lawton and Brody].1111 Duarte YA, de Andrade CL, Lebrão ML. O índex de Katz na avaliação da funcionalidade dos idosos. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2007;41(2):317-25.,1212 Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment o folder people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-86. Patients with proximal femur fracture completed the Harris Hip Score (HSS)1313 Guimarães RP, Alves D, Azuaga TL, Ono NK, Honda E; Polesello GC, et al. Tradução e adaptação transcultural do "Harris Hip Score modificado por Byrd". Acta Ortop Bras. 2010;18(6):339-42. and fragility score (SHARE) questionnaires.

Table 1
Evaluation of post-osteoporotic fracture patients and controls.

Statistical analysis

Patient characteristics were described using absolute and relative frequencies according to groups for the qualitative variables, and association was verified using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Summary measures (mean and standard deviation or median, minimum, and maximum) were calculated according to groups for quantitative variables and the groups were compared using Student’s t-test or the Mann-Whitney test.

The unadjusted odds ratio was estimated for each variable to approximate the chance of osteoporosis with the respective intervals, with 95% confidence.

The multiple logistic regression model was used to explain the osteoporosis group, selecting the variables that showed statistical significance in the bivariate tests and using backward stepwise selection with a 5% criterion for entry and exit of the variables (p<0.05).

IBM SPSS for Windows software version 20.0 was used for these analyses, and Microsoft Excel 2003 was used to tabulate the data. The tests were performed at a 5% significance level.

RESULTS

The results of the questionnaires applied to 70 patients with osteoporotic fractures (OF) and 50 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee (or osteoarthritis of multiple joints including the knee) are summarized in Tables 2-4.

Table 2
Description of characteristics present in both groups and the results of unadjusted analyses.
Table 3
Result of the joint model describing the osteoporosis group according to evaluated variables.
Table 4
Description of characteristics that were evaluated only in patients with osteoporosis.

Table 2 shows that in isolation, patients with osteoporosis were statistically older on average (p<0.001), were less heavy and had lower BMI (p=0.003 and p=0.006, respectively), the frequency of white race was statistically higher in patients with osteoporosis (p=0.011), patients with osteoporotic fractures were statistically less likely to be married (p=0.008), and this group had more previous falls, previous fractures, old fractures (> 1 year), falls over the past 12 months, fractures from falls, and needed more assistance (p<0.05) than patients with OA. Patients with osteoporotic fractures reported less disability in the lower limbs, pathology in the feet, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, and vitamin D consumption than patients with OA. Using the functional scale by Lawton and Brody,1212 Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment o folder people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-86. their scores for instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were lower (p<0.05).

Table 3 shows that together, race, marital status, previous falls, pathologies in the feet, muscle weakness, hypothyroidism, previous fractures, and Lawton and Brody IADL score1212 Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment o folder people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-86. explained the patients with osteoporosis independent of the other characteristics we assessed (p<0.05). White patients were 10.48 times more likely to present osteoporosis than nonwhite patients, single patients and those with other marital status had a statistically greater chance of osteoporosis than married patients, patients who had previous falls were 11.39 times more likely to have osteoporosis than patients without previous falls, and patients with previous fractures were 4.13 times more likely to have osteoporosis than patients without previous fractures. Pathologies of the feet, muscle weakness, and hypothyroidism presented similar protections for osteoporosis, with the chance of osteoporosis approximately 86% less for each of these characteristics, and each one-unit increase in the Katz and Lawton IADL score1212 Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment o folder people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-86. decreased the chance of osteoporosis by 29%.

Table 4 shows the profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures treated in a tertiary trauma center, with an 81% incidence of patients with hip fractures, confirming that osteoporosis accompanies this fracture in mean bone densitometry values.

DISCUSSION

Osteoporosis is a chronic disease characterized by progressive decrease in bone mass, leading to decreased bone strength and greater risk of fractures.11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73. This disease can be characterized as primary or secondary. Primary osteoporosis can occur in both sexes at any age, but often occurs after menopause in women and later in men.11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73.

In this study we observed that the patients with osteoporotic fractures were older, a greater number were women (similar to the group with OA), weighed less, had lower BMI, and whites were more prevalent (Table 2), consistent with findings in other studies.11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73.,1414 Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35(2):375-82.,1515 Pinheiro MM, Reis Neto ET, Machado FS, Omura F, Szejnfeld J, Szejnfeld VL. Development and validation of a tool for identifying women with low bone mineral density and low-impact fractures: the São Paulo Osteoporosis Risk Index (SAPORI). Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):1371-9. Perhaps because of the size and characteristics of the sample (older adults, Caucasians, and hip fractures were more prevalent) (Tables 2, 3 and 4), consumption of glucocorticoids, and consumption alcohol and tobacco were not seen to have a large influence, as described in the literature,11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73.,1414 Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35(2):375-82.

15 Pinheiro MM, Reis Neto ET, Machado FS, Omura F, Szejnfeld J, Szejnfeld VL. Development and validation of a tool for identifying women with low bone mineral density and low-impact fractures: the São Paulo Osteoporosis Risk Index (SAPORI). Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):1371-9.
-1616 Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Czekajlo A, Grzeszczak W, Drozdzowska B. Influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in women in the RAC-OST-POL Study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32(1):89-95. but we found a protective relationship against osteoporotic fractures in married patients in relation to those with other marital status. (Tables 2 and 3) Pluskiewicz et al.1616 Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Czekajlo A, Grzeszczak W, Drozdzowska B. Influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in women in the RAC-OST-POL Study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32(1):89-95. reported a tendency for more fractures in widows.

Patients with osteoporosis presented more previous falls and more falls in the past 12 months, which together with the bone fragility caused by osteoporosis explains the higher incidence of fractures resulting from falls, old fractures (>1 year), and previous fractures. The higher number of falls can be partially explained by greater age and occasional sarcopenia in the OF group,11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73.,1515 Pinheiro MM, Reis Neto ET, Machado FS, Omura F, Szejnfeld J, Szejnfeld VL. Development and validation of a tool for identifying women with low bone mineral density and low-impact fractures: the São Paulo Osteoporosis Risk Index (SAPORI). Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):1371-9.,1717 Amin S, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in fracture incidence: a population-based study over 20 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):581-9. although these patients reported less disability of the lower limbs, feet pathologies, and muscle weakness than younger patients with OA. (Tables 2 and 3) This could be partially explained by patients with OA who receive outpatient care for arthritis of the knee (isolated or involving multiple joints) which includes an educational program and periodic evaluations of functionality, raising awareness among these patients of the functional loss and deformities they exhibit.1818 de Rezende MU, Hissadomi MI, de Campos GC, Frucchi R, Pailo AF, Pasqualin T, et al. One-Year Results of an Educational Program on Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial in Brazil. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016;7(2):86-94.,1919 Rezende MU, Frucchi R, Pailo AF, Campos GC, Pasqualin T, Hissadomi MI. PARQVE: Project Arthritis Recovering Quality of Life Through Education: two-year results. Acta Ortop Bras. 2017;25(1):18-24. This differs from the group receiving care for fracture, who still need to be assessed functionally and complete an educational program to develop awareness of what led to the osteoporotic fracture, the types of osteoporosis, the risks of their condition, and necessary treatment, along with consolidation of the fracture in question. Because a significant number of patients in the OF group did not report muscle weakness, muscle weakness was statistically indicated as a “protective factor” against osteoporotic fractures. (Tables 2 and 3) Muscle weakness was not assessed objectively. We believe that patients with fractures from fragility are not aware of muscle weakness, since these patients fall more often, have more previous fractures, and present lower scores for instrumental activities of daily living. (Tables 2 and 3) To explore this fact, a future prospective study in this group of patients will objectively explore muscle strength.

Lower vitamin D intake among the OF group in relation to the OA group associated with more previous fractures may indicate a failure in primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. As mentioned, the OA group was monitored by a multidisciplinary team for OA and comorbidities.99 Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, et al. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ. 2009;181(5):265-71.,1818 de Rezende MU, Hissadomi MI, de Campos GC, Frucchi R, Pailo AF, Pasqualin T, et al. One-Year Results of an Educational Program on Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial in Brazil. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016;7(2):86-94.

Secondary osteoporosis occurs when an underlying illness, disability, or drug causes osteoporosis. We failed to ask specifically about hyperthyroidism, and found that the OF group showed less hypothyroidism than the AO group, indirectly corroborating the fact that hyperthyroidism tends to be more frequently associated with osteoporosis, among the endocrine diseases.2020 Mann GB, Kang YC, Brand C, Ebeling PR, Miller JA. Secondary causes of low bone mass in patients with breast cancer: a need for greater vigilance. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3605-10.

Considering the surgical treatment that the hip fracture requires, in this tertiary center we found a much greater number of hip fractures than other fractures caused by osteoporosis (spine, wrist, and shoulder). (Table 4) However, the patients had densitometric osteoporosis and most did not take calcium replacement, vitamin D, or medication for osteoporosis, (Tables 2 and 4) showing the need for an educational program and multidisciplinary treatment for these patients which takes into account the financial, physical, and psychosocial problems that affect the individual, family, and community.11 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, race, marital status, previous falls, foot pathologies, previous fractures, and IADL scores define the profile of patients with osteoporotic fractures in this center.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study is part of a project that could not have been conducted without help from Paulo Dallari, Miriam Damaris Di Maio, TRB Pharma, Suellen Lima, Natalia Borges, and Marco Antônio Carvalho dos Santos.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7-29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J. 2001;94(6):569-73.
  • 2
    Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726-33.
  • 3
    Office of the Surgeon General (US). Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2004.
  • 4
    IBGE: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Projeção da população. [acesso em 2017 Jun 15]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/projecao_da_populacao/2008/piramide/piramide.shtm
    » http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/projecao_da_populacao/2008/piramide/piramide.shtm
  • 5
    Amin S, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in fracture incidence: a population-based study over 20 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):581-9.
  • 6
    Morin S, Lix LM, Azimaee M, Metge C, Caetano P, Leslie WD. Mortality rates after incident non-traumatic fractures in older men and women. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(9):2439-48.
  • 7
    Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(10):1633-50.
  • 8
    Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR. Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA. 2009;301(5):513-21.
  • 9
    Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, et al. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ. 2009;181(5):265-71.
  • 10
    Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29(8):1039-49.
  • 11
    Duarte YA, de Andrade CL, Lebrão ML. O índex de Katz na avaliação da funcionalidade dos idosos. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2007;41(2):317-25.
  • 12
    Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment o folder people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179-86.
  • 13
    Guimarães RP, Alves D, Azuaga TL, Ono NK, Honda E; Polesello GC, et al. Tradução e adaptação transcultural do "Harris Hip Score modificado por Byrd". Acta Ortop Bras. 2010;18(6):339-42.
  • 14
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, et al. A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone. 2004;35(2):375-82.
  • 15
    Pinheiro MM, Reis Neto ET, Machado FS, Omura F, Szejnfeld J, Szejnfeld VL. Development and validation of a tool for identifying women with low bone mineral density and low-impact fractures: the São Paulo Osteoporosis Risk Index (SAPORI). Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(4):1371-9.
  • 16
    Pluskiewicz W, Adamczyk P, Czekajlo A, Grzeszczak W, Drozdzowska B. Influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in women in the RAC-OST-POL Study. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32(1):89-95.
  • 17
    Amin S, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in fracture incidence: a population-based study over 20 years. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(3):581-9.
  • 18
    de Rezende MU, Hissadomi MI, de Campos GC, Frucchi R, Pailo AF, Pasqualin T, et al. One-Year Results of an Educational Program on Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial in Brazil. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016;7(2):86-94.
  • 19
    Rezende MU, Frucchi R, Pailo AF, Campos GC, Pasqualin T, Hissadomi MI. PARQVE: Project Arthritis Recovering Quality of Life Through Education: two-year results. Acta Ortop Bras. 2017;25(1):18-24.
  • 20
    Mann GB, Kang YC, Brand C, Ebeling PR, Miller JA. Secondary causes of low bone mass in patients with breast cancer: a need for greater vigilance. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3605-10.
  • 2
    Work conducted at the Osteometabolic Diseases Group, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Mar-Apr 2018

History

  • Received
    14 Sept 2017
  • Accepted
    15 Sept 2017
ATHA EDITORA Rua: Machado Bittencourt, 190, 4º andar - Vila Mariana - São Paulo Capital - CEP 04044-000, Telefone: 55-11-5087-9502 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actaortopedicabrasileira@uol.com.br