Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Electrodeposition of polypyrrole films on aluminum surfaces from a p-toluene sulfonic acid medium

Abstract

Electrodeposition of polypyrrole films on aluminum from aqueous solutions containing p-toluene sulfonic acid and pyrrole was performed by cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic technique. The influence of applied current density on the morphology of the films was studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy. The films displayed a cauliflower-like structure consisting of micro-spherical grains. This structure is related to dopand intercalation in the polymeric chain. Films deposited at higher current density were more susceptible to the formation of pores and defects along the polymeric chain than films deposited at lower current density. These pores allow the penetration of aggressive species, thereby favoring the corrosion process.

electrodeposition; polypyrrole; aluminum; p-toluene sulfonic acid


REGULAR ARTICLES

Electrodeposition of polypyrrole films on aluminum surfaces from a p-toluene sulfonic acid medium

Andréa Santos Liu; Marcia Cristina Bezerra; Liu Yao Cho* * e-mail: liu@univap.br

Organic Electrochemistry Laboratory, Institute for Research and Development - IP&D, Universidade do Vale do Paraiba - UNIVAP, Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911, 12244-000 São José dos Campos - SP, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Electrodeposition of polypyrrole films on aluminum from aqueous solutions containing p-toluene sulfonic acid and pyrrole was performed by cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic technique. The influence of applied current density on the morphology of the films was studied by Scanning Electron Microscopy. The films displayed a cauliflower-like structure consisting of micro-spherical grains. This structure is related to dopand intercalation in the polymeric chain. Films deposited at higher current density were more susceptible to the formation of pores and defects along the polymeric chain than films deposited at lower current density. These pores allow the penetration of aggressive species, thereby favoring the corrosion process.

Keywords: electrodeposition, polypyrrole, aluminum, p-toluene sulfonic acid

1. Introduction

Currently chromates are used to protect aluminum surfaces against corrosion. However, these inhibitors have high toxicity and environment problems1,2. Conducting polymers represent a class of materials that might replace chromate conversion coating in aluminum corrosion control3-5.

Barrier, inhibitor, anodic protection, and the mediation of oxygen reduction have been suggested to explain the aluminum corrosion protection of conducting polymer6.

Proposed mechanism to explain the anticorrosion activity of conducting polymer is:

1) The reaction of metal (M) oxidation and conducting polymer (CP) reduction, which results in the growth of a passive oxide M(OH)y layer.

M + CP+m + y H2O M(OH)y + CPº + y H+

2) The reaction of polymer oxidation and oxygen reduction.

O2 + 2 H2O + CPº CP+m + 4 OH-

Polypyrrole (PPy) is a conducting polymer that has been extensively investigated because of its high conductivity and environmental stability as well as its possible use in a wide range of applications such as membranes, sensors, batteries, and anti-corrosion films7,8.

PPy films can be synthesized from aqueous or organic media by chemical and electrochemical methods. Electrochemical synthesis is more advantageous since the coating properties can be controlled by varying parameters such as current density, monomer concentration, electrolyte solution, and pH9.

Various research groups have reported the electrodeposition of PPy on aluminum surfaces in different electrolytes, such as sulfuric acid, sulfonates, sulfosuccinate, and oxalic acid10-14. The type of pre-treatment (polishing or galvanostatic activation), electrolyte, and solvent (aqueous or organic) affect the electropolymerization process on aluminum surfaces.

Our previous works have shown the electrodeposition of adherent and homogeneous PPy films on aluminum surfaces from aqueous solutions containing carboxylic acids. Doped films can be deposited depending on the synthesis conditions, such as electrolyte, pH, and deposition potential15,16. The electrolyte plays an important role in determining the porosity of the oxide film formed under the PPy film. Additionally, the electrolyte can participate as dopant and incorporate onto PPy film16.

Studies have also shown that the corrosion protection of aluminum surfaces by PPy films depends on synthesis conditions. Saidman et al. reported that localized corrosion occurred when the polymer-coated electrode was exposed to chloride ions, when the polymer was electrodeposited on aluminum from nitric acid17. Ocon et al. showed a good performance corrosion of the PPy films electrodeposited in oxalic acid on aluminum surfaces18. Additionally, Paloumpa et al. studied the corrosion protection of aluminum surfaces by PPy chemically deposited from phosphoric acid and conclude that coated surfaces presented excellent corrosion resistance19.

Aromatic sulfonates can act as dopants to PPy and influence the electrical and electrochemical properties of PPy films20, 21.

Although the corrosion performance of PPy films deposited in sulfonic acid media have been reported for iron surfaces22, the corrosion protection of aluminum surfaces coated with PPy films deposited from a p-toluene sulfonic acid medium has not been investigated.

This work presents results of the electrodeposition of PPy films on aluminum surfaces in aqueous solutions containing p-toluene sulfonic acid and the behavior of the films with respect to corrosion prevention of the aluminum surfaces.

2. Experimental

Electrochemical experiments were carried out using a Potentiostat/Galvanostat (Model MQPG-01 Microquimica) and were performed at 25 ºC in a one-compartment cell containing three electrodes. The working electrodes were 99.9% w aluminum inlaid on Teflon®, with a 0.53 cm2 disc shaped exposed area. The reference electrode was a saturated Ag/AgCl, Cl- electrode, and the auxiliary electrode was a platinum wire.

The aluminum surfaces were polished with abrasive paper (220, 400, 600 and 1200 grits) and rinsed with distilled water before each electrochemical experiment.

PPy electrodeposition was carried out by cyclic voltammetry by scanning the potential between -1.0 and 2.0 V vs. Ag/AgCl at a sweep rate of 5.0 mV/s. The PPy film growth was also performed using the galvanostatic technique, by applying current densities ranging between 1.0 and 10.0 mA.cm-2 to the working electrode.

The electrolytic solution was prepared by dissolving 0.2 mol.L-1 p-toluene sulfonic acid + 0.5 mol.L-1 pyrrole in distilled water.

The morphology of surfaces coated with the polypyrrole films was analyzed using a Jeol® JXA-840A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The micrographs were obtained using a 15 keV electron beam.

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to analyze the compositions of the PPy films. The spectra were obtained with a spectrometer model SPECTRUM-2000 (Perkin Elmer). The analysis conditions were: wavenumber range of 4000-400 cm-1, 4 cm-1 resolution, 40 scans, and room temperature (25 ºC). KBr pellets were prepared with solid p-toluene sulfonic acid and with the PPy films removed from the aluminum surfaces. The analysis of the liquid pyrrole was performed using the capillary liquid film technique.

The corrosion protection of aluminum surfaces by PPy films was investigated by potentiodynamic polarization curves in a 0.1 mol.L-1 NaCl solution (pH = 5.9), which was not stirred, open to the atmosphere, and at a temperature of 25 ºC. The experiments were carried out by varying the electrode's potential, at 5 mV/s, from -1.0 V up to +1.5 V and reversing the potential down to -1.0 V. The corrosion potential and the corrosion current density were obtained from the Tafel plots.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Electrodeposition of polypyrrole

Our previous work reported on the electrodeposition of homogeneous and adherent PPy films using 0.2 mol.L-1 electrolyte (organic acids) and 0.5 mol.L-1 monomer. In 0.2 mol.L-1 electrolyte, a porous aluminum oxide layer was formed, favoring the PPy film growth. Furthermore, the higher the monomer concentration was, the faster the oxidation reaction of pyrrole at the aluminum/electrolyte solution interface, and the electropolymerization process commenced at lower oxidation potential15,16. Higher electrodeposition potential was undesirable since overoxidized PPy films were formed.

Figure 1 shows the first cycle for the cyclic voltammetry performed to investigate the electrodeposition of PPy from 0.2 mol.L-1 p-toluene sulfonic acid solutions (pH 1.5) and 0.8 mol.L-1. The cyclic voltammogram for the aluminum electrode in monomer free 0.2 mol.L-1 p-toluene sulfonic acid aqueous solution showed that the surface was passive. Curve 2 in Figure 1 illustrates that the anodic currents increase at about 0.75 V which indicates pyrrole oxidation.


The polymerization process was also performed using the galvanostatic technique. Figure 2 shows the potential-time curves obtained for PPy deposition from aqueous solutions containing p-toluene sulfonic acid (0.2 mol.L-1) and pyrrole (0.5 mol.L-1) while varying the current density between 0.5 and 10.0 mA.cm-2.


Increases in current density (a) shifted the working potential to values that are more positive and (b) increased PPy film thickness. At lower current densities (0.5 and 2.5 mA cm-2), homogeneous PPy films on aluminum surfaces did not form. However, at 5.0 mA.cm-2, the PPy film was homogeneous and the potential stabilizes at 0.79 V vs. Ag/AgCl and remained constant even about 2 h after switching on the current. This result is in accordance with that observed in cyclic voltammetry, in which the PPy growth commenced at 0.75 V vs. Ag/AgCl (curve 2 in Figure 1).

Moreover, the potential oscillated when 10.0 mA.cm-2 was applied. This result was associated with side reactions (overoxidation) that occur in the polymer matrix at higher potentials. The reactions that occured during the overoxidation process are represented below23,24 (Figure 3).


Previous results have shown that the formation of overoxidized films onto aluminum surfaces depend on the electrolyte (A-) nature.16 In citric acid medium the plateau potential for galvanostic deposition was 1.5 V vs Ag/AgCl resulting in the overoxidized film that was confirmed by the presence of carbonyl in the FTIR spectrum.

Bazzaoui et al. reported that the PPy eletrodeposited is overoxidized in saccharin aqueous medium at potential higher than 1V vs. Ag/AgCl 25.

3.2. Characterization of PPy films

The composition of PPy films electrodeposited in p-toluene sulfonic acid was analyzed by FTIR (Figure 4).


The presence of the absorption bands at: 1635 cm-1 (axial def. C=C); 1302 cm-1 (asymmetric axial def. O=S=O); and 1132 cm-1 (symmetric axial def. O=S=O) assigned in the spectrum of the PPy film (Figure 4a) suggested that the p-toluene sulfonic acid was incorporated into the polymer as a dopant.

Figure 5 shows the SEM micrographs of the aluminum surfaces coated with PPy films electrodeposited at 5.0 and 10.0 mA.cm-2 and at the same deposition charge of 9.0 × 104 C.m-2.


The films displayed a cauliflower-like structure of micro-spherical grains. This cauliflower structure is related to the dopant intercalation difficulty in the disordered polymeric chain26.

The micrographs also showed that the PPy films deposited at 10.0 mA.cm-2 had larger voids between the grains and were less homogeneous than those formed at 5.0 mA.cm-2. The morphological differences between the films can be explained by the overoxidation which results in the formation of pores and defects along the PPy chain.

3.3. Corrosion tests

The corrosion resistance of aluminum surfaces coated with PPy films was investigated in chloride containing medium.

Figure 6 shows potentiodynamic polarization curves at 5 mV/s, in a 0.1 mol.L-1 NaCl aqueous solution (not stirred, pH 5.9) for uncoated aluminum surfaces and for surfaces coated with PPy films electrodeposited at 5.0 and 10.0 mA.cm-2 and at the same deposition charge of 9.0 × 104 C.m-2.


The corrosion potential of the aluminum surfaces coated with polymeric films shifted to less negative values, and the anodic current densities of these surfaces were lower than those observed in the uncoated surfaces. The cathodic current densities, however, were higher for aluminum surfaces coated with PPy than for the uncoated surfaces. Breslin et al. also observed a higher rate of reduction reaction for aluminum electrode coated with a copolymer constituted of polypyrrole and polianiline electrodeposited in tosilyc acid medium than for uncoated electrode 27.

In the aerated solution, the main cathodic reactions were the reduction of oxygen and PPy, since the initial doped polymer structure could be cathodically reduced. The possible chemical reactions that occur on aluminum surfaces coated by PPy films during the polarization experiments are represented below. 28, 29

Anodic reactions

Cathodic reactions

Surfaces coated by films deposited at 5.0 mA.cm-2 presented higher cathodic current densities. A higher overoxidation degree of the PPy films formed at 10.0 mA.cm-2 would explain the lower cathodic current densities observed for that surface (curve 2 in Figure 6), since overoxidized films are less susceptible to reduction reaction during polarization experiments.

The electrochemical parameter values obtained from the polarization curves shown in Figure 6 are presented in Table 1.

The results presented in Table 1 indicate that the corrosion current densities of the aluminum surfaces coated with PPy films were higher than those for uncoated surfaces. The occurrence of redox reactions in the polymeric matrix can also contribute to increasing the corrosion current density.

However, considering the anodic current densities as criteria for determining the corrosion protection afforded by the PPy films, the PPy coated surfaces were less susceptible to corrosion processes than uncoated aluminum. Additionally, the PPy film deposited at 5.0 mA.cm-2 had better corrosion protection performance than films deposited at higher current densities. This result is ascribed to the greater homogeneity of this film (SEM micrographs).

The presence of larger voids in the cauliflower structure of the film deposited at higher current density allowed the penetration of chloride ions (aggressive species), which favored the corrosion process.

After the polarization experiment there were pits on the uncoated aluminum surface. The pitting potential was -0.48 V vs. Ag/AgCl in the curve 1 (Figure 6).

Moreover, the aluminum surfaces coated by PPy films deposited at 5.0 mA.cm-2 presented smaller amount of pits after polarization experiments in chloride medium than those coated by PPy deposited at 10.0 mA.cm-2. The greater porosity of overoxidized PPy films allowed the penetration of aggressive species, thereby promoting pits formation on aluminum surfaces.

4. Conclusion

After electrodepositing polypyrrole film from aqueous solution containing p-toluene sulfonic acid onto aluminum surface, the following conclusions can be described.

The morphology of the PPy films displayed a cauliflower-like structure comprise of micro-spherical grains, which is related to dopant intercalation in the polymeric chain. Furthermore, the FTIR spectra suggest that the p-toluene sulfonic acid was incorporated into the polymer as a dopant.

The films deposited at higher current density were more susceptible to the formation of pores and defects along the polymeric chain.

The corrosion potential of aluminum surfaces coated with polymeric films shifted to less negative values and the anodic current densities of these surfaces were lower than those observed for uncoated aluminum surfaces.

The corrosion current densities of the aluminum surfaces coated with PPy films were slightly higher than for uncoated surfaces. This can be attributed to the polymer dedoping reactions that may contribute to increasing the cathodic current densities, which explains the higher corrosion current values for PPy coated surfaces. Therefore, polymer films deposited at lower current density presented better corrosion performance.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP).

Received: August 13, 2009; Revised: November 22, 2009

  • 1. Jordão CP, Silva AC, Pereira JL and Brune W. Contaminação por crômio de águas de rios proveniente de curtumes em Minas Gerais. Química Nova. 1999; 22(1): 47-52.
  • 2. Ferreira ADQ. O Impacto do crômio nos sistemas biológicos. Química Nova. 2002; 25(4): 572-578.
  • 3. Sinko J. Challenges of chromate inhibitor pigments replacement in organic coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings 2001; 42(3-4): 267-282.
  • 4. Twite RL and Bierwagen GP. Review of alternatives to chromate for corrosion protection of aluminum aerospace alloys. Progress in Organic Coatings 1998; 33(2): 91-100.
  • 5. Huerta-Vilca D, Moraes SR and Motheo AJ. Anodic treatment of aluminum in nitric acid containing aniline, previous to deposition of polyaniline and its role on corrosion. Synthetic Metals 2004; 140(1): 23-27.
  • 6. Tallman DE, Sokins G, Dominis A and Wallace GG. Electroactive conducting polymers for corrosion control. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry. 2002; 6: 73-84.
  • 7. Maksymiuk K. Chemical Reactivity of Polypyrrole and Its Relevance to Polypyrrole Based Electrochemical Sensors. Electroanalysis. 2006; 18(16): 1537-1551.
  • 8. Wang LX, Li XG and Yang YL. Preparation, properties and applications of polypyrroles. Reactive and Functional Polymers. 2001; 47(2): 125-129.
  • 9. Wencheng S and Iroh JO. Effects of electrochemical process parameters on the synthesis and properties of polypyrrole coatings on steel. Synthetic Metals. 1998; 95(3): 159-167.
  • 10. Naoi K, Takeda M, Kanno H, Sakakura M and Shimada A. Simultaneous electrochemical formation of Al2O3/polypyrrole layers (I): effect of electrolyte anion in formation process. Electrochimica Acta. 2000; 45(20): 3413-3421.
  • 11. Skotheim TA and Reynolds JR. Handbook of conducting polymers. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: LLC CRC Press; 2007.
  • 12. Akundy GS and Iroh JO. Polypyrrole coatings on aluminum - synthesis and characterization. Polymer. 2001; 42(24): 9665-9669.
  • 13. Lehr IL and Saidman SB. Electrodeposition of polypyrrole on aluminium in the presence of sodium bis(2-ethylhexyl) sulfosuccinate. Materials Chemistry and Physics. 2006; 100(2-3): 262-267.
  • 14. Tallman DE, Dewald MP, Vang CK, Wallace GG and Bierwagen GP. Electrodeposition of conducting polymers on active metals by electron transfer mediation. Current Applied Physics 2004; 4(2-4): 137-140.
  • 15. Liu AS and Oliveira MAS. Electrodeposition of polypyrrole films on aluminum from tartrate aqueous solution. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society. 2007; 18(1): 143-152.
  • 16. Liu AS and Oliveira MAS. Corrosion control of aluminum surfaces by polypyrrole films: influence of electrolyte. Materials Research. 2007; 10(2): 205-209.
  • 17. Saidman SB and Bessone JB. Electrochemical preparation and characterisation of polypyrrole on aluminium in aqueous solution. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 2002; 521(1-2): 87-94.
  • 18. Arenas MA, Bajos LG, Damborenea JJ and Ocón P. Synthesis and electrochemical evaluation of polypyrrole coatings electrodeposited onto AA-2024 alloy. Progress in Organic Coatings 2008; 62(1): 79-86.
  • 19. Paloumpa I, Yfantis A, Hoffmann P, Burkov Y, Yfantis D and Schmeiber D. Mechanisms to inhibit corrosion of Al alloys by polymeric conversion coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology 2004; 180: 308-312.
  • 20. Sui J, Travas-Sejdic J, Chu SY, Li KC and Kilmartin PA. The actuation behavior and stability of p-toluene sulfonate doped polypyrrole films formed at different deposition current densities. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 111(2): 876-882.
  • 21. Wang PC and MacDiarmid AG. Dependency of properties of in situ deposited polypyrrole films on dopant anion and substrate surface. Synthetic Metals 2001; 119(1-3): 367-368.
  • 22. Gaur B and Srinivasan HS. Corrosion of metals and alloys in methane sulphonic acid. British Corrosion Journal. 1999; 34(1): 63-66.
  • 23. Mazeikien R and Malinauskas A. Kinetics of the electrochemical degradation of polypyrrole. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2002; 75(2): 255-258.
  • 24. Wencheng S and Iroh JO. Effects of electrochemical process parameters on the synthesis and properties of polypyrrole coatings on steel. Synthetic Metals. 1998; 95(3): 159-167.
  • 25. Bazzaoui M, Martins JI, Costa SC, Bazzaoui EA, Reis TC and Martins L. Sweet aqueous solution for electrochemical synthesis of polypyrrole: Part 1-A. On non-ferrous metals. Electrochimica Acta 2006; 51(12): 2417-2426.
  • 26. Bazzaoui M, Martins L, Bazzaoui EA and Martins JI. New single-step electrosynthesis process of homogeneous and strongly adherent polypyrrole films on iron electrodes in aqueous medium. Electrochimica Acta 47(18): 2953-2962.
  • 27. Breslin CB, Fenelon AM and ConroyKG. Surface engineering: corrosion protection using conducting polymers. Materials & Design. 2005; 26(3): 233-237.
  • 28. Martins NC, Silva TM, Montermor MF, Fernandes JCS and Ferreira MGS. Electrodeposition and characterization of polypyrrole films on aluminium alloy 6061-T6. Electrochimica Acta 2008; 53(14): 4754-4763.
  • 29. Ocon P, Cristobal AB, Herrasti P and Fatas E. Corrosion performance of conducting polymer coatings applied on mild steel. Corrosion Science 2005; 47(3): 649-662.
  • *
    e-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      19 Jan 2010
    • Date of issue
      2009

    History

    • Received
      13 Aug 2009
    • Accepted
      22 Nov 2009
    ABM, ABC, ABPol UFSCar - Dep. de Engenharia de Materiais, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235, 13565-905 - São Carlos - SP- Brasil. Tel (55 16) 3351-9487 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: pessan@ufscar.br