SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue4Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and ultimate tensile strength of thixoformed AM60B magnesium alloy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Materials Research

Print version ISSN 1516-1439

Mat. Res. vol.15 no.4 São Carlos July/Aug. 2012 Epub July 31, 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392012005000085 

Thermoplastic polyurethane synthesis using POSS as a chain modifier

 

 

Gabriel Hoyer LopesI; Janaína JungesI, *; Rudinei FiorioII; Mara ZeniI; Ademir José ZatteraI

ILaboratory of Polymers - LPOL, Center of Exact Sciences and Technology - CCET, Caxias do Sul University - UCS, Rua Francisco Getúlio Vargas, 1130, Bairro Petrópolis, CEP 95070-560, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil
IIFederal Institute for Education, Science and Technology, Rua Mário de Boni, 2250, Bairro Floresta, CEP 95012-580, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

In this study, thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs) were synthesized using the one-shot process in solution. To obtain the samples n-phenylaminopropyl polyhedric oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) was added as a chain modifier during the synthesis in four different amounts. The samples were characterized by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and capillary rheometry. FTIR confirm the TPU attainment due the absence of the band at ~2253 cm-1 suggesting a complete conversion of the isocyanate terminations. The TGA showed that incorporation of POSS decreased the rate of mass loss of TPU under isothermal conditions. The flexible phase showed an enhanced stability to temperature, probably due to increased phase separation between the rigid and flexible domains. The DSC showed that incorporation of 0.4 wt. (%) of POSS increased the glass transition temperature of the flexible phase. Moreover, addition of POSS modified the melting behaviour, providing samples with a higher melting enthalpy compared to neat TPU as a consequence of the formation of larger crystals. The capillary rheometry analysis revels that the POSS addition showed a clear tendency toward higher intrinsic viscosities as the amount of POSS was increased.

Keywords: thermoplastic polyurethane, POSS, FTIR, thermal stability, DSC, capillary rheometry


 

 

1. Introduction

With a wide variety of applications, the chemical versatility of polyurethanes (PUs) has led to a new class of high performance materials for use as paints and varnishes, adhesives, resins, fibers, elastomers, etc.1,2.

The building blocks used to obtain PUs, both thermoplastics and thermosets, are diisocyanates and polyisocyanates, as well as compounds with a broad array of molar masses containing two or more hydroxyl groups. The isocyanate (-N=C=O) and hydroxyl (-OH) groups react forming the urethane group3,4. The thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPUs) were the first thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) to be discovered, and one of the most important of this class of materials. The TPEs possess a different structure and morphology compared to thermoset elastomers, often lacking the usual crosslinkings created by the addition of curing agents. TPUs show distinct microphases: the flexible domains, which are generally amorphous, have a glass transition temperature (Tg) below room temperature and are responsible for the properties being similar to those of the normal elastomers; and rigid domains, segments that act as physical crosslinks, with a relatively high Tg5,6. The rigid segment is thermally labile, allowing the material to be processed through the techniques normally applied to other thermoplastics4,7,8.

The TPU properties are the result from the combination of the rigid and flexible domain, consisting of coiled long polymeric chains, which are also present in the structure of conventional elastomers, the segment orientation, the amount of hydrogen bonds and other intermolecular interactions9.

As a disadvantage, the TPUs show considerable susceptibility to thermal and thermo-oxidative degradation over the temperature range required to process the material10. The urethane group has a low thermal stability, due to its reversible dissociation into isocyanate and alcohol at temperatures around 150-200 °C[11,12].

The urethane group dissociation causes a fast decrease in the polymer molar mass, modifying the viscosity, crystallization behavior and even mechanical properties, during controlled analysis or common methods of processing in the melt state12. The thermal stability of the urethane group is dependent on the nature of the polyol chain, the chain extender and the isocyanate used. Several attempts to enhance the urethane group stability have been reported, through the addition of thermally stable isocyanates, alcohols and chain extenders5. Such modifications change the system processability, and sometimes the low temperature properties.

In this study, a polyhedric oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) is proposed as a stabilizing agent considering the thermal properties of the urethane group13,14. The POSS structure was first reported in 1946. However, it has recently received greater attention due to its unique structure. It is formed of a cage-shaped inorganic nucleus, usually closed, comprising silicon and oxygen atoms. In monomer form, POSS molecules crystallize as spheres within a rhombohedral (or hexagonal) lattice with well-defined melting points that depend on the vertex group. Commonly, such vertex groups are linear or cyclic aliphatic molecules, engendering strong hydrophobicity to the POSS molecule. Depending on their compatibility with the polymer matrix, POSS moieties can either disperse nearly within a molecular level or aggregate into nanoscale domains13. The average size of the nucleus is 1.5 nm, and it is surrounded by functional organic groups. The POSS nanoscopic size allows reinforcement of the polymeric segments in which it is included, controlling the chain mobility at the molecular level15. These effects are related to the surface area and chemical interactions imposed by the nanoreinforcement of the polymeric chain, and its effect is analogous to the macroscopic reinforcement obtained by the addition of fibers to a polymeric matrix in composite structures16,17. The unique characteristics of POSS make it a promising reagent in the attempt to thermally stabilize the urethane group and to evaluate the resulting thermal properties1.

In this way, the literature lacks works on the influence of POSS on the thermal stability of TPU nanocomposites. So, this work focus in evaluate the thermal stability, thermal resistance and the glass transition values of neat TPU and TPU with addition of POSS in amounts of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6% in weight. On the other hand, FTIR was used to confirm if the synthesis process was a reaction completely effective. Also, the capillary rheometry was used to evaluated the nanocomposites rheological behaviour at higher shear rates.

 

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials

The materials used were a 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) based pre-polymer (Urecon 185, Coim, with 18% free -N=C=O), hydroquinone bis-(2-hydroxyethyl)ether (HQEE, Sigma-Aldrich, 98%), n-phenylaminopropyl-polyhedric oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS, Hybrid Plastics) and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK, Lafan Química Fina, P.A.) as a solvent. The MEK was dried using a molecular sieve. All other reagents were used as supplied.

2.2. TPU Synthesis

The synthesis of the polymer with POSS incorporated into the main chain was carried out in a one-shot process, in a solution of MEK, in an open system with a constant flow of nitrogen. The nitrogen was previously saturated with MEK vapor, and the system was mechanically stirred at 90 rpm. The nitrogen flow was set at 50 mL/min, and the reaction was carried out for 120 minutes. The stoichiometry was set to maintain an NCO index around 98%, according to the Equation 1 below.

The material obtained was removed from the reactor and transferred to a single joint glass container, connected to a spiral condenser. This system was maintained under heating for 22 hours in an oil bath for post-curing. The resulting samples were separated from the solvent through vacuum filtration and dried in a vacuum oven for 72 hours. Neat TPU and TPUs samples with 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6% by weight of POSS were obtained in triplicate.

2.3. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy (ATR)

The Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis was carried on a Nicolet Impact 400 spectrometer, with a scanning range of between 400 and 4000 cm-1. The TPUs obtained were scanned in solid dust form, previously dried at 70 °C in an air circulation oven for 48 hours. Samples were compressed in order to obtain maximum contact, yielding surface spectra.

2.4. Thermal analysis

Thermal analysis (Shimadzu, TGA50) were carried out in triplicate under nitrogen atmosphere, with a flow rate of 50 mL/min. Samples had an approximate mass of 10 mg. The heating rate used was 10 °C/min and the temperature range was 25 to 810 °C.

Using the same equipment mentioned above, samples of around 10 mg were quickly heated (40 °C/min) to temperatures of 210, 230, 260 and 280 °C, and keep at each temperature for 60 minutes.

2.5. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

Samples with an average mass of 10 mg were analyzed in triplicate with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, Shimadzu, DSC60), contained in hermetically sealed aluminum pans. The analysis was carried under nitrogen atmosphere, with a flow rate of 50 mL/min, over a temperature range from - 50 to 270 °C.

2.6. Capillary rheometry

The capillary rheometry analysis (Galaxy III 9052, Kayeness) was carried according to the ASTM D3895-96[18], at the temperature of 230 °C, using a capillary with L/D = 20. The pre-determined shear rates were approximately 100, 200, 300, 500 and 700 /s. The preset values were corrected using the Rabinowitsch correction19.

 

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy (ATR)

The Figure 1 showed the FTIR spectra for the neat reagents, also they chemical structure and the most important groups on MDI, HQEE and POSS reagents. The Figure 1a of the pre-polymer presents in detail a strong band at approximately 2253 cm-1 assigned to NCO groups1,13. Figure 1b showed the prominent band at about 3500-3000 cm-1 assigned to OH groups, and CH2 and CH3 stretching bands at 2930-2869 cm-1 characteristic of the HQEE structure20. Figure 1c shows the band at 3300 cm-1 ascribed to NH groups and stretching of CH(Ar) from aromatic groups in 3040 cm-1 both assigned to n-phenylaminopropyl radical structure. Also, the characteristics POSS bands Si-O and Si-O-R appears in the range between 1400-1000 cm-1[13].

 



 

The Figure 2 presents the four samples synthesized. Initially the spectra of the four samples in Figure 2 were compared with the reagents spectra in Figure 1. The different TPUs, regardless of the amount of POSS added to the formulation, showed very similar spectra. The Figure 2 showed the prominent band at about 3400-3200 cm-1 assigned to OH groups. As an expected consequence, unreacted hydroxyl and secondary amines, as well as the N-H group present in the urethane and urea, were detected as a single peak in the same region. As the characteristic peaks of each above-mentioned group are all present in the same general region, the spectra shows a single peak with medium intensity and a large area. The aforementioned groups are present at the polymer chain ends, and at the end of the organic functions attached to the POSS nuclei20,21. The absorption peak observed between 3043-3041 cm-1 is associated with the presence of aromatic rings in the MDI, HQEE and organic terminations of the POSS (Figure 1). Peaks immediately below the 3000 cm-1 region show the presence of C-H bonds, confirmed in the region of 1455-1414 cm-1[15].

 

 

The characteristic N=C=O peak at approximately 2253 cm-1 was absent in Figure 2, suggesting a complete conversion of the isocyanate terminations presents on MDI reagent in Figure 1a into urethane and urea groups. This is an indicative of completely reaction as showed on the detail region in Figure 1a and Figure 2[13]. Because of the excellent compatibility of POSS in TPU, when the POSS content was overdue, all the NCO groups would react with POSS1.

The absorption at 1732-1703 cm-1 is associated with the C=O groups in free urethanes20, which are present in the urethane groups, and also ester groups present in the polyol chains of the pre-polymer. Absorption at 1595 cm-1 is also characteristic of the above-mentioned aromatic groups. Further evidence of the presence of N-H groups is detected through peaks in the 1532-1508 cm-1 region, consistent with the expected formation of urethane groups and the presence of associated secondary amines from the organic groups attached to the POSS nuclei20,21. Peaks situated at 1310-1308 cm-1 correspond to the C-O group present in esters and those in the range of 1238-1223 cm-1 are related to three different groups, these being aliphatic C-N, aromatic C-N and C-O in ethers. As all three groups are present in the formulation, overlapping of the above-mentioned peaks is likely to occur20.

The Si-O and Si-O-R groups, with a characteristic peak in the 1100-1000 cm-1 region13,21-22, cannot be distinguished from the esther groups detected at 1124-1070 cm-1. Such groups are present in the polyol component of the pre-polymer, and the small amount of POSS in the formulation probably cannot be detected due to overlapping of the ether group peaks. Observation of the absorption characteristics below 1000 cm-1 is used to characterize the position of substitution of the aromatic rings dispersed in the polymer chain of the synthesized TPU20, where at ~829 cm-1 the p-substituted aromatic rings, present from the MDI and HQEE, are detected; and the peaks at 770-747 cm-1 are characteristic of the mono-substituted aromatic rings of the n-phenyl groups of the POSS21. Based on the FTIR results, the development synthesized process shows to be an attractive method to obtain TPU/POSS nanocomposites without traces of unreacted NCO groups.

3.2. Thermal stability

For the synthesized TPUs, samples decomposed mainly in two steps. The first step could be attributed to the degradation of the hard or rigid domains of the TPU, and is commonly related to urethane break bonds, occurring between 250-350 °C. The second step could be related to the degradation of the elastic or flexible segments, and this event is situated in the range of 350-500 °C[1,23]. By increasing the POSS content, a shift to higher temperatures, for the first and the second range of degradation, can be noted in Table 1 despite the relatively small amount of POSS added.

 

 

According to Liu et al.24, the higher thermal stability of the TPU/POSS nanocomposites may be associated with an arrangement of interconnected structures involving the polymer matrix and POSS cages, promotes a significant effect on the TPU rigid domain. As showed in the Table 1, the peak temperature increases from 333.9 ± 0.1 to 352.1 ± 1.8. The increase in the thermal stability is related also to the barrier effect caused by the formation of inert silicate layers that can act as a heat transfer barrier, since POSS is an inorganic material and has lower thermal conductivity than the regular carbon segments25. In addition POSS tends to crystallize in two dimensions in a format of lamellar structures26.

There are significant changes in the on set and peak temperatures of the flexible domain, as well. As showed in Table 1, the peak temperatures for TPU/POSS samples improve approximately 13 °C when compared with neat TPU. These results may be due to the presence of urea groups, formed by the reaction with the secondary amine group attached to the POSS nuclei. The urea group, as well as the urethane group and the POSS, are highly polar, and thus it is difficult to separate each exact degradation temperature due to possible overlapping of each degradation phenomenon. The POSS can also induce a higher phase separation21, causing changes in the degradation mechanism of the flexible domain. These improvements are associated with the increase in the POSS ramification flexibility as well a reduction in the average crosslink density24,27-28. Also the resulting properties are dependent on the reactivity of the functional groups present in the nanocages29.

3.3. Thermal resistance

According to the data obtained from the curves (Figure 3 and Table 2), the measured mass losses were slightly lower in the TPUs with POSS additions. The 0.4% POSS presented the lowest mass loss at all temperatures, except at 260 °C, probably due to a lower molar mass in that specific sample. Further addition of POSS yielded polymers with slightly higher mass loss. The change in behavior can be explained by the addition of urea groups, through the reaction of isocyanates with the secondary amine groups present in the POSS. Urea groups are more stable than urethane groups, leading to an increase in thermal resistance20.

 

 

 

 

These could be attributed to the consolidation effects which could be interpreted on the following two factors. (1) The TPU chain movement may was restricted by the increasing crosslinking density of materials as POSS content increased. (2) When POSS content was low, TPU/POSS nanocomposites exhibited rubberlike properties because of the main part of the composite was soft segments1.

3.4. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)

The DSC heating traces for all of our samples, while glass transition temperatures, melting points, and latent heats of melting are summarized in Table 3. The average melting temperature (Tm) was significantly higher for the obtained TPUs, comparing polymers using 1,4-buthanediol (BDO) as a short chain extender23,30. Comparing the different formulations, melting temperatures does not show significant changes with the addition of POSS. According to the Flory-Huggins theory31, a melting temperature increase indicates a comparably unfavorable interaction between components, in this case, the TPU and POSS. Considering this theory, the addition of POSS drives stronger phase separation of the TPU hard segment from the amorphous phase in POSS TPUs, leading to enhanced POSS crystallization15.

 

 

The melting enthalpy showed appreciable changes only for TPUs with 0.4% addition of POSS; the glass transition temperature of flexible phase (Tg-f) values consequently being higher due to the lower chain mobility. These findings indicate changes in the amount of crystal and the size of such structures sizes, where even relatively small amounts of POSS interfere with the polymer chain interactions. The non-linear behavior may be due to crosslinking occurring in the TPU during the synthesis, which can be induced by the presence of moisture remaining in the system, as well as the amount of functional groups attached to the POSS nuclei (eight secondary amine groups per POSS molecule).

Xu et al.32,33 investigated the Tg enhancement mechanism of POSS-based hybrid polymers employing FTIR spectra and reported that a strong interaction between POSS siloxane and the polar carbonyl group contributes to a significant Tg increase. In good agreement with their observations, we also found that, for instance, the FTIR spectrum of TPU/POSS exhibited peaks at 1310-1070 cm-1 (Figure 2). In our case, the polar groups, which induce the dipole-dipole interaction with POSS siloxane, could be the carbonyl group and/or ether group of the TPU backbone. Because of the microphase-separated microstructure, this dipole-dipole interaction might mainly take place at the interface between the POSS and the TPU. This increase in Tg with POSS loading, despite the microphase-separated microstructure, indicates an interfacial effect where in the rigid POSS phase decreases segmental flexibility of the adjacent TPU phase, leading to the Tg enhancement13. The exception of 0.4% POSS may be due to the high crystallinity of TPU domains for that sample. In addition, as POSS loadings increased, the crosslinking density of TPU/POSS network increased and the free volumes of the network decreased rapidly, thus the Tg of the network increased1.

3.5. Capillary rheometry

While rheology is not the focus of the present paper, it is well know that changes in the thermal behavior reflect in rheological properties of dispersions systems such as the present TPU/POSS34. The addition of POSS showed a clear tendency toward higher intrinsic viscosities as the amount of the above-mentioned chain modifier was increased. Samples tended toward a linear pseudoplastic behaviour, with a higher amount of POSS leading to higher intrinsic viscosities at all shear rates evaluated. The incorporation of POSS into the TPU backbone produced a significant change in the viscosity. The viscosity increases linearly with POSS, corroborating the reinforcing efficiency of POSS in the TPU backbone. The viscosity strongly depends on frequency (Figure 4), revealing the non-Newtonian behavior of TPU/POSS composites in which the viscosity at low frequencies is significantly higher than that obtained at high frequencies34.

 

 

The POSS restraint the movement of flexible domain probably by the formation of silicate layers, and as consequence the viscosity increase. Similar behaviour was also found by Nanda et al.34 in Polyurethane/POSS Hybrid system. On the other hand, the inert silicate layers may act as a heat transfer barrier, and the thermal properties can also improved24,25, as can be seen in Table 1 and Table 2. Other functional groups could be formed from the isocyanate, such as the isocyanurate, which have a higher thermal stability than urethane groups23. However, such groups can lead to the formation of ramifications and possible crosslinking in the polymer chain. The DSC analysis did not show evidence of this behaviour, considering that the Tm remained roughly the same for all samples, and no significant decrease in the melting enthalpy was observed, although some degree of crosslinking and ramification would be expected, due to the amount of functional groups attached to the POSS nuclei.

 

4. Conclusions

TPUs were successfully synthesized from the proposed reagents, with an apparent incorporation of POSS in the main polymer chain due the absent of the band at 2253 cm-1 assigned to NCO groups. Based on the FTIR results, the development synthesized process shows to be an attractive method to obtain TPU/POSS nanocomposites.

The insertion of POSS on TPU backbone increased the thermal stability of the rigid and flexible domain. The thermal resistance also improved with POSS addition, resulting in comparatively lower mass loss during isothermal TGA. The improve in both thermal properties may be related to the barrier effect caused by the formation of inert silicate layers that can act as a heat transfer barriers, in addition POSS is an inorganic material and has lower thermal conductivity than the regular carbon segments from the polymer matrix. On the other hand, the DSC analysis showed an increase in Tg of flexible and rigid domains with POSS loading, has a result of restricts imposed to the movement of TPU chain segments. Moreover, the viscosity also increase due the restricts imposed by POSS to polymer segments.

In general, the modifications in the thermal properties of TPUs are probably influenced by an increased phase separation imposed by the volume of the POSS nuclei, formation of inert silicate layers, restriction of the chain mobility due the POSS addition, as well as the degree of crosslinking, and probably by the presence of more thermally stable urea groups.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), the Research Funding Foundation of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) for financing the project, and the University of Caxias do Sul (UCS).

 

References

1. Zhang Q, He H, Xi K, Huang X, Yu X and Jia X. Synthesis of N-Phenylaminomethyl POSS and Its Utilization in Polyurethane. Macromolecules. 2011; 44:550-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma101825j        [ Links ]

2. Holden G, Legge NR, Quirk R and Schroeder HE. Thermoplastic Elastomers. Munich: Hanser; 1996.         [ Links ]

3. Lu QW, Hernandez-Hernandez ME and Macosko CW. Explaining the abnormally high flow activation energy of thermoplastic polyurethanes. Polymer. 2003; 44:3309-3318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00223-4        [ Links ]

4. Pompe G, Pohlers A, Pötsche P and Piontek J. Influence of processing conditions on the multiphase structure of segmented polyurethane. Polymer. 1998; 39:5147-5153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(97)10350-0        [ Links ]

5. Oertel G. Polyurethane Handbook. New York: Hanser; 1993.         [ Links ]

6. Howard GT. Biodegradation of polyurethane: a review. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 2002; 49:245-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00051-3        [ Links ]

7. Lu QW and Macosko CW. Comparing the compatibility of various functionalized polypropylenes with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Polymer. 2004; 45:1981-1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.077        [ Links ]

8. Li S, Tang X, Luo Y and Xu X. The study of a thermoplastic polyurethane ionomer system. European Polymer Journal. 1998; 34:1899-1902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(98)00027-5        [ Links ]

9. Yeganeh H and Shamekhi MA. Poly(urethane-imide-imide), a new generation of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers with enhanced thermal stability. Polymer. 2004; 45:359-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2003.11.006        [ Links ]

10. Finnigan B, Martin D, Halley P, Truss R and Campbell K. Morphology and properties of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites incorporating hydrophilic layered silicates. Polymer. 2004; 45:2249-2260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.049        [ Links ]

11. Nair PR, Nair CPR and Francis DJ. Phosphazene-modified polyurethanes: Synthesis, mechanical and thermal characteristics. European Polymer Journal, 1996; 32:1415-1420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-3057(96)00079-1        [ Links ]

12. Hentschell T and Münsted H. Kinetics of the molar mass decrease in a polyurethane melt: a rheological study. Polymer. 2001; 42:3195-3203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(00)00489-4        [ Links ]

13. Wu J, Ge Q and Mather PT. PEG-POSS Multiblock Polyurethanes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Hydrogel Formation. Macromolecules. 2010; 43:7637-7649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma101336c        [ Links ]

14. Janowski B and Pielichowski K. Thermo(oxidative) stability of novel polyurethane/POSS nanohybrid elastomers. Thermochimica Acta. 2008; 478:51-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2008.08.015        [ Links ]

15. Guo Q, Knight PT, Wu J and Mather PT. Blends of Paclitaxel with POSS-Based Biodegradable Polyurethanes: Morphology, Miscibility, and Specific Interactions. Macromolecules. 2010; 43:4991-4999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma100662x        [ Links ]

16. Bourbigot S, Turf T, Bellayer S and Duquesne S. Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane as flame retardant for thermoplastic polyurethane. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2009; 94:1230-1237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.04.016        [ Links ]

17. Seymour RW and Cooper SL. Thermal Analysis of Polyurethane Block Polymers. Macromolecules. 1973; 6:48-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma60031a008        [ Links ]

18. American Society for Testing and Materials - ASTM. ASTM D3895: Standart test method for determination of properties of polymeric materials by means of a capillary rheometer. ASTM; 1996.         [ Links ]

19. Bretas RES and D'Avila MA. Melts Polymer Rheology. São Carlos: EdUFSCar; 2000.         [ Links ]

20. Silverstein M and Webster FX. Spectrometric identification of organic compunds. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara; 1979.         [ Links ]

21. Chattopadhyay DK and Webster DC. Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Progress in Polymer Science. 2009; 34:1068-1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.06.002        [ Links ]

22. Schuur M, Noordover B and Gaymans RJ. Polyurethane elastomers with amide chain extenders of uniform length. Polymer. 2006; 47:1091-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.074        [ Links ]

23. Herrera M, Matuschek G and Kettrup A. Thermal degradation of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers (TPU) based on MDI. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2002; 78:323-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00181-7        [ Links ]

24. Liu Y, Zheng S and Nie K. Epoxy nanocomposites with octa(propylglycidyl ether) polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. Polymer. 2005; 46:12016-12025. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2005.09.056        [ Links ]

25. Zhang Z, Gu A, Liang G, Ren P, Xie J and Wang X. Thermo-oxygen degradation mechanisms of POSS/epoxy nanocomposites. Polymer Degradation and Stability. 2007; 92:1986-1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.08.004        [ Links ]

26. Zheng L, Hong S and Cardoen G. Polymer Nanocomposites through Controlled Self-Assembly of Cubic Silsesquioxane Scaffolds. Macromolecules. 2004; 37:8606-8611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma048557c        [ Links ]

27. Pellice SA, Fasce DP and Williams RJJ. Properties of epoxy networks derived from the reaction of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes bearing OH-functionalized organic substituents. Polymer Physics. 2003; 41:1451-1461. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/polb.10494        [ Links ]

28. Ni Y, Zhang S and Nie K. Morphology and thermal properties of inorganic-organic hybrids involving epoxy resin and polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Polymer. 2004; 45:5557-5568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.06.008        [ Links ]

29. Strachota A, Whelan P, Krı'z J, Brus J, Urbanova M, Slouf M et al. Formation of nanostructured epoxy networks containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) blocks. Polymer. 2007; 48:3041-3058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.052        [ Links ]

30. Koberstein JT and Galambos AF. Multiple melting in segmented polyurethane block copolymers. Macromolecules. 1992; 25:5618-5624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma00047a010        [ Links ]

31. Flory PJ. Principles of Polymer. New York: Cornell University Press; 1953.         [ Links ]

32. Xu HY, Kuo SW, Lee JS and Chang FC. Preparations, Thermal Properties, and Tg Increase Mechanism of Inorganic/Organic Hybrid Polymers Based on Polyhedral Oligomeric Silsesquioxanes. Macromolecules. 2002 35:8788-8793. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma0202843        [ Links ]

33. Xu HB, Yang BH, Wang JF, Guang SY and Li C. Preparation, Thermal Properties, and Tg Increase Mechanism of Poly(acetoxystyrene-co-octavinyl-polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) Hybrid Nanocomposites. Macromolecules. 2005; 35:10455-10460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma0516687        [ Links ]

34. Nanda AK, Wicks DA, Madbouly AS and Otaigbe JU. Nanostructured Polyurethane/POSS Hybrid Aqueous Dispersions Prepared by Homogeneous Solution Polymerization. Macromolecules. 2006; 39:7037-7043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma060809h        [ Links ]

 

 

Received: September 28, 2011
Revised: May 31, 2012

 

 

* e-mail: janainajunges@gmail.com