Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Biometrical analyses of linolenic acid content of soybean seeds

Abstract

The genetic reduction of linolenic acid levels increases the quality and stability of soybean oil. The objective of this study was to determine the inheritance and evaluate the nature and magnitude of gene effects on soybean seed linolenic acid level. Means and variances of F1, F2, and F3 generations were made from the cross between accession BARC-12 (low linolenic acid content) and the commercial Brazilian cultivar CAC-1 (normal linolenic acid content). The results demonstrated that linolenic acid content in soybean is under the genetic control of a small number of genes. The additive model explained the means for the three generations and for the parents. Non-allelic gene interactions had little effect on the determination of genotypic values for the individuals. The generation means and population variation analyses demonstrated that the dominance deviations contribute little to the trait. These results showed that backcross breeding programs can be used to introduce the low linolenic acid content trait into soybean seeds, since it is possible to identify with very high accuracy the desired genotypes in segregating populations.

soybean oil composition; linolenic acid content; biometrical analyses


RESEARCH ARTICLE

Biometrical analyses of linolenic acid content of soybean seeds

Abelmon da Silva GesteiraI; Ivan SchusterI; Inês Chamel JoséI; Newton Deniz PiovesanI; José Marcelo Soriano VianaII; Everaldo Gonçalves de BarrosI, II; Maurilio Alves MoreiraI, III

IInstituto de Biotecnologia Aplicada à Agropecuária (BIOAGRO), Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil

IIDepartamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil

IIIDepartamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil

Correspondence Correspondence to Maurilio Alves Moreira Instituto de Biotecnologia Aplicada à Agropecuária (BIOAGRO), Universidade Federal de Viçosa 36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil E-mail: moreira@ufv.br

ABSTRACT

The genetic reduction of linolenic acid levels increases the quality and stability of soybean oil. The objective of this study was to determine the inheritance and evaluate the nature and magnitude of gene effects on soybean seed linolenic acid level. Means and variances of F1, F2, and F3 generations were made from the cross between accession BARC-12 (low linolenic acid content) and the commercial Brazilian cultivar CAC-1 (normal linolenic acid content). The results demonstrated that linolenic acid content in soybean is under the genetic control of a small number of genes. The additive model explained the means for the three generations and for the parents. Non-allelic gene interactions had little effect on the determination of genotypic values for the individuals. The generation means and population variation analyses demonstrated that the dominance deviations contribute little to the trait. These results showed that backcross breeding programs can be used to introduce the low linolenic acid content trait into soybean seeds, since it is possible to identify with very high accuracy the desired genotypes in segregating populations.

Key words: soybean oil composition, linolenic acid content, biometrical analyses.

Introduction

Soybean oil is considered to be of low processing cost. However, for soybean oil to become more competitive, some nutritional and functional traits must be genetically improved compared to other edible oils (Yadav, 1996). The functional and nutritional value of vegetable oils can be dictated by their fatty acid composition. Linolenic acid, with three double bonds, is extremely susceptible to oxidation. According to Neff et al. (1992), there is a positive correlation (r = 0.81) between the rate of peroxide formation and the number of double bonds present in the fatty acid molecule. There is also a negative correlation (r = -0.89) between linolenic acid content and oil flavor (Liu and White, 1992). Therefore, hydrogenation of soybean oil has been used to chemically reduce the level of linolenic acid to about 2% in order to increase oil oxidative stability. Nevertheless, the chemical process is costly and the selective hydrogenation of linoleic and linolenic acids is not totally under control (Yadav, 1996). The reduction of linolenic acid content via breeding is the most effective way to improve soybean oil quality. Inheritance studies and genetic parameter estimation are extremely valuable for establishing breeding strategies to alter fatty acid content in soybean oil.

BARC-12 is a low linolenic acid (3%) line obtained by Leffel (1994) by crossing and selecting the two full-sib lines N85-2176 and N85-2124. These two lines were selected by Burton et al. (1989) in the cross N78-2245 with PI 123440, both with low linolenic acid content. BARC-12 displays significantly lower linolenic acid compared to its progenitors (N85-2176 and N85-2124) and lines A5, C1640, and N85-2131, which also have low linolenic acid contents.

Heritability is considered to be one of the most important genetic parameters of the population under selection. Narrow sense heritability expresses the proportion of the total variance that can be attributed to the average gene effects. An important function of the heritability parameter is its predictive role, expressing the degree of correspondence between the phenotypic and genotypic values (Falconer and Mackay, 1997). Heritability is not restricted to the trait itself but is also related to the population and environmental conditions to which the plants have been submitted (Falconer and Mackay, 1997).

The objectives of this work were to analyse the inheritance of linolenic acid content and to evaluate the nature and magnitude of the gene effects which control this trait in soybean seeds.

Material and Methods

Genetic material and crosses

Accession BARC-12, with less than 30 g.kg-1 of linolenic acid in the oil fraction, was developed by USDA-ARS in Beltsville, MD, USA (Leffel, 1994). This accession was crossed with the Brazilian commercial cultivar CAC-1, which presents an average of 85 g.kg-1 of linolenic acid in the oil fraction. Crosses were made in the greenhouse during the summer of 1995. Hybrid seeds, confirmed by fatty acid composition, were sown in two-liter pots and two plants/pot were cultivated. The F1 plant that produced the highest number of seeds was used to generate the F2 population. A total of 357 F2 seeds from a single F1 plant were harvested in December 1995, and numbered individually for the non-destructive single seed fatty acid composition analysis. F2 and parental seeds were sown directly into two-liter pots by using three seeds per pot. Plants were grown in the greenhouse under natural photoperiod, at 25 ± 5 °C, during the winter of 1996. The linolenic acid content was also analyzed in 10 seeds of 45 F3 random families. F3 families and parents were grown in the greenhouse under the same conditions described for F2 generation, during the summer of 1997.

Determination of fatty acid composition

The fatty acid composition of soybean oil was determined by gas chromatography-single seed analysis. A 30-mg portion was cut into small pieces with a razor blade, from the opposite side of the seed embryo, and macerated. The sample was divided into two 15-mg portions and one milliliter of hexane was added to each these portions. The mixture was incubated at 4 °C for 16 h under N2 atmosphere. After this period, the hexane extract was poured into another test tube and the solvent was evaporated by N2 injection. The fatty acid methyl esters were prepared by a methodology described by Bubeck et al. (1989). A volume of 0.4 mL of 1 M sodium methoxide was added to the lipid fraction and the test tubes were placed in a water bath at 30 °C for 1 h. One mL of water and 1 mL of hexane were then added to the test tubes. After one hour, 0.75 mL of the organic phase was transferred to another test tube containing anhydrous sodium sulfate. Finally, 1 mL of the organic phase was injected into a SHIMADZU GC-17A gas chromatograph, equipped with an AOC-17 auto-injector and a C-R7A integrator. A carbowax column (30 m x 0.32 mm) was used and the analytical conditions were as follows: temperatures of the column, injector, and detector were 225, 245, and 280 °C, respectively; Nitrogen gas flow rate, 1.3 mL.min-1.

Generation mean analysis

The genetic components of the means were estimated by fitting the model Y = Xb + e, where Y is the mean vector for the generations, X, the coefficient matrix, b, the genetic parameters vector to be estimated, and e, the mean-associated residual vector. The estimation was based on the weighted least square method (Mather and Jinks, 1971).

The null hypothesis for each parameter was evaluated by the t test. The number of degrees of freedom used was given by adding the degrees of freedom from each generation that constituted the estimator expression. The variance of each effect was obtained by applying the variance properties to the estimator of each genetic parameter assuming that generation means are independent (Mather and Jinks, 1971).

For variance analysis, the error vector was considered to be a multidimensional normal distribution with null expectation and covariance matrix equal to D, being D a diagonal matrix. The diagonal elements of D are the inverse of the variances of the generation means.

Variances analyses

The components of the genotypic variance () in the base population (F2) were estimated by using the phenotypic variances () of BARC-12 (P2) and CAC-1 (P1) and of the F1, F2, and F3 generations. Considering the additive model, the genotypic variance contains the additive genetic variance () and the variance due to the dominance ().

The broad and narrow sense heritabilities were determined by the expressions and , where the parameters , e are the genotypic, phenotypic, and additive variances, respectively, among the selection units. Since the F2 and F3 generations were not analyzed at the same time, the parents were analyzed in each generation and their phenotypic variances were used as estimators of environmental variance for the F2 and F3 generations.

Results and Discussion

Inheritance and heritability

The means and variances of the linolenic acid content in the five generations evaluated are shown in Table 1. The results from the F2 and F3 resulted in a null estimate of (Table 2). For this reason, heritability in the narrow sense was assumed to be equal to heritability in the broad sense. Based on these results, we concluded that approximately 75% of the total variation in the F2 population could be attributed to genetic effects of additive nature. These data suggest the viability of using simple breeding methods for genetic improvement of the low linolenic acid content trait in the soybean seed oil fraction.

The coefficient of symmetry for the F2 population did not differ significantly from zero (Table 3). Since dominance effects tend to deviate F2 means towards the progenitor bearing the highest concentration of dominant genes, these observations confirmed that deviations due to dominance were of small magnitude and were not significant.

The linolenic acid content showed high heritability, which is in agreement with the results obtained by Fehr et al. (1992). As a general rule, traits defined by a small number of genes show high heritabilities in early generations, permitting the fixation of distinct genotypes by using a small number of selfing generations (Anand and Torrie, 1963). Heritabilities between and within F3 families indicated that gains to be achieved by mass selection should be higher than those obtained by family selection. Although this is not the theoretically expected result, we suggest that either mass or family selection is efficient for promoting gains. This evidence is important for breeding programs because, associated with the high heritability, it suggests that it is possible to select desirable genotypes in the F2 population. Furthermore, the data point out that simple breeding methods such as mass selection or backrossing can be used to produce low linolenic acid content cultivars.

Estimates of the components of the additive model as well as the significance tests are shown in Table 4. The number of associated degrees of freedom corresponds to the sum of the degrees of freedom of each generation used in the estimation of the parameter.

The results obtained in the means and variance analyses showed absence of dominance (Table 4). Based on these results we concluded that an additive model is sufficient to explain practically all variation in linolenic acid content in soybean. The absence of an epistatic effect, evidenced by variance analysis, associated with an absence of dominance, evidenced by means analyses as well as variance analyses, demonstrated that will be easy to obtain pure lines with low linolenic acid content.

The broad sense heritability in the F2 generation and that based on F3 individuals demonstrated that successeful selection can be achieved without any need for breeding methods based on progeny tests. Either stratified mass selection or the backcross method are efficient for selecting low linolenic acid trait, since selection is not influenced by dominance deviations and this trait presents high narrow sense heritability. As evidenced by heritabilities between and within F3 families, it is easier to obtain gains via selection based on individuals than selection based on families. The introgression of the low linolenic acid content trait in elite soybean cultivars can be achieved rapidly since such a trait is easily selected in early generations and the backcross method can be used to recover the elite cultivars.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from FAPEMIG to M.A. Moreira. A.S. Gesteira was recipient of MS scholarship from CNPq.

Associate Editor: Natal Antonio Vello

Received: November 20, 2000

accepted: November 21, 2002

  • Anand SC and Torrie JH (1963) Heritability of yield and other traits interrelationships among traits in F3 and F4 generations of three soybeans crosses. Crop Sci 3:508-511.
  • Bubeck DM, Fehr WR and Hammond EG (1989) Inheritance of palmitic and stearic acid mutants of soybean. Crop Sci 29:652-656.
  • Burton JW, Wilson RF, Brim CA and Rinne RW (1989) Registration of soybean germoplasm lines with modified fatty acid composition of seed oil. Crop Sci 29:1583.
  • Burton GW (1951) Quantitative inheritance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Agron J Madison 51:42-46.
  • Falconer DS and Mackay TFC (1997) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Fourth Edition, Longman, Edinburgh, 464 pp.
  • Fehr WR, Welke GA, Hammond EG, Duvick DN and Cianzio SR (1992) Inheritance of reduced linolenic acid content in soybean genotypes A16 and A17. Crop Sci 32:903-906.
  • Leffel RC (1994) Registration of BARC-12 a low linolenic acid soybean germplasm line. Crop Sci 34:1426-1427.
  • Liu HR and White PJ (1992) Oxidative stability of soybean oil with altered fatty acid compositions. J Am Oil Chem Soc 69:528-532.
  • Mather K and Jinks JL (1971) Biometrical Genetics: The study of continuous variation. New York: Cornell University Press, 382 pp.
  • Neff WE, Selke E, Mounts TL, Rinsch W, Frankel EN and Zeitoun MAM (1992) Effect of triacylglycerol composition and structures on oxidative germoplasm. J Am Oil Chem Soc 69:111-118.
  • Yadav NS (1996) Genetic modification of soybean oil quality. In: Verma DPS and Shoemaker RC (eds) Soybean genetics, molecular biology and biotechnology. USA: CAB INTERNATIONAL, pp 165-188.
  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Third Edition, 662 pp.
  • Correspondence to

    Maurilio Alves Moreira
    Instituto de Biotecnologia Aplicada à Agropecuária (BIOAGRO), Universidade Federal de Viçosa
    36571-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      05 Sept 2003
    • Date of issue
      2003

    History

    • Accepted
      21 Nov 2002
    • Received
      20 Nov 2000
    Sociedade Brasileira de Genética Rua Cap. Adelmio Norberto da Silva, 736, 14025-670 Ribeirão Preto SP Brazil, Tel.: (55 16) 3911-4130 / Fax.: (55 16) 3621-3552 - Ribeirão Preto - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: editor@gmb.org.br