versão impressa ISSN 1516-1439
Mat. Res. v.8 n.4 São Carlos out./dez. 2005
Vicente Braz Trindade*; Ulrich Krupp; Behzad Zandi Hanjari; Songlan Yang; Hans-Jürgen Christ
Institut für Werkstofftechnik, Universität Siegen, Germany
Generally, oxide scales formed on high Cr steels are multi-layered and the kinetics are strongly influenced by the alloy grain boundaries. In the present study, the oxidation behaviour of an austenite steel TP347 with different grain sizes was studied to identify the role of grain-boundaries in the oxidation process. Heat treatment in an inert gas atmosphere at 1050 °C was applied to modify the grain size of the steel TP347. The mass gain during subsequent oxidation was measured using a microbalance with a resolution of 10-5 g. The scale morphology was examined using SEM in combination with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Oxidation of TP347 with a grain size of 4 µm at 750 °C in air follows a parabolic rate law. For a larger grain size (65 µm), complex kinetics is observed with a fast initial oxidation followed by several different parabolic oxidation stages. SEM examinations indicated that the scale formed on specimens with smaller grain size was predominantly Cr2O3, with some FeCr2O4 at localized sites. For specimens with larger grain size the main oxide is iron oxide. It can be concluded that protective Cr2O3 formation is promoted by a high density of fast grain-boundary diffusion paths which is the case for fine-grained materials.
Keywords: austenitic steel, Cr2O3 formation, grain boundary diffusion, high-temperature oxidation
The formation of a protective Cr2O3 scale is required to avoid degradation by severe corrosion processes for alloys used in high temperature (up to 1000 °C). A number of investigations1-5 have been carried out to improve the understanding of the growth mechanism of Cr2O3 scales. The influence of grain size of the oxide6-7 as well as the effect of doping by rate earth elements (e.g. yttrium or cerium) on the growth kinetics of Cr2O3 have been carefully investigated and even the diffusion coefficients of chromium and oxygen in the bulk and along grain boundaries of Cr2O3 are available. It is well established5,8,9 that Cr2O3 scales grow by counter-current diffusion of Cr and O.
In addition to the understanding of the mechanisms of Cr2O3 scales growth, it is important to know the minimum bulk concentration of Cr, which is necessary to form a protective scale on the entire surface, in order to prevent oxidation of the base material, e.g. Fe or Ni. Several investigations10 reported a minimum value of Cr in the range between 18 wt. (%) and 20 wt. (%). However, this concentration range may depend strongly on the diffusion properties of Cr in the alloy. As a consequence, the grain size of the alloy should play an important role for the supply of Cr to the alloy/oxide interface, since the diffusivity of Cr along grain boundaries is much higher than that in the bulk11.
In the present study, the oxidation behaviour of the austenitic steel TP347, which is used in superheaters of power plants, with different grain sizes was studied to quantify the role of grain-boundaries on the oxide scale formation.
2. Material and Experimental Procedure
The chemical composition of the austenitic steel TP347 is given in Table 1. The initial grain size of 4 µm was coarsened to a grain size of 65 µm by applying a heat treatment at 1050 °C in inert gas atmosphere for 112 hours.
Samples with a dimension of (10 x 10 x 3) mm3 were used for thermogravimetric study. The samples were ground using SiC paper down to 1200 grid. They were finally cleaned ultrasonically in ethanol prior to oxidation. Hole of 1 mm diameter serve for hanging the samples in a thermobalance by means of a quartz thread. Isothermal thermogravimetry was carried out using a microbalance with a resolution of 10-5 g in combination with an alumina reaction chamber and a SiC furnace. After oxidation the specimens were embedded in epoxy and carefully polished using diamond paste down to 1 mm and cleaned ultrasonically in ethanol. The oxide layers were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in combination with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX).
3. Results and Discussion
Figure 1 shows the thermogravimetrically measured oxidation kinetics of TP347 of different grain sizes during exposure at 750 °C to laboratory air. The sample with a grain size of 4 µm obeys a parabolic rate law. At a grain size of 65 µm, oxidation kinetics is more complex and exhibit a stepwise parabolic oxidation.
Figure 1 Thermogravimetrically measured oxidation kinetics of TP347 with different grain sizes exposed at 750 °C to laboratory air for 120 hours.
Figure 2 shows cross sections of scales formed on TP347 with different alloy grain sizes after oxidation in laboratory air at 750 °C for 120 hours.
For the fine-grained specimen a very thin protective Cr2O3 scale is formed, but at some sites, this oxide layer is not totally protective and allows the subsequent formation of iron oxide nodules (Figure 2a), which grow outward and inward. On the coarse-grained specimen the oxide scale consists of an outer scale of iron oxide and an inner scale of mixed oxide phases containing Fe, Cr, Mn and Ni, similar to the oxide nodules formed on the fine-grained specimens. EDS element mappings of this scale are shown in Figure 3.
It can be seen in Figure 4a that the main oxide formed on top of the grain interior of the coarse-grained specimen is iron oxide while an Cr-enriched oxide is formed along the grain boundaries. The formation of a protective Cr2O3 scale on specimens with the smaller grain size is favoured by a higher Cr flux from the substrate bulk to the substrate/oxide interface as a consequence of the higher grain boundary density (Figure 4b).
Using literature data for the Cr diffusion coefficient in the bulk and along grain boundaries of a Fe18Cr10Ni steel11 in combination with equations for the Cr flux from the bulk to the specimen surface derived by Lobb and Evans1, a considerable contribution of the grain boundary diffusion to Cr2O3 scale formation on specimens with small grain size must be assumed (Figure 5). Figure 5 also shows that the Cr flux along grain boundaries for the specimen with small grains is strongly influenced by the grain boundary width. Unfortunately, the grain boundary width can not be defined precisely. According to Fisher12 this value should be in the range of (0.5-1) nm.
The formation of Cr2O3 is particularly facilitated when the alloy grain size is smaller than 5 µm (Figure 6). Figure 6 promotes the idea of using engineered materials, such as coatings consisting of Cr2O3 forming alloys, with very small grain sizes.
From the thermodynamic point of view, a rather low concentration of Cr is sufficient in order to form a Cr2O3 scale on Fe-Cr steel. However, the critical minimum concentration is much higher than that predicted by the thermodynamic analysis, when the kinetics of Cr supply to the alloy/oxide interface is taken into account. As shown in this study, the alloy grain size is an important factor to be considered. As a consequence of the high Cr diffusivity along alloy grain boundaries, the fine-grained alloy requires a smaller Cr concentration than the coarse-grained alloy to form a slow growing Cr2O3 scale on the entire surface of the specimen.
It is also important to mention the effect of easy Cr2O3 oxide nucleation on the fine-grained specimen as reported by Lobb and Evans1, in addition to the higher flux of Cr along grain boundaries of the alloy with smaller grain. Both reasons may facilitate the formation of a protective Cr2O3 scale in a synergetic manner.
Once the oxide growing on the material is mainly Cr2O3, it is possible to predict the growth kinetics of the oxide scale by using the model developed by Carl Wagner13 and successfully applied by Tsai et al.5 to Cr2O3. Diffusion of metal cations and oxygen anions within the bulk oxide and oxide grain boundaries were taken into account separately. The diffusion coefficient applied are those measured by Sabioni et al.14. Figure 7 shows the Cr2O3 thickness as a function of time calculated on the basis of sole diffusion i) through the oxide bulk, ii) along oxide grain boundaries; and iii) using an effective diffusion coefficient of Cr and O, according to Sabioni et al.14.
The oxide scale growth calculated on the basis of the effective value of the diffusion coefficient of Cr and O within the Cr2O3 scale is in reasonable agreement with the experimental data obtained in this study. The small deviation found can mainly be attributed to the formation of iron oxide nodules at some locations, which leads to higher oxidation kinetics. The values calculated by using only bulk diffusion and only grain boundary diffusion are tremendously lower or higher, respectively, than the value observed experimentally.
A slowly growing Cr2O3 oxide was observed on specimens with small grain size due to the high density of grain boundaries leading to fast outward Cr transport along the substrate grain boundaries. Specimens with larger grain size form iron oxide growing outward and a mixed Fe, Cr, Mn and Ni oxide growing inward. When adding Cr to high-temperature alloys in order to ensure the formation of a slowly growing superficial Cr2O3, one has to consider the high diffusivity of Cr along substrate grain boundaries, which may significantly contribute to the Cr transport toward the substrate/oxide interface in materials with small grain size. Therefore, a alloy with larger grain size requires a higher bulk Cr concentration to establish a protective Cr2O3 scale. Precise information about the grain boundary width would be necessary in order quantitatively assess the Cr flux resulting from the substrate grain boundaries. Nevertheless, in the case of the fine-grained specimens a prediction of the growth kinetics is possible by applying Wagner's theory for the case of a single external oxide scale formation using the effective diffusion coefficient of Cr and O within the oxide scale.
This research has been supported by the EU project OPTICORR and by the Brazilian Research Foundation (CAPES) through a fellowship to one of the authors (V.B.Trindade).
1. Lobb RC, Evans HE. Formation of protective oxide film on chromium-depleted stainless steel. Metal Science. 1981; 267-274. [ Links ]
2. Baer DR, Merz MD. Differences in oxides on large- and small-grained 304 stainless steel. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1980; 11A:19731980. [ Links ]
3. Dunning JS, Alman DE. Rawers, JC. Influence of silicon and aluminium additions on the oxidation resistance of a lean-chromium stainless steel. Oxidation of Metals. 2002; 57:409-425. [ Links ]
4. Pérez FJ, Pedraza F, Sanz C, Hiero MP, Gómez C. Effect of thermal cycling on the high temperature oxidation resistance of austenitic AISI 309S stainless steel. Materials and Corrosion. 2002; 53:231-238. [ Links ]
5. S. Tsai C, Huntz AM, Dolin C. Growth mechanism of Cr2O3 scales: Oxygen and chromium diffusion, oxidation kinetics and effect of ytrium. Materials Science and Engineering A. 1996; 212:6-13. [ Links ]
6. Basu SN, Yurek GJ. Yurek. Effect of alloy grain size and silicon content on the oxidation of austenitic Fe-Cr-Ni-Mn-Si alloys in pure O2. Oxidation of Metals. 1991; 36:281-315. [ Links ]
7. Yurek GJ, Eisen D, Garrat-Reed A. Oxidation Behavior of a Fine-Grained Rapidly Solidified 18-8 Stainless Steel. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1982; 13A:473-485. [ Links ]
8. Huntz, AM. Parabolic Laws During High Temperature Oxidation: Relations with the Grain Size and Thickness of the Oxide. Journal of Materials Science Letters. 1999; 18:1981-1984. [ Links ]
9. Smith, AF. The Diffusion of Chromium in Type 316 Stainless Steel. Metal Science. 1975; 9:375-378. [ Links ]
10. Bürgel R. Handbuch Hochtemperaturwerkstofftechnik. Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig, 1998. [ Links ]
11. Kaur I, Gust W. Fundamentals of Grain and Interphase Boundary Diffusion. Ziegler Press, Stuttgart; 1988. [ Links ]
12. Fisher JC. Calculation of diffusion penetration curves for surface and grain boundary diffusion. Journal of Applied Physics. 1951; 22:74-82. [ Links ]
13. Wagner C. Atom Movements. American society of metals, Cleveland 1951. [ Links ]
14. Sabioni ACS, Lesage B, Huntz AM, Pivin J, Monty C. Self-diffusion in Cr2O3, I. Chromium diffusion in single crystals. Philosophical Magazine A. 1992; 66:333-350. [ Links ]
Received: July 19, 2004; Revised: June 20, 2005