BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements in Brazilian individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome

Abstract

Approximately 5-10% of breast cancers are caused by germline mutations in high penetrance predisposition genes. Among these, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are associated with the Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome, are the most frequently affected genes. Recent studies confirm that gene rearrangements, especially in BRCA1, are responsible for a significant proportion of mutations in certain populations. In this study we determined the prevalence of BRCA rearrangements in 145 unrelated Brazilian individuals at risk for HBOC syndrome who had not been previously tested for BRCA mutations. Using Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and a specific PCR-based protocol to identify a Portuguese founder BRCA2 mutation, we identified two (1,4%) individuals with germline BRCA1 rearrangements (c.547+240_5193+178del and c.4675+467_5075-990del) and three probands with the c.156_157insAlu founder BRCA2 rearrangement. Furthermore, two families with false positive MLPA results were shown to carry a deleterious point mutation at the probe binding site. This study comprises the largest Brazilian series of HBOC families tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements to date and includes patients from three regions of the country. The overall observed rearrangement frequency of 3.44% indicates that rearrangements are relatively uncommon in the admixed population of Brazil.

Keywords
Breast cancer; Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer syndrome; gene rearrangements; BRCA gene

Introduction

Approximately 5-10% of all breast cancer diagnoses are associated to germline mutations in highly penetrant cancer predisposition genes. Among these, the tumor suppressor genes BRCA1 (OMIM # 113705) and BRCA2 (OMIM # 600185) are the most frequently affected and best studied. The presence of a germline mutation in these genes defines Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder that predisposes affected individuals to several early-onset tumors including breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic cancer and melanoma. Identification of at-risk individuals is important because several risk-reducing strategies can be offered to at-risk patients, especially if they are not yet affected by cancer (ASCO Subcommittee on Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility,1996; Frank et al., 2002; Garber and Offit, 2005; Mai et al., 2009; Allain,2008).

Hundreds of deleterious germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been described in all populations. These mutations are most frequently single base substitutions (predominantly nonsense mutations) or small frameshift insertions/deletions, which result in premature stop codons and truncated non-functional proteins (http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/) (Ford et al., 1998; Ewald et al., 2009; O'Donnovan and Livingston, 2010). However, in many studies the observed frequencies of deleterious BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in HBOC families are lower than predicted by linkage analysis or mutation probability models. Pathogenic variations in the coding region or in splice sites of the genes are found in, at most, two thirds of the families carrying BRCA mutations (Wera et al., 2003; Linger and Kruk, 2010). Several explanations for this observation have been proposed, including heterogeneous inclusion criteria with different stringencies, the existence of other dominant genes associated with the phenotype, and/or additive effects of multiple lower penetrance alleles. In addition, the presence of pathogenic alterations that escape most of the current gene sequencing-based diagnostic approaches were proposed, including partial or complete exon losses or duplications resulting in an out-of-frame translation and a mutant peptide with abnormal structure and/or function (Petrij-Bosch et al., 1997; Ewald et al., 2009). Several reports confirmed that BRCA rearrangements, particularly in BRCA1, are indeed quite frequent in HBOC families from selected countries (Preisler-Adams et al., 2006; Hansen et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2010; Ratajska et al., 2008; Stadler et al., 2010; Rudnicka et al., 2013; Pal et al., 2014). These mutations are scattered throughout the gene and although most of them are deletions, duplications and triplications, as well as combined deletion/insertion events have also been described. The higher prevalence of rearrangements in BRCA1, compared to BRCA2, has been attributed to its molecular structure, which is characterized by an extremely high density of intronic Alu repeats and by the presence of a duplicated promoter region containing a pseudogene that favors unequal homologous recombination events (Smith et al., 1996; Puget et al., 2002; Thomassen et al., 2006; Staaf et al., 2008).

The highest proportion of BRCA1 rearrangements in HBOC families has been observed in The Netherlands, where it represents approximately 36% of the identifiable mutations in the gene in this population (Petrij-Bosch et al., 1997). A similar frequency of deleterious BRCA1 gene rearrangements has been described in HBOC families from Northern Italy (Montagna et al., 2003), and in Portuguese HBOC families a single founder BRCA2 rearrangement (c. 156_157insAlu) has been identified in 8% of the families studied (Machado et al., 2007). In contrast, Danish families with HBOC have a BRCA1 rearrangement prevalence less than 5%, and in Finland and Canada few or no BRCA1 rearrangements have been identified in high-risk families (Lahti-Domenici et al., 2001; Moisan et al., 2006; Pylkas et al., 2008). Considering the specificity of the mutation prevalence in different populations and the importance of the precise identification of mutation carriers in at-risk families, we aimed to determine the frequency and nature of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements in Brazilian HBOC families.

Patients and Methods

Patient recruitment

A consecutive sample of 145 unrelated Brazilian patients who were diagnosed with cancer and had a significant personal and/or family history suggestive of HBOC syndrome was evaluated in cancer genetic counseling services from three Brazilian Institutions in the South (Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS; n = 69), Southeast (Brazilian National Cancer Institute, INCA, Rio de Janeiro, RJ; n = 43) and Northeast (Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Oncogenetics, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, BA; n = 33) of the country. The 69 probands from Porto Alegre had been previously studied for the Portuguese founder rearrangement c.156_157insAlu in BRCA2 (Peixoto et al., 2011).

Cancer-affected probands were approached during their routine clinical visits and invited to participate in the study. None of them had been previously tested for germline BRCA mutations, due to restricted access to testing through the public health care system. All participants signed informed consents and fulfilled one or more of the following criteria: (a) personal and family history consistent with the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) criteria for HBOC syndrome (ASCO Subcommittee on Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility) (ASCO, 1996); or (b) a prior probability for a BRCA mutation ≥ 20% using either mutation prevalence tables published by Myriad Genetics Laboratories, Inc. or the Penn II mutation prediction model (Frank et al., 2002; Myriad Genetics). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the institutional ethics committees of all participating centers.

Screening for BRCA rearrangements by MLPA

Relative copy number quantification of all 24 BRCA1 and 27 BRCA2 exons was performed using the SALSA P002B BRCA1 and SALSA P045 BRCA2 MLPA probe mix assays (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) as recommended by the manufacturer. Multiplex PCR-amplified products were separated by capillary gel electrophoresis in an ABI PRISM 3130XL Genetic Analyzer and analyzed using GeneMapper ID V3.2 software. Information on copy number was extracted with Coffalyser V9.4 Software (MRC-Holland, http://www.mrc-holland.com/). All analyses were performed in duplicate and in at least two independent experiments. Positive results were confirmed in an additional independent experiment performed on a second blood sample. Samples showing BRCA1 rearrangements identified by the SALSA MLPA P002B kit were then analyzed by a different set of MLPA probes (SALSA P087 MLPA probemix, MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Characterization of rearrangement breakpoints

To confirm BRCA rearrangements detected by MLPA, all rearrangement-positive samples were submitted to long-range PCR amplification using AmpliTaq Gold® DNA Polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) and primers specifically designed for the regions of interest. Amplification products of long-range PCR were separated by 2.0% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under UV. The mutant (variant size) amplification products were extracted and purified using a Gel Band Purification Kit (Illustra, GE Healthcare UK limited, Buckinghamshire, UK) as described by the manufacturer. Isolated PCR fragments were submitted to bidirectional sequencing using a Big Dye V3.1 Terminator Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) with standard protocols. All sequencing electropherograms were analyzed using GeneMapper® Software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA).

Detection of the c.156_157insAlu BRCA2 mutation by PCR

To identify the c.156_157insAlu mutation, BRCA2 exon 3 was PCR amplified and amplicons were visualized by electrophoresis. To confirm the presence of the insertion detected in the first PCR round, a second PCR with specific primers flanking the Alu insertion was performed. All Alu insertion-positive samples were submitted to confirmatory sequencing analysis as described by Teulges et al. (2005).

Statistical Analyses

Sample size was estimated using WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows), and SPSS version 18.0 was used for data handling and statistical analyses. For descriptive analysis, categorical variables were described by their absolute frequencies and quantitative variables were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD); a significance level of 0.05 was considered acceptable.

Results

Clinical data of the 145 unrelated probands included in this study are summarized in Table 1. The mean age at diagnosis of the first HBOC-associated tumor was 43 years, and the most frequent tumor was breast cancer, as expected. Among all included probands, 118 (81.4%) were diagnosed with their first primary tumor before the age of 50 years. The estimated prior probability of carrying a BRCA gene mutation was greater than 20% for 65 (44.8%) and 71 (49.0%) probands according to the Myriad mutation prevalence tables and the Penn II model, respectively. Overall, BRCA rearrangements were identified in 5 probands (3.4%), with three of them being positive for the Portuguese BRCA2 founder rearrangement c.156_157insAlu. All BRCA1- and one of the BRCA2-positive probands had multiple primary tumors. In two cases, positive MLPA results were not confirmed with a second set of MLPA probes, and further testing revealed a point mutation in the MLPA probe hybridization site. Sequencing of the two individuals with unequivocal BRCA1 rearrangements found by MLPA identified the exact breakpoints. The first case (proband 24) had a microdeletion comprising exons 9 to 19, which was visualized after long-range PCR amplification of the flanking regions as a variant amplification product of approximately 450 bp, when compared to the wild-type allele amplification product of 9 kb. Bidirectional sequencing of the variant allele identified the exact breakpoints and characterized this rearrangement as c.547+240_5193+178del, which was previously described (Figure 1A) (Silva et al., 2012). The second case (proband 117) had a microdeletion in exons 16 and 17, which was visualized after long-range PCR amplification of the flanking regions as a variant amplification product of approximately 590 bp when compared to the wild-type allele amplification product of 6 kb. Bidirectional sequencing of the variant allele identified the exact breakpoints and characterized this rearrangement as c.4675+467_5075-990del (Figure 1B). In the other two cases (probands 26 and 32) with a suspected deletion of exon 19, confirmatory MLPA with a second set of probes failed to confirm the presence of a rearrangement. Further sequencing of the region identified the frameshift founder mutation initially described in African Americans (NM_007294.2: c.5177_5180delGAAA) (Figure 1C), which is localized within the sequence corresponding to one of the BRCA1 exon 19 probes of the SALSA P002B BRCA1 set (Figure 1). A description of the clinical and family history features of the four BRCA1 and of the three BRCA2 germline mutation carriers is summarized in Table 2.

Table 1
Clinical characterization of the series (n = 145) of HBOC patients included in this study.

Feature	N	%	Mean (± SD) in years
Gender	144	99.9
Female
Age at breast cancer (years)			42.92 (9.5)
			range: 19-69
Breast cancer diagnosed < 50 ys	118	81.4
HBOC syndrome criteria1
ASCO	84	57.9
Mutation prevalence2 ≥ 20%	65	44.8
Prior probability3 (Penn II) ≥ 20%	71	49.0
Bilateral breast cancer	18	12.4
Type of tumor in the proband
Breast cancer	129	88.9
Ovarian cancer	6	4.2
Colorectal cancer	4	2.8
Other4	6	4.1
Multiple primaries	31	21.4
≥ 2 Breast	14
1 breast and 1 ovarian	6
≥ 2 Breast and 1 ovarian	3
At least one breast + other	7
At least one ovarian + other	1

• ¹
  One proband may fulfill more than one criterion
• ²
  Patients with a family history compatible with a mutation prevalence of ≥ 20%
• ³
  Estimated prior probability of being a germline BRCA mutation carrier
• ⁴
  Gastric cancer, melanoma, carcinoma of the uterine cervix, prostate and kidney cancer.

Figure 1
Pedigrees of the mutation carriers. Panels A, B and C: families with germline BRCA1 mutations identified by MLPA as first mutation screening strategy. Panels D, E and F: families with germline c.156_157insAlu-BRCA2 mutation identified by PCR.

Table 2
Clinical features of the seven probands with germline BRCA mutations.

Case #	BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation identified	Cancer diagnosis (index-case)	Age at diagnosis (1st primary, years)	Cancer family history*	ASCO criteria	Prior Prob. of Mutation in BRCA# (%)
24-RS	BRCA1 Deletion exons 9-19: g.29197_65577 del36381	Multiple primary: breast and endometrial	41	MAT Hepatob (M-36), Esoph (M-N/A), Br (F-30), Panc (M-N/A), Blad (M-N/A), Br (F-50), Br and Panc (F-40,80),Prost (M-60), Ut (F-40), CNS (M-8), Br (F-60).	Yes	30.1
				PAT Br (F-60), Lu (M-N/A)	No	6.9
117-BA	BRCA1 Deletion exons 16-17 c.4675+467_5075-990del	Multiple primary: breast and ovarian	49	MAT Ovarian (F-54), Thyr (F-30), Lymph (M -54) and Prost (M-72).	Yes	79.0
				PAT Liv = (M 62), Ovarian (F52), Ovarian (F 60), Panc (M-42), Bilateral Br (F-29,35), Br (F 60), Panc (M 60).
32-RS	BRCA1 5296del4	Multiple primary: breast and ovarian	35	MAT Br (F-52), Ut (F-54), Ut (F-47) Ut (F-N/I), Br (F-52)	Yes	39.1
36-RS	BRCA1 5296del4	Multiple primary: bilateral Breast	46	MAT Br (F-48), Br (F-42),Skin (F-46), Skin (F-N/A)	Yes	30.1
100-RS	BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu	Multiple primary: bilateral Breast	51	MAT Br (F-62), CCR (M-80), Ut (F-35), Ovarian (F-45), gastric (M-52),panc (M- 62), panc (F- 67), Glioblast (M-38)	Yes	10.6
36-RJ	BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu	Breast	39	MAT Br (F-36), Gastric (M-N/A)	Yes	15.8
56-RJ	BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu	Breast	48	MAT Br (F-37), Tongue (M-45), Yes	15.8

• Legend: RS = family recruited from Rio Grande do Sul; BA = family recruited from Salvador -BA.MAT = cancer history in the maternal side of the family, PAT = cancer history in the paternal side of the family;
• ^*
  Other cancer diagnoses in family are indicated by the abbreviated cancer type (Br = breast, Prost = prostate; Esoph = esophageal; Hepatob = hepatoblastoma; End= endometrial; CNS = central nervous system, Panc = pancreatic, Blad = bladder; Thyr =Thyroid; Lymph = Lymphoma; Glioblast = glioblastoma, Ut = uterine cancer, not defined whether cervix or endometrium) followed by sex (M = male, F = female) and age at diagnosis (N/A= not available).
• ^#
  according to Myriad mutation prevalence tables.

Discussion

Using a combined strategy of MLPA and targeted c.156_157insAlu BRCA2 rearrangement testing as a first approach to screen for BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations in a series of Brazilian HBOC patients, we identified seven (4.82%) mutation carriers (with point mutations explaining the abnormal initial MLPA finding in two of them). BRCA1 rearrangements are usually more prevalent than those in BRCA2 mostly due to the high density of Alu elements throughout the BRCA1 locus, which seem to be particularly frequent in certain populations. In addition to possible founder effects in specific populations, rearrangements have been most commonly encountered in probands and families with multiple primary cancer diagnoses in at least one individual (Gad et al., 2002; Montagna et al., 2003; Pavlicek et al., 2004; Mazoyer, 2005; Woodward et al., 2005; Walsh et al., 2006). This phenotype was also observed in the majority of rearrangement-positive patients from the current series, reinforcing that rearrangements should always be looked for in families where at least one cancer-affected individual has more than one primary tumor.

The BRCA1 deletion 9-19, identified in a proband that developed breast cancer at the age of 41 and endometrial cancer at the age of 44 years has been described in an Italian patient (Montagna et al., 2003; Silva et al., 2012). We were able to trace the family history back to the probands maternal grandfather, who emigrated to Brazil from Italy in the 19^th century. On the other hand, deletions involving exons 16 or 17 are quite common and have been described in several populations. However, a rearrangement involving breakpoints at Alu regions in intron 15 and intron 17 has not been described to our knowledge (Santarosa et al., 1999; Hartmann et al., 2004; Rodríguez et al., 2010).

An interesting result from this mutation screening strategy was the identification by MLPA of a small frameshift mutation (a deletion of four nucleotides in BRCA1 exon 19, c.5177_5180delGAAA) in two families. Since the mutation occurs within the region complementary to the exon 19 probe, hybridization did not occur and a call for an exon 19 deletion was made. The use of a second MLPA kit with a different probe for that specific region failed to identify the rearrangement, and sequencing through the region confirmed the frameshift mutation. This illustrates the importance of always confirming MLPA results with an alternative mutation detection method in the diagnostic setting. Interestingly, this particular frameshift mutation has been previously described as a founder mutation in African Americans and has been associated with more aggressive tumors, diagnosed at younger ages. Both of the mutation-positive families identified in our study reported European ancestry (German), and although the probands have been diagnosed with multiple primary tumors, there is no evidence in either of them for a more aggressive clinical course (Qing et al., 1997, 2000; Olopade et al., 2003; Ferla et al., 2007).

Considering the existence of a founder BRCA2 rearrangement (c.156_157insAlu), which is very common in Portugal, we added a second screening protocol specific for this particular mutation in this investigation. This strategy enabled the identification of the founder in three families, which is not unexpected given the high proportion of Portuguese descendants among the Brazilian population (Marrero et al., 2005). This rearrangement had not been previously reported in southern and northeastern Brazil, but has been seen in HBOC families from the southeastern region of the country (Peixoto et al., 2011, Félix et al., 2014). Our results reinforce the importance of characterizing mutations in specific populations.

Most of the studies describing the prevalence of BRCA1 rearrangements in HBOC individuals have screened for such mutations only after a negative result in a full gene sequencing approach. Considering the cost and complexity of sequencing the entire coding region of both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, we designed this study to verify whether MLPA and a specific protocol for a founder BRCA2 mutation could be an effective strategy as an initial mutation screening approach. Although we did identify germline BRCA1 mutations and the Portuguese founder mutation in this series, the mutation frequency was relatively low, and in the majority of the patients included the molecular diagnosis remains undetermined. Thus, we conclude that MLPA can be used as an initial approach for screening BRCA1 mutations in HBOC families, especially considering that it is an inexpensive and straightforward methodology which enables mutation screening of the coding region within a few hours. In populations where a known founder mutation occurs, screening for this specific founder as an initial step can be even more effective. However, we emphasize that this investigation is only partial and that continued investigation by full gene sequencing must be proposed in all high-risk families if such an initial approach is chosen and renders negative results.

In conclusion, this study comprises the largest Brazilian series of HBOC families tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements to date, and includes patients from three regions of the country. Although this series cannot be considered representative of the entire Brazilian population, the overall observed rearrangement frequency of less than 5% suggests that BRCA rearrangements are relatively uncommon in this heterogeneous population.

References

• Allain DC (2008) Genetic counseling and testing for common hereditary breast cancer syndromes: A paper from the 2007 William Beaumont hospital symposium on molecular pathology. J Mol Diagn 10:383-395.
• ASCO Subcommittee on Genetic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility (1996) Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 14:1730-1736.
• Ewald IP, Ribeiro PL, Palmero EI, Cossio SL, Giugliani R and Ashton-Prolla P (2009) Genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2: A literature review. Genet Mol Biol 32:437-446.
• Félix GES, Abe-Sandes C, Machado-Lopes TMB, Bonfim TF, Guindalini RSC, Santos VCSAR, Meyer L, Oliveira PC, Neiva JC, Meyer R, et al. (2014) Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2,, CHEK2, and TP53 in patients at hgh risk for HBOC: Characterizing a Northeast Brazilian Population. Hum Genome Var 1:e14012.
• Ferla R, Calò V, Cascio S, Rinaldi G, Badalamenti G, Carreca I, Surmacz E, Colucci G, Bazan V and Russo A (2007) Founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Ann Oncol 18(Suppl 6):vi93-vi98.
• Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J, et al. (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676-689.
• Frank TS, Deffenbaugh AM, Reid JE, Hulick M, Ward BE, Lingenfelter B, Gumpper KL, Scholl T, Tavtigian SV, Pruss DR, et al. (2002) Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: Analysis of 10,000 individuals. J Clin Oncol 20:1480-1490.
• Gad S, Klinger M, Caux-Moncoutier V, Pages-Berhouet S, Gauthier-Villars M, Coupier I, Bensimon A, Aurias A and Stoppa-Lyonnet D (2002) Bar code screening on combed DNA for large rearrangements of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in French breast cancer families. J Med Genet 39:817-821.
• Garber JE and Offit K (2005) Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. J Clin Oncol 23:276-292.
• Hansen Tv, Jønson L, Albrechtsen A, Andersen MK, Ejlertsen B and Nielsen FC (2008) Large BRCA1 and BRCA2 genomic rearrangements in Danish high risk breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:315-323.
• Hartmann C, John AL, Klaes R, Hofmann W, Bielen R, Koehler R, Janssen B, Bartram CR, Arnold N and Zschocke J (2004) Large BRCA1 gene deletions are found in 3% of German high-risk breast cancer families. Hum Mutat 24:534.
• Kang P, Mariapun S, Phuah SY, Lim LS, Liu J, Yoon SY, Thong MK, MohdTaib NA, Yip CH and Teo SH (2010) Large BRCA1 and BRCA2 genomic rearrangements in Malaysian high risk breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:579-584.
• Lahti-Domenici J, Rapakko K, Pääkkönen K, Allinen M, Nevanlinna H, Kujala M, Huusko P and Winqvist R (2001) Exclusion of large deletions and other rearrangements in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Finnish breast and ovarian cancer families. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 129:120-123.
• Linger RJ and Kruk PA (2010) BRCA1 16 years later: Risk-associated BRCA1 mutations and their functional implications. FEBS J 277:3086-3096.
• Machado PM, Brandão RD, Cavaco BM, Eugénio J, Bento S, Nave M, Rodrigues P, Fernandes A and Vaz F (2007) Screening for a BRCA2 rearrangement in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families: Evidence for a founder effect and analysis of the associated phenotypes. J Clin Oncol 25:2027-2034.
• Mai PL, Chatterjee N, Hartge P, Tucker M, Brody L, Struewing JP and Wacholder S (2009) Potential excess mortality in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers beyond breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers, and melanoma. PLoS One 4:e4812.
• Marrero AR, Das Neves Leite FP, De Almeida Carvalho B, Peres LM, Kommers TC, Da Cruz IM, Salzano FM, Ruiz-Linares A, Da Silva Júnior WA and Bortolini MC (2005) Heterogeneity of the genome ancestry of individuals classified as White in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Am J Hum Biol. 17:496-506.
• Mazoyer S (2005) Genomic rearrangements in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum Mutat 25:415-422.
• Moisan AM, Fortin J, Dumont M, Samson C, Bassette P, Chiquette J, Laframboise R, Lépine J, Lespétance B, Pichette R, et al. (2006) No evidence of BRCA1/2 genomic rearrangements in high-risk French-Canadian breast/ovarian cancer families. Genet Test 10:104-115.
• Montagna M, Dalla Palma M, Menin C, Agata S, De Nicolo A, Chieco-Bianchi L and D'Andrea E (2003) Genomic rearrangements account for more than one-third of the BRCA1 mutations in northern Italian breast/ovarian cancer families. Hum Mol Genet 12:1055-1061.
• O'Donovan PJ and Livingston DM (2010) BRCA1 and BRCA2: Breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene products and participants in DNA double-strand break repair. Carcinogenesis 31:961-967.
• Olopade OI, Fackenthal JD, Dunston G, Tainsky MA, Collins F and Whitfield-Broome C (2003) Breast cancer genetics in African Americans. Cancer 97(Suppl):236-245.
• Pal T, Bonner D, Cragun D, Johnson S, Akbari M, Servais L, Narod S and Vadaparampil S (2014) BRCA sequencing and large rearrangement testing in young Black women with breast cancer. J Community Genet 5:157-165.
• Pavlicek A, Noskov VN, Kouprina N, Barrett JC, Jurka J and Larionov V (2004) Evolution of the tumor suppressor BRCA1 locus in primates: Implications for cancer predisposition. Hum Mol Genet 13:2737-2751.
• Peixoto A, Santos C, Pinheiro M, Pinto P, Soares MJ, Rocha P, Gusmão L, Amorim A, van der Hout A, Gerdes AM, et al. (2011) International distribution and age estimation of the Portuguese BRCA2 c.156_157insAlu founder mutation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127:671-679.
• Petrij-Bosch A, Peelen T, van Vliet M, van Eijk R, Olmer R, Drüsedau M, Hogervorst FB, Hageman S, Arts PJ, Ligtenberg MJ, et al. (1997) BRCA1 genomic deletions are major founder mutations in Dutch breast cancer patients. Nat Genet 17:341-345.
• Preisler-Adams S, Schönbuchner I, Fiebig B, Welling B, Dworniczak B and Weber BH (2006) Gross rearrangements in BRCA1 but not BRCA2 play a notable role in predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer in high-risk families of German origin. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 168:44-49.
• Puget N, Gad S, Perrin-Vidoz L, Sinilnikova OM, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Lenoir GM, Mazoyer S, Puget N, Gad S and Perrin-Vidoz L (2002) Distinct BRCA1 rearrangements involving the BRCA1 pseudogene suggest the existence of a recombination hot spot. Am J Hum Genet 70:858-865.
• Pylkäs K, Erkko H, Nikkilä J, Sólyom S and Winqvist R (2008) Analysis of large deletions in BRCA1, BRCA2 and PALB2 genes in Finnish breast and ovarian cancer families. BMC Cancer 8:e4146.
• Gao Q, Neuhausen S, Cummings S, Luce M and Olufunmilayo IO (1997) Recurrent germ-line BRCA1 mutations in extended African American families with early-onset breast cancer. Hum Genet 60:1233-1236.
• Gao Q, Tomlinson G, Das S, Cummings S, Sveen L, Fackenthal J, Schumm P and Olopade OI (2000) Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among clinic-based African American families with breast cancer. Hum Genet 107:186-191.
• Ratajska M, Brozek I, Senkus-Konefka E, Jassem J, Stepnowska M, Palomba G, Pisano M, Casula M, Palmieri G, Borg A, et al. (2008) BRCA1 and BRCA2 point mutations and large rearrangements in breast and ovarian cancer families in northern Poland. Oncology 19:263-268.
• Rodríguez M, Torres A, Borràs J, Salvat M and Gumà J (2010) Large genomic rearrangements in mutation-negative BRCA families: A population-based study. Clin Genet 78:405-407.
• Rudnicka H, Debniak T, Cybulski C, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Lubinski J and Gorski B (2013) Large BRCA1 and BRCA2 genomic rearrangements in Polish high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families. Mol Biol Rep 40:6619-6623.
• Santarosa M, Dolcetti R, Magri MD, Crivellari D, Tibiletti MG, Gallo A, Tumolo S, Della Puppa L, Furlan D, Boiocchi M, et al. (1999) BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes: Role in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Italy. Int J Cancer 83:5-9.
• Silva AG, Ewald IP, Sapienza M, Pinheiro M, Peixoto A, de Nóbrega AF, Carraro DM, Teixeira MR, Ashton-Prolla P, Achatz MI, et al. (2012) Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome associated with a large BRCA1 intragenic deletion. BMC Cancer 12:e237.
• Smith TM, Lee MK, Szabo CI, Jerome N, McEuen M, Taylor M, Hood L and King MC (1996) Complete genomic sequence and analysis of 117 kb of human DNA containing the gene BRCA1. Genome Res 6:1029-1049.
• Staaf J, Törngren T, Rambech E, Johansson U, Persson C, Sellberg G, Tellhed L, Nilbert M and Borg A (2008) Detection and precise mapping of germline rearrangements in BRCA1, BRCA2, MSH2, and MLH1 using zoom-in array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Hum Mutat 29:555-564.
• Stadler ZK, Saloustros E, Hansen NA, Schluger AE, Kauff ND, Offit K and Robson ME (2010) Absence of genomic BRCA1 and BRCA2 rearrangements in Ashkenazi breast and ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res Treat 123:581-585.
• Thomassen M, Gerdes AM, Cruger D, Jensen PK and Kruse TA (2006) Low frequency of large genomic rearrangements of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in western Denmark. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 168:168-171.
• Walsh T, Casadei S, Coats KH, Swisher E, Stray SM, Higgins J, Roach KC, Mandell J, Kee MK, Ciernikova S, et al. (2006) Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA 295:1379-1388
• Hofmann W, Gorgens H, John A, Horn D, Huttner C, Arnold N, Scherneck S and Schackert HK (2003) Screening for large rearrangements of the BRCA1 gene in german breast or ovarian cancer families using semi-quantitative multiplex PCR Method. Hum Mutat 22:103-4.
• Woodward AM, Davis TA, Silva AGS, kConFab Investigators, KirkJA and Leary JA (2005) Large genomic rearrangements of both BRCA2 and BRCA1 are a feature of the inherited breast/ovarian cancer phenotype in selected families. J Med Genet 42:e31.

Internet Resources

• Couch Modified Mutation Prediction Model, http://www.afcri.upenn.edu/itacc/penn2/, accessed Jan 2015.
  » http://www.afcri.upenn.edu/itacc/penn2/
• Myriad Genetics, Laboratories and Pharmaceuticals, Inc., http://www.myriad.com, accessed Jan 2015.
  » http://www.myriad.com
• National Human Genome Research Institute, http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/, accessed Jan 2015.
  » http://research.nhgri.nih.gov/bic/

• Associate Editor: Héctor Seuanez

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Apr-Jun 2016

History

• Received
  07 Dec 2014
• Accepted
  16 Mar 2015