SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue6Mechanical properties and thermal behaviour of LLDPE/MWNTs nanocompositesLaCrO3 composite coatings for AISI 444 stainless steel solid oxide fuel cell interconnects author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Materials Research

Print version ISSN 1516-1439

Mat. Res. vol.15 no.6 São Carlos Nov./Dec. 2012 Epub Oct 09, 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392012005000131 

Materials Research

 

The effect of reinforcement volume ratio on porosity and thermal conductivity in al-mgo composites

 

 

Recep Calin, Muharrem Pul*; Zühtü Onur Pehlivanli

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey

 

 


ABSTRACT

In this study, the effects of reinforcement volume ratios (RVR) on composite structure and thermal conductivity were examined in Al-MgO reinforced metal matrix composites (MMCs) of 5%, 10% and 15% RVR produced by melt stirring. In the production of composites, EN AW 1050A aluminum alloy was used as the matrix material and MgO powders with particle size of –105 µm were used as the reinforcement material. For every composite specimen was produced at 500 rev/min stirring speed, at 750 °C liquid matrix temperature and 4 minutes stirring time. Composite samples were cooled under normal atmosphere. Then, microstructures of the samples were determined and evaluated by using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) analysis. In general, it was observed that the reinforcement exhibited a homogeneous distribution. Furthermore, it was determined that the increase in the RVR increased porosity. From the Scanning Electron Microscope images, a thermal Ansys model was generated to determine effective thermal conductivity. Effective thermal conductivity of Al-MgO composites increased with the decrease in reinforcement volume ratio.

Keywords: metal-matrix composites, melt stirring, microstructure, porosity, thermal conductivity


 

 

1. Introduction

Development of technology and increasing demands of industry have lead to an increase in research and development studies on the production of composites with different properties in recent years. This increase is attributed to the high strength of composite materials with low specific weight. Additionally, due to the possibility of their production in different combinations with desired strength levels and their high fatigue resistance, toughness, high temperature strength as well as high oxidation and wear resistances contributed in the increased utilization of composites1.

There are many different composite materials and production types which are further growing. Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs) is one of these composite materials. All engineering materials can be used as matrix for the production of MMCs. Aluminium, magnesium and their alloys are the most commonly used matrix materials in the production of MMCs due to their lightness and ductility. Materials like SiC, SiO2 , Al2O3 and MgO are generally preferred as reinforcement elements. In the production of MMCs, different methods such as casting, melt stirring, powder metallurgy, in-situ and infiltration are used. Melt stirring method has a good potential in all-purpose applications as it is a low cost MMCs production method2. To obtain a successful reinforcement process in the production of MMCs, the most important and effective criterion is the selection of the appropriate method and material as reported by the literature. Furthermore, in MMCs production with melt stirring method, increased Reinforcement Volume Ratio (RVR) and decreased particle size resulted more difficult production process and increased porosity and particle agglomeration3,4.

Many studies have been conducted on the distribution of reinforcement elements inside the composites and their effect on microstructure, porosity, hardness, abrasion behavior and rupture strength as well as the effect of stirring time and speed5-16. In this study, the effect of RVR on composite microstructure and thermal properties were examined in 5%, 10% and 15% MgO reinforced composites produced by melt stirring method.

There are various studies investigating the effects of RVR on mechanical and thermal properties in composites17,18. Thermal conductivity of composite materials has recently emerged as an important research topic. Several techniques have been developed recently for conductivity measurements. The flash technique has been widely used for determining thermal properties at wide ranges of temperatures19,20. In this technique, which is also employed in this study, the front surface of a small sample is subjected to a very short burst of high intensity radiant energy. Numerical techniques have also been used in literature which calculates these properties21-23, but the main change of principle in the numerical analysis carried out in this study is the use of real Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images.

Microstructure has also significant importance on thermal conductivity behavior. Thermal conductivity can be kept under control by means of microstructural modification24,25. This can be performed by modeling studies using real microstructure images. However, for the application of Finite Element (FE), the individual intrinsic thermal conductivity values of the phases (ke:effective thermal conductivity) need to be calculated. In this study, finite element method is used to investigate the effect of RVR on thermal conductivity in Al-MgO composites produced by melt stirring.

 

2. Experimental Study

Commercially pure aluminum alloy (EN AW 1050A) and Magnesia (MgO) with particle size of –105 µm were used respectively as liquid matrix and reinforcement elements in the production of composite specimens. The chemical compositions of matrix material Al and reinforcement element MgO are given in Table 1.

For the production of composite specimens; matrix material Al was put in the crucible in Figure 1, melting process was started and continued until the temperature of liquid matrix increased to 750 °C. Stirring apparatus was immersed in liquid metal and stirring was started. Stirring speed was gradually increased until 500 rev/min and MgO powder determined on the basis of RVR was added in liquid metal by a funnel during stirring process. After the addition of reinforcement element MgO in liquid matrix Al, the mixture was stirred about 4 minutes at 500 rev/min in order to allow homogenous distribution of MgO particles in the mixture. Subsequent to the completion of stirring, the crucible was taken out of the furnace, the liquid melt was poured in steel containers of 30 mm diameter was allowed to cool down at room temperature. Same processes were applied separately for each RVR.

Then, to examine microstructures and porosity of composite materials, SEM, EDS and optical microscope images were taken. Besides, porosity of the composites was determined by Buoyancy method which is based on Archimedes principle. Finally, the numerical model was set up by transforming the real SEM images. From these images, a thermal Ansys model was generated to determine effective thermal conductivity.

 

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure properties and the effect of RVR on MgO particle distribution

SEM images of composite specimens with 5% MgO, 10% MgO and 15% MgO RVR produced by melt-stirring are given in Figure 2.

The SEM images indicate that generally, increased RVR in the specimens result improved homogeneous distribution of MgO particles. The white particles in microstructure images are MgO reinforcement elements. It is seen that reinforcement element was not disributed homogeneously in 5% MgO reinforced specimen (Figure 2a). This is possibly attributed to the partial agglomeration of the MgO particles and their exposure to sweeping during stirring in the low RVR. While the least homogeneous distribution of particles was recorded in 5% MgO reinforced specimen; homogeneity further improved in 10% MgO reinforced specimen (Figure 2b). and reached almost to that of the desired level in 15% MgO reinforced specimen (Figure 2c).

According to results; the liquid Al temperature of 750 °C was suitable and stirring speed of 500 rev/min and stirring time of 4 minutes were sufficient. Besides, the addition of MgO with the particle size of –105 µm into the Al matrix by melt stirring method was suitable and the composite specimens can be produced successfully.

To examine the behaviour in every part of the mould and to determine the level of homogeneity of reinforcement distribution, one piece of 10% MgO reinforced specimen was removed from the mould, polished with 1200 mesh emery paper and optical microscopic images from the top, central and bottom parts were taken. These images were given in Figure 3. Similar findings were also reported by Calin-Pul-Citak-Seker2.

 

 

As seen from the images in Figure 3, the reinforcement element MgO was generally distributed homogeneously. However, a slight increase in the reinforcement ratio towards the bottom parts is observed in the images. This situation can be clarified by precipitation of reinforcement during the cooling of liquid mixture due to its higher specific gravity than that of the matrix material Al.

3.2. The effect of RVR on the porosity structure

According to theoretical and experimental calculations results, porosity value is 3.99% in 5% MgO reinforced composite while porosity value is 4.16% in 10% MgO reinforced composite. The most porous structures are seen on the 15% MgO reinforced sample (4.42%). These values were given in Figure 4.

 

 

This also supports increasing amount of porosity on the SEM images depending on the RVR (Figure 5). Similar results were specified by Calin-Pul-Citak-Seker2.

EDS analyses were performed for the chemical identification of the reinforcement element MgO and matrix element Al in the composite specimens and the results of these analyses are given in Figures 6a and b.

When the microstructure in Figure 6 is examined, some amount of pores are seen in the composites which are formed at the matrix-reinforcement interface. The amount of pores can probably be decreased by increased stirring time. In the production of such MMCs, porosity can occur due to the difficulty in the wetting of the ceramic-based reinforcement elements by the matrix material Al. Similar findings were also reported by Calin-Citak, Acilar26,27.

3.3. The effect of RVR on effective thermal conductivity

A geometric model of the sample surface was developed for simulation of real micro structure images shown in Figures 2a-c. Images having different reinforcement volume ratios (RVR) were selected for the modeling study and were converted into a numerical model via a drawing tool for engineers (Mechanical Desktop). The reinforcement and matrix phases of boundaries were defined by conforming to the real image as much as possible to differentiate these two phases clearly. By the deffnition of the actual contacts, key points were identified for the transformation of the image to a numeric model. These key points were used to form the lines and the lines were used to form the areas. Consequently, the nodes were formed using the ANSYS (Finite Element Code). One by one reinforcement and matrix areas were meshed and the mesh form and the nodes, formed mesh later, in an enlarged image are shown in Figure 8a, 9a and 10a.

 

 

By the deffnition of the thermal conductivity of matrix and reinforcement phase, the problem was reduced to a heat transfer problem of a combined material, which is based on the heat transfer in a two-dimensional (2D) steady-state condition. Therefore, the solution was carried out under desired boundary conditions. In the solution, the Fourier heat transfer law (Equation 1) was applied in one direction, and a constant wall temperature and isolation surfaces was accepted as a boundary condition (see Figure 7)

where; qx is the total heat (W), Ti on the inlet surface temperature (K), To on the outlet surface temperature (K), k the thermal conductivity of material (W/m.K) and x the distance of heat flow.

Then, effective thermal conductivity values of the composite materials were determined by Equation 1 with obtained from numeric results. Heat flux values (qx) have been obtained with help of numerical analysis and Equation 1. Effective thermal conductivity values of composite materials have been calculated by averaging and these values have been given Table 2. Similar results have been obtained in literature28,29.

As the volumetric ratios used in the analytical models are determined from the digital images of the micrographs of composites, variations in the calculated thermal conductivities are observed depending on the RVR of composites.

The results, obtained from numerical analyses for different reinforcement ratios, showed how heat flow occurred in composite materials to addition it is given materials of effective thermal conductivity values. Finite element mesh of around of reinforcement materials as it can be seen from Figure 7a, 8a and 9a are created more intense according to matrix. The magnitudes of the thermal flux in an enlarged image examined numerically are shown in Figure 8b, 9b and 10b. When we investigate Figure 8b, 9b and 10b, it is clear that thermal flux is low in dark coloured part and it is high in light coloured part. Increased MgO reinforcement resulted decreased thermal conductivity of composites. The thermal resistance values at the ceramic particles are very high due to the very low thermal conductivity of reinforcement particle with respect to that of matrix. Depending on this, the magnitude of the thermal flux is greater in the Al matrix while it is much lower in MgO particles. This situation is directly related to the conductivity coefficients.

 

4. Conclusion

The main results obtained from this study are summarized below:

In the MMCs production by the melt stirring method, the MgO with the particle size of –105 µm was homogeneously distributed inside the liquid Al at all RVR. In this case, the particle size of the composite used in the production of MgO can be said to be appropriate.

There is a little difficulty in wetting because of increasing the amount of MgO reinforcement in liquid matrix.

It can be stated that 750 °C liquid Al temperature, 500 rev/min, the mixing speed and mixing time of 4 minutes were sufficient in experiments. However, to obtain more homogeneous distribution of reinforcement within the matrix MgO and to improve the wetting these values can be increased.

Depending on the increasing MgO reinforcement ratio, the porosities increased in the composites. Increasing the porosities in high volume reinforcement may be benefit to reducing the effective thermal conductivity of Al-MgO composites.

To say how much decrease porosity rate within composite structure, experiment parameters like the liquid Al temperature, stirring speed, stirring time are changed, In the RVR, wide range of experiments can be made and this may be evaluated as a separate study.

The effective thermal conductivity of Al-MgO composites increases while the RVR decreases. The magnitude of the thermal flux is greater in the Al matrix while it is much lower with respect to this value in MgO particles

 

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to Kirikkale University for the support of this work with the project number of 2011/72.

 

References

1. Sur G, Sahin Y and Gokkaya H. Production of aluminum based particulate reinforced composites using molten metal mixing and squeeze casting methods. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University. 2005; 2:233-238.         [ Links ]

2. Calin R, Pul M, Citak R and Seker U. The effect of reinforcement ratio on the composite structure and mechanical properties in Al-MgO composites produced by the melt stirring method. Advanced Composites Letters. 2011; 20(4): 91-96.         [ Links ]

3. Sur G, Sahin Y. and Gokkaya H. Production of Aluminum Based Particulate Reinforced Composites Using Molten Metal Mixing and Squeeze Casting Methods. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University. 2005; 20(2):233-238.         [ Links ]

4. Seo YH and Kang CG. The Effect of Applied Pressure on Particle-Dispersion Characteristics and Mechanical Properties in Melt-Stirring Squeeze-Cast SiCp/Al Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1995; 55:370-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)02033-0         [ Links ]

5. Hanumanth GS and Irons GA. Particle incorporation by melt stirring for the production of metal-matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science. 1993; 28:2459-2465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01151680         [ Links ]

6. Hashim J, Looney L and Hashmi MSJ. Particle distribution in cast metal matrix composites-Part I. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2002; 123:251-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00098-5         [ Links ]

7. Tham LM, Gupta M and Cheng L. Influence of processing parameters during disintegrated melt deposition processing on near net shape synthesis of aluminium based metal matrix composites. Materials Science and Technology. 1999; 15:1139-1146.         [ Links ]

8. Kok M. Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2005; 161:381-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.068         [ Links ]

9. Luo A. Processing, microstructure, and mechanical behavior of cast magnesium metal matrix composites. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 1995; 26:2445-2455.         [ Links ]

10. Naher S, Brabazon D and Looney L. Development and assessment of a new quick quench stir caster design for the production of metal matrix composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2004; 166:430-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.043         [ Links ]

11. Ray S. Synthesis of cast metal matrix particulate composites. Journal of Materials Science. 1993; 28:5397-5413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00367809         [ Links ]

12. Salvo L, L’Espérance G, Suéry M and Legoux JG. Interfacial reactions and age hardening in Al-Mg-Si metal matrix composites reinforced with SiC particles. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 1994; 177:173-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-5093(94)90489-8

13. Bindumadhavan PN, Chia TK, Chandrasekaran M, Wah HK, Lam LN and Prabhakar O. Effect of particle-porosity clusters on tribological behavior of cast aluminum alloy A356-SiCp metal matrix composites. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2001; 315:217-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01989-4         [ Links ]

14. Prabu SB, Karunamoorthy L, Kathiresan S and Mohan B. Influence of stirring speed and stirring time on distribution of particles in cast metal matrix composite. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2006; 171:268-273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.071         [ Links ]

15. Pai BC, Ramani G, Pillai RM and Satyanarayana KG. Role of magnesium in cast aluminium alloy matrix composites. Journal of Materials Science. 1995; 30:1903-1911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00353012         [ Links ]

16. Zhou W and Xu ZM. Casting of SiC Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1997; 63:358-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02647-7         [ Links ]

17. Assar AEM. Fabrication of matrix composite by infiltration process - Part 2: Experimental study. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1999; 86:152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00304-5         [ Links ]

18. Calin R and Citak R. Effect of Mg Content of Matrix on Infiltration Height in Producing MgO Reinforced Al Matrix Composite by Vacuum Infiltration Method. Materials Science Forum. 2007; 546-549:611-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.611         [ Links ]

19. Casto SL, Valvo EL and Micari F. Measurement of temperature distribution within tool in metal cutting. Experimental tests and numerical analysis. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology. 1989; 20:35-46.         [ Links ]

20. Liu Y-R, Liu J-J, Zhu B-L, Luo Z-B and Miao H-Z. The computer simulation of the temperature distribution on the surface of ceramic cutting tools. Wear, An International Journal on the Science and Technology of Friction, Lubrication and Wear. 1997; 210:39-44.         [ Links ]

21. Yang R and Chen G. Thermal Conductivity Modeling of Periodic Two-Dimensional Nanocomposites. Physical Review B. 2004; 69:1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.195316         [ Links ]

22. Watari K, Hirao K, Toriyama M and Ishizaki K. Effect of Grain Size on the Thermal Conductivity of Si3N4. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1999; 82:777-779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01835.x         [ Links ]

23. Hirao K, Watari K, Brito ME, Toriyama M and Kanzaki S. High Thermal Conductivity in Silicon Nitride with Anisotropic Microstructure. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1996; 79:2485-2488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb09002.x         [ Links ]

24. Haggerty JS and Lightfoot A. Opportunities for Enhancing the Thermal Conductivities of SiC and Si3N4 Ceramics through Improved Processing. Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. 1995; 475-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470314715.ch52         [ Links ]

25. Watari K. High Thermal Conductivity Non-Oxide Ceramics. Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan. 2001; 109:7-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2109/jcersj.109.S7         [ Links ]

26. Calin R and Citak R. Effect of Powder size on infiltration height in producing MgO reinforced Al matrix composites by vacuum infiltration method. Materials science forum. 2007; 534-536:797-800. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.534-536.797         [ Links ]

27. Acilar M and Gul F. Production and development of A1-10Si/SiCp metal matrix composites by vacuum infiltration. Journal of Polytechnic. 2002; 4:21-27.         [ Links ]

28. Calin R. Effect of Reinforced Volume Ratio on Thermal Conductivity of SiO2 Reinforced Al Matrix Composite Produced by Vacuum Infiltration Method. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2010; 22(1):808-814.         [ Links ]

29. Citak R, Calin R and Pehlivanli Z. Effect of Reinforcement Volume Ratio on Thermal Conductivity of MgO Reinforced Al Matrix Composite Produced by Vacuum Infiltration Method. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 2010; 22(5):4054-4060.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received: January 21, 2012
Revised: August 1, 2012

 

 

*e-mail: mpul@gazi.edu.tr; muharrempul@hotmail.com