Services on Demand
Print version ISSN 1415-4757
On-line version ISSN 1678-4685
Genet. Mol. Biol. vol.31 no.1 São Paulo 2008
Aliny Simony RibeiroI; José Francisco Ferraz de ToledoI; Carlos Alberto Arrabal AriasI; Cláudia Vieira GodoyI; Rafael Moreira SoaresI; José Ubirajara Vieira MoreiraI; Pedro Henrique Braga PierozziI; Maria Celeste Gonçalves VidigalII; Marcelo Fernandes de OliveiraI
IEmbrapa Soja, Londrina, PR, Brazil
IIDepartamento de Agronomia, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Maringá, PR, Brazil
Soybean is one of the most important crops in Brazil and continuously generates demands for production technologies, such as cultivars resistant to diseases. In recent years, the Asian rust fungus (Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. & P. Syd 1914) has caused severe yield losses and the development of resistant cultivars is the best means of control. Understanding the genetic control and estimating parameters associated with soybean (Glycine max) resistance to P. pachyrhizi will provide essential information for cultivar selection. We investigated quantitative genetic control of P. pachyrhizi and estimated parameters associated to soybean yield in the absence and presence of this phytopathogen. Six cultivars and their 15 diallel derived F2 and F3 generations were assessed in experiments carried out in the absence and presence of P. pachyrhizi. The results indicated that soybean yield in the presence and absence of P. pachyrhizi is controlled by polygenes expressing predominantly additive effects that can be selected to develop new cultivars resistant or tolerant to P. pachyrhizi. These cultivars may prove to be a useful and more durable alternative than cultivars carrying major resistance genes.
Key words: genetic components, genetic potential, yield prediction.
Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) is the most important crop in Brazilian agriculture, with a current cultivated area of 20.6 million hectares and an average yield of 2,809 kg ha-1 equivalent to an annual production of approximately 58 million tons (CONAB, 2007). Brazil contributes 20% of the world soybean production ranking second in soybean production (CONAB, 2006). However, average yield could be greater than 3,200 kg ha-1 if the effect of diseases was reduced (Almeida, 2001). Asian soybean rust (ASR) caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. & P. Syd 1914) is the most aggressive soybean disease and can result in losses of 10% to 90% of the crop (Hartman et al., 1999).
A recent doctoral thesis on the mapping of rust resistance genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) involved in soybean resistance to septoriosis caused by phytopathogenic fungi of the genera Septoria pointed out that economic and effective control of P. pachyrhizi can be obtained using resistant or tolerant soybean cultivars (Brogin, RL. Mapeamento de genes de resistência à ferrugem e de QTLs envolvidos na resistência à septoriose em soja, Ph. D. thesis, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz, São Paulo University, Piracicaba-SP, Brazil 2005).
In addition to the classical Rpp1, Rpp2, Rpp3 and Rpp4 resistance genes several major resistance genes have been identified in new plant introductions or cultivars (Bromfield and Hartwig, 1980; Hartwig, 1986; Hartman et al. 2004; Pierozzi et al. (submitted to Genet Mol Biol)). However, resistance to P. pachyrhizi expressed by single genes does not promise to be durable since the Rpp1 and Rpp3 genes proved not effective in soybean in the second year (2002) after P. pachyrhizi was first detected in Brazil. Although staking individual resistance genes could perhaps prove effective for somewhat longer periods of time, the search for horizontal quantitative resistance must be performed to ensure long lasting resistance or tolerance. Some soybean cultivars have shown more tolerance to P. pachyrhizi than others, which could be due to the presence of quantitative resistance genes in the plants. The development of resistant or tolerant cultivars in a breeding program can be greatly helped by a knowledge of the various types of gene action in the segregating populations. Plant breeding efficiency depends on a good knowledge of the genetic variability and type of predominant gene action in the control of the trait (Ramalho and Vencovsky, 1978).
Assessing the yield of soybean parent plants and their biparental cross derived F2 and F3 generations in the presence and absence of P. pachyrhizi is, therefore, likely to provide important clues on the possibilities open to breeders interested in developing soybean cultivars which are not only high-yielding but also resistant or tolerant to P. pachyrhizi. Ribeiro et al. (2007) assessed the severity of P. pachyrhizi attack on leaves of soybean cultivars FT-2, EMBRAPA 48, BRS 154, BRS 184, BRS 214, BRS 231 and reported that genes for resistance or tolerance to P. pachyrhizi displayed predominantly additive effects and are dispersed among soybean genotypes. If similar results can be obtained for yielding controlling genes, strategies for efficient cultivar development can be efficiently drawn. We investigated the same cultivars as Ribeiro et al. (2007) to assess the Genetic control of soybean yield in the presence and absence of Phakopsora pachyrhizi.
Material and Methods
We investigated six commercial cultivars (FT-2, Embrapa-48, BRS 154, BRS 184, BRS 214 and BRS 231) in biparental diallel crosses which produced 15 sets each of F2, reciprocal F2 (RF2), F3 and reciprocal F3 (RF3) generations. The six parental cultivars had expressed different levels of resistance and/or tolerance to P. pachyrhizi in several greenhouse tests conducted at the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa) National Center for Soybean Research (Embrapa Soybean, Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil.) and are high-yielding and well-adapted to the growing conditions in the Brazilian state of Paraná. The FT-2 cultivar carries a single gene for P. pachyrhizi resistance, probably Rpp1 or Rpp3, which express resistance to the P. pachyrhizi strain isolated from southern Brazil but not to the strain isolated in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso (the "MT" strain). All cultivars show similar growth cycle, which, in genetic studies, is important in minimizing the effects of time on P. pachyrhizi infection.
During the 2004/05 cropping season at the Embrapa Soybean experimental farm (23°11' S; 51°10' W) in Paraná we carried out two completely randomized experiments involving 11,400 (2 X 5,700) single-plant hill-plots, with one plant being equal to one hill-plot. Single plant hill-plots were used to allow growing the large number of plants (replications) in a restricted experimental area to reduce soil heterogeneity and to avoid having two experimental errors (between plots and between plants within plots) in the experiments, which would only add complexity to the genetic parameter estimation process. In each experiment, each parent was represented by 50 plants, each F2 and RF2 by 80 plants and each F3 and RF3 by 20 families of five plants each. In experiment I we sprayed the plants at the V2 plant growth stage with the fungicide Impact (0.6 L ha-1 equivalent to 75 g ha-1 of Flutriafol a.i.) and at the R3 and R6 plant growth stages with the fungicide Folicur (0.5 L ha-1 equivalent to 100 g ha-1 of Tebuconazole a.i.) to preclude development of P. pachyrhizi. In experiment II, we used no fungicide but instead inoculated the plants twice (once at plant development stage V3 and once at stage V5) with P. pachyrhizi strain MT using a suspension containing about 1 x 104 spores mL-1. The spores were produced on P. pachyrhizi infected leaves of the soybean cultivar BRS Bacuri in a contained green-house environment. Cultivar BRS Bacuri was chosen because it is resistant to the southern Brazil strain and susceptible to the MT strain of P. pachyrhizi, which are the two prevalent strains in Brazil, therefore ensuring predominance of the MT strain in our inoculum. The P. pachyrhizi strain MT original spores were collected in the State of Mato Grosso by Dr. Tadashi Yorinori in 2002 and kept in the Embrapa Soybean plant pathology collection under freeze-dried stored conditions. Both experiments received all recommended agricultural practices to ensure normal soybean plant development, including irrigation. The experiments were monitored three times a week to ensure prompt response to any abnormality that could cause the collected data to be unreliable. Details of other experiment characteristics and on the inoculation procedures are given in Ribeiro et al. (2007).
Individual single-plant plots were harvested at the R7 stage and plants taken to a shed for drying to 13% moisture prior to threshing and weighing of the soybeans to calculate grain-yield.
For both experiments, genetic models (Mather and Jinks, 1982) were fitted to the yield means and variances of the generations to estimate genetic parameters, narrow sense heritabilities based on F3 family means and predict the genetic potential of each biparental cross for generating high-yielding inbred lines (Jinks and Pooni, 1976; Toledo, 1987).
Table 1 shows the degrees of freedom, means and variances of the parents and their derived F2 and F3 generations in both experiments after pooling over reciprocals since no significant (p = 0.05) reciprocal effects were detected for yield in any generation. Significant yield differences were detected for each cultivar between experiments and also between cultivars within experiments. The largest yield reductions (in parentheses) between the two experiments were for BRS 214 (-86.04%), FT-2 (-83.59%), Embrapa 48 (-82.20%), BRS 154 (-75.07%) and BRS 184 (-75.02%). Cultivar BRS 231, which has been reported to carry quantitative genes for resistance or tolerance to P. pachyrhizi (Ribeiro et al., 2007), showed a smaller yield reduction of -67.83% between experiments and was top yielding in experiment II. The BRS 184 cultivar also showed some degree of tolerance to P. pachyrhizi as its yield did not significantly differ from that of BRS 231 in either experiment.
In experiment I, out of the 15 crosses investigated additive ([d]) gene effects were significant in 11 crosses and dominant ([h]) effects in 13 crosses. Dominance was predominantly positive towards increased yield. The estimated variance parameters indicated a prevalence of additive (D) effects in nine out of the 15 crosses with the presence of repulsion linkage between genes expressing additive effects in the Embrapa 48 x BRS 154 cross (D1 > D2, data not shown). No significant dominant (H) variance was observed and significant genotype x micro-environment interaction (E1 ¹ E2) was detected only in the Embrapa 48 x BRS 214 cross. The larger absolute values of [h] comparatively to those of [d] coupled with the predominance of D over H effects and detection of repulsion linkage in one cross suggested that the yield increasing genes were dispersed among the parents.
In experiment II, out of the 15 crosses investigated [d] gene effects were significant in 10 crosses and [h] effects in 11 crosses, with [h] effects always towards yield increase. Duplicate epistasis was detected in three crosses (FT-2 x Embrapa 48, FT-2 x BRS 214 and Embrapa 48 x BRS 214). The D estimates were significant in 8 out of 15 crosses, indicating that the genetic variability detected for yield in the presence of P. pachyrhizi was predominantly of the additive type. Repulsion linkage between loci expressing additive gene effects was detected on a single occasion in the BRS 184 x BRS 214 cross (D1 > D2, data not shown). No significant H estimates were obtained and significant genotype x micro-environment interaction was detected in two crosses (FT-2 x BRS 184 and Embrapa 48 x BRS 184). The main picture is that the genetic control of soybean yield in the presence of the pathogen was mostly by dispersed genes displaying additive effects.
Narrow sense heritability estimates based on F3 family means (Table 4) were of moderate value, ranging from 0.53 to 0.80 in experiment I and from 0.52 to 0.80 in experiment II, suggesting that selection for higher yield is likely to be successful in both cases.
Table 5 shows the genetic potential of each cross estimated as the percentage of random inbred lines expected to score higher yields than the BRS 231 cultivar in the presence and absence of P. pachyrhizi. The probability of generating random inbred lines superior to BRS 231 was higher in experiment I than in experiment II, but an overall picture of successful selection was portrayed in both cases.
The extreme yield reductions for all cultivars seen in experiment II as compared with experiment I suggests that the two inoculations (one at plant growth stage V3 and the other at stage V5) with P. pachyrhizi spores were carried out too early in the plant growth cycles. However, as previously reported in the disease severity studies by Ribeiro et al., 2007, screening cultivars, F2 plants and F3 families for P. pachyrhizi tolerance was successfully performed in experiment II using yield assessment. The genetic component analyses confirmed previous observations (Toledo, unpublished data) indicating that quantitative genes controlling yield in soybean in the presence of P. pachyrhizi are dispersed among the currently available Brazilian cultivars. Given the predominantly additive effect expressed by these genes, recurrent selection in the presence of the pathogen is likely to bring good results. This type of selection has been tried successfully before at Embrapa Soybean for insect resistance to stinkbugs (Souza and Toledo, 1995). Further indications of the feasibility of selection for quantitative resistance to P. pachyrhizi were provided by the moderate levels of heritability detected in some crosses and by the predicted potential of a few crosses to generate high yielding random inbred lines in experiment II. The experimental data clearly showed that, as expected, deriving random inbred lines with higher yields than BRS 231 is more difficult in experiment II than in experiment I. However, the predictions were rather encouraging given that at least five out of the 15 crosses showed that more than 10% of the derived lines were expected to yield higher than BRS 231 under P. pachyrhiz pressure and quantitative resistance, tolerance or both is likely to be durable.
Our data demonstrated that breeding soybean for resistance or tolerance to P. pachyrhizi does not have to rely solely on the few identified major genes already reported in the literature (Bromfield & Hartwig, 1980; Hartwig, 1986; Hartman et al., 2004; Laperuta et al. (submitted to Genet Mol Biol); Pierozzi et al. (submitted to Genet Mol Biol)). This is important especially after the MT strain had defeated the resistance expressed by the Rpp1 and Rpp3 genes after only two years of the presence of P. pachyrhizi in Brazil. In spite of the low yield attained under severe pathogen pressure in experiment II, cultivars showing quantitative levels of resistance or tolerance to P. pachyrhizi similar to, or higher than, cultivar BRS 231 may prove an important asset for farmers since with this level of resistance or tolerance they are likely to attain adequate yield levels in well managed fields where a single fungicide spray in a season could suffice to obtain good disease control, resulting in higher economic returns and safer cropping.
The authors thank the Brazilian agencies Embrapa, CNPq and FINEP for the financial support. Embrapa Soybean provided scholarships to ASR and PHBP during this work.
Almeida AMR (2001) Observação de resistência parcial a Septoria glycines em soja. Fitopat Bras 26:214-216 (Abstract in English). [ Links ]
Bromfield KR and Hartwig EE (1980) Resistance to soybean rust and mode of inheritance. Crop Sci 20:254-255. [ Links ]
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2006) Previsão e Acompanhamento das Safras. CONAB, Brasília. [ Links ]
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2007) Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos - 9º Levantamento. CONAB, Brasília. [ Links ]
Hartman GL, Sinclair JB and Rupe JC (1999) Compendium of Soybean Diseases. 4. ed. APS Press, St. Paul, 128 pp. [ Links ]
Hartman GL, Miles MR and Frederick RD (2004) Soybean rust: Historical significance and U.S. perspective, la hora del empowerment. XII Congresso de Aapresid, Urbana, pp 245-250. [ Links ]
Hartwig EE (1986) Identification of a fourth major genes conferring to rust in soybeans. Crop Sci 26:1135-1136. [ Links ]
Jinks JL and Pooni HS (1976) Predicting the properties of recombinant inbreed lines derived by single seed descent. Heredity 36:243-246. [ Links ]
Mather K and Jinks JL (1982) Biometrical Genetics. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, 396 pp. [ Links ]
Pierozzi PEB, Ribeiro AS, Moreira JUV, Laperuta LDC, Rachid BF, Arias CAA, Oliveira MF and Toledo JFF (2008) New sources of qualitative genetic resistance to Asian soybean rust. Submitted to Braz J Genetic. [ Links ]
Ramalho MAP and Vencovsky R (1978) Estimação dos componentes de variância genética em plantas autógamas. Ciência e Prática 2:117-140. [ Links ]
Ribeiro AS, Moreira JUV, Pierozzi PHB, Rachid BF, Toledo JFF, Arias CAA, Soares RM and Godoy CV (2007) Genetic control of Asian rust in soybean. Euphytica 157:15-25. [ Links ]
Souza RF and Toledo JFF (1995) Genetic analysis of soybean resistance to stinkbug. Braz J Genet 18:593-598. [ Links ]
Toledo JFF (1987) Predicting the inbreeding and the outcrossing potential of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] varieties. Braz J Genet 10:543-558. [ Links ]
Send correspondence to:
José Francisco Ferraz de Toledo
Embrapa Soybean, Caixa Postal 231
86001-970 Londrina, PR, Brazil
Received: June 29, 2007; Accepted: August 21, 2007.
Senior Editor: Ernesto Paterniani