Flexural Behavior of Epoxy Matrix Composites Reinforced with Malva Fiber

Abstract

Polymer composites reinforced with natural fibers have been increasingly investigated and applied as engineering materials owing to their economical, technical, societal and environmental advantages. The malva fiber, particularly an important resource in the Amazon region in Brazil, only recently begin to be investigated as possible composite reinforcement for engineering application. However, the mechanical properties of composites reinforced with malva fiber are still unknown. In this paper, the flexural behavior of epoxy matrix composites reinforced with continuous malva fiber was for the first time investigated. Specimens of continuous malva fibers aligned along an epoxy matrix were press-molded. Three-points bending test were performed and the fractured specimens were analyzed by SEM. The results showed a marked improvement in the composites flexural properties with the increase in the amount of reinforced malva fiber. This improvement was found to match the Rule of Mixtures, which revealed the unique potential of malva composites for engineering applications.

Keywords:
epoxy composite; malva fiber; flexural behavior; fracture analysis

1 Introduction

In the past two decades, polymeric composites reinforced with natural lignocellulosic fibers, obtained from different parts of plants, have been extensively investigated in hundreds of works that were discussed in several review articles^1-13. It is currently recognized that, as composite reinforcement, the lignocellulosic fibers may compete with synthetic ones, such as glass fiber^14,15, in terms of economical, technical, societal and environmental advantages. In fact, the engineering application of lignocellulosic fibers is considered an environmentally friendly alternative to replace more expensive, non-recyclable and energy-intensive synthetic fibers¹⁶. Important industrial sectors, from packing and sport appliances to house construction and automobiles^17-19, are already using lignocellulosic fiber reinforced composites in components. However, some drawbacks such non-uniform dimensions and heterogeneous properties as well as incompatibility with a hydrophobic polymer matrix, reduce the potential of lignocellulosic fiber to be used as composite reinforcement¹¹. In particular, a low interfacial strength causes a weak adhesion between the hydrophilic fiber and the polymeric matrix¹².

In Brazil, the variety of lignocellulosic fibers is an additional motivation for the study of new polymer composites reinforced with these fibers²⁰. Among them, attention is now being focused on that extracted from the stem of the malva plant, Figure 1, originally from Asia and today cultivated in meadows of rivers, particularly in the Amazon region. The malva, also known as mallow, belongs to the malvaceae family, which comprises several species, such as the Malva sylvestris and the Urena lobata L.. Its fiber has been of economical interest for textile and simple items production in low-income areas. Review papers^1-13 and possible uses as engineering materials reinforcing higher aggregate value polymer composites, have totally ignored the malva fiber. As an exception, Leão et al.²¹ indicate the malva fiber composites as an alternative for the automotive industry. Our recent investigations, however, disclosed its potential as composite reinforcement. Preliminary tests with malva fiber revealed tensile strength of 214-497 MPa and Young’s modulus of 8.8 GPa. These values are superior than traditional natural fibers, such as bamboo and coir¹⁶. A Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy analysis was also reported for the malva fiber²² showing particular bands not found in other lignocellulosic fiber. The incorporation of malva in polyester composites improved the dynamic mechanical viscoelastic stiffness²³. A photoacoustic thermal characterization²⁴ showed that the malva fiber is a good thermal insulator. Pullout tests found a malva fiber critical length of 2.6 mm and interfacial shear strength of 3.1 MPa with respect to an epoxy matrix²⁵.

Figure 1
Malva plant (a) and fibers drying after extraction (b).

Despite these recent investigations, the mechanical properties are yet to be evaluated for the malva fiber polymer composites. These properties are basic requirements for any engineering application. Therefore, the objective of this work was, for the first time, to investigate the mechanical behavior of composites reinforced with malva fiber by evaluating their flexural properties.

2 Experimental Procedure

2.1 Materials

The malva fiber investigated in this study was of the species Urena lobata L., commercially supplied by the Brazilian firm Castanhal Textil. Figure 2 illustrates the as-received bundle of malva fibers as well as some long and continuous fibers separated for composite reinforcement. As the composite matrix, a diglycidyl ether of the bisphenol A (DGEBA) epoxy resin with equivalent weight of 187.3 g/eq mixed with trietylene tetramine (TETA) as hardener in stoichiometric proportion of parts per hundred, phr, 13 was used.

Figure 2
Bundle of malva fibers (a) and separated long and continuous fiber for composite reinforcement (b).

2.2 Methods

2.2.1 Preparation of composites

The as-received fibers were cleaned and dried before use. Composites with 0, 10%, 20% and 30% in volume of aligned malva fibers were manufactured through accommodation of the fibers in a 152 × 122 × 10 mm rectangular mold and mixed with the DEGEBA/TETA epoxy resin. The mold was kept under pressure of 20 MPa at room temperature (RT) for 24 hours for curing the resin. The cured rectangular plates were cut into 6 specimens with dimensions of 122 × 25 × 10 mm, maintaining the fiber aligned along the length.

2.2.2 Testing

The specimens were RT three points bend tested in a model 5582 Instron machine with 100 kN of capacity at a strain rate of 1.6 × 10^–2 s^–1 and a span-to-depth ratio of 9, according to the ASTM D790-03 norm²⁶. The flexural rupture strength, σ_f, was calculated by the following equation:

$${{\displaystyle \sigma }}_f=\frac{3F_{m}L}{2b{d}^2}$$ (1)

where F_m is the maximum applied load until rupture, L the distance between supports, b and d are the width and thickness of the specimen, respectively

2.2.3 Fractography

The fracture surface of the specimens was characterized after gold sputtering by scanning electron microscopy, SEM, in a model 6460 LV Jeol microscope, operating at a voltage of 20 kV for the secondary electron beam.

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Flexural testing

Figure 3 illustrates the typical appearance of load vs. elongation curves obtained in bending tests for epoxy composites reinforced with different amounts of malva fibers. These curves were recorded directly from the Instron machine and revealed that malva fibers reinforced epoxy composites present limited plastic deformation, with a tendency for rupture just beyond the elastic limit. After an approximately straight line, a sudden fracture occurs, indicating a brittle behavior for both pure epoxy and malva fiber composites. This is mainly a consequence of the limited plasticity of the brittle epoxy matrix. From the curves in Figure 3, the value of the maximum loads, F_m, and the corresponding deflection were obtained. The flexural rupture strength was then calculated by the Equation 1, while the deflection to rupture and the flexural elastic modulus obtained from corresponding curves and stress/strain ratio.

Figure 3
Load (N) versus deformation (mm) curves, for malva/epoxy composites with different amounts of malva fibers: (a) 0%; (b) 10%; (c) 20% and (d) 30% in volume.

Figure 4 shows the variation of the flexural rupture strength of the neat epoxy as well as the epoxy matrix composites reinforced with up to 30 vol% of continuous and aligned malva fibers. In this figure, it is worth noticing the significant reinforcement caused by incorporation of continuous and aligned malva fibers into the epoxy matrix. Indeed, up to 30 vol% an increasing straight (dashed) line can be adjusted to the experimental points. Based on the principles of fiber reinforcement²⁴ the results in Figure 4 are expected since the strength of the malva fibers, 214-497 MPa²², is considerably higher than that of the epoxy matrix, 28-90 MPa.

Figure 4
Variation of the flexural rupture strength with the volume fraction of malva fibers in epoxy composites.

Figure 5 displays the variation of total deflection until rupture for the neat epoxy specimen and for the epoxy matrix composites reinforced with up to 30 vol% of continuous and aligned malva fibers. One should note in this figure that there is a tendency to decrease the total deflection with the incorporation of malva fiber. However, within the standard deviations (error bars) this decrease is negligible and might not be assigned to any particular mechanism.

Figure 5
Variation of the total deflection with the volume fraction of malva fibers in epoxy composites.

Figure 6 shows the flexural modulus of elasticity dependence on the volume fraction of incorporated malva fibers in epoxy matrix composites. It should be noticed in Figure 6 that, similar to Figure 4, there is a clear linear tendency between the flexural modulus of elasticity and the volume fraction of malva fibers. A sharp rise in flexural modulus indicates a marked increase in bending stiffness of the epoxy matrix by the incorporation of malva fibers. This increase is comparable to that obtained for the flexural rupture strength in Figure 4. Indeed, any elastic modulus is measured as the ratio between the stress and corresponding strain inside the initial elastic stage. Consequently, the stiffness is directly dependent on the strength. Since the strain, which in the case of a bend tests is associated with the deflection, does not show much change with incorporated malva fiber, Figure 5, then one should expect the same linear type of relation for both strength and flexural elastic modulus as actually shown in Figures 4 and 6. In fact, the elastic modulus of the malva fibers, of 8.8 GPa, is much higher than that of the epoxy matrix, around 2 GPa. Based on the theory of fiber reinforcement²⁶, this justifies the marked linear increase in stiffness observed in Figure 6.

Figure 6
Variation of the flexural modulus with the volume fraction of malva fibers in epoxy composites.

A simple explanation for the linear relationship found in the variation of the flexural strength (σ_c), Figure 4, and flexural modulus (E_c), Figure 6, can be given by the Rule of Mixtures applied to composites reinforced with continuous and aligned fibers²⁷:

σ_c = σ_m (1-v_f) + σ_f v_f(2)

E_c = E_m (1-v_f) + E_f v_f(3)

where σ_m an E_m are the strength and modulus of the matrix; σ_f an E_f the tensile strength and modulus of the fiber; and v_f the volume fraction of the fiber.

Figure 7 compares the experimental results for the: (a) flexural strength, Figure 4, and (b) flexural modulus, Figure 6, with corresponding Equations 2 and 3. The plots of these equations extend to the limit values obtained for the tensile strength, 214-497 MPa, and the tensile modulus, 8.8 GPa, of malva fibers. It is important to note in Figure 7 that the extension of experimental points linear adjustment reaches the corresponding values of strength and modulus of the neat (100%) malva fibers.

Figure 7
Experimental data and corresponding Rule of Mixtures: (a) flexural strength and (b) flexural modulus.

The Rule of Mixtures was previously¹¹ applied in bend test results of polyester composites reinforced with two different lignocellulosic fibers: curaua and piassava. In both cases, the flexural strength followed straight lines similar to that shown in Figure 4. A relevant distinction occurred for the curaua fiber, which fails to match its theoretical Rule of Mixtures line, Equation 2, due to fiber surface conditions. On the contrary, the piassava fiber experimental results fit well the Rule of Mixtures, Equation 2, owing to the improved fiber adherence. In the case of malva fibers, the experimental results, Figure 7, fit well the Rule of Mixtures for the lower value of fiber tensile strength. This agrees with the fact that the lower malva fiber tensile strength, 214 MPa, is associated with fibers with thicker diameter and more defects. The lower strength of the thicker fibers in the present work, using fibers with different diameters, will be the limitation of the composites strength.

3.2 Fractography

Fracture analysis contributes to explain the improvement provided by the malva fiber reinforcement to the epoxy matrix of the investigated composites. Figure 8 displays the SEM fractograph of a bend tested sample of neat epoxy, i.e., 0% of malva fiber. In this figure, one should note the brittle aspect of the rupture, with river patterns corresponding to crack propagation without obstacle. This is responsible for a relatively low breaking load, Figure 3a, and corresponding lower flexural rupture strength, as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 8
SEM fractograph of a bend tested neat epoxy (400x).

The incorporation of malva fiber causes composite reinforcement in association with changes in the fracture behavior. Figure 9 shows SEM fractographs of bend tested epoxy composites reinforced with 10, 20 and 30 vol% of aligned malva fibers. The main point to be observed in this figure is the well adhered malva fiber into the epoxy matrix. Indeed, only few holes associated with fiber pullout were detected. Moreover, the fractured epoxy in between the fibers displays evidence of crack being arrested at the fibers interface. This is strongly demonstrated by the broken matrix around a fiber in Figure 9a.

Figure 9
SEM fractographs of bend tested epoxy matrix composites reinforced with (a) 10 vol%; (b) 20 vol% and (c) 30 vol% of malva fibers.

In particular, the homogeneous distribution of fibers throughout the fracture surface and their good adherence to the epoxy is illustrated, with lower magnification for the 30 vol% malva fiber composite, in Figure 10. In the figure inset, typical river patterns indicate (arrow) a crack arrest by a malva fiber. This corresponds to a strengthening mechanism, which improves the mechanical properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites^11,12 and justifies the results shown in Figures 4, 6 and 7. As previously discussed¹¹, a good fiber adherence to the polymeric matrix is the basic condition for the match between the experimental results and the Rule of Mixtures, as shown in Figure 7, for both flexural strength and modulus.

Figure 10
Low magnification SEM fractograph of bend tested epoxy matrix composite reinforced with 30 vol% of malva fibers.

4 Final Remarks

As a final remark, the novel flexural results of epoxy matrix composites incorporated with up to 30 vol% of continuous and aligned malva fibers revealed a significant reinforcement effect. Both the flexural strength and the flexural modulus, which is associated with the composite stiffness, increase with the amount of malva fiber, according to linear relationships that match the corresponding Rule of Mixtures fundamental equations. This is an unique result that not only confirms the best possible reinforcement of the malva fibers to the epoxy but also indicates an effective adhesion between fiber and matrix.

5 Conclusions

• •

  Bend tests performed on epoxy matrix showed a linear increase in both flexural rupture strength and flexural modulus of elasticity up to 30 vol% of continuous and aligned malva fibers.

• •

  These strength and modulus linear relationships match with the fundamental Rule of Mixtures and indicate the best possible reinforcement, which is an unique behavior and most convenient for engineering application.

• •

  SEM fractographic analysis confirms not only an effective adhesion of the malva fiber to the epoxy matrix but also the crack arrest by the fiber that contributes to the superior flexural reinforcement behavior.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support to this investigation by the Brazilian agencies: CNPq, CAPES and FAPERJ. It is also acknowledged the permission to the use of the SEM microscope by the PEMM from COPPE/UFRJ.

References

• ¹
  Satyanarayana KG, Sukumaran K, Mukherjee PS, Pavithran C and Pillai SG. Natural fibre-polymer composites. Cement and Concrete Composites. 1990; 12(2):117-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(90)90049-4.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0958-9465(90)90049-4
• ²
  Bledzki AK and Gassan J. Composites reinforced with cellulose-based fibers. Progress in Polymer Science. 1999; 4(1):221-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5
• ³
  Nabi Saheb DN and Jog JP. Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Advances in Polymer Technology. 1999; 18(1):351-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-X.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2329(199924)18:4<351::AID-ADV6>3.0.CO;2-X
• ⁴
  Mohanty AK, Misra M and Hinrichsen G. Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering. 2000; 276(1):1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1439-2054(20000301)276:1<1::AID-MAME1>3.0.CO;2-W
• ⁵
  Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N, Mwakambo LY, Ansell MP, Dufresne A, et al. Review of current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. Journal of Materials Science. 2001; 36(1):2107-2113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017512029696.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017512029696
• ⁶
  Mohanty AK, Misra M and Drzal LT. Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. Journal of Polymers and the Environment. 2002; 10(1/2):19-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021013921916.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1021013921916
• ⁷
  Netravali AN and Chabba S. Composites get greener. Materials Today. 2003; 6(4):22-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00427-9.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00427-9
• ⁸
  Crocker J. Natural materials innovative natural composites. Mater Technol. 2008; 2-3(3):174-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/175355508X373378.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/175355508X373378
• ⁹
  John MJ and Thomas S. Biofibers and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2008; 71(3):343-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040
• ¹⁰
  Satyanarayana KG, Arizaga GGC and Wypych F. Biodegradable composites based on lignocellulosic fibers: an overview. Progress in Polymer Science. 2009; 34(9):982-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.002.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.002
• ¹¹
  Monteiro SN, Lopes FPD, Ferreira AS and Nascimento DCO. Natural fiber polymer matrix composites: cheaper, tougher and environmentally friendly. JOM. 2009; 61(1):17-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-009-0004-z.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-009-0004-z
• ¹²
  Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP and Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers. Progress in Polymer Science. 2012; 37(11):1555-1596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003
• ¹³
  Thakur VK, Thakur MK, Raghavan P and Kessler MR. Progress in green polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: a review. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 2014; 2(5):1072-1092. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sc500087z.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/sc500087z
• ¹⁴
  Wambua P, Ivens I and Verpoest I. Natural fibers: can they replace glass and fibre reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology. 2003; 63(1):1259-1264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4
• ¹⁵
  Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK and Arora S. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos Part A. 2004; 35(3):371-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016
• ¹⁶
  Monteiro SN, Lopes FPD, Barbosa AP, Bevitori AB, Silva ILA and Costa LL. Natural lignocellulosic fibers as engineering materials —An Overview. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions. A, Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 2011; 42(10):2963-2974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0789-6.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0789-6
• ¹⁷
  Marsh G. Next step for automotive materials. Materials Today. 2003; 6(4):36-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00429-2.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(03)00429-2
• ¹⁸
  Holbery J and Houston D. Natural fiber reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM. 2006; 58(11):80-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0234-2.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0234-2
• ¹⁹
  Zah R, Hischier R, Leão AL and Braun I. Curaua fibers in automobile industry: a sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007; 15(1):1032-1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.036.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.036
• ²⁰
  Satyanarayana KG, Guimarães JL and Wypych F. Studies on lignocellulosic fibers of Brazil. Part I: Source, production, morphology, properties and applications. Compos Part A. 2007; 38(1):1694-1709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.006.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.02.006
• ²¹
  Leão A, Sartor SM and Caraschi JC. Natural fibers based composites: technical ad social issues. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2006; 448(1):161-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15421400500388088.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15421400500388088
• ²²
  Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Margem JI, Martins LBS, Oliveira CG and Oliveira MP. Infrared spectroscopy analysis of malva fibers. Materials Science Forum. 2014; 775-776:255-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.775-776.255.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.775-776.255
• ²³
  Monteiro SN, Margem FM, Margem JI, Martins LBS, Oliveira CG and Oliveira MP. Dynamic-mechanical behavior of malva fiber reinforced polyester matrix composites. Materials Science Forum. 2014; 775-776:278-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.775-776.278.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.775-776.278
• ²⁴
  Margem JI, Gomes VA, Faria R Jr, Margem FM, Cordeiro T, Margem MR, et al. Photoacoustic thermal characterization of malva fibers. In: Carpenter JS, Bai C, Escobedo-Diaz JP, Hwang JY, Ikhmayies S, Li B, et al., editors. Characterization of Minerals, Metals and Materials. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 259-264.
• ²⁵
  Margem JI, Monteiro SN, Gomes VA, Margem FM and Margem MR. Pullout tests behavior of epoxy matrix reinforced with malva fibers. In:Carpenter JS, Bai C, Escobedo-Diaz JP, Hwang JY, Ikhmayies S, Li B, et al., editors. Characterization of minerals, metals and materials. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 457-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119093404.ch56.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119093404.ch56
• ²⁶
  American Society for Testing and Materials – ASTM. ASTM 790-03: standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. West Conshohocken: ASTM; 2003.
• ²⁷
  Callister WD Jr and Rethwish DG. Materials science and engineering: an introduction. 8th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  17 Nov 2015
• Date of issue
  Dec 2015

History

• Received
  11 Nov 2014
• Reviewed
  10 Oct 2015