SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue1BOX-PCR-based identification of bacterial species belonging to Pseudomonas syringae: P. viridiflava groupCytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Agaricus blazei methanolic extract fractions assessed using gene and chromosomal mutation assays author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Genetics and Molecular Biology

Print version ISSN 1415-4757

Genet. Mol. Biol. vol.31 no.1 São Paulo  2008

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000100020 

GENETICS AND MICROORGANISMS
SHORT COMMUNICATION

 

Sequence analysis of the rDNA intergenic spacer of Metarhizium strains isolated in Brazil 

 

 

Fabiana Y. Yanaka-SchäferI; Leonara P. Dall'OnderI; Mariana C. PanichiI; Roberta G. MendesI; Nelson J.R. FagundesI, II; Josiane B. BandinelliI; Maurício R. BogoI

ILaboratório de Biologia Genômica e Molecular, Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
II
Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Send correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

To assess the extent of genetic variability of rDNA intergenic spacer (IGS) in Metarhizium sp., 34 strains (27 isolated in Brazil) were sequenced and analyzed together with an additional 20 Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae sequences retrieved from GenBank. Overall, the global nucleotide diversity for the region under study was of 0.090, while for the Brazilian isolates it was only 0.016. Phylogenetic analyses showed four well-supported groups (A, B, C, and D), one of which (D) has not been previously identified. All but one of the Brazilian strains cluster in this novel D phylogroup, suggesting that the genetic variation found in Brazil is a subset of the worldwide M. anisopiliae var. anisopliae variation.

Key words: intergenic spacer, Metarhizium, rDNA.


 

 

The entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae (Metschnikoff) Sorokin (Deuteromycotina, Hyphomycetes) is an "obligate killer" (Ebert and Weisser, 1997) which has consequently been much studied for potential use as a biological control agent of insect pests in many countries. The utilization and the improvement of mycoinsecticides could be an alternative tool to overcome the considerable environmental impact and high economical costs posed by conventional insecticides (Roberts and St. Leger, 2004). The non-transcribed intergenic region (IGS) and the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) located in the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene cluster evolve rapidly and have been widely used as a tool to evaluate the genetic diversity within populations of fungi (Mavridou and Typas, 1998; Pantou et al., 2003; Hughes et al., 2004; Velásquez et al., 2007) and to resolve problems regarding the identification of species and isolates based on morphological characters (Milner et al., 1994; Driver et al., 2000; Iwen et al., 2002).

Even though Metarhizium strains have been used in Brazil against a number of insect pests since the 1980s (Garcia et al., 1984), an evaluation on the intraspecific genetic variability of Metarhizium isolates from Brazil has not so far been performed. Since better characterization of the genetic variation within an entomopathogenic fungus population could be useful for the selection of more efficient isolates for biological control, the aim of this study was to assess the extent of genetic variability in the IGS region of Metarhizium strains with special attention placed on the Brazilian isolates.

The 34 Metarhizium sp. isolates (27 isolated in Brazil) that were used in this study (Table 1) were provided by the following organizations: Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa) Genetics and Biotechnology Research unit (Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia - CENARGEN), Brasilia-DF, Brazil; School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, University College Swansea, Swansea, Wales, UK; and Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ) Brazil. The Isolates were cultivated in liquid complete Cove's medium (CCM) at 28 °C for 7 days and DNA was extracted and purified according to Raeder and Broda (1985). The IGS region of 34 Metarhizium strains was amplified using the Ma-28S4 and Ma-IGS1 primer set designed for amplification of M. anisopliae var. anisopliae rDNA (Pantou et al., 2003). The PCR reactions contained 0.2 mM of dNTP, 0.4 µM of each primer, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 units of Taq DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen) and 2.0 mM of MgCl2. Amplification used an initial denaturing step at 95 °C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min 30 s, followed by a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified with exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (GE Healthcare). The sequencing reactions were performed using the DYEnamic ET Dye Terminator Kit (GE Healthcare) and were read in a MegaBACE 1000 sequencer (GE Healthcare). After checking the chromatograms using the Chromas 2.23 program the DNA sequences were preliminarily aligned with ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997) and edited by visual inspection with the BioEdit program. An additional 20 strains of M. anisopliae var. anisopliae were retrieved from GenBank using BLAST (Table 2) and were also included in the analysis.

We selected the best evolutionary model in the Modeltest 3.06 program (Posada and Crandall, 1998), in which the K2P+G model (Kimura-2-Parameter with Gamma correction) received greatest support. Phylogenetic analysis using Neighbor-Joining (NJ) was performed with Mega 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001) based on K2P+G distance. To determine the reliability of the observed groups, 1000 bootstrap replicates were performed. Maximum Parsimony (MP) trees were constructed in PAUP* 4.0 (Swofford, 2002) using ten replicates of heuristic searches with random addition of sequences, and branch support was evaluated with 100 bootstrap replicates. Maximum likelihood (ML) trees were generated with PHYML (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003), based on a NJ starting tree and using the K2P+G model with parameters estimated during tree search. The BOOTPHYML program was used to perform 200 bootstrap replicates. Finally, Bayesian Inference (BI) was carried out using MRBAYES (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck, 2003) under K2P+G using 1,000,000 MCMC steps and sampling every 100 steps. The chains became stationary after 40,000 steps, so previous steps were discarded as burn-in. The estimation of the tree with the highest posterior probability was done through the majority-rule consensus of the remaining 9,700 trees. For each clade, nucleotide diversity (p) and its standard error were calculated using Mega 2.1 (Kumar et al., 2001).

The amplicons generated from Metarhizium isolates using the Ma-28S4 and Ma-IGS1 primers resulted in sequences of about 800 bp. The variability in length of IGS amplicons observed among the isolates sampled in this study has also been observed in other studies with Metarhizium strains (Mavridou and Typas, 1998; Pantou et al., 2003) and other fungi in the Hypocreales (Mishra et al., 2002). Including all insertion sites, we obtained a final aligned data set of 983 bp. Insertion/deletion events were treated as missing data and therefore the phylogenetic analyses were performed based on 512 bp. The final alignment of the IGS sequences showed high nucleotide diversity among isolates (p = 0.090 ± 0.007).

Because all methods resulted in trees with similar topologies, we only show the ML tree with the branch support values obtained from all methods (Figure 1). All methods showed the formation of four well-supported groups (A, B, C and D). Groups A, B and C were reported (with identical names) in other studies (Hughes et al., 2004; Pantou et al., 2003) and Hughes et al. (2004) also demonstrated that group A was subdivided in three subgroups (A1, A2 and A3). Our results support the existence of groups A, B and C, with the addition of a novel group (D), all with very high support values.

 

 

Group A showed a nucleotide diversity of 0.010 ± 0.002 and was composed of isolates IMBST9602, ATHUM 2920, KVL130, ARSEF439, ITALY12, IMI298059, KVL971 and CG393. In spite of all isolates being M. anisopliae var. anisopliae, they were from hosts belonging to different insect orders and from different geographic origins. Group A also contained the only Brazilian isolate that did not cluster in group D (CG393).

Group B isolates had a nucleotide diversity of 0.027 ± 0.004, shared a deletion at position 729-732 and clustered with M. anisopliae var. anisopliae isolates from European climates and collected from either insects or soil. Isolates V245, V218, KVL97125 and KVL9631 were from soil. Strains V219 and V242 were isolated from unknown hosts, but grouped consistently with isolates whose hosts belonged to the orders Dermaptera and Lepidoptera respectively. Although this could be an indication that these isolates came from insects, it is not possible to be very certain given that the sample size for this group was not large.

Group C was exclusively formed by isolates from Coleopteran hosts and was the group with the largest nucleotide diversity (p = 0.054 ± 0.006). This group was characterized by the presence of three deletions (positions 217-229, 262-337 and 663-666) plus the 729 to 732 deletion also observed in Group B, and is the same grouping observed by Hughes et al. (2004) and Pantou et al. (2003) with the addition of isolates V90, CG644 and V288 from our study. Isolates CG644 and V288 were previously classified as M. anisopliae var. majus, but grouped consistently with other isolates classified as var. anisopliae. Given the difficulties that can arise from a morphology based classification (Milner et al., 1994) we think that the more likely explanation is that these isolates were previously misidentified. Alternative explanations would imply that the M. anisopliae var. anisopliae isolates in this group were misidentified or that IGS does not have enough power to discriminate between these varieties.

Group D, previously unidentified, included all but one of the Brazilian isolates together with other tropical isolates from Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, Australia and Ethiopia. This group had a nucleotide diversity of p = 0.012 ± 0.002 and was divided into four subgroups D1, D2, D3 and D4, with subgroup D4 being further subdivided into D4a and D4b. Subgroup D1 contained only isolate CG489, which also presented one exclusive deletion (position 281-302). Some discrepancies about morphological and genetic species classification were found in subgroups D2 and D3. Our study strongly suggests that isolates CG423 (M. anisopliae var. acridum), V285 (M. anisopliae var. majus) and CG515 (M. album) are in fact all M. anisopliae var. anisopliae. This result was in agreement with former studies that demonstrated the lack of accuracy of morphological classification (Driver et al., 2000). Isolates from subgroup D4a shared a common deletion at 379-564 bp, while isolates of D4b group had one deletion at 92-125 bp. Interestingly, isolates from group D4b were both isolated from an Orthoptera host, even though in different continents. On the other hand, isolates in group D4a were all from the same country but each one isolated from hosts belonging to different Insect orders.

Overall, the nucleotide diversity in the Brazilian isolates was 0.016 ± 0.002, considerably lower than the estimate of 0.124 ± 0.008 obtained when excluding the Brazilian isolates. Together with the finding that all but one of the Brazilian isolates belongs to Group D, this suggests that the genetic diversity of M. anisopliae var. anisopliae found in Brazil represents only a subset of the worldwide diversity within this variety.

Our results suggest that the IGS region can easily assign M. anisopliae var. anisopliae isolates to one of the existing clades, and that it may help to solve discrepancies in the current classification of these isolates, even though the number of strains with identical genetic profiles (Figure 1) suggests that it is not well suited for individual isolate identification. While to some extent it was possible to associate phylogenetic position of the isolates with the hosts from which they were isolated or to the climatic zone of origin, on a finer scale a strong association between genetic and host or geographic origin was not found. Finally, we observed that although almost all Brazilian isolates can be assigned to Group D there is some genetic diversity among Brazilian strains, even among samples isolated in the same Brazilian region.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Brazilian state agency Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) for financial support and Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa) for providing the Brazilian strains. MCP was a recipient of a FAPERGS fellowship. RGM was a recipient of fellowship from the Catholic University Rio Grande do Sul (Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - BPA/PUCRS). The authors thank Dr. Soraya C.M. Leal-Bertioli for some DNA strains used in this work and Dr. Eduardo Eizirik for a critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Cladinara R. Sarturi for technical laboratory assistance and Felipe G. Grazziotin for helpful discussion regarding the phylogenetic analysis.

 

References

Driver F, Milner RJ and Trueman WH (2000) A taxonomic revision of Metarhizium based on a phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequence data. Mycol Res 104:134-150.        [ Links ]

Ebert D and Weisser WW (1997) Optimal killing for obligate killers: The evolution of life histories and virulence of semelparous parasites. Proc R Soc Lond 264:985-991.        [ Links ]

Garcia AS, Messias CL, Souza HML and Piedrabuena AE (1984) Patogenicidade de Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae em Ceratitis capitata (Wied.) (Diptera, Tephritidae). Rev Bras Entomol 28:421-424.        [ Links ]

Guindon S and Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696-704.        [ Links ]

Hughes WOH, Thomsen L, Eilenberg J and Boomsma JJ (2004) Diversity of entomopathogenic fungi near leaf-cuting and nests in a neotropical forest, with particular reference to Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae. J Invertebr Pathol 85:46-53.        [ Links ]

Iwen PC, Hinrichs SH and Rupp ME (2002) Utilization of the internal transcrib 17ed spacer regions as molecular targets to detect and identify human fungal pathogens. Med Mycol 40:87-109.        [ Links ]

Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB and Nei M (2001) MEGA2: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software. Bioinformatics 17:1244-1245.        [ Links ]

Velásquez VB, Cárcamo MP, Meriño CR, Iglesias AF and Durán JF (2007) Intraspecific differentiation of Chilean isolates of the enthomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae as revealed by RAPD, SSR and ITS markers. Gen Mol Biol 30:89-99.        [ Links ]

Mavridou A and Typas MA (1998) Intraspecific polymorphism in Metarhizium anisopliae var. anisopliae reveled by analysis of rRNA gene complex amd mtDNA RFLPs. Mycol Res 102:1233-1241.        [ Links ]

Milner RJ, Driver F, Curran J, Glare TR, Prior C, Bridge PD and Zimmermann G (1994) Recent problems with the taxonomy of the genus Metarhizium, and a possible solution. Proceedings of the VIth International Colloquium of Invertebrate Pathology and Microbial Control. Montpellier, pp 101-116.        [ Links ]

Mishra PK, Fox RTV and Culham A (2002) Restriction analysis of PCR amplified nrDNA regions revealed intraspecific variation within populations of Fusarium culmorum. Microbiol Lett 215:291-296.        [ Links ]

Pantou MP, Mavridou A and Typas MA (2003) IGS sequence variation, group-I introns and the complete nuclear ribosomal DNA of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium: Excellent tools for isolate detection and phylogenetic analysis. Fungal Genet Biol 38:159-174.        [ Links ]

Posada D and Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.        [ Links ]

Raeder U and Broda P (1985) Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol 1:17-20.        [ Links ]

Roberts DW and St Leger RJ (2004) Metarhizium spp., cosmopolitan insect-pathogenic fungi: Mycological aspects. Adv Appl Microbiol 54:1-70.        [ Links ]

Ronquist F and Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.        [ Links ]

Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods) 4.0 Beta, Florida State University. CD-ROM.        [ Links ]

Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F and Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple seqeunce alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nuc Acids Res 24:4876-4882.        [ Links ]

 

Internet Resources

Chromas 2.23 at http://www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html        [ Links ]

BioEdit program at http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html        [ Links ]

 

 

Send correspondence to:
Maurício Reis Bogo.
Faculdade de Biociências,
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul,
Av. Ipiranga 6681, Prédio 12C, Sala 172,
90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
E-mail: mbogo@pucrs.br

Received: April 5, 2007; Accepted: July 24, 2007.

 

 

Associate Editor: Luis Carlos de Souza Ferreira