SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue1Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of Agaricus blazei methanolic extract fractions assessed using gene and chromosomal mutation assaysAn effective device for generating alginate microcapsules author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Genetics and Molecular Biology

Print version ISSN 1415-4757

Genet. Mol. Biol. vol.31 no.1 São Paulo  2008

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000100022 

MUTAGENESIS
RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

Over-activation of the Drosophila melanogaster hsp83 gene by selenium intoxication

 

 

Ronaldo Medeiros GolombieskiI, II; Daniel Ângelo Sgranzerla GraichenII; João Batista Teixeira da RochaI, III; Vera Lúcia da Silva ValenteII; Élgion Lúcio da Silva LoretoII, IV

IPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Bioquímica Toxicológica, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria,Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
IIPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Genética,Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
IIIDepartamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
IVDepartamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil

Send correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

Selenium is an important dietary micronutrient and an essential component of selenoproteins and the active sites of some enzymes, although at high concentrations it is toxic. We investigated diphenyl diselenide ((C6H5)2Se2 ) for its effects on the developmental stages of Drosophila melanogaster and found that in the larval and pupae stages the toxic threshold for this compound when added to the banana-agar medium on which the larva were fed was 350 µmol. In adult flies, fed on the same media, there were no observable toxic effects below 500 µmol but there were toxic effects above 600 µmol, indicating that adult flies were more resistant to selenium intoxication. In larvae, a when diphenyl diselenide was present above the toxic threshold there was increased activation of the hsp83 heat shock protein gene. Selenium promotes oxidation of sulfhydryl groups and affects the folding of proteins and this could explain the over-expression of hsp83 because the product of this gene is involved in protein folding and defense responses, including the response to heat shock.

Key words: gene activation, hsp83 gene, selenium, diphenyl diselenide.


 

 

Introduction

Cellular responses to stress are evolutionarily ancient, ubiquitous, and essential mechanisms for the continued survival and reproduction of organisms (Lindquist, 1986; Feder and Hofmann, 1999). An important part of the cellular response to heat stress is played by a group of genes coding for heat shock proteins (HSP) or stress proteins, because their expression can be induced by high temperatures and a whole range of other stress factors (Sørensen et al., 2003; Sørensen et al., 2005). Stress responsive genes are of interest to the study and understanding of not only environmental stress resistance and stress response in general but also protein folding-mediated diseases in humans, immunological responses, animal breeding, genetic stress, protein quality control, developmental biology and gene regulation (Sørensen et al., 2005).

Selenium, a nonmetal related to sulfur and tellurium, has long been recognized as a dietary antioxidant and as an important dietary micronutrient in mammals (Walter et al., 1972; Combs and Combs, 1986; Leibovitz et al., 1990; May, 2002). At the molecular level, selenium is an essential component of the active sites of the enzymes glutathione peroxidase (Enzyme Commission number = EC 1.11.1.9), iodothyronine 5'-deiodinase (EC 1.97.1.10) and mammalian thioredoxin reductase (TrxR, EC 1.8.1.9) and is also present in several other mammalian selenoproteins. A deficiency in dietary selenium results in decreased levels of selenoproteins, thus compromising biological processes that are maintained by these proteins (Martin-Romero et al., 2001). Both glutathione peroxidase and TrxR catalyze reactions that are essential to the protection of cellular components against oxidative and free radical damage. As a consequence of the growing recognition of the important biological role of selenium, a number of novel pharmaceutical agents which are selenium-based or which target specific aspects of selenium metabolism are under development (May, 1999; Meotti et al., 2004).

A variety of seleno-organic compounds are now considered as potential antioxidant and chemopreventive pharmacological agents (Commandeur et al., 2001; Klotz and Sies, 2003). Müller et al. (1984) described 2-phenyl-1,2-benzisoselenazol-3(2H)-one, a synthetic lipid-soluble selenium-containing heterocyclic also known as PZ 51, DR3305 or Ebselen, which mimics glutathione peroxidase activity an which has been successfully used experimentally and pre-clinically in a variety of situations where free radicals were involved (Parnham et al., 1987; Harman et al., 1992; Kobayashi et al., 2001; Kono et al., 2001; Porciúncula et al., 2001; Rossato et al., 2002a, 2002b; Farina et al., 2003; Klotz and Sies, 2003). Diselenides are good candidates as antioxidant agents because they have some chemical and biochemical characteristics in common with Ebselen in that they exert glutathione peroxidase-like activity and can react with sulfhydryl groups to form selenosulfide (-Se-S) and disulfides, (Engman et al., 1994; Barbosa et al., 1998). Of particular importance is diphenyl diselenide ((C6H5)2Se2 ), the simplest of the diaryl diselenides, which has been shown to be even more active as a glutathione peroxidase mimic (Wilson et al., 1989) and less toxic to rodents than Ebselen (Meotti et al., 2003; Nogueira et al., 2003). Furthermore, diphenyl diselenide shows anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity (Nogueira et al., 2001) and has a neuroprotective effect on in vitro models of ischemia (Ghisleni et al., 2003) and glutamate neurotoxicity (Porciúncula et al., 2001; Rossato et al., 2002a).

The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been used for over a century as a model for probing the mysteries of genetics and biology (Ashburner, 2005; Tickoo and Russell, 2002). Comparative studies between the fly and human genomes have identified strong evolutionary conservation from insects to mammals at both sequence (structure) and pathway (function) levels (Rubin et al., 2000; Ballatori and Villalobos, 2002). The use of sophisticated genetic approaches combined with emerging genomics technologies suggest that the fly has much to offer as a tool for understanding basic cellular processes and provides an attractive and complex model system for exploring the molecular basis of human diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's disease and Huntington's disease (Rubin et al., 2000; Tickoo and Russell, 2002).

Heat shock proteins (HSP) are members of a larger group of proteins called molecular chaperones, characterized by their ability to affect the structure or folded state of other proteins and are a family of proteins that are constitutively expressed at high level, with levels increasing when cells are stressed. The HSP include both highly conserved and more variable members, and are induced in all cells in response to heat stress (Lindquist, 1986). In Drosophila, six major HSP (Hsp-83, Hsp-70, Hsp-27, Hsp-26, Hsp-23 and Hsp-22) are induced in response to heat stress, with Hsp83 being constitutively expressed and upregulated several times during heat stress. The functions of Hsp83 include regulating the activity of other proteins such as specific steroid hormone receptor molecules (Picard et al., 1990; Parsell and Lindquist, 1993). Heat stress causes trimerization and activation of the constitutively expressed heat shock transcription factor (HSF), which is required for hsp gene induction (Jedlicka et al., 1997; Westwood et al., 1991). The hsp83 gene is a member of the hsp90 gene family, which has been highly conserved through evolution (King and Tower, 1999).

In this paper, we describe the toxicological effect of diphenyl diselenide during different stages of the D. melanogaster life cycle and present hsp83 transcription data on the potential of this seleno-organic compound to promote cellular stress.

 

Material and Methods

Drosophila stock used and rearing conditions

We obtained Drosophila melanogaster (Harwich strain) from the National Species Stock Center, Bowling Green, OH, USA. The flies were reared in 2.5 cm x 6.5 cm bottles containing 5 mL of cornmeal medium (Klein et al. 1999) at constant temperature and humidity (20 °C ± 1 °C and 60% relative humidity). Analyses of viability and developmental rate of the flies in different diphenyl diselenide molarities were performed in banana-agar medium (20% v/v homogenized banana; 1% (w/v) brewer's yeast; 2% (w/v) sucrose; 1% (w/v) powdered milk; 1% (w/v) agar; and 0.08% (v/w) methyl p-hydroxybenzoate (Nipagin® Delaware, Brazil). Diphenyl diselenide (molecular formula (C6H5)2Se2 (molar mass 312.13 g mol-1, CAS 1666-13-3). Diphenyl diselenide was synthesized according to literature methods (Paulmier, 1986) dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and added to the medium to produce diphenyl diselenide concentration, from 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1000 µmol (C6H5)2Se2 /kg of medium. In the control treatment only DMSO was added to the medium.

To test egg to adult survival and developmental rate in different diphenyl diselenide molarities about 200 adult flies were transferred to a 300 mL empty bottle, which was inverted over a Petri dish containing banana medium to allow the flies to deposit fresh embryos. After 30 min the eggs were picked with a histological needle and rinsed in 0.5% (v/w) sodium hypochloride solution, after in distilled water and transferred to medium containing the desired molarity of diphenyl diselenide. Thirty eggs were placed per bottle and observed daily to accompany the developmental stages. Five replicates were prepared per treatment.

To determine the lifespan of the adult flies when they were unexposed or exposed to diphenyl diselenide freshly ecloded flies were collected and reared on banana-agar medium containing the desired diphenyl diselenide molarities. For each experiment, 10 vials, each containing 5 males and 5 females, were maintained at 20 °C. Flies were transferred to new vials every 3 days. The number of dead flies was counted every day. Generally, five replicates were prepared per treatment but in some cases up to eight replicates were made.

Molecular methods

To investigate whether exposure to diphenyl diselenide induced cellular stress we estimated the transcriptional expression of the Hsp83 gene using the Northern blot method. Total RNA was isolated from third-instar D. melanogaster larvae which had been exposed to one of following treatments: i) reared completely in banana-agar medium supplemented with 300 µmol of diphenyl diselenide; ii) transferred 8 h before RNA isolation to banana-agar medium supplemented with either 300 or 800 µmol/kg of diphenyl diselenide; iii) transferred 2 h before RNA isolation to a 30 °C chamber to induce heat shock. A group of control larvae were reared on unsupplemented banana-agar medium. Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) using 30 larvae in each treatment. Total RNA (10 mg) was fractionated on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel in 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine-ethanesulphonic acid (HEPES)/formamide buffer and transferred to Hybond® N+ nylon membrane (Amersham Bioscience). The membranes were hybridized to the random prime-labeled probes at 65 °C in a mixture containing 0.1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5% (w/v) dextran sulfate and a 20-fold dilution of liquid block (Gene Image Kit®- Amersham Biosciences) in 5x saline-sodium citrate (SSC) buffer. The filters were washed twice at 65 °C, firstly with 1x SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS and then with 0.2% SSC and 1% (w/v) SDS, in both cases under agitation for 15 min. For detection, the Gene Image CPD-Star kit (Amersham Biosciences) was used, following the manufacturer's instructions.

The phsp83 plasmid (Straten et al., 1997) containing the D. melanogaster hsp83 gene was used as probe. To control the quantity of RNA applied to the gel, the membrane was re-hybridized with the plasmid containing the 18S rRNA sequence (Straten et al., 1997).

Statistical analyses

The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves for all survival experiments using the SPSS 10.0 for Windows Software. Differences in survival between treatment groups were compared using the non-parametric Log-Rank test, where p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between experimental and control groups. The individual p values were adjusted for multiple testing by controlling for false discovery rate using the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). The Northern blots were analyzed with the LabImage® Gel Analysis and Documentation System program version 2.62© 1999-2001 (Kapelan GmbH, German).

 

Results

In the experiments to test the effects of different diphenyl diselenide molarities on D. melanogaster egg-to-pupae developmental rate and viability we found a molarity-dependent relationship between diphenyl diselenide concentration and the rate of development of D. melanogaster. As the molarity of diphenyl diselenide increased there was a delay from one to four days for larvae to reach the pupae stage (Figure 1). This data was subjected to chi-squared analysis and the Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate method (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995) and the results presented in Table 1. In most cases a higher diphenyl diselenide molarity was related to a significant reduction in the viability of the flies. The exception was 300 µmol diphenyl diselenide which showed a slightly increased percentage viability (89%) compared with control flies treated with DMSO only, for which only 88% of eggs reached the pupae stage. However, viability decreased when the larvae were exposed to diphenyl diselenide molarities exceeding 300 µmol (Table 1), with the pupal stage being reached by 76% of eggs exposed to 350 µmol diphenyl diselenide, 73% exposed to 400 µmol, 37% exposed to 450 µmol and only 7% exposed to 500 µmol. At diphenyl diselenide molarities exceeding 500 µmol all larvae died. Almost all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant, the exception being the lack of significance between diphenyl diselenide molarities of 350 µmol and 400 µmol (Table 1).

 

 

 

 

The effect of different diphenyl diselenide molarities on the pupal stage of the D. melanogaster life cycle is shown in Figure 2. In the control without diphenyl diselenide the percentage viability at this stage was 80% but the viability increased to 86% at 300 µmol diphenyl diselenide, although there was an average delay of two days for the flies to complete their developmental cycle. However, at higher diphenyl diselenide molarities there was a significant decline in viability from 72% viability at 350 µmol diphenyl diselenide to 3.33% viability at 500 µmol (Table 2) and the development cycle increased from two to seven days as diphenyl diselenide concentration increased. At 600 µmol diphenyl diselenide and above none of the pupae survived. Almost all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant, the exception being the lack of significance between diphenyl diselenide molarities of 350 µmol and 400 µmol (Table 2).

 

 

 

 

The adult flies were more resistant to diphenyl diselenide intoxication than larvae or pupae. Below 500 µmol diphenyl diselenide there was no significant alteration to the lifespan of adult flies (data not shown). However, contrasting with the lower diphenyl diselenide molarities, there was a significant decline in the lifespan of the adult flies at molarities exceeding 500 µmol when compared to the control group without diphenyl diselenide (Figure 3, Table 3). Between 500 µmol and 1000 µmol diphenyl diselenide there was, with one exception, no significant difference in the lifespan of the flies, suggesting a similar level of toxicity. The exception was that when 600 µmol diphenyl diselenide was compared to the control group without diphenyl diselenide there was no statistically significant difference (Table 3) but there was a statistically significant difference between the 600 µmol and 800 µmol diphenyl diselenide molarities. These experiments were replicated five times and produced similar results (data not shown), with 500 µmol diphenyl diselenide failing to produce significantly different results from the control without diphenyl diselenide in some replicates while in other replicates 600 mM diphenyl diselenide failed to produce significantly different results from the control. These results suggest that the interval between 500 µmol and 600 µmol is the threshold at which diphenyl diselenide affects Drosophila adult lifespan. We also found that on the first five days the mortality of the adult flies exposed to various diphenyl diselenide molarities was very similar to that for unexposed control flies but, subsequently, the lifespan of the flies decreased, mainly for the flies exposed to the higher diphenyl diselenide molarities.

 

 

 

 

Northern blot analyses showed differential expression of hsp83 in the different treatments (Figure 4). The treatments were able to increase the transcription of this gene, though not to the same intensity as heat shock treatment. Quantification of hsp83 expression with the LabImage program gave a Northern blot value of 1.197 ± 0.053 for larvae maintained on medium containing 300 µmol diphenyl diselenide and 1.421 ± 0.051 for larvae growing on the same medium but which were also heat shocked. In comparison, larvae maintained on medium containing 800 µmol diphenyl diselenide gave a Northern blot value of 1.19 ± 0.036 compared with 1.604 ± 0.021 for larvae growing on the same medium but which were also heat-shocked. All these Northern blot values compare to an arbitrarily defined value of 1 given to the control without diphenyl diselenide. The Northern blot values for the diphenyl diselenide treatments were significantly different from control without diphenyl diselenide (both with and without heat shock treatment), suggesting that although this seleno-organic compound is able to induce a cellular stress responses the response is not as strong as that caused by heat shock.

 

 

Discussion

Selenium, while essential to the metabolism of living organisms, presents toxic effects when present at molarities higher than required in the diet. These effects could be observed in our experiments with D. melanogaster. The importance of selenium in D. melanogaster metabolism is indicated by the fact that when a low concentration of elemental selenium (Rosenfeld and Belth, 1964) or sodium selenite (Lewgoy and Cordeiro, 1971) was added to D. melanogaster culture medium there was a significant increase in the viability of the flies, although these authors also showed that high molarities of selenium decreased the viability of the flies.

The results obtained in our present work using the organic compound diphenyl diselenide, as a selenium source were consistant with those previously described by other authors (Rosenfeld and Belth, 1964; Lewgoy and Cordeiro, 1971).

In our study, 300 µmol diphenyl diselenide caused a 6% increase in the viability of D. melanogaster larvae/pupae/adult flies, while at molarities higher than 350 µmol it produced toxic effects. These results support other studies described in the literature that show that selenium is toxic to various organisms when present at molarities in excess of dietary requirements (Painter, 1941; Wilber, 1980; Yang et al., 1983; Helzisouer et al., 1985; Navarro-Alarcon and Lopez-Martinez, 2000).

Interestingly, we found that pre-adult stages were more susceptible to selenium intoxication than adult flies, with the baseline diphenyl diselenide concentration producing toxic effect in adult flies (500 µmol) being lethal to larvae. This is possibly explainable by the metabolic differences between these stages, with larvae and pupae possessing cells undergoing active mitotic divisions while adults are post-mitotic. Affleck et al. (2006) have shown that methotrexate (an antimetabolite and antifolate used the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases and which acts by inhibiting folic acid metabolism) presents toxic and teratogenic effects in both larvae and pupae of drosophila but produces no such effects in adult flies, possibly because adult drosophila are post-mitotic. One explanation for such effects could be that larvae are more susceptible to selenium intoxication because they are in permanent close contact with selenium in the medium on which they are feeding. However, we observed the same toxicity pattern for pupae, which are generally on the surface of the medium and which are not actively feeding. It thus seems probable that the toxic effects of selenium in regard to drosophila pupae are probably related to ingestion and absorption of selenium during the larval stage.

In the experiments designed to investigate the effects of various diphenyl diselenide molarities on the lifespan of adult D. melanogaster we found that on the first five days mortality was very similar to that for control flies not exposed to diphenyl diselenide but the lifespan of the flies subsequently decreased, principally flies exposed to the higher molarities. These results were similar to those described by Leal and Neckameyer (2002) who found that there was a delay of about three days in the initiation of feeding by adult D. melanogaster when the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transport inhibitor DL-2,4-diaminobutyric acid (DABA) was added to their medium, possibly because the flies took around three days to start to ingest the medium. This may also have been the case for our experiments with adult flies, although it is also possible that diphenyl diselenide has a delayed effect and only acts about five five days after ingestion.

At toxic molarities we found that diphenyl diselenide induced the hsp83 cellular stress response gene. The product of this gene is an 83 kD protein reported to be involved in variouse processes, including protein complex assembly, protein folding, the defense response and the heat response (Lange et al., 2000). Several authors have shown that diphenyl diselenide promotes oxidation of sulfhydryl groups in proteins and affects the folding of these macromolecules, such oxidation also being promoted by cadmium and lead as well as selenium (Barbosa et al., 1998; Maciel et al., 2000). We suggest that activation of hsp83 is an attempt by cells to recover the correct shape of proteins disturbed by high selenium molarities. It is also possible that other stress related genes involved in the refolding of proteins (e.g. hsp70 and hsp23) could also be activated by diphenyl diselenide.

The increased viability seen by us when diphenyl diselenide was added to D. melanogaster culture medium below the toxic threshold concentration suggests that organic selenium compounds can be a source of necessary dietary selenium but, conversely, at levels higher than the threshold concentration diphenyl diselenide activates the stress responsive gene hsp83 in D. melanogaster larvae. Diselenides such as Ebselen and diphenyl diselenide have been used in pre-clinical trials for their pharmacological properties but our drosophila study has shown that at high molarities these compounds can promote activation of cellular stress protection systems, indicating that further research in this area is warranted. Since cellular stress mechanisms are highly conserved, we suggest that Drosophila can be a good model for studying the effects of selenium compounds.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Sídia Maria Callegari Jacques (Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) for help with the statistical analyses and the Brazilian agencies. Dr. Gilson Zeni (Departamento de Química, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, for diphenyl diselenide synthesis. Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS grant n. 04/1196.5) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for financial support.

 

References

Affleck JG, Neumann K, Wong L and Walker VK (2006) The effects of methotrexate on Drosophila development, female fecundity, and gene expression. Toxicol Sci 89:495-503.        [ Links ]

Ashburner M (2005) Drosophila: A Laboratory Handbook and Manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 1409 pp.        [ Links ]

Ballatori N and Villalobos AR (2002) Defining the molecular and cellular basis of toxicity using comparative models. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 183:207-220.        [ Links ]

Barbosa NV, Rocha JBT, Zeni G, Emanuelli T, Beque MC and Braga AL (1998) Effect of organic forms of Selenium on aminolevulinate dehydratase from liver, kidney, and brain of adult rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 149:243-253.        [ Links ]

Benjamini Y and Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc, Series B (Methodological) 57:289-300.        [ Links ]

Combs GF Jr and Combs SB (1986) Selenium and cancer. In: Combs GF Jr and Combs SB (eds) The Role of Selenium in Nutrition. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 413-462.        [ Links ]

Commandeur JN, Rooseboom M and Vermeulen NP (2001) Chemistry and biological activity of novel selenium-containing compounds. Adv Exp Med Biol 500:105-112.        [ Links ]

Engman L, Tunek A, Hallberg M and Hallberg A (1994) Catalytic effects of glutathione peroxidase mimetics on the thiol reduction of cytochrome c. Chem Biol Interact 93:129-137.        [ Links ]

Farina M, Frizzo MES, Soares FAA, Schwalm FD, Dietrich MO, Zeni G, Rocha JBT and Souza DO (2003) Ebselen protects against methylmercury-induced inhibition of glutamate uptake by cortical slices from adult mice. Toxicol Lett 144:351-357.        [ Links ]

Feder ME and Hofmann GE (1999) Heat-shock proteins, molecular chaperones, and the stress response: Evolutionary and ecological physiology. Annu Rev Physiol 61:243-282.        [ Links ]

Ghisleni G, Porciúncula LO, Cimarosti H, Rocha JBT, Salbego CG and Souza DO (2003) Diphenyl diselenide protects rat hippocampal slices submitted to oxygen-glucose deprivation and diminishes inducible nitric oxide synthase immunocontent. Brain Res 986:196-199.        [ Links ]

Harman AW, Adamson GM and Shaw SG (1992) Protection from oxidative damage in mouse liver cells. Toxicol Lett 64-65:581-587.        [ Links ]

Helzisouer K, Jacobs R and Morris S (1985) Acute selenium intoxication in the United States. Proc Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 44:1670.        [ Links ]

Jedlicka P, Mortin MA and Wu C (1997) Multiple functions of Drosophila heat shock transcription factor in vivo. EMBO J 16:2452-2462.        [ Links ]

King V and Tower J (1999) Aging-specific expression of Drosophila hsp22. Dev Biol 207:107-118.        [ Links ]

Klotz L and Sies H (2003) Defenses against peroxynitrite: Selenocompounds and flavonoids. Toxicol Lett 140:125-132.        [ Links ]

Kobayashi T, Ohta Y and Yoshino J (2001) Preventive effect of ebselen on acute gastric mucosal lesion development in rats treated with compound 48/80. Eur J Pharmacol 414:271-279.        [ Links ]

Kono H, Arteel GE, Rusyn I, Sies H and Thurman RG (2001) Ebselen prevents early alcohol-induced liver injury in rats. Free Rad Biol Med 30:403-411.        [ Links ]

Lange BMH, Bachi A, Wilm M and Gonzalez C (2000) Hsp90 is a core centrosomal component and is required at different stages of the centrosome cycle in Drosophila and vertebrates. EMBO J 19:1252-1262.        [ Links ]

Leal SM and Neckameyer WS (2002) Pharmacological evidence for GABAergic regulation of specific behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurobiol 50:245-261.        [ Links ]

Leibovitz B, Hu ML and Tappel AL (1990) Dietary supplements of vitamin E, beta-carotene, coenzyme Q10 and selenium protect tissues against lipid peroxidation in rat tissue slices. J Nutr 120:97-104.        [ Links ]

Lewgoy F and Cordeiro AR (1971) Ação genética e somática do selênio em Drosophila melanogaster. Cienc Cult 23:108.        [ Links ]

Lindquist S (1986) The heat shock response. Annu Rev Biochem 55:1151-1191.        [ Links ]

Maciel EN, Bolzan RC, Braga AL and Rocha JBT (2000) Diphenyl Diselenide and Diphenyl Ditelluride differentialy affect d-aminolevulinate dehydratase from liver, kidney and brain of mice. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 14:310-319.        [ Links ]

Martin-Romero FJ, Kryukov GV, Lobanov AV, Carlson BA, Lee BJ, Gladyshev VN and Hatfield DL (2001) Selenium metabolism in Drosophila: Selenoproteins, selenoprotein mRNA expression, fertility, and mortality. J Biol Chem 276:29798-29804.        [ Links ]

May SW (1999) Selenium-based drug design: Rationale and therapeutic potential. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 8:1017-1030.        [ Links ]

May SW (2002) Selenium-based pharmacological agents: An update. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 11:1261-1269.        [ Links ]

Meotti FC, Borges VC, Zeni G, Rocha JBT and Nogueira CW (2003) Potential renal and epatic toxicity of diphenyl diselenide, diphenyl ditelluride and Ebselen for rats and mice. Toxicol Lett 143:9-16.        [ Links ]

Meotti FC, Stangherlin E, Zeni G, Nogueira CW and Rocha JBT (2004) Protective role of aryl and alkyl diselenide on lipid peroxidation. Environ Res 94:276-282.        [ Links ]

Müller A, Cadenas E, Graf P and Sies H (1984) A novel biologically active seleno-organic compound-I. Glutathione peroxidase-like activity in vitro and antioxidant capacity of PZ 51 (Ebselen). Biochem Pharmacol 33:3235-3239.        [ Links ]

Navarro-Alarcon M and Lopez-Martinez MC (2000) Essentiality of selenium in the human body: Relationship with different diseases. The Sc Total Environ 249:347-371.        [ Links ]

Nogueira CW, Borges VC, Zeni G and Rocha JBT (2003) Organochalcogens effects on d-aminolevulinate dehydratase activity from human erythrocytic cells in vitro. Toxicology 191:169-178.        [ Links ]

Nogueira CW, Maciel EM, Zeni G, Graça D and Rocha JBT (2001) Biochemical toxicology of simple diorganoyl chalcogenides. ECSOC Electronic Conference on Synthetic Organic Chemistry. http://www.mdpi.net/ecsoc-5/d0013.        [ Links ]

Painter EP (1941) The chemistry and toxicity of selenium compounds, with special reference to the selenium problem. Chem Rev 28:179-213.        [ Links ]

Parnham MJ, Leyck S, Kuhl P, Schalkwijk J and Van Den Berg WB (1987) Ebselen: A new approach to the inhibition of peroxide-dependent inflammation. Int J Tissue React 9:45-50.        [ Links ]

Parsell DA and Lindquist S (1993) The function of heat-shock proteins in stress tolerance: Degradation and reactivation of damaged proteins. Annu Rev Genet 27:437-456.        [ Links ]

Paulmier C (1986) Selenoorganic functional groups. In: Paulmier C (ed) Selenium Reagents and Intermediates in Organic Synthesis. 1st ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 25-51.        [ Links ]

Picard D, Khursheed B, Garabedian MJ, Fortin MG, Lindquist S and Yamamoto KR (1990) Reduced levels of hsp90 compromise steroid receptor action in vivo Nature 348:166-168.        [ Links ]

Porciúncula LO, Rocha JBT, Boeck CR, Vendite D and Souza DO (2001) Ebselen prevents excitotoxicity provoked by glutamate in rat cerebellar granule neurons. Neurosci Lett 299:217-220.        [ Links ]

Rosenfeld I and Belth OA (1964) Selenium: Geobotany, Biochemistry, Toxicity and Nutrition. 1st edition. Academic Press, New York, 411 pp.        [ Links ]

Rossato JI, Ketzer LA, Centuriao FB, Silva SJ, Ludtke DS, Zeni G, Braga AL, Rubin MA and Rocha JBT (2002a) Antioxidant properties of new chalcogenides against lipid peroxidation in rat brain. Neurochem Res 27:297-303.        [ Links ]

Rossato JI, Zeni G, Mello CF, Rubin MA and Rocha JBT (2002b) Ebselen blocks the quinolinic acid-induced production of thiobarbituric acid reactive species but does not prevent the behavioral alterations produced by intra-striatal quinolinic acid administration in the rat. Neurosci Lett 318:137-140.        [ Links ]

Rubin GM, Yandell MD, Wortmann JR, Miklos GLG, Nelson CR, Hariharan IK, Fortini ME, Li PW, Apweiler R, Fleischmann W et al. (2000) Comparative genomics of eukaryotes. Science 287:2204-2215.        [ Links ]

Sørensen JG, Kristensen TN and Loeschcke V (2003) The evolutionary and ecological role of heat shock proteins. Ecol Lett 6:1025-1037.        [ Links ]

Sørensen JG, Nielsen MM, Kruhøffer M, Justesen J and Loeschcke V (2005) Full genome gene expression analysis of the heat stress response in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Stress Chaperones 10:312-328.        [ Links ]

Straten AVD, Rommel C, Dickson B and Hafen E (1997) The heat shock protein 83 (Hsp83) is required for Raf-mediated signalling in Drosophila. EMBO J 16:1961-1969.        [ Links ]

Tickoo S and Russell SS (2002) Drosophila melanogaster as a model system for drug discovery and pathway screening. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2:555-560.        [ Links ]

Walter R, Schwartz IL and Roy J (1972) Can selenoamino acids act as reversible biological antioxidants? Ann N Y Acad Sci 192:175-180.        [ Links ]

Westwood JT, Clos J and Wu C (1991) Stress-induced oligomerization and chromosomal relocalization of heat-shock factor. Nature 353:822-827.        [ Links ]

Wilber CG (1980) Toxicology of selenium: A Review. Clin Toxicol 17:171-230.        [ Links ]

Wilson SR and Zucker PA (1989) Development of synthetic compounds with glutathione peroxidase activity. J Am Chem Soc 111:5936-5939.        [ Links ]

Yang G, Wang S, Zhou R and Sun S (1983) Endemic selenium intoxication of humans in China. Am J Clin Nutr 37:872-881.        [ Links ]

 

 

Send correspondence to:
Élgion Lúcio da Silva Loreto
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Campus Universitário
Prédio 16-A, Bairro Camobi
97105-900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
E-mail: elgion.loreto@pq.cnpq.br

Received: February 1, 2007; Accepted: June 11, 2007.

 

 

Associate Editor: Carlos F.M. Menck