SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue3A new possible atomic arrangement for the carbon atom in the B-sites of AB-type carbonate apatiteMicrostructure development on sintered Ti/HA biocomposites produced by powder metallurgy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Materials Research

Print version ISSN 1516-1439

Mat. Res. vol.14 no.3 São Carlos July/Sept. 2011  Epub Aug 12, 2011

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392011005000051 

Purification of single-Wall carbon nanotubes by heat treatment and supercritical extraction

 

 

Mariana BertonciniI; Luiz Antonio Ferreira CoelhoI; Indhira Oliveira MacielII,III; Sérgio Henrique PezzinI, *

ICenter of Technological Sciences, Santa Catarina State University - UDESC,
Campus Universitário s/n, CEP 89223-100, Joinville, SC, Brazil
IIMaterials Department, National Institute of Metrology - INMETRO,
CEP 25250-020, Duque de Caxias, RJ, Brazil
IIIDepartment of Physics, Federal University of Juiz de Fora - UFJF,
Campus Universitário, CEP 36036-900, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Arc discharge is the most practical method for the synthesis of single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT). However, the production of SWCNT by this technique has low selectivity and yield, requiring further purification steps. This work is a study of purification of SWCNT by heat treatment in an inert atmosphere followed by supercritical fluid extraction. The raw arc discharge material was first heat-treated at 1250 °C under argon. The nanotubes were further submitted to an extraction process using supercritical CO2 as solvent. A surfactant (tributylphosphate, TBP) and a chelating agent (hexafluoroacetylacetone, HFA) were used together to eliminate metallic impurities from the remaining arc discharge catalysts. Analysis of Inductively Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) showed an efficient removal of iron and cobalt (>80%). The purified nanotubes were further analyzed by TGA and Raman spectroscopy.

Keywords: single-wall carbon nanotubes, purification, extraction, supercritical fluid


 

 

1. Introduction

Several techniques have been developed for carbon nanotube synthesis such as arc discharge, chemical vapour deposition (CVD) and laser ablation1-2. Arc discharge is the most practical method of single wall carbon nanotube (SWCNT) synthesis, producing nanotubes with fewer structural defects than those produced by low temperature techniques2. However, the production of SWCNT by this technique has, in general, low selectivity and yield, requiring further purification steps. The purification of carbon nanotubes (CNT) is becoming specific and, with the developments in synthesis methods, fewer residues are formed. Part of this evolution is linked to the addition of metal catalysts to improve the synthesis performance. Thus, the impurities in SWCNT typically are amorphous carbon and transition metals, like iron, nickel and cobalt, used as catalysts in the preparation and the growth of the CNT.

A variety of purification methods have been developed; however, removing impurities with high selectivity has been challenging3,4. Most of the purification methods involve gas phase oxidation at elevated temperatures (300-800 °C), or wet chemical oxidation with nitric acid, H2O2, or KMnO44. These aggressive processes can damage SWCNT severely3,5. Heating the metal impurities with microwaves or submitting CNT to metal-catalyzed oxidation have been also used to improve the carbon yield and purity3, but highly selective and environmentally friendly purification approaches have yet to be developed. For some applications of CNTs, such as their use as bio-materials, complete removal of metal particles is of particular importance. Therefore, a number of researchers have been investigating different forms to extract metals from CNT, including the use of supercritical fluid (SCF)6.

Despite the large number of studies on the behavior of organic compounds in supercritical fluids, there is little information about its use in the extraction of metals from aqueous media. The use of CO2 as SCF for the direct extraction is inefficient due to their weak interaction with the metal and, therefore, inability to neutralize its charge. The complexation with appropriate ligands seems a good solution, as the complexed metal ion have an increased solubility in supercritical CO2. The complexing agents must have high stability constants at low pH, high solubility in the SF and fast kinetics of complexation7.

The extraction of metal ions in the aqueous phase by chelating agents can occur by the formation of extractable complexes such as b-diketonates and organophosphates. Tributylphosphate (TBP), for example, has long been established for use as extractive ligand for metal ions8. Some combinations of two extraction agents can cause a large increase in the amount of metal extracted, acting synergistically9. Therefore, the use of two extractants (usually a surfactant and a chelating agent) in combination can potentially enhance the extraction of metals from CNT in an acidic media6.

To facilitate the process of extracting metals, it is interesting to add a purification step to expose carbon-enwrapped metal particles. Heat treatment until 1800 °C in inert atmosphere, for example, can change the structure of the CNT, eliminating defects, and can also assist in the removal of metals from catalysts10.

In this work the purification of SWCNT by heat treatment in an inert atmosphere followed by extraction of metals in supercritical CO2, assisted by TBP and HFA, has been studied. The nanotubes were characterized before and after purification by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Raman spectroscopy.

 

2. Materials and Methods

Single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) used in this study were purchased from the Laboratory of Nanomaterials - Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG, Brazil). These nanotubes were produced by the method of electric arc discharge and had a purity level of 40% (amorphous carbon, Co, Ni and Fe as main impurities).

65% nitric acid (Merck), tributylphosphate (TBP) PA (Sigma Aldrich) and hexafluoroacetylacetone (HFA) PA (Sigma Aldrich) were used as received. CO2 (Air Liquid) with a minimum purity of 99.9999% was used as supercritical fluid.

2.1. Heat treatment

SWCNT were placed in a porcelain container and heated up to 1250 °C at 10 °C/min in a TCR 50 sintering furnace with MicroCOR III controller (Adamel Lhomargy). The system was maintained at 1250 °C for 4 hours and then cooled at 10 °C/min to room temperature. The material was carefully weighed and characterized by TGA and Raman spectroscopy.

2.2. Supercritical fluid apparatus

In this work, we studied static and dynamic extraction of metals from SWCNT, with the aid of TBP and HFA as complexing agents. Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the apparatus assembled and used for carrying out the procedures cited in this article. The equipment consists of a stainless steel high-pressure cell with a variable volume (1); a magnetic stirrer, IKA (2); a thermostatic water bath, Cientec CT 281 (3); a jacketed high pressure syringe-type pump, ISCO 500D (4), a thermostatic jacket for the high pressure cell with a Switron RWMC-7 temperature controller (5); a light source (6); a piston to control the cell volume (7); side (8) and frontal (9) sapphire windows; a pressure transducer, SMAR 400D LD (10); a fraction collector (11) and a CO2 cylinder (12).

 

 

2.3. Extraction of metals

Initially, 5 mL of TBP were mixed with 5 mL nitric acid in a test tube with lid, and stirred for 4 minutes to produce the CO2-soluble TBP-(HNO3)1.8(H2O)0.6 complex6. The system was then allowed to rest until there was a phase separation. Three mL of the supernatant were then withdrawn and transferred to a 10 mL beaker. 0.01 g of previously heat-treated single-wall nanotubes were added to the TBP HNO3 system and sonicated for 10 minutes at 150 W. This mixture was transferred to the cell of the supercritical fluid equipment and 0.2 ml of HFA was added to the system. The cell was closed, heated to 60 ± 1 °C, and then filled with 25 mL of CO2 at 200 bar and 5 ± 1 °C. The system was maintained under magnetic stirring at this pressure and temperature of 60 ± 1 °C for 1.5 hours. The system was then slowly depressurized with the aid of a micrometer needle valve (Autoclave Engineers, 10VRMM2812) for 1 hour. At the end of the procedure, the cell was cooled down to room temperature and the SWCNT were flushed out of the cell with deionized water (type 2). The extracted nanotubes were filtered using a PVDF filter (PALL, pore size of 0.45 µm), washed with deionized water, and dried at 80 °C for 24 hours. The material was then carefully weighed and characterized by Raman, TG and ICP-AES.

2.4. Characterization

For Raman measurements a Jobin Yvon T64000 triple spectrometer was used in backscattering configuration, with a 514.5 nm excitation laser wavelength. SWCNT samples were analyzed in at least four different points in the range from 100 to 300 cm-1 and 1200 to 1750 cm-1. Quantitative analysis of metals was performed using an inductively coupled plasma - atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES), iCAP 6000 (Thermo Scientific). Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were performed on a Netzsch STA 449C equipment starting from the ambient temperature to 650 °C at 10 °C/min in oxidizing atmosphere (synthetic air).

 

3. Results and Discussion

The Raman spectra of nanotube samples before treatment, after heat treatment and after the supercritical fluid extraction of metals are shown in Figure 2 (Radial Breathing Mode, RBM, 100-300 cm-1) and Figure 3 (D and G bands, 1250-1750 cm-1). The position of the RBM peaks and the G band feature confirm the presence of SWCNT and shows that the nanotubes are mostly semiconductors11. RBM peaks are characteristic of single wall carbon nanotubes and can be used to estimate SWCNT diameter by considering their position in the spectra (Figure 2)12. For the studied pristine sample the diameter value was estimated as 1.22 ± 0.02 nm.

 

 

 

 

Raman spectra of all carbon materials exhibit characteristic peaks in the region between 1000 and 1800 cm-1 for excitation energy in the visible and infrared. For graphitic materials, this region is related to the D, G and D' bands, where the G band (1500-1600 cm-1) is a first order mode with E2g symmetry and the D (1200-1400 cm-1) and D' (1600-1630 cm-1) bands arise due to double resonance Raman processes13. Analyses of the Raman spectra show no significant change between the ratios of the peak areas of the G and D bands, as it is shown in Table 1. These results confirm that the structure of SWCNT was practically unchanged after heat treatment and metal extraction. Nevertheless, the spectra indicate a large amount of amorphous carbon in the samples, as denoted by the size of the D bands. The absence of D' band at ca. 1620 cm-1 shows that the material does not contain multiwall carbon nanotubes14.

 

 

The removal of metals from CNT is a difficult task and very hard to achieve only by wet techniques, such as acid washing, because most of the metal particles are enwrapped by carbon layers. Heat treatment at high temperatures (>1200 °C) under inert atmosphere could, at the same time, partially remove metals by vaporization and change the structure of CNT, removing structural defects and, consequently, increasing mechanical strength, thermal stability and electronic transport, for example4. Thermal annealing can also assist in the removal of metals from catalysts by unwrapping metal particles10. However, carbonaceous impurities are still present after treatment and become more difficult to remove after graphitization15. This was observed in this work, as Raman spectra have shown the same profile before and after heat treatment.

Quantitative analysis of metals by ICP-AES showed that untreated SWCNT contained 0.98% iron, 0.35% nickel and 0.88% cobalt. After heat treatment and extraction process the quantities decreased to 0.16% iron (removal of 84% of the initial metal amount), 0.32% nickel (removal of 8.6%) and 0.16% cobalt (removal of 82%). The results prove the efficiency of the purification process for iron and cobalt, which forms strong complexes with b-diketone chelating agents in supercritical CO26,16. However, the fluorinated b-diketone (HFA) was not efficient to form nickel chelates. Considering the literature, better results for nickel removal could be probably achieved with dithiocarbamates17.

In the TGA curves (Figure 4), recorded under oxidizing atmosphere, it is observed that the onset temperature of oxidation was lower than 400 °C for pristine and heat-treated samples. In contrast, after the extraction of metals, the temperature of initiation of degradation was considerably higher than 400 °C, showing that the presence of metal catalysts influences the oxidation temperature of CNT. It is also verified that, at 650 °C, the residual mass for pristine (untreated) samples was 12% of the initial mass. The residual mass at 650 °C decreases to 9% of the initial mass for heat-treated samples and for heat-treated samples after supercritical extraction.

 

 

4. Conclusions

The extraction of metals using supercritical carbon dioxide combined with a pre-heat treatment under argon was effective to remove iron and cobalt from SWCNT. Raman spectroscopy suggests that the structure of the SWCNT remains intact after the purification procedure, avoiding structure damage that may result from acid treatments. Thermogravimetric analyses show that the presence of metals influence the initial temperature of oxidation of carbonaceous samples containing SWCNT.

Thus, it can be said that the heat treatment and the supercritical extraction were effective in removing some metallic impurities (namely Fe and Co), but it was not able to remove carbonaceous impurities to a considerable extent.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CAPES, CNPq, AEB and PGCEM-UDESC for financial and structural support.

 

References

1. Harris PJF. Carbon Nanotube Science: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609701        [ Links ]

2. Keidar M. Factors affecting synthesis of single wall carbon nanotubes in arc discharge. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2007; 40:2388-2393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/8/S18        [ Links ]

3. Wang Y, Shan H, Hauge RH, Pasquali M and Smalley RE. A Highly Selective, One-Pot Purification Method for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2007;111(6):1249-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp068229+        [ Links ]

4. Hou PX, Liu C and Cheng HM. Purification of carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 2008; 46(15):2003-2025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.09.009        [ Links ]

5. Hu H, Zhao B, Itkis ME and Haddon RC. Nitric Acid Purification of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2003; 107(50):13838-13842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp035719i        [ Links ]

6. Wang JS, Wai Cm, Shimizu K, Cheng F, Boeckl Jj, Maruyama B et al. Purification of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Using a Supercritical Fluid Extraction Method. Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2007; 111(35):13007-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp073374o        [ Links ]

7. Chen J, Shan JY, Tsukada T, Munekane F, Kuno A, Matsuo M et al. The structural evolution of thin multi-walled carbon nanotubes during isothermal annealing. Carbon. 2007; 45:274-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.028        [ Links ]

8. Wai CM and Wang SF. Supercritical fluid extraction: metals as complexes. Journal of Chromatography A. 1997; 785(1-2):369-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(97)00679-1        [ Links ]

9. Almeida VF. Separação de actinídeos utilizando-se calixarenos como agentes extratores. [Dissertação]. São Paulo: Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares; 2001.         [ Links ]

10. Rao A, Kumar P and Ramakumar KL. Separation of uranium from different uranium oxide matrices employing supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2010; 285:247-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10967-010-0568-7        [ Links ]

11. Kataura H, Kumazawa Y, Maniwa Y, Umezu I, Suzuki V, Ohtsuka Y et al. Optical properties of single-wall carbon nanotubes. Synthetic Metals. 1999; 103:2555-2558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0379-6779(98)00278-1        [ Links ]

12. Jorio A, Pimenta MA, Souza Filho AG, Saito R, Dresselhaus G and Dresselhaus MS. Characterizing carbon nanotube samples with resonance Raman scattering. New Journal of Physics. 2003; 5:139.1-139.17.         [ Links ]

13. Lobo AO, Martin AA, Antunes EF, Trava-Airoldi VJ and Corat EJ. Caracterização de Materiais Carbonosos por Espectroscopia Raman. Revista Brasileira de Aplicações de Vácuo. 2005; 24:98-103.         [ Links ]

14. Strong KL, Anderson DP, Lafdi K and Kuhn JN. Purification process for single-wall carbon nanotubes. Carbon. 2003; 41(8):1477-1488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00014-9        [ Links ]

15. Andrews R, Jacques D, Qian D and Dickey EC. Purification and structural annealing of multiwalled carbon nanotubes at graphitization temperatures. Carbon. 2001; 39:1681-1687.         [ Links ]

16. Wang JS and Wai CM. Dissolution of Precious Metals in Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2005; 44:922-926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie040198m        [ Links ]

17. Ashraf-Khorassani M, Combs MT and Taylor LT. Solubility of metal chelates and their extraction from an aqueous environment via supercritical CO2. Talanta. 1997; 44(5):755-763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-9140(96)02075-9        [ Links ]

 

 

Received: March 21, 2011; Revised: July 8, 2011

 

 

* e-mail: pezzin@joinville.udesc.br

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License