SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue3Mechanical characterisation of porous glass reinforced hydroxyapatite ceramics: Bonelike®Dye incorporation in polyphosphate gels: synthesis and theoretical calculations author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Materials Research

Print version ISSN 1516-1439On-line version ISSN 1980-5373

Mat. Res. vol.6 no.3 São Carlos Apr./June 2003

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392003000300005 

A new route to process diamond wires

 

 

Marcello FilgueiraI*; Guerold BobrovnitchiiI; Daltro Garcia PinattiII

IUniversidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense, Laboratório de Materiais Avançados, Av. Alberto Lamego, 2000, 28015-620 Campos dos Goytacazes - RJ, Brasil
IIDepartamento de Engenharia de Materiais DEMAR/FAENQUIL, Polo Urbo Industrial, Gleba AI6, 12600-000 Lorena - SP, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

We propose an original route to process diamond wires, denominated In Situ Technology, whose fabrication involves mechanical conformation processes, such as rotary forging, copper tubes restacking, and thermal treatments, such as sintering and recrystallisation of a bronze 4 wt.% diamond composite. Tensile tests were performed, reaching an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 230 MPa for the diameter of Æ = 1.84 mm. Scanning electron microscopy showed the diamond crystals distribution along the composite rope during its manufacture, as well as the diamond adhesion to the bronze matrix. Cutting tests were carried out with the processed wire, showing a probable performance 4 times higher than the diamond sawing discs, however its probable performance was about 5 to 8 times less than the conventional diamond wires (pearl system) due to the low abrasion resistance of the bronze matrix, and low adhesion between the pair bronze-diamond due to the use of not metallised diamond single crystals.

Keywords: diamond wires, In Situ Technology, swaging, sintering.


 

 

1. Introduction

Diamond wires are cutting tools for rocks (marble, granite etc.), concrete and substitutes of saws in general1-5. They are composed of an AISI 316 stainless steel cable over which are assembled diamond sintered pearls with 10 to 12 mm in diameter spaced 25 mm between each one. The slabbing operation is carried out with a driven pulley coupled to a motor which promotes the diamond wire rotation. The wire is passed through coplanar holes previously made in the rock, and the tension imposed to the wire is made by a motor mounted on trails, coupled to the cutting system. The utilization of this slabbing technology has been expanded all over the world due to its advantages on the other techniques.

Linear and circular saws, grinding wheels, wire saw pearls among others, are diamond cutting tools used in the slabbing, cutting, and polishing of dimension stones, ceramic materials and nonferrous metals in general6. There are a wide range of types of materials used in the manufacture of these tools, but the most employed is the system metal bond matrixdiamond crystals7. Diamonds are impregnated in the metal matrix via two ways: electrodeposition or sintering. In the electrodeposited tools there are only a monolayer of diamonds on the tool surface, while the sintered ones show diamond crystals distributed into the bulk and on the surface of the tools, and is cheaper and easier to process. In this sense, sintered diamond cutting tools are more usual7,8.

The metal matrix selection is based on the abrasivity of the material to be cut or polished. For highly abrasive materials such as concrete, SiC, Si3N4, Al2O3, tungsten bond is used. Cobalt bond is employed in the cutting of materials whose abrasivities are similar to the granites. Bronze, cobalt bonds and its alloys are used for marbles. Brass, bronze or copper bonds are employed in the cutting of ceramics, glasses, and nonferrous metals7.

The sintering is normally accomplished by hot pressing. In this case, the powder or green body (in the desired form) is submited to sintering at the same time in which it is pressed into a mold. A classical example is performed by Contardi9, explaining a method to process diamond pearls for cutting wires, where the metal matrix bond + diamond crystals mix is confined into holes of a graphite mold. This mold is put into a resistive vacuum furnace chamber coupled to a press. The press punches conduct the current for the green bodies sintering, at the same time that press them into the mold holes. The productivity is high, about 960 pearls per 8 h.

In this work we present an alternative route to process diamond composites, denominated In Situ Technology, which involves conventional sintering and swaging (rotary forging) of the metal matrix-diamond mix, instead of the conventional hot pressing route. It was produced wires of bronze 4 wt.% diamond for use as diamond wires and linear saws in general. Table 1 gives the comparison of geometric data of diamond wires fabricated by pearls and in situ techniques. Diamond volume and surface in the in situ wire are 20 to 30 times larger than pearls wire, and cutting section of rocks are decreased to 40%10.

 

 

2. Experimental

Table 2 shows the typical concentration vs. density of diamond in cutting tools. In the present work we used a concentration 50 (2.2 carat/cm3; 0.44 g/cm3; 0.1264 cm3 of diamond/cm3 of tool) since this is the concentration used to cut dimension stones. Figure 1 shows the processing flow chart of the bronze/diamond cap, starting with bronze 4 wt.% diamond. The materials used in this work are: De Beers SDA + 65 40/50 mesh diamonds, commercial atomised copper powder (75/60 mm), and OFHC copper tubes.

 

 

 

 

3. Results and Discussion

Microstructural and tensile behaviour

Figure 2a shows the longitudinal microstructure of the initial sintered bronze 4 wt.% diamond at Æ = 8.00 mm. The diamond distribution is relatively spaced. Samples were cupped in backelite and ground by 80 mesh emery paper. 1H2O + 1HNO3 picking did not work because corrosion was not uniform and pitting tooke place in the bronze/diamond interface. Figure 2b shows the cross section of the diamond wire at Æ = 1.84 mm (R = 18.90X). It can be observed that during the wire area reduction by swaging the diamond crystals keeps their physical integrity. This result is of great importance because it gives viability to the in situ processing route, never used before. For bronze 4 wt.% diamond, the rupture load is shown as a function of the external cap diameter along the various stages of the processing (Fig. 3a). The curve of Fig. 3a does not extrapolate to zero, but to Æ = 1.20 mm (extrapolation of the dashed line), and this diameter is the limit of the contact diamond to diamond. With it, the rupture load is 180 N, indicating an adherence between bronze and diamond of 160MPa (s »180 N/[p.Æ2/4] »180 N/[(p/4).(1.20)2.10m 2] »160 MPa). In Fig. 3b the UTS remains constant at 230 MPa for diameters up to Æ = 1.84 mm, after which it decreases. The data of Fig. 3b refers to the UTS values for the same material, indicating that Æ =1.84 mm is the optimum diameter for this composition and mean crystal diamonds size of 350 mm.

 

 

 

 

Measurements are made in the annealed condition (650 °C/20 min) and data are an average over 5 to 7 samples. The experimental average modulus of elasticity is E = 11.5 GPa, but for annealed commercial bronze, UTS = 260 MPa and E = 16 Gpa8,9. The presence of diamond up to Æ = 1.84 mm has minor influence in UTS, but it decreases E (more flexible material) since it is now distributed as a composite. Conventional diamond wire has a rupture load between 1200 and 3000 N (UTS = 60 and 150 MPa, considering Æ = 5.00 mm for the AISI 316 core). The bronze 4 wt.% diamond at Æ = 1.84 mm has a rupture load of 611 N (230 MPa), higher than the AISI 316 core. All the tensile tests are performed according to the Ref. 11.

Bronze Diamond Adherence

Figure 4 show the interface bronze-diamond in the various stages of the processing (as sintered Æ = 8.00 mm, Æ = 5.00 mm, f = 3.30 mm, and f = 1.84 mm). The Cu layer is removed with 1H2O + HNO3 in order to expose the diamond cutting faces. There are no gaps (faults) between bronze and diamond. There is no interdiffusion between them, and the adherence is smaller than the UTS = 230 MPa of the bronze 4 wt.% diamond.

 

 

Preliminary cutting of marble

Table 3 presents the data of marble cutting by means of a monolithic bronze 4 wt.% diamond wire. Figures 5a, b and c show micrographs of the wire before, in the middle and in the end of the cutting trial, respectively, being made in a linear saw frame of 0.22 m in length, resulting in 1188 × 10m3 /0.22 m = 0.54 m2/m of cut area per meter of wire. In considering that, the braided wires will have 12 bronze 4 wt.% diamond wires, and we expect a cutting area capacity of 6.5 m2/m, it corresponds to 5 (30 m2/m) to 8 (50 m2/m) times less than the pearls-diamond wire. The reason for this poor performance is the low abrasion resistance of the bronze material shown in Fig. 5, where abrasion of the loose diamond powder is clearly seen. Another comparison can be done with results of reference12 for granite cutting with a circular saw of f = 0.7 mm with a diamond volume of V = 1.7 × 105 m3 and a perimeter of l = 1.7 mm (V = 105 m3/m,, effective diamond DAS 100,40/50 mesh and concentration 30). The measured cutting capacity of the circular saw was 0.62 m2 resulting in 0.62/1.7 = 0.35 m2/m. For marble, the cutting capacity is the double (0.73 m2/m). The cutting capacity of in situ linear saw frame (0.54 m2/m for diamond volume of v =1.7 × 106 m3) is 4.4 times higher than the Ref. 12 results [(0.54/1.7 × 106) : (0.73/105 )]. In the sequence of development, it will be used W, Co, W-Co alloy, Fe or Fe-Co alloy to improve abrasion resistance. It is recognized that the critical point is the adhesion between the diamond and the matrix. Metal coated diamond will also improve the cutting area capacity of the in situ wire.

 

 

 

 

One of the new feature of the in situ diamond wire is its possibility to be welded after rupture. Fig. 5.d shows the micrograph of a silver welded part of the in situ monolithic wire (f = 1.69 mm). Mechanical resistance is maintained (UTS = 226 MPa) in the welded area and diamond of that region is not lost. This characteristic is a considerable improvement over the pearl-diamond wire that is completely lost after rupture.

 

4. Conclusions

A diamond wire was obtained by an alternative route called in situ process by swaging and sintering with maintenance of diamond crystal integrity. By means of this route it is possible to decrease the diameter of the wire from 10 to 6 mm, decreasing then three times the section of the rock to be cut.

Abrasion of the bronze matrix was too high indicating the need of development into two directions: use of metal coated diamond in order to improve adhesion and use of another metal matrix, such as W-Co, or Fe-Co alloys.

For the bronze 4 wt.% diamond rope, with f = 1.65 mm diameter, the UTS = 170 MPa fulfils the requirements of tensile strength to operate as a diamond wire cutting rope.

Adherence between the pair bronze-diamond was weak, due to the fact that the diamonds crystals used in this work were free of metallisation.

The function of silver welding was satisfactory after rupture, promoting the constant recycling of the external cutting rope.

When comparing the cutting data in marble using the in situ external rope, its probable performance was about 4 times higher than the conventional sawing discs, but 5 to 8 times less than the conventional pearl system diamond wires, due to the low abrasion resistance of the bronze matrix and weak adherence between bronze-diamond.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors thanks to DEMAR/FAENQUIL for the equipments used in the experiments.

 

References

1. Thoreau, B. Diamond Impregnated Wire for Sawing Hard Abrasive Stones. Industrial Diamond Review. v. 2, p. 94-95, 1984.         [ Links ]

2. Daniel, P. More Granites Succumb to Diamond Wire. Industrial Diamond Review. n. 5, p. 187-194, 1986.         [ Links ]

3. Daniel, P. Granite Quarrying Cut Waste & Costs. Industrial Diamond Review. n. 1, p. 14, 1986.         [ Links ]

4. Daniel, P. Slate Without Waste. Industrial Diamond Review. n. 4, p. 200-203, 1993.         [ Links ]

5. Pinzari, M. Quarrying Stone by Diamond Wire in Italy. Industrial Diamond Review. v.5, p. 231-336, 1989.         [ Links ]

6. Filgueira, M.; Pinatti, D.G. Production of Diamond Wire by Cu 15%v Nb in situ Process. Proceedings of the 15th International Plansee Seminar, Reutte/Austria, Plansee Holding AG, v. 1, p. 360-374, 2001.         [ Links ]

7. Przyklenk, K. Diamond Impregnated tools Uses and Production. Toolmaking, Industrial Diamond Review, v. 4, p. 192-195, 1993.         [ Links ]

8. Filgueira, M. Production of in situ Diamond Wires. PhD. Thesis, State University of North Fluminense, p. 1-153, 2000.         [ Links ](in portuguese)

9. Contardi, G.L. Wire Beads Economic Productions. Tool - making, Industrial Diamond Review, v. 5, p. 256, 1993.         [ Links ]

10. Filgueira, M.; Pinatti, D.G. In situ Diamond Wires Part II: The Bronze 4 Weight % Diamond Composite Cutting Rope. Journal of Material Processing Technology.         [ Links ]In Press.

11. Anual Book of ASTM Standards. Section 3Metals Testing Methods and Analytical Procedures v. 3, n. 1, 1985.        [ Links ]

12. Diamond Wear. in Diamond in industry. Stone. ed. De Beers, p. 40-43, 1995.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received: October 7, 2002
Revised: December 8, 2002
Trabalho apresentado no 1º Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira em Materiais, Rio de Janeiro, Julho de 2002.

 

 

*e-mail: marcello@uenf.br

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License