SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 issue6The effect of reinforcement volume ratio on porosity and thermal conductivity in Al-Mgo compositesMechanical spectroscopy study of the Cu36Zr59Al5 and Cu54Zr40Al6 amorphous alloys author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Materials Research

Print version ISSN 1516-1439

Mat. Res. vol.15 no.6 São Carlos Nov./Dec. 2012 Epub Oct 23, 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392012005000140 

LaCrO3 composite coatings for AISI 444 stainless steel solid oxide fuel cell interconnects

 

 

Wilson AccharI, *; Ledjane Silva BarretoII; Herval Ramos Paes JuniorIII; Clawsio Rogerio CruzI; Eduardo Etzberger FeistauerII

IPostgraduate Program of Science and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, CEP 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brazil
IIPostgraduate Program of Science and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Sergipe - UFS, CEP 49000-100, Sergipe, SE, Brazil
IIILaboratório de Materiais Avançados, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense - UENF, CEP 28013-602, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, Brasil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Doped lanthanum chromite-based ceramics are the most widely used interconnector material in solid fuel cells (SOFC) since they exhibit significant electrical and thermal conductivity, substantial corrosion resistance and adequate mechanical strength at ambient and high temperatures. The disadvantage of this material is its high cost and poor ductility. The aim of this study is to determine the mechanical and oxidation behavior of a stainless steel (AISI 444) with a LaCrO3 deposition on its surface obtained through spray pyrolisis. Coated and pure AISI 444 materials were characterized by mechanical properties, oxidation behavior, X-ray diffraction and scanning electronic microscopy. Results indicated that the coated material displays better oxidation behavior in comparison to pure stainless steel, but no improvement in mechanical strength. Both materials indicate that deformation behavior depends on testing temperatures.

Keywords: lanthanum chromite, interconnector, oxidation, mechanical strength, AISI 444


 

 

1. Introduction

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) are a new source of clean energy for electrical generation1. Planar cells consist of several cell units separated by an interconnector2, whose main role is as an electrical connection between the cells. The interconnector must be also compatible with all cell components3 and stable with respect to oxiding and reducing gases, present in the SOFC. Typical requirements of an interconnect material are: high electronic conductivity, chemical stability, thermal expansion match to other cell components, significant mechanical strength and- thermal conductivity, low manufacturing and material costs4,5.Lanthanum chromite (LaCrO3) doped with calcium, strontium and magnesium is the most viable material, since it exhibits relatively high electronic conductivity in both fuel and oxidant atmospheres, moderate stability in fuel cell environments and good compatibility with other cell components in terms of phase, microstructure and thermal expansion1,4,16,17. Reducing cell operating temperature from 1000 °C to 800 °C makes using metallic materials as interconnects an attractive alternative. The main advantages of metallic over ceramic interconnects are lower manufacturing costs6 and higher deformation capacity7. Chromium- and iron-based alloys are the most widely investigated metallic interconnect materials5,8,9. The main drawbacks limiting use of these materials are: low oxidation resistance over the projected service lifetime (40000 h) at high operating temperature10 and ability to develop oxide scales with sufficiently high electronic conductivity9; Cr volatilization, and limited strength at operating cell temperatures8. Studies have proposed the use of a coating on the metallic interconnector material as an oxidation layer7,13,14,15. Different techniques have focused on developing protective coatings for steel interconnects11, such as, sol-gel, chemical vapor deposition12, pulsed laser deposition, plasma spraying14 and screen-printing13. Applying Co/LaCrO3 coating to AISI 430 stainless steel improves oxidation resistance. However, silica networks that form at the metal-scale interface result in scale and pore formation in Co-LaCrO3-coated specimens7. Calcium or strontium-doped lanthanum chromite thin film layers are successfully manufactured using a dipping technique, but oxidation performance was not adequate8. A protection layer of MnCo1.9Fe0.1O4 spinel can be densified on ferritic steels though reactive sintering. Results show excellent structural and thermo stability of these spinel protection layers; however, the thermal expansion match between the spinel and LaSrCoFe contact layer seems to be insufficient for thermal cycling12.

The present study describes the thermo-mechanical effect of LaCrO3 as a protective coating on AISI 444 stainless steel.

 

2. Experimental procedure

LaCrO3 thin films were deposited on the AISI 444 substrate (ferritic stainless steel, from Arcelor Mittal) using a spray-pyrolysis technique (Figure 1). Polished metallic substrates were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone for 20 minutes, rinsed in distilled water, soaked for 30 s in acetone and then dried.

Precursor solutions for the LaCrO3 thin film coating were prepared from starting materials of lanthanum nitrate hexahydrate (La(NO3)3 . 6 H2O) and chromium tri-oxide (CrO3) (Aldrich Chemicals). Precursor concentration was 0.05 M. Adequate amounts of starting materials were dissolved in distilled water and isopropyl alcohol. Operating conditions for spray pyrolisis used in this investigation are shown in Table 1. Finally, the resulting thin films were heat-treated at 900 °C for 120 minutes in a labor furnace (EDG, Brazil).

 

 

The oxidation treatment was examined at 850 and 900 °C for 1.5 × 103 minutes in air. For comparison with non-coated AISI 444, thin film coated and non-coated substrates were oxidized under the same conditions.

Crystallization and oxidation behavior were analyzed with X-ray diffraction (XRD 6000, Shimadzu) in order to study the stability of both materials at high temperatures.

Mechanical strength of the sintered specimens (average of five bodies for each value) was measured in 20 × 10 × 1.2 mm samples on a universal testing machine (Zwick-Roell, Germany) in three-point bending tests at a constant crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min under high and ambient temperatures.

Microstructural aspects of surface and cross-sectional morphology for coated land non-coated materials were examined using optical and scanning electron microcopy (Shimadzu SSX-550).

 

3. Results and discussion

Table 2 displays the chemical composition of the stainless steel studied. As expected, the material consists primarily of iron (bal.), carbon (0,025 wt. (%)), manganese (1,0 wt. (%)), phosphorus (0,040 wt. (%)), sulfur (0,030 wt. (%)), silicon (1,00 wt. (%)), nickel (1,00 wt. (%)) and chromium (17.55 wt. (%)). Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of both investigated materials. As expected, pure and coated AISI 444 material indicates the presence of the Fe-Cr phase (AISI 444) and LaCrO3, respectively. No evidence of other phases was found. Figure 3 depicts the microstructural aspects of both materials. As shown, the LaCrO3 material presents a homogeneous grain size distribution, with a grain size of approximately 0.7 µm. Microstructural aspects of the transverse cross-section of AISI 444 with LaCrO3 deposition are presented in Figure 4. The spray pyrolysis process produced a regular LaCrO3 layer along the surface with a layer depth of approximately 100 µm.

 

 

Figure 4 shows mapping of the principal elements across the transverse section of stainless steel with lanthanum chromite deposition. Results indicate the constant presence of Cr in the stainless steel, along the interface and in deposition. As expected, the concentration of lanthanum is low in the steel region and high in the deposited layer. The amount of Fe element is elevated in the steel and not present in the coated region. Figure 5 presents the strength behavior at ambient and high-temperatures. Both materials exhibited very similar behavior, regardless of temperature. Strength values of the composite materials at ambient temperature are higher when compared to LaCrO3 (180-260 MPa)4, but similar at 900 °C (50-100 MPa)10. At 900 °C, the materials display significantly higher deformation values in comparison to ambient temperature, which is characteristic of metallic behavior (Figure 5). No significant difference was found between materials, which may indicate that deposition has notable effect on strength behavior of metallic substrate. Similar strength behavior was observed for creeping tests in high-Cr ferritic steels6.

 

 

Figure 6 illustrates the oxidation behavior of the investigated materials. Results demonstrated that deposition of LaCrO3 improved oxidation resistance of pure AISI 444, regardless of oxidation temperature. Weight gain of coated materials was significantly lower in relation to stainless steel. Application of (La,Sr)FeO3 protection layers on ferritic steel also resulted in some improvement in oxidation resistance15.

Figure 7 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of stainless steel and the coated material after oxidation tests. Analyses indicated the AISI 444 material exhibits formation of a new crystalline phase (Cr2O3) at high temperatures. The presence of Cr2O3 and similar oxidation behavior was also observed in the literature8,13. Furthermore, the coated material displays a new crystalline phase (Fe-Cr), which is evidence of Fe diffusion from the steel across the steel/LaCrO3 interface. Analogous results were also observed elsewhere7. No presence of Fe2O3 was identified in X-ray diffraction patterns. Figure 8 shows a surface defect on the AISI 444 surface produced during spray pyrolisis. The absence of the protection layer (LaCrO3) on the metal base increases steel oxidation. The coated material demonstrates an abrupt increase in mass gain during analysis (Figure 8). The spray pyrolisis process must be improved in order to avoid such surface defects.

Further studies are still underway in order to optimize the quality of the spray pyrolisis process and its consequent properties. Creep tests should be also performed.

 

4. Conclusions

Lanthanum chromite thin film layers are successfully manufactured using a spray pyrolisis technique from precursor solutions. Nevertheless, this process needs to be improved in order to avoid the deposition defect observed on the surface and resulting decrease in the oxidation resistance. A denser microstructure is observed for the LaCrO3 thin film on the AISI 4444 substrate. The use of LaCrO3 coating on the AISI 444 stainless steel significantly improves oxidation resistance. Thermo-mechanical properties of the composite are strongly dependent on the temperature. The material shows substantial strengths and low deformation values at ambient temperature. Increasing test temperature results in a loss of mechanical resistance and greater deformation.

 

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the CNPq and FINEP for their financial support.

 

References

1. Stover D, Buchkremer HP, Titz F and Menzler NF. Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCS). The Everlasting Challenge for High-performance Ceramics. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Ceramics; 2008; Verona. Verona; 2008.         [ Links ]

2. Subhash C and Kendall K. High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Design and Application. Elsevier; 2003.         [ Links ]

3. Zhu WZ and Deevi SC. Development of interconnect materials for solid oxide fuel cells. Materials & Science Engineering A. 2003; 348:227-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00736-0        [ Links ]

4. Sammes NM and Ratnaraj R. High temperature mechanical properties of La1-xSrxCr1- yCoyO3 for SOFC interconnect. Journal of Materials Science. 1995; 30:4523-4526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01153057        [ Links ]

5. Fergus JW. Metallic interconnects for solid oxide fuel cells. Materials Science & Engineering A. 2005; 397:271-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.047        [ Links ]

6. Froitzheim J, Meier GH, Niewolak L, Ennis PJ, Hattendorf H, Singheiser L et al. Development of high strength ferritic steel for interconnect application in SOFCs. Journal of Power Sources. 2008; 178:163-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.12.028        [ Links ]

7. Shaigan N, Qu W, Ivey DG and Chen W. A review of recent progress in coating, surface modifications and alloy developments for solid oxide fuel cell ferritic stainless steel interconnects. Journal of Power Sources. 2010; 195:1529-1542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.09.069        [ Links ]

8. Lee EA, Lee S, Hwang HJ and Moon JW. Sol-gel derived (La0.8M0.2)CrO3(M=Ca,Sr) coating layer on stainless-steel substrate for use as a separator in intermediate temperature solid fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources. 2006; 157:709-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.030        [ Links ]

9. Horita T, Xiong Y, Yamaji K, Sakai N and Yokokawa H. Stability of Fe-Cr alloy interconnects under CH4-H2O atmosphere for SOFCS. Journal of Power Sources. 2003; 118:35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(03)00058-2        [ Links ]

10. Sammes NM, Ratnaraj R and Fee MG. The effect of sintering on the mechanical properties of SOFC ceramic interconnect materials. Journal of Materials Science. 1994; 29:4319-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00414217        [ Links ]

11. Shaigan N, Ivey DG and Chen W. Co/LaCrO3 composite coating for AISI 430 stain- less solid oxide fuel cell interconnectors. Journal of Power Sources. 2008; 185:331-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.065        [ Links ]

12. Montero X, Tietz, F, Sebold D, Buchkremer HP, Ringuede A, Cassir M et al. MnCo1.9Fe0.1O4 spinel protection layer on commercial ferritic steels for interconnect applications in solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources. 2008; 184:172-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.05.081        [ Links ]

13. Chu CL, Lee J, Lee TH and Cheng YN. Oxidation behavior of metallic interconnect coated with La-Sr-Mn film by screen painting and plasma sputtering. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34:422-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.091        [ Links ]

14. Zhen YD, Jiang SP, Zhang S and Tan V. Interaction between metallic interconnect And constituent oxides of (La,Sr)MnO3 coating of solid oxide fuel cells. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2006; 26:3253-3264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.10.002        [ Links ]

15. Yang Z, Xia GG, Maupin GD and Stevenson JW. Conductive protection layers on oxidation resistant alloys for SOFC interconnect applications. Surface & Coating Technology. 2006; 201:4476-4483. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.082        [ Links ]

16. Fergus JW. Lanthanum chromite-based materials for solid oxide fuel cell interconnects. Solid State Ionics. 2004; 171:1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2004.04.010        [ Links ]

17. Badwal SPS. Stability of solid oxide fuel cell components. Solid State Ionics. 2001; 143:39-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00831-1        [ Links ]

 

 

Received: March 22, 2012
Revised: August 3, 2012

 

 

* e-mail: acchar@dfte.ufrn.br