Print version ISSN 1415-790X
Rev. bras. epidemiol. vol.14 no.4 São Paulo Dec. 2011
Mariana Tavares GuimarãesI, II; Michele Granato CunhaII; Daniele Pena CarvalhoI; Tatyana SampaioI, II; Alfésio L.F. BragaI, II; Luiz Alberto Amador PereiraI, II
of Pathology - NEEA, University of São Paulo Faculty of Medical Sciences
IICatholic University of Santos - UNISANTOS
Estimate and compare prevalence of events related to pregnancy (pregnancy, low
birth weight, premature delivery, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, congenital
malformation, and multiple births) in populations exposed and non-exposed to
environmental contaminants in Santos and São Vicente Estuary.
METHODS: This study was part of a large project financed by CNPq, which aimed to estimate health effects associated with environmental area, contaminants exposure among individuals of the Baixada Santista region. This cross-sectional study evaluated two neighborhoods of São Vicente near a contaminated area, and one neighborhood of Bertioga, the control area. A structured and previously tested questionnaire was applied at 236 households in São Vicente and 251 households in Bertioga in order to obtain the data. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate associations between area and qualitative variables; Student's t test or two proportion comparison test were used to evaluate differences between variables; and a significance level of 5% adopted.
RESULTS: There was significant association between living in Bertioga (p = 0.01) and number of pregnancies in the past five years. In São Vicente, 64 (28.3%) childbearing age women became pregnant whereas in Bertioga there where 109 (38.8%). There were no statistical significant associations between living in any area and others pregnancy outcomes evaluated.
CONCLUSION: Although no significant association was found, prevalence of low birth weight, preterm delivery and spontaneous abortion and prevalent odds ratio were higher in contaminated area. This study's evidence of a reduced number of pregnancies in contaminated area strengthens the need for additional more in-depth studies in Santos and São Vicente Estuary.
Keywords: Pregnancy outcomes. Environmental pollution. Organochlorine compounds. Heavy metals. Low birth weight. Prematurity.
The industrial development provided a quality of life never reached by the human being which, associated to a distinguishing occupation of the urban space, paradoxically increased the risk of exposition to chemical substances potentially deleterious to the human health1
According to the Environmental State Agency - CETESB2 in Brazil, Santos and São Vicente estuaries are examples of environmental degradation caused by the strong pressure on these fragile ecosystems, consequence of the intense occupation that coastal regions tend to present in a general way.
During the 50's, in the metropolitan area of Baixada Santista, the local availability of a developed road infrastructure, rail and ports, water and electricity, combined with the proximity of the metropolitan area of São Paulo led to the implantation of several basic industries (steel, petrochemicals, fertilizers) throughout the extensive network of estuarine canals and extensive mangroves, confined between the Atlantic Ocean and the Serra do Mar. This potentially highly pollutant industrial activity, often not accompanied by control measures, made the estuaries of Santos and São Vicente major recipients of toxic wastes and contaminated effluents, mainly with dust, heavy metals, organochlorines, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), dioxins and furans. Industrial pollutants, along with waste and wastewater from the Port of Santos and other cities in the region, cause a severe environmental contamination with significant impacts in the social area and public health2.
The effects of chronic exposition to industrial contaminants spread in the environment, that appear after a changeable interval of time, constitute in risks for the development of diseases with important effects in population, opposing to acute and occupational expositions, which have a major impact in the individual level 3.
There is a growing concern in the scientific community about the effects from exposure to chemicals on the reproductive system of pregnant women. Several studies provide evidence that fetuses and babies are likely to be more sensitive than adults to the varieties of toxic substances in the environmental4.
In worldwide literature and especially in Brazil there are few studies evaluating the risks to health arising from the embryo-fetal environmental contamination1. Identification of potentials risk factors for the pregnant and fetus is imperative for reducing morbidity and mortality, fetal and neonatal.
A recent review made by Shirangi and colleagues (2011), produced evidence that suggested an association between exposure to pesticides near homes and an increase in adverse outcomes of the reproductive system. Among the outcomes, the congenital malformations had presented a strong force of association. Other outcomes like low birth weight (LBW), prematurity and abortion, while presenting weaker associations, deserve new inquiries5.
As a contribution to a preliminary approach to the theme, this study aimed to estimate and compare the prevalence of events related to pregnancy (low birth weight, premature birth, miscarriage, stillbirth, congenital malformations, and multiple births) in neighborhoods of two cities (São Vicente and Bertioga) in the region of the estuary of Santos and São Vicente.
This is a cross sectional study which was part of a larger project entitled "Epidemiological study on resident population in metropolitan area of Santos - Santos Estuary: Evaluation of effect and exposure indicators to environmental contaminants" whose objective was to estimate the effects on health associated with exposure to environmental contaminants among the residents of metropolitan area of Santos - Santos and São Vicente Estuary, this project was funded by the National Research Council - CNPq.
Identification of contaminated areas used in this study was done based on the report "Santos and São Vicente Estuarine System"2 of CETESB, which aimed to evaluate the contamination of water, sediments and aquatic organisms of the estuarine system of Santos and São Vicente and Santos Bay, relating it to potential contaminants sources in the region.
After the areas were identified, exposed and non-exposed population samples were calculated based on the prevalence of congenital malformations in Brazil and the 2000 Brazilian resident population census classified by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics - IBGE.
In this preliminary study three neighborhoods were selected in two distinct areas (Figure 1). Two of them, Parque das Bandeiras e Parque das Bandeiras Gleba II, located in São Vicente (Área 1) in the continental portion, in a radius up to 1.5 km away from industrial contaminants identified by CETESB (2001)2. These deposits, dating from the mid-1960, contain heavy metals (particularly mercury and zinc) and organochlorine (hexachlorobenzene)2, with the soil, water and air as possible complete routes of exposure according to ATSDR criteria6. As a region of contrast in relation to environmental contamination, but with socio-economic characteristics of the region near Santos, = Jardim Vicente de Carvalho Ii was chosen, located in Bertioga (Area 2), along the Rio-Santos highway. 193 families were selected in Parque das Bandeiras, 43 no Parque das Bandeiras Gleba II and 251 in Jardim Vicente de Carvalho II, a total of 487 domiciles.
In each residence a structured questionnaire was applied with reference to the morbidity questionnaire developed by researchers at the National Cancer Institute (INCA) in 2003. This questionnaire was adapted to the needs of the study and pre-tested in order to ensure consistency and applicability. The interviews were conducted during the weekends (between March and December 2007) and, in cases where besides the informant, the other residents were at home, they collaborated with their personal information. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Research. After data collecting, a descriptive analysis was made of childbearing age women, between 15 and 49 years according to the classification of the IBGE. To assess pregnancy outcomes (low birth weight - live birth weighing less than 2500g; prematurity - live births with gestational age less than 37 weeks, spontaneous abortion - pregnancy loss under 20 weeks, stillbirth - 20 weeks of pregnancy loss or more, congenital malformations and multiple births) data of women who became pregnant in the last five years was used.
To test association between qualitative variables, chi-square test or exact Fisher's test was used. We also adopted the test to compare two proportions7. To test differences between quantitative variables we used Student's t test8. Prevalence rates were also calculated for each outcome of pregnancy by area and odds ratios prevalent (ORP) between areas.
Questionnaires containing errors, in blank, or when the respondent could not answer were excluded from the analysis.
SPSS (version 13.0) and significance level of 0.05 were used.
Among the 450 women living in two neighborhoods of São Vicente and the 508 women in the neighborhood of Bertioga, 226 and 281, respectively, were within the fertile-age women group.
The average age of fertile-age women was 31.70 years in São Vicente area, where 75% were 40 years or less. In Bertioga area the average age of fertile-age women was 29.39 years, where 75% of these women were 36 years or less. Statistically significant difference was showed between mean ages of the sample between the two areas based on t test (p=0.02).
Table 1 shows demographic characteristics of fertile-age women in the analyzed areas. In both areas more than 50% of these women were married or living with a partner. No significant association between place of residence and women marital status was found (p=0.37).
Considering education, there was an association with place of residence by the chi-square test (p=0.00). In Bertioga area 53.1% of interviewed had completed basic education, while in São Vicente area 36.9%. With more studies years (between high school and college) there was a greater percentage in São Vicente area (61%) over Bertioga area (40.4%) (Table 1).
There was no statistical association between area and working status of fertile age women who were working at the time of the study (45.8% in São Vicente and 49.7% in Bertioga) by Fischer's exact test (p=0.46). Women who were currently working had little contact with chemicals at the workplace, only 10.8% in São Vicente area and 7.7% Bertioga area (Table 1). No significant association between living areas and contact with chemicals at the workplace was found. (Fisher's exact test with p=0.66).
In São Vicente, 45.1% of fertile-age women reported previous employment and in Bertioga this percentage was 53.7% (test for comparing two proportions with p=0.44). Out of those women, only 7.1% in São Vicente area and 5.4% in Bertioga area that reported previous employment had contact with chemicals at work (Table 1). No significant association between living areas and previous chemical contact at the workplace was found (Fisher's exact test with p=0.08).
The proportion of fertile-age women that reported smoking in Bertioga (19.7%) was higher than those in São Vicente (10.4%) (test for comparing two proportions with p=0.01). In relation to previous smoking habits, there was no statistical difference (test for comparing two proportions with p=0.39) between São Vicente (10.5%) and Bertioga (13%).
Few women reported drinking alcohol in both areas and there was no statistical difference between those from São Vicente (13.7%) and from Bertioga (20.1%). There was statistically significant difference between the percentage of fertile-age women from São Vicente (2,5%) and from Bertioga (6.9%) that reported previous alcohol consumption by the comparing two proportions test (p=0.03) (Table 1).
In São Vicente area almost 30% of the fertile-age women conceived in the last 5 years while in Bertioga this percentage was 1/3 higher (Table 2). There was an statistically significant difference between these two groups (test for comparing two proportions p=0.01).
In addition to a greater number of pregnant women in the last five years, Bertioga area also presented a greater number of pregnancies when compared to São Vicente area. The 64 women that conceived in São Vicente area had 82 pregnancies in the last five years, while the 109 fertile-age women in Bertioga area had 155 pregnancies in the period. The pregnancy average per woman over the past five years in São Vicente area was 1.28 (SD=0.57) and in Bertioga area 1.42 (SD=0.72) without statistically significant difference (t test p=0.06) (Table 2).
There was no statistically significant association between living area and receiving prenatal care (Fisher's exact test p=0.65) (Table 3).
Table 3 also shows adverse pregnancy outcomes among women that conceived in the last five years in the studied areas. São Vicente area had a higher percentage of miscarriages than Bertioga area, but without statistically significant difference (test for comparing two proportions p=0.24).
São Vicente area had a higher percentage of premature babies (8.1%) than Bertioga area (5.7%). ORP showed 1.42 times more occurrence of premature births in São Vicente area than Bertioga area, but the difference was not statistically significant (test for comparing two proportions p=0.78). In São Vicente area 4 women (6.9%) had low birth weight newborns while in Bertioga area there were 5 women (4.7%) (Table 3). ORP showed 1.47 times more likely to occur low birth weight in São Vicente area than Bertioga area but the difference was not statistically significant (test for comparing two proportions p=0.82).
Regarding frequency of stillbirths, there was only one case in the past five years among interviewed households and it occurred in São Vicente area. There was also only one case of twin birth in the last five years in Bertioga area. There were few cases where babies had congenital malformations, a case in São Vicente area (1.6%) and three cases in Bertioga area (2.8%).
Bertioga area presented a higher percentage of fertile-age women who were pregnant in the last five years in relation to São Vicente area, with a significant statistical difference. In relation to pregnancy average per woman that conceived in the last five years, no statistically significant difference was found. Brazil has a tendency to fertility decline in recent demographic census. In the country, fertility transition is close to population replacement level. However, there are internal differences in fertility rates, once they are negatively correlated with socioeconomic factors such as income and education status9. These factors had a worse level in Bertioga area than in São Vicente area in this study.
Male and female reproductive systems are susceptible to environmental factors, impacting tissue development and also adults' reproductive functions resulting in men and women fertility decrease10, 11. Evidence between exposure to environmental pollutants and human fertility is controversial and the results have little consistency12. However, experimental studies have shown that association13. Guillette & Edwards (2008) reported that environmental contaminants, including pesticides, pharmaceuticals and industrial pollutants play roles as endocrine disruptors, altering reproductive performance of wild populations of fish, amphibians, reptiles and birds13.
Association between environmental contaminants and pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriages, premature birth and low birth weight has been investigated by several authors. A review done by Windham & Fenster14 was associated with increased risk for air pollution, heavy metals, pesticides and others. For organochlorine pesticides, the authors reported a dose-response relationship between increasing levels of dichloroethylene (DDE) and prematurity.
Knowledge about organochlorines effects on human health is limited and results are usually conflicting10. Authors reported an extensive review of epidemiological studies where populations exposed to higher concentrations of PCBs or DDE exhibited reproductive abnormalities, including spontaneous abortions and reduced birth weight. They also reported that other studies, with exposure to medium and low concentrations of PCBs or DDE, found no associations with these same adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Another review analyzed studies between exposure to Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane (DDT) and/or DDE and adverse pregnancy outcomes and also found conflicting results14. The authors reported that some studies have shown associations between organochlorine pesticides with increased preterm delivery and reduced birth weight and also studies that showed no association with the same adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Abortions, premature births and low birth weight showed greater prevalence and ORP in São Vicente area than in Bertioga area, although no significant differences were found.
These results can be considered relevant since in the contaminated area there were no associations with other factors that may interfere with pregnancy, such as prenatal care, occupational exposure, alcohol consumption and smoking.
The main goal of prenatal care is to look after the well-being of the women and the fetus since the beginning of the pregnancy, ensuring the birth of a healthy child, maternal well-being and neonatal care, in ways that integrate all levels of health attention15. Poor prenatal care is an important risk factor for perinatal mortality16, premature birth and low birth weight17. Laurenti & Buchalla18 have shown that mothers who received seven or more prenatal visits had a lower perinatal mortality. SEADE Foundation data showed a large percentage difference between the cities, São Vicente (70.86%) and Bertioga (34.05%) when comparing the number of mothers who had seven or more prenatal consultations. Almost all women that conceived in the last five years in both areas had prenatal care, but the questionnaire used in this study did not evaluate the number of queries, where the treatments were performed or quality of care.
In contrast to non-occupational environmental contamination in pregnant women, occupational exposure is an important factor that should be controlled1. Occupational exposure to chemicals has been reported as an important risk factor in pregnancy, interfering in perinatal morbidity and mortality12. In the present study few women were exposed to chemicals at work in both investigated areas thus were not a relevant factor in association between outcomes and analyzed areas.
Bertioga area presented a higher percentage of fertile-age women with current and past exposure to alcohol with a significant difference to São Vicente area, although it was not possible to investigate whether consumption occurred during pregnancy. Alcohol is a substance with a significant teratogenic effect, which interferes in fetal development. Freire and co-authors19 found that alcohol use during pregnancy was associated with fetal growth restriction and females appear more susceptible to its effects. The authors reported that 10% of children born with restricted intrauterine growth in the U.S. had fetal alcohol exposure, and also that 11% of patients with mental disabilities suffered alcohol teratogenic effects.
Pregnant woman who smoke cause harm to their own health and to the health of the fetus. Effects of smoking during pregnancy include: low birth weight, premature births and miscarriage20. Passive exposure to tobacco smoke should also be considered, since studies have showed a small but consistent effect in birth weight reduction and the occurrence of preterm delivery14. Bertioga area presented a higher percentage of fertile age women with current and past smoking habits, although it was not possible to establish whether consumption occurred during pregnancy.
Studies have shown association between environmental contaminants exposure and miscarriage21, natimortality22, congenital malformations23 and multiple births24, however in this work it was not possible to assess these outcomes because of lack of data during the studied period.
In all related pregnancy outcomes, information loss never surpassed 20%. Information loss, by variable, was considered of little significance: prenatal care analysis (0.58%), pregnancy number per woman (5.20%), twin (2.31%), miscarriage (6.36%), low birth weight and stillbirth (5.20%), premature births (3.47%), and congenital malformations (2.89%).
Retrospective studies are more susceptible to memory bias25, although in the present study, pregnancy outcomes had been investigated in a short period, less than five years. In addition, more than 63% of households women interviewed answered about themselves, which reduced recall bias.
The neighborhoods studied in São Vicente are located close to deposits of industrial waste, mainly contaminated with hexachlorobenzene - HCB, hexachlorobutadiene - HCBD, tetrachlorobenzene, pentachlorobenzene, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride and perchlorethylene2.
However, contaminant presence in the environment is not sufficient to characterize contamination or exposure of a given population. The contact is crucial in order to define the presence of a contamination route. Moreover, concentration in environmental compartments and duration of contact with these substances are essential to determine the risk of adverse manifestations in exposed individuals.
Prevalence and ORP of low birth weight, premature births and miscarriages were higher in contaminated areas although no significant associations were found. Although study design did not allow causal inferences, there are sufficient evidence of pregnancy decline in contaminated areas, reinforcing the necessity for further studies in the region of Santos and São Vicente Estuary.
1. Leite JCL, Schüller-Faccini L. Defeitos congênitos em uma região de mineração de carvão. Rev Saúde Pública. 2001; 35(2): 136-41. [ Links ]
2. CETESB. Sistema Estuarino de Santos e São Vicente. Relatório Técnico. São Paulo; 2001. 141p. [ Links ]
3. Castilla EE, Campaña H, Camelo JS. Economic activity and congenital anomalies: an ecologic study in Argentina. ECLAMC ECOTERAT Group. Environ Health Perspect 2000; 108(3): 193-7. [ Links ]
4. Thakur JS, Prinja S, Singh D, Rajwanshi A, Prasad R, Parwana HK, et al. Adverse reproductive and child health outcomes among people living near highly toxic waste water drains in Pujab, India. J Epidemiol Community Health 2010; 64: 148-54. [ Links ]
5. Shirangi A, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Vienneau D, Holman CDJ. Living near agricultural pesticide applications and the risk of adverse reproductive outcomes: a review of the literature. Paedriatic and Perinatal Epidemiology 2011; 25: 172-91. [ Links ]
6. ATSDL - Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual [Internet]. Atlanta: Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual; 2005. Disponível em http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/PHAManual/toc.html. [Acessado em 20 de julho de 2011] [ Links ]
7. Spiegel S. Estatística não paramétrica. São Paulo: Editora McGraw-Hill do Brasil; 1981. [ Links ]
8. Calleri-Jacques SM. Bioestatística: Princípios e Aplicações. Porto Alegre: Ed. ARTMED; 2003. [ Links ]
9. Berquó E, Cavenaghi S. Fertility in decline: a brief note on the decrease in the number of births in Brazil. Novos Estud - CEBRAP 2006; 74: 11-5. [ Links ]
10. Toft G, Hagmar L, Giwercman A, Bonde JP. Epidemiological evidence on reproductive effects of persistent organochlorines in humans. Reproductive Toxicology 2004; 19: 5-26. [ Links ]
11. Woodruff TK, Walker CL. Fetal and early postnatal environmental exposures and reproductive health effects in the female. Fertility and Sterility 2008; 89(S1): 47-51. [ Links ]
12. Younglai EV, Holloway AC, Foster WG. Environmental and occupational factors affecting fertility and IVF success. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11(1): e43-57. [ Links ]
13. Guillette Jr LJ, Edwards TM. Environmental influences on fertility: can we learn lessons from studies of wildlife? Fertility and Sterility 2008; 89(S1): e21-4. [ Links ]
14. Windham G, Fenster L. Environmental contaminants and pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and Sterility 2008; 89(S1): e111-6. [ Links ]
15. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Área Técnica de Saúde da Mulher. Pré-natal e Puerpério: atenção qualificada e humanizada - manual técnico. Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos. Brasília; 2005. 163p. [ Links ]
16. De Lorenzi DRS, Tanaka ACA, Bozzetti MC, Ribas FE, Weissheimer L. A natimortalidade como indicador de saúde perinatal. Cad Saúde Pública 2001; 17(1): 141-6. [ Links ]
17. Belford P. Medicina Preventiva: Assistência Pré-natal. In: Rezende J (Org.). Obstetrícia. 10. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara-Koogan; 2005. p. 268-86. [ Links ]
18. Laurenti R, Buchalla CM. Estudo da morbidade e da mortalidade perinatal em maternidades: II Mortalidade perinatal segundo peso ao nascer, idade materna, assistência pré-natal e hábito de fumar da mãe. Rev Saúde Pública 1985; 19: 225-32. [ Links ]
19. Freire TM, Machado JC, Melo EV, Melo DG. Efeitos do consumo de bebida alcoólica sobre o feto. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2005; 27(7): 376-81. [ Links ]
20. Leopércio W, Gigliotti A. Tabagismo e suas peculiaridades durante a gestação: uma revisão crítica. J Bras Pneumol 2004; 30(2): 176-185. [ Links ]
21. Smrcka V, Leznarova D. Environmental pollution and the occurrence of congenital defects in a 15-year period in a south Moravian district. Acta Chir Plast 1998; 40(4): 112-4. [ Links ]
22. Pereira LAA, Loomis D, Conceição GMS, Braga ALF, Arcas RM, Kishi HS, et al. Association between air pollution and intrauterine mortality in São Paulo, Brazil. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106(6): 325-9. [ Links ]
23. Gilboa SM, Mendola P, Olshan AF, Langlois PH, Savitz DA, Loomis D et al. Relation between ambient air quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997-2000. Am J Epidemiol 2005; 162(3): 238-52. [ Links ]
24. Obi-Osius N, Misselwitz B, Karmaus W, Witten J. Twin frequency and industrial pollution in different regions of Hesse, Germany. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61(6): 482-7. [ Links ]
25. Schoeps D, Almeida MF, Alencar GP, França Jr I, Novaes HMD, Siqueira AAF et al. Fatores de risco para mortalidade neonatal precoce. Rev Saúde Pública 2007; 41(6): 1013-22. [ Links ]
Correspondência: Received: 18/02/2011 Trabalho realizado
pela Universidade Católica de Santos - UNISANTOS.
Mariana Tavares Guimarães.
Alameda Itu, 395 Apto. 81
Jardim Paulista - São Paulo, SP CEP 01421-000.
Final version: 09/08/2011
Conflito de interesse: nada a declarar.
Financiamento: This work was part of a larger project entitled " Epidemiological study on resident population in metropolitan area of Santos - Santos Estuary: Evaluation of effect and exposure indicators to environmental contaminants" funded by The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - CNPq (50/2005 - number 402663/2005-5).
Trabalho realizado pela Universidade Católica de Santos - UNISANTOS.