Introduction
Modification of food consistency is an important component of the treatment of dysphagia1. However, standard definitions for the nomenclature, viscosity and texture of different food consistencies have not been established and may vary considerably among hospitals and countries. Therefore, there is a need for international standardization of the terminology and precise definition of liquid and food textures, considering not only the performance of clinical tests but also the management of patients with dysphagia2.
To achieve this objective, the International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) developed standardized definitions (classified by numbers, names and colors) for texture-modified foods and liquids3. Classification of modified liquids consisted of four levels rated from zero (thin) to four (extremely thick)3,4. The method proposed for the development of this classification system was the IDDSI flow test, using a syringe. In this test, 10 mL of the test liquid is added to a 10-mL syringe, and the volume remaining in the syringe after a 10-second period of flowing is measured.
Nevertheless, it is difficult to assume that all 10-mL syringes used in different centers across the countries are manufactured with the same configuration, which could affect the results obtained from the IDDSI flow test. This concern was considered by the IDDSI’s board of directors. The hypothesis of this study is that the syringe configuration affects the results of the IDDSI flow test. We aimed to investigate whether two different syringes yield different results in this test. A correct classification of liquid consistencies is fundamental for the application of the recently validated IDDSI Functional Diet Scale5.
Methods
This study did not involve human patients or experimental animals and was exempt from ethics committee approval.
Two 10-mL syringes were compared - Becton and Dickinson® (BD) (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and Saldanha Rodrigues® (SR) (Manaus, AM, Brazil). BD syringe has a 61mm length (from “0” to “10mL” marks), an outer diameter of 16 mm, an internal diameter of 14 mm, and syringe hub of 10 mm. SR syringe has a 50 mm length (from “0” to “10mL” marks), outer diameter of 19 mm, internal diameter of 18 mm, and a syringe hub of 12 mm.
The test was performed with water added with food thickener (maltodextrin, xanthan gum, and potassium chloride) at different concentrations - 1.2g, 2.4g and 3.6g in 100mL of water, barium sulfate at 1g / 3mL and 1g / 1mL, and 100 mL of barium sulfate 1g / 1 mL with 1.2 g of the thickener, all at room temperature.
The test consisted in adding 10 mL of the liquid test into the syringe (at vertical position) with the nozzle covered with the finger. The nozzle is released for 10 seconds, and the volume remaining in the syringe is measured after this period4. This procedure was repeated 10 times immediately after each texture-modified liquid was prepared (time zero), and also performed 8 hours and 24 hours thereafter.
Results of both syringes obtained at time zero were compared by the Mann-Whitney test, a non-parametric test that enables the comparison of two independent groups, without assuming normality of data distributions6. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS software, version 9.2.
Results
The volume remaining of water (Table 1) and thickened barium sulfate (Table 2) was lower in BD than in SR syringe after the 10-second period of flowing. This indicates that the flow rate (mL/s) of both fluids through the BD syringe was higher than through the SR syringe (Figures 1 and 2).
Table 1: Comparison between a 10-mL Bencton & Dickinson (BD) and a 10-mL Saldanha Rodrigues (SR) syringe in the volume of thickened liquid remaining in the syringe after 10 seconds of flowing
Thickener | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2g | 2.4g | 3.6g | ||||
MEAN (SD) | MEDIAN | MEAN (SD) | MEDIAN | MEAN (SD) | MEDIAN | |
BD | 4.7 (0.2) | 4.8 | 9.5 (0.3) | 9.4 | 9.9 (0.1) | 9.8 |
SR | 6.8 (0.2) | 6.8 | 9.9 (0.1) | 9.8 | 10.0 (0.0) | 10.0 |
p | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
SD: standard deviation; Man-Whitney test
Table 2: Comparison between a 10-mL Bencton & Dickinson (BD) and a 10-mL Saldanha Rodrigues (SR) syringe in the volume of barium sulfate remaining in the syringe after 10 seconds of flowing
Barium sulfate (concentrations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1g/3mL | 1g/1mL | 1g/1mL + 1.2g thickener | ||||
MEAN (SD) | MEDIAN | MEAN (SD) | MEDIAN | MEAN (SD) | MEDIAN | |
BD | 1.4 (0.1) | 1.4 | 7.9 (0.2) | 7.8 | 8.3 (0.1) | 8.4 |
SR | 4.3 (0.3) | 4.2 | 9.4 (0.2) | 9.4 | 9.6 (0.2) | 9.7 |
p | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
SD: standard deviation; Man-Whitney test

Legend: BD = Becton and Dickinson; SR = Saldanha Rodrigues
Figure 1: Flow rate (mL/s) through the Bencton & Dickinson and Saldanha Rodrigues syringes of water (100mL) added with food thickener at 1.2g, 2.4g and 3.6g measured immediately after preparation (time 0), and at 8 hours and 24 hours after preparation. Flow rate was significantly higher in the Bencton & Dickinson syringe (p<0.01).

Legend: BD = Becton and Dickinson; SR = Saldanha Rodrigues
Figure 2: Flow rate (mL/s) through the Bencton & Dickinson and Saldanha Rodrigues syringes of barium sulfate (100mL) diluted with water at 1g/3mL, 1g/1mL, and at 1g/1mL addedd with 1.2 of food thickener measured immediately after preparation (time 0), and at 8 hours and 24 hours after preparation. Flow rate was significantly higher in the Bencton & Dickinson syringe (p<0.01).
Classification of the consistency of water added with 3.6g of thickener differed between the syringes (IDDSI level 3 and level 4 for BD and SR, respectively) as well as for barium sulfate at 1g/3mL (level 1 for BD and level 2 for SR) and at 1g/1mL (level 2 for BD and level 3 for SR). No difference was found between the flow rates through the syringes measured at 8 hours and at 24 hours after the liquid preparation (Figures 1 and 2), and the differences in the classification of fluid consistencies according to the IDDSI framework between the two syringes were maintained.
Discussion
The use of texture-modified liquid foods is of paramount importance in the treatment of dysphagia to avoid food aspiration in patients with oral feeding7,8. Hydration depends on fluid intake, and many patients are not able to swallow low-viscosity fluids, which are associated with a higher risk of aspiration8. Foods with high consistency are hence required for maintenance of a favorable nutritional status.
So far, institutions where dysphagia patients are diagnosed and treated have developed different understandings and terminologies for the terms “thin liquid”, “paste”, “solid”, “thickened liquid”, “pudding” and “nectar/honey-thick” liquids, “soft solid” consistency, “puree”, among others, variable according to the country, the culture and eating habits of the population. Even though eating habits are influenced by cultural, social, ethnical and racial aspects that should be considered, especially in patients with digestive symptoms9; standardized characteristics and nomenclatures of food consistencies should be used across the countries.
The IDDSI was created with the aim to develop standardized terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods commonly used in the treatment of patients with dysphagia3. Categorization of consistencies by names, colors and numbers aims to facilitate the selection of the best food consistency for each patient. Standardized terminologies could be used in any place, irrespectively of the foods available and eating habits of each population, since the definitions proposed are for food consistencies, and not for foods themselves, which should be selected by those involved in patients’ nutrition and hydration care.
For this reason, characterization of each consistency should be precise, so that a same consistency can be used in different hospitals and populations with varied cultures, languages, and food availability. This would be achieved by using a simple, practical, reproducible evaluation method. There is a close relationship between the degree of dysphagia and IDDSI framework, an important implication for diet therapy in dysphagia patients10.
For classification of fluids, the method proposed is the IDDSI flow test3,4, available at www.iddsi.org and already translated into Portuguese. The test was described with the use of a BD syringe, and the use of another syringe, with different manufacturing features, may yield different results, which was confirmed by our findings. In addition, syringes manufactured in different countries could also have distinct characteristics that, although may not compromise their usefulness for administration of injectable drugs, may result in different performance and outcomes in the IDDSI flow test. Thus, the test performed with syringes of different brands than BD do not produce the same results than those described in the IDSSI framework for liquid consistency definitions3,4.
The reason for different syringes produce different results may be associated with the Hagen-Poiseuille law: Q= PπR4 / 8Lη, where Q is the volumetric flow rate, P is the pressure, R is the syringe radius, L is the length, and η is the viscosity coefficient of the fluid. Test with BD and SR syringes have the same P and η, and the lower flow rate shown by the SR syringe may be associated with the length of the syringe tip. This was confirmed by the fact that, if only the syringe barrel were considered, it would be expected a lower flow rate with the BD syringe; however, the radius (R) of the syringe hub is considerably reduced in relation to the barrel in both syringes and therefore the longer length of the tip was decisive for the lower flow rate.
Although their higher complexity and possible higher costs, other methods based on the same measuring principle of flow rate have been developed and should be tested11,12. The purpose of the IDDSI flow test is to provide a simple and fast way to determine the consistency of liquids and semi-liquids, without the use of expensive and highly complex equipment10. In this study, we did not evaluate the performance of the syringes in their primary purpose, i.e., administration of injectable drugs. Also, similar to previous results13, there was no significant changes in the consistencies of the texture-modified liquids within 24 hours of preparation, indicating their good stability.