Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Influence of annealing on magnesioferrite nanoparticles synthesized by a sol-gel/combustion method

Abstract

Nanocrystalline particles of magnesioferrite (MgFe2O4) were prepared by a sol-gel/combustion method using iron nitrate, Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, magnesium nitrate, Mg(NO3)2.6H2O, and citric acid, C6H8O7.H2 O, and annealed for 2 hours at 400, 500 and 600 °C. The average particle size, determined by X ray diffraction, was found to depend on the annealing temperature and varied from 〈D〉 = 8.1 to 〈D〉 = 17.8 nm. By measuring at several temperatures the relative intensity of the Mössbauer spectra due to superparamagnetic particles and to ferrimagnetic particles, we determined the size distribution of the nanoparticles in the samples. It was found to be a log-normal distribution with a most probable diameter that varied from Dm = 6.4 to 17.2 nm and a full width at half-height ΔD in the 5-6 nm range.

nanoparticles; mössbauer spectroscopy; magnesioferrite


LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Influence of annealing on magnesioferrite nanoparticles synthesized by a sol-gel/combustion method

Ronaldo Sergio de BiasiI,* * e-mail: rsbiasi@ime.eb.br, lh.cardoso@yahoo.com.br, josebran@int.gov.br, dalber@cbpf.br, jbat@if.ufrgs.br ; Lúcia Helena Guimarães CardosoI,* * e-mail: rsbiasi@ime.eb.br, lh.cardoso@yahoo.com.br, josebran@int.gov.br, dalber@cbpf.br, jbat@if.ufrgs.br ; José Brant de CamposII,* * e-mail: rsbiasi@ime.eb.br, lh.cardoso@yahoo.com.br, josebran@int.gov.br, dalber@cbpf.br, jbat@if.ufrgs.br ; Dalber Ruben SanchezIII,* * e-mail: rsbiasi@ime.eb.br, lh.cardoso@yahoo.com.br, josebran@int.gov.br, dalber@cbpf.br, jbat@if.ufrgs.br ; João Batista Marimon da CunhaIV,* * e-mail: rsbiasi@ime.eb.br, lh.cardoso@yahoo.com.br, josebran@int.gov.br, dalber@cbpf.br, jbat@if.ufrgs.br

ISeção de Engenharia Mecânica e de Materiais, Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Pr. Gen. Tibúrcio, 80, SE/4, Urca, 22290-270 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil

IIDivisão de Processamento e Caracterização de Materiais, Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia, Av. Venezuela, 82, Saúde, 20081-312 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil

IIIInstituto de Física, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, R. São Francisco Xavier, 524, Maracanã, 20550-013 Rio de Janeiro - RJ, Brazil

IVInstituto de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves 9500, 91501-970 Porto Alegre - RS, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Nanocrystalline particles of magnesioferrite (MgFe2O4) were prepared by a sol-gel/combustion method using iron nitrate, Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, magnesium nitrate, Mg(NO3)2.6H2O, and citric acid, C6H8O7.H2 O, and annealed for 2 hours at 400, 500 and 600 °C. The average particle size, determined by X ray diffraction, was found to depend on the annealing temperature and varied from 〈D〉 = 8.1 to 〈D〉 = 17.8 nm. By measuring at several temperatures the relative intensity of the Mössbauer spectra due to superparamagnetic particles and to ferrimagnetic particles, we determined the size distribution of the nanoparticles in the samples. It was found to be a log-normal distribution with a most probable diameter that varied from Dm = 6.4 to 17.2 nm and a full width at half-height ΔD in the 5-6 nm range.

Keywords: nanoparticles, mössbauer spectroscopy, magnesioferrite

1. Introduction

Nanosized ferrites display physical and chemical properties which may be quite different from those of their bulk counterparts. Magnesioferrite (MgFe2O4) is one of the most interesting, because, due to its small magnetocrystalline anisotropy, superparamagnetic properties are still present at relatively low temperatures and/or high magnetic fields. The purpose of this work was to investigate the influence of annealing on the average particle size and particle size distribution of MgFe2O4 nanoparticles prepared using the sol-gel/combustion method1, a fast and relatively inexpensive technique. The average particle size was determined by X ray diffraction, while the particle size distribution was obtained by measuring at several temperatures the relative intensity of the Mössbauer spectra due to superparamagnetic particles and to ferrimagnetic particles, a method that has already been applied successfully2 to another nanosized ferrite, CoFe2O4.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Sample preparation

Analytical grade Fe(NO3)3.9H2O, Mg(NO3)2.6H2O, and C6H8O7.H2 O were dissolved in deionized water to obtain the starting solution. The concentrations of ferric nitrate, magnesium nitrate and citric acid were 0.5, 0.25 and 0.75 M. The solution was stirred for 4 hours at 70 °C, heated to 90 °C and kept at this temperature until the sol turned into a transparent gel. The gel was then heated to 200 °C for 20 minutes so that auto-combustion would take place. Finally, the product was annealed in a furnace for 2 hours at different temperatures.

2.2. Measurements

X ray diffraction patterns were obtained using an XPert Pro Panalitical diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). The average particle size was calculated from line broadening using the TOPAS application3, academic edition.

Mössbauer spectra were recorded at several temperatures between 25 K and room temperature in a homemade instrument using a source of 57Co(Rh) with an activity of about 50 mCi.

3. Experimental Results and Analysis

Table 1 shows the average particle sizes, as calculated from the X ray spectra shown in Figure 1, for samples as prepared and after annealing at three different temperatures.


The Mössbauer spectra of sample 2 in Table 1 are shown in Figure 2 for several different measurement temperatures. While at room temperature there is a doublet due to superparamagnetic relaxation, at lower temperatures one sees a sextet which is characteristic of bulk magnesioferrite4. By taking the ratio of the area under the doublet to the area under the sextet, it is possible to estimate the volume fraction of unblocked particles for each measurement temperature. The result is shown in Figure 3, where the dots are the experimental points and the line is a fit to a cumulative log-normal function



where T is the absolute temperature, erf(T) is the error function, C1 and C2 are constants and μ and δ are adjustable parameters. The best fit was obtained with C1 = 0.64, C2 = 0.61, μ = 5.70 and δ = 0.64.

The distribution of unblocking temperatures of the system is given by5,6

where C is a normalization constant.

The temperature dependence of Equation 2 may be converted to a dependence on particle diameter (thus yielding the particle size distribution) using the relation5,6

where D is the particle diameter, )〈D〉 is the average particle diameter, as estimated from the X ray results, and )〈Tc〉 is the average blocking temperature, given by

The result is shown in Figure 4 (curve 2), which is a log-normal distribution with average diameter )〈D〉 = 13.2 nm, most probable diameter Dm = 11.6 nm and full width at half maximum ΔD = 5.5 nm. Similar results for samples as prepared and annealed at different temperatures are shown in Table 1 and Figure 4.


4. Conclusions

The sol-gel/combustion technique has been used to prepare MgFe2O4 nanoparticles, which were annealed at different temperatures. X ray diffraction patterns show broad peaks in the positions corresponding to the crystal structure of magnesioferrite. Mössbauer spectra exhibit superparamagnetic behavior, confirming that the particles are in the nanometric range. Analysis of the broadening of the X ray lines shows that the average particle size increases with increasing annealing temperature. Analysis of the temperature dependence of the Mössbauer spectra of as prepared and annealed samples yields fairly narrow log-normal distributions of particle sizes. The results suggest that the sol-gel/combustion technique may be used to synthesize nanosized MgFe2O4 powders whose average size can be controlled by subsequent annealing without appreciably changing the distribution of particle sizes.

Received: September 18, 2008;

Revised: April 2, 2009

  • 1. Huang Y, Tang Y, Wang J, Chen Q. Synthesis of MgFe2O4 nanocrystallites under mild conditions. Materials Chemistry and Physics 2006; 97(2-3):394-397.
  • 2. de Biasi RS, Figueiredo ABS, Fernandes AAR, Larica C. Synthesis of cobalt ferrite nanoparticles using combustion waves. Solid State Communications 2007; 144(1):15-17.
  • 3. Bruker AXS. DIFFRACplus TOPAS Available from: <http://www.bruker-axs.de/topas.html>. Access in: 02/04/2009.
  • 4. Chen Q, Rondinone AJ, Chakoumakos BC, Zhang ZJ. Synthesis of superparamagnetic MgFe2O4 nanoparticles by coprecipitation. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 1999; 194(1-3):1-7.
  • 5. de Biasi RS, Folly WSD. Use of ferromagnetic resonance to determine the size distribution of magnetic particles. Physica B 2002; 321(1-4):117-119.
  • 6. de Biasi RS, Gondim EC. Use of ferromagnetic resonance to determine the size distribution of gamma-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Solid State Communications 2006; 138(6):271-274.
  • *
    e-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      24 July 2009
    • Date of issue
      June 2009

    History

    • Accepted
      02 Apr 2009
    • Received
      18 Sept 2008
    ABM, ABC, ABPol UFSCar - Dep. de Engenharia de Materiais, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235, 13565-905 - São Carlos - SP- Brasil. Tel (55 16) 3351-9487 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: pessan@ufscar.br