Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Composition, Elastic Property and Packing Efficiency Predictions for Bulk Metallic Glasses in Binary, Ternary and Quaternary Systems

Abstract

The results of database based on the efficiency packed model for metallic glasses. The database contains the atomic radii information as well as elastic properties of the most commonly used alloying elements, permitting composition, packing efficiency and elastic property predictions to be made for binary, ternary and quaternary bulk metallic glasses. Twenty different alloys per system (binary, ternary and quaternary) experimentally reported in the literature were compared with those estimated by the database. Comparison charts and diagrams showed good agreement between the composition predictions and those reported from the experimentally processed metallic glasses. The elastic properties predictions could be used to elaborate Blackman diagrams in order to know, in advance, the intrinsic toughness that the investigated alloys might present. The database is intended for designing bulk metallic glasses. Finally, some quaternary alloys were experimentally produced based on the prediction obtained with the database, showing a glassy phase. The microhardness values obtained experimentally of the Zr57.52Ag10.62Al10.62Co21.24, Zr57.19Al10.7Ni10.7Cu21.41 and Hf60.22Al9.95Cu9.95Ni19.89alloys, are 3.8, 4.0 and 3.6 GPa, respectively. The Young´s modulus calculated using microhardness values (E/Hv = 20) are closed to the values obtained by the "mixing rules".

Keywords:
Bulk metallic glasses; Packing efficiency; Glass formation


1 Introduction

Despite new metallic glass systems being continuously investigated and reported, and a broadening of the number of engineering applications for this kind of material, the discovery, development and manufacture of bulk metallic glass (BMG) systems is still a complex and long process. Materials science and engineering states that when a new material is to be produced, prior to this, some properties would be expected from that new material, from its shape, component materials, structure, etc. The other way around would be, knowing the structure, component materials and production of new materials in order to fit some specification. However, for metallic glasses, the structure is still an unsolved puzzle, even though the international community has witnessed their advantageous properties and behaviour i.e. high strength, corrosion and wear resistant, chemical inertness, high toughness, among others.

In 1926, Goldschmidt11 Goldschmidt VM. Geochemische Verteilungsgesetze der Elemente VIII. Oslo: Skrifter Norske Videnkaps; 1926. correlated the ability to form a glass with the value of the radius ratio rA/rO for oxides AmOn. He found that for all the oxides which had been prepared in the vitreous form, the radius ratio was around 0.2 - 0.4. Zachariasen22 Zachariasen WH. The atomic arrangement in glass. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1932;54(10):3841-3851. DOI: 10.1021/ja01349a006
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01349a006...
, proposed a model where the SiO4 polyhedron is repeated to produce a continuous random network (CRN). Regarding the study of BMG structure, different structural models have been proposed in the past 50 years; Bernal's "dense random packing"33 Bernal JD, Mason J. Packing of spheres: coordination of randomly packed spheres. Nature. 1960;188(4754):910-911. DOI: 10.1038/188910a0
https://doi.org/10.1038/188910a0...
model and Miracle's "efficient solute-centred cluster packing"44 Miracle DB. A structural model for metallic glasses. Nature Materials. 2004;3:697-702. doi:10.1038/nmat1219
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1219...
, amongst many others. The results of the latter are consistent with the high densities measured in bulk metallic glasses. Table 1 summaries some historical ideas pertaining to atomic packing and glass formation.

Table 1
Summarised historical events of atomic packing and glass formation.

Packing in BMG is very dense with melt viscosities that are several orders of magnitude higher than in pure metallic melts. The dense packing accomplished by structural and chemical atomic ordering below the glass transition temperature also brings the BMG-forming liquids energetically and entropically closer to the corresponding crystalline state. These factors lead to slow crystallisation kinetics and consequentially to high glass forming ability (GFA)1212 Axinte E. Metallic glasses from "alchemy" to pure science: Present and future of design, processing and applications of glassy metals. Materials and Design. 2012;35:518-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.028
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09...
. Since GFA is an influential factor in studying the formation of BMG, the search for systems with sufficiently high GFA is a critical task in this field.

The mechanical behaviour of metallic glasses is also one of the most important topics, attracting a huge amount of research effort. Given its large practical relevance to the implementation of BMG as structural materials in real applications, it is important to know whether a material shows plastic deformation or brittle rupture under certain loading conditions. As a tool for this, the use of Blackman diagrams have been suggested and employed1313 Plummer JD, Todd I. Implications of elastic constants, fragility, and bonding on permanent deformation in metallic glass. Appllied Physics Letters. 2011;98(2):021907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652...
to explain the tendency for permanent deformation that a system may exhibit.

The work presented in this manuscript is based on several theoretical models for metallic glasses in terms of glass formation and elastic properties, and is intended to offer an alternative route to design and obtain BMG by estimating the system with GFA from a structural perspective (densest atomic packing) and predict its theoretical elemental elastic properties, from which some indication of plasticity can be obtained. In addition to the above, quaternary alloys were experimentally produced in order to get bulk metallic glasses.

2 Experimental and theoretical calculations

2.1 Theoretical chemical composition calculation

Chemical compositions were calculated based on a sphere-packing scheme (solute-centred clusters occupying an f.c.c. cluster unit cell)44 Miracle DB. A structural model for metallic glasses. Nature Materials. 2004;3:697-702. doi:10.1038/nmat1219
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1219...
. The Miracle's model includes the calculation of the three-dimensional coordination number NT, which is obtained for a radius ratio R* for maximum packing efficiency1414 Miracle DB, Sanders WS, Senkov O. The influence of efficient atomic packing on the constitution of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine. 2003;83(20):2409-2428. DOI: 10.1080/1478643031000098828
https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643031000098...
. The efficiency packing was calculated from the chemical composition1414 Miracle DB, Sanders WS, Senkov O. The influence of efficient atomic packing on the constitution of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine. 2003;83(20):2409-2428. DOI: 10.1080/1478643031000098828
https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643031000098...
and cluster unit cell length1515 Miracle DB. The efficient cluster packing model - An atomic structural model for metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2006;54(16):4317-4336. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.002
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.0...
.

2.2 Theoretical elastic properties calculation

The elastic modulus predictions were also carried out for different glassy alloys systems taken from the literature. The estimations were made by applying the "rule of mixtures" approach 1616 Liu GR. A step-by-step method of rule-of-mixture of fiber and particle-reinforced composite materials. Composite Structure.1998;40(3-4):313-322. doi:10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00033-6
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00...
-1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656. once having estimated the composition for the alloy using the efficient cluster-packing model. In the same way as before, theoretical estimations were compared to experimental values reported in the open literature. Twenty different values for Poisson's ratio for typical BMG were taken from 1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656.; for these twenty systems elastic constants c11,c12 and c44 were also predicted in order to elaborate a Blackman diagram (plottingc12/c11 vs.c44/c11). The elastic constants cij were calculated with 1 - 3 equations1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656.-1818 Ledbetter H. Handbook of elastic properties of solids liquids and gases. New York: Academic Science; 2001. Vol. 2.

c 11 = K + ( 4 3 ) G (1)
c 12 = ( 3 K c 11 ) / 2 (2)
c 44 = G (3)

The transition between brittle and tough regimes is atνcrit = 0.31 - 0.321919 Lewandowski J, Wang WH, Greer AL. Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine Letters. 2005;85(2):77–87.. Higher values of ν give higher fracture energy1919 Lewandowski J, Wang WH, Greer AL. Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine Letters. 2005;85(2):77–87.. In other words, the larger the ν is, the more ductile the BMG become, and small variation of ν will significantly change the ductility1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656.. Several theoretical compositions obtained from the database were compared to those reported in the literature, and twenty different alloys per system (binary, ternary and quaternary), reported in the literature, are considered here.

2.3 Experimental method

Alloys with nominal compositions Zr57.52Ag10.62Al10.62Co21.24, Zr57.19Al10.7Ni10.7Cu21.41, and Hf60.22Al9.95Cu9.95Ni19.89 were prepared with pure elements (purity > 99.99%). The alloys were prepared under Ti-gettered inert atmosphere of argon (high purity > 99.9) using the arc-melting technique. All the ingots were re-melted five times in order to achieve a chemical homogeneity. Then, the molten alloys were poured into a copper mold with an internal cylindrical cavity of 2 mm diameter × 12 mm length by suction casting technique. The structure of the samples was characterized by means of X-ray diffraction with a Siemens D5000 diffractometer, using Cu Kα radiation. Finally, the hardness of the samples was carried out with a HMV-G21D hardness tester, in order to calculate the Young´s modulus values.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Chemical composition

The prediction for the binary Pd-Si, referred to in Table 2 as alloy 1, being the compositions Pd82Si18 and Pd82.96Si17.04, which are the reported and predicted, respectively, showed very good agreement. Other examples are the binaries Co-B, Al-Cu, Co-Zr, Au-Si, where the difference between the reported and predicted composition was small. From the twenty binary alloys investigated, about five showed a significant difference between the reported and predicted compositions. Composition predictions for the twenty different binary alloys were obtained; these alloys are listed in Table 2. It can be observed that the calculated packaging efficiency for the majority of the alloys was approximately 40%. The packing efficiency for Co77.61B22.39, Ba77.7Al22.3, Ba77.09Zn22.91, Ba77.09Zn22.91 and Fe77.79B22.21binary alloys was about 50%. Figure 1shows the absolute difference between calculated and reported compositions alloys. The absolute difference of chemical composition for most alloys compared is less than 14%. The Ni-Nb (Ni59.5Nb40.5, Ni89.69Nb10.31, Cu64.5Zr35.5 and Cu90.94Zr9.06) binary system, showed 30% of difference, approximately.

Table 2
Predicted and reported alloy compositions for binary systems2020 Yao KF, Chen N. Pd-Si binary bulk metallic glass. Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy. 2008;51(4):414-420. DOI: 10.1007/s11433-008-0051-4
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-008-0051-...

21 Guo FQ, Poon SJ, Shiflet GJ. CaAl-based bulk metallic glasses with high thermal stability. Appllied Physics Letters. 2004;84(1):37-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1637940
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1637940...

22 Leonhardt M, Löser W, Lindenkreuz HG. Solidification kinetics and phase formation of undercooled eutectic Ni–Nb melts. Acta Materialia. 1999;47(10):2961-2968.

23 Wang D, Li Y, Sun BB, Sui ML, Lu K, Ma E. Bulk metallic glass formation in the binary Cu-Zr system. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;84(20): 4029-4031.

24 Buschow KH. Thermal stability of amorphous Zr-Cu alloys. Journal of Applied Physics. 1981;52(5):3319-3323.DOI: 10.1063/1.329152
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.329152...

25 WasedaY, Chen HS. A structural study of metallic glasses containing boron (Fe-B, Co-B and Ni-B. Physica Status Solidi.1978;49(1):387-392. DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210490149
https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210490149...

26 Davies HA, Hull JB. Some aspects of splat-quenching in an inert atmosphere and of the formation of non-crystalline phases in Al-17.3 at. % Cu, germanium and tellurium. Journal of Materials Science. 1974;9:707-717.

27 Nose M, Masumoto T. Characteristics of (Fe, Co and/or Ni)-Zr amorphous alloys. Science Reports of the Research Institute Tohoku University SerA,Physicis,chemistry and metallurgy. 1980;28A:222-236.

28 Chen HS, Jackson KA. The Influence of alloy composition on glass formation and properties. In: Polk DE, Giesen BC. Metallic Glasses. Ohio, USA: Metals Park; 1978. p.74-96.

29 Predecki P, Giessen BC, Grant NJ. New metastable alloy. Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME. 1965;233(7): 1438-1439.

30 Klement W, Willens RH, Duwez P. Non-crystalline structure in solidified gold-silicon alloys. Nature. 1960;187:869-870.

31 Sommer F, Duddek G, Predel B. New glassy alloys. Zeitchrift Metallkude. 1978;69:587-590.

32 St Amand R, Geissen BC. Easy glass formation in simple metal alloys: amorphous metals containing calcium and strontium. Scripta Metallurgica. 1978;12(11):1021-1026. Doi:10.106/0036-9748(78)90017-0
https://doi.org/10.106/0036-9748(78)9001...
-3333 Hasegawa R, Ray R. Iron-boron metallic glasses. Journal of Applied Physics. 1978;49:4174-4178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.325328
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.325328...
.
Figure 1
Difference of chemical compositions of binary alloys. (a) Absolute difference of composition predictions for twenty different binary alloys and (b) Difference of solvents predictions for twenty different binary alloys.

Table 3 shows 20 ternary metallic glass compositions reported, it also includes the compositions and packing efficiency calculated with the database. The 4, 5, 7, 11, 15, and 20 alloy systems showed good agreement between calculated and reported ternary compositions as shown inFigure 2. However, for the Cu-Zr-Al, Mg-Gd-Cu and Cu-Zr-Be ternary alloy systems a significant difference was evident. On the other hand, the packing efficiency calculated for the Fe75.76Y6.06B18.18 alloy was exceptional, i.e. 96.41%. In addition, the difference between the calculated and reported composition was very small.

Table 3
Predicted and reported alloy compositions for ternary systems 3434 Lu S, Tang MB, Xia L. Excellent magnetocaloric effect of a Gd55Al20Co bulk metallic glass. 25Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2011;406(18):3398-3401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.06.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.06....

35 Yu P, Chan KC, Chen W, Xia L. Elastic moduli and mechanical properties of bulk metallic glasses after quasi-static compression. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(34):8518-8521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.0...

36 Soubeyroux JL, Puech S, Blandin J. Effect of silver on the glass forming ability of MgCuGdY bulk metallic glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2009;483(1-2) :107-111. DOI : 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.234
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.0...

37 Peng H Li SS, Qi YP, Huang TY. Mg–Ni–Gd–Ag bulk metallic glass with improved glass-forming ability and mechanical properties. Intermetallics. 2011;19(7):829-832. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.11.029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2010....

38 Wada T, Qin FX, Wang XM, Yoshimura M, Inoue A, Sugiyama N, et al. Formation and bioactivation of Zr-Al-Co bulk metallic glasses. Journal of Materials Research. 2009;24(9):2941-2948. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0348
https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0348...

39 Park ES, Chang HJ, Kim DH. Effect of addition of Be on glass-forming ability, plasticity and structural change in Cu–Zr bulk metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2008;56(13):3120-3131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.044
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.0...

40 He Q, Cheng YQ, Ma E, Xu J. Locating bulk metallic glasses with high fracture toughness: Chemical effects and composition optimization. Acta Materialia. 2011;59(1):202-215.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.0...

41 Zhang L, Cheng YQ, Cao AJ, Xu J, Ma E. Bulk metallic glasses with large plasticity: Composition design from the structural perspective. Acta Materialia. 2009;57 (4) :154-1164.

42 Huang XM, Chang CT, Chang ZY, Wang XD, Cao QP, Shen BL, et al. Formation of bulk metallic glasses in the Fe-M-Y-B (M = transition metal) system. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2008;460(1-2):708-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.063
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.0...

43 Guo G, Bian X, Meng Q, Zhao Y, Li X, Zhang S. Ternary Sm-Al-Co bulk metallic glass with high glass-forming ability. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2007;431(1-2):167-170. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.072
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.0...

44 Kong HZ, Li Y, Ding J. Magnetic hardening in amorphous alloy Sm60Fe30Al. 10Scripta Materialia. 2001;44(5): 829-834. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00652-7
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00...

45 Li S, Wang RJ, Pan MX, Zhao DQ, Wang WH. Heavy rare earth based bulk metallic glasses with high thermal stability. Intermetallic. 2006;14:592-595.

46 Jo CL, Xia L, Ding D, Dong YD. Glass formation ability and kinetics of the GdAl. 5520Ni25 bulk metallic glassChinese PhysicsLetters. 2006;23(3):672-674.

47 Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 1957;29(11):1702-1706.

48 Zhang B, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Wang WH, Greer AL. Amorphous metallic plastic. Physical Review Letters. 2005;94:205502

49 Takeuchi A, Inoue A. Size dependence of soft to hard magnetic transition. Materialis Science and Engineering: A. 2004;375-377:1140-1144. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.2...

50 Wang YT, Xi XK, Fang YK, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Han BS, et al. Tb nanocrystalline array assembled directly from alloy melt. Applied Physics Letters. 2004; 85(24):5989-5991.

51 Guo FQ, Poon SJ, Shiflet GJ. Metallic glass ingots based on yttrium. Applied Physics Letters. 2003;83(13):2575-2577.

52 Wang J, Li R, Hua N, Huang L, Zhang T. Ternary Fe–P–C bulk metallic glass with good soft-magnetic and mechanical properties. Scripta Materialia. 2011;65(6):536-539.
-5353 Jiang QK, Zhang GQ, Yang L, Wang XD, Saks K, Franz H, et al. La-based bulk metallic glasses with critical diameter up to 30 mm. Acta Materialia. 2007;55(13):4409-4418. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.021
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.0...
.
Figure 2
Difference of chemical compositions of ternary alloys. (a) Composition predictions of solvents for twenty different ternary alloys and (b) Difference of ternary large solutes for the predicted and calculated alloys.

Table 4 shows the quaternary compositions of BMG reported and calculated. Figure 3 shows good agreement of quaternary compositions. The chemical compositions difference of the alloys reported and calculated was less than 10% for most of the alloy systems studied.

Table 4
Predicted and reported alloy compositions for quaternary systems3636 Soubeyroux JL, Puech S, Blandin J. Effect of silver on the glass forming ability of MgCuGdY bulk metallic glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2009;483(1-2) :107-111. DOI : 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.234
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.0...
,3737 Peng H Li SS, Qi YP, Huang TY. Mg–Ni–Gd–Ag bulk metallic glass with improved glass-forming ability and mechanical properties. Intermetallics. 2011;19(7):829-832. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.11.029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2010....
,4040 He Q, Cheng YQ, Ma E, Xu J. Locating bulk metallic glasses with high fracture toughness: Chemical effects and composition optimization. Acta Materialia. 2011;59(1):202-215.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.025
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.0...
,4242 Huang XM, Chang CT, Chang ZY, Wang XD, Cao QP, Shen BL, et al. Formation of bulk metallic glasses in the Fe-M-Y-B (M = transition metal) system. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2008;460(1-2):708-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.063
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.0...
,5454 Schroers J, Johnson WL. Highly processable bulk metallic glass-forming alloys in the Pt-Co-Ni-Cu-P system. Applied Physics letters. 2004;84(18):3666-3668.

55 Zhang C, Li N, Pan J, Guo SF, Zhang M, Liu L. Enhancement of glass-forming ability and bio-corrosion resistance of Zr-Co-Al bulk metallic glasses by the addition of Ag. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2010;504S:S163-S167.

56 Xia L, Chan KC, Tang MB. Enhanced glass forming ability and refrigerant capacity of a Gd55Ni22MnAl bulk metallic glass. 320Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(23): 6640-6643. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.0...

57 Kawashima A, Zeng Y, Fukuhara M, Kurishita H, Nishiyama N, Miki H, et al. Mechanical properties of a Ni60Pd20PB bulk glassy alloy at cryogenic temperatures. 173Materials Science and Engineering A. 2008;498(1-2):475-481. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2008.08.033
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.08.0...

58 Zhang L, Cheng YQ, Cao AJ, Xu J, Ma E. Bulk metallic glasses with large plasticity: Composition design from the structural perspective. Acta Materialia. 2009;57(4):1154-1164.

59 Huang XM, Chang CT, Chang ZY, Inoue A, Jiang JZ. Glass forming ability, mechanical and magnetic properties in Fe-W-Y-B alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010;527(7-8):1952-1956. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.042
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.0...
-6060 Jiang QK, Wang XD, Nie XP, Zhang GQ, Ma H, Fecht HJ, et al. Zr-(Cu,Ag)-Al bulk metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2008;56(8):1785-1796..
Figure 3
Difference of chemical compositions of ternary alloys. (a) Composition predictions of solvents for twenty different quaternary alloys and (b) Difference of quaternary large solutes for predicted and calculated alloys.

3.2 Elastic properties

The elastic modulus (E) and shear modulus (G) estimations for twenty different alloys were also calculated and compared with those reported in the literature. The corresponding alloys are listed in Tables 5 and 6, respectively and plotted in Figure 4. (It was possible to estimate values for bulk modulus (K), too, but these are not included in this work).

Table 5
Predicted and reported G for several alloys; alloys 1-12 1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656. and 13-201313 Plummer JD, Todd I. Implications of elastic constants, fragility, and bonding on permanent deformation in metallic glass. Appllied Physics Letters. 2011;98(2):021907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652...
.
Table 6
Predicted and reported E for several alloys; alloys 1-121717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656. and 13-201313 Plummer JD, Todd I. Implications of elastic constants, fragility, and bonding on permanent deformation in metallic glass. Appllied Physics Letters. 2011;98(2):021907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652...
.
Figure 4
Predicted and reported elastic proprieties values for several alloys. (a) Elastic modulus and (b) Shear modulus.

Regarding the Young's modulus, E, the Mg65Cu25Tb10 system reports 51.3 GPa while its predicted value was 54.8 GPa; the Hf55Ni25Al20 reports 117.63 GPa1313 Plummer JD, Todd I. Implications of elastic constants, fragility, and bonding on permanent deformation in metallic glass. Appllied Physics Letters. 2011;98(2):021907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652...
and the predicted value is 113.8 GPa (Hf60Ni30Al10). In general, the similarity between the reported and predicted elastic moduli is rather good. However, it can be noticed that some of the composition predictions, even though they did show a slight deviation from those reported in literature, kept a narrow correlation with regards to the elastic modulus values. The elastic property predictions also showed good correlation with the corresponding experimentally reported data (Tables 5,6 and Figure 4). The Mg65Cu25Tb10 ternary system reports a shear modulus, G, of 19.6 GPa1313 Plummer JD, Todd I. Implications of elastic constants, fragility, and bonding on permanent deformation in metallic glass. Appllied Physics Letters. 2011;98(2):021907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652...
and its corresponding prediction gives 20.8 GPa (Mg79.03Cu10.48Tb10.48); the quaternary Gd40Y16Al24Co20 reports a G of 23.5 GPa1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656. and its predicted value is 27.3 GPa (Gd63.7Y9.08Al18.15Co9.08).

The Poisson's ratio estimations for twenty different alloys were also calculated and compared with those reported in the literature. The corresponding alloys are listed in Table 7; it also includes the elastic constants ratios (c44/c11 andc12/c11) calculated by the database. The absolute difference percentage of the Poisson's ratio in most alloys compared in this work was between 3.8% - 12%. Compositions 3, 7, and 8, show smaller values than 3%, due to chemical composition similarity. Compositions 10 and 17, show a greater value than 13%, due to greater discrepancy between reported and calculated compositions.

Table 7
Poisson's ratios for different alloys1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656., and their respectively predicted elastic constants ratios.

Figure 5 shows a Blackman diagram constructed using the data from twenty different predicted alloys (listed inTable 7), with the Poisson's ratio. Concerning to the intrinsic toughness estimated for the twenty different predicted alloys, the Poisson's ratio was consistent with the ductile behaviour in most of the alloys. These results could provide an insight into the tough-brittle behaviour that the system might present. Those values at the upper left, such as: Pd75Cu12.5Si12.5 (0.216, 0.676, 0.403; c44/c11,c12/c11, Poisson's ratio, respectively) and Ni71.36Nb21.48Sn7.16(0.274, 0.590, 0.371) corresponds to higher Poisson's ratio values (lowc44/c11 and highc12/c11), and so those systems would be expected to display ductile behaviour.

Figure 5
Blackman diagram of twenty different predicted alloys.

The Poisson´s ratio reported and predicted for Ho39Al25Co20Y16 are 0.319 and 0.328, respectively. These are down to the right on the Blackman construction and the transition from brittle to tough behaviour would be expected atv ~ 0.32, which is consistent with the criterion reported.1919 Lewandowski J, Wang WH, Greer AL. Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine Letters. 2005;85(2):77–87.

With the database, it was possible to make other predictions based on elastic properties, such as the kinetic fragility index, m, which was calculated with equation (4)3939 Park ES, Chang HJ, Kim DH. Effect of addition of Be on glass-forming ability, plasticity and structural change in Cu–Zr bulk metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2008;56(13):3120-3131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.044
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.0...
.

m=12(KG+0.67)(4)

The kinetic fragility index is recently used to know whether an alloy will present high or low GFA6363 Lafi OA, Imran MM. Compositional dependence of thermal stability, glass-forming ability and fragility index in some Se-Te-Sn glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(16):5090-5094.. Since elastic moduli can be potentially correlated to a wide range of physical, mechanical and thermal properties in BMGs, the way the database has been used here may be considered a starting point for how it can be implemented in future studies. Additionally, the database performs three different composition predictions for the ternary systems, the one that considers the gamma sites to be empty, another in which gamma sites are half occupied byβγ anti-site defects and the last one that assumes all gamma sites are occupied by the presence ofβγ anti-site defects. Thus, the best prediction approach was chosen to be compared with the reported data in the ternary systems.

3.3 Experimental results

In order to test the database, some glass alloys in the form of bulk were experimentally obtained. Figure 6 shows the XRD pattern of the Zr57.52Ag10.62Al10.62Co21.24, Zr57.19Al10.7Ni10.7Cu21.41, and Hf60.22Al9.95Cu9.95Ni19.89alloys. The XRD patterns are constituted by a single broad peak (located between 2θ ~ 35 and 55o) typical of a metallic glass. These results confirm the usefulness of the work presented in this manuscript, where it was possible to design, model and produce bulk metallic glasses a-priori, reducing the experimental work time associated with standard experimental processes.

Figure 6
XRD patterns of the experimentally obtained bulk metallic glasses.

Table 8 shows packing efficiency values and kinetic fragility index m of alloys produced. The efficiency packing values were between 45% and 50%. According to Angell 6161 Angell CA. Structural instability and relaxation in liquid and glassy phases near the fragile liquid limit. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1988;102(1-3):205-221.doi:10.1016/0022-3093(88)90133-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(88)901...
-6262 Angell CA. Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals - strong/fragile patterns and problems. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1991;131-133(Part 1):13-31., glass-forming liquids can be classified into strong and fragile liquids, depending on their fragility. The upper and lower limits of parameter are theoretically estimated between 16 for ‘strong' systems and 200 for ‘fragile' systems6363 Lafi OA, Imran MM. Compositional dependence of thermal stability, glass-forming ability and fragility index in some Se-Te-Sn glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(16):5090-5094.. The alloys obtained are strong systems with high glass forming ability.

Table 8
Compositions, packaging efficiency and kinetic index of fragility, calculated with the database for the obtained BMGs.

Table 9 shows compositions calculated by "mixing rules", elastic properties, and elastic constants ratios (c44/c11 andc12/c11). The typical BMGs have Young's modulus E ~ 25 GPa - 250 GPa, shear modulus G ~ 9 GPa - 88 GPa, and bulk modulus K ~ 20 GPa - 243 GPa 1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656..

Table 9
Elastic properties calculated with the "mixing rules" for the obtained BMGs.

A good correlation between microhardness, Hv, and Young's modulus, E, has been reported elsewhere1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656., in that work, it is reported an E/Hv ~20.

The microhardness values obtained experimentally in this work of Zr57.52Ag10.62Al10.62Co21.24, Zr57.19Al10.7Ni10.7Cu21.41 and Hf60.22Al9.95Cu9.95Ni19.89alloys, are 3.8, 4.0 and 3.6 GPa, respectively. If these values are substituted in the E/Hv = 20 relationship found in the previous research1717 Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656., then the Young´s modulus values calculated are 76, 80 and 73 GPa. These values are closed to the calculated values with the "mixing rules" (table 9).

The elastic constants ratios were used to plot a Blackman diagram. Figure 7 shows the Blackman diagram of alloys mentioned above with their corresponding Poisson's ratio. It shows the values at the upper left (lowc44/c11 and highc12/c11) and high Poisson´s ratio values, suggest ductile behaviour.

Figure 7
Blackman diagram of the experimentally obtained bulk metallic glasses.

4 Conclusions

The results of the database presented here for estimating composition and elemental elastic properties in metallic glasses have been able to closely approach those experimentally determined and reported in the literature. They additionally provide valuable information regarding the mechanical behaviour that these alloys might present. This illustrates the usefulness of these theoretical models. In relation to the packing efficiency calculations, particularly those obtained for the quaternary systems, it can be noticed that some other factors such as chemical affinity, bonding and/or the enthalpies of mixing, must play a key role in the BMG-forming systems. The database enclosing the methods used in this work has been developed; incorporates the elemental elastic constants for the most common alloying elements as well as their atomic radii information. The quaternary alloys experimentally obtained are strong systems with high glass forming ability, which is consistent with the Miracle´s model and kinetic fragility index m. The Young's modulus estimated with microhardness values are closed to those calculated by the "mixing rules". The Poisson´s ratio and Blackman diagram, suggest ductile behaviour of the BMGs obtained.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from SEP CONACYT 178289 for funding the project. A. Tejeda-Cruz, S. García-Galán, J. Morales-Rosales, C. Flores-Morales, C. Delgado, G. Aramburo, O. Novelo and J. M. Garcia-León are also acknowledged for their technical support.

References

  • 1
    Goldschmidt VM. Geochemische Verteilungsgesetze der Elemente VIII. Oslo: Skrifter Norske Videnkaps; 1926.
  • 2
    Zachariasen WH. The atomic arrangement in glass. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1932;54(10):3841-3851. DOI: 10.1021/ja01349a006
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01349a006
  • 3
    Bernal JD, Mason J. Packing of spheres: coordination of randomly packed spheres. Nature. 1960;188(4754):910-911. DOI: 10.1038/188910a0
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/188910a0
  • 4
    Miracle DB. A structural model for metallic glasses. Nature Materials. 2004;3:697-702. doi:10.1038/nmat1219
    » https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1219
  • 5
    Sun KH. Fundamental condition of glass formation. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 1947;30(9):277-281. DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1947.tb19654.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1947.tb19654.x
  • 6
    Polk D. The structure of glassy metallic alloys. Acta Metallurgica. 1972;20(4):485-491. Doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(72)90003-X
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(72)90003-X
  • 7
    Egami T, Waseda YJ. Atomic size effect on the formability of metallic glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1984;64(1-2):113-134.
  • 8
    Granato AV. Thermodynamic properties of liquid and amorphous monatomic metals from an interstitialcy model. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1993;156-158(Part 1):402-406. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(93)90206-D
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(93)90206-D
  • 9
    Egami T. Universal criterion for metallic glass formation. Materials Science and Engineering. 1997;226-228:261-267. doi:10.1016/S0921-5093(97)80041-X
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(97)80041-X
  • 10
    Senkov ON, Miracle DB. Effect of the atomic size distribution on glass forming ability of amorphous metallic alloys. Materials Research Bulletin. 2001;36(12):2183-2198. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-5408(01)00715-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5408(01)00715-2
  • 11
    Egami T. Atomistic mechanism of bulk metallic glass formation. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2003;317(1-2):30-33. doi:10.1016/S0022-3093(02)02003-3
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(02)02003-3
  • 12
    Axinte E. Metallic glasses from "alchemy" to pure science: Present and future of design, processing and applications of glassy metals. Materials and Design. 2012;35:518-556. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.028
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.028
  • 13
    Plummer JD, Todd I. Implications of elastic constants, fragility, and bonding on permanent deformation in metallic glass. Appllied Physics Letters. 2011;98(2):021907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
    » https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540652
  • 14
    Miracle DB, Sanders WS, Senkov O. The influence of efficient atomic packing on the constitution of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine. 2003;83(20):2409-2428. DOI: 10.1080/1478643031000098828
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643031000098828
  • 15
    Miracle DB. The efficient cluster packing model - An atomic structural model for metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2006;54(16):4317-4336. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.002
  • 16
    Liu GR. A step-by-step method of rule-of-mixture of fiber and particle-reinforced composite materials. Composite Structure.1998;40(3-4):313-322. doi:10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00033-6
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00033-6
  • 17
    Wang WH. The elastic properties, elastic models and elastic perspectives of metallic glasses. Progress in Materials Science. 2012;57:487-656.
  • 18
    Ledbetter H. Handbook of elastic properties of solids liquids and gases. New York: Academic Science; 2001. Vol. 2
  • 19
    Lewandowski J, Wang WH, Greer AL. Intrinsic plasticity or brittleness of metallic glasses. Philosophical Magazine Letters. 2005;85(2):77–87.
  • 20
    Yao KF, Chen N. Pd-Si binary bulk metallic glass. Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy. 2008;51(4):414-420. DOI: 10.1007/s11433-008-0051-4
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-008-0051-4
  • 21
    Guo FQ, Poon SJ, Shiflet GJ. CaAl-based bulk metallic glasses with high thermal stability. Appllied Physics Letters. 2004;84(1):37-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1637940
    » https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1637940
  • 22
    Leonhardt M, Löser W, Lindenkreuz HG. Solidification kinetics and phase formation of undercooled eutectic Ni–Nb melts. Acta Materialia. 1999;47(10):2961-2968.
  • 23
    Wang D, Li Y, Sun BB, Sui ML, Lu K, Ma E. Bulk metallic glass formation in the binary Cu-Zr system. Applied Physics Letters. 2004;84(20): 4029-4031.
  • 24
    Buschow KH. Thermal stability of amorphous Zr-Cu alloys. Journal of Applied Physics. 1981;52(5):3319-3323.DOI: 10.1063/1.329152
    » https://doi.org/10.1063/1.329152
  • 25
    WasedaY, Chen HS. A structural study of metallic glasses containing boron (Fe-B, Co-B and Ni-B. Physica Status Solidi.1978;49(1):387-392. DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210490149
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.2210490149
  • 26
    Davies HA, Hull JB. Some aspects of splat-quenching in an inert atmosphere and of the formation of non-crystalline phases in Al-17.3 at. % Cu, germanium and tellurium. Journal of Materials Science. 1974;9:707-717.
  • 27
    Nose M, Masumoto T. Characteristics of (Fe, Co and/or Ni)-Zr amorphous alloys. Science Reports of the Research Institute Tohoku University SerA,Physicis,chemistry and metallurgy. 1980;28A:222-236.
  • 28
    Chen HS, Jackson KA. The Influence of alloy composition on glass formation and properties. In: Polk DE, Giesen BC. Metallic Glasses. Ohio, USA: Metals Park; 1978. p.74-96.
  • 29
    Predecki P, Giessen BC, Grant NJ. New metastable alloy. Transactions of the Metallurgical Society of AIME. 1965;233(7): 1438-1439.
  • 30
    Klement W, Willens RH, Duwez P. Non-crystalline structure in solidified gold-silicon alloys. Nature. 1960;187:869-870.
  • 31
    Sommer F, Duddek G, Predel B. New glassy alloys. Zeitchrift Metallkude. 1978;69:587-590.
  • 32
    St Amand R, Geissen BC. Easy glass formation in simple metal alloys: amorphous metals containing calcium and strontium. Scripta Metallurgica. 1978;12(11):1021-1026. Doi:10.106/0036-9748(78)90017-0
    » https://doi.org/10.106/0036-9748(78)90017-0
  • 33
    Hasegawa R, Ray R. Iron-boron metallic glasses. Journal of Applied Physics. 1978;49:4174-4178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.325328
    » https://doi.org/10.1063/1.325328
  • 34
    Lu S, Tang MB, Xia L. Excellent magnetocaloric effect of a Gd55Al20Co bulk metallic glass. 25Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2011;406(18):3398-3401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.06.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2011.06.006
  • 35
    Yu P, Chan KC, Chen W, Xia L. Elastic moduli and mechanical properties of bulk metallic glasses after quasi-static compression. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(34):8518-8521. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.113
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.113
  • 36
    Soubeyroux JL, Puech S, Blandin J. Effect of silver on the glass forming ability of MgCuGdY bulk metallic glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2009;483(1-2) :107-111. DOI : 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.234
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.07.234
  • 37
    Peng H Li SS, Qi YP, Huang TY. Mg–Ni–Gd–Ag bulk metallic glass with improved glass-forming ability and mechanical properties. Intermetallics. 2011;19(7):829-832. doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2010.11.029
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2010.11.029
  • 38
    Wada T, Qin FX, Wang XM, Yoshimura M, Inoue A, Sugiyama N, et al. Formation and bioactivation of Zr-Al-Co bulk metallic glasses. Journal of Materials Research. 2009;24(9):2941-2948. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0348
    » https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2009.0348
  • 39
    Park ES, Chang HJ, Kim DH. Effect of addition of Be on glass-forming ability, plasticity and structural change in Cu–Zr bulk metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2008;56(13):3120-3131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.044
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.044
  • 40
    He Q, Cheng YQ, Ma E, Xu J. Locating bulk metallic glasses with high fracture toughness: Chemical effects and composition optimization. Acta Materialia. 2011;59(1):202-215.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.025
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.025
  • 41
    Zhang L, Cheng YQ, Cao AJ, Xu J, Ma E. Bulk metallic glasses with large plasticity: Composition design from the structural perspective. Acta Materialia. 2009;57 (4) :154-1164.
  • 42
    Huang XM, Chang CT, Chang ZY, Wang XD, Cao QP, Shen BL, et al. Formation of bulk metallic glasses in the Fe-M-Y-B (M = transition metal) system. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2008;460(1-2):708-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.063
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.063
  • 43
    Guo G, Bian X, Meng Q, Zhao Y, Li X, Zhang S. Ternary Sm-Al-Co bulk metallic glass with high glass-forming ability. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2007;431(1-2):167-170. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.072
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.05.072
  • 44
    Kong HZ, Li Y, Ding J. Magnetic hardening in amorphous alloy Sm60Fe30Al. 10Scripta Materialia. 2001;44(5): 829-834. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00652-7
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00652-7
  • 45
    Li S, Wang RJ, Pan MX, Zhao DQ, Wang WH. Heavy rare earth based bulk metallic glasses with high thermal stability. Intermetallic. 2006;14:592-595.
  • 46
    Jo CL, Xia L, Ding D, Dong YD. Glass formation ability and kinetics of the GdAl. 5520Ni25 bulk metallic glassChinese PhysicsLetters. 2006;23(3):672-674.
  • 47
    Kissinger HE. Reaction kinetics in differential thermal analysis. Analytical Chemistry. 1957;29(11):1702-1706.
  • 48
    Zhang B, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Wang WH, Greer AL. Amorphous metallic plastic. Physical Review Letters. 2005;94:205502
  • 49
    Takeuchi A, Inoue A. Size dependence of soft to hard magnetic transition. Materialis Science and Engineering: A. 2004;375-377:1140-1144. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.201
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2003.10.201
  • 50
    Wang YT, Xi XK, Fang YK, Zhao DQ, Pan MX, Han BS, et al. Tb nanocrystalline array assembled directly from alloy melt. Applied Physics Letters. 2004; 85(24):5989-5991.
  • 51
    Guo FQ, Poon SJ, Shiflet GJ. Metallic glass ingots based on yttrium. Applied Physics Letters. 2003;83(13):2575-2577.
  • 52
    Wang J, Li R, Hua N, Huang L, Zhang T. Ternary Fe–P–C bulk metallic glass with good soft-magnetic and mechanical properties. Scripta Materialia. 2011;65(6):536-539.
  • 53
    Jiang QK, Zhang GQ, Yang L, Wang XD, Saks K, Franz H, et al. La-based bulk metallic glasses with critical diameter up to 30 mm. Acta Materialia. 2007;55(13):4409-4418. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.021
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.021
  • 54
    Schroers J, Johnson WL. Highly processable bulk metallic glass-forming alloys in the Pt-Co-Ni-Cu-P system. Applied Physics letters. 2004;84(18):3666-3668.
  • 55
    Zhang C, Li N, Pan J, Guo SF, Zhang M, Liu L. Enhancement of glass-forming ability and bio-corrosion resistance of Zr-Co-Al bulk metallic glasses by the addition of Ag. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2010;504S:S163-S167.
  • 56
    Xia L, Chan KC, Tang MB. Enhanced glass forming ability and refrigerant capacity of a Gd55Ni22MnAl bulk metallic glass. 320Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(23): 6640-6643. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.120
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.120
  • 57
    Kawashima A, Zeng Y, Fukuhara M, Kurishita H, Nishiyama N, Miki H, et al. Mechanical properties of a Ni60Pd20PB bulk glassy alloy at cryogenic temperatures. 173Materials Science and Engineering A. 2008;498(1-2):475-481. DOI:10.1016/j.msea.2008.08.033
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.08.033
  • 58
    Zhang L, Cheng YQ, Cao AJ, Xu J, Ma E. Bulk metallic glasses with large plasticity: Composition design from the structural perspective. Acta Materialia. 2009;57(4):1154-1164.
  • 59
    Huang XM, Chang CT, Chang ZY, Inoue A, Jiang JZ. Glass forming ability, mechanical and magnetic properties in Fe-W-Y-B alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010;527(7-8):1952-1956. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.042
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.11.042
  • 60
    Jiang QK, Wang XD, Nie XP, Zhang GQ, Ma H, Fecht HJ, et al. Zr-(Cu,Ag)-Al bulk metallic glasses. Acta Materialia. 2008;56(8):1785-1796.
  • 61
    Angell CA. Structural instability and relaxation in liquid and glassy phases near the fragile liquid limit. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1988;102(1-3):205-221.doi:10.1016/0022-3093(88)90133-0
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(88)90133-0
  • 62
    Angell CA. Relaxation in liquids, polymers and plastic crystals - strong/fragile patterns and problems. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 1991;131-133(Part 1):13-31.
  • 63
    Lafi OA, Imran MM. Compositional dependence of thermal stability, glass-forming ability and fragility index in some Se-Te-Sn glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509(16):5090-5094.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    08 Mar 2016
  • Date of issue
    Mar-Apr 2016

History

  • Received
    08 Sept 2015
  • Reviewed
    25 Nov 2015
  • Accepted
    16 Dec 2015
ABM, ABC, ABPol UFSCar - Dep. de Engenharia de Materiais, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235, 13565-905 - São Carlos - SP- Brasil. Tel (55 16) 3351-9487 - São Carlos - SP - Brazil
E-mail: pessan@ufscar.br