SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados




Links relacionados


Ambiente & Sociedade

versão impressa ISSN 1414-753Xversão On-line ISSN 1809-4422

Ambient. soc. vol.18 no.4 São Paulo out./dez. 2015 





2. Master's degree in Ecology at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Brazil. Research fellow of the National Institute of Amazonian Research (INPA). E-mail:

3. Professor of the Department of Ecology and Zoology at UFSC, Brazil. E-mail:


Understanding the relationship between local people and protected areas (PAs) is essential for improving the management of these areas. The local peoples' perspectives of their relationship with PAs were analyzed based on secondary data. We focused on five Federal Coastal-Marine PAs in the state of Santa Catarina and five analytical domains: economic, environmental, spatial, organizational and cultural. We analyzed 21 studies that together contemplated all domains. Fishing was the most important economic activity for local peoples. For all PAs, negative environmental impacts were registered. Conflicts in use of space, distance between local people and PAs management, and decline of fishing activity were also reported. The comparison of the analytical domains allowed us to identify gaps in the knowledge to be investigated and important points to be addressed by the managers of the PAs.

Key words: Literature review; local perceptions; protected area management; marine conservation


The creation of protected areas (PAs) impacts local people´s lives in numerous ways (MASCIA et al., 2010; KARANTH & NEPAL, 2012). Solutions that benefit both biodiversity conservation and the promotion of human welfare are difficult to find, because they usually involve complex tradeoffs and choices that result in losses and costs for stakeholders (MCSHANE et al., 2011). The inclusion of local people in management of PAs and conservation projects is a strategy to increase the acceptance of these areas (BROOKS et al., 2006; GERHARDINGER et al., 2009; KARANTH & NEPAL, 2012) and to improve compliance with PAs rules and regulations (ANDRADE & RHODES, 2012). To promote such inclusion it is crucial to understand the relationships among local people and PAs, which can be studied considering different domains of analysis (e.g. DAY et al., 2012; IBAMA, 2007; ICMBIO, 2012).

We analyzed the relationships among local people and five Federal Coastal-Marine PAs in the state of Santa Catarina from the people´s perspective and based on the literature. Research efforts focused on the Santa Catarina coast PAs are not recent (FABRIS, 1997; MADUREIRA, 1997; STRENZEL, 1997) nor scarce. Thus, we searched for studies that embraced the vision of local people about the influence of PAs in their lives, considering five analytical domains: economic, environmental, spatial, organizational and cultural.

Material and Methods

Study area

The State of Santa Catarina, southern Brazil, has 531 km of coastline, which is equivalent to 7% of the Brazilian coast (BRASIL, 2011a). This region lies in the Atlantic Forest domain, with different coastal formations, including mangroves, salt marshes, beaches, dunes, rocky shores, islands, estuaries, lagoons, bays, coves, creeks and ponds (BRASIL, 2011a). The PAs studied were: Right Whale Environmental Protection Area (Área de Proteção Ambiental da Baleia Franca/APABF) and Anhatomirim Environmental Protection Area (Área de Proteção Ambiental do Anhatomirim/APAA), both are category V in the IUCN classification system (IBAMA, 2004a); Pirajubaé Extractive Reserve (Reserva Extrativista Pirajubaé/REP), category VI (IBAMA, 2004a); Carijós Ecological Station (Estação Ecológica de Carijós/EEC) and Arvoredo Marine Biological Reserve (Reserva Biológica Marinha do Arvoredo/RBMA), which are category Ia (IBAMA, 2004a) (Figure 1). They form together a conservation mosaic with different categories of management, objectives and operating systems (Table 1).

Figure 1. Mosaic of Federal Coastal-Marine Protected Areas in the State of Santa Catarina, Southern, Brazil. APA = Environmental Protection Area; RESEX = Extractive Reserve; ESEC = Ecological Station; REBIO = Biological Reserve. ZA = Buffer zone. Source: ICMBio, 2014. 

Table 1. Description of Federal Coastal-Marine Protected Areas in the State of Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil.  

*PA = Protected Area; APAA = Anhatomirim Environmental Protection Area; APABF = Right Whale Environmental Protection Area; REP = Pirajubaé Extractive Reserve; EEC = Ecological Station Carijós; RBMA = Arvoredo Marine Biological Reserve.

There are numerous local groups with different ethnic and cultural characteristics along Santa Catarina coast. They include: Guarani Amerindian (ISA, 2012), "Quilombolas" (descendants of African slaves), and European descendants, mainly with Portuguese, German, Italian and Polish backgrounds (LEITE, 1991). One group that stands out is the Azorean, descendants of immigrants from the Azores and Madeira islands, and from mainland Portugal, who maintain their own cultural traits and generally practice fishing and small-scale agriculture (DIEGUES & ARRUDA, 2001). Tourist flows have intensified in the region since the 1970s, accelerating the process of urbanization, which has altered local livelihoods (PEREIRA, 2003). The coast is the main point of reference for people who immigrate to Santa Catarina, coming from the countryside, from other Brazilian regions and from abroad (TURNES, 2008).

Analytical domains

Based on the literature, consulting researchers and PAs' managers, we identified five analytical domains that cover different aspects of people/PA interactions: economic, environmental, spatial, organizational and cultural. The economic domain involves the influence of the PAs in the income generating activities of the local people. It encompasses activities such as tourism (ZUBE & BUSCH, 1990; SEKHAR, 2003; KISS, 2004; KARANTH & NEPAL, 2012), animal and plant extractivism, plant cultivation, and raising animals for sale or consumption (ZUBE & BUSCH, 1990; MASCIA et al., 2010; KARANTH & NEPAL, 2012; LELEU, 2012). The environmental domain refers to the awareness of the local people about the importance of the PAs for environmental quality, changes in the abundance and composition of species, and changes in the environments and landscapes (LELEU, 2012; RESSURREIÇÃO, 2012). This domain also covers environmental issues and potential conflicts between conservation and local activities. The spatial domain deals with the problems and issues related to territorial regularization, including the people's perceptions of the influence of the PAs in the use and occupation of the territory (ZUBE & BUSCH, 1990; LELEU, 2012). The organizational domain refers to the process of creation of the PAs, the performance of the managing agency in the communities, organization of the populations and their participation in the management of PAs (ZUBE & BUSCH, 1990; WELLS et al., 1992; BROOKS et al., 2006; GERHARDINGER et al., 2009; ANDRADE & RHODES, 2012; KARANTH & NEPAL, 2012). The cultural domain covers aspects such as the influence of PAs in the cultural activities of the populations, and their importance as a source of information, education and training of local people (RESSURREIÇÃO, 2012).

Documentary research

We searched for papers, monographs, dissertations and theses in the databases Scopus (, Scientific Electronic Library Online - SciELO ( and in the theses databank of the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - CAPES ( capesdw/), in January 2013. We used the fields "title", "keywords" and "abstract" to search for PAs names in Portuguese and in English. Additionally, the PA's own databases were accessed for other documents, such as technical reports, produced at the request of the managers themselves.

We selected the studies that fulfilled simultaneously three criteria: 1) contain information about social and environmental issues; 2) consider the perception and opinion of local people about the analytical domains; and 3) involve participatory methodologies, interviews or similar methods for data collection. For each study we systematized the following information: year of publication, authors, study type, title, journal/institution, PA, studied communities, accessed groups, number of informants, and the information related to each domain. Data were analyzed qualitatively, summarizing the description of each PA across the domains according to the perspective of the local people.

Results and discussion

Characterization of the studies

We found a total of 47 studies, of which 27 were Masters Dissertations, 14 journal articles, four Doctoral theses and two monographs (only professional undergraduate monographs were considered due to limitations of the CAPES database). Although dissertations were most numerous, this number may be underestimated, because the information in the CAPES database is provided by the post graduate programs, which often fail to update consistently. Only 11 of the 47 studies fulfilled the selection criteria, and eight could be obtained. The search performed directly in the PAs' databases added 13 studies. Thus, we analyzed 21 studies (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Distribution of the studies analyzed by Protected Area and according to study type. APAA = Anhatomirim Environmental Protection Area; APABF = Right Whale Environmental Protection Area; REP = Pirajubaé Extractive Reserve; EEC = Ecological Station Carijós; RBMA = Arvoredo Marine Biological Reserve. 

Access to the PAs' databases was essential to find studies that were not published in media with wider coverage or were unavailable in search systems. However, we emphasize that the PAs with management plans (EEC and RBMA) or more advanced in the creation process at the time of the survey (APAA) had more complete databases, since review of the studies about the PA is one of the steps of this document's preparation.

Contributions and limitations of the literature

The studies revealed that the topic of people/PA relationships is of interest to different areas of knowledge, as well as to the PAs' managers themselves. Together they covered all the analytical domains (Table 2). However, there are limitations to making comparisons among studies due to different methods of data collection, accessed groups and communities, and sampling effort. Furthermore, the process of scientific research, methodological choices and definition of objectives are closely related to the research questions (TONGCO, 2007) and to the area of knowledge and theoretical framework that supports them. Considering the choice of sampling method, for example, Bernard (2006) asserts that both individual data with probabilistic sampling and cultural data with intentional sampling are relevant for social sciences. Our sampled universe includes both studies of academic and technical natures, relating mainly to the social and biological sciences. All of them used non-probabilistic sampling - only the study by Bueloni (2012) used both sampling procedures.

Intentional or non-probabilistic sampling are useful in studies that aim to access more specific information or knowledge restricted to certain groups of people, or to local experts. When employing this approach it is essential to present the criteria for selection of informants, enabling other researchers to replicate the methodology and obtain comparable results (TONGCO, 2007), which also provides managers with greater detail to assist in decision making. In some studies we could not clearly identify such criteria nor the sampling effort (Table 2).

Two groups often accessed were the representatives and local leaders, especially the participants of the PAs' management councils. Among the 21 studies, 12 involved these informants (Table 2). The management council aims to facilitate and legitimize societal participation in the management of the PAs, with representatives from government agencies, civil society organizations, and, where applicable, representatives of the users of natural resources, the resident population and landowners of the PAs (BRASIL, 2011b). However, the presence of a given group on the council does not assure effective representation, which may be biased by representatives' individual opinions. Abramovay (2001) argues that council members may be selected by who is controlling the social life of the organization or the locality; thus, as occurs in various systems of representation, the councils are unlikely to encompass all local stakeholders. In addition, some systems can be designed to favor certain social groups. Morin (2001) analyzed the operation of four advisory councils of marine protected areas in the United States intended to assist the Secretary of Commerce and reported that these spaces are intended only for groups of resource users. Other groups which are also affected by decisions are excluded because they do not fit in predefined positions. In India and Nepal, the institutions for the management of natural resources, called participative, exclude women and reproduce other social arrangements where women are neglected (AGARWAL, 2001). In Brazil, Macedo (2008) observed that despite the managers' efforts to include different interests, the members of the council have on average greater income and more school years than other residents they represent in two Environmental Protection Areas councils, one of them being APABF.

Table 2. Description of studies analyzed about Federal Coastal-Marine Protected Areas of the State of Santa Catarina, Southern Brazil. 

*PA = Protected Area; APAA = Anhatomirim Environmental Protection Area; APABF = Right Whale Environmental Protection Area; REP = Pirajubaé Extractive Reserve; EEC = Ecological Station Carijós; RBMA = Arvoredo Marine Biological Reserve. **Domains: Eco = Economic; Env = Environmental; Spa = Spatial; Org = Organizational; Cul = Cultural. ***Forum of Agenda 21: created in 2003 is a space for discussions and interventions related to social and environmental issues of communities around the Ibiraquera Lagoon. ****CEPSUL: Centre for Research and Management of Fishery Resources in the Coastal Southeast and South is a government agency, focused on marine conservation.

Another limitation found refers to the communities included. Some PAs, such as APAA and REP, are better studied in terms of number of communities included in relation to all communities that each PA covers. The APABF, possibly due to its large size, is subsampled especially in its northern and southern regions. We emphasize that better spatial distributions of studies do not necessarily mean higher quality and more detail about the domains of analysis. The concentration of studies in a certain area can facilitate temporal diagnosis of the functioning of a PA. For example, also in APABF, the Imbituba and Garopaba communities have been studied since 2005 by one group at Santa Catarina Federal University. This region is considered by the group as a laboratory area, allowing greater temporal detailing of local issues, such as the use and management of communal resources, sustainable land management and conflicts (FABIANO, 2004; MACEDO, 2008; REBOUÇAS, 2008; ADRIANO, 2011). In this sense, we must consider the dynamic nature of people/PA relationships and these cannot be interpreted without observing temporal and spatial scales (ZUBE & BUSCH, 1990), which in turn are also sources of limitations for comparisons among studies. Considering all these limitations, the qualitative synthesis of the studies allows us to observe the different analytical domains, providing clues about people/PA relationships (Table 3).

Table 3. Qualitative synthesis of 21 studies about Federal Coastal-Marine Protected Areas in the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil, analyzed considering the perspective of local people and the domains: economic, environmental, spatial, organizational and cultural. The numbers indicate the references listed in  

APAA = Anhatomirim Environmental Protection Area; APABF = Right Whale Environmental Protection Area; REP = Pirajubaé Extractive Reserve; EEC = Ecological Station Carijós; RBMA = Arvoredo Marine Biological Reserve.

Within the economic domain, the influence of the presence of the PA in the income of the residents was mainly perceived in the practice of fishing activities in all areas (FABRIS, 1997; IBAMA, 2004b; VIVACQUA, 2005; INSTITUTO CARIJÓS, 2008; ARAÚJO, 2009; VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, 2010; ADRIANO, 2011; SPÍ-NOLA, 2011; MARTINS, 2012). Marine PAs contribute to the food security of fishermen using different fishing gears (MASCIA et al., 2010). In the studied areas, the link with fishing activities suggests their relevance for income and subsistence. However, we found that the continuation of these activities is compromised by factors such as the reduction of fish stocks due to environmental impacts and the devaluation of the fishermen, aspects present in environmental and cultural domains, respectively.

Relations with tourism were observed in APAA, APABF and RBMA. In APAA and APABF both positive and negative aspects from tourism were perceived by local people (FERREIRA et al., 2006; MACEDO, 2008; ARAÚJO, 2009). Kiss (2004) criticizes community-based ecotourism, due to its often limited contributions to conservation and local economies, involving few people and depending on external funding and support for long periods. In APAA the activities focused on tourism are concentrated in some communities, while others are only places of transit for visitors (ARAÚJO, 2009). In APABF there are reports of small returns from tourism for the inhabitants of the south-central region (MACEDO, 2008; BONETTI, 2011; BUELONI, 2012), with an incipient movement towards the development of community-based tourism (MACEDO, 2008). In RBMA, tourism is not significant in terms of income for the fishermen of Tijucas Bay (MARTINS, 2012), but we did not found studies that captured the local people´s opinion about the tourism in other communities around this PA, where this activity is more present.

In the economic domain we also identified the relations of local people with the main target species of conservation. In the region of APABF, the right whale (Eubalaena australis) is both a tourist attraction (FABIANO, 2004; MACEDO, 2008; REBOUÇAS, 2008; ADRIANO, 2011; BUELONI, 2012), and a potential economic threat to fishermen, by accidentally damaging fishing nets (BUELONI, 2012). Similarly, in APAA, the dolphin Sotalia guianensis is seen by local people both as important for tourism (FABRIS, 1997) and as detrimental to fishermen, by competing with them for fish (FLORIANI, 2005; ARAÚJO, 2009). On the other hand, considering the environmental domain, tourism and fishing have negative impacts for dolphins, with reports of dolphins' aversion reactions towards tourist boats (FERREIRA et al., 2006) and accidental deaths in fishing nets (FABRIS, 1997; FERREIRA et al., 2006).

Regarding the environmental domain, we detected other reports of loss or reduced populations of threatened species. In REP, the construction of a road was responsible for reducing the population of "berbigão" (Anomalocardia brasiliana), white shrimp (Litopenaeus schmitti) and pink shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), putting an end to fishing for shrimp in the area (VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, 2010; SPÍNOLA, 2011). In RBMA, there were reports by fishermen of the intensification of fishing in breeding areas, since they were forbidden to fish in the interior of the reserve area (IBAMA, 2004b; MARTINS, 2012). They also questioned the objectives and the management approach, not agreeing with the ban on fishing for transient fish, since they do not breed inside the reserve (IBAMA, 2004b). Disagreements with the laws concerning the conservation of species were also reported by fishermen in EEC, who do not agree with the area covered by the EEC because this PA does not protect the fish nurseries, thus not being effective for their conservation (INSTITUTO CARIJÓS, 2008). Perceptions of local residents reflect the acceptance of the PAs and also serve as tools to monitor their management (LELEU, 2012). The dissatisfaction with the design of the PA, the incoherence of the ban on fishing in certain areas (without a clear ecological function from fishermen's perspectives), the permission to use breeding areas, and the intensification of illegal fishing inside the PAs can be seen as reflections of the negligence of the local ecological knowledge in the formulation of management rules. Gerhardinger and colleagues (2009) point out that in Brazil the management of marine PAs continues to be guided solely by scientific knowledge, which is often incomplete even for major conservation targets. Local and scientific ecological knowledge should be seen as complementary in the process of managing these areas (LELEU, 2012).

Reports of environmental pollution caused by littering were also present in the environmental domain for APAA (FLORIANI, 2005) and EEC (MACHADO et al., 2004). The lack of basic sanitation and sewage treatment are common to all PAs (CORDEIRO, 2001; FABIANO, 2004; IBAMA, 2004b; MACHADO et al., 2004; FLORIANI, 2005; INSTITUTO CARIJÓS, 2008; ARAÚJO, 2009; VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, 2010; ADRIANO, 2011). Positive changes were reported for APABF, which were related to population increase of the right whale (BUELONI, 2012) and restocking of shrimp in the Ibiraquera Lagoon (FABIANO, 2004). The recognition by local people of the environmental importance of the PA for ecosystem protection was found in studies of REP (VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, 2010) and EEC (MACHADO et al., 2004; GUTIÉRREZ, 2008). Reports of environmental perceptions are important because they can serve as indicators of environmental benefits and weaknesses, corroborating measures adopted or pointing to priority demands for intervention. Social and environmental conditions can be considered deeply linked (ADAMS & HUTTON, 2007); thus investments in improving environmental quality produce direct impact on improving the local populations' quality of life. The lack of basic sanitation, identified for all PAs studied, indicates a priority demand towards the treatment of waste and sewer.

In the spatial domain we found information about land tenure regularization and dispossessions only for APAA (ARAÚJO, 2009). This information at first appears to be distorted because Environmental Protection Areas (category V by the IUCN classification system) are one of the most permissive categories in terms of space occupation. However, it is justified, due to the actions of the management agency of this PA in monitoring the compliance with more general environmental laws and regulations, including irregular occupancy in Permanent Preservation Areas.

Also in the spatial domain, we found reports of illegal occupations in all areas except REP. There were reports of restrictions on access to beaches in APAA (ARAÚJO, 2009), in APABF (FABIANO, 2004; ADRIANO, 2011) and around RBMA (IBAMA, 2004b).

These restrictions are criticized by residents who attribute the illegal occupation to the ineffectiveness of the management of the PAs, and usually question the spatial limits of the PAs. The need to improve the demarcation and to inform residents and fishermen about the limits of each PA was pointed out in APAA (ARAÚJO, 2009), EEC (CORDEIRO, 2001), and RBMA (IBAMA, 2004b; MARTINS, 2012). Allowing continuation of traditional practices and access to resources that only exist within PAs are ways that can produce more positive people/PA relationships (ZUBE & BUSCH, 1990). Restrictions generating conflicts in the use of marine space were reported in APABF (FABIANO, 2004; REBOUÇAS, 2008; MACEDO, 2008; ADRIANO, 2011) and RBMA (IBAMA, 2004b; VIVACQUA, 2005; MARTINS, 2012). These conflicts point to the need to promote discussions, to present the justifications for restrictions, and even the adequacy of norms and rules so that the rules are in fact enforced.

In the organizational domain, some studies report the occurrence of illegal practices and ineffective law enforcement inside and/or around APAA (FLORIANI, 2005; ARAÚJO, 2009), EEC (CORDEIRO, 2001; INSTITUTO CARIJÓS, 2008) and RBMA (VIVACQUA, 2005; MARTINS, 2012). The ignorance of laws, management plans, rules and responsibilities of the PA were identified in APAA (FLORIANI, 2005; FERREIRA et al., 2006) and EEC (CORDEIRO, 2001; GUTIÉRREZ, 2008). For all PAs, the information indicated a gap between local groups and the management of PAs (CORDEIRO, 2001; IBAMA, 2004b; VIVACQUA, 2005; REBOUÇAS, 2008; ARAÚJO, 2009; MEDEIROS, 2009; SPÍNOLA, 2011). These scenarios probably reflect the top-down creation and/or elaboration of PAs' rules. Even in REP, whose creation was promoted by local extractivists and which has a deliberative management council, there were reports of imposing decisions. The negligence of the rights of the extractivists to participate in the decisions about the construction of a road around the PA was an important event that contributed to distrust in the operation of REP (SPÍNOLA, 2011). It is important to consider that even though all PAs have management councils, local people do not always have representatives or are prepared to act in these spaces. Reports on difficulties of promoting strengthening of local groups were found in APABF (FABIANO, 2004; MACEDO, 2008; ADRIANO, 2011), REP (VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, 2010; SPÍNOLA, 2011) and RBMA (VIVACQUA, 2005). For APABF, the need to empower and increase participation of council members was also identified (MACEDO, 2008). The challenge of promoting more participatory management is enormous, requiring effort and political will from PAs managers and also from local groups.

In the cultural domain, only for REP was religious festivals mentioned, without a clear relation to natural resources, (VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, 2010). In the other studies, although there is some information about cultural festivities, these were derived from secondary data. Environmental education activities have been reported in APABF (MACEDO, 2008; ADRIANO, 2011), REP (SPÍNOLA, 2011), EEC (GUTIÉRREZ, 2008), and RBMA (IBAMA, 2004b), and were oriented to specific audiences. The need to perform these activities for the communities was mentioned for APAA (ARAÚJO, 2009) and EEC (CORDEIRO, 2001). Changes in cultural activities have been reported associated with fishing activity in all PAs (IBAMA, 2004b; INSTITUTO CARIJÓS, 2008; REBOUÇAS, 2008; ARAÚJO, 2009; VIZINHO & TOGNELLA-DE--ROSA, 2010; SPÍNOLA, 2011). These studies reported on the search by new generations for more profitable activities, also due to the lack of interest in teaching the traditional crafts and skills from older to younger generations. The reduction of the number of young fishermen is verified in Brazil at the national level (BRASIL, 2012). The depletion of fisheries and new job opportunities are factors that contribute to disinterest in fishing. In the region of APABF, Capellesso and Cazella (2011) pointed out that the decline of artisanal fishing activity is due to a reduction of resources and conflicts with industrial fishing. These conflicts are exacerbated by the lack of effective mechanisms for controlling access to fish resources (CAPELLESSO & CAZELLA, 2011), and when occurring within a PA they may be considered evidence of inefficient management and failure to meet the conservation objectives of these areas.


Comparisons of studies in Federal Coastal-Marine PAs of Santa Catarina allowed for the identification of gaps in academic knowledge, consonants points and particularities of the areas, showing demands for both the managers of the PAs (and their councils, where appropriate) and by researchers. Considering the analyzed domains, we suggest the following actions to improve the relationships between local populations and PAs: to expand basic sanitation services; to include the local ecological knowledge in the development of rules and management plan for PAs; to increase the participation of local groups in the management council of the PAs; to expand environmental education; to intensify the measures to protect artisanal fisheries.

We found that although different studies have addressed the relationship between the local population and the PAs, their access is limited because many are not published or are restricted to the PAs' databases. The contributions of the literature are not uniform, both among the five PAs, as within a given PA. Our study demonstrates that systematic analyzes involving secondary data need to be careful, because the studies are based on different theoretical frameworks, having different methodologies and have occurred at different time points; however, this analysis allow the construction of a general scenario.


ABRAMOVAY, R. Conselhos além dos limites. Estudos avançados, São Paulo, v. 15, n. 43, p. 121-140, set./dec. 2001. [ Links ]

ADAMS, W.M.; HUTTON, J. People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and society, v. 5, n. 2, p. 147-183, 2007. [ Links ]

ADRIANO, J. Rumo ao Ecodesenvolvimento na Zona Costeira Catarinense. Estudo de caso sobre a experiência do Fórum da Agenda 21 Local da Lagoa de Ibiraquera, no período de 2001 a 2010. 2011. 238 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia Política) - Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2011. [ Links ]

AGARWAL, B. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, v. 29, n. 10, p. 16231648, out. 2001. [ Links ]

ANDRADE, G.S.M.; RHODES, J.R. Protected areas and local communities: An inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology & Society, v. 17, n. 4, p. 591-606, dec. 2012. [ Links ]

ARAÚJO, G.P. Caracterização sociocultural da área de Proteção Ambiental do Anhatomirim. Florianópolis: Socioambiental, 2009. [ Links ]

BERNARD, H.R. Research Methods in Anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 4. ed. London: AltaMira Press, 2006. 803p. [ Links ]

BONETTI, T. Discutindo a gestão urbana de áreas costeiras: o caso do Farol de Santa Marta/Laguna - SC. 2011. 108 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Urbanismo, História e Arquitetura da Cidade) - Centro Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2011. [ Links ]

BRASIL a. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. Conservação da Biodiversidade na zona costeira e marinha de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, 2011. 34p. [ Links ]

BRASIL b. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. SNUC - Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza: Lei n. 9.985, de 18 de julho de 2000; Decreto n. 4.340, de 22 de agosto de 2002. Decreto n. 5.758, de 13 de abril de 2006. Brasília: MMA/SBF, 2011. 76p. [ Links ]

BRASIL. Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura. Boletim estatístico da pesca e aquicultura: Brasil 2010. 2012. 128 p. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 03/04/2013. [ Links ]

BROOKS, J.S. et al. Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation biology, v. 20, n. 5, p. 1528-1538, out. 2006. [ Links ]

BUELONI, F.S. Mudanças temporais na utilização da baleia franca, Eubalaena australis, pelas comunidades locais dos municípios de Imbituba e Garopaba, litoral sul de Santa Catarina, Brasil. 2012. 119 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia) - Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2012. [ Links ]

CAPELLESSO, A.J.; CAZELLA, A.A. Pesca artesanal entre crise econômica e problemas socioambientais: estudo de caso nos municípios de Garopaba e Imbituba (SC). Ambiente & Sociedade, São Paulo, v. 14, n. 2, p. 15-33, jul./dec. 2011. [ Links ]

CORDEIRO, A. Diagnóstico rápido participativo do entorno de Unidades de Conservação - DRPEUC: A experiência da Estação Ecológica de Carijós, Ilha de Santa Catarina - Brasil. Florianópolis: ESEC Carijós - IBAMA/SC, 2001. [ Links ]

DAMAZIO, R.M.A. Turismo, urbanização e preservação ambiental: conflitos produzidos a partir do processo de implantação de uma reserva extrativista entre os municípios de Garopaba e Imbituba. 2011. 156 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em História) - Faculdade de Educação, Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2011. [ Links ]

DAY, J. et al. Guidelines for applying the IUCN Protected Area Management Categories to Marine Protected Areas. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2012. 36p. [ Links ]

DIEGUES, A.C.S.; ARRUDA, R.S.V. (Org.). Saberes tradicionais e biodiversidade no Brasil. Brasília: MMA/NUPAUB, 2001. 176p. [ Links ]

FABIANO, R.B. Conflitos socioambientais e gestão integrada e sustentável de recursos pesqueiros. Estudo de caso sobre a atividade de carcinicultura na área da Lagoa de Ibiraquera (municípios de Imbituba e Garopaba, S.C.). 2004. 102 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia Política) - Departamento de Sociologia Política, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2004. [ Links ]

FABRIS, L.H.F. Baía dos Golfinhos. Subsídio para o Uso Sustentável dos Recursos Naturais em uma Unidade de Conservação de Uso Direto: um Enfoque Participativo. 1997. 97 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental) - Centro Tecnológico, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 1997. [ Links ]

FERREIRA, M.C.E.; HANAZAKI, N.; SIMÕES-LOPES, P.C. Os conflitos ambientais e a conservação do boto-cinza na visão da comunidade da Costeira da Armação, na APA de Anhatomirim, Sul do Brasil. Natureza & Conservação, São Carlos, v. 4, n. 1, p. 6474, abr. 2006. [ Links ]

FLORIANI, D.C. Situação atual e perspectivas da área de proteção ambiental do Anhatomirim - SC. 2005. 129 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia) - Departamento de Geociências, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2005. [ Links ]

GERHARDINGER, L.C.; GODOY, E.A.S.; JONES, P.J.S. Local ecological knowledge and the management of marine protected areas in Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management, v. 52, n. 3-4, p. 154-165, mar./abr. 2009. [ Links ]

GUTIÉRREZ, L.A.L. Unidades de conservação e inclusão social: do dualismo homem natureza ao caminho da gestão participativa na estação Ecológica Carijós. 2008. 138 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agroecossistemas) - Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2008. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS - IBAMA. a. Atlas de conservação da natureza brasileira: Unidades Federais. São Paulo: Metalivros, 2004. 355p. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS - IBAMA. b. Reserva Biológica Marinha do Arvoredo Encarte 2: Plano de manejo - Análise da região da UC. Florianópolis: MMA/IBAMA, 2004. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO BRASILEIRO DO MEIO AMBIENTE E DOS RECURSOS NATURAIS RENOVÁVEIS - IBAMA. Efetividade de gestão das unidades de conservação federais do Brasil. Brasília: IBAMA/WWF-Brasil, 2007. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO CARIJÓS. Implementação do Plano de Manejo da Estação Ecológica de Carijós - Projeto 066 (MA). Relatório da Meta 3.2. Elaborar um Plano de Ação Participativo para a Conservação dos recursos pesqueiros do Rio Ratones. Florianópolis, 2008. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE - ICMBio. Avaliação comparada das aplicações do método Rappam nas unidades de conservação federais, nos ciclos 2005-06 e 2010. Brasília: ICMBio/WWF-Brasil, 2012. 134 p. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE - ICM-Bio. Unidades de Conservação - Marinho. Disponível em: < portal/biodiversidade/unidades-de-conservacao/biomas-brasileiros/marinho/unidades-de-conservacao-marinho>. Acesso em: 02/03/2014. [ Links ]

INSTITUTO SOCIOAMBIENTAL - ISA. População indígena no Brasil. Disponível em: <>. Acesso em: 14/02/2012. [ Links ]

KARANTH, K.K.; NEPAL, S.K. Local residents perception of benefits and losses from protected areas in India and Nepal. Environmental Management, v. 49, n. 2, p. 372386, fev. 2012. [ Links ]

KISS, A. Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, v. 19, n. 5, p. 232-237, maio 2004. [ Links ]

LEITE, I.B. Descendentes de Africanos em Santa Catarina: invisibilidade histórica e segregação. Florianópolis: Núcleo de Estudos sobre identidade e relações interéticas/ UFSC, 1991. 42 p. (Textos e debates, n. 1, ano 1). [ Links ]

LELEU, K. et al. Fishers' perceptions as indicators of the performance of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Marine Policy, v. 36, n. 2, p. 414-422, março 2012. [ Links ]

MACEDO, H.S. Processos participativos na gestão de áreas protegidas: estudos de caso em unidades de conservação de uso sustentável da zona costeira do Sul do Brasil. 2008. 204 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia Política) - Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2008. [ Links ]

MACHADO, A.V.M. et al. Estudo multidisciplinar envolvendo o entorno da Estação Ecológica de Carijós. Florianópolis, 2004. [ Links ]

MADUREIRA, M.S.P. Educação Ambiental não formal nas unidades de conservação federais na zona costeira brasileira: uma análise crítica. 1997. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação Ambiental). Fundação Universidade Federal de Rio Grande, Rio Grande, 1997. [ Links ]

MARTINS, I.M. Conhecimento ecológico de pescadores artesanais sobre peixes de interesse comercial: contribuições para o manejo e conservação na Baía de Tijucas, SC. 2012. 116 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia) - Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2012. [ Links ]

MASCIA, M. B.; CLAUS, C.; NAIDOO, R. Impacts of marine protected areas on fishing communities. Conservation Biology, v. 24, n. 5, p. 1424-1429, out. 2010. [ Links ]

MCSHANE, T.O. et al. Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation, v. 144, n. 3, p. 966-972, mar. 2011. [ Links ]

MEDEIROS, R.P. Possibilidades e obstáculos à co-gestão adaptativa de sistemas pesqueiros artesanais: estudo de caso na área da Baía de Tijucas, litoral centro-norte do estado de Santa Catarina, no período de 2004 a 2008. 2009. 337 f. Tese (Doutorado em Sociologia Política) - Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2009. [ Links ]

MORIN, T. Sanctuary advisory councils: involving the public in the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Coastal Management, v. 29, n. 4, p. 327-339, out./dez. 2001. [ Links ]

PEREIRA, A. Formação sócio-espacial do litoral de Santa Catarina (Brasil): gênese e transformações recentes. Geosul, Florianópolis, v. 18, n. 35, p. 99-129, jan./ jun. 2003. [ Links ]

REBOUÇAS, G.N. Regimes de apropriação, usos e conflitos de uso do espaço marinho e seus recursos: estudo de caso no município de Garopaba, litoral centro-sul de Santa Catarina. 2008. 222 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sistemas Costeiros e Oceânicos) - Centro de Estudos do Mar, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Pontal do Paraná, 2008. [ Links ]

RESSURREIÇÃO, A. et al. Resident and expert opinions on marine related issues: Implications for the ecosystem approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, v. 69, p. 243-254, dez. 2012. [ Links ]

SEKHAR, N.U. Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of environmental Management, v. 69, n. 4, p. 339-347, dez. 2003. [ Links ]

SPÍNOLA, J.L. Participação e deliberação na RESEX Marinha do Pirajubaé (SC). 2011. 207 p. Tese (Doutorado em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento). Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2011. [ Links ]

STRENZEL, G.M.R. Programa de Monitoramento Ambiental da Reserva Ambiental Marinha do Arvoredo - Santa Catarina: Uma proposta Metodológica. 1997. 117 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Geografia) - Centro de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 1997. [ Links ]

TONGCO, M.D.C. Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, v. 5, p. 147-158, 2007. [ Links ]

TURNES, V.A. Reflexões sobre fluxos migratórios internos de populações no estado de Santa Catarina. Revista Brasileira de Gestão e Desenvolvimento Regional, Taubaté, v. 4, n. 1, p. 155-194, jan./abr. 2008. [ Links ]

VIVACQUA, M. Conflitos socioambientais no litoral de Santa Catarina: o caso da Reserva Biológica Marinha do Arvoredo. 2005. 112 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Sociologia Política) - Departamento de Sociologia Política, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2005. [ Links ]

VIZINHO, S.C.; TOGNELLA-DE-ROSA, M.M.P. Análise Sócio-econômica e Cultural da comunidade pesqueira do Pirajubaé (Baía Sul - Florianópolis - Santa Catarina - Brasil): Uma ferramenta para o Gerenciamento Costeiro Integrado. Gestão Costeira Integrada, n. 2, p. 1-9, 2010. [ Links ]

WELLS, M.; BRANDON, K.; HANNAH, L. People and Parks: Linking Protected Area Management with Local Communities. Washington: The World Bank/The World Wildlife Fund/U.S. Agency for International Development, 1992. 99p. [ Links ]

ZUBE, E.H.; BUSCH, M.L. Park-people relationships: an international review. Landscape and Urban Planning, Amsterdam, v. 19, n. 2, p. 117-131, maio 1990. [ Links ]

1 . We thank the managers of the Federal Coastal-Marine Protected Areas of Santa Catarina for allowing the access to their databases; to the researcher Charles Roland Clement (National Institute of Amazonian Research - INPA) for reviewing the English version of this article; to Rufford Small Grants for the financial support; RPA thanks INPA PCI/MCTI for a research fellowship; NH thanks to CNPq for the research productivity scholarship (306478/2012-9)

Received: March 10, 2014; Accepted: March 23, 2015

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo do artigo, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons