An effective homologous cloning method for isolating novel miR172s from Phalaenopsis hybrida

An effective homologous cloning method for isolating novel miR172s from Phalaenopsis hybrida

Ying Ying Han^I,II,*; Qin Hua Yan^I,*; Feng Ming^I

^IState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Institute of Genetics, Institute of Plant Biology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

^IICenter of Systematic Biomedical Research, College of Medical Appliance and Food Sciences, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China

^{Send correspondence to}

ABSTRACT

MiR172 is an important microRNA that regulates floral development in various plants and downregulates AP2 family members to relieve the stress on floral determinacy, leading to phase transition from vegetative to reproductive growth. In this work, PCR with primers designed based on the rice miR172 sequence was used to isolate two miR172-like transcripts from Phalaenopsis hybrida (PhmiR172-1 and PhmiR172-2) that were very similar to Oryza miR172d and Arabidopsis miR172b. RT-PCR indicated that the levels of these two transcripts were negatively correlated with the level of the Phalaenopsis AP2 (PhAP2) gene in stem, root, pedicel and sepal, and that both were co-expressed with PhAP2 in young buds. Overproduction of PhmiR172-2 in Arabidopsis led to early flowering. The homologous cloning method used to isolate the Phalaenopsis miR172-like transcripts can be used to isolate miRNAs from other species. These PhmiR172 transcripts may be used to accelerate the flowering of orchids.

Key words: homologous cloning, miR172, miRNA, Phalaenopsis, sequence conservation.

Introduction

MicroRNAs, non-coding RNAs 21-23 bp in size, are critical developmental factors in animals and plants (Bartel, 2004) that were originally thought to transcriptionally down-regulate target genes without reducing the amount of corresponding target RNA (Lee et al., 1993). Later studies showed that miRNAs can also degrade mRNA directly (Llave et al., 2002; Yekta et al., 2004; Allen et al., 2005; Bagga et al., 2005). MicroRNAs are a key factor in maintaining the homeostasis of some transcriptional control pathways and make gene expression more precise (Achard et al., 2004; Chiou et al., 2006).

In plants, many miRNAs are involved in the precise control of flowering time because of its roles in sexual reproduction and maintenance of the species. Many miRNAs are involved in maintaining phase transition, e.g., miR156 targets SPLs (squamosa promoter binding protein-like) (Schwab et al., 2005), miR159 (phytohormone pathway) directs the cleavage of MYB33 transcripts, resulting in the repression of LEAFY (Achard et al., 2004), and miR172 promotes floral transition by repressing the expression of AP2 members (Park et al., 2002; Aukerman and Sakai 2003).

MicroR172 participates in the photoperiod pathway and is positively regulated by GI (GIGANTEA)inan age-dependent rather than rhythmic manner (Jung et al., 2007). MiR156 regulates SPL9 and SPL10 that control the expression of miR172 by directly promoting the transcription of miR172b (Wu et al., 2009). In addition, miR172 can affect floral organ identity (Zhao et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2009; Zhu and Helliwell, 2011), possibly through a function of AP2, an A-class gene that specifies perianth organs (Parcy et al., 1998; Wollmann et al., 2010).

The positive effect of miR172 on the induction of flowering makes it a potential target gene for commercial flowering plants. However, miR172 has not been isolated from important ornamental plants because precursor sequences are not as conserved as protein coding genes (Griffiths-Jones et al., 2006), although miR172 transcripts have been identified in many kinds of plants, including tobacco (Kasai et al., 2010), maize (Chuck et al., 2007), apples (Gleave et al., 2010), morning glory (Glazinska et al., 2009) and potato (Martin et al., 2009; Hwang et al., 2011).

Phalaenopsis is an important horticultural plant with a long vegetative period of at least 15 months. These plants flower only under strict temperature, humidity and photoperiod conditions, which makes them more expensive. In an attempt to shorten the flowering time of Phalaenopsis, two novel miR172 transcripts of Phalaenopsis hybrida were isolated by RT-PCR and characterized. These miR172 transcripts should be useful in genetic engineering of the phase transition in Phalaenopsis species. The homologous cloning method described here can also be used to isolate other pre-miRNAs from non-model organisms.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

Phalaenopsis hybrida (~20 months old) was grown in a greenhouse under standard conditions (16/8 h light/dark cycle at 25-28 ºC).

Amplification of Phalaenopsis miR172 sequences

Genomic DNA extracted from leaf tissue according to the method of Dellaporta et al. (1983) was used as a template for PCR amplification under the following conditions: 5 min at 94 ºC for initial denaturation, followed by 30 cycles of30 s at 94 ºC,60 s at 55 ºC and 90 s at 72 ºC with a 10 min extension at 72 ºC. The primers used for PCR were designed against conserved miR172 sequences (enzyme restriction sites and protective bases are underlined): Forward -5'-GCCAAGCTTGTGTTTGCGGGCGTGGCA TCATCAAGATTC-3' and Reverse -5'-GCGAGCTCTT GTCTGCGGATGCAGCATCATCAAGAT-3'.

Sequencing and analysis of Phalaenopsis miR172s

The PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T vectors (Promega, USA) for identification and sequencing. The secondary structures of identified miRNA precursors were predicted with the software RNA fold. The miR172 sequences from Aegilops tauschii, Arabidopsis thaliana, Brachypodium distachyon, Elaeis guineensis, Glycine max, Manihot esculenta, Oryza sativa, Phalaenopsis hybrida, Populus trichocarpa, Solanum tuberosum, Sorghum bicolor and Vitis vinifera were aligned using CLUSTAL X software (Thompson et al., 1994). Table 1 shows the name and GenBank number of the miR172s from O. sativa (OsmiR172) and A. thaliana. Phylogenetic analysis was done with Mega5.0 software.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from root, stem, leaf, pedicel, bud, sepal, petal, labellum and pistil of P. hybrida using RNAiso Plus (Takara). After treatment with DNase I, 1 µg of total RNA was used to synthesize first strand cDNA using a PrimerScript reverse transcriptase kit (Takara). Sequence alignment was used to design a pair of primers to amplify the Phalaenopsis AP2 gene. The primer sequences and PCR conditions used are listed in Table 2. All of the reactions were initiated with a 5 min denaturation at 94 ºC.

Transgenic Arabidopsis

The newly identified PhmiR172 sequences were cloned into the pHB vector (Ren et al., 2005) for constitutive expression, and new blossomed flowers of Arabidopsis were infected with Agrobacterium strain EHA10535S::PhmiR172. The seeds of transgenic plants were screened in hygromycin (0.5 mg/mL). Vegetative days and rosette leaf number before flowering were counted in wild-type and T₃ plants. The experiment was carried out with three independent occasions with n = 3/group each time. RNA was extracted with RNAiso Plus (Takara) from T₃ plants, followed by treatment with DNase I and cDNA synthesis. The primers and PCR conditions for the Phalaenopsis genes and the internal control are described in Table 1.

Results

Isolation and sequence analysis of Phalaenopsis miR172

Since Phalaenopsis is monocotyledonous primers were designed based on the sequences of rice miR172s. The stem sequences of rice miR172s were aligned (Figure 1) and the core regions of miRNA and miRNA* were found to be conserved, which facilitated the PCR cloning.

Two novel Phalaenopsis miR172-like (PhmiR172) sequences of different lengths were isolated by PCR using genomic DNA as the template (Figure 2A). Random amplification resulted in fragments of different lengths: the 100-bp fragment was referred to as PhmiR172-1 and the 250-bp fragment as PhmiR172-2. Sequence analysis was undertaken before characterizing the function of these fragments by expression analysis and in transgenic plants. The predicted secondary structures of the two PhmiR172 precursors had a unique stem-loop region (Figure 2C) and shared a number of identical nucleotides, in addition to the region matching the primers (Figure 2B).

 

The stem loop sequences of miR172 from 12 species, along with PhmiR172-1 and PhmiR172-2, were subjected to phylogenetic analysis (Figure 2D). The regions matching the primer sequences were removed from the Phalaenopsis miR172s to prevent false clustering with OsmiR172. The two PhmiR172s were closely related to the miR172sof most other species and formed a major highly-related cluster that included most of the miR172s studied. Although the main cluster included miR172s from all of the species, several miR172s from seven species diverged from the main branch, including Oryza 172b/c, Vitis miR172a/b/c and others (Figure 2D).

Expression of PhmiR172 and Phalaenopsis AP2

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was used to examine the expression pattern of miR172 and its potential target, the AP2 family gene, in P. hybrida tissues. The same primers were used to amplify PhmiR172-1 and PhmiR172-2 because of the short length of PhmiR172-1. RT-PCR indicated that the transcription levels of PhmiR172s and PhAP2 were complementary in some tissues, such as root, stem, leaf and petal, which implied that PhmiR172s might affect the transcription of AP2 (Figure 3A). Both versions of miR172 were mainly expressed in root, stem, pedicel and bud, while PhAP2 transcripts were limited to leaf, pedicel, bud and petal. MiR172 was expressed at a relatively high level in root and stem, and no AP2 mRNA was detected in these tissues. AP2 mRNA was expressed in leaf and petal, where no miR172 was detected. The detected transcript of PhAP2 was cloned and sequenced, but was only recovered as a partial mRNA (107 bp; too short to be deposited in GenBank). Phylogenetic analysis was done to confirm its identity (Figure 3B).

 

However, PhmiR172 and PhAP2 transcripts were detected in early flower structures, such as pedicels and buds (Figure 3A), which indicated a mode of dynamic regulation between PhmiR172 and its target during early flowering. The levels of PhmiR172-1 and PhmiR172-2 were not identical in the same tissues. For example, only the precursor of PhmiR172-1 was detected in roots and buds, whereas both PhmiR172s were detected at a higher level in the stem and pedicel (Figure 3A).

Overexpression of PhmiR172 in Arabidopsis promotes flowering

PhmiR172-2 showed greater sequence similarity with miR172s from other species than did PhmiR172-1. Based on this finding, we inserted the PhmiR172-2 transcript into A. thaliana plants to obtain homozygous plants overexpressing PhmiR172-2 (T₃). We identified the hygromycin tolerance gene (hpt; hygromycin phosphotransferase) that served as a marker for the vector sequences that remained in transgenic T₂ plants along with the 250-bp PhmiR172-2 sequence (Figure 4A). Hpt-positive seeds from T₂ and T₃ seeds were analysed for gene expression and phenotype. The T₃ plants expressed transcripts that were absent in control wild-type (WT) plants, although the sizes of these transcripts were not uniform (Figure 4B).

 

As expected, the T₃ plants had an early flowering phenotype (p = 0.02), flowering on average three days earlier than the controls (Figure 4C), i.e., the 23^rd day of growth (counting from seed germination, Figure 4D 2) compared to the 26^th day for WT plants(Figure 4D 7). There was no difference in leaf number between WT and transgenic plants when they blossomed (p = 0.4) (Figure 4C). The phenotypes of WT and transgenic plants are shown in Figure 4D.

Discussion

MiR172 is an miRNA that regulates flower development by targeting the TOE1 and AP2 family genes (Aukerman and Sakai, 2003). These genes belong to the A family in the ABC flowering model proposed by Bowman et al. (1991) and control early floral whorls. Overexpression of miR172 induced early flowering and changed the floral organ identity. In Arabidopsis, pAP2::AP2m3 transgenic lines, which escape repression by miR172, have a dramatic phenotype involving indeterminate floral tissues (Chen, 2004), which suggests the importance of miR172 in regulating the floral meristem via targeting of AP2. Arabidopsis miR172 defines the boundary of B family gene expression (Chen, 2004) and restricts AP2 expression to the stamen to prevent stamen-petal transformation (normally associated with AP2 overexpression) (Wollmann et al., 2010).

Phalaenopsis is an economically important flower with a long flowering period that leads to high prices. To accelerate the flowering period of Phalaenopsis by genetic engineering, we isolated two forms of miR172 from P. hybrida. We had previously failed to isolate Phalaenopsis miR172 using the rapid identification of 5' and 3' ends of cDNA. However, since this miRNA is conserved among various species and forms a stem-loop structure we deduced that miRNA* should also show some degree of conservation. For this, rice miR172s were compared and primers were designed based on the sequences of conserved regions (Figure 1), particularly the conserved nucleotides at the 3' ends of both primers. RT-PCR using genomic DNA as the template yielded two Phalaenopsis miR172 precursors. This method can be used to isolate other homologous miRNAs because the stem-loop sequences of most miRNAs are conserved between Arabidopsis and rice miRNAs* (Figure 5).

PhmiR172-2 showed higher sequence identity with miR172 from Arabidopsis and rice than did PhmiR172-1. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that PhmiR172-2 formed a cluster with rice miR172d and Arabidopsis miR172b. The shared conserved sequence among miR172s was initially identified in Phalaenopsis miR172. PhmiR172-1 diverged considerably from the main branch of plant miR172s, which suggested that it may be specific to P. hybrida. The predicted secondary mRNA structure of the Phalaenopsis miR172 precursor included a unique stem-loop that probably contributed to the relative stability of this mRNA in cells and facilitated its recognition for subsequent splicing.

The expression of Phalaenopsis miR172s and their target, PhAP2, was investigated. The primers for PhAP2 were designed based on conserved sequences such that the overall level of PhAP2 expression should represent or include that of several members of the AP2 family. As expected, semi-quantitative RT-PCR indicated that the level of PhmiR172s precursors was negatively correlated with that of the target genes in tissues such as root, stem, leaf and petal. Enhanced expression of miR172s may suppress the levels of Phalaenopsis AP2 family members, suggesting an antagonistic relationship between miR172 and the AP2 family in Phalaenopsis species. In this regard 5' RACE PCR could be useful for demonstrating target cleavage. Real-time PCR would provide better quantification of the expression, but for PhmiR172-1 and PhmiR172-2 combined.

Intriguingly, the expression levels of the two PhmiR172s were not identical. The 250-bp transcript was detected mainly in stem and pedicel, while the 100-bp transcript was detected mainly in bud and root. This divergent expression suggested different functions and regulatory mechanisms for the two miRNAs, a conclusion consistent with the sequence divergence between these two members, as indicated by the phylogenetic analysis.

The over-expression of PhmiR172 in Arabidopsis can lead to early flowering and provides evidence for the conserved function of miR172 among plants. Further exogenous expression of PhmiR172 should be done using Phalaenopsis as the host. In previous work, the overexpression of miR172 led to altered floral organ identity in Arabidopsis and rice (Zhao et al., 2007; Zhu et al., 2009); this phenomenon was not observed here.

In conclusion, the cloning and functional verification of PhmiR172 will provide a better understanding of the control of flowering time in Phalaenopsis. In addition, the newly identified Phalaenopsis miR172s can be used in genetic engineering to accelerate the flowering time of this orchid. This homologous cloning method can be applied to miRNAs from a wide variety of plant species.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 30900782), the Ministry of Agriculture of China (grant no. 2008ZX08009-001-008) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (grant no. 12ZR1402300), and the Chinese Post-Doctoral Foundation (grant no. 20080440580).

Internet Resources

Received: April 14, 2013

Accepted: August 16, 2013.

Associate Editor: Marcia Pinheiro Margis

All the content of the journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License CC BY-NC.

• Achard P, Herr A, Baulcombe DC and Harberd NP (2004) Modulation of floral development by a gibberellin-regulated microRNA. Development 131:3357-3365.
• Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM and Carrington JC (2005) microRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell 121:207-221.
• Aukerman MJ and Sakai H (2003) Regulation of flowering time and floral organ identity by a microRNA and its APETALA2-like target genes. Plant Cell 15:2730-2741.
• Bagga S, Bracht J, Hunter S, Massirer K, Holtz J, Eachus R and Pasquinelli AE (2005) Regulation by let-7 and lin-4 miRNAs results in target mRNA degradation. Cell 122:553-563.
• Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116:281-297.
• Bowman JL, Smyth DR and Meyerowitz EM (1991) The ABC model of flower development: Then and now. Development 139:4095-4098.
• Chen X (2004) A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science 303:2022-2025.
• Chiou TJ, Aung K, Lin SI, Wu CC, Chiang SF and Su CL (2006) Regulation of phosphate homeostasis by microRNA in Arabidopsis Plant Cell 18:412-421.
• Chuck G, Meeley R, Irish E, Sakai H and Hake S (2007) The maize tasselseed4 microRNA controls sex determination and meristem cell fate by targeting Tasselseed6/indeterminate spikelet1. Nat Genet 39:1517-1521.
• Dellaporta SL, Wood J and Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA mini-preparation: version II. Plant Mol Biol Rep 1:19-21.
• Glazinska P, Zienkiewicz A, Wojciechowski W and Kopcewicz J (2009) The putative miR172 target gene InAPETALA2-like is involved in the photoperiodic flower induction of Ipomoea nil J Plant Physiol 166:1801-1813.
• Gleave AP, Ampomah-Dwamena C, Berthold S, Dejnoprat S, Karunairetnam S, Nain B, Wang Y-Y, Crowhurst RN and MacDiarmid RM (2010) Identification and characterization of primary microRNAs from apple (Malus domestica cv. Royal Gala) expressed sequence tags. Tree Genet Genomics 4:343-358.
• Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van Dongen S, Bateman A and Enright AJ (2006) miRBase: MicroRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D140-144.
• Hwang EW, Shin SJ, Park SC, Jeong MJ and Kwon HB (2011) Identification of miR172 family members and their putative targets responding to drought stress in Solanum tuberosum Genes Genom 33:105-110.
• Jung JH, Seo YH, Seo PJ, Reyes JL, Yun J, Chua NH and Park CM (2007) The GIGANTEA-regulated microRNA172 mediates photoperiodic flowering independent of CONSTANS in Arabidopsis Plant Cell 19:2736-2748.
• Kasai A, Kanehira A and Harada T (2010) miR172 can move long distances in Nicotiana benthamiana Open Plant Sci J 4:1-6.
• Lee RC, Feinbaum RL and Ambros V (1993) The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75:843-854.
• Llave C, Xie Z, Kasschau KD and Carrington JC (2002) Cleavage of scarecrow-like mRNA targets directed by a class of Arabidopsis miRNA. Science 297:2053-2056.
• Martin A, Adam H, Diaz-Mendoza M, Zurczak M, Gonzalez-Schain ND and Suarez-Lopez P (2009) Graft-transmissible induction of potato tuberization by the microRNA miR172. Development 136:2873-2881.
• Parcy F, Nilsson O, Busch MA, Lee I and Weigel D (1998) A genetic framework for floral patterning. Nature 395:561-566.
• Park W, Li J, Song R, Messing J and Chen X (2002) CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer homolog, and HEN1, a novel protein, act in microRNA metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Biol 12:1484-1495.
• Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S and Lin HX (2005) A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat Genet 37:1141-1146.
• Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M and Weigel D (2005) Specific effects of microRNAs on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell 8:517-527.
• Thompson JD, Higgins DG and Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680.
• Wollmann H, Mica E, Todesco M, Long JA and Weigel D (2010) On reconciling the interactions between APETALA2, miR172 and AGAMOUS with the ABC model of flower development. Development 137:3633-3642.
• Wu G, Park MY, Conway SR, Wang JW, Weigel D and Poethig RS (2009) The sequential action of miR156 and miR172 regulates developmental timing in Arabidopsis Cell 138:750-759.
• Yekta S, Shih IH and Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNA-directed cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA. Science 304:594-596.
• Zhao L, Kim Y, Dinh TT and Chen X (2007) miR172 regulates stem cell fate and defines the inner boundary of APETALA3 and PISTILLATA expression domain in Arabidopsis floral meristems. Plant J 51:840-849.
• Zhu QH and Helliwell CA (2011) Regulation of flowering time and floral patterning by miR172. J Exp Bot 62:487-495.
• Zhu QH, Upadhyaya NM, Gubler F and Helliwell CA (2009) Over-expression of miR172 causes loss of spikelet determinacy and floral organ abnormalities in rice (Oryza sativa). BMC Plant Biol 9:e149.
• RNA structure analysis software, RNA fold, http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/rnafold/submission.html (December 16, 2012).
• Mega5.0 software, http://www.megasoftware.net/faq.php (January 7, 2012).

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  15 Apr 2014
• Date of issue
  June 2014

History

• Received
  14 Apr 2013
• Accepted
  16 Aug 2013