SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue4Polymorphism in the promoter region of von Willebrand factor gene and von Willebrand disease type 1Diversification of Ramphastinae (Aves, Ramphastidae) prior to the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary as shown by molecular clock of mtDNA sequences author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Genetics and Molecular Biology

Print version ISSN 1415-4757

Genet. Mol. Biol. vol.26 no.4 São Paulo Dec. 2003

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572003000400002 

ANIMAL GENETICS
RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

Genetic differentiation in geographically close populations of the water rat Nectomys squamipes (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

 

 

L.S. MarojaI; F.C. AlmeidaII; H.N. SeuánezIII

IUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Genética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
IIInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Diretoria de Pesquisa, Divisão de Genética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
IIIInstituto Nacional de Câncer, Diretoria de Pesquisa, Divisão de Genética e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Genética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRACT

We examined the genetic structure and the effects of a bottleneck in populations of the water rat Nectomys squamipes, a primary host of Schistosoma mansoni. Eight microsatellite loci were studied in 7 populations from the Sumidouro region of the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro. Our data, covering a four-year period during which a bottleneck occurred, revealed substantial variation (6-31 alleles per locus) and high levels of both observed (0.718-0.789) and expected (0.748-0.832) heterozygosity. Most populations were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium without linkage disequilibrium between loci. Overall average genetic differentiation between populations (estimated with the FST (q) and RST (r) analogues was 0.037 for q and 0.060 for r. There was significant allelic and genotypic differentiation between populations, especially in pairwise comparisons that included the most geographically isolated population. Direct migration estimates showed a low rate of migration, indicating that infected N. squamipes populations had a limited ability to spread S. mansoni. When the pre- and post-bottleneck populations were compared there was no detectable reduction in heterozygosity or allele number, although a significant excess of heterozygosity was detected in the post-bottleneck population.

Key words: microsatellites, migration, population genetics, Schistosoma mansoni host, Sigmodontinae.


 

 

Introduction

Water rats (Nectomys squamipes) are semi-aquatic rodents widely distributed along rivers and streams, including those located near the large urban areas of eastern Brazil. These water rats are primary hosts for Schistosoma mansoni (Rey, 1993) and although their fitness is not reduced by infection they are unable to eliminate the parasite (D'Andrea et al., 2000). Dispersion of N. squamipes populations might spread S. mansoni wherever the intermediate host (Biomphalaria sp.) is present, a possibility aggravated by the fact that N. squamipes has a wide geographic distribution which encompasses most areas of Brazil where schistosomiasis is endemic.

The study presented in this paper used eight highly polymorphic microsatellite markers to assess gene flow between seven N. squamipes populations (separated by distances of between 500 m and 6,000 m) inhabiting the Sumidouro region of the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro where schistosomiasis is prevalent. Because it has been shown (Gentile et al., 2000) that N. squamipes populations in the study area fluctuate and there are periods when specific populations reach almost local extinction, we investigated the populations both before and after bottlenecking to assess its effects on the genetic diversity of N. squamipes.

 

Materials and Methods

Study area

Animals were collected in two adjacent valleys (Pamparrão and Porteira Verde) and in Bela Joana in the Sumidouro region (22°02' S, 40°41' W) of the Brazilian state of Rio de Janeiro (Figure 1). Both Pamparrão and Porteira Verde valleys form part of a common hydrographic system with several small, permanent streams, irrigation channels and flooded areas, the landscape being composed of small rural establishments with plantations, pasture lands and fragments of Atlantic Forest. Distances between capture sites along rivers ranged from 500 to 6,000 m (Table 1). The capture sites in the Pamparrão valley were Sr. Célio (PC), Ponte (PP) and Braço (PB) while the site in the Porteira Verde valley was called Escola (PVE). Two other collecting sites named Banqueta (PVB) and Charco (PVC) were located along an irrigation channel connecting the two valleys. The most isolated site was Bela Joana (BJ), which is located outside these valleys.

 

 

 

 

Field methods

Capture lines (localities) were established along watercourses and flooded areas with between five and ten wire live traps being set every 13 m. Trapping sessions were conducted for five nights every other month during the mark and recapture phase (September 1995 to November 1996) and the removal phase of the study (April 1997 to April 2000), a total of 425 traps being laid per night for each trapping session. Detailed descriptions of this field study have been reported elsewhere (D'Andrea et al., 2000; Gentile et al., 2000). About 1 mL of blood was taken from the hind foot of 23 N. squamipes specimens captured during the mark and recapture phase of the study. Additionally, liver samples were obtained from 139 specimens captured during the removal phase of the study.

DNA isolation and microsatellite analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples or liver tissue by the standard proteinase-K/phenol-chloroform procedure (Sambrook et al.,1989). Samples were preserved in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH = 7.2) at an approximate concentration of 15 mg/mL.

We tested five microsatellite loci described by Almeida et al. (2000): Nec28 (GenBank AF283428), Nec15 (AF283422 and AF283421), Nec18 (AF283426 and AF283424), Nec14 (AF283420 and AF283419) and Nec12 (AF283417) and three other characterized by Maroja et al. (2003): Nec23 (AF353186 and AF353187), Nec08 (AF353184 and AF353185) and Nec19 (AF353188 and AF353189). PCR amplifications were performed in a 15 mL final reaction volume containing about 15 ng of genomic DNA template, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH = 9.0), 50 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 7 pmol fluorescence-labeled forward primer, 10 pmol reverse primer, 300 (M of each dNTP and 1 U Taq DNA Polymerase (Pharmacia). Cycling conditions were the same as in Almeida et al. (2000) and Maroja et al. (2003).

Fragment analyses were conducted with an automatic DNA sequencer ABI PRISM 377, with standard loading and electrophoresis conditions following a 3 h run. Alleles were sized relative to an internal size standard (ROX GS 500; Applied Biosystems) and analyzed with GENESCAN 2.1 (Applied Biosystems). Size estimates, in base pairs (bp), were rounded to integers differing by 2 bp.

Statistical analyses

Spatial analysis was performed by pooling data from individuals from the same locality. Inter-population differentiation between all population pairs was tested using Fisher's RxC test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1994), a procedure which analyses each locus to determine differences in allele frequencies providing that the populations under investigation are in Hardy-Weinberg (HW) equilibrium and that all alleles are assumed to be independent. Fisher's combined probability test was used as a global test for all loci to determine overall significance. These tests were performed with version 1.3 of the Tools for Population Genetic Analysis (TFPGA) program (Miller, 1997).

Genotypic differentiation between different populations and over all the populations as a whole was tested with the log-likelihood G statistic using genotype permutations rather than allele permutations, a test that does not require populations to be in HW equilibrium (Goudet et al., 1996). This test was performed with version 3.2a of the GENEPOP program (Raymond and Rousset, 1995).

Wright's FST analogue (q; see Weir and Cockerham, 1984) was used to assess population differentiation, calculations being made using GENEPOP 3.2a. Multilocus values of q across all populations were calculated with TFPGA 1.3. This estimate relies on the infinite allele model (IAM) which may not be the most appropriate model for analyzing microsatellite data. For this reason, we also calculated population differentiation using the RST estimator (r; see Slatkin, 1995) which is a more accurate estimate when mutations follow the stepwise mutation model (SMM), as may be the case with microsatellites (Valdes et al., 1993). The short time scale of this study may prevent significant departures from the SMM (Goldstein et al., 1995), such deviations normally being caused through factors such as lack of constraints on allele size (Bowcock et al., 1994) and the occurrence of mutations which are independent of allele size (Amos et al., 1996; Levinson and Gut, 1987). Estimates of r were calculated with the RstCalc program (Goodman 1997) after standardizing allele length to eliminate bias and with 5,000 bootstrap replicates for calculating 95% confidence intervals, standardization for each locus being performed by dividing allele length by the overall standard deviation of the repeat length (Goodman, 1997).

Isolation by distance was tested with the isolde option of GENEPOP 3.2a, differentiation statistics being linearized based on the stepping stone model (Rousset, 1997) using diff / (1-diff), where diff stands for either q or r values. Geographic distances were not transformed to a logarithmic scale because dispersion patterns of N. squamipes were uni-dimensional (along rivers). The Mantel test (Mantel, 1967) was used to test for a significant relationship between geographic distance and pairwise genetic differentiation.

In spatial analyses, genetic diversity in each population was estimated from the number of alleles per locus (A), heterozygote direct count per locus (HDC) and mean expected heterozygosity per locus (HE) under HW equilibrium (Hartl and Clark, 1989). Estimates of expected and observed heterozygosity were calculated with non-parametric statistics using TFPGA 1.3 because most variables did not follow a normal distribution. Significant HE differences between more than two populations were calculated using the Friedman ANOVA program (Zar, 1996).

Linkage disequilibrium between loci was tested with Fisher's exact test using the Markov chain analysis (3,000 de-memorizations; 450,000 iterations) under a null hypothesis postulating lack of genotype association between different loci, the calculations being performed with GENEPOP 3.2a. Each population was tested separately to avoid distortions resulting from the Wahlund effect.

Deviations from HW equilibrium for genotype proportions at each locus were tested by a Markov Chain approximation (3,000 de-memorizations; 450,000 iterations) of unbiased exact P-values (Guo and Thompson, 1992). A global test across loci was performed using Fisher's method, significance levels being calculated per locus, per population for all combined loci and populations (global test) using GENEPOP 3.2a. Wright's FIS analogue (f ; see Weir and Cockerham, 1984) was estimated with TFPGA, 95% confidence intervals being estimated by bootstrapping with 5,000 replications.

Temporal analysis was carried out by pooling animals from different populations with no significant allelic and genotypic differences captured during the same period. For this analysis we used data from a capture period (April to July 1997) before a bottleneck (November 1997 to August 1998, when there were only 2 or 3 captures per collection session) and after this bottleneck (November 1998 to August 1999).

To test for effects on microsatellite diversity (Spencer et al., 2000), we determined A and HDC in pre- and post-bottleneck populations and used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare A and HDC values between capture periods; A was compared using the same sample size for both populations (18 animals in each). To detect bottlenecks we used the method described by Cornuet and Luikart (1996) which is based on differences between observed and expected heterozygosity according to allele number in a given population (Nei, 1978), this method relying on the fact that after a bottleneck the number of alleles decreases faster than the expected heterozygosity (Cornuet and Luikart ,1996; Nei et al., 1975). As a negative control, we also tested for heterozygote excess in the pre-bottleneck sample by using a two-phase-model (TPM; 5,000 iterations) with 90% of mutations following the SMM using the BOTTLENECK program (Piry et al., 1999), TPM being an intermediate mutation model between IAM and SMM which is especially recommended for the study of microsatellite loci evolution (Rienzo et al., 1994). A test of significance was performed using the Wilcoxon test option, which provides relatively high power and may be applied with few polymorphic loci and any number of individuals.

To test for multiple sires and as accuracy controls for the microsatellite scores, the microsatellite genotypes of 14 captive-born animals (from 6 captured pregnant females) were compared to the microsatellite genotypes of their mothers. These offspring were excluded from the general population analyses to avoid over-consideration of related alleles.

 

Results

Differentiation of populations

The number of captured animals in each population is shown in Table 2, which also shows genetic data. We found significant allelic differentiation for all loci and populations (p < 0.001), 15 of 21 population pairs being significantly different (p < 0.001). When we applied the Bonferroni correction, however, differentiation was not significant for 6 population pairs: PVB/PVE (p = 0.025), PVB/PP (p = 0.027), PVE/PP (p = 0.291), PVE/PC (p = 0.009), PVC/PP (p = 0.089) and PVC/PC (p = 0.013). Analysis of each microsatellite locus showed that Nec15, followed by Nec18 and Nec19, contributed to most of the differentiation between populations while the smallest contribution was due to Nec08 and Nec28.

 

 

Significant (p < 0.001) genotypic differentiation was observed for all loci and populations. Each locus showed genotypic differentiation for all populations with the G-likelihood test, with p values ranging from 0.0002 for Nec15 and 0.0000 for all other loci. Genotypic differentiation was not observed with the Bonferroni correction for the same 6 population pairs lacking significant allelic differentiation discussed in the previous paragraph: PVB/PVE (p = 0.0699), PVB/PP (p = 0.1467), PVE/PP (p = 0.509), PVE/PC (p = 0.264), PVC/PP (p = 0.045) and PVC/PC (p = 0.023).

Multilocus values of both q and r across all populations indicated significant genetic differentiation (q = 0.037, 95% confidence interval-CI = 0.049-0.026; r = 0.060, 95% CI = 0.0596-0.1232; p < 0.001). Mean values of q and r between population pairs were q = 0.034 ± 0.021 and r = 0.059 ± 0.053 (Table 3). The Mantel test showed no isolation by distance (p = 0.117).

 

 

Linkage disequilibrium, HW-equilibrium and genetic diversity

All loci were highly polymorphic in all populations, with the mean allele number varying between 11.25 ± 3.88 in the population with the largest sample size (PP; n = 33) to 6.13 ± 1.13 for the population with the second smallest sample size (PVC; n = 8; Table 2). The overall mean allele number was 16.87 ± 7.51, while Nec23 showed the highest allele number (31) followed by Nec15 (24). Mean HDC values varied between 0.789 ± 0.11 for the PC population and 0.718 ± 0.07 for the PP population. Mean HE values varied between 0.832 ± 0.06 for the PP population and 0.748 ± 0.07 for the PVC population. The mean frequency of private alleles over all loci and populations was 0.038, with population BJ having the highest number of private alleles (nine, three of which were in Nec15), and population PVE (which had the lowest sample size) being the only population having no private alleles. Nec15 and Nec23 showed the highest number of private alleles (nine and four, respectively).

When we analyzed the populations separately we found no statistically significant (p > 0.03 with the Bonferroni correction) genotypic linkage disequilibrium but the global test across all populations was significant (p = 0.001) for Nec12 and Nec14, probably because of the pooling of individuals from different populations . When the global test was performed there was a significant (p < 0.001) deviation from HW-equilibrium, although the lower FIS margin was not very high (FIS = 0.1023; 95% CI = 0.0379 - 0.1783), probably due to the Wahlund effect. With the Bonferroni correction, HW-equilibrium across loci was significantly (p < 0.001) different from zero for Nec15, Nec19 and Nec23. Nec15 was in disequilibrium in the PVB, PC and BJ populations (p < 0.001), Nec19 was in disequilibrium only in the PP population (p < 0.001) and Nec23 was in HW-equilibrium for each individual population (p > 0.02). When we excluded these three loci from the global test, deviation from HW equilibrium was considerably lower (p < 0.04, FIS = 0.034; 95% CI = 0.067-0.0001).

Effects of the Pamparrão valley population bottleneck

Analysis of the pooled data from the PP, PVB, PVE and PC capture sites did not show any significant difference in the number of alleles per locus or in observed heterozygosity between pre- and post-bottleneck populations. However, heterozygosity excess was significantly higher than zero (p = 0.01) in the post-bottleneck population but was not significant in the pre-bottleneck population (p = 0.84).

Analysis of offspring and mothers

Analysis of 6 litters consisting of 14 captive born offspring showed no inconsistencies in microsatellite allele-scoring. There was no evidence of multiple paternity because we did not find more than 4 alleles per locus among the offspring of each litter. Although the number of families was too small to guarantee that offspring of the same litter were always single-sired, it is likely that copulation plugs observed in recently mated females (L.S. Maroja, field observation) probably hindered insemination by more than one male.

 

Discussion

The eight microsatellite loci investigated were all highly polymorphic, with a mean observed heterozygosity of 0.747 and mean allele number of 16.9 within populations. These results agree with a study of more geographically separate N. squamipes populations in which the same microsatellite loci showed a mean heterozygosity of 0.83 (Almeida, 2000). This estimate was, however, higher than that reported for small mammals such as the semi-aquatic rodent Arvicola terrestris, described by Steward et al. (1999) as having a mean microsatellite heterozygosity of 0.63, and Mus musculus populations where the mean microsatellite heterozygosity has been calculated to be » 0.61 (Dallas et al., 1995).

Geographically close populations of N. squamipes showed significant differentiation despite the short distances separating them, in agreement with previous studies of small rodents which have shown a significant population structure over small spatial scales (Selander, 1970; Dallas et al., 1995). This significant population differentiation indicates that migration is probably restricted (resulting in limited gene flow), this view being supported by ecological studies showing that N. squamipes dispersion is restricted and that most movement is confined to riverbanks. This finding is relevant in view of the fact that N. squamipes is a reservoir of S. mansoni (Ernest and Mares, 1986) and that its extensive distribution covers most areas where schistosomiasis is endemic (Ribeiro et al., 1998) and where some rodent populations show infection rates higher than 90% (Veiga-Borgeaud et al., 1986, 1987). One of the authors (L.S. Maroja) has noted that direct capture-recapture migration estimates covering the same study area show a low migration rate for N. squamipes, with only 10 (mostly males) out of 162 recaptured animals had moved from their original population (mainly from PVB to PVC) during a six-year period and it is probable that not all of them attained reproductive success. This migration pattern suggests/indicates that N. squamipes may not pose a serious threat of spreading S. mansoni on a large scale.

To assess population differentiation we used both q as an estimate of FST under the infinite allele model (IAM) and r as an estimate of RST under the stepwise mutation model (SMM), two estimates being used because both of these mutation models are controversial when applied to microsatellite loci. Estoup et al. (1995) found IAM to be more suitable (although this probably applied to a type of microsatellite repeat motif) whereas other studies have indicated that the SMM is the most adequate model (Valdes et al., 1993), especially when considering large genetic distances (although this was not the case in our study). Although our estimates of r were usually higher than q (mean r/q ratio = 3.40 ± 5.52), both estimators generally agreed and populations with significant genotypic differentiation also showed significant r values. Although RST and FST values may be expected to vary widely between loci for genealogical reasons (Slatkin and Barton, 1989), a downward bias in mean FST values (q) is to be expected in populations that evolved independently by both drift and mutation. This is because FST does not consider forward and backward mutation in allele size and thus underestimates differentiation between populations (Slatkin, 1995) but also because microsatellites evolve at a much higher mutation rate (Dallas, 1992) which results in a higher number of convergent mutations (homoplasies). Many other studies of natural populations have also reported a downward FST bias in relation to RST (Ciofi and Bruford, 1999; Reush et al., 2000; Shaw et al., 1999).

A significant bottleneck was found using the methods of Luikart and Cornuet (1998), despite the fact that allelic number and heterozygosity estimates did not differ between pre- and post-bottleneck populations as was the case for similar studies reported in the literature (Daley, 1992; Ardern et al., 1997). Since the amount of loss of heterozygosity depends on the time a population spends in the bottleneck (Nei et al., 1975), our findings might reflect the fact that the bottleneck encompassed only a few generations and, consequently, did not result in any considerable loss of alleles or of heterozygosity. Three alternative hypotheses might explain these results: firstly, it may have been that alleles were not actually lost and/or any allele loss could not be detected in our small samples; secondly, allele number and heterozygosity could have been re-established by immigration, although this is unlikely to have happened because the populations were analyzed immediately after the bottleneck; thirdly, the bottleneck may not have been as drastic as was indicated by our trap records. The Luikard and Cornuet analysis is preferable to other methods because it does not require genetic data from pre-bottleneck populations (Luikard and Cornuet, 1998), although it is restricted to analyzing relatively recent bottlenecks as was the case for our study. Because of the small number of animals captured we pooled more than one generation, but it appears that this did not affect the results because no excess heterozygosity was detected in the pre-bottleneck population. We may therefore conclude that the genetic diversity of Nectomys squamipes populations remains high despite undergoing regular bottlenecks. Understanding of this process might be valuable for conservation genetics of endangered species that are loosing genetic variability due to a reduction in effective population size.

Effective population size has been found to increase as a result of multiple rather than single paternity (Sugg and Chesser, 1994), multiple paternity having already been reported in several taxa (Avise, 1994) including rodents (Baker et al., 1999). We found no evidence of multiple paternity in the litters studied by us and since only one or two paternal alleles were detected in these litters they were probably sired by a single male. The fact that insemination by other males may have been hindered has been supported by our field observations which have detected copulatory plugs in recently inseminated N. squamipes females.

 

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Brazilian agencies CNPq-PRONEX 100/98, PROBIO/MMA, FIOCRUZ, FUJB, INCa/FAF and graduate grants from CAPES to LSM and FCA. We are grateful to Paulo S. D'Andrea for providing samples and to the staff of the Laboratório de Biologia e Controle da Esquistossomose (FIOCRUZ), especially JWF Costa, for help with the field work.

 

References

Almeida FC (2000) Microssatélites em Nectomys squamipes (Rodentia Sigmodontinae): identificação de loci e aplicação em um estudo populacional. MSc Dissertation, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro.        [ Links ]

Almeida FC, Maroja LS, Seuánez HN, Cerqueira R and Moreira MAM (2000) Identification of microsatellite loci in the water-rat Nectomys squamipes (Rodentia Sigmodontinae). Molecular Ecology 9:2172-2173.        [ Links ]

Amos W, Sawcer SJ, Feakes RW and Rubinsztein DC (1996) Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nature Genetics 13:390-391.        [ Links ]

Ardern SL, Lambert DM, Rodrigo AG and Mclean IG (1997) The effects of population bottlenecks on multilocus DNA variation in robins. Journal of Heredity 88:179-186.        [ Links ]

Avise JC (1994) Molecular Markers Natural History and Evolution. Chapman & Hall Inc, London, 511 pp.        [ Links ]

Baker RJ, Makova KD and Chesser RK (1999) Microsatellites indicate a high frequency of multiple paternity in Apodemus Rodentia). Molecular Ecology 8:107-111.        [ Links ]

Bossart JL and Prowell DP (1998) Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations lesson and new directions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:202-206.        [ Links ]

Bowcock A, Ruiz-Linares A, Tomfohrde J, Minch E, Kidd JR and Cavalli-Sforza LL (1994) High resolution of human microsatellites. Nature 368:455-457.        [ Links ]

Caugley G (1994) Direction in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:215-244.        [ Links ]

Ciofi C and Bruford MW (1999) Genetic structure and gene flow among Komodo dragon populations inferred by microsatellite loci analysis. Molecular Ecology 8:S17-S30.        [ Links ]

Cornuet J-M and Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001-2014.        [ Links ]

Crow JF and Aoki K (1984) Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81:6073-6077.        [ Links ]

D'Andrea PS, Maroja LS, Gentile R, Cerqueira R, Maldonado Jr A and Rey L (2000) The influence of Schistosoma mansoni on a naturally infected population of water-rats in Brazil. Parasitology 120:573-582.        [ Links ]

Daley JG (1992) Population reductions and genetic variability in a black-tailed prairie dogs. Journal of Wildlife Management 56:212-220.        [ Links ]

Dallas JF (1992) Estimation of microsatellite mutation rates in recombination inbred strains of mouse. Mammalian Genome 3:452-456.        [ Links ]

Dallas JF, Dod B, Boursot P, Prager EM and Bonhomme F (1995) Population subdivision and gene flow in Danish house mice. Molecular Ecology 4:311-320.        [ Links ]

Dinerstein E and McCraken GF (1990) Endangered grater one-horned rhinoceros carry high levels of genetic variation. Conservation Biology 4:417-422.        [ Links ]

Ernest KA and Mares MA (1986) Ecology of Nectomys squamipes the neotropical water rat in central Brazil: home-range habitat selection reproduction and behavior. Journal of Zoology 210:599-612.        [ Links ]

Estoup A, Garnery L, Solignac M and Cornuet J-M (1995) Microsatellite variation in honey bee (Apis melifera L) populations: hierarquical genetic structure and test of the infinite allele and stepwise mutation model. Genetics 140:679-695.        [ Links ]

Gentile R, D'Andrea PS, Cerqueira R and Maroja LS (2000) Population dynamics and reproduction of marsupials and rodents in a Brazilian rural area: a five years study. Studies in Neotropical Fauna & Environment 35:1-9.        [ Links ]

Goldstein DB, Linares AR, Feldman MW and Cavalli-Sforza LL (1995) An evaluation of genetic data with the use of microsatellite loci. Genetics 139:463-471.        [ Links ]

Goodman S (1997) rst calc: a collection of computer program for calculating unbiased estimates of genetic differentiation and determining their significance for microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology 6:881-885.        [ Links ]

Goudet JM, Raymond M, Meeüs T and Rousset F (1996) Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics 144:1933-1940.        [ Links ]

Guo SW and Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test for Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361-372.        [ Links ]

Hartl DL and Clark AG (1989) Principles of Population Genetics 2nd edition Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland MA, 481 pp.        [ Links ]

Le Page SL, Livermore RA, Cooper DW and Taylor AC (2000) Genetic analysis of a documented population bottleneck: introduced Benett's wallabies (Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus) in New Zealand. Molecular Ecology 9:753-763.        [ Links ]

Levinson G and Gutman G (1987) Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4:203-221.        [ Links ]

Luikart G and Cornuet J-M (1998) Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conservation Biology 12:228-237.        [ Links ]

Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27:209-220.        [ Links ]

Maroja LS, Almeida FC, Cerqueira R, Seuanez HN and Moreira MAM (2003) Nectomys squamipes microsatellites and homologous loci in sigmodontine rodents. Journal of Heredity 94:171-174.        [ Links ]

Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analysis (tfpga) 13: A windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data Computer software distributed by author.        [ Links ]

Nei M (1978) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, 512 pp.        [ Links ]

Nei M, Maruyama T and Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1-10.        [ Links ]

Piry S, Luikart G and Cornuet J-M (1999) bottleneck 1202: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity 90:502-503. Available at http://wwwensaminrafr/URLB.        [ Links ]

Raymond M and Rousset F (1995) Genepop (Version 12): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenism. Journal of Heredity 86:248-249.        [ Links ]

Reusch TBH, Stam WT and Olsen JL (2000) A microsatellite-based estimation of clonal diversity and population subdivision in Zostera marina a marine flowering plant. Molecular Ecology 9:127-140.        [ Links ]

Rey L (1993) Non-human vertebrate hosts of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosomiasis transmission in Brazil. Research and Reviews in Parasitology 53:13-25.        [ Links ]

Ribeiro AC, Maldonado A, D'Andrea PS, Vieira OG and Rey L (1998) Susceptibility of Nectomys rattus (Pelzen 1883) to experimental infection with Schistosoma mansoni (Sabom 1907): a potential reservoir in Brazil. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 93(Suppl 1):295-299.        [ Links ]

Rienzo AD, Peterson AC, Gerza JC, Valves AM, Slatkin M and Freimer NB (1994) Mutational process of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 91:3166-3170.        [ Links ]

Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and the detection of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219-1228.        [ Links ]

Sambrook J, Fritcsh E and Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual. 2nd edition. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press, New York.        [ Links ]

Selander RK (1970) Behavior and genetic variation in natural populations. American Zoologist 10:53-66.        [ Links ]

Shaw PW, Pierce GJ and Boyle PR (1999) Subtle population structuring within a highly vagile marine invertebrate the veined squid Loligo forbesi demonstrated with microsatellite DNA markers. Molecular Ecology 8:407-417.        [ Links ]

Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139:457-462.        [ Links ]

Slatkin M and Barton NH (1989) A comparison of three indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow. Evolution 43:1349-1368.        [ Links ]

Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1994) Biometry: the Principles and practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd edition. WH Freeman & Company, New York, 859 pp.        [ Links ]

Spencer CC, Neigel JE and Leberg PL (2000) Experimental evaluation of the usefulness of microsatellite DNA for detecting demographic bottlenecks. Molecular Ecology 9:1517-1528.        [ Links ]

Steward WA, Pirtney SB and Dallas JF (1998) Isolation and characterization of highly polymorphic microsatellite in the water vole Arvicola terrestris. Molecular Ecology 7:1247-1263.        [ Links ]

Sugg DW and Chesser RK (1994) Effective population sizes with multiple paternity. Genetics 137:1147-1155.        [ Links ]

Valdes AM, Slatkin M and Freimer NB (1993) Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics 133:737-749.        [ Links ]

Veiga Borgeaud T, Neto RCL, Peter F and Bastos OC (1986) Constatações sobre a importância dos roedores silvestres (Holochilus brasiliensis nanus Thomas 1897) na epidemiologia da esquistossomose mansônica própria da Pré-Amazônia Maranhão-Brasil. Cadernos de Pesquisa de São Luis 2:86-99.        [ Links ]

Weir BS and Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistic for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.        [ Links ]

Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical Analysis. 3rd edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 929 pp.        [ Links ]

 

Editor: Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda

 

 

Correspondence to
Héctor N. Seuánez
Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Diretoria de Pesquisa, Divisão de Genética
Rua André Cavalcanti, 37- 4o andar
20231-050 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
E-mail: genetics@inca.gov.br

Received: January 8, 2003; Accepted: May 29, 2003

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License