The use of niobium based catalysts for liquid fuel production

ARTICLES PRESENTED AT THE XV CBECIMAT, NATAL - RN, NOVEMBER DE 2002

The use of niobium based catalysts for liquid fuel production

Frank Martin Reguera^II; Lucia Regina Raddi de AraujoI,^*; Marta Cristina Picardo^I; Fábio de Oliveira Bello^I; Cynthia Fraga Scofield^I; Nídia Maria Ribeiro Pastura^I,II; Wilma de Araujo Gonzalez^I

^IUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Inst. Química, Rua São Francisco Xavier, 524, 20559-900 Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil

^IIInstituto Militar de Engenharia, Dep. Engenharia Química Praça General Tibúrcio, 80, 22290-270 Urca, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil

ABSTRACT

The catalytic properties of niobium based catalysts were investigated in the conversion of oleic acid to liquid fuels at atmospheric pressure and at 623 K. The catalytic tests were performed in a fixed bed and continuous flow reactor using an acid to catalyst ratio equal to 4 and N₂ as carrier gas. The reaction products were analyzed by gas chromatography and acidity measurements. NH₃ temperature programmed desorption, N₂ adsorption-desorption (BET method) and Xray diffraction were also performed in order to determine the structural and acidic properties of the catalysts. From the catalytic tests, it was detected the formation of compounds in the range of gasoline, diesel and lubricant oils. Higher catalytic activity and selectivity for diesel fuel were observed for the catalysts NbOPO₄ and H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ that possesses higher acidities and surface areas.

Keywords: niobium, oleic acid, bio-diesel

1. Introduction

Diesel fuel plays an essential role in the economic activity of any country as it is used in different kinds of vehicles, electric generators, agricultural equipments, etc. Due to the worldwide expected growth rate of its consumption as well as the reduction of petroleum resources, the interest and researches for suitable alternative diesel fuels have increased in the last years¹.

An alternative to diesel must be economically competitive, easily available and acceptable from both technical and environmental viewpoints. Vegetal oils (constituted of 90-98% triglycerides) and their derivatives fulfill all of these requirements. Moreover, the comparison of petrodiesel and biodiesel shows that biodiesel presents many beneficial characteristics as its biodegradability, a high cetane number and the absence of sulfur and aromatics which contributes to reduce environmental pollutants.

In the exploitation of vegetable oil for substitution to diesel, three distinct routes are possible²:

• The direct use of pure vegetable oil. Although this route is economically attractive, it brings serious problems of adjustment as the physical and chemical properties of the vegetable oil, such as density, viscosity and flash point, are quite different from diesel. Another point to be considered is that the products obtained from vegetal oil combustion would be also different and this could not only compromise the metallic parts of the engine but also generate new pollutants in the atmosphere, possibly sufficiently toxic.

• The vegetable oil transesterification, which converts the natural triglycerides into monoesters of ethyl or methyl alcohol. This process improves the physical properties of the fuel approaching its characteristics to those of petrodiesel. However it brings some disadvantages as, for example, high ethyl or methyl alcohol consumption and the generation of a high amount of glycerin as by-product.

• The catalytic degradation of the triglycerides with production of a mixture of hydrocarbons almost similar to diesel. Concerning the quality of the fuel, this route is the best one, since it would be necessary no modification or adaptation of the engines.

Although in the last years many catalytic systems have been investigated for the conversion of vegetal oils to fuel, their effective action is still little known^3-8.

The great amounts of raw materials in Brazil concerning both vegetable oils and niobium, as well as the knowledge that niobium based catalysts can be efficient in different industrial processes^9-10, have motivated us in our research. So, the aim of this work is to study the viability of the use of niobium as a catalytic agent in the conversion reaction of the oleic acid to hydrocarbons in the range of diesel oil (C₁₄-C₁₈). The oleic acid was chosen as reactant as it is the major constituent of the soy oil.

2. Experimental

2.1. Catalysts Preparation

The start materials were niobium phosphate (NbOPO₄) and niobic acid (H₈Nb₆O₁₉), which were donated by the Brazilian Company of Metallurgy and Mineration (CBMM). Three samples were prepared: NbOPO₄, Nb₂O₅ and H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ . NbOPO₄ was submitted to calcination at 623 K. Nb₂O₅ resulted from the thermal treatment of H₈Nb₆O₁₉ up to 623 K and the third catalyst H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ was prepared by wetness impregnation of a 12% H₃PO₄ solution into the support Nb₂O₅.Then, this sample was dried overnight at 373 K and calcined in an oven at 623 K for 2 h.

2.2. Catalysts Characterization

The textural properties of the samples such as specific area, average pore diameter and pore volume were determined by N₂ physical adsorption-desorption (BET method) at its normal boiling temperature (77 K) with an ASAP 2000 Micromeritics apparatus. Prior to the analysis, the catalyst was submitted to a preheating treatment at 423 K under vacuum of 15 ´ 10^-6 mmHg. The BET isotherms were taken at pressures between 45-160 mmHg using super dry N₂.

The acid sites distributions were obtained with the NH₃ temperature programmed desorption technique (TPD-NH₃). Initially, the samples were treated for 0.5 h under pure He flow of 60 mL/min using a heating rate of 10 K/min up to 473 K. The chemisorption of 4%NH₃/He was carried out at room temperature for 0.5 h and the excess of fisisorbed molecules was removed by vacuum during 1.5 h at the same temperature. Finally, the ammonia termodesorption analysis was performed using a heating rate of 10 K/min up to 773 K.

Powder X-ray data for structural analysis were collected with a Siemens X-ray diffractometer using Cu Ka radiation over a 1h40min period from 2q = 3–80°, with a 1.0 s step.

2.3. Catalytic Tests

The oleic acid conversion to hydrocarbons had been carried out at 623 K in a fixed bed and continuous flow reactor. A scheme of the catalytic unit is illustrated in Fig. 1. The catalytic bed was constituted by 5 g of catalyst and 5 cm of small glass balls. The catalyst was pre-treated in situ during 2 h under N₂ flow at 623 K. After this treatment, the reactant was introduced into the reactor inlet by a pump (reactant flow = 20.5 g/h). The liquid products were collected after passing through a condenser connected to reactor outlet. During the test, two samples were withdrawn from the reactor effluents at 30 min and 60 min for posterior acidity value determination (Ma) as well as for chromatographic analysis (GC). These analysis were performed in order to bring informations about the degree of acid descarboxilation and to obtain the hydrocarbon product distribution in the ranges of gasoline, diesel and lubricant oil. The material that remained in the reactor after the reaction was weighed and considered as a residue.

2.4. Acidity Measurements of the Liquid Products

A solution of ethyl alcohol and benzene (volumetric ratio equal to 1) was initially added to a weighed amount of the liquid product. Afterwards, it was titrated with an alcoholic solution of 0,1 mol/L KOH using phenolphtalein as indicator. The amount of free acid was obtained using the following expression:

where:

Ma = acidity measurement

V_KOH = volume of KOH spent in titration

M_KOH = KOH solution concentration

f_KOH = correction factor for KOH solution concentration

Pa = weight of the sample product

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Specific Area and Porosity

The results obtained from textural characterization of the samples are shown in Table 1. All catalysts had presented type IV adsorption-desorption isotherms according to Brunauer-Emmett-Teller classification, which increases the confidence of the method in the determination of porous properties.

The results obtained with the Nb₂O₅ catalyst are in good agreement with those reported in the literature¹¹. Comparing the textural properties of Nb₂O₅ and NbOPO₄ catalysts, it is observed that both have practically the same specific areas. Nevertheless, NbOPO₄ catalyst has higher pore volume and pore diameter values. This behavior can be explained by the presence of a lamelar structure for the NbOPO₄ compound where the formed layers consist of octaedrons [NbO₆] connected in the equatorial plan by tetrahedrons [PO₄] , as can be seen in Fig. 2¹². Individual layer is electrically neutral and interacts by hydrogen bonding, allowing the occlusion of neutral molecules that increase the interlamelar distance and thus the volume of this solid¹².

Concerning the H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ catalyst, the impregnation of phosphoric acid to Nb₂O₅ support caused a decrease in its specific area value. This is probably due to the condensation of PO₄^3- ions on the surface of the Nb₂O₅ support and/or due to the bonding of these ions to niobium with formation of phosphate species, which would be also responsible for the increasing of the pore diameter value.

The pore volume distribution curves of the samples are presented in Fig. 3.

As appears from this figure, NbOPO₄ catalyst exhibits a monomodal pore distribution, with mesoporosity in the range of 40 Å to 100 Å and having 65 Å as a medium value. Both Nb₂O₅ and H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ catalysts presented a bimodal pore distribution in the ranges of 20 Å to 70 Å and 200 Å to 1000 Å, respectively. Comparing the curves of the H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ sample with that of the corresponding pure support, it is observed a slight narrowing of the peak in the 20 Å to 70 Å region, probably due to a partial blockage of the mesoporous caused by phosphoric acid incorporation to Nb₂O₅.

3.2. X-ray Diffraction

The X-ray diffraction patterns of the prepared catalysts are given in Fig. 4. The analysis of this figure demonstrates that both H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ and Nb₂O₅ catalysts are amorphous. However, for the NbOPO₄ sample, small peaks are detected corresponding to the crystalline plans 020 (2q = 28^o (d~3,19)), 110 (2q = 20^o (d~4,5)) and 130 (2q = 45^o (d~2,02)), indicating that the material has a low cristallinity and is not totally amorphous as the other samples. The detected peaks are characteristics of the b-phase of NbOPO₄^13-14.

3.3. Ammonia Temperature Programmed Desorption

NH₃-TPD profiles are displayed in Fig. 5. From this figure, it is clear that the NbOPO₄ catalyst profile is shifted towards higher temperatures as compared to the other samples, indicating that stronger acid sites are present on its surface.

The peak areas values allowed us to obtain the total acidities of the catalysts expressed in mmols of NH₃/g of the catalyst. These informations are reported in Table 2. In order to make a semi-quantitative determination, the desorption curves were partitioned into chosen temperature ranges, assuming that the ammonia retained on stronger sites desorbs at higher temperatures as mentioned in the literature¹⁵ and these results are also shown in Table 2.

As it can be noted, H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ catalyst exhibits the highest total acidity followed by Nb₂O₅ and NbOPO₄ catalysts. However, NbOPO₄ catalyst presented the highest strong acid sites distribution (T > 623 K) and this behavior must be probably caused by the loss of water in its structure, which promotes a strong NH₃ adsorption on the support.

3.4. Catalytic Tests

Table 3 presents the average results obtained from catalytic conversion reactions at 623 K, where samples 1 and 2 correspond to the aliquots withdrawn after 30 min and 60 min of time on stream, respectively.

From this table, it is possible to assess the descarboxilation activity of the catalysts by comparing the products acidity measurement (Ma): the lower it is, the more efficient is the catalyst in the descarboxilation process. The acidity measurement of the reactant, oleic acid, was also included in Table 3 in order to provide data comparison.

The catalytic activities are compared as a function of the liquid products formation, that is, the ability of converting the oleic acid reactant to hydrocarbon products, using the following expression:

The results from Table 3 suggest the occurrence of a thermal cracking process in the pre-heating zone of the reactor for the non-catalyzed reaction which resulted in a small amount of liquid products.

On the basis of experimental data, it is obvious that the presence of a catalytic agent substantially increases the oleic acid conversion. The catalytic activity of the pentoxide niobium sample was significantly enhanced by impregnating this support with phosphoric acid. As previously mentioned, the phosphoric acid incorporation to Nb₂O₅ leads to an increase of the total acidity but also to a decrease of the specific area value. Hence, the catalytic promotion effect may be attributed mainly to an increase of the acidic properties of the support.

A maximum of activity was found for NbOPO₄ catalyst that exhibits conversions up to 82%. The results of catalytic activity did not follow the same general trend as the TPD results. This is not surprising, since the TPD technique measures all sites capable of adsorbing ammonia and only a fraction of these is likely to be active in the acid oleic descarboxilation reaction. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that strong acid sites are required for catalyzing this reaction.

After all tests, it was observed a viscous residual product formation, mainly with H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ and NbOPO₄ catalysts.

3.5. Gas Chromatography

Table 4 presents the weight percentage of products obtained from the catalytic oleic acid conversion to hydrocarbons. The average products distribution was expressed taking into account the different hydrocarbon ranges and it was determined by using a standard chromatogram for comparison.

For the non-catalyzed reaction, no hydrocarbon product was detected. The presence of the catalyst promoted the formation of compounds in the range of gasoline, diesel oil and lubricant oil for all of the samples. The addition of phosphoric acid improved the performance of Nb₂O₅ catalyst. The best result concerning biodiesel selectivity was obtained with NbOPO₄ catalyst. The simultaneous analysis of the oleic acid descarboxilation with the chromatographic results allow us to conclude that the NbOPO₄ catalyst is the most efficient for the process, since it showed the highest conversion (73% and 82%) and selectivity values (33% of compounds in the range of diesel oil). This result is probably related to its particular properties: it is a solid with a lamelar phosphate structure with high pore volumes and a monomodal mesopores distribution. Moreover, this solid presents some crystallinity and a higher amount of strong acid sites in comparison to the other samples.

4. Conclusions

The addition of phosphoric acid to niobium pentoxide caused an increase of the total acidity resulting, however, in the partial blockage of the pores. The comparison between the H₃PO₄/Nb₂O₅ catalyst and the pure Nb₂O₅ support suggested that phosphoric acid impregnation improved the efficiency in the oleic acid descarboxilation. Nevertheless, NbOPO₄ catalyst was the most efficient in this process: it showed the best results in both activity and selectivity for diesel fuel. This is probably related to its strong acid sites and high specific area value. So, both textural and acidic properties play an important role in the catalytic performance of the conversion of oleic acid to liquid fuels. NbOPO₄ seems to be a promising catalyst for oil reform reaction.

Received: February 12, 2003; Revised: November 13, 2003

Articles presented at the XV CBECIMAT, Natal - RN, November de 2002

• 1. Srivastava, A.; Prasad, R. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 4, p. 111-133, 2000.
• 2. Benedito, S.E.; Valverde, L.F.M.; Sousa, R.B. et al. Revista Militar de Ciência e Tecnologia, v. XVII, p. 15-25, 2000.
• 3. Ma, F.; Hanna, M.A. Bioresource Technology, v. 70, p. 1-15, 1999.
• 4. Alcantara, R.; Amores, J.; Canoira, L. et al. Biomass and Bioenergy, v. 18, p. 515-527, 2000.
• 5. Bender, M. Bioresource Technology, v. 70, p. 81-87, 1999.
• 6. Schuchardf, U.; Sercheli, R.; Vargas, R.M. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society, v. 9, n. 1, p. 199-210, 1998.
• 7. Santos, F.R.; Ferreira Netto, J.C.; Costa, S.R. Química Nova, v. 21, n. 5, p. 560-563, 1998.
• 8. Costa Netto, P.R.; Rossi, F.S.; Zagonel, G.F. et al. Química Nova, v. 23, n. 4, p. 531-537, 2000.
• 9. Schmal, M.; Aranda, D.A.G.; Alves, P.S. et al. Anais do X Congresso Brasileiro de Catálise, Salvador, BA, v. 1, p. 105-112, 1999.
• 10. Picardo, M.C.; Bello, F.O.; Araujo, L.R.R. et al. Livro de Resumos do XLII Congresso Brasileiro de Química, Rio de Janeiro, v. 1, p. 486, 2002.
• 11. Benedito, E.S.; Valverde, L.F.M.; Sousa, R.B. et al. Anais do X Congresso Brasileiro de Catálise, Salvador, BA, v. 2, p. 37-43, 1999.
• 12. Chernonukov, N.R.; Egonov N.P.; Mochalova, I.R. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, v. 23, p. 1627, 1978.
• 13. Martins, R.L.; Schitine, W.J.; Castro, F.R. IV Seminário Brasileiro de Catálise, Canela, RS, v. 1, p. 569-579, 1987.
• 14. Reguera, F.M. tese doutorado, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, RJ, 2002.
• 15. Silva, C.L.T.; Camorim, V.L.L.; Zotin, J.L. et al., Catalysis Today, v. 57, p. 209-217, 2000.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  29 June 2004
• Date of issue
  June 2004

History

• Reviewed
  13 Nov 2003
• Received
  12 Feb 2003