Genome re-assignment of Arachis trinitensis (Sect. Arachis, Leguminosae) and its implications for the genetic origin of cultivated peanut

Genome re-assignment of Arachis trinitensis (Sect. Arachis, Leguminosae) and its implications for the genetic origin of cultivated peanut

Germán Robledo^I,II; Graciela I. Lavia^I,III; Guillermo Seijo^I,II

^IInstituto de Botánica del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina

^IIFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina

^IIIFacultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Corrientes, Argentina

^{Send correspondence to}

ABSTRACT

The karyotype structure of Arachis trinitensis was studied by conventional Feulgen staining, CMA/DAPI banding and rDNA loci detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in order to establish its genome status and test the hypothesis that this species is a genome donor of cultivated peanut. Conventional staining revealed that the karyotype lacked the small "A chromosomes" characteristic of the A genome. In agreement with this, chromosomal banding showed that none of the chromosomes had the large centromeric bands expected for A chromosomes. FISH revealed one pair each of 5S and 45S rDNA loci, located in different medium-sized metacentric chromosomes. Collectively, these results suggest that A. trinitensis should be removed from the A genome and be considered as a B or non-A genome species. The pattern of heterochromatic bands and rDNA loci of A. trinitensis differ markedly from any of the complements of A. hypogaea, suggesting that the former species is unlikely to be one of the wild diploid progenitors of the latter.

Key words: CMA/DAPI bands, genome donors, peanut genetic origin, rDNA loci.

Introduction

The genus Arachis is native to South America and comprises 80 species arranged in nine sections (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994; Valls and Simpson, 2005). Section Arachis is the most numerous, with 30 wild diploid species (2n = 2x = 20, 2n = 2x = 18) and two allopolyploid entities (2n = 4x = 40), i.e., the cultigen A. hypogaea (peanut) and its presumed wild progenitor A. monticola (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994; Lavia, 1996, 2000; Peñaloza and Valls, 2005; Lavia et al., 2008). The geographic range of these species extends from the foothills of the Andes mountains in Bolivia and northern Argentina to the Atlantic coast in Brazil, and from the headwaters of the Mamoré and Guaporé rivers in northern Bolivia and Tocantins river in central Brazil to the northern coast of the La Plata river in Uruguay.

Based on cross-compatibility assays and chromosomal features, three genomes (A, B and D) have been designated in section Arachis (Smartt et al., 1978; Gregory and Gregory, 1979; Singh and Moss, 1982, 1984; Singh, 1986; Stalker, 1991; Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994; Singh and Smartt, 1998; Lavia et al., 2008). With the exception of A. glandulifera (D genome), all of the species have symmetric karyotypes (Stalker, 1991; Fernández and Krapovickcas, 1994; Lavia, 1998; Peñaloza and Valls, 2005; Lavia et al., 2009) and have been assigned to the A or B genomes. The A genome group is the most numerous and consists of 16 species. The karyotypes of these taxa are characterized by the presence of a small chromosomal pair, the "A chromosomes". These chromosomes are half the size of the longest chromosomes of the karyotype and have a diffuse coloration (except for the centromeric bands) in prophase and pro-metaphase. In general, the A genome species are karyotypically homogeneous, with similar patterns of heterochromatin distribution (Seijo et al., 2004; Robledo et al., 2009). The remaining species with symmetric karyotypes have traditionally been assigned to the B genome group (or non-A genome) because they lack the "A chromosomes". These species are more diverse in their karyotype formulas (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994; Lavia et al., 2009) and heterochromatin patterns (Seijo et al., 2004).

Arachis trinitensis (2n = 2x = 20) is an annual species that occurs in a very restricted island of cerrado-like vegetation in Trinidad, central Bolivia. This species is known from only a few individuals from each of three collection sites located in an area of less than 10 km². This distribution overlaps with two other species of the section, A. benensis and A. williamsii, both of which have the B genome, but individuals of these three species have never been found in sympatry (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994). Biogeographically, these three species are of particular interest in understanding the dispersion of the section since they occur on the north-western edge of the genus' natural range and are separated from other Arachis species by 200 km of seasonally flooded rainforest. For species with autogamy and geocarpic fruits like those of Arachis, this 200 km-wide tract of inappropriate habitat constitutes an unsurpassable barrier for gene flow and seed dispersion.

Within this group, A. trinitensis deserves special attention since previous chromosome reports assigned this species to the A genome group and suggested that it was a putative genome donor of the A genome of peanut (Lavia, 1996). The relative proximity of Trinidad (where some putative peanut ancestors grow) to Rurrenabaque in Beni, Bolivia (a center of high morphological diversity of A. hypogaea) (David Williams, personal communication) led to the proposal of an alternative center of origin for peanut. These considerations resulted in more extensive analyses of A. trinitensis in order to clarify its role in the genetic origin of A. hypogaea. A recently published analysis of Arachis species using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) positioned A. trinitensis close to A. benensis and other B genome group species (Milla et al., 2005). However, that cluster also included A. diogoi, a species that belongs to the A genome. Although not conclusive, these data questioned the genome identity of A. trinitensis and its involvement in the genetic origin of peanut.

In view of this genome uncertainty, and since heterochromatin analysis and mapping of DNA sequences by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have been useful in the genomic characterization of some Arachis species and for studying the genetic origin of peanut (Raina and Mukai, 1999; Seijo et al., 2004; Robledo and Seijo, 2008; Robledo et al., 2009), we used Feulgen staining, CMA-DAPI banding and rDNA detection by FISH to reassess the genomic identity of A. trinitensis and to establish whether this species should still be considered a potential genome donor of A. hypogaea.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

Three individuals from the type locality of A. trinitensis (Bolivia, Dept. Beni, Trinidad city, Williams 1117. CTES) were analyzed. This is the only accession that is maintained in germplasm banks, including the peanut germplasm collection of the Instituto de Botánica del Nordeste (Corrientes, Argentina).

Feulgen staining

Roots were obtained from seeds germinated in pots under laboratory conditions. Healthy root apices (5-10 mm long) were pre-treated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline for 3 h at room temperature (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994) and then fixed in absolute ethanol:glacial acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 12 h at 4 ºC prior to storage at -20 ºC. For conventional chromosome staining, fixed root apices were washed in distilled water for 5 min, hydrolyzed in 1 N HCl for 8 min at 60 ºC, stained with Schiff's reagent (Feulgen's technique) and then squashed in a drop of 2% acetic orcein. Permanent mounts were then performed using Euparal mounting medium.

Fluorochrome banding

Double staining with the fluorochromes CMA-DAPI was done according to Schweizer and Ambros (1994) with modifications. Fixed root apices were digested in 1% (w/v) cellulose (from Trichoderma viridae; Onozuka R-10, Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) plus 10% (v/v) pectinase dissolved in 40% glycerol (from Aspergillus niger, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), in 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 4.8, at 37 ºC for 2 h. Subsequently, the meristematic cells were removed from the root tip and squashed in 45% acetic acid. After removal of the coverslip with carbon dioxide, the slides were air-dried, aged for 1-2 days at room temperature and then kept at -20 ºC until used. Chromosomal preparations were stained first with CMA (chromomycin A3, 0.5 mg/mL) for 60 min and then with DAPI (4-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, 2 µg/mL) for 30 min, and finally mounted in McIlvaine's buffer (pH 7.0): glycerol (1:1, v/v) containing 5.5 mM MgCl₂.

rDNA detection

For in situ hybridization, root apices were enzymatically digested as described above. The 5S rDNA and 45S rDNA loci were localized using the pA5S, and pA18S and pA26S probes, respectively, isolated from genomic DNA of A. hypogaea (Robledo and Seijo, 2008) and labeled by nick translation with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) or biotin-11-dUTP (Sigma-Aldrich). The pretreatment of slides, chromosome and probe denaturation, conditions for the in situ hybridization (hybridization mixes contained DNA probes at a concentration of 2.5-3.5 ng/µL, with a stringency to allow sequences with 80%-85% identity to remain hybridized), post-hybridization washing, blocking and indirect detection with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies were done according to Moscone et al. (1996). The first set of antibodies consisted of mouse anti-biotin (Dakopatts, Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and sheep anti-digoxigenin conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Boehringer Mannheim). The second set of antibodies consisted of rabbit anti-mouse conjugated to tetramethyl-rodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) (Dakopatts) and FITC-conjugated rabbit antisheep (Dakopatts). The preparations were counterstained and mounted in Vectashield medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) containing DAPI (2 mg/mL). Counterstaining with DAPI revealed a C-banding-like pattern, with major heterochromatic bands fluorescing more intensely (cf. Seijo et al., 2004). Monochromatic pictures were taken for each fluorochrome, pseudocolored, and merged into one image using Leica Q-Win software.

Karyotype analysis

Five metaphase plates per individual were used for chromosomal measurements with the free version of MicroMeasure v. 3.3 software. The total chromosomal length of the haploid complement, mean length of each chromosome pair, centromeric index, relative length of each chromosome pair in relation to the largest chromosome pair, percentage of heterochromatin in each chromosome relative to their length, intrachromosomal asymmetry index (A1), and interchromosomal asymmetry index (A2) (Romero Zarco, 1986) were used to characterize the karyotype. The chromosomes were classified morphologically according to Levan et al. (1964). Data from homologous chromosomes were combined to obtain mean values, first between chromosomes in the same metaphase and then between the homologous chromosomes of all metaphases for the three individuals. The karyotype was constructed based on measurements obtained from metaphases stained by Feulgen's technique and the represented as a haploid complement in an idiogram. The chromosomes were arranged primarily by morphology and then by decreasing size. Satellite chromosomes (SAT chromosomes) were classified according to Fernández and Krapovickas (1994).

Results

The karyotype of A. trinitensis consisted exclusively of metacentric chromosomes. Chromosomal length ranged from 1.53 to 2.13 µm and the total length of the haploid complement was 18.32 ± 1.35 µm (mean ± SD, n = 5). Chromosomal size decreased gradually and none of the pairs corresponded to the small "A chromosomes". Intrachromosomal (A1 = 0.19) and interchromosomal (A2 = 0.10) asymmetry indices were low. All chromosomes showed homogeneous coloration and a similar condensation pattern during prophase and metaphase (Figure 1A,B). Only one pair of chromosomes with secondary constrictions was found in all of the metaphases analyzed. These constrictions were located proximally in the long arms of pair 5 (Figure 1A,B). Since the satellite was approximately the same size as the short arm, and the latter was larger than the proximal segment of the long arm (Figure 1C), SAT chromosomes were identified as type 6, according to the classification of Fernández and Krapovickas (1994).

Staining with fluorochromes revealed two small CMA⁺/DAPI^- bands located in the periNOR regions (Figure 2A) and DAPI⁺ heterochromatic bands in seven chromosome pairs (Figure 2B). The latter bands were located pericentromerically and accounted for 6.43-10.27% of the chromosomal length. The total amount of heterochromatin accounted for 5.89% of the karyotype length.

In situ hybridization showed one pair of 5S rDNA loci located paracentromerically on the short arms of medium-sized metacentric chromosomes, and one pair of 45S rDNA loci located proximally on the long arms of medium-sized metacentric chromosomes (Figure 2C).

Discussion

In this study, we first evaluated the genomic identity of A. trinitensis by comparing its karyotype with those of species with A and B genomes, and then examined the hypothesis that this species is a putative progenitor of A. hypogaea by comparing the chromosome markers detected so far in each of the chromosomal complements of the cultigen with those observed in A. trinitensis.

Basis for the genome re-assignment of A. trinitensis

Like most of the published karyotypes for species of the section Arachis (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994; Lavia, 1998, 2000; Lavia et al., 2009), the karyotype of A. trinitensis consists of ten pairs of small to medium size chromosomes, and lacks the principal marker chromosomes that define the A genome, i.e., the small "A chromosome" pair. The smallest pair of chromosomes in A. trinitensis had a length that corresponded to 72% of the largest chromosome pair, a value much greater than the 50% reported for "A chromosomes" (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994). Moreover, none of the chromosomes showed allocycly, which is one of the main features used to detect "A chromosomes" in somatic prophases and pro-metaphases (Fernández and Krapovickas, 1994). Additionally, the A2 asymmetry indices for Arachis species in the B genome group range from 0.08 to 0.13, while those for the A genome group range from 0.13 to 0.20 (Lavia et al., 2009; Robledo et al., 2009). Based on these values, the A2 asymmetry index of 0.10 for A. trinitensis agreed best with the B genome group. Thus, despite the initial suggestion that A. trinitensis belongs to the A genome (Lavia, 1996), Feulgen staining of metaphases did not support this conclusion but rather indicated that this species should be re-assigned to the B or non-A genome.

Fluorochrome staining, which reveals the distribution of heterochromatin and its base composition, was very informative for assigning A. trinitensis to a genome group in the section Arachis. In all of the taxa analyzed so far, the A chromosomes have a DAPI⁺ pericentromeric band that accounts for ~45% of the chromosome length (Seijo et al., 2004; Robledo et al., 2009). However, in A. trinitensis, none of the chromosomes had heterochromatic bands that accounted for more than 10.27% of the chromosome length. This finding for chromosomal banding was consistent with results obtained by conventional staining procedures which show that the A. trinitensis karyotype does not contain A chromosomes.

Although the location of CMA⁺/DAPI^- bands coincided with the secondary constriction (as is usual in Arachis species), DAPI⁺ banding revealed a very specific pattern of AT-rich heterochromatin distribution in the A. trinitensis karyotype. To date, two general patterns of karyotypic organization have been identified among species of the B genome group: those with large pericentromeric heterochromatic bands in all chromosomes, except in one pair, and those with no detectable heterochromatic bands in the entire karyotype (Seijo et al., 2004). The presence of small pericentromeric DAPI⁺ bands in seven chromosomal pairs in A. trinitensis is very peculiar and does not fit any of the patterns recorded to date for the B genome. The pattern described here therefore appears to be exclusive to this species and may be considered as a third karyotypic arrangement within the B or non-A genome group.

Evidence that A. trinitensis is unlikely to be a putative peanut progenitor

The fact that A. hypogaea has two subspecies and six botanical varieties has led to the hypothesis of different centers of origin, or at least different centers of domestication, with particular introgression events at each site. One of the traditional centers of origin is located in southeastern Bolivia and northwestern Argentina, where some populations of the wild tetraploid ancestor, A. monticola, still occur (Krapovickas and Gregory, 1994; Seijo et al., 2004, 2007). Other proposals for peanut origin include different locations in Peru and Bolivia and consider a spontaneous origin of allopolyploids both in the wild and in the orchards of ancient agricultures (Simpson and Faries, 2001). One of these alternative sites of origin is the region of Trinidad in north-central Bolivia, where three annual species are found. This was precisely the center where A. trinitensis, together with A. williamsii, was considered a putative diploid ancestor of peanut (Lavia, 1996).

Chromosomal analysis has shown that the amphidiploid A. hypogaea has two easily distinguishable genomes: the A genome, in which all of the chromosomes have pericentromeric heterochromatic bands, and the B genome, which is completely devoid of these bands (Seijo et al., 2004). In this context, the A genome donor must have provided all of the chromosomes with heterochromatic bands, while the B genome donor must have provided a complement without heterochromatic bands. Consequently, the presence of heterochromatic bands in seven pairs of chromosomes in A. trinitensis is strong evidence that this species is unlikely to have been involved in the genetic origin of peanut.

FISH analysis has shown that the A genome of A. hypogaea has one 5S and two 45S rDNA loci, whereas the B genome has one 5S and three 45S rDNA loci per haploid complement (Seijo et al., 2004). Although a loss or gain of rDNA loci in polyploids relative to the parental plants has been observed in angiosperms (Pontes et al., 2004), the Arachis genomes show strong quiescence after polyiploidyzation (Seijo et al., 2004, 2007). Thus, the pattern found in A. trinitensis, with only one locus for each rDNA gene family, differs from what would be expected in the peanut genome donors.

In conclusion, the results of Feulgen staining, chromosome banding and rDNA detection indicate that A. trinitensis should be removed from the A genome group, and that the hypothesis that this species is a putative contributor to the peanut genome must be rejected.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnica (PICT 2005 no. 34458), Argentina and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (PIP no. 5807).

Internet Resources

MicroMeasure 3.3 program, http://www.colostate.edu/Depts/Biology/MicroMeasure.

Received: October 20, 2009; Accepted: May 20, 2010.

Associate Editor: Marcelo Guerra

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

• Fernández A and Krapovickas A (1994) Cromosomas y evolución en Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 8:187-220.
• Gregory MP and Gregory WC (1979) Exotic germoplasm of Arachis L. interspecific hybrids. J Hered 70:185-193.
• Krapovickas A and Gregory WC (1994) Taxonomía del género Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 8:1-186.
• Lavia GI (1996) Estudios cromosómicos en Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 9:111-120.
• Lavia GI (1998) Karyotypes of Arachis palustris and A. praecox (section Arachis), two species with basic chromosome number x = 9. Cytologia 63:177-181.
• Lavia GI (2000) Chromosome studies of wild Arachis (Leguminosae). Caryologia 53:177-181.
• Lavia GI, Fernández A and Seijo JG (2008) Cytogenetic and molecular evidences on the evolutionary relationships among Arachis species. In: Sharma AK and Sharma A (eds) Plant Genome. Biodiversity and Evolution. Volume 1E. Phanerogam - Angiosperm. Science Publishers, Calcutta, pp 101-134.
• Lavia GI, Ortiz A and Fernández A (2009) Karyotypic studies in wild germplasm of Arachis (Leguminosae). Genet Res Crop Evol 56:755-764.
• Levan A, Fredga K and Sandberg AA (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201-220.
• Milla SR, Isleib TG and Stalker HT (2005) Taxonomic relationships among Arachis sect. Arachis species as revealed by AFLP markers. Genome 48:1-11.
• Peñaloza A and Valls JFM (2005) Chromosome number and satellited chromosome morphology of eleven species of Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 14:65-72.
• Pontes O, Neves N, Silva M, Lewis MS, Madlung A, Comai L, Viegas W and Pikaard CS (2004) Chromosomal locus rearrangements are a rapid response to formation of the allotetraploid Arabidopsis suecica genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18240-18245.
• Raina SN and Mukai Y (1999) Detection of a variable number of 18S-5.8S-26S and 5S ribosomal DNA loci by fluorescent in situ hybridization in diploid and tetraploid Arachis species. Genome 42:52-59.
• Robledo G and Seijo JG (2008) Characterization of Arachis D genome using physical mapping of heterochromatic regions and rDNA loci by FISH. Genet Mol Biol 31:717-724.
• Robledo G, Lavia GI and Seijo G (2009) Species relations among wild Arachis species with the A genome as revealed by FISH mapping of rDNA loci and heterochromatin detection. Theor Appl Genet 118:1295-1307.
• Romero Zarco C (1986) A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. Taxon 35:526-530.
• Schweizer D and Ambros PF (1994) Chromosome banding. In: Gosden JR (ed) Methods in Molecular Biology. Volume 29. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 97-112.
• Seijo JG, Lavia GI, Fernández A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse D and Moscone EA (2004) Physical mapping of 5S and 18S-25S rRNA genes evidences that Arachis duranensis and A. ipaensis are the wild diploid species involved in the origin of A. hypogaea (Leguminosae). Am J Bot 91:1294-1303.
• Seijo JG, Lavia GI, Fernández A, Krapovickas A, Ducasse DA, Bertioli DJ and Moscone EA (2007) Genomic relationships between the cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea, Leguminosae) and its close relatives revealed by double GISH. Am J Bot 94:1963-1971.
• Simpson CE and Faries MJ (2001) Advances in the characterization of diversity in section Arachis: Archeological evidence, crossing results and their relationship in understanding the origin of Arachis hypogaea L. In: Abstracts of III SIRGEALC Simpósio de Recursos Genéticos para a America Latina e Caribe. Instituto Agronômico do Paraná, Londrina, pp 103-104.
• Singh AK (1986) Utilization of wild relatives in the genetic improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. Part 8. Synthetic amphidiploids and their importance in interspecific breeding. Theor Appl Genet 72:433-439.
• Singh AK and Moss JP (1982) Utilization of wild relatives in genetic improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. 2. Chromosome complements of species of section Arachis Theor Appl Genet 61:305-314.
• Singh AK and Moss JP (1984) Utilization of wild relatives in genetic improvement of Arachis hypogaea L. 5. Genome analysis in section Arachis and its implications in gene transfer. Theor Appl Genet 68:355-364.
• Singh AK and Smartt J (1998) The genome donors of the groundnut/peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) revisited. Genet Res Crop Evol 45:113-118.
• Smartt J, Gregory WC and Gregory MP (1978) The genomes of Arachis hypogaea 1. Cytogenetic studies of putative genome donors. Euphytica 27:665-675.
• Stalker HT (1991) A new species section Arachis of peanuts with D genome. Am J Bot 78:630-637.
• Valls JFM and Simpson CE (2005) New species of Arachis from Brazil, Paraguay, and Bolivia. Bonplandia 14:35-64.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  24 Sept 2010
• Date of issue
  2010

History

• Received
  20 Oct 2009
• Accepted
  20 May 2010