INTRODUCTION
Sleep provides recover to the wake state and it has a relevant impact on the physiologic activities, such as cognitive/emotional behavior, cardiovascular function, and pain perception modulation1. Sleep is also a wellness domain and its perception impacts one’s health status, being associated to mortality and morbidity indices as soon as it is a focus of health promotion in the world1,2. Therefore, to study sleep effects in a population we should consider biological, behavioral and contextual factors2 in analyses of epidemiologic surveys.
Sleep disorders have short and long-term repercussions on body systems, such as physical vigor and cardiovascular diseases in elderly people3,4 and social situations in which older individuals need to respond appropriately5. In addition, sleep restorative function (SRF) deficits, related to poor sleep habits, cause fatigue in daily activities6.
International estimates indicate that sleep-wake cycle disorders reach all age groups and genders, but they seem to manifest distinctly in life cycles mediated by contextual6,7, behavioral and mental disorders8. In Brazil, epidemiological surveys related to sleep disorders are scarce, mostly restricted to regional subpopulations studies or focusing on morbidity. However, evidence indicates high prevalence ranges for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and insomnia in elderly people4, most common sleep complaints, associated to depression and cardiovascular risk9.
For detecting sleep disorders, a neurologist consultation and polysomnography are needed. However, theses method are scarce and expensive in Brazil, and sleep perception of insomnia/EDS, for example, is easily identified by assessing some complaints, like difficulty of initiating, maintaining, or returning to sleep as well as daytime sleepiness and speed assessment of sleep status and wellness1. Then, sleep complaints referred by population and treated as normal could be related to poor wellness and health conditions, mainly chronic diseases in the pre-clinical conditions or severe pathological stages in body system3,4.
Studies on behavior’s sleep and self-perception of health status has a potential relevance for decision making in public health and clinical management due to the evidence scarcity as to sleep wellness and disabilities in Brazilian elderly population. Then, we analyzed the National Health Survey (NHS) in Brazil, from 2013, and estimate how is the sleep wellness of Brazilian elderly population with the reduction in SRF and insomnia/EDS complaints as well as the relation between health status, behavioral and social factors related to these sleep self-perceptions.
METHODS
The NHS was developed in the Brazilian territory in 2013 and presented a complex sampling cross-sectional survey design, conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE) in partnership with Fundação Oswaldo Cruz.
The present study works with secondary and open access data and does not require any approval by the ethics committee.
Permanent private households’ population grouped into conglomerates called census section were included, covering capitals, metropolitan regions and countryside Indigenous villages, barracks, military bases, lodges, camps, boats, penitentiaries, penal colonies, prisons, chains, asylums, orphanages, convents and hospitals10 were excluded from the study.
Sampling size was determined from the simple random sampling assumption because there is no information on the entire population to estimate the indicators for groups. The 2010 Demographic Census with proportion of households containing population groups of interest was used as reference. Thus, a sample size of 81,357 participants was estimated as older than 1810, and data analyzes were stratified for elderly people.
The sample was selected from a complex conglomerate sampling process, configured in three stages. The primary sampling unit was the census sector, followed by households in the sector, and the resident one. In these last two stages, the observation units were selected by simple random sample10.
The participant answered the survey instrument with thematic modules ordered from A to W, analyzing only the modules that addressed the individual characteristics of residents, such as demographic, social, lifestyle, perception of health, and chronic diseases, as well as characteristics of the household pertinent to the study. For further information on the sampling design, consult Freitas10.
The study outcome was SRF, measured with a self-report that questioned: “In the last two weeks, how often did you have problems because you did not feel rested and willing during the day, feeling tired, lacking energy?”, producing an ordinal variable grouped into the following response levels: “no days”, “less than half the days” and “more than half the days/almost every day”. This question was performed after the secondary outcome question. Thus, lacking energy is related to sleep.
The independent variables were grouped according to the NHS modules.
Demographic variables: gender (male and female), age group, marital status (living with a partner or alone), ethnicity (white and nonwhite), paid or unpaid occupation (yes or no), and social stratum, (AB, C and DE). Social stratum was created from the Brazilian Economic Classification Criteria of the Brazilian Market Research Association (Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Pesquisas - ABEP)11.
Health variable: self-reported presence of sleep complaints with the question: “In the last two weeks, how often did you have problems with sleep, such as difficulty falling asleep, waking often during the night or sleeping more than usual?”, being a proxy variable for insomnia/EDS complaints, which also generated an ordinal variable with the responses: “no days”, “less than half the days” and “more than half the days/almost every day”; chronic disease patient (yes and no) and disability for activities of daily living (yes and no). Disability was measured by the presence of physical, mental and/or sensory disability (yes and no).
Health perception variables: general health perception (good, regular and bad), oral health perception (good, regular and bad), depressive symptoms perception (yes and no), behavioral oscillation perception (yes and no). Lifestyle variables: does not smoke, does physical activity for the last three months, and does not consume alcoholic beverages or consumes less than once a month (yes or no) were considered healthy habits. Body Mass Index (BMI) was classified as low weight, eutrophic, and overweight/obese.
Social network variables: “Do you participate in organized social activities (clubs, community or religious groups, centers for elderly coexistence, etc.)?”, yes or no.
Household variables: Location of the household (urban or rural), resident/bedroom relation (adequate ≤3), computer and internet (yes or no) and for the elderly, cellular and internet (yes or no).
In a complex sampling design, the data analysis is based on the weighed estimation of the sample units in the three stages. After that, each observation incorporated its sample weight to calculate descriptive and inferential interval estimates of the analysis. Thus, it allowed the correction of the effect of the sampling plan added to the correction for non-responses.
The data were described using estimates of prevalence and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The association inferences between the primary and secondary outcomes in relation to the independent variables were made with the Cox regression, with adjustment for complex design, and with Wald χ2 significance test. In addition, prevalence ratio (PR) estimate was determined as effect measurement and α ≤ 0.05. Two models were built: model 1 with ordinal outcomes for test gradient effect, and model 2 with binary outcome, in which the answer was the worst situation, symptoms described as “more than half the days/almost every day”.
RESULTS
Elderly people totaled 11,109 of the participants interviewed, of which 57.7% (95%CI 56.1 - 59.3%) were women and 56.4% (95%CI 54.7 - 58.0%) were between 60 and 69. Further details of the sample description are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Unadjusted and adjusted association for self-perception of restorative function of sleep with Cox regression in complex sampling design in the Brazilian elderly population.
Variable | n | % (95%CI) | Reduction of Restorative Function Complaints | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Unadjusted Model | Final Model 1 | Final Model 2 | ||||||
PR | 95%CI | PR | 95%CI | PR | 95%CI | |||
Gender | ||||||||
Female | 6,586 | 57.7 (56.1 - 59.3) | 1.48 | 1.30 - 1.67 | 1.12 | 0.98 - 1.29 | 1.18 | 0.95 - 1.45 |
Male | 4,523 | 42.3 (40.7 - 43.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Lives with his/her partner | ||||||||
Yes | 5,004 | 57.0 (55.4 - 58.5) | 0.92 | 0.83 - 1.03 | 1.08 | 0.96 - 1.21 | 1.04 | 0.87 - 1.24 |
No | 6,105 | 43.0 (41.5 - 44.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Ethnicity/Color | ||||||||
White | 5,296 | 54.2 (52.5 - 55.9) | 0.94 | 0.83 - 1.06 | 1.09 | 0.97 - 1.22 | 1.18 | 1.01 - 1.39 |
Non-White | 5,813 | 45.8 (44.1 - 47.5) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Age | ||||||||
60-69 | 6,170 | 56.4 (54.7 - 58.0) | 1.01 | 0.84 - 1.20 | 1.02 | 0.93 - 1.12 | 1.08 | 0.94 - 1.25 |
70-79 | 3,441 | 30.0(28.5 - 31.5) | 1.03 | 0.85 - 1.25 | 1.04 | 0.96 - 1.13 | 1.06 | 0.93 - 1.21 |
80 or more | 1,498 | 13.6 (12.6 - 14.7) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Social Stratum | ||||||||
DE | 4,514 | 32.4 (31.0 - 33.9) | 1.33 | 1.11 - 1.58 | 1.07 | 0.84 - 1.35 | 0.73 | 0.49 - 1.08 |
C | 4,235 | 41 (39.4 - 42.7) | 1.20 | 1.02 - 1.43 | 1.01 | 0.84 - 1.21 | 0.76 | 0.56 - 1.03 |
AB | 2,360 | 26.6 (24.7 - 28.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
BMI | ||||||||
Low Weight | 1,713 | 15.3 (14.1 - 16.5) | 1.01 | 0.84 - 1.20 | 0.95 | 0.80 - 1.14 | 1.22 | 0.95 - 1.56 |
Overweight | 4,899 | 45.5 (43.9 - 47.1) | 1.13 | 0.99 - 1.29 | 1.06 | 0.94 - 1.20 | 1.12 | 0.93 - 1.35 |
Eutrophic | 4,497 | 39.2 (37.7 - 40.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Lifestyle | ||||||||
Healthy | 1,753 | 15.3 (14.2 - 16.4) | 1.14 | 0.96 - 1.35 | 0.97 | 0.89 - 1.06 | 1.07 | 0.80 - 1.44 |
Not healthy | 9,353 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Difficulty in daily activities | ||||||||
Yes | 3,642 | 31.7 (30.3 - 33.2) | 1.98 | 1.77 - 2.22 | 1.13 | 1.01 - 1.27 | 1.36 | 1.12 - 1.65 |
No | 7,467 | 68.3 (66.8 - 69.7) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Depressive Symptoms | ||||||||
Yes | 3,697 | 33.4 (31.8 - 35.1) | 6.88 | 6.00 - 7.89 | 3.37 | 2.87 - 3.97 | 3.77 | 2.88 - 4.96 |
No | 7,412 | 66.6 (64.9 - 68.2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Behavioral Oscillation | ||||||||
Yes | 2,973 | 26.4 (24.9 - 27.9) | 4.76 | 4.25 - 5.33 | 1.75 | 1.53 - 1.99 | 1.81 | 1.46 - 2.24 |
No | 8,136 | 73.6 (72.1 - 75.1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
General Health Perception | ||||||||
Bad | 1,459 | 11.9 (11.0 - 13.0) | 4.61 | 3.91 - 5.44 | 1.50 | 1.23 - 1.82 | 3.12 | 2.31 - 4.21 |
Regular | 4,773 | 43.3 (41.8 - 44.9) | 2.10 | 1.83 - 2.42 | 1.21 | 1.03 - 1.41 | 1.65 | 1.26 - 2.16 |
Good | 4,877 | 44.7 (43.1 - 46.3) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Oral Health Perception | ||||||||
Bad | 1,069 | 7.9 (7.2 - 8.8) | 1.83 | 1.54 - 2.18 | 1.11 | 0.92 - 1.35 | 1.13 | 0.89 - 1.44 |
Regular | 3,348 | 29.5 (27.9 - 31.1) | 1.52 | 1.34 - 1.73 | 1.21 | 1.08 - 1.37 | 1.11 | 0.91 - 1.37 |
Good | 6,692 | 62.6 (60.9 - 64.2) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Insomnia/EDS | ||||||||
Yes | 3,789 | 34.1 (32.6 - 35.7) | 4.73 | 4.20 - 5.34 | 2.45 | 2.14 - 2.79 | 3.46 | 2.77 - 4.33 |
No | 7,321 | 65.9 (64.4 - 67.4) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Chronic Health Condition | ||||||||
Yes | 8,543 | 78.6 (77.2 - 79.9) | 2.57 | 2.11 - 3.14 | 1.20 | 0.99 - 1.44 | 1.58 | 1.11 - 2.40 |
No | 2,566 | 21.4 (20.1 - 22.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Disability | ||||||||
Yes | 2,319 | 21.3 (19.9 - 22.7) | 1.40 | 1.22 - 1.60 | 1.01 | 0.89 - 1.13 | 1.15 | 0.95 - 1.40 |
No | 8,790 | 78.7 (77.3 - 80.1) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Social support | ||||||||
Yes | 2,736 | 25.1 (23.6 - 26.6) | 0.82 | 0.31 - 2.16 | 1.14 | 1.01 - 1.30 | 0.94 | 0.76 - 1.17 |
No | 8,373 | 74.9 (73.4 - 76.4) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Occupation | ||||||||
Yes | 2,529 | 22.5 (21.1 - 23.9) | 0.86 | 0.70 - 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.77 - 1.02 | 0.87 | 0.66 - 1.15 |
No | 8,580 | 77.5% (76.1 - 78.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Resident/bedroom | ||||||||
Unsuitable | 10,485 | 92 (91.0 - 92.9) | 1.31 | 1.05 - 1.65 | 0.92 | 0.74 - 1.14 | 1.16 | 0.77 - 1.74 |
Suitable | 624 | 8.0 (7.1 - 9.0) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Computer and internet | ||||||||
Yes | 2,939 | 33.9 (32.235.7) | 0.94 | 0.82 - 1.08 | 1.44 | 1.01 - 2.07 | 1.58 | 0.89 - 2.79 |
No | 8,170 | 66.1 (64.3 - 67.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
Housing | ||||||||
Urban | 8,948 | 86.0 (85.1 - 86.9) | 1.01 | 0.85 - 1.19 | 0.99 | 0.85 - 1.16 | 1.32 | 1.02 - 1.72 |
Rural | 2,161 | 14.0 (13.1 - 14.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Final model 1: adjustment for ordinal outcome; Final model 2: adjustment for worst outcome, last category of variable; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval; PR: prevalence ratio; BMI: body mass index; EDS: excessive daytime sleepiness.
Complaints of insomnia/EDS reach 34.1% (95%CI 32.6 - 35.7%), of which 14.8% (95%CI 13.7 - 16.0%) presents in less than half of days and 19.4% (95%CI 18.0 - 20.7%) almost every day of the week. Approximately 30% (95%CI 27.2 - 30.6%) of the elderly related RSF reduction, with 17.2% of them (95%CI 16.0 - 18.4%) having it in less than half the days of the week and 12.0% (95%CI 11.0 - 13.0%), almost every day.
SRF reduction is commonly experienced almost every day by white individuals (PR2 = 1.18; 95%CI 1.01 - 1.39), living in urban area (PR2 = 1.32; 95%CI 1.02 - 1.72), and chronic health condition (PR2 = 1.58; 95%CI 1.11 - 2.40) only. Regular oral health perception (PR1 = 1.21; 95%CI 1.08 - 1.37), social support (PR1 = 1.14; 95%CI 1.01 - 1.30), and computer and internet use (PR1 = 1.44; 95%CI 1.01 - 2.07) were related to SRF reduction in less than half the days of week.
Depressive symptoms (PR1 = 3.37; 95%CI 2.87 - 3.97/PR2 = 3.77; 95%CI 2.88 - 4.96), behavioral oscillation (PR1 = 1.75; 95%CI 1.53 - 1.99/PR2 = 1.81; 95%CI 1.46 - 2.24), difficulties in domestic functional activities (PR1 = 1.13; 95%CI 1.01 - 1.27/PR2 = 1.36; 95%CI 1.12 - 1.65), bad health perceptions (PR1 = 1.50; 95%CI 1.23 - 1.82/PR2 = 3.12; 95%CI 2.31 - 4.21) and regular health perceptions (PR1 = 1.21; 95%CI 1.03 - 1.41/PR2 = 1.65; 95%CI 1.26 - 2.16) also revealed an association with the outcome in the form of a gradient variable as well as for the worst outcome of tiredness every day (Table 1).
DISCUSSION
The present study highlights that decline in sleep wellness occur practically in one third of the Brazilian population. Sleep complaints and SRF reduction could be the main manifestations of sleep health conditions, like sleep-related respiratory morbidities, such as snoring and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome12, and of wellness status in health individuals. That is why we report representative estimates for complaints related to sleep quality that illustrate the perception of the Brazilian population.
Bittencourt et al. identified that 63% of Brazilians have some sleep dysfunction, with insomnia being present in 33% of them13. Similar scenarios were identified in an epidemiological survey in the Netherlands, where 32.1% had some sleep disorder.14 Differently, sleep disorders between ranging from 9 to 14% of adults were reported in New Zealand15, revealing contextual differences in their conditioning factors16. Differences in the estimates occur due to the measurement method, like perception or diagnosis. Our study measured the complaints with self-perception, and we were interested in detecting the sleep wellness that coincided with prevalence diagnosis.
The manifestation of sleep complaints seems to be related to several conditioning factors. When we analyze the influence of gender on sleep, several authors have reported the occurrence of sleep disorders differently as to gender, especially in women17. Social factors, such as double or triple workload18, and biological characteristics, such as increased association with mood disorders4 and menopause19, may be related to higher frequency of sleep-related complaints in females, even in non-urban realities in Brazil20.
The factors most strongly associated to SRF reduction are depressive symptoms, behavioral oscillation or emotional lability, and chronic health conditions in elderly populations in Brazil. Several studies have reported that depressive behavior, emotional lability and psychiatric disorders21, and chronic disease22,23 present an intimate connection with sleep disorders. Such health conditions are strongly conditioned by catastrophic thoughts, causing central sensitization of painful or other perception stimuli, which have shown an association with low sleep efficiency22 and alteration of the hypothalamic function in the suprachiasmatic nucleus, which is responsible for the circadian rhythm. It seems that this association is due alterations in the SRF, potentiating the deleterious effects of psychogenic dysfunctions and pain perception, as shown in the study of individuals with fibromyalgia23 and osteoarthritis22, causing the chronic conditions to have worse clinical manifestations.
Another characteristic strongly associated to sleep complaints is the general health self-perception, also related to psychogenic disorders24. Individuals with negative perceptions tend to have worse health outcomes, such as chronic health conditions and higher risk of death, than those with good perceptions24. Hale et al.16 also identified an association between bad health perception and impaired sleep quality. In Brazil, Lima et al.25 observed that reductions in sleep duration or their excess are associated to prior self-reported health status in the elderly population. Our findings also show that elderly participants with functional disability for activities of daily living in research are more associated to insomnia/EDS and SRF, which mediated for self-perceived health.25
The elderly living in urban areas as well as the use of computers and internet have an SRF reduction. There is evidence that urbanization produces a reduction in sleep time2, and that noise produced by car traffic26 and the abuse of media27 and computer7 in urban areas is related to the occurrence of sleep disorders.
There is a curious fact about the association of low social support for the elderly population with the perception of sleep disorders. The literature points to several beneficial aspects regarding social support to general health28. Evidence suggests that low social network also shows a modulating effect on sleep disorders with the prediction of cardiac inflammatory markers29. However, in a study conducted in Montreal, Canada, it was found that strong social network indicators are positively associated to restless sleep30, which shows us an expression of contextual effects modified according to other social conditions, such as gender. Other findings revealed that there is no relation of social support in sleep function in a cohort of elderly people after multilevel adjustment and five-year follow-up31. This powered the multidimensional and inter-relational health and wellness theories about sleep and health promotion actions to reduce costs and morbidity.
It is prudent to mention some limitations of our study. First, it is a cross-sectional study that analyzes secondary national survey data, which can predispose to the information biases from collection to storage, data availability, and reverse causality. Second, the measurement of complaints of insomnia and EDS were performed together, not being able to identify them separately, and refer to short-term complaints. Third, it is not possible to make more in-depth contextual inferences due to the linkage impossibility with database with ecological information. Finally, there is still no direct information on income, especially for adults in the NHS database, which links the economic analysis only to the ownership.
Despite these limitations, this study brings new evidence on sleep conditions in the Brazilian elderly population, revealing this as a large public health problem, in addition to its relation with other disorders, psychogenic and chronic diseases, making them subject to aggravation according to studies in the area of sleep. Social determinants are manifested differently in sleep complaints, which implies the need to apply public health and intersectoral policies as to work, social and health care.
CONCLUSION
Sleep complaints are highly prevalent in the Brazilian population as well as SRF reduction, which suggests actions or policies aimed at a better management of wellness on sleep domain, considering that this is a sensitive indicator to the quality of life and its multidimensional reflects. In addition, the selective sleep complaints manifestation in relation to health to condition, ethnicity, social support, and urbanization imply measures aimed at structuring aspects of social organization.
Sleep complaints are strongly related to clinical manifestations of psychogenic disorders, such as depressive symptoms and emotional lability, as well as the presence of chronic diseases and a bad health perception, useful for promoting health-wellness initiatives in public health and clinical praxis.