## Services on Demand

## Journal

## Article

## Indicators

## Related links

## Share

## Genetics and Molecular Biology

##
*Print version* ISSN 1415-4757*On-line version* ISSN 1678-4685

### Genet. Mol. Biol. vol.22 n.3 São Paulo Sept. 1999

#### http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47571999000300027

**Methodology **

**Association between Griffing's diallel and the adaptability and stability of Eberhart and Russel***

**Cleso Antônio Patto Pacheco ^{1}, Cosme Damião Cruz^{2} and Manoel Xavier dos Santos^{3}**

**Part of a thesis presented by C.A.P.P. to the Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctoral degree. ^{1}Embrapa/CNPMS, Caixa Postal 151, 35701-970 Sete Lagoas, MG, Brasil. Send correspondence to C.A.P.P. E-mail: cleso@cmpms.embrapa.br ^{2}Universidade Federal de Viçosa, DBG, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brasil.*

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present work was to provide a methodology to study the inheritance of adaptability and stability through the breakdown of Eberhart and Russell regression coefficients and regression deviations in effects due to the mean and additive genetic effects (g_{i's }and g_{j's}) as well as dominance effects (s_{ij's}) of Griffing´s methodology, when the diallel is conducted in several environments. It was concluded that the adaptability and stability parameters are determined in the same manner as are genetic effects. So an F1 cross inherits half the general combining ability (GCA) mean effect from each parent, while the effects due to specific combining ability (SCA) are subjected to the same considerations relative to s_{ij's}, i.e., they are dependent on specific combinations.

INTRODUCTION

One of the most useful techniques in plant breeding is the analysis of diallel crosses, which is a scheme of crosses where each individual is crossed with the remaining individuals. These crosses result in two types of offspring, half and full sibs. Therefore, the breeder can infer the predominant type of gene action, additive or non-additive, and select the parents for an intra- or interpopulational breeding program.

Sprague and Tatum (1942) called the additive portion of genotypic variance "general combining ability" (GCA), determined by mean hybrid performance of a determined line. The non-additive portion was the "specific combining ability" (SCA), a measure for cases where some hybrid combinations are better, or worse, than expected based on mean performance of the lines evaluated.

Among the methods available for diallel analysis, Griffing's method 2 (1956) for the diallel formed by p parental and their p(p-1)/2 F1's, totaling n = p(p+1)/2 treatments considered of fixed line effects (model 1), has been one of the most frequently used. The statistical model is:

(i)

where,

Y_{ij} = mean value of parental (i = j) or hybrid combination (i ¹ j) with i and j = 1, 2, . . . , p;

m = general mean;

g_{i}, g_{j} = GCA effects of i-th and j-th parent;

s_{ij} = SCA effect of the cross among the i-th and j-th parents, with s_{ij} = s_{ji};

= mean experimental error.

However, the selection of parents based on a single environment may lead to unsatisfactory results for farmers who are in a region different from that where the cultivar was developed, due to genotype x environment interaction effects.

When a diallel is performed in a series of environments, the genotype x environment evaluation of effects in phenotypic characteristics is possible. In this situation, the model (i) becomes:

. (ii)

where the subscript k refers to the k-th environment where the diallel is performed.

The method of Eberhart and Russell (1966) used to study the genotype x environment interaction and the phenotypic adaptability and stability, based on simple regression analysis, is also widely used because of its simplicity and efficiency, as shown by several authors working with various crops (Oliveira, 1976; Gama and Hallauer, 1980; Miranda, 1993; Gonçalves, 1997; Vendruscolo, 1997). The model, considering data from one diallel, is:

(iii)

where,

Y_{ijk} = the dependent variable, which refers to the genotype observation originated by crossing i-th and j-th parents in the k-th environment;

X_{k} = the independent variable, referring to the k-th environmental value.

It can be demonstrated that:

where,

b_{1ij} = the linear regression coefficient, a relationship of the covariance of the dependent variable with the independent variable and the variance of the environment values; when the magnitude of b_{1ij} is higher, lower or equal to 1.0 a treatment can be considered as favorably, unfavorably or generally adapted to environments, respectively;

b_{0ij} = the intercept or the point where the straight line crosses the Y axis;

d_{ijk} = the deviation of regression;

= the mean experimental error.

Eberhart and Russell (1966) proposed the use of regression deviation to measure production stability. If the regression deviations are null, the cultivar has a predictable behavior. As it is not possible to know the real environmental value, this methodology adopts an environmental index (I_{k}), estimated for each environment by the following expression:

where the X_{k} term is represented by the mean, in the k-th environment, of the evaluated genotypes, or ,

where possible genotypes, evaluated by method 2, model 1, in the diallel analysis from Griffing (1956).

On the other hand, a gap in quantitative genetics about the genetic control of adaptability and stability exists. A relatively large number of papers reporte that the factors which determine adaptability and stability are genetically controlled (Gama and Hallauer, 1980; Torres, 1988; Vencovsky and Barriga, 1992). However, evidence such as that of Torres (1988), that genetic control of adaptability is independent of yield, is scarce and does not explain how these parameters are inherited.

Recently, several authors (Naspolini Filho* et al.*, 1981; Gama *et al.*, 1984; Lopes *et al.*, 1985; Eleutério *et al*., 1988, Parentoni *et al*., 1990, Santos *et al.*, 1994 and Pérez-*Velásquez et al.*, 1995), concerned with genotype x environment interaction in their breeding programs, have used the diallel under different environmental conditions. However, their methodology does not allow study of the adaptability of the estimated genetic effects. They had to restrict themselves to detecting the existence of interaction of these effects with the environments and recommending their materials based on the mean effects, according to the wide adaptability of these materials.

This study was carried out to develop a methodology for inheritance studies of adaptability and stability of production by an association of diallel analysis methodology (Griffing, 1956) with adaptability and stability analysis (Eberhart and Russell, 1966). The proposed methodology was then used in a diallel cross among maize populations assessed in a number of environments.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Applying the two mathematical models described in the introduction ((ii) and (iii)) for data obtained from replicated diallels from several environments, it can be seen that although they lead to completely different results they originated from the same phenotypic observationY_{ijk}, where the indices i and j refer to parents involved in the diallel cross and the index k refers to the environment where the diallel was carried out. Then, considering that the Eberhart and Russell (1966) model is based on simple linear regression and, further, that the genetic effects estimated by method 2, model 1, by Griffing (1956) are additive, a new model may result from the association of the two previous:

Y_{ijk} = m_{k} + g_{ik} + g_{jk} + s_{ijk} + =

= b_{0ij} + b_{1ij} I_{k} + d_{ijk} + . (iv)

It may be used by focusing on multiple linear regression.

Assuming one diallel with **p** parents (i = j = 1,. . ., p) and its p(p -1)/2 F1 crosses, assessed in **a** environments (k = 1, . . .,a), and using matrix form, the model (iv) becomes Y = Xb + r for each ij, where Y is a matrix (a x 4) of the genetic effects estimated by Griffing's methodology, relative to the ij genotype in several environments; X is an (a x 2) matrix where 2 is the number of parameters to be estimated; b is a (2 x 4) matrix whose elements are established by partitioning the parameters to be estimated; and r is an (a x 4) error matrix. Thus:

The b matrix is estimated by the normal equation system in the following way:

where,

The matrices for the sum of squares (SS) of several environments with the same genotype (SSA/G), the regression (SSReg) and the regression deviations (SSDev) are also obtained by the least squares method. The simplest way to express the decomposition of regression deviations due to genetic effects from Griffing's model was by relationship between the deviation means squares (MSD) of the regression with the residual mean squares (MSR), as an F-test decomposition:

However, the decomposition parts do not associate with any probabilistic function.

Yield data (kg/ha) from 28 maize populations and their 378 diallel crosses assessed in 10 environments (Pacheco, 1997) were used as an example.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Diallel crosses in each environment and pooled together gave significant values for GCA and SCA effects and their interaction with the environments. The GCA/SCA ratio (0.871) showed that the effects of the deviations due to dominance predominated over the additive.

The proposed methodology allows the study of the adaptability and stability of the genetic effects estimated by Griffing's (1956) methodology, using a partitioning of Eberhart and Russell's (1966) parameters and observations from the diallel experiments carried out in several environments; however, the interpretation of the results should be made using both methodologies.

The data from six populations are shown as an illustration.

There are seven more columns in Table I than would be expected by simply joining the two methodologies; three refer to the partitioning of the total regression coefficient (b_{1t}), and the other four express the deviation from the regression of the genetic effects compared with the mean square of the residual.

When the data (Table I) are analyzed, the most important point is that the adaptability and stability parameters are subjected to the same rules that govern the inheritance of quantitative traits. Therefore, in the absence of dominance and epistatic effects, as an F1 cross inherits half the additive effects from each parent, the behavior of the sibs would be completely predictable from the parents' behavior. If it were not for the effects of specific combination, the ideal cross could be predicted among the two parents which had at the same time the highest g_{i's} and the lowest b_{1gi's} and regression deviations.

A negative b_{1sii} means that as the environmental effects increased, the s_{ii} parameter decreased. In this case, however, a large, negative s_{ii} is desirable because it is associated with deviation due to positive dominance. A positive b_{1sii} is of no interest to breeders. The genetic interpretation of s_{ii }parameter (the SCA of parent i with itself) was given by Cruz and Vencovsky (1989). They showed that this parameter is indicative for unidirectional dominance and for varietal heterosis, being represented by the magnitude of the analysis and through the s_{ii} estimated signs. Therefore, negative values of s_{ii} are associated with positive deviations due to dominance and the magnitude value is indicative of the varietal heterosis or indicative of the population genetic divergence in relation to the diallel mean. It was demonstrated by Cruz and Vencovsky (1989) that the summation of the s_{ii} is a linear function of the mean heterosis.

The deviations due to dominance were responsible for the slight tendency, b_{1t }= 0.89, of BR-106 to adapt to unfavorable environments (Table I).

The BR-105 variety had an s_{ii} mean of -7.26, which leaves it with one of the lowest genetic divergences compared with the other assessed populations. This low genetic divergence means low positive deviations due to dominance, since only the CMS-15 population presented an s_{ii} positive mean of 299.00 and was, therefore, the only one with deviation due to negative dominance.

The partitioning of b_{1t} for BR-105 showed that its s_{ii's} increased (became less negative) in the same direction as the environmental effects, indicating that its deviation due to dominance decreased from the worst to the best environment, in an inverse behavior to that found for BR-106 (Figures 1 and 2). The effect of the genetic parameters in the slope of the straight line, considering the full model (m + 2g_{i} + s_{ii}) proposed by Griffing (1956), can be better understood when compared with the representative lines of the partial models, separately considering the effects of the GCA (m + 2g_{i}) and SCA (m + s_{ii}), lines 2 and 3, respectively.

**Figure 1** - Simple linear regression for adaptability of the BR-105 population to the 10 assessed environments. Estimate of m + 2g_{i} + s_{ii} (straight line 1, with b_{1} = 1.2263), according to Eberhart and Russell (1966) and its partitioning using Griffing's (1956) genetic effects: m + 2g_{i} (line 2, b_{1} =1.1448), m + s_{ii} (line 3, b_{1} = -1.0816) and m (line 4, b_{1} = 1.0000).

**Figure 2** - Simple linear regression for adaptability of the BR-106 population to the 10 assessed environments. Estimate of m + 2g_{i }+ s_{ii} (straight line 1, with b_{1} = 0.8909), according to Eberhart and Russell (1966) and its partitioning using Griffing's (1956) genetic effects: m + 2g_{i} (line 2, b_{1} = 1.2746), m + s_{ii} (line 3, b_{1} = 0.6163) and m (line 4, b_{1} = 1.0000).

The negative or positive slopes can be determined by comparing the angles formed between the X axis (environmental indices) and the first three lines with the angle formed between line 4 and the X axis, that represents the regression of the general means (m) with the environmental indices. This genetic parameter will be positive when the slope of the straight line becomes greater than the straight line 4, or negative when the slope becomes shorter.

The magnitudes from the effects of the GCA and SCA give an idea of the contribution of the additive and non-additive effects to the adaptability of the material evaluated, while the positive or negative signs showed if the effects increased or decreased in the same direction as the environmental variation stimulus.

In this way, the b_{1t} decompositions indicate, for example, that for the BR-105 x CMS-14C cross, the average SCA, besides being negative (b_{0sij} = -632.96), results from estimates that showed decreasing behavior (b_{1sij} = -0.0184) while the environmental stimulus was increasing. On the other hand, the CMS-14C x BA III Tuson cross also showed a negative genetic complementation (b_{0sij} = -134.63), but increased in the same direction as the environmental stimulus (b_{1sij} = 0.1592).

Eberhart and Russell's (1966) ideal genotype can now be defined as that with a high general mean due to the high g_{i's} effects, and further, having b_{1t} = 1.0, due to b_{1gi} = b_{1gj} = b_{1sij}. Genotypes with regression deviations equal or close to zero were not found, even considering all the treatments.

Observing the F-values (Table I) for the mean squares of the regression deviations as well as the decompositions to genetic effects and double products, a strong influence was noted from the portion of the regression deviations associated with SCA.

Considering all 28 maize populations and their 378 diallel crosses (data not shown), it was observed that, although the regression deviations due to SCA and due to double products were the strongest factors of production instability, the combination of the small deviations of all effects was responsible for the significance in the remaining 45.37% of the treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

This new methodology allowed inferences on adaptability and stability of the GCA and SCA, providing an excellent alternative for presenting results of diallel analyses carried out in several environments.

Adaptability and stability parameters are subjected to the same rules which control inheritance of quantitative traits. In the absence of dominance effects, the behavior of the sibs would be completely predictable from the parents' behavior. If it were not for the specific combination effects, the ideal cross could be predicted among the parents which joined, at the same time, the greatest g_{i's} and the lowest b_{1gi's} and regression deviations.

RESUMO

Este trabalho teve por objetivo estudar a herança da adaptabilidade e estabilidade através do desdobramento dos coeficientes de regressão e dos desvios da regressão de Eberhart e Russell em efeitos devidos à média e aos efeitos genéticos aditivos (g_{i's} e g_{j's}) e devidos à dominância (s_{ij's}) da metodologia de Griffing, quando um dialelo é conduzido numa série de ambientes. Concluiu-se que os parâmetros de adaptabilidade e estabilidade são determinados da mesma maneira que os efeitos genéticos, de modo que um F1 recebe metade do efeito médio da capacidade geral de combinação (CGA) de cada um de seus pais, permanecendo as partes devidas à capacidade específica de combinação (SCA) sujeitas às mesmas considerações pertinentes aos s_{ij's}, ou seja, são dependentes das combinações específicas médias.

REFERENCES

**Cruz, C.D. **and** Vencovsky, R.** (1989). Comparação de alguns métodos de análise dialélica. *Rev. Bras. Genét. 12*: 425-438. [ Links ]

**Eberhart, S.A.** and **Russell, W.A.** (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. *Crop Sci.* *6*: 36-40. [ Links ]

**Eleutério, A., Gama, E.E.G. **and** Morais, A.R.** (1988). Capacidade de combinação e heterose em híbridos intervarietais de milho adaptados às condições de cerrado. *Pesq. Agrop. Bras.* *23*: 247-253. [ Links ]

**Gama, E.E.G. **and **Hallauer, A.R.** (1980). Stability of hybrids produced from selected and unselected lines of maize. *Crop Sci. 20*: 623-626. [ Links ]

**Gama, E.E.G., Vianna, R.T., Naspolini Filho, V. **and** Magnavaca, R.** (1984). Heterosis for four characters in nineteen populations of maize (*Zea mays *L.). *Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol.* *13*: 69-80. [ Links ]

**Gonçalves, F.M.A.** (1997). Adaptabilidade e estabilidade de cultivares de milho avaliadas em safrinha no período de 1993 a 1995. M.Sc. thesis, UFLA, Lavras, MG. [ Links ]

**Griffing, B.A.** (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. *Austr. J. Biol. Sci.* *9*: 463-493. [ Links ]

**Lopes, M.A., Gama, E.E.G., Vianna, R.T.** and** Souza, I.R.P.** (1985). Heterose e capacidade de combinação para produção de espigas em cruzamentos dialélicos de seis variedades de milho. *Pesq. Agrop. Bras.* *20*: 349-354. [ Links ]

**Miranda, G.V.** (1993). Comparação de métodos de avaliação da adaptabilidade e estabilidade de comportamento de cultivares de feijão (*Phaseolus vulgaris *L.). M.Sc. thesis, UFV, Viçosa, MG. [ Links ]

**Naspolini Filho, V., Gama, E.E.G., Vianna, R.T.** and **Môro, J.R. **(1981). General and specific combining ability for yield in a diallel cross among 18 maize populations (*Zea mays* L.). *Rev. Bras. Genét.* *IV*: 571-577. [ Links ]

**Oliveira, A.C.** (1976). Comparação de alguns métodos de determinação de estabilidade em plantas cultivadas. M.Sc. thesis, UNB, Brasília, DF. [ Links ]

**Pacheco, C.A.P.** (1997). Associação das metodologias de análise dialélica de Griffing e de análise de adaptabilidade e de estabilidade de Eberhart e Russell. Ph.D. thesis, UFV, Viçosa, MG. [ Links ]

**Parentoni, S.N., Santos, M.X., Magnavaca, R., Gama, E.E.G., Pacheco, C.A.P. **and **Lopes, M.A. **(1990). Productividad y heterosis en cruzamientos dialélicos de diez poblaciones precoces de maiz. In:* XIII Reunión de Maiceros de la zona Andína. Chyclaio.* Peru, pp. 33-48. [ Links ]

**Pérez-Velásquez, J.C., Ceballos, H., Pandey, S. **and **Díaz-Amaries, C. **(1995). Analysis of diallel crosses among Colombian landraces and improved populations of maize. *Crop Sci.* *35*: 572-578. [ Links ]

**Santos, M.X., Pacheco, C.A.P., Guimarães, P.E.O., Gama, E.E.G., Silva, A.E. **and **Oliveira, A.C. **(1994). Diallel among twenty-eight varieties of maize*. Rev. Bras. Genét.* *17*: 277-282. [ Links ]

**Sprague, G.F. **and** Tatum, L.A.** (1942). General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. *J. Am. Soc. Agron.* *34*: 923-932. [ Links ]

**Torres, R.A.A.** (1988). *Estudo do controle genético da estabilidade fenotípica de cultivares de milho (Zea mays *L.*).* Ph.D. thesis, ESALQ-USP, Piracicaba, SP. [ Links ]

**Vencovsky, R. **and **Barriga, P.** (1992). *Genética Biométrica no Fitomelhoramento*. SBG, Ribeirão Preto, SP, pp. 496. [ Links ]

**Vendruscolo, E.C.G.** (1997). Comparação de métodos e avaliação da adaptabilidade e estabilidade de genótipos de milho-pipoca (*Zea mays* L.) na região Centro-Sul do Brasil. M.Sc. thesis, UEM, Maringá, PR. [ Links ]

**(Received December 30, 1997) **