Karyotype characterization of Trigona fulviventris Guérin, 1835 (Hymenoptera, Meliponini) by C banding and fluorochrome staining: report of a new chromosome number in the genus

ANIMAL GENETICS

SHORT COMMUNICATION

Karyotype characterization of Trigona fulviventris Guérin, 1835 (Hymenoptera, Meliponini) by C banding and fluorochrome staining: Report of a new chromosome number in the genus

Alayne Magalhães Trindade Domingues^{I, II}; Ana Maria Waldschmidt^I; Sintia Emmanuelle Andrade^I; Vanderly Andrade-Souza^{I, II}; Rogério Marco de Oliveira Alves^I; Juvenal Cordeiro da Silva Junior^I; Marco Antônio Costa^II

^IUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Jequié, BA, Brazil

^IIUniversidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil

^{Correspondence}

ABSTRACT

Although many species of the genus Trigona have been taxonomically described, cytogenetic studies of these species are still rare. The aim of the present study was to obtain cytogenetic data by conventional staining, C banding and fluorochrome staining for the karyotype characterization of the species Trigona fulviventris. Cytogenetic analysis revealed that this species possesses a diploid chromosome number of 2n = 32, different from most other species of this genus studied so far. This variation was probably due to the centric fusion in a higher numbered ancestral karyotype, this fusion producing the large metacentric chromosome pair and the lower chromosome number observed in Trigona fulviventris. Heterochromatin was detected in the pericentromeric region of the first chromosome pair and in one of the arms of the remaining pairs. Base-specific fluorochrome staining with 4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) showed that the heterochromatin was rich in AT base pairs (DAPI⁺) except for pair 13, which was chromomycin A₃ (CMA₃) positive indicating an excess of GC base pairs. Our data also suggests that there was variation in heterochromatin base composition.

Key words: cytogenetics, heterochromatin, evolution, stingless bees.

Despite the predominant role of bees in the pollination of native species in ecosystems such as the Atlantic Rain Forest, bee diversity has been poorly studied. According to Kerr et al. (2001), stingless bees, which until 1838 were the only species used for the honey production in Brazil and pollination of the native flora, have been endangered due to factors such as deforestation, clearance of ground by burning and extractive activities.

The tribe Meliponini is pantropically distributed but the highest concentration and diversity occurs in the American tropics, with 56 genera being found in Brazil (Roubik, Segura and Camargo, 1997; Costa et al., 2003).

The stingless bee Trigona fulviventris Guérin, 1835 is characterized by a black head and thorax and dark orange metasoma. The nest is subterranean and located between roots at the base of large trees or underground and this bee shows no aggressive behavior in the defense of the nest (Roubik, 1992).

Cytogenetic analyses have contributed greatly to the studies of the phylogeny, speciation mechanisms and genetic variability of many plant and animal groups. Published data regarding the cytogenetics of Meliponini have indicated that the haploid number ranges from 8 to 18 chromosomes, although the predominant number is n = 17 (Kerr, 1952, 1969, 1972; Kerr and Silveira, 1972; Tarelho, 1973; Hoshiba, 1988; Alves, 1999; Rocha et al., 2002).

Kerr (1972), Kerr and Silveira (1972) and Tarelho (1973) have raised the hypothesis of polyploidy to explain the numerical changes observed in the karyotypes of these bees. However, subsequent studies on different meliponine species suggested that centric fission has been the main mechanism involved in the karyotype evolution within the group, since the polyploidy hypothesis does not explain the presence of heterochromatin or morphological chromosome variations observed in some species (Pompolo and Campos, 1995).

From a list of nineteen currently recognized Trigona species (Silveira et al. 2002), only seven have been studied cytogenetically. Some previous analyses was limited to a description of the chromosome number and of the pattern of heterochromatin distribution.

In the present study we developed a detailed analysis of the karyotype of T. fulviventris based on conventional staining, C banding and fluorochrome staining (4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole - DAPI and chromomycin A₃ - CMA₃).

Cytogenetic analysis was performed on a total of 25 samples from each of two colonies collected in the region of Pedra Branca (12°50'817" S, 39°30'766" W), near Salvador, the capital of the northeastern Brazilian state Bahia.

Slides were prepared using the cerebral ganglion of prepupal larvae, according to the technique proposed by Imai et al. (1988) and C banding was performed according to the method of Sumner (1972), modified by Pompolo and Takahashi (1990). Fluorochrome banding was carried out using the triple staining (DA/CMA₃/DAPI) method as modified by Schweizer (1980).

A minimum of 10 metaphases per individual was analyzed and those showing the best quality were photographed using Kodak Imagelink HQ film for conventional staining and C banding and Kodak T-MAX film for fluorochrome staining.

We determined that the chromosome number of T. fulviventris was 2n = 32. According to the nomenclature proposed by Imai (1991), the diploid karyotype consists of one metacentric chromosome pair which is very long compared to the remaining karyotype, two acrocentric pairs and 13 pseudoacrocentric pairs, differing little in size (Figure 1 A and ^B).

Except for one of the acrocentric pairs which was completely euchromatic (second pair - ^{Figure 1B}), we observed C⁺ band regions on most chromosomes. Heterochromatin was detected in the pericentromeric region of the large metacentric pair, on the short arm of the second acrocentric pair, and throughout the extension of one of the arms of all pseudoacrocentric chromosomes. One of the pseudoacrocentric pairs (pair 13) presented heterochromatin that was more strongly labeled than in the others and showed a conservative pattern in all metaphases and individuals analyzed, suggesting a difference in molecular composition.

Triple staining revealed CMA₃⁺ labeling only in pair 13 heterochromatin, while in the remaining chromosome pairs heterochromatin regions were DAPI⁺ (Figure 2). The euchromatic acrocentric chromosome (pair 2) was not labeled by any of the fluorochromes used.

In this paper we present the first report chromosome number variation within Trigona, 2n = 34 having been the only karyotype reported for all previously studied species, e.g. T. spinipes (Kerr, 1969; Tarelho, 1973; Brito and Pompolo, 1997), T. cilipes (Kerr, 1969), T. recursa (Tarelho, 1973; Costa et al., 2004), T. fuscipennis (Tarelho, 1973), T. branneri, T. hyalinata and T. chanchamayoensis (Costa et al., 2004). We also found another karyotypic difference, a large metacentric chromosome pair in the karyotype of T. fulviventris which was absent, or has not been reported, in the above cited species.

Previous studies have pointed to some possible mechanisms generating karyotype changes within Hymenoptera. Kerr and Silveira (1972) proposed the occurrence of polyploidy in a bee ancestral karyotype with n = 8 chromosomes. Subsequent changes in the chromosome number would have been the result of Robertsonian rearrangements. In contrast, data published by Pompolo (1992), Rocha et al. (2003) and Gomes (1995) suggested that the karyotype evolution of bees and wasps follows the same cycle of changes proposed by Imai et al. (1988), Imai and Taylor (1989), Imai (1991) and Hoshiba and Imai (1993) for different groups. Hoshiba and Imai (1993) suggested karyotype evolution according to the minimum interaction theory, which assumes that the main mechanisms involved in this process favor an increase in the chromosome number by centric fission, resulting in a reduction of size and, consequently, of a physical interaction between chromosomes during meiosis. This process would reduce the occurrence of deleterious chromosome translocations (for details, see Imai, 1991, 2001).

We observed a large number of chromosomes with pseudoacrocentric morphology in the karyotype of T. fulviventris, suggesting the occurrence of centric fission followed by the tandem growth of terminal heterochromatin. However, the first chromosome pair of the T. fulviventris karyotype, showing a metacentric morphology and heterochromatin distributed in the pericentromeric region, was considerably longer than the remaining chromosomes of the karyotype, a fact providing strong evidence for centric fusion between two pseudoacrocentric chromosomes. Centric fusion can be an important mechanism for eliminate excess of heterochromatin and thus reduce the risk of deleterious chromosome interactions (Imai, 1991).

Triple staining provided an analysis of complementarity of bands produced by DAPI and CMA₃. These results showed divergent base composition in the heterochromatin of this species. Positive CMA₃ labeling observed in the chromosome pair 13 heterochromatin (Figure 2B), suggests that this particular heterochromatin is rich in GC base pairs, since the CMA₃ fluorochrome is specific for these bases. In contrast, DAPI⁺ labeling was observed on chromosomes whose heterochromatin was weakly labeled by C banding, indicating a widespread distribution of the AT-rich heterochromatin. Costa et al. (2004) found a predominance of GC-rich heterochromatin in T. branneri chromosomes but not in T. recursa. These authors did not perform DAPI staining on these two species. Present and published data indicate that, besides being quantitatively variable, heterochromatin content may have different base composition and hence independent origins. Comparative studies based only on C-banding information may be misleading and molecular characterizations such as the fluorochrome staining described in our present study is an essential tool for future comparative analyses.

More conclusive evidence regarding the origin of the large metacentric pair and the reduced chromosome number observed for T. fulviventris should be obtained with the use of more accurate techniques, such as in situ hybridization or banding methods that permit a more detailed characterization of the chromosome arms. Such studies performed on T. fulviventris and compared to the patterns observed for other closely related species will certainly be enlightening and will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the karyotype evolution of the genus Trigona.

Acknowledgments

This study was developed at UESB, Jequié Campus, with the financial support of PRODOC/CADCT. We thank Drª Silvia das Graças Pompolo (UFV, Viçosa, MG) for technical support and indispensable contributions to the work and Dr. Gabriel A.R. Melo (UFPR, Curitiba, PR) for the Identification of Trigona fulviventris.

Received: October 13, 2004; Accepted: May 4, 2005.

Associate Editor: Catarina S. Takahashi

• Alves VS (1999) Análise citogenética comparativa de quatro gêneros da Tribo Meliponini e um gênero da Tribo Bombini. Master Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa.
• Costa KF, Brito RM and Miyazawa CS (2004) Karyotypic description of four species of Trigona (Jurine, 1807) (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini) from the State of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Biology 27:187-190.
• Costa MA, Del Lama MA, Melo GAR and Sheppard WS (2003) Molecular phylogeny of the stingless bees (Apidae, Apinae, Meliponini) inferred from mitochondrial 16S rDNA sequences. Apidologie 34:73-84.
• Gomes LF (1995) Estudos citogenéticos em vespas do gênero Trypoxylon (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae, Larrinae, Trypoxylonini). Dissertação de Mestrado em Genética de Melhoramento, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa.
• Hoshiba H (1988) Karyological analysis of a stingless bee Melipona favosa (Apidae, Hymenoptera). Cytologia 53:153-156.
• Hoshiba H and Imai HT (1993) Chromosome evolution of bees and wasps (Hymenoptera, Apocrita) on the basis of C-banding pattern analyses. Jpn J Entomol 61:465-492.
• Imai HT (1991) Mutability of constitutive heterocromatin (C-bands) during eukaryotic chromossomal evolution and their cytological meaning. Japanese Journal of Genetics 66:653-661.
• Imai HT, Satta Y and Takahata N (2001) Integrative study on chromosome evolution of mammals, ants and wasps based on the Minimum Interaction Theory J Theor Biol 210:475-497.
• Imai HT, Taylor RW, Crosland MWJ and Crozier RH (1988) Modes of spontaneous chromosomal mutation and karyotypes evolution in ants with reference to the minimum interaction hypothesis. Jpn J Genet 63:159-185.
• Imai HT and Taylor RW (1989) Chromosomal polymorphisms involving telomere fusion, centromeric inactivation and centromere shift in the ant Myrmecia (pilosula) n = 1. Chromosoma 6:456-460.
• Kerr WE (1952) A variação do número de cromossomos na evolução dos Hymenoptera. Scientia Genetica 3:182-219.
• Kerr WE (1969) Some aspects of the evolution of the social bees (Apidae). Evol Biol 3:119-175.
• Kerr WE (1972) Numbers of chromosomes in some species of bees. J Kans Entomol Soc 45:11-122.
• Kerr WE and Silveira ZV (1972) Karyotypic evolution of bees and corresponding taxonomic implications. Evolution 26:197-202.
• Kerr WE (1969) Some aspects of the evolution of the social bees. Evol Biol 3:119-175.
• Kerr WE, Carvalho GA, Silva AC and Assis MGP (2001) Aspectos pouco mencionados da biodiversidade amazônica. Parcerias Estratégicas 12:20-41.
• Pompolo SG (1992) Estudos citogenéticos em Meliponinae. Naturalia n. esp:62-66.
• Pompolo SG and Campos LAO (1995) Karyotypes of two species of sintgless bee, Leurotrigona muelleri and Leurotrigona pusilla (Hymenoptera, Meliponinae). Rev Brasil Genet 18:181-184.
• Pompolo SG and Takahashi CS (1990) Chromosome numbers and C-banding in two wasp species of the genus Polistes (Hymenoptera, Polistinae, Polistini). Insectes Soc 37:251-257.
• Rocha MP, Pompolo SG, Dergam JA, Fernandes A and Campos LAO (2002) DNA characterization and karyotypic evolution in the bee genus Melipona (Hymenoptera, Meliponini). Hereditas 136:19-37.
• Rocha MP, Fernandes A, Waldschmidt AM, Silva-Junior JC and Pompolo SG (2003) Longitudinal differentiation in Melipona mandacaia (Hymenoptera, Meliponini) chromosomes. Hereditas 138:133-137.
• Roubik DW, Segura JAL and Camargo JMF (1997) New stingless genus endemic to Central America cloudforests: Phylogenetic and biogeographic implications (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Syst. Entomol. 22:67-80.
• Roubik DW (1992) Stingless Bee: A guide to Panamanian and Mesoamerican Species and Their Nests (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponinae). Insects of Panama and Mesoamerica. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp 495-524.
• Schweizer D (1980) Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterochromatic regions (DA-DAPI bands) in human chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:190-193.
• Silveira FA, Melo GAR e Almeida EAB (2002) Abelhas Brasileiras: Sistemática e Identificação. Ministério do Meio Ambiente e Fundação Araucária, Belo Horizonte, 256 pp.
• Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304-306.
• Tarelho ZVS (1973). Contribuição ao estudo citogenético dos Apoidea. Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  05 Sept 2005
• Date of issue
  Sept 2005

History

• Accepted
  04 May 2005
• Received
  13 Oct 2004