Services on Demand
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Print version ISSN 1415-4757
Genet. Mol. Biol. vol.33 no.4 São Paulo 2010 Epub Nov 12, 2010
Ozge KarakasI; Filiz GurelII; Ahu Altinkut UncuogluI
IThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Marmara Research Center, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Institute, Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey
IIDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
Expressed sequence tag (EST) markers have been used to assess variety and genetic diversity in wheat (Triticum aestivum). In this study, 1549 ESTs from wheat infested with yellow rust were used to examine the genetic diversity of six susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars. The aim of using these cultivars was to improve the competitiveness of public wheat breeding programs through the intensive use of modern, particularly marker-assisted, selection technologies. The F2 individuals derived from cultivar crosses were screened for resistance to yellow rust at the seedling stage in greenhouses and adult stage in the field to identify DNA markers genetically linked to resistance. Five hundred and sixty ESTs were assembled into 136 contigs and 989 singletons. BlastX search results showed that 39 (29%) contigs and 96 (10%) singletons were homologous to wheat genes. The database-matched contigs and singletons were assigned to eight functional groups related to protein synthesis, photosynthesis, metabolism and energy, stress proteins, transporter proteins, protein breakdown and recycling, cell growth and division and reactive oxygen scavengers. PCR analyses with primers based on the contigs and singletons showed that the most polymorphic functional categories were photosynthesis (contigs) and metabolism and energy (singletons). EST analysis revealed considerable genetic variability among the Turkish wheat cultivars resistant and susceptible to yellow rust disease and allowed calculation of the mean genetic distance between cultivars, with the greatest similarity (0.725) being between Harmankaya99 and Sönmez2001, and the lowest (0.622) between Aytin98 and Izgi01.
Key words: biodiversity, EST, genetic diversity, Triticum, yellow rust.
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the most important crops in the world and is grown in all agricultural regions of Turkey. The total area cultivated worldwide and in Turkey is 210 and 9.4 million ha, respectively (Zeybek and Yigit, 2004). The allohexaploid wheat genome (2n = 6x = 42) is one of the largest among crop species, with a haploid size of 16 billion bp (Bennett and Leitch, 1995), and its genetics and genome organization have been extensively studied using molecular markers (Yu et al., 2004; Ercan et al., 2010; Akfirat-Senturk et al., 2010).
PCR-based molecular markers such as simple sequence repeats (SSR) (Plaschke et al., 1995), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Nagaoka and Ogihara, 1997), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Gülbitti-Onarici et al., 2007), selective amplification of microsatellite polymorphic loci (SAMPL) (Altintas et al., 2008) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) (Asif et al., 2005) are easy to use and show a high degree of polymorphism. A number of wheat genetic maps have been constructed using PCR based markers (Li et al., 2007).
In recent year, expressed-sequence tags (ESTs) have become a valuable tool for genomic analyses and are currently the most widely used approach for sequencing plant genomes, both in terms of the number of sequences and total nucleotide counts (Rudd, 2003). EST analysis provides a simple strategy for studying the transcribed regions of genomes, and renders complex, highly redundant genomes such as that of wheat amenable to large-scale analysis. The number of ESTs and cDNA sequences in public databases such as GenBank has increased exponentially in recent few years, and EST-based markers have been used to distinguish varieties and assess genetic diversity in wheat (Kantety et al., 2002; Leigh et al., 2003).
Yellow rust, a destructive disease of wheat triggered by the biotrophic fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Chen 2005), is the most frequent and important cereal disease in Turkey, where it causes grain yield losses of 40%-60% and lowers the quality of cereal products (Zeybek and Yigit, 2004). In this study, an EST database for yellow rust-infested wheat was used, in conjunction with a multi-variate statistical package (MVSP v.3.1), to assess the genetic diversity of yellow rust resistant and susceptible wheat genotypes. For this, EST sequences were assembled into longer contiguous sequences (contigs) using Vector NTI 10.0 software. Difficulties related to sequencing errors and the determination of orthology associated with the use of ESTs for systematics can be minimized by using several reads to assemble contigs and EST clusters for each region (Parkinson et al., 2002; Torre et al., 2006). The knowledge gained about the genetic constitution and relationships of genotypes using this approach should prove useful in the optimization of wheat breeding programs.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and evaluations
Six homozygous bread wheat genotypes (three yellow rust-resistant cultivars: PI178383, Izgi01, Sönmez2001, and three yellow rust-susceptible cultivars: Harmankaya99, ES14, Aytin98) were obtained from the Anatolian Agricultural Research Institute, Eskisehir, Turkey. The resistance of the parental cultivars and F2 generation was tested in greenhouses by applying uredospores. Two weeks after the inoculation the infection was scored on a scale of 0-9 (McNeal et al., 1971), with scores of 0-6 indicating a low infection and 7-9 indicating a high infection. The disease score for PI178383, Izgi01 and Sönmez2001 was 0 while that of Harmankaya99, ES14 and Aytin98 was 8, this confirming the resistance and susceptibility of the parental genotypes.
Analysis of wheat yellow rust ESTs
ESTs from a yellow rust-infected wheat cDNA library (TA117G1X) were selected from the GrainGenes website and processed by means of VecScreen database searches to remove undesired vector fragments from the sequences. The Vector NTI 10.0 contig express program (InforMax, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to construct contig tags from the EST sequences and the Contig Express module was used to assemble small fragments in text or chromatogram formats into contigs (Lu and Moriyama, 2004). Singletons were constructed from unassembled ESTs. The EST sequences were aligned and analyzed with ClustalW v.1.82 to identify conserved domains. Functional annotation was done using the BlastX algorithm of the Basic Alignment Search Tool (Altschul et al., 1990). PCR primers for the contigs and singletons selected for further characterization were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 and Primer 3.0 software (Figure 1). EST-derived contig and singleton primers were used to assess the genetic diversity of the six wheat genotypes.
PCR analyses of contigs and singletons
Total genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of resistant and susceptible plants using the method of Weining and Langridge (1991) as modified by Song and Henry (1995). Genomic DNA amplifications with sense and antisense primers were done using a PTC-100 MJ thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA) in a 25 µL reaction volume. Each reaction contained 1X Taq buffer (MBI Fermentas, Germany), 2.5 mM MgCl2 (MBI Fermentas), 0.2 mM dNTP (MBI Fermentas), 400 nM of forward primer, 400 nM of reverse primer, 0.625 U of Taq polymerase/µL (MBI Fermentas) and 100 ng of genomic DNA. The thermal cycling parameters were: 3 min at 94 ºC (initial denaturation), 37 cycles of 1 min at 94 ºC, 1 min at 40-58 ºC (depending on the annealing temperature) and 1 min at 72 ºC, followed by a final extension at 72 ºC for 10 min. PCR products were separated in 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and examined under UV light.
Genetic similarity estimation and cluster analyses
Each contig and singleton band was scored as absent (0) or present (1) for the different cultivars and the data were entered into a binary matrix as discrete variables ('1' for presence and '0' for absence of a homologous fragment). Only distinct, reproducible, well-resolved fragments were scored and the data were analyzed using MVSP 3.1 software (Kovach, 1999). This software package was also used to calculate Jaccard (1908) similarity coefficients to construct a dendrogram by a neighbour-joining algorithm.
Assembly of contigs and blast analysis
Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the database used in this analysis. 1549 ESTs were selected from a yellow rust-infested wheat cDNA library (TA117G1X) and used to assemble 136 contigs. The number of individual ESTs belonging to each contig ranged from 2 to 57. Singletons were derived from unassembled ESTs and accounted for 72.63% of ESTs. Tables 2 and 3 show the results of the NCBI database searches done using the contig and singleton sequences. The BlastX searches revealed that 39 contigs (29%) were homologous to wheat genes (Figure 2). Contigs 3, 4, 11, 13, 16 and 112 did not match any organism. Contig 77 matched a sequence of unknown function (data not shown) while other contigs (71%) showed homology to genes of known function. The BlastX search also showed that 96 singletons (10%) were homologous to wheat genes (Figure 3), whereas 147 singletons (14%) did not match any organism and had no functional annotation (data not shown). The 39 contigs and 96 singletons that matched wheat proteins were assigned to eight functional groups that included protein synthesis, photosynthesis, metabolism and energy, stress proteins, transporter proteins, protein breakdown and recycling, cell growth and division and reactive oxygen scavengers. Photosynthesis was the major functional category of contigs, with nine proteins (22%), whereas cell growth and division was the smallest, with one protein (3%) (Figure 2). Metabolism was the major functional category of singletons, with 37 proteins (38%), whereas protein breakdown and recycling and cell growth and divison were the smallest functional categories, with three proteins (3%) (Figure 3). Tables 4 and 5 show the sense and antisense primers used to assess the genetic diversity of wheat cultivars; these primers were designed based on the contig and singleton sequences that were homologous to wheat genes.
EST-derived contig and singleton polymorphisms
PCR analyses with the contig and singleton primers showed that the most polymorphic functional categories were photosynthesis (30%) and metabolism and energy (46%) for contigs and singletons, respectively (Figures 4 and 5). Of the 39 contig and 92 singleton primers used to characterize the genetic diversity of the six wheat genotypes, 14 contig and 48 singleton primers were polymorphic in susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars. Table 6 summarizes the mean genetic distance and genetic identity between the cultivars as determined by MVSP 3.1. Pairwise within-group distances ranged from 0 to 0.725, with the highest similarity (0.725) occurring between Harmankaya99 and Sönmez2001 and the lowest (0.622) between Aytin98 and Izgi01.
Figure 6 shows the dendrogram based on the similarity index (Jaccard's coefficient) of the six cultivars. Two main clusters were observed, the first of which included cultivars Aytin98 and ES14 while the second was divided into two subclusters, the first of which comprised PI178383 while the second contained Izgi01, Sönmez2001 and Harmankaya99. The latter subcluster consisted a group containing Izgi01 and another containing Sönmez2001 and Harmankaya99. The construction of this dendrogram demonstrates the ability of EST-derived contigs and singletons in detecting extensive genetic diversity in genotypes with an expected narrow genetic pool.
Genome-marker technologies are particularly valuable for analyzing crops, such as wheat, that have relatively low levels of genetic diversity (Plaschke et al., 1995). DNA markers such as AFLP (Gülbitti-Onarici et al., 2007), RAPD (Asif et al., 2005), EST-SSR (Leigh et al., 2003), SSRs (Chen, 2005) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) (Zhang et al., 2002) are the most convenient data sources. EST databases represent a potentially valuable resource for developing molecular markers for evolutionary studies. Since EST-derived markers come from transcribed regions of the genome they are likely to be conserved across a broader taxonomic range than other types of markers (Pashley et al., 2006).
The low level of genetic diversity expected between self-pollinating plants means that EST databases can be useful tools for genetic studies in wheat and related species. Our results indicate that EST-derived primers were good tools for assessing the genetic diversity in wheat cultivars. A relatively high level of polymorphism (58.61% of loci were polymorphic) was observed with 39 contig and 92 singleton primers across the six wheat genotypes, despite the fact that all of them were local cultivars from geographically close locations. Several other studies have reported polymorphism in self-pollinating plants, including tef (4%) (Bai et al., 1999), azuki (18%) (Yee et al., 1999), rice (22%) (Maheswaran et al., 1997), sugar beet (50%) (Schondelmaier et al., 1996) and wild barley (76%) (Pakniyat et al., 1997). In a work similar to that reported here, Wei et al. (2005) used microsatellite markers to assess the polymorphic divergence in wheat landraces highly resistant to Fusarium head blight (FHB). The level of polymorphism observed among 20 wheat landraces resistant to FHB and four wheat landraces susceptible to FHB was 97.5% with a mean genetic similarity index among the 24 genotypes of 0.419 (range: 0.103 to 0.673).
In conclusion, we have used an EST database to examine the genetic diversity among Turkish wheat cultivars resistant and susceptible to yellow rust disease. Our results indicate that EST databases can be used to assess genetic diversity and identify suitable parents in populational studies designed to detect genes related to disease resistance.
The authors thank Dr. Selma Onarici for her helpful comments, Dr. Necmettin Bolat for providing plant material and Central Research Institute of Field Crops for performing pathogenity tests. This study is a part of a PhD thesis ("Investigation of yellow rust disease resistance in winter-type bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using biotechnological methods") by Ozge Karakas done at the Institute of Sciences and Research Foundation (project no. 1832), Istanbul University. This work was supported by TUBITAK KAMAG (project no. 105G075).
Akfrat-Senturk F, Aydn Y, Ertugrul F, Hasancebi S, Budak H, Akan K, Mert Z, Bolat N and Uncuoglu-Altnkut A (2010) A microsatelite marker for yellow rust resistance in wheat. Cereal Research Communications 38:203-210. [ Links ]
Altnta S, Toklu F, Kafkas S, Kilian B, Brandolini A and Özkan H (2008) Estimating genetic diversity in drum and bread wheat cultivars from Turkey using AFLP and SAMPL markers. Plant Breed 127:9-14. [ Links ]
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW and Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403-410. [ Links ]
Asf M, Rahman MU and Zafar Y (2005) DNA fingerprinting studies of some wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Pak J Bot 37:271-277. [ Links ]
Bai G, Tefera H, Ayele M and Ngujen HT (1999) A genetic linkage map of tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] based on amplified fragment length polymorphism. Theor Appl Genet 99:599-604. [ Links ]
Bennett MD and Leitch IJ (1995) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Ann Bot 76:113-176. [ Links ]
Chen XM (2005) Epidemiology and control of stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) on wheat. Can J Plant Pathol 27:314-337. [ Links ]
Ercan S, Ertugrul F, Aydin Y, Akfirat-Senturk F, Hasancebi S, Akan K, Mert Z, Bolat N, Yorgancilar O and Uncuoglu-Altinkut AA (2010) An EST-SSR marker linked with yellow rust resistance in wheat. Biol Plant (in press). [ Links ]
Gülbitti-Onarici S, Sümer S and Özcan S (2007) Determination of phylogenetic relationships between some wild wheat species using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Bot J Linn Soc 153:67-72. [ Links ]
Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 44:223-270. [ Links ]
Kantety RV, Rota ML, Matthews DE and Sorrells MS (2002) Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Mol Biol 48:501-510. [ Links ]
Kovach WL (1999) MVSP A Multivariate Statistical Package for Windows, v. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, 133 pp. [ Links ]
Leigh F, Lea V, Law J, Wolters P, Powell W and Donini P (2003) Assessment of EST- and genomic microsatellite markers for variety discrimination and genetic diversity studies in wheat. Euphytica 133:359-366. [ Links ]
Li S, Jia J, Wei X, Zhang X, Li L, Chen H, Fan Y, Sun H, Zhao X, Lei T et al. (2007) An intervarietal genetic map and QTL analysis for yield traits in wheat. Mol Breed 20:167-178. [ Links ]
Lu G and Moriyama NE (2004) Vector NTI, a balanced all-in-one sequence analysis suite. Brief Bioinform 5:378-388. [ Links ]
Maheswaran M, Subudhi PK, Nandi S, Xu JC, Parco A, Yang DC and Huang N (1997) Polymorphism, distribution and segregation of AFLP markers in doubled haploid rice population. Theor Appl Genet 94:39-45. [ Links ]
McNeal FM, Conzak CF, Smith EP, Tade WS and Russell TS (1971) A uniform system for recording and processing cereal research data. US Agricultural Research Survice 42:34-121. [ Links ]
Nagaoka T and Ogihara Y (1997) Applicability of nter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in wheat for use as DNA markers in comparison to RFLP and RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 94:597-602. [ Links ]
Pakniyat H, Powell W, Baird E, Handley LL, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Nevo E, Hackett CA, Caligari PDS and Forster BP (1997) AFLP variation in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum C. Kock) with reference to salt tolerance and associated ecogeography. Genome 40:332-341. [ Links ]
Parkinson J, Guiliano DB and Blaxter M (2002) Making sense of EST sequences by CLOBBing them. BMC Bioinformatics 3:31. [ Links ]
Pashley CH, Ellis JR, McCauley DE and Burke JM (2006) EST databases as a source for molecular markers: Lessons from Helianthus. J Hered 97:381-388. [ Links ]
Plaschke J, Ganal MW and Röder MS (1995) Detection of genetic diversity in closely related bread wheat using microsatellite markers. Theor Appl Genet 91:1001-1007. [ Links ]
Rudd S (2003) Expressed sequence tags: Alternative or complement to whole genome sequences? Trends Plant Sci 8:321-328. [ Links ]
Schondelmaier J, Streinrucken G and Jung C (1996) Integration of AFLP markers into a linkage map of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Breed 115:231-237. [ Links ]
Song W and Henry RJ (1995) Molecular analysis of the DNA polymorphism of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) germplasm using the polymerase chain reaction. Genet Resourc Crop Evol 42:273-280. [ Links ]
Torre J, Egan MG, Katari MS, Brenner ED, Stevenson DW, Coruzzi GM and DeSalle R (2006) ESTimating plant phylogeny: Lessons from partitioning. BMC Evol Biol 6:48. [ Links ]
Wei YM, Hou YC, Yan ZH, Wu W, Zhang ZQ and Liu DC (2005) Microsatellite DNA polymorphism divergence in Chinese wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) landraces highly resistant to Fusarium head blight. J Appl Genet 46:3-9. [ Links ]
Weining S and Langridge P (1991) Identification and mapping of polymorphisms in cereals based on the polymerase chain reaction. Theor Appl Genet 82:209-216. [ Links ]
Yee E, Kidwell KK, Sills GR and Lumpkin TA (1999) Diversity among selected Vigna angularis (Azuki) accessions on the basis of RAPD and AFLP markers. Crop Sci 39:268-275. [ Links ]
Yu JK, Dake TM, Singh S, Benscher D, Li W, Gill B and Sorrels ME (2004) Development and mapping of EST-derived simple sequence repeat markers for hexaploid wheat. Genome 47:805-818. [ Links ]
Zeybek A and Yigit F (2004) Determination of virulence genes frequencies in wheat stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) populations during natural epidemics in the regions of southern Aegean and western Mediterranean in Turkey. Pak J Biol Sci 7:1967-1971. [ Links ]
Zhang W, Qu LJ, Gu H, Gao W and Liu M (2002) Studies on the origin and evolution of tetraploid wheats based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Theor Appl Genet 104:1099-1106. [ Links ]
GrainGenes. http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/cgi-bin/westsql/est_lib.cgi (August 15, 2007).
VecScreen database. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/VecScreen/VecScreen.html (September 20, 2007).
ClustalW v.1.82. http://www.ebi.ac.uk (November 22, 2007).
Send correspondence to:
Ahu Altinkut Uncuoglu
Deputy Director of the Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Institute
Marmara Research Center, TUBITAK, P.O. Box 21
41470 Gebze-Kocaeli, Turkey
Received: October 29, 2009; Accepted: June 24, 2010.
Associate Editor: Luciano da Fontoura Costa
License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.